`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________________
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
`Patent Owner
`___________________________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00755
`U.S. Patent No. 8,191,091
`___________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and Paper 39, Patent Owner Personalized
`
`IPR2016-00755
`Patent No. 8,191,091
`
`
`
`Media Communications, LLC (“PMC”) hereby submits the following objections to
`
`Petitioner’s demonstrative exhibits. Petitioner and PMC met and conferred on
`
`June 1-2, 2017 but were unable to reach a resolution regarding the following
`
`objections.
`
`PMC objects to Petitioner’s Slides 5, 8, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 25, 27, 28, 33, 41,
`
`43, 46, and 53 for their extensive citations to, and block-quotes of, entire
`
`paragraphs from the Board’s Institution Decision (Paper No. 14) as if they were
`
`supporting evidence. The Institution Decision, reflecting the Board’s preliminary
`
`findings, is neither “evidence in the record” nor Petitioner’s own arguments as
`
`presented in its papers. See Paper 39 at 3 (“demonstrative exhibits should cite to
`
`evidence in the record.”); CBS Interactive Inc. v. Wireless Scis. LLC, Case
`
`IPR2013-00033 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013) (Paper 118) at 3 (“Whatever a party desires
`
`to present, for whatever reason, should have already been presented in the party’s
`
`[filings], or other exhibits”). PMC therefore requests that the block-quotes of
`
`Paper No. 14 be stricken from those slides.
`
`PMC objects to Petitioner’s Slides 58-61 in their entireties because they are
`
`directed solely to issues related to PMC’s Contingent Motion to Amend (Paper 21)
`
`on which PMC will not present anything during the oral hearing. See Paper 39 at
`
`2-3 (“On rebuttal, each party will be restricted to only those matters raised by the
`
`1
`
`
`
`other party in its initial presentation.”). PMC therefore requests that Slides 58-61
`
`IPR2016-00755
`Patent No. 8,191,091
`
`
`be deleted in their entireties from Petitioner’s demonstrative exhibits.
`
`
`Dated: June 2, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By
`/ Douglas J. Kline /
`Douglas J. Kline
`Registration No.: 35,574
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`100 Northern Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`(617) 570-1209
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner Personalized
`Media Communications, LLC
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the:
`
`IPR2016-00755
`Patent No. 8,191,091
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`filed herewith was served, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.6(e)(1) and the consent found
`in Section III.D of the Petition (Paper No. 1), by electronic mail on counsel for
`Petitioner at the electronic mail addresses set forth below:
`
`
`Marcus E. Sernel, Joel R. Merkin, and Eugene Goryunov
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`300 North LaSalle Street
`Chicago, Illinois 60654
`P: (312) 862-2000; F: (312) 862-2200
`marc.sernel@kirkland.com
`joel.merkin@kirkland.com
`eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com
`Apple-PMC-PTAB@kirkland.com
`
`Gregory S. Arovas
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, New York 10022
`P: (212) 446-4800; F: (212) 446-4900
`greg.arovas@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 2, 2017
`
`By:
`
`
`
`/ Douglas J. Kline /
`
`
`
`
`
`