`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE, INC., HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT MOBILE OY,
`MICROSOFT MOBILE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and ZTE (USA) INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2016-007581
`Patent 8,218,481 B2
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 IPR2016-001342 and IPR2016-01349 have been consolidated with this
`proceeding. IPR2017-00068 and IPR2017-00106 have been joined with
`IPR2016-00758. IPR2016-00981 has been joined with IPR2016-01349.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00758
`Patent 8,218,481 B2
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, Patent Owner, Evolved Wireless, LLC,
`
`hereby respectfully requests oral argument. Pursuant to the Order Conduct of
`
`Proceedings (Paper 36), oral argument is currently scheduled for October 17,
`
`2017. Evolved Wireless, LLC respectfully requests one hour to address the below-
`
`identified issues. Patent Owner also requests the ability to use audio-visual
`
`equipment to display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and
`
`screen for a PowerPoint display. Patent Owner requests the services of a court
`
`reporter to transcribe the proceeding.
`
`Patent Owner states that it anticipates that its Lead Counsel will not
`
`attend the Oral Argument, and that Backup Counsel will make all arguments
`
`for Patent Owner.
`
`Issues to be argued:
`
`1. Whether claims 1, 2, 8, and 9 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)
`
`or (b) as having been anticipated by Panasonic 792;
`
`2. Whether claims 3 and 10 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
`
`having been obvious over Panasonic 792 and Panasonic 114;
`
`3. Whether claims 6 and 13 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
`
`having been obvious over Panasonic 792, Panasonic 114, and Chu; and
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00758
`Patent 8,218,481 B2
`
`
`4. Any issues raised by Petitioners in any filings contemporaneous with or
`
`subsequent to this request.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 16, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Ryan M. Schultz/
`Cyrus A. Morton
`cmorton@robinskaplan.com
`Ryan M. Schultz
`rschultz@robinskaplan.com
`Robins Kaplan LLP
`2800 LaSalle Center
`800 LaSalle Ave
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
`Miles A. Finn
`mfinn@robinskaplan.com
`Robins Kaplan LLP
`399 Park Avenue
`Suite 3600
`New York, NY 10022
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00758
`Patent 8,218,481 B2
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this August 16, 2017, a copy of PATENT
`
`OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT has been served in its entirety
`
`via e-mail to the Petitioners:
`
`Charles M.McMahon
`cmcmahon@mwe.com
`Hersh H.Mehta
`hmehta@mwe.com
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY
`
`James M. Glass
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`John T. McKee
`johnmckee@quinnemanuel.com
`Kevin Johnson
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`Todd M. Briggs
`toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`W. Karl Renner
`renner@fr.com
`Roberto J. Devoto
`devoto@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`IPR00035-0010IP1@fr.com
`IPR00035-0010IP2@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`
`Dated: August 16, 2017
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/Ryan M. Schultz/
`
`Registration No. 65,134
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`4
`
`