`
`—.
`
`©]
`
`_ OFFICIAL
`TECHNICAL RECORD ~
`1982
`
`
`
`Le cable:
`
`oisadaeine
`
`clé du futur
`
`
`Silver Anniversary Convention,
`25e Congrés annuel,
`Trade Show and
`Exposition commerciale
`CABLETHEQUE
`et CABLETHEGU
`May 31 — June 3, 1962
`Du 31 mal awd juin, 1982
`
`
`
`Sheraton Contre,
`Sheraton Centre,
`
`Toronto, Ontario,
`Toronto, Ontario
`
`Canadian Cable
`Association censdienne
`
`Television Association
`de télévision par cable
`
`
`
`neaa
`woe
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE
`DE TELEVISION
`PARGABLE
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`Apple v. PMC
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 1
`Page 1
`
`|
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`4| OFFICIAL TECHNICAL RECORD 1982
`INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS
`
`
`
`
`
`DOSSIER TECHNIQUE OFFICIEL 1982 DE L’ACTC
`COMMENTAIRES D’INTRODUCTION
`
`Isn't it a wonderful sight to see sunlight streaming
`through a window. The infusion of warmth and light is
`akin to the feeling that exists today in the Canadian cable
`television industry. The Canadian Radio-television and
`Telecommunications Commission and the Department of
`Communications have moved the industry ahead appreci-
`ably in the last year. The licensing of Pay TV distributors
`and the steps taken towards deregulation are appreciated
`byall Canadians.
`This year’s Official Technical Record reflects this
`feeling of optimism in the industry. Twenty-six outstan-
`ding papers will cover the full spectrum of our technical
`concerns. Substantial input has been provided by the Cable
`Telecommunications Research Institute (CTRD), the manu-
`facturing and supply industry, cable companies and by
`government. It
`is also encouraging to note that we have
`papers
`being presented by United States
`company
`representatives, also by Telesat and, a landmark first time,
`by a Canadian Broadcasting Corporation representative.
`We are indebted to the many members of the CCTA
`Technical Committee and Subcommittees who have done
`so much over the last year to assist CCTAin it’s continuing
`efforts
`to
`“open
`the
`curtains wider’.
`CCTA
`extends it’s appreciation to both the authors and to those
`people who have contributed freely of their time to assist
`in the bringing together of
`the Technical Program,
`particularly to those who are members of the CCTA Con-
`vention Program and Technical Digest Technical Subcom-
`mittee: N, Hamilton-Piercy, R. McIntyre, G. Brothers,
`RJ. Ménard and J. Halina.
`
`Nest-il pas merveilleux de voir enfin le soleil s'in-
`filtrer par la fenétre? Le mélange de chaleur et de lumiére
`qui s’en dégage est semblable au sentiment qui existe
`aujourd"hui au sein de Vindustrie canadienne de la
`télédistribution. Le Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des
`telécommunications canadiennes et le ministére des Com-
`munications ont grandement contribué a Pavancement de
`lindustrie au cours de Pannée écoulée. L’attribution de
`Hieences de télé payante et les mesures visant la dérégle-
`mentation sont appreéciées de tous les Canadiens.
`Cette année,
`le Dossier technique officiel arbore
`cette couleur d’eptimisme. Vingt-six exposés hors pair
`couvriront tous les aspects de nos préoccupations techni-
`ques. L" Institut de recherche en télécommunications par
`cable CRTC),
`les
`fabricants
`et
`fournisseurs,
`les
`télédistributeurs et le gouvernement y ont fourni un apport
`considerable. Fait encourageant: des exposés nous vien-
`nent de représentants de compagnies américaines, de
`Telésat et, grande premiére, d’un représentant de la Société
`Radio-Canada.
`
`Nous sommes reconnaissants aux nombreux mem-
`bres du Comité technique et des sous-comités de PACTC
`d@avoir tant appuyé l’Association dans la poursuite de ses
`efforts vers “‘une fenétre plus dégagée”’. L'ACTC remercie
`les auteurs et tous ceux qui ont offert de leur temps pourla
`realisation du programme technique, et tout particuliére-
`ment
`les membres du Comité d’éablissement du pro-
`gramme du congres et du Sous-comitée de rédaction des
`résumés techniques; N. Hamilton-Piercy, R. McIntyre, G.
