`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEALS BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`Case No.: IPR2016-00754
`Patent No.: 8,559,635
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude: IPR2016-00754
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby
`
`requests oral argument. The oral argument is presently scheduled for June 6, 2017.
`
`Paper 10. The issues to be argued include the following:
`
`1.
`
`Unpatentability based upon the instituted grounds:
`
`(i)
`
`Claims 7, 21, and 29 as anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102 by
`
`Guillou;
`
`(ii) Claims 4, 13, 28, and 30 as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`Guillou;
`
`(iii) Claims 21 and 28-30 as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`Aminetzah;
`
`(iv) Claim 4 as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Aminetzah and
`
`Bitzer.
`
`Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion to Amend;
`
`Procedural and evidentiary issues raised, e.g., in Motions to Exclude;
`
`Any additional issues on which the Board seeks information or
`
`clarification.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Apple requests it be permitted to argue first. Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 45,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012) (“[A] petitioner to a hearing
`
`will go first followed by the patent owner or respondent after which a rebuttal may
`
`be given by the petitioner.”).
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude: IPR2016-00754
`
`Apple requests that each party be allowed a total of thirty (30) minutes for
`
`its argument in this proceeding, with the opportunity to reserve a portion of that
`
`time for rebuttal. Apple also requests that the argument in this proceeding be held
`
`consecutively with the argument in IPR2016-00755, scheduled for the same day, as
`
`the two proceedings involve the same parties and related patents.
`
`Apple further requests the use of audio-visual equipment to assist its
`
`arguments and to display its demonstrative exhibits, including a computer-
`
`connectable projector, an ELMO, and a screen. Apple requests the services of a
`
`court reporter to transcribe the proceeding.
`
`
`
`Date: May 4, 2017
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Marcus E. Sernel
`
`Marcus E. Sernel (Reg. No. 55,606)
`Joel R. Merkin (Reg. No. 58,600)
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`300 North LaSalle Street
`Chicago, Illinois 60654
`P: 312.862.2000; F: 312.862.2200
`marc.sernel@kirkland.com
`joel.merkin@kirkland.com
`
`Attorneys For Petitioner
`
`2
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude: IPR2016-00754
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s
`
`Request for Oral Hearing was served on May 4, 2017 to the following attorneys of
`
`record by electronic transmission:
`
`Jennifer Albert
`Stephen Schneiner
`Krupa K. Parikh
`April E. Weisbruch
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`901 New York Avenue N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`jalbert@goodwinprocter.com
`sschreiner@goodwinprocter.com
`kparikh@goodwinlaw.com
`aweisbruch@goodwinlaw.com
`DG-PMC-Apple@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Thomas J. Scott
`PERSONALIZED MEDIA
`COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
`14090 Southwest Freeway, Suite 450
`Sugar Land, TX 77478
`tscott@pmcip.com
`
`Date: May 4, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Douglas Kline
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`Exchange Place, 53 State Street
`Boston, Massachusetts 02109
`dkline@goodwinlaw.com
`DG-PMC-Apple@goodwinprocter.com
`
` /s/ Marcus E. Sernel
`
` Marcus E. Sernel
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`