throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
` Paper 21
` Entered: April 29, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2016-00753
`Patent 7,752,649 B1
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before KARL D. EASTHOM, TRENTON WARD, and
`GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BRADEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Joint Motion to Terminate
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.72, 42.74(c)
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00753
`Patent 7,752,649 B1
`
`
`
`On March 9, 2017, with Board authorization, the parties filed a joint
`
`motion to terminate the proceeding (Paper 19), along with what they indicate
`
`is their written settlement agreement (Ex. 1029). According to counsel, the
`
`parties have settled their disputes, and have reached agreement to terminate
`
`this IPR proceeding, which challenged the patentability of U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,752,649 B1 (“the ’649 patent”). See Paper 19, 1. The parties further
`
`request confidential treatment of the settlement agreement, pursuant to 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Paper 20.
`
`The parties state the above-identified IPR petition is related to a
`
`lawsuit filed in the Eastern District of Texas, Personalized Media
`
`Communications LLC. V. Apple Inc., Case No. 2:15-cv-01366 (EDTX).
`
`Paper 19, 2. The parties state that they have resolved their disputes with
`
`regard to the ’649 patent in that district court litigation and have filed a joint
`
`stipulation of dismissal of all of the parties’ claims and counterclaims that
`
`specifically relate to the ’649 patent. Id. According to the parties, the other
`
`related lawsuits have either being terminated or dismissed. Id. The parties
`
`further indicate that the parties have moved jointly to terminate IPR2017-
`
`00141, IPR2017-00142, IPR2017-00289, and IPR2017-00290, all of which
`
`challenge the patentability of the ’649 patent. Id. at 2–3.
`
`The joint request to treat the settlement agreement as business
`
`confidential information includes a request that the settlement agreement be
`
`kept separate from the patent file. Paper 20; see also 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`
`(“A party to a settlement may request that the settlement be treated as
`
`business confidential information and be kept separate from the files of an
`
`involved patent or application.”).
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00753
`Patent 7,752,649 B1
`
`
`The parties indicate good cause exists to terminate the above-
`
`identified IPR Proceeding. Paper 19, 1. In addition to being unopposed, the
`
`parties state that, although a Patent Owner Response was filed, Petitioner has
`
`not filed its Reply, and the Board has not issued a decision on institution,
`
`plus the co-pending district court litigation has been dismissed with
`
`prejudice. