`United States Patent
`4,965,825
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Oct. 23, 1990
`Harvey et al.
`
`[54]
`
`SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS AND
`METHODS
`
`.......................... 380/9
`4,704,725 11/1987 Harvey et al.
`4,706,282 11/1987 Knowd ............................... .. 380/49
`
`Primary Examz‘ner——Salvatore Cangialosi
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Thomas J. Scott, Jr.
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A unified system of programming communication for
`use on individual computer systems with capacity for
`generating relevant user specific information simulta-
`neously at each station of a plurality of subscriber sta-
`tions. The system includes a transmission station which
`is a central control system of a system of receiver station
`computers controlled by the station transmission. Each
`individual computer system is self-structuring in that
`any given transmission station can transmit control
`information causing selected apparatus at selected re-
`ceiver stations to combine the computers at those sta-
`tions based on the transmission of the station, thereby '
`causing the individual computers to come under control
`of station. The unified system also includes apparatus
`for combining the user specific information generated at
`subscriber station into broadcast programming, so that
`broadcast programming is displayed at every station
`with user specific information displayed in the broad-
`cast programming. The unified system includes appara-
`tus for restricting the combined programming so that it
`is available only at selected stations tuned to a given
`transmission station’s transmission. The unified system
`includes apparatus for documenting the use of the con-
`trol signals and/or programming at said selected sta-
`tions and for monitoring the availability and use, of
`programming.
`
`25 Claims, 21 Drawing Sheets
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors:
`
`[73]
`
`Assignee:
`
`John C. Harvey; James W. Cuddihy,
`both of New York, N.Y.
`The Personalized Mass Media
`Corporation, New York, N.Y.
`
`121]
`
`[22]
`
`Appl. No.2 96,096
`Filed:
`Sep. 11, 1987
`
`[631
`
`[51]
`152]
`
`[5 8]
`
`[56]
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 829,531, Feb. 14, 1986,
`Pat. No. 4,704,725, which is a continuation of Ser. No.
`317,510, Nov. 3, 1981, Pat. No. 4,694,490.
`
`Int. Cl.5 ...................... .. H04-L 9/00; G06F 15/21
`U.S. Cl. .......................................... 380/9; 380/10;
`380/49; 364/521
`Field of Search ................ 380/9, 10, 20, 48, 49;
`455/4, 32-34, 37, 7 , 358/142, 143, 146, 147,
`133, 86; 364/521
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`.. 380/23
`3,845,391 10/1974 Crosby .... ..
`. 358/23
`3,891,792
`6/1975 Kimura .............
`.. 358/84
`.
`4,025,851
`5/1977 Haselwood et al.
`358/103
`4,138,726 2/1979 Girault et al. ........
`358/ 143
`4,264,925 4/1981 Freeman et al
`358/143
`4,310,854
`l/1982 Baer .....................
`380/20
`4,323,922 4/1982 de Toonder et al.
`. 358/83
`4,337,480
`6/1982 Bourassin et al.
`.. 358/86
`4,381,522
`4/1983 Lambert ......... ..
`4,694,490
`9/1987 Harvey et al.
`........................ .. 380/9
`
`
`
`MJl.Tl~CHAMEL CABLESYSTEM
`
`250
`
`ZOO
`
`llEARTH
`STATIM
`SITELLITE
`M
`_;7°z~.5':‘7~-~1
`L___
`
`
`
` rrutffiw-
`
`'T:‘:::-‘
`i}1$’
`/5
`11111255 F“ ._
`11;“
`293
`/& ii“:
`.
`}i'IiI
`299
`
`,I|In| ll!
`1''!”
`1,1,1!
`lg.-.-L_:.
`PROGRAMMING
`———- CUVTROUNFORMATION
`+++m<m+H- SMTCH CONTROL INSTRUCHONS
`
`
`
`In” 1'
`
` [I o o|"'i' 1 %[ill]
`
`.
`.
`:§_',_:{>..o-
`;{g'"'=4
`::::''~-'
`1
`
`'"- ares L--1
`
`
`
`
`
`o rvssro
`22’
`PRINTER
`
`1
`I
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 1
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 1
`
`
`
`5.
`
`US. Patent
`
`099
`
`w_.n
`
`n
`
`23,56
`
`M§.&H.ism32%E.
`
`So
`
`um.”_S..=o§§=an>
`
`9’I4..2...
`
`1,EosaBE22E.O3:<z2m_>m....:
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 2
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 1990
`
`Sheet 2 of 22
`
`4,965,825
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 3
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 1990
`
`Sheet 3 of 22
`
`53,5/U9,4
`
`22222222Cl!
`
`22292222822
`
`
`
`222229222
`
`22222..>2.
`
`2222222222.
`
`
`
`2222232222222222.
`
`N.2222222222822
`
`22222252IIIlllllllil.:___:___r2222222222222222228lllllllllL_Fr2
`
`
`22222223.I__r.J22____.2._.
`
`22222.2211.11_________22228222
`
`222222._______fl_2o2<.:a8
`..:_________
`
`2222222281.I:II|IL_
`
`
`2222222_____;_:222228222.22
`
`
`
`Ill.I!..I|____:_2222222222222
`
`__.____.
`
`____
`
`/
`
`\\\\
`
`.2922222222
`
`2222222
`
`..:...S=
`
`.
`
`22222
`
`2222822
`
`22.7.=.2.
`
`222m'Nfi
`
`
`
`292222222.35.200IIIIilullllul.-
`-
`
`22.222282222222222III.
`
`.2522..22222228_2222222222222
`
`.222222N022222222
`
`222222222
`
`SEQ2222222
`
`MD.
`
`m
`22CA
`MmP
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 4
`
`
`
`
`
`mmPSU
`
`na.0
`
`rm4d8
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`WE32228«chews.,.m>m..mmmu._<.:o3me:
`
`.m._E§a2:5mofififim
`
`State
`
`£..._“...#_
`
`camE.oIMIOVzozséfiz.mega:+.+_+_£+Tmsszzpnzmzfiqzem
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hqmqnmm9E5420:35.82..5528I|.|msezxue
`
`
`
`
`o2:._<2$mQ53....mEqm_2<=§§8EQflqzemIrulmsezruflo2_=<z...a89>.._.<:.:&n.
`
`aw.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 5
`
`
`
`21.DmPQMU
`
`Oct. 23, 1990
`
`Sheet 5 of 22
`
`4,965,825
`
`3
`
`3.we3
`
`_|I||||.|Iu|.I|._|.[||ulll.|.|II|.lIu‘lu_.I.|||I|.|l.ll-||uII:_
`
`..§ea
`
`8828
`
`E.=§=u
`
`$>.mBm
`
`05$:
`
`
`
`mm.o.mzo:s§o.._z:oEz8-|l
`
`m.=;§mQ2<2§:§8El
`
`
`
`zo:§mo..;=mesa:+...+_+
`
`:.8 ,S
`
`45.53
`
`mobmto
`
`Esoma
`
`fismfiz
`
`E28
`
`umQC
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 1999
`
`Sheet 6Iof 22
`
`4,965,825
`
`ssuscnao
`FREQUENCY
`
`29
`‘ ___
`ssuscnso
`
`'Lo£cooER"'
`rm;-ousucy
`(FIG. 2A,2B I
`I-—'— ""L°_".§E’_
`1
`28
`'
`
`,
`
`SELECW:-D
`
`FREQUENCY
`
`osooosre
`(FIG. 2A,2e, Ililqglnnng
`
`
`
`I,-2- °“2°’ mIn
`
`<"r7§9§E‘§e, II-an-In-II:
`on 2c}
`
`0gI;gr;g,Tggo~
`
`omen STATION
`APARATUS
`
`OTHER smnom
`APARATUS
`
`26
`
`‘r’I£u‘§u:ssaou -
`
`.
`
`'
`
`ggurggg
`T"
`30
`_
`,..__.,..__,._
` JACK PORTS
`17 I"
`
`I Ir‘
`mexrsnma.
`1‘
`
`, {IF
`EQUIPMENT
`I
`OTHER
`
`INPUTS
`
`
`'.T..T_“‘-"""'__-
`
`
`
` Am-0
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`,‘I
`
`0')
`
`24
`
`.
`
`PRIIM
`DMLER
`mm 1
`TELEPHONE
`carmscnou
`
`22
`
`.
`
`_
`0RT5% €fl
`'
`W335;
`N
`i"— SIGNALS 5 PROGRAMMING
`- —- —-'— CONTROL INFORMATION
`++I-H+H-I- MONITOR INFORMATION
`
`COMPARATOR
`
`ll
`
`_
`
`_
`
`. OTHER
`INPUTS
`
`FIG. 20 ‘
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page
`
`1'
`I
`hr.
`'1
`H:
`In
`JACK PORT
`TO EXTERNAL‘!!!
`EQUIPMENT,
`I}
`-
`I
`
`
`
`I
`
`....j—__j
`
`4°
`
`2""
`¢
`0'4
`I ‘
`I
`
`3 '
`I
`
`,....__..._
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 7
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 1990 I
`
`Sheet
`
`of 22
`
`4,965,825
`
`INFORMATION
`METER-MONITOR
`EXECUTION
`SEGMENT
`SEGMENT
`HEADER SEGMENT
`r*’
`r*T—“”‘*T“““‘““”‘—_“1
`OIOIOOIIOIOOOIOIIOIIIOOOIO
` ___A_,J
`momma
`COMMAND
`W3
`F I G . 2E
`
`SECOND
`rmsr
`FORMAT
`omen new
`omen new
`new
` *’:*"-j—%
`OIOIIIOIIIIOOIOIOIOOOIIOOOOOI
`
`A
`
`Lw_A,J
`LENGTH REMAINING BITS OF
`TOKEN THE FORMAT FIELD
`
`FIG. 2F
`
`COMMAND
`
`
`HEADER EXEC SEG
`METH?-MONITOR SEG
`
`OOOIOIOOOIOOOOIOOIIOI
`\___V__,%.,_____;
`FIRST BYTE
`SECOND BYTE
`
`FIG.2G
`
`COMMAND
`
`
`HEADER EXEC SE6
`METER-MONITOR SEG
` _j_Ai___fi
`OOOIOIOOOIOOOOIOOIIOIOOO
`g?,_j.4____.,___L___,.___/
`FIRST BYTE
`SECOND BYTE ‘
`THIRD BYTE
`
`FIG. 2H
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 8
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 1990
`
`Sheet 8 of 22
`
`4,965,825
`
`PADDING BITS
`
`so:-'s1sNAL
`
`PADDING BITS
`
`COMMAND {INFORMATION sscmsmr
`
`5
`
`°°M“A:":°
`
`< :°9MM‘”°
`
`EE
`MESSAGE
`3
`<MEésAGE
`
`MESSAGE
`
`F I G. 2 I
`
`EXEC. SEG
`HEADER
`r—’%r--'%\
`IOOIOOOO
`s_____%,:..__1
`ONE BYTE
`
`MESSAGE
`
`‘
`
`COMMAND
`
`PADDING BITS
`METER-MONITOR SEG.
`HEADER EXECSEG.
` __fi?»;j
`OOOIOIOOIIOOIOOOII I I I II I III I I IIIOOOOOOOO
`
`Ist BYTE
`
`2nd BYTE
`
`3rd BYTE
`
`4th BYTE
`
`5fl1 BYTE
`
`FIG. 2K
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 9
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 23_, 1990
`
`Sheet 9 of 22
`
`4,965,825
`
`//_,.
`
`
`
`215
`
`I
`
`202M
`
`--2-1-205
`
`
`o
`
`o
`
`
`
`
`205C
`
`mcnocoupursn
`
`203
`
`A
`
`coumousn
`
`TVSIGNAL '”‘“3
`owmsn
`(FIG-24)
`
`SIGNALS
`ONLY
`
`_I
`
`I'-
`I
`Ijj.
`
`i
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 1
`
`53r‘I=TUF§'I
`40
`.
`_ __ ___ ..-.
`5,5:
`9 21m Raotoslsmu
`6.0 . 5
`
`
`I ‘ ,HLL1[_______”£
`
`_......._..__JT"‘_—
`53T<'23rUr;§§
`“WW5” :
`3!
`‘#9: {”r:::::::::::'
`
`fir---_.‘_—_—:4 14 '- 31:59
`
`18
`
`-
`
`II
`
`n
`
`I
`
`me c5"h‘I2'3um E6
`24 -mu
`renepnoms
`2' 16
`'
`CONNECTIM
`
`'
`
`T£L£moNI:
`OREIJIHER DATA
`NETW
`
`”‘°°“”"'
`.
`
`‘
`
`II _J
`'
`O;-HER
`“
`
`J
`
`‘
`
`200
`\.
`
`NULTP
`TRANSMISSION’
`
`.
`
`~
`N
`
`FIG.3
`
`SIGNALS 8 PROGRAMMING
`_
`.
`— -- - -- CONTROL INFORMATION
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 10
`
`
`
`S
`
`-«mm«mm-E55
`
`~E..\..3m_355R.rmobmbdmma._Etam.PmmxSmu..mmmam
`
`
`msmsom_man__2.ESQ_meafiaM. _III.Ill.Il|||lHHH.:||l||uH.lHI.H..n|_E28Ew 1"___9.__1_am___km2”,
`«sambaMIImm$.mE%m$8E.$.58mommuomqm3§
`
`
`>§m§z8>aEm%8__355
`
`llsufimmmmowmom___wm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`H|..l:ln|m.IU..IW:aIun|..Hl.||IHM.|P|h.:.H.HHS39E28
`
`
`
` ,mT‘--I-_m1:1:_$Rm--_
`
`_mE§E%
`
`
`
`.4.Us.8.E§E28Em:2:EEO
`
`
`
`8.“.mommmuoi.=§§m
`..3E32:2829$
`.mtis
`
`5.&zfiwa§a%§-Ewow..%mm.8m%~§:E.
`
`
`
`59m.5Eqqzouxmmufimwmmooomm
`
`«mwm%®%mm.u..fi%%E.mE§s..§8:.E%mSm.%mm.8E3E_\mw\K4aSm.%mm8E5.3%to
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 11
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 11
`
`
`
`
`..lDmPSU
`
`0
`
`5
`
`@:E§mnx_E§mex\\mIam
`
`&5.252
`
`
`am“_II|[J—2EN8m .1,mzoiflfi6|Il|l..I|ll|l.|H||..I.||..||l....I||l||....I...l.|l:||I||.||9.W..H:....4....:.uI.|I..|.....:HHHHH..I.i_._4 |IHIHI.IH.iIm..flu
`
`t____I
`
`momwwwwwm__*_“Em_2__f__rmotéaaMan...
`:5I!fiaama_
`
`8“___5EE::o8S_:__FII.I
`
`ENEN
`
`.
`
`$:E>z8$23$Em>z8
`
`
`
`x8x8
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`zemezmzst2396.396._m22<:o-C.S2
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 12
`
`
`
`
`tnmD...SU
`__
`
`Oct. 23, 1990
`
`Sheet 12 of 22
`__
`
`_rafim_E_Ema.mm.
`1ll_IL_rEm.me\\
`1II|_4|._.:n;=TNmmxrESP.
`
`LSN
`
`mm><.E
`
`
`mmmfimm.Em>ZOU
`xmaEEm>amwxom
`
`
`Ia?mmfimE_mm>Sm_munmoommQmmwmommmuomn.luuIlIua....HaH.l.na.i.rImm_2a_g.nation. __+.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_1_Hu+u...;i+£+:llllllllllI14IIII1..rllnuzmmlnnnnnnnnnnnnnIn
`
`
`«.Iulmf._Iwl~nlllllllKnw_III.E__fimmw@»oL_mamwwmam§§&§_sNa1._mmmk
`
` 3:eaN8
`
`
`
`
`
`2o_mm.zm2<EHmqod22<:o-:..s§
`
`
`
`
`
`m.u..._2o:§%..=sSE28!1:20:35.82.motzosiim2.2z<%cEl.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 1
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 13
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 1990
`
`Sheet 13 of 22
`
`4,965,825
`
`.ozmem:sm=m>w-.flm<u_Emwm_.w_fi&%omm.B_2oE.m_Ema
`
`mu.mommmuoma._<zo_m
`
`
`
`mm462%)
`
`
`
`xE...<s_mm_..=.E2<...
`rossmonan
`
`mmaz39_.
`
`
`
`
`
`2oESE2....L_mm.xrlIIINE>mommn.
`
`9389>._.-..zo_msm._E
`
`oa:<
`
`E_..3ms_<
`
`mm
`
`E>Emz
`
`:25ESE
`
`Endsqm
`
`
`
`&v&u.._.<zo_m—@O0\\EK.111!I.s.Em>m
`
`
`
`2%mw_._Em§<u_mmamommm>ssom..=s_.
`
`ES%=ouw%2_sz<mmm_.m_
`
`mmdomhzou«mafiamw.\FIIIIIL.
`
`
`sqzwommM58.m_<2Qm.<0.0_A_.
`
`xommuuommSpsaqosmm
`
`
`
`
`
`Till-<»<%2%._wmo._mmolluuofizzqmoommozqm._<2o_mllll
`
`
`
`mm.(mm=.:.omom2o:mm._m._..8).xmoabzm.utm2<E2ot<Smo.._2_35200IIII!
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`E0252mEmz<E<...<o
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 1
`
`.,§__.2_
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 14
`
`
`
`
`PSU
`
`Ll
`
`Oct. 23, 1990
`
`Sheet 14 of 22
`
`4,965,825
`
` zo_s:.m_m~..»..mm\HmAHHmm(\o.m..._u._m<uAHHH3mmxm.E:.S2_Hmsn.:.m>m__ozémsooH__H_.
`
`._u2z<:o
`
`
`
`.329»HYEQQ\”_hasm.=;§m
`mommuoomuV_ix2<~%.m«m
`
`mmtizoum Imm._._oE.z8
`
`mO._.<.5QOE
`
`._m..2<:o
`
`
`
`.m._m<u
`
`mOh<.SQO2
`
`._9.Z<IU
`
`m._m<o
`
`mmmmesm
`
`..<zo.m
`
`.<~.o...:8.E<mmzmonm..m&_Em3mmooomo
`
`
`
`._<2o_m._<zo_m
`
`>._.
`
`.I.Illl.I.I..IlInI'nllnIIII-|l|IIn|'I
`
`.3.I11...._..__.5._H._H_r\_...4:.
`
`F....u:|uL.ruuuu1!...p_:I..nnL.FuuuuIL
`
`
`
`..III.._.III».1Il|+lIl.ull—w.||_.llIl.......L..8.am.
`
`IIIIIIIIIIIIIIL
`
`.IIL
`
`_
`
`
`
`
`
`mmNm._E...|l©vulllllll.|IIIIIIIIIIL.
`
`
`
`ozmoqu...su.8>mM4930_.IIIIIII..
`
`
`-.||||||c‘|: | | ' .
`IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIll...
`
`
`
`F"'-"“"'_""__""-"'-""'_"
`
`20¢...
`
`<mOE
`
`8t\Eiomomzoxnmzfi
`
`
`
`éogmzmmcmzfitE3moGI
`
`..E:20m..<zo.m39.:\\\muFzusiaom._<2mmtG
`..
`
`
`
`
`.|II||I...|u|I.‘..-l|III‘.||.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 1
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`S
`
`0
`
`
`
`
`
`.smcwa.”:m<od2z<:o-E:2
`
`.w.oEmE<mmum.
`._0o_____aamU____£_0.