`Brothers, R.J. Ménard et J. Halina.
`
` t
`
`
`
`
`
`
`George Cormack
`Vice-President Engineering /CCTA
`Le vice-président, Ingénierie, ACTC
`
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`Apple v. PMC
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 2
`Page 2
`
`

`

`THE NABU CONCEPT - DISTRIBUTED DATA PROCESSING VIA CABLE NETWORKS
`
`John Lee Hughes,
`NABU Manufacturing Corporation,
`Ottawa, Ontario
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`THE NABU CONCEPT
`
`Microcomputers are becoming cheaper and more
`capable.However, software creation and distribution costs
`are rising, and cable operators are looking for mew
`revenues, This paper describes NABU’s entrepreneurial
`concept which provides the CATV operator with several
`profitable opportunities and the customer with an
`obsolescence-resistant microcomputer. Some technical
`details of the equipment are described.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`NABL Manufacturing Corporation was formed
`with the intention of being Canada’s first major manufac-
`turer of microcomputers. NABU’s management felt thar
`the strongest irapediment to the sale of microcomputers on
`a large scale was the existing method of distributing soft-
`ware. Physical distribution of software through cassette or
`floppy disk was inappropriate to mass marketing because
`the buyer does not have adequate information to make a
`buying decision. The current methodology of buying “off
`the rack’’ software is analogous to a consumer buying a
`record without ever having heard it played!
`The solution was to build microcomputers with ade-
`quate communications capability to enable the distribution
`of software by electronic means. The benefits would be as
`follows:-
`
`1.
`Bd
`
`tas
`
`NABU was founded on the concept of marrying
`microcomputers with the cable industry. As a result,
`microcomputers will facilitate the delivery of many ex-
`citing new services to the home and business. The cable
`plant is the cornerstone of a broadband communications
`network including mot only cable, but microwave and
`satellites as well, lt is the first really viable alternative to
`the telephone company. By placing computers with large
`data bases at
`the head end software can be downline
`loaded, enabling subscribers in their homes and businesses
`to have access to enormous up-to-date program libraries
`for a monthly fee.
`
`ONE-WAY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
`
`The NABU concept covers various communications
`patterns and topologies, from one-way cable broadcasting,
`through two-way cable communications, and on to an in-
`tergrated system involving many local and regional CATV
`networks interconnected by gateways. This paper describes
`the one-way system as il appears to have the most im-
`mediate appeal and lowest introduction cost.
`The one-wayservice provided is Digital Broadcast
`Data which involves encoding data (e.¢. pages of informa-
`tion, software programs, etc.) into some form suitable for
`transmission on the CATV network. The head-end
`cyclically broadcasts the entire data base on the CATV net-
`work. The end user selects the information of interest from
`a specific channel or sub-channel. A generic network
`topologyis illustrated in Figure 1.
`
`Figure | Topology of a Generic Cable System
`SiGedes
`=c
`
`Software would be previewed before purchase,
`User documentation would be integrated into the soft-
`ware and accessed through a “*Help’’ command.
`Maintenance of software would be centrally controal-
`led.
`4, The consumer would always have the latest version.
`
`A study of
`the communication parameters of
`telephone, data, and cable networks
`indicates many
`factors which would militate against using the telephone
`network as a distribution medium. Among the more
`obvious are low data transmission rate,
`low peak load
`
`handling capability,
`inability to receive telephone calls
`ey A -
`CUSTORER 1
`when using the home computer, and the cost penalty of a
`
`re
`e
`<e
`eB [|
`measured, cistance oriented billing system.
`Ny
`°
`:f *
`
`oad awecgrnenCOFERHER a fBROP
`
`f
`Each channel of the cable system, on the other
`j i
`‘Ny
`hand, can deliver data at rates exceeding one thousand
`eRuag
` f
`SPRUE
`
`times that of a telephone circuit. Moreover, CATV pro-
`vides a full time, non-switched system with no penalty for
`timed billing or distance from the data source. In addition,
`when used for data distribution, the coaxial cable canstill
`be used Lo receive normal television programming.
`Having made the decision to use cable networks,
`other benefits soon became obvious. Cable operators
`would have new revenue potential
`through the sale of
`microcomputers and a whole range of data related services
`to their customers.
`
`
`
`i
`
`PMCExhibit 2078
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`Apple v. PMC
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 3
`Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`~~
`
`The following components reside at the studio or
`the head-end of the cable operator:-
`~~ Head-End Computer which stores and manages the
`applications software.
` Heacd-End CableAdapter (HECA) which formats the
`data into several parallel bit streams for transmission
`on the CATV network. The HECA contains modu-
`laters, which modulate each serial bit stream into
`appropriate analog signals, placing it into the TV fre-
`quency channel designated by the CATV operator.
`The Combiner at
`the CATY head-end mixes these
`data channels with regular television programs and
`transmits the signals to the hubs of the cable network
`and thence into the homes of subscribers via the coax-
`ial cable plant.
`At the terminal or customer end is the following
`equipment:
`~~ The Home Computer Cable Adapter (ACCA) which
`demodulates the data channels and re-formats the
`data for the Home Cable Computer. The HCCAis an
`addressable,
`tuneable intelligent modem with local
`and remote diagnostic capabilities.
`— The Home Cable Computer (HCC) which receives the
`data from the HCCA and executes the software (e.g.
`display audio-visual
`information, perform calcula-
`tions).
`Full Channel Data (PCD) encoding technique is
`employed for data transmission on the CATVnetwork.
`Compared with Vertical Blanking Interval (VBI) or Full
`Frame Data (FFD) transmission, FCD has the following
`advantages:-
`oo
`higher aggregate data throughput per channel
`~-
`higher rellability
`— lower cost
`
`--
`
`lower impact on cable loading and hence less impact
`on regulartelevision programmes
`The bit error rate (AER) performance of the com-
`munications channel U.e. modulator, CATV network and
`demodulator) is expected to be better than | error in 10**8
`for mast CATYsystems. However, NABU is not depen-
`dent on this BER for successful operation. Error control
`techniques are employed to ensure satisfactory per-
`formance over marginal CAT systems.
`
`HEAD-END CONFIGURATION
`
`The head end equipment consists of a Head-end
`Computer and a Head End Cable Adapter (HECA) as
`shown in Figure |. The functions of these items are
`elaborated below.
`
`~« The Head End Computerstores and manages applica-
`tions software from several sources. The software for
`each application is divided into segments, while each
`segment is sub-divided into data packets.
`-- The digital portion of the HECA attaches special for-
`matting
`information
`({addresses,
`headers,
`fag
`characters) to each data packet according to a NABU
`proprietary protocol.
`
`— Each data packet can be addressed to all customers or
`to a specific customer, so giving the system a messag-
`ing capability in addition to that of software distribu-
`tion. The CATV operator can thereby address a
`customer or update an HCCA on a global or selective
`basis.
`— Each data channel occupies a regular 6 MHz TV slot
`and carries data at 4.8 Mb/s. The modulation techni-
`que was carefully chosen for high speed,
`low error
`rate, low costs for the HOCCA and the HECA, and low
`impact on the CATYamplifiers,
`~~ Datacan be transmitted on up to 4 TVchannels. More
`channels may be used if required.
`— The centre frequency and the frequencyoffset of each
`data channel can be adjusted to meet the individual
`requirements of each CATYoperator.
`~- The signal
`levels of each modulated channel are
`individually adjustable by the CATVoperator.
`
`CUSTOMER-END CONFIGURATION
`
`The customer-end equipment contains the Home
`Computer Cable Adapter (HCCA) and the Home Cable
`Computer (4CC) as shown in Figure 2, The functions of
`eachare described below:-
`
`Customer-End Equipment (Functional Block
`Diagram)
`
`Figure 2
`
`
`
`
`-- The HCCA can be tuned by the HCC to any one of
`the 4 data channels being transmitted by the HECA.
`Alternatively, a video switch within the HCCA allows
`the cable signal ta be fed to a regular TV set or a
`channel converter for watching TV programs.
`- The HCCA demodulates the data broadcast cycle
`from the data channel to which it is tuned
`
`124
`
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`Apple v. PMC
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 4
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Depending on the information within the header of
`each packet, the HCCA either rejects a packet, or ac-
`cepts and processes it. If the data is intended for (or
`was requested by) the HCC, it transfers the packet to
`the HCC,
`Each data packet may belong to a tier level dictated by
`the CATV operator. The customer may subscribe to
`any number of ters. The HCCA checks the tier level
`of each requested packet
`and does not
`send
`unauthorized packets to theHCC,
`The HCCA contains a number of indicator lamps so
`that
`the customer can help the CATV operator to
`tliagnose the location of any problem. This feature
`reduces service calls as well as repair time in the field.
`The Home Cable Computer receives the data frorn the
`HCC.A and carries out the necessary application (e.g.
`display audio-visual information, play a game),
`
`Since the operating systern as well as the character sets
`of the HCC can be defined and changed from the
`head-end, the HCC can be mace to perform a much
`wider variety of tasks than if it were an inflexible
`device.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`The first versions of all these units went through
`successful technical trials in Ottawa in March 1982, Pro-
`duction, quantities are expected in the latter part of 1982.
`NABU would be pleased to entertain enquiries and make
`technical results available to the cable industry.
`
`
`
`
`
`JOHN L. HUGHES
`
`John Lee Hughes is Vice President, Strategic Plan-
`ning for NABU Manufacturing Corporation.
`In this
`capacity, Mr. Hughes has overall responsibility for market
`research, advanced technology, and short and long range
`strategic planning.
`Mr. Hughes is a 1962 graduate of American Univer-
`sity with a business administration degree and has done ad-
`vanced studies in digital systems at Massachusetts Institute
`of Technology. He has held the position of Vice President,
`Data Systems at Citibank, N.A. and Vice President, Inter-
`active Products for Automated Data Processing, Inc., one
`of the largest computing service organizations in the
`world.
`
`A, frequent lecturer on the subject, Mr. Hughes has
`been appropriately termed “‘The Father of Distributed
`Processing’’.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`Apple v. PMC
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 5
`Page 5
`
`

`

`
`
`CONVENTION TECHNICAL PROGRAM
`
`AND INDEX
`
`TUESDAY, JUNE 1 — 10:30 to 12:00,
`“PAY-TV TECHNICAL SESSION” — Chairman: Charmaine Eddy,
`Rogers Cablesystems Inc.
`
`Addressable Controlfor the Small System
`
`Charles “Chick” Eissler 0... ...0..... i
`
`Vidacom or System for Information on Demand (SLD)
`An Indusiry Approach to New Services
`
`Subscriber Terminal Evolution in RCI Systems
`
`Cable Pay-TVCost Analysis
`
`Michel Dufrense 2.0.0.0 0.0 00000006 7
`
`George Green oo. ee 14
`
`Peter Parkinson. ............. wae AO
`
`TUESDAY, JUNE 1 — 15:00 to 16:00
`“TECHNICIANS SESSION” — Chairman: Nick Hamilton-Piercy
`Rogers Cablesystems Inc.
`
`Subjective Assessment af Picture Quality
`
`Automated System Test Van -- Fast,Accurate and
`Convenient
`
`Paul W., Kaiser
`Gary Mcintosh .....0.0.0...0....... 26
`
`Geolf Heathcote
`Mike Palmer... 0.0.6 cnc eens 32
`
`WEDNESDAY, JUNE 2— 10:30 to 12:0,
`“MEW SERVICES TECHNICAL SESSION” — Chairman Edwin RK. Jarmain
`Cablesystems Engineering Lid.
`
`Cableguard: Makingif Work
`
`Commercial Data Communications over Cable
`Television Facilities
`
`Office Communications — A Marketfor the
`Canadian Cable Industry?
`
`400 MHz Network Planning
`
`Charles Elliott
`Stuart Paterson... 0.00.00 AQ
`
`Peter Makowchik ...............- A$
`
`Hans Brune... 0.00.00 ee cc ees 50
`
`Norman J. Slater... 0... .0.00..02...54
`
`Transportation Trunks and theKnowledge Network
`
`Gary Brothers ....... vtec eens Sg
`
`ll
`
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`Apple v. PMC
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 6
`Page 6
`
`

`

`THURSDAY, JUNE 3 — 8:45 to 10:30,
`“RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SESSION” — Chairman: Michel Dufresne
`Vidéotron Communications Lidge
`
`Infocable: New Services for Small Cable Systems
`
`Field Experience with the Broadcast Telidon
`Trial at WETA PBS TVStation, Washington, D.C.
`
`A Demand Access Video System
`
`Audio Subcarriers on Microwave and Satellite Signals
`
`An Analysis of the Delivery af Scrambled
`TV Signals vie Direct Broadcast Satellites
`
`The Orion System — The Satellite Signal Contral
`and Piracy Solution
`
`Rick Simpson
`Stuart Paterson .. 0.00.00. eee eee 60
`
`Chris Haslam... 0... 0.002 2c ee cnae 4
`
`Elmer H. Hara
`R. lan MacDonald... 0... 0.0 c eee 69
`
`Ned Mountain
`Heing Wegener .. 0.0.0. e eee eee 76
`
`Ken Hancock
`Dave Colo... ccc ec eee teens 83
`
`Orest J. Hanas
`Ir. Pieter den Toonder
`Prank Pennypacker............... 90
`
`THURSDAY, PUNE 3 — 8:45 to 10:30,
`“APPLICATIONS TECHNICAL SESSION” — Chairman: Rick Murphy,
`Communications Engineering Services Limited.
`
`Adaptive Techniquesfor Reducing Co-Channel
`and Impuise Noise Disturbances
`
`Transportable TV Uplinks and High Quality
`Audio Channels on a 14/12 GHz Satellite
`
`Status Monitoring, with Vital Siens Equipment
`
`Distortion Improvementsin 400-450 Miz
`Systems Using Tilted Output Levels
`
`A Feedforward Mini-Trunk, or Distribution
`Line, Amplifier with a Switchmode Power Supply
`
`The Use of Restricted Channels by Cable
`Television Systems
`
`Gerard Terreault........... beeen OG
`
`André Bigras
`Dave Sward . 0... c creer eaae 49
`
`Alan J. Whitlock... ..0.0...220005 LOS
`
`.
`
`Ron Solomon. ........0......0085 109
`
`Bob Blumenkranz ........0..00005 110
`
`John Dexter... 0. ee es Li4
`
`THURSDAY, JUNE 3 — 13:00 to 15:00,
`“TECHNICAL HIGHLIGHTS SESSION” -— Chairman: George D. Cormack
`Canadian Cable Television Association
`
`Telidon for Cable — An Evolutionary Approach
`
`Don Marvin... ce ee eee lls
`
`A Coaxial Cable Communications Network
`Architecturefor the [980"s & [990’s
`
`The NABU Concept - Distributed Data Processing
`vie Cable Networks.
`
`Harry K. Davis .. 0.00 eae 122
`
`John L. Hughes... 0006 cc ee 123
`
`|
`|
`
`
`
`Ul
`
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`Apple v. PMC
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 7
`Page 7
`
`

`

`INDEX ET PROGRAMME TECHNIQUES DU CONGRES
`
`MARDI, ler JUIN —10430 — 12h
`“TELEVISION A PEAGE ATELIER TECHNIQUE” — Présidente: Charmaine Eddy,
`Rogers Cablesystems Inc.
`
`La commande addressable en petit systéme
`de télédistribution
`
`Charles “Chick’’ Eissler... .....0.06. 1
`
`SID, (VIDACOM) un scénario Industriel
`
`Michel Dufresne ......... rr |
`
`L’évolution des terminaux d’abonnds dans les
`systémes RCE
`
`Analyse des couits de la télévision @ péage
`télédistribuée
`
`George Green oo eee 14
`
`Peter Parkingom.... 0.000002 0 ees 20
`
`MARDI, ler FUIN — 15h —- 16h
`“ATELIER POUR LES TECHNICIENS” — Président: Nick Hamilton-Piercy,
`Rogers Cablesystems Inc.
`
`Evaluation subjective de la qualité de Vimage
`
`Lafourgonnetie d’essail automatisée — une
`méthode rapide, pratique et précise
`
`Paul W. Kaiser
`Gary Mcintosh ... 00.0000. 0c ee nee 26
`
`Geoff Heathcote
`Mike Palmer ........004. beeen ee 32
`
`MERCREDIL, 2 IUIN — 10h 30—- 12h
`“LES NOUVEAUX SERVICES ATELIER TECHNIQUE” — Président: Edwin BK. Jarmain,
`Cablesystems Engineering Lid.
`
`Comment assurer U'efficactté du service
`CABLEGUARD
`
`La télécommunication de données commerciales
`par la télédistribution
`
`Charles Elliott
`Stuart Patersot.. 0.0... eee eee 4)
`
`Peter Makowchik ...........0006- 45
`
`
`
`Un réseau cdble pour les communications entre bureaux
`
`Hans Brome... ce cc eee 50
`
`La planification des réseaux en 400 MHz
`
`Lesvoles de transmission et le réseau de
`matiere grise
`
`
`
`Norman J. Slater... 00. cee ce eee 54
`
`Gary Brothers . 20.0. cee ee ee eee 59
`
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`Apple v. PMC
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 8
`Page 8
`
`Iv
`
`

`

`JEUDL, 3 JUIN — 8h 45 — 10h 30
`“A RECHERCHE ET LE DEVELOPPEMENT ATELIER TECHNIQUE” — Président: Michel Dufresne,
`Vidéotron Communications Ltée
`
`infocdble: Les nouveaux services et les petits
`systémes de télédistribution
`
`Essai sur le terrain du systéme Télidon a la station
`de télévision PAS WETA de Washington (2DC.)
`
`Un systéeme vidéo daccés @ la demande
`
`Sous-porteuses audio en signaux Ayperfréquences et
`satellites
`
`Analyse dela transmission des signaux
`brouillés de (élevision par satellite de rediodiffusion directe
`
`Le systéme Orion ~~ le contréle du signal satellisé
`comme moyen de supprimer les caplawes ilicites
`
`Rick Simpson
`Stuart Paterson .. 0.00000 cea ee ee 60
`
`Chris Haslam... 000. 0c ee 64
`
`Elmer H. Hara
`R. lan MacDonald... 2.0.0.0... 000. 69
`
`Ned Mountain
`Heing Wegener... 0.06.0. eee 76
`
`Ken Hancock
`Dave Coll oo... ccc eee ee 83
`
`Orest J, Nanas
`Ir. Pieter den Toonder
`Frank Pennypacker.. 0.0.0.0... 0000- 90)
`
`JEUDI3 JUIN —8h 45 — 10h 30
`“LES APPLICATIONS ATELIER TECHNIQUE” — Président: Rick Murphy,
`Communications Engineering Services Limited.
`
`Techniques souples de réduction des interférences de
`canal adjacent ef des impulsions parasites.
`
`Liens ascendants transportables de télévision et voles
`audio de qualité grace @ un satelite 14-72 GHz
`
`Gérard Terreault 0.00.00 0 cee eee OG
`
`:
`André Bigras
`Dave Sward.. 0... ee ee eee 99
`
`Controle d’etat au moyen d’un logiciel Vitel Signs
`
`Alan J. Whithock 20.0.0... 0 cea 108
`
`L'inclinaison des niveaux de sortie comume moyen de
`géupprimer les distorsions en systémes de 400-450 GHz
`
`Un amplificateur de mini-circuit ou ligne de distribution @
`contmmiande prédictive ef @ alimentation conunutable
`
`L’utilisation parles systémes de
`télédistrilution de canaux restreints
`
`Ron Solomon... . 0.000.225 eae 109
`
`Bob Bhumenkranz .....0.0.0...0 0005 110
`
`John Dexter... 0. oe ew es Li4
`
`JEUDI3 JUIN 13h — 15h
`“FATS SAILLANTS EN TECHNIQUE” — Président: George D. Cormack,
`Association canadienne de télévision par cable
`
`Télidon en idlédistribution: son évolution
`
`Don Marvin. ....0...0.000000045 oe LES
`
`Un réseau de télédistribution coaxial dans les
`années [980 et 1990
`
`Le conceptNABU;la télématique par voie de
`réseaux de (élédistribution
`
`Harry K. Davis . 0... ee 122
`
`John L. Hughes... 0.0.0.0 ccc eae 123
`
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`PMC Exhibit 2078
`Apple v. PMC
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00753
`IPR2016-00753
`Page 9
`Page 9
`
`
`
`
`
`