throbber
PMC Exhibit 2066
`PMC Exhibit 2066
`Apple v. PMC
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016—OO753
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 1
`Page 1
`
`

`
`Electronics, Television, Radio,‘ Audio
`FEBRUARY1977
`voles No1494
`
`Contents
`
`3.1 Attitudes to mobile radio
`32.-«Viewdata by S. Fedida
`37
`transient intermodulation in amplifiers by Bert Sundqvist
`39 H.F. predictions
`\\
`40 News of the month
`Unique optical link
`Television “sound” for the deaf
`Band II ferrite rod aerials
`Circuit ideas
`“Telecomms industry needs reorganization”
`Nickel cadmium cells by K. C. Johnson
`Announcements
`Logic design — 2 by B. Hoidsworth and L. Zissos
`Letters to the editor
`‘
`WARC 1979 and official secrecy
`Aural sensitivity to phase
`Advanced pre-amplifier design
`57 Electronic systems by W. E. Anderton
`59 Further notes on the Wireless World teletext decoder by J. F.
`Daniels
`<
`61 Literature received
`62 Weather satellite picture facsimile machine — 3 by G. R. .
`Kennedy
`’
`V
`66 Transistor arrays — Circards 32 by J. Carruthers, J. H. Evans,
`’" T. Kinsler and P. Williams
`62> Mystery Soviet over-the-horizon tests
`69 Digital angle modulation -—— 2 by R. Thompson and D. R.
`Clouting
`75 Electronica 76
`'
`76 Sixty years ago
`77 Characteristics and load lines -—— 4 by S. W. Amos
`80 World of amateur radio
`81 New products '
`123 APPOINTMENTS VACANT
`136 INDEX TO ADVERTISERS
`
`Current issue price 351:, back_ issues (if available) 50 . at Retail and Trade’ Counter, Paris Garden.
`London SE1. By past. current issue 551). back issues (i available) 50p,_order and payment to Room 11,
`Dorset House, London SE.i_ BLU.
`_'Editoria| ix A(l\'Crli$i|i\_: offices: Dorset Houzac. Sizxinford Siruci. London SE1 9'i:U,
`_
`Telephones: Editorial 0| 261 8620: Advertising Ol~26l 8339.
`.
`TclegralnsTelcx. Wiwnrld Bisnespres 25l37.London. Cables. “Eihaworlcl. London SE1."
`Subscription rates: 1 year: £7.00 UK and overseas ($18.20 USA and Lianada). Student rate: l year. £3.50
`UK and overseas ($9.10 USA and Canada).
`‘
`*
`_
`Distribution: 40 Bowling Green Lane. London ECIR ONE. Telephone 01-837 3636.
`' Subscriptions: Oakficld House. Perrymounl Rd. Haywards Heaili. “Sussex RHl6 3DH. Telephone
`V 0444 59188. Subscribers are requested to notify a change of address
`C3
`l.P.C. Business Press Ltd. 1977-
`
`' Vsewdata
`blitkei csdmi
`
`a
`t
`Front cover shows 2: gm '
`by
`silica optical
`fibres mad
`Standard Telecommunication
`Laboratories for use in*op_tical
`communication systems.
`Photographer Paul Brierley
`
`IN OUR NEXT ISSUE ..
`
`.
`
`rhythm
`Electronic
`Con-
`accompaniment.
`structional design for.
`a
`"rhythm section" which
`controls the musical timing
`of sources giving percus-
`sion sounds and can be
`used with an electronic
`organ.
`
`Interference from ama-
`teur stations with tele-
`vision‘,
`sound and audio
`equipment — how bad is it?
`Results of a RSGB survey
`that attempts to assess the_
`situation fairly.
`
`7 Television test generator.
`Construction of a laboratory
`instrument giving cross‘-
`hatch, dot matrix,
`colour
`bar and ‘grey scale patterns’.
`Simple design based on ‘
`t.t.l. integrated circuits.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2066
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 2
`
`

`
`‘is:
`
`i
`
`Wireless World. February 1977
`
`i/IEWDATA
`The Post O-ff,ic,e,’s__t_extual
`information and communications
`system:
`1 _— background. and introduction
`
`. py s. Fedida, l§.Sc.(Eng.),‘M.Sc., F.|.E.E., A.Cl.G.l. Post office Research centre
`
`Viewdata is a system for disseminat-
`ing, and retrieving computer based
`information, using the domestic
`telephone line for communication and
`the domestic television set for dis-
`play. It differs from teletext which is a
`specific system of broadcasting tex-
`tual
`information interleaved with
`pictorial information: the two systems
`are complementary rather than com-
`petitive. This article looks at earlier
`systems of accessing computer data
`banks
`from remote points using
`telephone lines and then introduces
`the Viewdata system now on pilot
`trial in the UK.
`‘
`'
`
`Essentially the concept of accessinga
`computer data bank from a remote
`point using telephone lines is not new.
`The technique was demonstrated in the
`mid-60s by Dr Sutherland of
`the
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
`and has been used increasingly ever
`since, but mainly by the professional
`computer user.
`Indeed. networks of
`computers ' have been "installed in
`various parts of the world for
`this
`purpose
`and for
`the purpose of
`‘computation. In the~US an ambitious
`computer network ARPANET has been
`in operation for some years and has
`been extended to provide world wide‘
`coverage.
`In Europe a new system
`EURONET" is
`in process of being
`implemented to provide a computer
`network for scientific and technical
`information in the European Commun-
`ity.
`,
`,Many private computer networks
`have also been installed world wide to
`provide business and scientific_com-
`puter facilities on in—house bases.
`Viewdata on the other hand belongs to
`a family of(:ompuLer—based information
`systems which are intended for the
`general public, i.e. users who have no
`computer training whatever and indeed
`who do not intend to undergo such
`training.
`. Systems of these kinds have to be
`specifically tailored to this class of users
`who may well have, and indeed_will
`have, considerable expertise and intel-
`
`index. displayed on a com-
`Viewdatci
`mercial teletext/Viewdata receiver.
`
`lectual ability but not necessarily in the
`intricacies and minutiae of computer
`programming.
`In general
`they are
`anxious to use the capabilities of
`computers both for the purpose of
`informationvretrieval and other pur-
`poses, but have neither time nor indeed
`the inclination to‘ submit to the usually
`tiresome computer protocol. (The pro-
`tocol is the set of rules and instructions
`which govern access to computersand
`the use of their programmes.)
`Several attempts have been made in
`the recent past to bring computcr—based
`information to the people.
`
`The Reston experiment. A well docu-
`mented attempt
`is
`the Reston
`experiment2 in Virginia USA, using the
`Mitre Corporation interactive television
`system TICCIT which stands for
`“time—sharecl,‘ interactive, computer-
`controlled information television” uti-
`
`'lising a standard television receiver as a
`display.
`Essentially the system requires that
`the user be connected to a cable
`television network, over which are
`transmitted a number of still tv frames,
`60 different frames per second. Thus
`assuming an information cycle time of
`10 seconds,
`i.e. each user accesses, a
`different frame every 10 seconds, the
`system can support 600 users simultan-
`eously on a dedicated tv channel, each
`user
`receiving his own selection of
`information.
`Associated with the user television
`receiver is a video tape recorder, which
`takes a recording of the frame intended
`for the user and plays it back to the tv at
`thexrate of 60 times a second.
`The individual selection of informa-
`tion frames is carried out using a
`telephone connection from the user to
`the computer centre, together with the’
`'push_—button set on the telephone with -
`which the user may key the number of
`the frame required. When this is done
`the computer
`transmits this frame
`followed by a user address, which is
`
`PMC Exhibit 2066
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 3
`
`

`
`Wireless World, February 1977
`coded on line 480 or 481 (for even and
`odd frames) of the tv scan. A couplerl
`decoder at the user end examines this
`address and connects the video recorder
`to cable for the duration of the follow-
`ing frame,
`thus capturing the frame
`selected.
