throbber
Blatt, Rosch, Osterer: The Promise of Teletext for Hearing-Impaired Audiences
`
`717
`
`THE PROMISE OF TELETEXT FOR HEARING-IMPAIRED AUDIENCES
`
`Joseph Blatt
`WGBH/Boston
`Gary Rosch
`Federal Communications Commission
`Carole Osterer
`WGBH/Boston
`
`the current closed captioning project has
`As
`demonstrated,
`teletext-type
`technology is well
`suited for the delivery of information to deaf
`audiences. Newer developing systems will be able to
`provide a flexible system for captioning and a range of
`services which . will expand
`the
`information
`accessible to deaf people. In its simplest form the
`interactive capability of the system to retrieve timely
`data promises the deaf user things many of us take
`completely for granted: knowledge of today's
`weather forecast, traffic conditions, news headlines,
`community bulletin boards, school closings, sports
`results and more. Captioning will undoubtedly
`continue, though, as a main attraction for deaf
`viewers to teletext technologies.
`
`programming is available here than in all other
`countries combined.
`In 1958, Public Law 85-905 established Cap(cid:173)
`tioned Films for the Deaf, administered by the
`Department of Health, Education and Welfare,
`Bureau of Education for the Handicapped. Captioned
`Films provides a loan service of thousands of
`entertainment and educational films and videocas(cid:173)
`settes. It distributes these materials free of charge to
`about 6,000 registered accounts.
`The FCC has been concerned with the needs of
`the deaf and television for a number of years. In a
`policy statement released in December 1970, "The
`Use of Telecasts to Inform and Alert Viewers with
`Impaired Hearing," the FCC enunciated a desire that
`licensees consider the needs of those with aural
`impairments.
`In 1972, HEW mandated the first television
`program ever captioned: The French Chef. Julia
`Child's program, aired over PBS, was popular among
`deaf audiences and led to the development at WGBH
`of same-day news captioning in 1973.
`In February of 1976, in response to a petition
`rule making filed by PBS
`for
`requesting an
`amendment of Subpart E of Part 73 of the FCC's Rules
`and Regulations, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed
`Rule Making providing that line 21, field 1, and the
`available half of line 21, field 2, of the television
`vertical blanking interval be reserved for the trans(cid:173)
`mission of captioned information for the deaf.
`Numerous petitioners questioned whether a
`portion of the vertical blanking interval should be
`reserved for only one service. In the end the
`Commission ruled in December of 1976 that line 21
`could be used for a captioning service on an optional
`basis. In addition the FCC authorized the use of line
`21 for the display of non-program related material of a
`broadcast nature during the times when program(cid:173)
`related captioning was not displayed. The Com(cid:173)
`Captioning itt the United States
`mission noted that while the data format for the use
`of this line were specified, it would consider the
`The American television industry seems uniquely
`prepared to provide an atmosphere in which large(cid:173)
`authorization of other signal formats on an indi(cid:173)
`vidual basis.
`scale captioning can exist. In contrast to foreign
`Accordingly, the National Captioning Insti(cid:173)
`experience, the United States has a history of active
`tute began providing captioned programming for PBS,
`support for captioned television. More captioned
`1980 Chicago Spring Conference
`0098-3068/80/0717-0722$00.75©1980 IEEE
`
`Captioniug outside the United States
`Outside
`the U.S.,
`teletext systems are more
`advanced, and virtually every country that has Qr is
`·developing a system is planning to provide a
`captioning service. For the moment, however, very
`little . captioned programming
`is available. ~
`'England, where two teletext systems are operational,
`one hour a. week is broadcast over the BBC. In France,
`no capt,\oned programming is currently available.
`Sweden,· which has an operating teletext system,
`· makes · three hours of captioned programming
`available each week. In Germany, where teletext
`transmissions have
`just begun, no captioned
`programs are broadcast.
