UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent No.: 7,752,649
`Case No.: IPR2016-00753
`Patent No.: 8,559,635
`Case No.: IPR2016-00754
`Patent No.: 8,191,091
`Case No.: IPR2016-00755
`For: Signal Processing Apparatus and Methods
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF THOMAS J. SCOTT, JR., ESQ.
`SUPPORTING THE PATENTABILITY OF
`U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,752,649, 8,559,635, AND 8,191,091
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent No.: 7,752,649
`Case No.: IPR2016-00753
`Patent No.: 8,559,635
`Case No.: IPR2016-00754
`Patent No.: 8,191,091
`Case No.: IPR2016-00755
`For: Signal Processing Apparatus and Methods
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF THOMAS J. SCOTT, JR., ESQ.
`SUPPORTING THE PATENTABILITY OF
`U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,752,649, 8,559,635, AND 8,191,091
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 1
`
`
`
`
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`I, Thomas, J. Scott, Jr., being over 18 years of age, submit this
`
`1.
`
`declaration concerning “Secondary Considerations of Non-obviousness”
`
`relating to U.S. Patent No. 7,752,649 (“the ’749 patent”), U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,559,635 (“the ’635 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,191,091 (“the ’091
`
`patent”) (collectively, “the Challenged Patents”).
`
`2.
`
`I am the Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Patent
`
`Owner Personalized Media Communications, LLC (“PMC”) and have been
`
`in this position since April 2014. Prior to joining PMC, I had been serving
`
`as a counsel for the company and its predecessor entities, as well as its
`
`founder, Mr. John C. Harvey, for over 25 years.
`
`3.
`
`As a registered patent attorney, I understand that “secondary
`
`considerations of non-obviousness” are factors established by the courts that
`
`can be used to attempt to demonstrate the non-obviousness of a patented
`
`invention, and include: (i) whether and to what extent the invention was
`
`commercially successful; and (ii) whether and to what extent there was
`
`industry praise of the claimed invention.
`
`I.
`
`THE PMC PATENT FAMILY AND CLAIMED INVENTIONS
`4.
`PMC owns a patent portfolio comprising 97 issued U.S. patents
`
`(including the Challenged Patents) and 7 pending U.S. patent applications.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 2
`
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`All these PMC patents and applications belong in the same
`
`patent family. The first patent, U.S. Patent No. 4,694,490 issued from an
`
`application filed on November 3, 1981 (“the 1981 disclosure”). The second
`
`patent, U.S. Patent No. 4,704,725 issued from a continuation of the
`
`November 3, 1981 application. The rest of the patents (including the
`
`Challenged Patents) issued from applications that are all based on an
`
`application filed on September 11, 1987 (“the 1987 disclosure”) which was a
`
`continuation-in-part of the November 3, 1981 application.
`
`6.
`
`Claiming priority ultimately to the same 1981 and 1987
`
`disclosures, the Challenged Patents all share the same specification as most
`
`of the patents and applications in the PMC patent family.
`
`7.
`
`The claimed inventions of the ’649 Patent are directed to
`
`methods of processing signals in a receiver. In claim 39, for example,
`
`signals are processed in a television receiver that has multiple processors.
`
`An information transmission that includes digital television signals and a
`
`message stream is received at the television receiver. The message stream is
`
`detected and at least a portion of the message stream is input to a control
`
`processor. Control information in the inputted message stream portion is
`
`selected and communicated to at least one register memory. Stored function
`
`invoking data is compared to the contents of the register memory. The
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 3
`
`
`
`
`
`digital television signals are input to the multiple processors on the basis of
`
`one or more matches. The digital television signals are processed
`
`simultaneously at two or more of the multiple processors, and television
`
`programming included in the digital television signals is displayed.
`
`8.
`
`The claimed inventions of the ’635 patent are directed to a
`
`programming transmission and receiving systems and methods with access
`
`control. The ’635 patent describes using multiple decryption keys and
`
`multiple decryption algorithms for the decryption of encrypted video and
`
`audio. Not only are the video and audio encrypted, but so are the decryption
`
`keys. The decryption keys may be encrypted and transmitted with the
`
`programming transmission so that they must be decrypted before they can be
`
`used to decrypt the programming. Moreover, the instructions that are
`
`transmitted to cause the decryption may themselves be encrypted, thus
`
`requiring that they be decrypted before they are loaded and executed.
`
`9.
`
`The claimed inventions of the ’091 patent are directed to
`
`various decryption key management techniques implemented across a
`
`content distribution network. According to the claimed methods, when a
`
`receiver station receives an “information transmission” including “encrypted
`
`information,” one or more “instruct-to-enable signals” may be detected to
`
`allow the receiver station to locate or obtain decryption-enabling information
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 4
`
`
`
`
`
`such as decryption key(s), such that the encrypted information can be
`
`decrypted based on the enabling information in order to output protected
`
`programming. For example, independent claim 13 covers the detection and
`
`use of “an instruct-to-enable signal” in order to determine “a fashion in
`
`which said receiver station locates a first decryption key.” Independent
`
`claim 20 covers the detection and processing of two “instruct-to-enable
`
`signals” including “processor instructions” for obtaining two decryption
`
`keys that are both used for decryption of the encrypted information.
`
`Independent claim 26 covers detecting “an instruct-to-enable signal,”
`
`“automatically tuning said receiver station to a channel designated by said
`
`instruct-to-enable signal,” and “receiving enabling information from a
`
`remote source based on said step of tuning” that is used for decryption of
`
`encrypted content.
`
`II.
`
`COMMERCIAL SUCCESS OF THE INVENTION
`10. PMC’s numerous licenses of the patent family (that includes the
`
`Challenged Patents) reflect the commercial success of the patented
`
`technology and are thus relevant indicia of non-obviousness.
`
`11. Because the inventions of the Challenged Patents provide,
`
`among other things, innovative techniques for decrypting and/or decoding
`
`digital content in a network environment, they have experienced exceptional
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 5
`
`
`
`commercial success. Numerous media and telecommunications companies
`
`use PMC’s technology, including providers of electronic media, and
`
`particularly electronic media content that has to be protected against
`
`unauthorized access and can only be decoded by authorized users. Such
`
`content protection is achieved through the various decryption key
`
`management and distribution techniques covered by the ’635 patent and the
`
`’091 patent. Furthermore, the transmission, receiving, processing, and
`
`decoding of multiplexed content streams also employ the signal processing
`
`techniques covered by the ’649 patent.
`
`12. Similarly, the digital pay-television industry uses the patented
`
`technology, including not just the satellite television providers (DirecTV,
`
`DISH Network, etc.) but also digital cable systems and fiber-optic systems
`
`such as Comcast, Cox, Time Warner Cable, Verizon’s FIOS and AT&T’s U-
`
`verse. OEM providers, such as Motorola, Scientific-Atlanta (now part of
`
`Cisco), and Sony Electronics, who provide set-top boxes and content
`
`delivery networks to the aforementioned content providers, implement the
`
`patented technology. Pay-television providers have a combined total of
`
`approximately 100 million subscribers. Substantially all of these services
`
`now digitally encode content and use technology covered by the patent to
`
`provide key functionality, such as the use of control and information signals
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 6
`
`
`
`
`
`embedded in electronic media content to decrypt and/or decode digital
`
`content.
`
`13. Because of this prevalent use of PMC’s technology, the PMC
`
`patent family (including the Challenged Patents) has been the subject of
`
`extensive licensing establishing the belief of industry participants in the
`
`validity and relevance of the patents. To date, the PMC patent family has
`
`been the subject of licenses to more than a dozen licensees in transactions
`
`generating revenue to PMC and its investors in excess of $350M. The
`
`specific per-unit royalty figures and lump sum payments for each license are
`
`not disclosed below as a result of confidentiality provisions.
`
`14. On March 2, 1994, PMC licensed its patents and applications to
`
`StarSight Telecast, Inc. on an exclusive basis for a significant one-time
`
`payment and stock options in StarSight. The license provided that StarSight
`
`and PMC would work together to file additional patent applications, which
`
`in 1995 included the application leading to the Challenged Patents. The
`
`field-of-use related to the use of program guides for channel navigation
`
`allowing for users to select programs.
`
`15. On October 1, 1995, StarSight, with PMC’s consent,
`
`sublicensed PMC’s patents to Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. for
`
`making DSS (Digital Satellite Subscriber) products. Thomson was granted
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 7
`
`
`
`non-exclusive use of the PMC patents related to a DSS program guide and
`
`recording functions. Thomson agreed to pay per-unit royalties for DSS
`
`receiver units. Thomson has sold many millions of DSS products under its
`
`brand and has sourced millions of DSS products sold under the brand names
`
`of others.
`
`16. On October 31, 1995, PMC entered into a license and option
`
`agreement with Sony whereby Sony agreed to pay a per-unit royalty for set-
`
`top boxes using the PMC technology, including the patented inventions, for
`
`compatibility with the DirecTV system. Sony sold many millions of set-top
`
`boxes subject to this agreement.
`
`17. On January 31, 1996, PMC entered into a license agreement
`
`with The Weather Channel, Inc. and Landmark Communications, Inc. in
`
`order to settle litigation. The licensees obtained worldwide non-exclusive
`
`rights to deliver certain types of content for a significant one-time payment
`
`and an option for additional rights in the patents.
`
`18.
`
`In August 1999, PMC sent Sony a letter amending the 1995
`
`agreement to provide for certain other receiver products to be licensed on a
`
`per-unit royalty basis. In March 2002, PMC and Sony entered into an
`
`agreement reaffirming the 1995 license agreement.
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 8
`
`
`
`19.
`
`In January 2000, PMC Satellite LLC, a wholly-owned
`
`subsidiary of PMC, entered into a field-of-use license agreement with
`
`Pegasus Development Corporation. Pegasus agreed to pay PMC Satellite a
`
`significant license payment for the specific field-of-use granted along with a
`
`strategic investment in PMC. The license gave Pegasus the right to license
`
`others in the patents for the field-of-use granted to Pegasus. Pegasus and
`
`PMC filed a lawsuit against DIRECTV (discussed further below) on
`
`December 2002 that was settled with a license agreement announced in July
`
`2013.
`
`20. On December 29, 2000 PMC entered into a comprehensive
`
`agreement with Gemstar-TV Guide that included an investment in PMC
`
`made by Gemstar-TV Guide and the grant of multiple field-of-use licenses
`
`by to Gemstar-TV Guide. PMC and its investors received a substantial
`
`payment under the agreement.
`
`21. More recently, on May 18, 2011, Cisco Systems, Inc., and
`
`Scientific-Atlanta LLC licensed the PMC patent family (including the
`
`Challenged Patents) in a transaction that included a substantial payment.
`
`This was a nonexclusive license granted in settlement of litigation to make,
`
`use, and sell products and services of or provided by Cisco or its affiliates.
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 9
`
`
`
`
`
`22. On June 1, 2011, Motorola Mobility agreed to license the
`
`Challenged Patents, among other PMC patents, in a transaction in settlement
`
`of litigation that included a substantial payment.
`
`23.
`
`In July 2013, DIRECTV, LLC, Hughes Electronics
`
`Corporation, Technicolor USA, Inc., and Philips Electronics North America
`
`Corporation, agreed to license the Challenged Patents, among other PMC
`
`patents, for a substantial one-time payment in settlement of litigation. The
`
`payment is to be shared between PMC and co-plaintiff Pegasus
`
`Development Corporation.
`
`24.
`
`In January 2014, Zynga, Inc. agreed to license the Challenged
`
`Patents, among other PMC patents.
`
`25.
`
`In February 2014, Panasonic Corporation agreed to license the
`
`Challenged Patents, among other PMC patents, for a substantial one-time
`
`payment and further agreed to a long-term licensing program relationship
`
`with PMC. This license was not entered into in connection with the
`
`settlement of litigation. Panasonic licensed the PMC patents, including the
`
`Challenged Patents, with knowledge of the then-pending inter partes review
`
`proceedings involving Amazon, Inc.
`
`26.
`
`In April 2014, Single Touch Interactive R&D IP LLC, Single
`
`Touch Systems, Inc., and PMC formed VideoStar LLC, joint venture to
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 10
`
`
`
`
`
`exploit unique target licensing opportunities distinct and separate from the
`
`current licensing programs of Single Touch and PMC, using Single Touch’s
`
`video streaming, and PMC’s pioneering digital broadcast, delivery and
`
`payment patents.
`
`27.
`
`In May 2015, Echostar Corporation and DISH Network
`
`Corporation agreed to license the Challenged Patents, among other PMC
`
`patents, for a substantial payment in settlement of litigation.
`
`28.
`
`In June 2015, ARRIS Group, Inc. agreed to license the
`
`Challenged Patents, among other PMC patents, for itself and certain
`
`subsidiaries, for substantial payments. The parties were not engaged in
`
`litigation. Like Panasonic, ARRIS licensed the PMC patents, including the
`
`Challenged Patents, with knowledge of the then-pending inter partes review
`
`proceedings involving Amazon, Inc.
`
`29.
`
`In June 2015, PMC concluded a new patent licensing
`
`agreement with Sharp Corporation and its subsidiaries. The parties were not
`
`engaged in litigation. Like Panasonic and ARRIS, Sharp licensed the PMC
`
`patents, including the Challenged Patents, with knowledge of the then-
`
`pending inter partes review proceedings involving Amazon, Inc.
`
`30. These licenses and sublicenses under the PMC patent family,
`
`including the Challenged Patents, attest to the industry’s recognition of the
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 11
`
`
`
`
`
`validity and relevance of the patents, particularly because many of the
`
`license amounts are orders of magnitude above the cost of defense in an
`
`infringement action.
`
`31. The fact that some licensee companies have chosen not just to
`
`purchase licenses but also to make equity investments in PMC also
`
`demonstrates their belief in the validity of the Challenged Patents, among
`
`other PMC patents.
`
`32. This success is attributable not to any particular feature by
`
`itself, but rather to the combination of unique command-and-control
`
`functionalities embodied in PMC’s inventions. Combinations of some of
`
`these features are recited in the claims of the Challenged Patents.
`
`III. PRAISE BY OTHERS/INDUSTRY RECOGNITION: OCEAN
`TOMO
`33. PMC has received professional acclaim and acknowledgement
`
`of success. Such recognition serves as strong evidence of non-obviousness.
`
`See Vulcan Eng’g. Co., Inc. v. Fata Aluminum, Inc., 278 F.3d 1366, 1373
`
`(Fed. Cir. 2002) (“Appreciation by contemporaries skilled in the field of the
`
`invention is a useful indicator of whether the invention would have been
`
`obvious to such persons at the time it was made.”).
`
`34. April 26, 2011, Ocean Tomo, LLC issued its Ocean Tomo
`
`Quality Inventor Study in four technology categories. (Ex. 2049.) Ocean
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 12
`
`
`
`Tomo, LLC is an independent, third-party firm that provides an industry
`
`leading array of financial products and services related to intangible assets
`
`such as patents. As part of its services, it analyzed and assessed the value of
`
`patents that have been issued at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. In
`
`2010, Ocean Tomo undertook a study of the top patent inventors relative to
`
`the quality of their 2010 issued and in-force patents.
`
`35. The study was performed using the Ocean Tomo
`
`PatentRatings® system, which is “the first market-validated software
`
`platform for objectively assessing patent quality, relative value, and
`
`competitive trends for patents, patent portfolios, companies, and technology
`
`sectors. The Ocean Tomo PatentRatings® System uses a patented method
`
`of patent quality valuation, (U.S. Patent Nos. 6,556,992, 7,657,476 and
`
`7,716,226 and other U.S. and foreign patents pending) that is statistically
`
`based calculating the relative quality of all patents issued by the U.S. Patent
`
`Office since 1976 using more than 50 independent and objective factors that
`
`are correlated to patent value.” Id.
`
`36. Regarding the PMC patents, the Study states: “[i]n Wireless,
`
`the top rated inventor with 16 patents in USPC 455, 370 & 375 is John
`
`Harvey. These patents have an average IPQ score of 235.7 which puts his
`
`patents in the top 0.1% of the approximate 220,000, active U.S. utility
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 13
`
`
`
`
`
`patents granted in 2010.”1 Id. (emphasis added). The Challenged Patents
`
`and these patents are part of the same patent family and share the same
`
`specification. This independent industry praise is strong objective evidence
`
`of the non-obviousness of the inventions.
`
`IV. PRAISE BY OTHERS/INDUSTRY RECOGNITION:
`CITATION OF PMC PATENTS BY OTHERS
`
`37. Additionally, evidence of “forward citations,” in other words,
`
`third party patents and publications that cite to the PMC patent family
`
`(including the Challenged Patents), evidence industry recognition of the
`
`significance of the inventions. It is my understanding that a number of
`
`valuation studies find a positive correlation between a patent’s forward
`
`citations and its value. See, e.g., Ex. 2047 at 1 (“… when a patent is cited by
`
`a large number of subsequent patents (hereafter, forward citations), this
`
`indicates that the patented invention has led to a number of successful lines
`
`
`1 The USPC classes correspond to telecommunications (455), multiplex
`
`communications (370), and pulse or digital communications (375). The
`
`sixteen patents in these USPC classes that issued in 2010 are US 7,860,249,
`
`US 7,860,131, US 7,849,479, US 7,831,204, US 7,830,925, US 7,784,082,
`
`US 7,783,252, US 7,774,809, US 7,769,344, US 7,769,170, US 7,764,685,
`
`US 7,761,890, US 7,752,650, US 7,752,649, US 7,747,217, US 7,734,251.
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 14
`
`
`
`
`
`of innovation. Thus, the invention is likely to be of high technological
`
`influence (defined as the technological impact that a patent has on
`
`subsequent inventions) and thus highly economically valuable.”)(emphasis
`
`in original). See also Ex. 2048 at 1 (“A useful, efficient and increasingly
`
`utilised indication of the value of a patent is the number of times that it is
`
`cited by a later patent (‘forward citations’). More valuable patents (that is,
`
`patents for which there is relatively high demand for the technology
`
`described in that patent) tend to be cited more often than less valuable
`
`patents. An analysis of patent citations to determine the value of patents has
`
`been used in the academic literature since at least the 1980s. The basic
`
`concept has broad recognition and has been extensively tested empirically. It
`
`is often used in the commercial practice of valuing intellectual property and
`
`cited in studies by WIPO and the OECD.”
`
`38. The PMC patent family has been cited by several hundred
`
`patents and publications.
`
`39. Notably, a number of U.S. patents assigned to Apple Inc. cite
`
`the PMC patents. For example, PMC’s U.S. Patent No. 5,335,277 was cited
`
`as relevant prior art by the patent office during examination of Apple’s U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,111,842. During prosecution of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,799,461
`
`and 9,451,019, Apple itself cited PMC’s U.S. Patent Nos. 4,694,490,
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 15
`
`
`
`4,704,725, 4,965,825, 5,109,414, and 5,233,654 as prior art relevant to
`
`Apple’s claimed inventions. PMC’s U.S. Patent No. 9,210,370 was cited as
`
`relevant prior art by the patent office during examination of Apple’s U.S.
`
`Patent No. 9,319,405.
`
`40. A partial list of patents and publications that cite the PMC
`
`patents is presented in the table below.
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US8111842B2
`
`US8799461B2
`
`US9451019B2
`
`US9319405B2
`
`US20070022447A1
`
`Filter adaptation based on volume setting for
`certification enhancement in a handheld wireless
`communications device
`
`System for collecting, analyzing, and transmitting
`information relevant to transportation networks
`
`System for collecting, analyzing, and transmitting
`information relevant to transportation networks
`
`System and methods for assignation and use of
`media content subscription service privileges
`
`System and Methods for Enhancing the
`Experience of Spectators Attending a Live
`Sporting Event, with Automated Video Stream
`Switching Functions
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 16
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US20030052916A1
`
`System and method for controlling networked
`devices and accessing, manipulating and viewing
`internet and non-internet related information
`through multiple sessions
`
`US20030074447A1
`
`Intuitive mapping between explicit and implicit
`personalization
`
`US20010041612A1
`
`Systems and methods for cross-platform access to
`a wagering interface
`
`US20030123858A1
`
`Input-output circuit, recording apparatus and
`reproduction apparatus for digital video signal
`
`US20030044165A1
`
`Video data recorder with for recording predefined
`format shows
`
`US20030196203A1
`
`Electronic television program guide schedule
`system and method with remote product ordering
`
`US20030028903A1
`
`System and method for storing and processing
`data for display on a display device
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 17
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US20030110501A1
`
`Personalizing media presentations based on a
`target duration
`
`US20030028871A1
`
`Behavior profile system and method
`
`US20030120750A1
`
`Device based detection of user preferences in a
`home networking environment
`
`US20020052197A1
`
`Cordless phone back link for interactive television
`system
`
`US20030125822A1 Wagering interface system and method
`
`US20030177497A1
`
`Video clipping system and method
`
`US20020152476A1
`
`Audio/video programming and charging system
`and method
`
`US20030112276A1
`
`User augmentation of content
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 18
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US20030182658A1
`
`System and method for preprogrammed
`purchasing of television offered products
`
`US20030028391A1
`
`System and method for enabling distribution and
`brokering of content information
`
`US20020038257A1
`
`Apparatus for transmitting and receiving
`executable applications as for a multimedia system
`
`US7730512B2
`
`Audio and video transmission and receiving
`system
`
`US7818773B2
`
`Audio and video transmission and receiving
`system
`
`US6215484B1
`
`Compressed digital-data interactive program
`system
`
`US6204843B1
`
`Compressed digital-data interactive program
`system
`
`US6252586B1
`
`Compressed digital-data interactive program
`system
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 19
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US6181334B1
`
`Compressed digital-data interactive program
`system
`
`US5537141A
`
`Distance learning system providing individual
`television participation, audio responses and
`memory for every student
`
`US7305691B2
`
`System and method for providing targeted
`programming outside of the home
`
`US5724091A
`
`Compressed digital data interactive program
`system
`
`US5861881A
`
`Interactive computer system for providing an
`interactive presentation with personalized video,
`audio and graphics responses for multiple viewers
`
`US5585858A
`
`Simulcast of interactive signals with a
`conventional video signal
`
`US5632007A
`
`Interactive system and method for offering expert
`based interactive programs
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 20
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US5682196A
`
`Three-dimensional (3D) video presentation system
`providing interactive 3D presentation with
`personalized audio responses for multiple viewers
`
`US7448063B2
`
`Digital interactive system for providing full
`interactivity with live programming events
`
`US7075899B2
`
`System and method for providing private in-band
`data to digital set-top boxes in a broadcast
`environment
`
`US7079176B1
`
`Digital interactive system for providing full
`interactivity with live programming events
`
`US8095949B1
`
`Electronic book with restricted access features
`
`US8073695B1
`
`Electronic book with voice emulation features
`
`US8548813B2
`
`Electronic book with voice emulation features
`
`
`
`21
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 21
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US6578203B1
`
`Audio/video signal distribution system for head
`mounted displays
`
`US5650994A
`
`Operation support system for service creation and
`network provisioning for video dial tone networks
`
`US6490356B1
`
`Broadcast receiving system comprising a
`computer and a decoder
`
`US8015097B2
`
`Securities trading system with multiple levels of
`interest
`
`US7555282B2
`
`Methods and systems for retrieving data stored in
`a database
`
`US8566215B2
`
`Methods and systems for retrieving data stored in
`a database
`
`US8560427B2
`
`Methods and systems for retrieving data stored in
`a database
`
`US8547199B2
`
`System for retrieving data stored in a database
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 22
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US8560426B2
`
`Methods and systems for retrieving data stored in
`database
`
`US8626131B2
`
`Methods and systems for retrieving data stored in
`a database
`
`US8588729B2
`
`Method for retrieving data stored in a database
`
`US8554661B2
`
`Methods and systems for retrieving data stored in
`a database
`
`US20060108434A1
`
`Impartial co-management to aid crop marketing
`
`US6314574B1
`
`Information distribution system
`
`US6789198B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US6188869B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`
`
`23
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 23
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US6339693B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US6317785B1
`
`Information processing apparatuses for extracting
`first linkage reference if a second set of
`displayable set is selected
`
`US6609202B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US6347215B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US6349409B1
`
`Information distribution and processing apparatus
`being connected to a local display
`
`US6343380B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US6766140B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`
`
`24
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 24
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US6772344B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US6253059B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US6473860B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US6021307A
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US6553239B1
`
`Low power, short range point-to-multipoint
`communications system
`
`US6476825B1
`
`Hand-held video viewer and remote control device
`
`US8578410B2
`
`Video and digital multimedia aggregator content
`coding and formatting
`
`US7590993B1
`
`Method and apparatus for gathering programs
`watched data
`
`
`
`25
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 25
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US7770196B1
`
`Set top terminal for organizing program options
`available in television delivery system
`
`US8060905B1
`
`Television delivery system having interactive
`electronic program guide
`
`US7836481B1
`
`Set top terminal for generating an interactive
`electronic program guide for use with television
`delivery system
`
`US8621521B2
`
`Video and digital multimedia aggregator
`
`US8347345B1
`
`Television terminal modem
`
`US7571457B1
`
`Advanced set top terminal with electronic mailbox
`for cable television delivery systems
`
`US8276183B1
`
`Television terminal data storage
`
`
`
`26
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 26
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US6509908B1
`
`Personal navigator system
`
`US5408516A
`
`Device and method for telephony interconnection
`intended to offer continuity of service to
`independent stations in a communications network
`
`US7181758B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US7508789B2
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US7627750B1
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US7991347B1
`
`System and method for accessing set of digital
`data at a remote site
`
`US7830830B2
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 27
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US7522554B2
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US5790753A
`
`System for downloading computer software
`programs
`
`US6408437B1
`
`Reprogrammable terminal for suggesting
`programs offered on a television program delivery
`system
`
`US6463585B1
`
`Targeted advertisement using television delivery
`systems
`
`US6201536B1
`
`Network manager for cable television system
`headends
`
`US6738978B1
`
`Method and apparatus for targeted advertising
`
`US6539548B1
`
`Operations center for a television program
`packaging and delivery system
`
`
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 28
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US6515680B1
`
`Set top terminal for television delivery system
`
`US7835989B1
`
`Electronic book alternative delivery systems
`
`US7401286B1
`
`Electronic book electronic links
`
`US7849393B1
`
`Electronic book connection to world watch live
`
`US5986690A
`
`Electronic book selection and delivery system
`
`US6052554A
`
`Television program delivery system
`
`US5734853A
`
`Set top terminal for television delivery systems |
`Set top terminal for cable television delivery
`systems
`
`
`
`29
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 29
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US7716349B1
`
`Electronic book library/bookstore system
`
`US7299501B2
`
`Electronic book selection and delivery system
`having encryption and security features
`
`US7509270B1
`
`Electronic Book having electronic commerce
`features
`
`US7336788B1
`
`Electronic book secure communication with home
`subsystem
`
`US7861166B1
`
`Resizing document pages to fit available hardware
`screens
`
`US7865567B1
`
`Virtual on-demand electronic book
`
`US7865405B2
`
`Electronic book having electronic commerce
`features
`
`US8117286B2
`
`Method and apparatus for redirection of server
`external hyper-link references
`
`
`
`30
`
`
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2020
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-00754
`Page 30
`
`
`
`Publication Number
`
`Title
`
`US7702752B2
`
`Method and apparatus for redirection of server
`external hyper-link references
`
`US6662007B2
`
`Cordless phone back link for interactive television
`system
`
`US7840176B2
`
`Information distribution and processing system
`
`US7310051B2
`
`Bond trading system
`
`US8046697B2
`
`System and method for customizing an interface
`related to accessing, manipulating and viewing
`internet and non-internet related information
`
`US5175926A
`
`Method of manufacturing an automotive sound
`system
`
`US5127057A
`
`INTEGRAL SOUND SYSTEM HAVING
`INTERCHANGEABLE MODULES WITH
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