`The home equipment needed in this
`system is not only a tv set but also a
`video tape recorder and a special
`adapter, while the communications
`medium consists of a wideband cable
`and a telephone connection.
`
`In-Touch. This computer information
`service’ was launched in Seattle,
`Washington in 1973 with the backing of
`the Seattle First National Bank for the
`purpose of providing a number of
`financial and budgeting servicerto/the
`home user and the small business. It
`uses the push-button telephone, to send
`‘instructions to the computer, which
`then provides a voice response. Thus
`the terminal equipment is minimal. The
`main problem of course is to so organise
`the service that the obvious limitations
`of
`the terminal equipment both in
`transmitting and receiving information
`are effectively overcome. The other
`problem noted by the originators of the
`scheme, and somewhat related to the
`above but clearly much more complex,
`is to so arrange the dialogue between _
`computer and userthat the latter needs
`no special computer training whatever.
`It
`is believed that this system closed
`down after an intial one-year experi-
`mental period.
`
`DIALS (calculation by telephone). This i
`system“ was developed by NTT (Nippon
`Telegraph and Telephone Co.),
`the
`public telephone administration in
`Japan, to provide a calculation service
`to telephone subscribers, on an on-line,
`real-time basis. The public service was
`initiated in 1970/71. In this case also the_
`push-button telephone is used as a
`transmit and receive terminal, outgoing
`instructions being keyed on the push-
`button keypad and transmitted to‘ the
`computer as a sequence of audio tones.
`The computer response is a voice signal
`which gives the result of the computa-
`tion.
`-
`The calculation facilities offered by
`DIALS are fairly complex. They include
`the simple arithmetic operations +,
`—, X,
`-2,
`and also basic facilities
`such
`as
`trigonometric
`functions,
`logarithms and so forth.
`It
`is ‘also
`possible to input an algebraic expres-
`sion with dummy arguments which is
`memorised by the computer. This is
`then followed by sets of arguments
`supplied by the’ user on which the
`computer operates. Finally it is possible
`to call some library programmes, for
`example for statistical work, compound
`interest and the like.
`.
`Clearly the standard 12-button tele-
`phone keyboards cannot be used with-
`out substantial modifications to trans-
`mit the required instructions. This is
`
`33.
`
`to support Picturcphone, it is clearly,‘
`possible to enhance the video facility by_'
`providing the option of displaying
`computer-based information as an
`alternative to the normal‘ pictorial
`information. To do this a display data.
`set (equivalent
`to a modem‘ in UK‘
`* terminology) was developed to provide j
`computer access to Picturephone users.
`Essentially this data set, which is sited
`‘ at the exchange, acts as an interface
`between the computer and the Picture-2’:
`phvonesstation at the user’s premises.
`Instructions to the computer are sent
`by the customer to the exchange using
`the push-button telephone (m.f. sig-
`nalling) as in the previous systems. This
`is converted by the display data set to
`ASCII* characters and transmitted to
`the computer along a narrow-band data '
`line. which could be a standard voice
`circuit. The computer response, which
`is a string of ASCII characters,
`is.
`received by the display data set ‘andf
`stored therein.
`It
`is converted in the,"
`data set to a video signal which is the
`transmitted to the Picturephone statioh
`‘ as if it were a standard Picturephonei‘,
`signal. Since there is no storage at the"
`subscriber's end this information needs
`to be sent repeatedly, television fashion;
`to keep the display ‘refreshed, at 30f
`times per second.
`Clearly this technical solution to the-
`retrieval and display of computer based.‘
`information is satisfactory in an envir-f
`onrnent where the Picturephone is"
`already established as a viable "com-_
`munication service, and its develop-"
`ment might then have followed the lines
`of Viewdata in terms of protocol, extra
`facilities etc., had it been persevered
`with.
`
`Viewed however, as a means of:
`providing simply a new information and
`communications service to the general
`public,
`its association with Picture-
`phone delayed and indeed hindered its
`proper development and timely intro-
`duction, since it depended on the‘
`establishment of awideband Picture-
`phone capability across the countryflto
`\ achieve the penetration needed to make V
`the service economically viable and
`truly available to the general public.
`,
`
`_:_
`
`-
`
`‘
`Development of-Viewdata
`The Viewdata concept began in the Post
`Office Research Department in 1970/71;,‘ _
`more or
`less concurrently with the
`systems mentioned earlier. As with’
`these systems there was the notion that
`there was an important potential foij
`applying computer-based information
`systems to the public service area, buff
`that, while technologically there were
`no insuperable hurdles to overcome, ’
`nevertheless there were fundamental’;
`problems that had to be resolved before
`practical and economicallyvviable sys-J
`tems could be designed and engineered,
`to be usable by the general public. -
`'i
`
`" American Standard Code for Information
`lnterc hange.
`
`. H
`(Red)
`
`‘
`
`(Blue)
`
`1. Overlay template attached to
`Fig.
`push-button telephone used in DIALS
`calculation service
`V
`
`'
`
`overcome by superimposing a remova-
`ble template on to the dial and using
`groups of numbers and symbols for
`each of the required calculation sym-
`bols. A diagram of the overlay is shown
`in Fig. 1. For example, an expression
`such as
`“4 ><(3 +5)—G.2"
`is transmitted as
`4*7*l$*05*2*86*52**:
`The end group of symbols **: signifies
`the “go" instruction (instructing the
`computer to go ahead withthe compu-
`tation).
`A
`*
`Trigonometric and logarithmic func-
`tions are transmitted as a number
`preceded by F and followed by the
`argument in brackets, e.g.
`log,D(X) is
`transmitted as F2(X), while library
`programmes are given .a number pre-
`ceded by L, eg. the integrating function
`is L36.
`‘
`7
`.
`The use of the template has been
`explained at some length to indicate the
`complexity introduced in a system of
`this kind, if one is limited to using just
`the 12 buttons of the telephone push-
`button set. This complication is avoided
`in Viewdata in a number of ways to be
`described later.
`,
`4’
`The use of a voice response system for
`imparting the kind of
`information
`mentioned above is obviously fraught
`with pitfalls, and the complexity of the
`coding needed to pass instructions nos
`doubt added to the difficulties.
`
`Bell Picturephone computer access
`system. As part of the development of
`Pi(:turephone in the USA, means Were.
`devéloped to display computer generat-
`ed information on the Picturephone
`station set.5. Picturephone is a Bell
`Telephone development which provides
`face to face communication between
`telephone subscribers — a two way
`video telephone. Special
`lines (Video
`access lines) must be installed to
`transmit Picturephone information to
`the subscribers. These consist of two
`pairs of
`lines equalized to transmit
`satisfactorily, at
`least
`in the initial
`stages, a bit
`rate of 6.312 Mbit per
`second.
`In addition the normal
`tele-
`' phone connection is also required. A
`typical local arrangement is shown in
`Fig. 2.
`Given an environment which has
`already been designed and established
`
`PMC Exhibit 2066
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 4
`
`

`
`cusToMER's
`PREMISES
`
`LOCAL CENTRAL ~
`OFFICE
`
`Telephone
`switch
`
`Wireless World, February 1977
`
`2-wire
`telephone
`trunks
`
`Picturephone
`trunks
`
`_
`_
`Fig. 2. (above). Baszc local
`arrangement used in the
`Picturephone system "
`developed by Bell
`Telephone; (right)
`Picturephone computer
`access system
`
`4
`
`Voice-band
`data link
`
`‘Standard
`Picturephone
`loop
`
`Computer
`
`-if Required i1’Lh'e
`display data set
`is remote from
`the computer
`
`Picture-phone
`switch
`
`L.___.__
`
`‘
`
`In ‘common with all these systems,
`Viewdata set out to solve these protr
`lems. As was to be expected, each
`solution turned out to be somewhat
`different, partly to adapt to a different
`environment, butalso because of dif-
`ferent design philosophies. These pr0l')~
`lems are in the following areas:
`'
`'
`Q the terminal
`(the transmission system
`0 the computer relationship
`9 the system potential
`
`The terminal. The terminal used to
`communicate with the computer clearly
`‘has’ to he a ‘low~priced, attractively
`styled and reliable piece of electronics.