`the British
`Australia
`recently adopted
`standard for teletext transmission, but is currently
`broadcasting no captioned material. Japan, too, is
`provigmg no special captioned programming for deaf
`audiences.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2054
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 1
`
`

`
`718
`
`IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol. CE-26, November 1980
`
`ABC, and NBC in March 1980. NCI is currently
`captioning about 20 hours of prime-time program(cid:173)
`ming a week, broadcast in closed format over line 21
`of the vertical blanking interval.
`An open captioning service continues on PBS
`as well. This service includes The Captioned
`ABC News, now in its seventh year as the only
`national news program available to deaf audiences.
`The United States is now on the verge of some
`fundamental decisions in regard to a teletext stan(cid:173)
`dard. Although the FCC has yet to take a position on
`the issue, American concern for captioning suggests
`that there will be active interest in incorporating
`captioning into the teletext system. The remainder of
`this paper suggests the particular advantages teletext
`will provide for captioning, and proceeds to give some
`suggestions for teletext design which reflect caption(cid:173)
`ing requirements.
`
`The teletext advantage: Display systems
`WGBH's captioning experience spans seven years
`and several system generations. Our current opera(cid:173)
`tions are founded on a hard-disc computer system
`tied directly
`to a broadcast-quality character
`generator. All our approaches, including the current
`one have been of the open caption variety; i.e., the
`entire audience, not just the target consumers, see
`the captions. We have good evidence, both empirical
`and informal, that the general public does not like
`open captions, and that hearing viewers tend to shy
`away from programs which look "special" in this
`way.
`
`Our colleagues at the National Captioning
`Institute are working with the line 21 closed cap(cid:173)
`tioning system. They therefore avoid the open cap(cid:173)
`tioning general audience problem we have faced, and
`brisk decoder sales indicate that hearing-impaired
`people are responding to the line 21 approach.
`All of us involved in creating captioning would
`therefore agree that one of the major advantages of
`teletext is that it is "hidden." You only see the
`captions if you choose to.
`WGBH's research and experimentation sug(cid:173)
`gest that there are a number of other advantages
`unique to the teletext approach to captioning. We
`have had the opportunity to work directly with the
`ANTIOPE system, producing captioned versions of
`several public and commercial television programs.
`We have carefully studied British approaches at the
`BBC and the IBA, and had a look at Telidon in
`February at the Toronto SMPTE conference. It ap(cid:173)
`pears to us that all these teletext schemes offer the
`following technical advantages for captioned broad(cid:173)
`casting:
`1.
`The structure of teletext, its magazine format,
`allows a large number of simultaneous captioning
`
`and subtitling "tracks." The Multi-level Captioning
`Project at the WGBH Caption Center has demon(cid:173)
`strated already the value, and the appeal, of different
`captioning styles for different target audiences.
`Specifically, children, pre-lingually deaf people, and
`older people who have lost some or all of their hearing
`later in life, constitute highly dissimilar populations
`with widely divergent vocabulary and reading skills.
`Multiple teletext magazines will make it possible to
`broadcast more specialized captioned versions for
`each of these groups.
`
`Teletext allows captioning at several language
`levels, including verbatim ...
`
`. .. and simplified versions, edited for vocabulary and
`syntax.
`
`The same story applies, with increasing sig(cid:173)
`nificance,
`to verbatim subtitling accompanying
`television programs. Spanish-speaking people, who
`will form the largest U.S. minority group within a
`few years, have become a more insistent pro(cid:173)
`gramming concern due to the recent dramatic influx
`of Cubans. At a first cut, teletext will provide the
`capacity for a Spanish-language version of both
`national and regional programming. More imagina(cid:173)
`tively, however, it will also be possible to create
`different Spanish magazines, accommodating the
`substantial variations between Puerto Rican and
`
`PMC Exhibit 2054
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Blatt, Rosch, Osterer: The Promise of Teletext for Hearing-Impaired Audiences
`
`719
`
`south-western dialects. At the same time, other
`regional language groups, such as French-speaking
`people in New Hampshire and Portuguese people in
`Boston, could lobby with their local broadcasters for
`subtitled versions in their own native languages.
`
`captioning, draw false analogies from subtitling. One
`of the most common such false assumptions is that
`captions always occur in the center of the lower third
`of the screen. In subtitling applications, the viewer
`can hear which character, even off screen, is speak(cid:173)
`ing, and needs to know only the content. But hearing(cid:173)
`impaired audiences must be given more explicit cues
`about who is uttering which captions, and variable
`placement is probably the most important tool we
`have to meet this need.
`
`Some of these same considerations apply to
`3.
`other teletext characteristics. Systematic variations
`in both foreground and background color, for
`example, can help to clarify the attribution of
`
`Teletext page capacity permits foreign language
`subtitling, including Spanish ...
`
`Color and font size options also contribute to
`orienting the viewer.
`captions to speakers. A range of font sizes is also
`useful: Small characters can be used for identifiers,
`and for significant non-dialogue cues, such as
`laughter or applause. The double height option
`available on most teletext sys terns aids reading of the
`main captions, particularly for older viewers, who
`may suffer some visual impairment in addition to
`hearing impairment.
`It has been widely noted that many teletext
`4.
`features, such as textual news, weather, bulletins,
`and announcements, will be of special service to
`hearing-impaired users. There is also, however, a
`nontrivial interaction between captioning specifi(cid:173)
`cally and the depth of other teletext information
`features. One of the greatest challenges in captioning
`programs is to give viewers adequate background
`information while keeping pace with the dialogue
`and action. Separate teletext pages will allow cap(cid:173)
`tioners to create program-related introductory texts
`which hearing-impaired people can sample at their
`leisure prior to the start of a broadcast. These pages
`might feature such information as definitions of
`unfamiliar terms, summaries of previous episodes,
`explanation of the color-coding scheme to be used in
`the program captioning, and descriptions of the
`multi-level linguistic scheme.
`
`... and French translations.
`2.
`Most teletext systems afford the captioner
`complete freedom in the screen placement of text.
`Many people, unfamiliar with the requirements of
`
`Placement variation provides cues for attributing
`dialogue to the correct speaker.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2054
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 3
`
`

`
`720
`
`IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol. CE-26, November 1980
`
`5. While it is easy to make too much of this
`feature, it should be noted that a teletext graphics
`capability can directly serve captioning needs. At
`WGBH, we have frequently used the power of our
`computer-based character generator to create un(cid:173)
`usual effects for special programming purposes. We
`have, for example, made the words of songs move in
`rhythm with the music, "painted on" captions a
`character at a time, and added image-effects by
`keying slides into the program video. Many of these
`techniques may prove too taxing for a time-shared
`teletext broadcast source, but graphics effects can
`provide another route to the same end.
`
`miss out on a great deal of useful information from
`newspapers and magazines, with obvious conse(cid:173)
`quences for socialization, employment, and citizen(cid:173)
`ship. We believe that the general information capa(cid:173)
`city of teletext will be as important as captioning
`per se
`in bringing deaf Americans
`into
`the
`mainstream of society. Because information will be
`so available--0n television-and so accessible-in
`simple vocabulary and syntax written for the
`screen-teletext will help to penetrate the isolation
`hearing-impaired people are often forced to endure.
`Finally, there are many information needs
`9.
`which are indeed peculiar to the hearing-impaired
`community. There is a substantial but clearly
`minority interest in such events as signed perfor(cid:173)
`mances, TDD services, and deaf club meetings. In the
`past, hearing-impaired people have frustrated both
`themselves and local broadcasters with their desire
`for television announcements and reports of special
`interests. Broadcasters quite reasonably contend that
`air time and production facilities are simply too
`expensive to respond to these needs. Without radio
`and without general telephone service, however,
`hearing-impaired people have nowhere else to turn.
`Teletext, with its numerous, inexpensive, ephemeral
`pages, is perfectly suited to meet these special
`communications needs of hearing-impaired citizens.