`o_o<m:____8moEwflomN__amoebaEmExam9Now.505:
`SmM8m
`
`
`HHllu..Il..n:1....llI_u._._:uH.InuH:lM:uHI:.WHuM.|h:M:W.:WHlHuIU.nw..W|lHIWI..Hl:|.H.HhI_9I ___HnII....hHnIJJJ__4\.omN|:____InlllWmI
`
`
`______..m.HH|IWlIh.:.H».HnIhIIn.H..:H:HHHIh.HHH.|...H..:________________7..°muuuuuuuunmflmmmw
`5mu&.mzo:o:Emz_._oE.20ozossm.._._+..I+I...I.
`
`
`
`
`l....:lw2§2<mooE9NE“.2o:<sEo.._z:oE2ool.I|.l5.1llllll
`_____Tmam0__mmmm&_Em._____5:E§m_..ézem___1_x_E<s___..___\\wsm:m>m_____tmotéouo____\hEvammm_____.u____mmm.Sozaod____3.”.ma.
`
`_________zefimzmo_L_:_2._<>§mtm..:b.____H,_III!
`
`5532___«mm.IIIL9_l__=..)___._|I.l_WIIIJ9] ::=)-lilE.<m<mm<fl-I1,.l.a....mmma....“fimnulB_..5n:$5.5.8:3.___.:1.F
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_..__...|.l|$Sn§8....
`
`
`
`a.._.E.m%_______\._.5950
`
`_...m_sfr._mM2%......_,__._..___“H__.._.__...........II.....|.I.
`
`___2%E____\\
`
`
`4____________m§&§_m:.=_____
`
`anV0.a..me6PMmmCAW
`Mmmm.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 16
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 1990
`
`Sheet 16 of 22
`
`4,965,825
`
`MULTI-CHANNEL CABLE TRANSMISSION
`
`2OI
`
`
`
`
`
`CABLE
`CONVERTER
`BOX
`
`ONE TV
`CHANNEL 202
`
`
`
`SIGNAL
`PROCESSOR
`
`
`
`TV SET 0
`
`
`
`uscoom I 303
`(FIG 2A)
`
`TV SIGNAL
`
`
`
`
`
`%
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`206
`
`
`
`FURNACE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WINDOW
`Am
`CON]I_Jf:ITIONING
`gf5gm%AND
`Y
`
`S S M
`MEANS
`
`
`PROGRAMMING
`
`"‘ — —" -' CONTROL INFORMATION
`
`FIG.7A
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 17
`
`
`
`pm3U
`
`11
`
`h
`
`2
`
`5&
`
`\\\\
`
`9x\m\\\3.2:\\\m8mmommmuS:
`
`0m2o=nm.Ema_my.|l|.||l_
`S_:25..._m..tm2<EE3Ii5:8mo
`
`mEooumo_.m355E_H.0mmP._w_
`
`_Il|.lI:.|
`
`_!
`
`Sm
`
`A",25.8%Ill
`
`No,asu....2o:§%..=,:SE28I11!
`
`5,2o:§EEE$562TIITT
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 1
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 18
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 23, 1990
`
`Sheet 18 of 22
`
`4,965,825
`
`MULTI CHANNEL CABIJE TRANSMISSION
`
`201
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CABLE
`CONVERTER
`BOX
`
`SIGNAL
`PROCESSOR
`
`ONE
`311%”
`
`SIG .
`o~LY
`
`
`
`CHANNEL
`
`282
`
`TV SIGNAL
`
`DECODER I
`
`CABLE
`CONVBYTER
`BOX
`
`ONE TV
`CHANNEL
`
`215
`
`
`
`
`
`TUNER
`
`205
`
`TV MONITOR
` 202M
`
`
`TELEPHONE OR
`
`TRANSFER
`“E7-WORK
`
`‘
`
`DECODER
`
`VI DEO
`
`
`
`
`
`RECORDEIV
`
`pLAyER
`TV SIGNAL
`DECODER
`
`
`
`
`
`217
`
`PRINTER
`
`221
`
`PROGRAMMING
`— — — CONTROL INFORMATION
`
`278
`
`FIG. 7C
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 1
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 19
`
`
`
`..lHmD...SU
`
`Am
`
`W
`
`.mhS
`
`m.
`
`5289563,4
`
`
`
`o>42ommqoumamufixqqz
`
`E6_m
`
`B.
`
`
`
`Mmmwmmmummmazzq
`
`ES.§8oEs
`
`mm3838
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 2
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 20
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`swam
`
`$8
`
`.
`
`Easa
`
`.moaie53.
`
`mhS
`
`22r1
`
`523,56.
`
`MSmor:
`
`2Enema2
`
`99.4_.
`
`EoI
`
`fi:Ezo8E_z
`
`OOI.1,EssaB3:22..
`t.2.522.3
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 21
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 21
`
`
`
`
`
`
`P3U
`
`LI.
`
`Oct. 23, 1990
`
`Sheet 21 of 22
`
`4,965
`
`I)
`
`825
`
`mi
`
`33E
`
`Enema
`
`
`
`
`
`zozqsmfis.5E2ocIIIII.MN.6~MSEEESE
`
`_52:...>5
`
`..<2Qm>5
`
`Eaooma
`
`ENQN
`
`
`
`ma$:=.E8o~§z
`
`EN
`
`8
`
`
`
`2oam.=m2<EH53.m22$c-E=z
`
`zommmuomm
`
`._<2u_m
`
`$=E>z8
`
`Bmqu
`
`xom
`
`MD.
`
`m
`mmCA
`MmP
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 2
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`B_fi_rll,.m=oEz8d25$0T8IIE.:oEz8llllIllL._.
`
`
`
`s___o_
`
`eh
`
`2_mom.a_|II..IIllL_
`
`PI-O-
`n8=9Imam5808WlummmE883
`
`
`U
`
`LI.n
`
`.em28...5%:S.
`.m289.8%ézeaEmeumma<5zozsmPzoam_:mz<EHafiz
`
`
`
`e$8:m§==8mE§<&<zozam
`
`
`
`mE§.&<6.mo_m235$1.8E0/9nQN*.**mamEmsemz5:.:83In-I-|4zozséfiz.SE28.1InI
`
`
`
`
`
`38
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 2
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 23
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS AND
`METHODS
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`This is a continuation-in-part of a patent application
`Ser. No. 829,531 filed Feb. 14, 1986 now U.S. Pat. No.
`4,704,725 which in turn was a continuation of a patent
`application Ser. No. 317,510 filed Nov. 3, 1981 now
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,694,490.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`5
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`The invention relates to an integrated system of pro-
`gramming communication and involves the fields of 15
`computer processing, computer communications, tele-
`vision, radio, and other electronic communications; the
`fields of automating the handling, recording, and re-
`transmitting of television, radio, computer, and other
`electronically transmitted programming; and the fields
`of regulating, metering, and monitoring the availability,
`use, and usage of such programming.
`For years, television has been recognized as a most
`powerful medium for communicating ideas. And televi-
`sion is so-called “user friendly”; that is, despite techni-
`cal complexity, television is easy for subscribers to use.
`Radio and electronic print services such as stock
`brokers’ so-called “tickers” and “broad tapes” are also
`powerful, user friendly mass media. (Hereinafter, the
`electronic print mass medium is called, “broadcast
`print.”)
`But television, radio, and broadcast print are only
`mass media. Program content is the same for every
`viewer. Occasionally one viewer may see, hear, or read
`information of specific relevance to him (as happens
`when a guest on a television talk show turns to the
`camera and says, “Hi, Mom”), but such electronic_
`media have no capacity for conveying user specific
`information simultaneously to each user.
`For years, computers have been recognized as having
`unsurpassed capacity for processing and displaying user
`specific information.
`But computer processing is not a mass medium. Com-
`puters operate under the control of computer programs
`that are inputted by specific users for specific purposes,
`not programs that are broadcast to and executed simul-
`taneously at the stations of mass user audiences. And
`computer processing is far less user friendly than, for
`example, television.
`Today great potential exists for combining the capac-
`ity of broadcast communications media to convey ideas
`with the capacity of computers to process and output
`user specific information. One such combination would
`provide a new radio—based or broadcast print medium
`with the capacity for conveying general information to
`large audiences-e.g., “Stock prices rose today in
`heavy trading,”—with information of specific rele-
`vance to each particular user in the audience—e.g., “but
`the value of your stock portfolio went down.”-
`(Hereinafter, the new media that result from such com-
`binations are called “combined” media.)
`Unlocking this potential is desirable because these
`new media will add substantial richness and variety to
`the communication of ideas, information and entertain-
`ment. Understanding complex subjects and making
`informed decisions will become easier.
`- To unlock this potential fully requires means and
`methods for combining and controlling receiver sys-
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4,965,825
`
`2
`tems that are now separate—television and computers,
`radio and computers, broadcast print and computers,
`television and computers and broadcast print, etc.
`But it requires much more.
`To unlock this potential fully requires a system with
`efficient capacity for satisfying the demands of subscrib-
`ers who have little receiver apparatus and simple infor-
`mation demands as well as subscribers who have exten-
`sive apparatus and complex demands. It requires capac-
`ity for transmitting and organizing vastly more informa-
`tion and programming than any one-channel transmis-
`sion system can possibly convey at one time. It requires
`capacity for controlling intermediate transmission sta-
`tions that receive information and programming from
`many sources and for organizing the information and
`programming and retransmitting the information and
`programming so as to make the use of the information
`and programming at ultimate receiver stations as effi-
`cient as possible.
`To unlock this potential also requires efficient capac-
`ity for providing reliable audit information to (1) adver-
`tisers and others who pay for the transmission and per-
`formance of programming and (2) copyright holders,
`pay service operators, and others such as talent who
`demand, instead, to be paid. This requires capacity for
`identifying and recording (1) what television, radio,
`data, and other programming and what instruction sig-
`nals are transmitted at each transmission station and (2)
`what is received at each receiver station as well as (3)
`what received programming is combined or otherwise
`used at each receiver station and (4) how it is received,
`combined, and/or otherwise used.
`Moreover,
`this system must have the capacity to
`ensure that programming supplied for pay or for other
`conditional use is used only in accordance with those
`conditions. For example, subscriber station apparatus
`must display the commercials that are transmitted in
`transmissions that advertisers pay for. The system must
`have capacity for decrypting, in many varying ways,
`programmingand instruction signals that are encrypted
`and for identifying those who pirate programming and
`inhibiting piracy.
`It is the object of this invention to unlock this great
`potential in the fullest measure by means of an inte-
`grated -system of programming communication that‘
`joins together all these capacities most efficiently.
`Computer systems generate user specific information,
`but in any given computer system, any given set of
`program instructions that causes and controls the gener-
`ation of user specific information is inputted to only one
`computer at a time.
`Computer communications systems do transmit data
`point-to-multipoint. The Dataspeed Corporation divi-
`sion of Lotus Development Corporation of Cambridge,
`Mass. transmits real-time financial data over radio fre-
`quencies to microcomputers equipped with devices
`called “modios” that combine the features of radio re-
`ceivers, modems, and decryptors. The Equatorial Com-
`munications Company of Mountain View, Calif. trans-
`mits to similarly equipped receiver systems by satellite.
`At each receiver station, apparatus receive the particu-
`lar transmission and convert its data content into unen-
`crypted digital signals that computers can process.
`Each subscriber programs his subscriber station appara-
`tus to select particular data of interest.
`This prior art is limited. It only transmits data; it does
`not control data processing. No system is prepro-
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 2
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 24
`
`
`
`4,965,825
`
`3
`grammed to simultaneously control a plurality of cen-
`tral processor units, operating systems, and pluralities of
`computer peripheral units. None has capacity to cause
`simultaneous generation of user specific information at a
`plurality of receiver stations. None has any capacity to
`cause subscriber station computers to process received
`data, let alone in ways that are not inputted by the sub-
`scribers. None has any capacity to explain automatically
`why any given information might be of particular inter-
`est to any subscriber or why any subscriber might wish
`to select information that is not selected or how any
`subscriber might wish to change the way selected infor-
`mation is processed.
`As regards broadcast media, systems in the prior art
`have capacity for receiving and displaying multiple
`images on television receivers simultaneously. One such
`system for superimposing printed characters transmit-
`ted incrementally during the vertical blanking interval
`of the television scanning format is described in U.S.
`Pat. No. 3,891,792 to Kimura, U.S. Pat. No. 4,310,854 to
`Baer describes a second system for continuously dis-
`playing readable alphanumeric captions that are trans-
`mitted as digital data superimposed on a normal FM
`sound signal and that relate in program content to the
`conventional television information upon which they
`are displayed. These systems permit a viewer to view a
`primary program and a secondary program.
`This prior art, too, is limited. It has no capacity to
`overlay any information other than information trans-
`mitted to all receiver stations simultaneously. It has no
`capacity to overlay any such information except in the
`order in which it is received. It has no capacity to cause
`receiver station computers to generate any information
`whatsoever, let alone user specific information. It has
`' no capacity to cause overlays to commence or cease
`appearing at receiver stations, let alone commence and
`cease appearing periodically.
`As regards the automation of intermediate transmis-
`sion stations, various so-called “cueing” systems in the
`prior art operate in conjunction with network broadcast
`transmissions to automate the so-called “cut-in” at local
`television and radio stations of locally originated pro-
`gramming such as so-called “local spot” advertise-
`merits.
`
`Also in the prior art, U.S. Pat. No. 4,381,522 tp Lam-
`bert describes a cable television system controlled by a
`minicomputer that responds to signals transmitted from
`viewers by telephone. In response to viewers’ input
`preferences, the computer generates a schedule which
`determines what prerecorded, so-called local origina-
`tion programs will be transmitted, when, and over what
`charmels. The computer generates a video image of this
`schedule which it transmits over one cable channel to
`viewers which permits them to see when they can View
`the programs they request and over what charmels.
`Then, in accordance with the schedule, it actuates pre-
`loaded video tape, disc or film players and transmits the
`programming transmissions from these players to the
`designated cable channels by means of a controlled
`video switch.
`This prior art, too, is limited. It has no capacity to
`schedule automatically or transmit any programming
`other than that loaded immediately at the play heads of
`the controlled video players. It has no capacity to load
`the video players or identify what programming is
`loaded on the players or verify that scheduled programs
`are played correctly. It has no capacity to cause the
`video players to record programming from any source.
`
`4
`It has no capacity to receive programming transmis-
`sions or process received transmissions in any way. It
`has no capacity to operate under the control of instruc-
`tions transmitted by broadcasters. It has no capacity to
`insert signals that convey information to or control, in
`any way, the automatic operation of ultimate receiver
`station apparatus other than television receivers.
`As regards the automation of ultimate receiver sta-
`tions, in the prior art, U.S. Pat. No. 4,337,480 to Bouras-
`sin et al. describes a dynamic interconnection system for
`connecting at least one television receiver to a plurality
`of television peripheral units. By means of a single re-
`mote keyboard, a viewer can automatically connect and
`disconnect any of the peripheral units without the need
`manually to switch systems or fasten and unfasten ca-
`bling each time. In addition, using a so-called “image-
`within-image” capacity, the viewer can superimpose a
`secondary image from a second peripheral unit upon the
`primary image on the television display. In this fashion,
`_two peripheral units can be viewed simultaneously on
`one television receiver. U.S. Pat. No. 4,264,925 to
`Freeman et al. describes a multi-channel programming
`transmission system wherein subscribers may select
`manually among related programming alternatives
`transmitted simultaneously on separate channels.
`This prior art, too, is limited. It has no capacity for
`interconnecting or operating a system at any time other
`than the time when the order to do so is entered manu-
`ally at the system or remote keyboard. It has no capac-
`ity for acting on instructions transmitted by broadcast-
`ers to interconnect, actuate or tune systems peripheral
`to a television receiver or to actuate a television re-
`ceiver or automatically change charmels received by a
`receiver. It has no capacity for coordinating the pro-
`gramming content transmitted by any given peripheral
`system with any other programming transmitted to a
`television receiver. It has no capacity for controlling
`two separate systems such as, for example, an automatic
`radio and television stereo simulcast. It has no capacity
`for selectively connecting radio receivers to radio pe-
`ripherals such as computers or printers or speakers or
`for connecting computers to computer peripherals (ex-
`cept perhaps a television set). It has no capacity for
`controlling the operation of decryptors or selectively
`inputting transmissions to decryptors or outputting
`transmissions from decryptors to other apparatus. It has
`no capacity for monitoring and maintaining records
`regarding what programming is selected or played on
`any apparatus or what apparatus is connected or how
`connected apparatus operate.
`The prior art includes a variety of systems for moni-
`toring programming and generating so-called “ratings.”
`One system that monitors by means of embedded digital
`signals is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,025,851 to Hasel-
`wood, et al. Another that monitors by means of audio
`codes that are only “substantially inaudible” is de-
`scribed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,845,391 to Crosby. A third
`that automatically monitors a plurality of channels by
`switching sequentially among them and that includes
`capacity to monitor audio and visual quality is de-
`scribed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,547,804 to Greenberg.
`This prior art, too, is limited. It has capacity to moni-
`tor only single broadcast stations, channels or, units and
`lacks capacity to monitor more than one channel at a
`time or to monitor the combining of media. At any
`given monitor station, it has had capacity to monitor
`either what is transmitted over one or more channels or
`what is received on one or more receivers but not both.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`
`Apple v. PM
`|PR2016-0075
`
`Page 2
`
`PMC Exhibit 2051
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00755
`Page 25
`
`
`
`4,965,825
`
`5
`It has assumed monitored signals of particular format in
`particular transmission locations and has lacked capac-
`ity to vary formats or locations or to distinguish and act
`on the absence of signals or to interpret and process in
`any fashion signals that appear in monitored locations
`that are not monitored signals. It has lacked capacity to
`identify encrypted signals then decrypt them. It has
`lacked capacity to record and also transfer information
`to a remote geographic location simultaneously.
`As regards recorder/player systems, many means and
`methods exist in the prior art for recording television or
`audio programming and/or data on magnetic, optical or
`other recording media and for retransmitting prere-
`corded programming. Video tape recorders have ca-
`pacity for automatic delayed recording of television
`transmissions on the basis of instructions input manually
`by viewers. So-called “interactive video” systems have
`capacity for locating prerecorded television program-
`ming on a given disc and transmitting it to television
`receivers and locating prerecorded digital data on the
`same disc and transmitting them to computers.
`This prior art, too, is limited. It has no capacity for
`automatically embedding signals in and/or removing
`embedded signals from a television transmission then
`recording the transmission. It has no capacity for con-
`_ trolling the connection or actuation or tuning of exter-
`nal apparatus. It has no capacity for retransmitting pre-
`recorded programming and controlling the decryption
`of said programming, let alone doing so on the basis of
`signals that are embedded in said programming that
`contain keys for the decryption of said programming. It
`has no capacity for operating on the basis of control
`signals transmitted to recorder/players at a plurality of
`subscriber stations, let alone operating on the basis of
`such signals to record user specific information at each
`subscriber station.
`As regards decoders and decryptors, many different
`systems exist, at present, that enable programming sup-
`pliers to restrict the use of transmitted programming to
`only duly authorized subscribers. The prior art includes
`so-called “addressable” systems that have capacity for
`controlling specific individual subscriber station appa-
`ratus by means of control instructions transmitted in
`broadcasts. Such systems enable broadcasters to turn off
`subscriber station decoder/decryptor apparatus of sub-
`scribers who do not pay their bills and turn them back
`on when the bills are paid.
`This prior art, too, is limited. It has no capacity for
`decrypting combined media programming. It has no
`capacity for identifying then selectively decrypting
`control
`instructions embedded in unencrypted pro-
`gramming transmissions. It has no capacity for identify-
`ing programming transmissions or control instructions
`selectively and transferring them to a decryptor for
`decryption. It has no capacity for transferring the out-
`put of a decryptor selectively to one of a plu