`to ensure a wide market penetration
`with the general public.
`'
`,
`The push-button telephonelis clearly
`I such axterminal. Indeed in the standar-
`disation of m.f. telephone systems, this
`' possibility has been kept firmly in view,
`and has resulted in ‘proposals for
`_enhanced push-button sets containing
`_16 keys.
`
`While the push-button telephone is a
`suitable transmission terminal,
`for
`ignyiusers it has obvious limitations
`for the more advanced applications,
`Indeed attempts at squeezing a large
`alphabet from the, limited number of
`keys only leads, to confusion and‘
`irritation on the part of the user. As a
`receiving terminal it requires that the
`'-computer response be a voice response.“
`Here also this could well be acceptable
`some time, but
`it suffers from very
`serious limitations. Where the amount
`of information is fairly limited, e.g. one
`or
`two items of
`information, voice
`response is probably acceptable to’
`many users. Even then,
`the fleeting
`nature of the voice response hinders
`comprehension very seriously and
`messages need to be repeated several
`times to allow full understanding, the
`taking of notes etc.
`.
`Two of the systems described above
`used the pushbutton telephone, but the
`extent and versatility of the service
`planned for Viewdata made the push-
`
`button telephone associated with >VOiC£
`response quite unsuitable for a good
`general purpose information system
`capable of growing to meet the needs of
`the users.
`The alternative to a voice response
`system is the visual display. This is
`easier to implement and vastly cheaper
`as far as the computer is concerned and
`to the user it offers unparalleled scope
`in comprehension and in the range of
`information that can be put over. It can
`lend itself to multilingual and graphical
`information" fairly readily. One of the
`important aspects of Viewdata is the
`possibility of implementing a wide
`range of information services across
`multi—national boundaries.
`Visual displays have been in wides-
`pread use in the computer field for some
`years, but their cost is still we1l‘above
`that considered acceptable to the mass
`market. It is therefore not surprising
`that many information systems have
`sought to capitalise on the domestic
`television display’, which, with suitable
`
`PMC Exhibit 2066
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 5
`
`

`
`Wireless World, February 1977
`
`modifications, may be adapted to
`become the ideal information terminal
`for home use. It also has considerable
`attractions in the form of a dedicated
`communication station for office use —
`what we have called the Viewdata-
`phone (see below).
`Ideally an unmodified tv set, with an
`adapter box capable of transforming it
`into a computer terminal,
`is the best
`approach, and while this is technically
`quite feasible for Viewdata, where
`transmission data rates are low, and
`colour is not an essential facility, it is
`,much less suitable for teletext. In the
`last—mentioned case and where a colour
`display is required in Viewdata (and
`there is no doubt that the addition of
`colour gives considerable visual _
`appeal), a built-in adapter is preferable.
`It is hoped that tv sets with integral
`adapters, and external adapters for
`existing tv sets, will be available on the
`market quite soon.
`
`The transmission system. Initially the
`major impetus to the development of
`information systems for the home was
`provided by the availability of spare
`bandwidth in cable tv systems. Clearly
`this makes sense, since the spare
`bandwidth is available at marginal cost,
`the main use being to convey television
`programmes. Hence in countries where
`cable tv networks are fairly extensive,
`such as the USA and Canada,
`the
`emphasis has been on using this
`medium for the transmission of infor-
`mation.
`The Reston [experiment mentioned
`above is an example of such a system
`and clearly provides a great deal of
`information, e.g. pictures, which Cannot
`be easily accommodated with narrow
`band systems such as those depending
`on telephone lines. This system, how-
`ever, requires the use of the telephone
`
`Fig. 3. (below). Displayed index from
`which the user selects the topic he
`requires. Fig. 4 (right). Index to maga-
`zine 3 as listed on the Fig. 3 display,
`showing the progressive nature of the
`Viewdata index.
`
`network as well, to provide the selection
`means and thus lose‘ the advantage of
`marginal costing of unused bandwidth
`of the tv cable installation.
`Alternative systems based on the
`“frame grabbing” principle and trans-
`mitting the whole data base contin-
`uously over a tv broadcast channel on '
`cable or off air are also possibleand
`indeed (‘.m1ld become very attractive. In
`these systems the page selection is
`carried out at the receiving point and
`hence they do not require a return
`communications channel.. Properly
`designed they are capable of transmit-
`ting a great deal more information than
`the Reston system, provided pictorial
`information is not required. A single tv
`channel, for example, could provide the
`equivalent
`of
`30,000
`pages
`of
`alphanumeric information“.
`The absence of a return channel to
`the information Source obviously
`implies that the system is not interac-
`tive, i.e. the user cannot respond to the
`information provided, or generate
`information himself. Thus the system is
`completely passive and cannot provide
`services requiring user interaction.
`Where spare tv channels are not
`available, either off-air or in a cable tv
`environment, or when interactive oper-
`ation is required to support a broad
`range of additional services as provided
`by Viewdata, then the telephone trans-
`mission medium is the best available.
`This is why Viewdata has been
`implemented as an “intelligent" com-
`munications mcdium using the tele-
`phone system. In order to impose the
`minimum of constraints on the rapid
`build up of
`the service and ensure
`rugged and reliable operation, only the
`current well—proven transmission per-
`formance of the telephone network is
`postulated; as indeed is the exi_sting
`telephone switching environment. Thus
`the current experimental Viewdata
`system on pilot trial uses 1200 bits per
`second for computer to terminal and 75
`bits in the reverse direction. As deve-
`lopments and enhancements take place
`in this area,
`they will be gradually
`introduced in Viewdata with the aim of
`improving performance and reducing
`costs.
`
`35
`
`The computer relationship. In Viewdata
`as in the other systems noted earlier, the
`problem of how to enable users with no
`special computer training to access and
`instruct a computer loomed large,
`mainly because computer programming
`had developed from the very beginning, '
`and with very few exceptions, into an
`increasingly complex set of routines.
`These demanded a great deal of con-
`centration, attention to detail and
`constant and continuous practice to be
`mastered effectively.
`In a sense the computer programmer’
`is a designer of a logic system, who uses ‘
`logical
`instructions instead of using
`logical circuit interconnections like his’
`colleague who designshardware logic
`systems. But whereas we do not expect
`the user of a piece of logic hardware to
`be able to design it, in the computer field
`there is not a great deal of distinction
`between the design programmer and
`the user programmer. This is in part due
`to the extraordinary flexibility of the
`computer. Dedicated and trained users
`are able to modify a programme or if
`necessary write new ones to suit their
`specific applications.
`To quote from the originators of
`In-Touch, “There is the problem of how
`to communicate with someone who
`only had a high school education or
`less”. “How do you get them to operate
`a computer error free?” “Having done
`that you must program the computer to
`respond satisfactorily to the communi-
`cation by that customer. You also have
`to configure the hardware (and the
`software) consistent with customers
`who are not sophisticated and therefore
`do not expect anything to break.”