`
`The teletext advantage: Socioeconomic factors
`In addition to its technological merits, teletext has
`other attractions as a delivery system for program
`captioning. Making television fully accessible to
`hearing-impaired people is a social goal, one founded
`on concepts of equity and of "mainstreaming." The
`latter term refers to the policy of integrating disabled
`people as closely as possible into the general patterns
`of American social life. From the perspectives of both
`social justice and social policy, implementing cap(cid:173)
`tioning via a teletext system offers these advantages:
`6.
`Teletext decoders will be marketed to and pur(cid:173)
`chased by the general television public. Hearing(cid:173)
`impaired people will benefit directly from partici-
`pating in such a mass market. All the constraints
`attached to the current closed caption decoder-fixed
`high price, single source of availability, inconvenient
`purchase and service provisions-will disappear
`when captioning can be received by means of a
`general purpose
`teletext decoder. Competition
`among television component manufacturers will
`assure a diversity of models, sources, and support
`services. Market studies indicate that the teletext
`decoder may cost as much as the line 21 decoder
`(currently $2501, but mass production and competi(cid:173)
`tion will deliver increasing performance curves for
`the same outlay.
`7. We are all familiar with a friend or relative
`who won't admit that he or she needs glasses, or a
`cane, or a hearing aid. There is still a stigma attached
`to devices which aid us in overcoming our handicaps.
`A line 21 decoder is just such a device, and there are
`undoubtedly cases, particularly among older people
`who are losing their hearing, in which the benefits of
`captioning are not perceived to outweigh the stigma
`of a specialized appliance. A teletext decoder, on the
`other hand, will serve the general public; owning one
`will connote normal, even positive status, and not a
`handicap.
`Attractive page designs, with adequate blank
`8.
`Because speech is so important to language 2.
`learning, deaf people tend to have moderate or severe spaces, create a need for higher character density in
`deficiencies in reading skills. They therefore tend to
`those areas used for text. The same principle applies
`
`Design considerations
`For all these reasons-technical, social, and eco(cid:173)
`nomic-we are persuaded that teletext promises the
`brightest future for captioning and other services
`targeted to hearing-impaired people. With this com(cid:173)
`mitment, and on the basis of our captioning experi(cid:173)
`ence, we have identified certain features that we
`consider essential in an optimal teletext system. We
`have submitted these to the Electronic Industries
`Association (EIA) Broadcast Television Systems
`Subcommittee on Teletext, for consideration in the
`formulation of an American teletext standard. They
`are offered here in the hope that circuit designers,
`receiver engineers and manufacturers, and other
`interested professionals will ·find · them useful in
`planning teletext encoding and decoding equipment.
`
`For both the writer and the viewer, complete
`I.
`flexibility in the composition and layout of every
`frame is the key to successful captioning. Nothing
`must be allowed to impinge upon the creativ~ free(cid:173)
`dom of an editor or designer in laying out· a text
`display. Specifically, teletext encoding schemes in
`which the control characters require printing spaces
`would severely detract from the service.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2054
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Blatt. Rosch. Osterer: The Promise of Teletext for Hearing- Impaired Audiences
`
`721
`
`national captioning for network programs and re(cid:173)
`gional or station captioning for local programs.
`8.
`Like most public broadcasters, WGBH pro(cid:173)
`grams for considerably less than 24 hours every day.
`During non-programming periods, enormous quanti(cid:173)
`ties of specialized information could be transmitted
`to minority audiences, including hearing-impaired
`people. An ideal teletext system will incorporate
`provisions for a full-frame transmission mode, capa(cid:173)
`ble of such high density service, and a decoder with
`programmable frame-grabbing and local storage func·
`tions, so that minority audiences can seek and re(cid:173)
`trieve specially targeted pages.
`
`Summary
`
`Hidden captioning promises to make television, the
`central information medium in American life, in(cid:173)
`creasingly a.vailable to hearing-impaired people.
`Teletext appears
`to offer a superior technical
`approach to hidden captioning, together with a
`number of other services which are responsive to the
`unique
`information needs of hearing-impaired
`people. A properly conceived teletext system will
`expand the range and facilitate the use of these
`services for both programmers and viewers.
`
`Joseph Blatt is producer of The Captioned ABC
`News, a nationally televised production of WGBH/
`Boston, where he is also senior researcher for teletext.
`A graduate of Harvard College, Mr. Blatt also holds a
`Master's degree from Harvard Graduate School of
`Education, where from 1971to1976 he was director
`of the Media Division. In 1977-78 Mr. Blatt produced
`Feeling Free, a PBS series dealing with chil(cid:173)
`dren's awareness of disabilities. Mr. Blatt is the
`author of several articles on
`television and
`disabilities, and the co-author of two children's
`books.
`
`to captioning, where the goal is to obscure as little of
`the primary video as possible. At the same time, we
`have determined in the course of our own research
`that character height is crucial to legibility. We
`therefore advocate a system featuring variable font
`sizes, with options for increased character height.
`3.
`The chief special requirement engendered by
`captioning is the need for transmissions in precise
`time relationship with the accompanying television
`program. From an operational point of view, the ideal
`teletext system would offer these timing character(cid:173)
`istics:
`
`a. automatic updating;
`b. completely flexible time code assignments,
`approaching as nearly as possible the limit of frame(cid:173)
`by-frame changes;
`
`c. simple editorial procedures for entering both
`time in and time out codes; and
`
`d. provision for "on the fly" marking of time in
`and time out caption change points.
`4.
`Beyond time code handling routines, a cap(cid:173)
`tioning editorial console for teletext must retain the
`flexibility of the most advanced character generators.
`Among the most important of these features are:
`a. automatic row and page centering;
`
`b. programmable settings (and defaults) for
`foreground and background colors, and for font sizes;
`c. block text movements, both left/right and up/
`down; and
`d. automatic frame number incrementing.
`Captioning must of course be legible against
`5.
`the program video, but most viewers prefer displays
`which block as little as possible of the original scene.
`To avoid the inflexibility and unattractiveness of
`black-box "label" style captions, a "misted," semi(cid:173)
`transparent background scheme should be available.
`The IBA's Oracle teletext system has already demon(cid:173)
`strated this technique.
`
`Teletext specifications should include tech(cid:173)
`6.
`niques for introducing special symbols as requied for
`particular captioning purposes. We have relied regu(cid:173)
`larly, for example, on a musical clef sign to denote the
`words of a song. Effects already achieved with a
`"down-loaded" graphic alphabet suggest that sym(cid:173)
`bols can be readily accommodated within a teletext
`format.
`
`Because public broadcasting is primarily a
`7.
`local system, we have a special receptivity to cap(cid:173)
`tioning initiatives on the part of individual stations.
`The cost of teletext origination and transmission
`equipment must be kept low enough to encourage
`
`PMC Exhibit 2054
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 5
`
`

`
`722
`
`IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol. CE-26, November 1980
`
`Gary Rosch is with the Common Carrier Bureau of
`the Federal Communications Commission. He has
`served as the Chairman of the CCITT Videotex
`Working Party of Study Group I. Mr. Rosch holds the
`MBA and JD degrees. Since the writing of this paper,
`Mr. Rosch has left the FCC to join Antiope Videotex
`Systems as staff counsel. The views expressed are not
`necessarily those of the FCC.
`
`Carole_Osterer is the director of the·Caption Center
`at WGBH/Boston. Ms. Osterer has been involved in
`captioning since 1973, when she worked as a lan(cid:173)
`guage specialist/captioner on Captioned ZOOM.
`Since then Ms. Osterer has been associate producer of
`The Captioned ABC News and special projects
`manager. She holds a Master's degree from Boston
`University in deaf education.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2054
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket