`
`IPR2016-00754
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`Patent Owner’s Notice of Appeal
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`IPR2016-00754
`Patent No. 8,559,635 B1
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00754
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`Patent Owner’s Notice of Appeal
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 141-144 and 319, and 37 C.F.R. §§ 90.2 and 90.3,
`
`
`
`notice is hereby given that Patent Owner Personalized Media Communications
`
`LLC appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the
`
`Final Written Decision entered September 8, 2022 (Paper 57) in IPR2016-00754
`
`(Exhibit A), and all prior and interlocutory rulings related thereto or subsumed
`
`therein, to the extent they are adverse to Patent Owner. Patent Owner is also filing
`
`today a notice of appeal in IPR2016-01520, which the Board resolved in the same
`
`Final Written Decision and which addresses claims from the same patent.
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a)(3)(ii), Patent Owner further indicates
`
`that the issues on appeal include, but are not limited to:
`
`(1) whether the Board erred in holding that claims 7, 21, and 29 are
`
`anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 4,337,483 (“Guillou”), including, but not limited to,
`
`(a) whether the Board erred in construing the word “processor” in independent
`
`claim 21 to encompass any “device that operates on data,” as opposed to a device
`
`that performs operations according to instructions; and (b) whether, in construing
`
`the word “processor,” the Board failed to adequately account for the applicant’s
`
`statements made during prosecution;
`
`(2) whether the Board erred in holding that claims 4, 13, 28, and 30 are
`
`obvious based on Guillou, including, but not limited to, (a) whether the Board
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00754
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`Patent Owner’s Notice of Appeal
`
`
`erred in construing “video” in claim 4 to include teletext; (b) whether the Board
`
`erred in construing “executable instructions” in claim 13 to encompass data
`
`processed by a device as opposed to instructions that control the operation of a
`
`device; (c) whether the Board erred in construing “changing a decryption
`
`technique” in claim 13 to encompass changing a decryption key; and (d) whether,
`
`in construing the terms identified in (a)-(c) above, the Board failed to adequately
`
`account for the applicant’s statements made during prosecution;
`
`(3) whether the Board erred in holding that claim 4 is obvious based on U.S.
`
`Patent No. 4,388,643 (“Aminetzah”) and U.S. Patent No. 3,743,767 (“Bitzer”),
`
`including, but not limited to, (a) whether the Board erred in construing “video” in
`
`claim 4 to include teletext; and (b) whether, in construing “video” in claim 4 to
`
`include teletext, the Board failed to adequately account for the applicant’s
`
`statements made during prosecution;
`
`(4) whether, in arriving at its decision, the Board acted in a manner that was
`
`arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with
`
`law, or based on factual findings unsupported by substantial evidence; and
`
`(5) whether the Board erred in any finding or determination supporting or
`
`related to those issues, as well as all other issues decided adversely to Patent
`
`Owner in any orders, decisions, rulings, and opinions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00754
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`Patent Owner’s Notice of Appeal
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 90.3, this Notice of Appeal is timely, having been
`
`filed within 63 days after the date of the Final Written Decision.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 142 and 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a), a copy of this Notice of
`
`Appeal is being filed simultaneously with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, the
`
`Clerk’s Office for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and
`
`the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 10, 2022
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/Douglas J. Kline/
`Douglas J. Kline (Reg. No. 35,574)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`100 Northern Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210-1980
`Tel.: (617) 570-1000
`Fax: (617) 523-1231
`dkline@goodwinlaw.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00754
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`Patent Owner’s Notice of Appeal
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 90.2(a)(1) and 104.2(a), I hereby certify that, in
`
`addition to being filed electronically through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s
`
`P-TACTS system, a true and correct original version of the foregoing PATENT
`
`OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL is being filed by hand delivery on November
`
`10, 2022, with the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, at
`
`the following address:
`
`Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`c/o Office of the General Counsel
`Madison Building East
`600 Dulany Street
`Alexandria, VA 22313
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a)(2) and Federal Circuit Rule 15(a)(1), and
`
`Rule 52(a), (e), I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL is being filed in the United States
`
`Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on this day, November 10, 2022, and that
`
`the filing fee is being paid electronically using pay.gov.
`
`I further certify that the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF
`
`APPEAL was served electronically via e-mail, as agreed to by counsel, on
`
`November 10, 2022, on the following counsel for Petitioner:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Marcus Sernel
`Joel Merkin
`Eugene Goryunov
`Gregory Arovas
`Alan Rabinowitz
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`msernel@kirkland.com
`jmerkin@kirkland.com
`egoryunov@kirkland.com
`garovas@kirkland.com
`arabinowitz@kirkland.com
`Apple-PMC-PTAB@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00754
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`Patent Owner’s Notice of Appeal
`
`
`/Douglas J. Kline/
`Douglas J. Kline (Reg. No. 35,574)
`
`
`
`
`