`These comments are particularly"
`relevant to the situation prevailing in
`Viewdata and some of
`the above
`systems, where the range of services
`extend far beyond the provision of a
`simple set of
`information. But
`in
`.\/iewdata the designers of the system
`have taken a substantially. more
`enlightened view. They do not
`look
`down on the user as being “naive",
`“unsophisticated” or slightlybelow par
`as regards educational standards. It is
`rather a question of specialised training,
`which few people outside the ranks of
`
`Pas‘! QFFICE
`-n-—--no-—
`I.IlElllI]l'-lTFi
`UIEl-XDATA NASA;I NE 2
`..hono magaz 1 no two
`U1EUDQTQ HQGQZI NE 3
`infcmmztian of
`“€O|"I§iI$l"\if\
`‘interest: lhciuding E-Jr.-n. cal
`COMMERCIAL HEMS nnsnzrus 4
`-of parl*.;i.x:u1ar
`intorarsi. Lu the
`-bus inessman
`UIEfJL’IfiTfi SERVICES
`— ms 8. calculator-
`ME5 RG5 SERUICE
`-sonciin
`B. r-oceiuing messages
`GODDBYE U ELJCIATA
`KEY PUIGER REQUIRED
`
`A generaI
`:
`
`is-xssi fied s=z.:lz_: rti
`rsairsmenb and
`5 arms! Fina
`
`Keg ."iUl'nbv5-0'“
`
`r~eqci5.r~ed
`
`PMC Exhibit 2066
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 6
`
`

`
`36
`
`those who do computer programming
`as a full
`time occupation have the
`‘ opportunity or even the willingness to
`acquire.
`A clear distinction is drawn between
`computer programmers who design
`programmes and computer users who
`use them and are thus enabled to
`instruct the machine (computer) to do
`all that the designers intended them to
`do.
`the
`to get
`. The first objective is
`machine tothe people, and when this
`has achieved a high degree of penetra-
`tion, then is the time to refine it to
`attempt to meet the needs of those who
`may want to do more with the machine
`than most people.
`\
`
`The computer dialogue. How then is it
`possible to overcome the very consider-
`able problem of ensuring adequate
`communications between user and
`computer? The key is in the dialogue
`between the two.
`The computer must first of all “un-
`derstand” what
`the user wants. The
`usual method of communicating with’
`computers is to design a special pro-
`gramming language which the user has
`to learn and which the computer is
`programmed to “understand.” This
`works adequately in conventional com—_
`puter programming but is clearly far too
`complicated in this application. Another
`approach is to use a prompting system:
`the computer offers a number of choices
`from which the user selects the one
`most appropriate to his requirements.
`This clearly limits the user's freedom
`but nevertheless avoids many of the
`problems connected with formal com-
`puter languages.
`The simplest of these dialogues is an
`index from which the user selects the
`topic he requires (see Figure 3). This of
`course isthe technique used in teletext.
`But the index in Viewdata is progressive
`(see Fig. 4), unlike that
`in ‘ teletext,
`where since the total amount of infor-
`mation on offer
`is very limited,
`the
`whole index may be displayed on one
`frame only.
`In Viewdata the information is sub-
`divided in a tree structure. The top of
`
`Index— D396 3
`
`page
`
`320 . 321
`
`322
`
`323
`
`324
`
`Entertainment
`
`r—I—r'T—i’T
`
`3232
`
`3234
`
`Rage '
`‘
`
`3230
`3231
`'
`What's on
`
`3233
`
`FJT_|"T_|T
`
`32304
`32302
`’ 32303
`'
`
`page £2300
`.
`32301
`Week B/8/— 17/B
`
`323004
`323002
`323000
`323003
`page
`323001
`Friday
`
`information in Vie‘wdata is
`5.
`Fig,
`sub—divided in a tree structure. This
`gives an example of main topics (at the
`top) being sub-divided down to sub-
`topics (at the bottom).
`
`the tree is a list ‘of main topics, each of
`which is then subdivided into sub-topics
`all
`the way ‘ down to the piece of
`information required. (See Fig. 5.) Some
`of the branches in Viewdata may extend
`down to perhaps 8 to 10 levels, thus
`implying a choice from several hundred
`million pages.
`The reason for the difference is to do
`with the scope and depth of treatment
`of the information supplied. Whereas in
`teletext the content of a magazine of
`which only one is transmitted at present
`is 100 pages, in the proposed Viewdata
`system a small
`local system might
`contain as many as 50,000 to 100,000
`pages of
`information. Clearly it
`is
`therefore necessary to subdivide this
`into a number of sub-sections, accord-
`
`Fig. 6. Some
`information is
`presented in
`considerable detail,
`with page numbers
`being a
`correspondingly large
`.
`.
`number of digits
`
`Page zzzeaaa
`
`CL IPPEP. LJEEK
`
`Finals at’ the 4:ug—o¢’-mar
`tournament.
`Moat of the
`

`
`‘
`
`,
`,
`.~—l
`50” WRK,
`ET HORSE
`
`CRYSTAL PQLQEZE.
`TEST MATCH ~‘ OUFIL.
`RRCING - KEMPTDN PHRK.
`HOUERCRQFT 3. DING-HY
`JQQCING ON THRMES.
`
`K99 *B# to return
`
`Wireless World. Fehruarv 1977
`
`mg to an easily understood classifica-
`tion which enables the user to find the
`bit he wants quickly and simply.
`Some of the information is given in
`great detail and the corresponding page
`number could have 6, 7 or even 8 digits
`(see Fig. 6). It would clearly be imprac-
`ticable to offer such a complex‘ index in
`one lump. Hence the selection system
`chosen.
`At every selection step the user only
`needs to key a single digit to move to the
`next
`level down,
`thus considerably
`simplfying and speeding up the whole
`operation.
`.
`Other selection or retrieval systems
`are, of course, possible. For example, it
`would be possible to print
`the total
`computer index and have it available
`like a directory to all users. This entails
`the additional expense in printing and
`distribution, presents serious updating
`problems and may confuse many users.
`By incorporating the index in the
`system this is made self-contained an
`flexible.
`~
`'
`A fundamentally different approach
`to the step by step index is that used in
`many information retrieval systems.
`This is
`the use of “key-words.” An
`example of the use of keywords would
`be to key “football results". There are
`several problems associated with a
`selection by keywords. These are fairly
`easy to resolve in computer data bases
`intended for the professional, but not so
`easy for a public service.
`H
`First the keyword approach requires
`a “thesaurus,” a dictionary of terms
`used together with their synonyms
`which are meaningful to the computer,
`Secondly,
`the user would require a
`much more complex keyboard than the
`basic keyboard normally provided.
`Thirdly the use of keywords involves
`the computer in what could be a
`considerable search, and hence would
`cause the computer costs to escalate
`probably, beyond the means of the
`general public.
`these reasons that the
`It is for all
`index selection was chosen. With this
`arrangement the whole system is kept‘
`basically simple and easy to understand.
`(To be continued)
`
`References
`l. The Euronet Project, by G. W. P. Davies,
`Proceedings of the European Computing
`Conference, London, September 1975.
`2. The Reston, Virginia, Test of the Mitre
`Corporation, interactive Television System.
`The Mitre Corporation, Washington, Report
`MTP352, May 197].
`2. in Touch Services, Computing. November
`1973, report by Pamela Evans.
`4. DIALS (Calculation by Telephone),
`Yoshijuki Mima and Toshiaki Shibagama,
`Japan Telecommunications Review 1970.
`5, P. 5. Warwick and G. W. Phipps, The
`Picturephone System, Computer Access,
`BSTJ, Vol. 50, No 2, February 1971.
`f
`6. S. Fedida, Viewdata — An Interactive
`Information Medium for the General Public
`using the Telephone Networks. 6th Interna-
`tional Broadcasting Convention, 20-24 Sep-
`tember l976.
`—
`
`PMC Exhibit 2066
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket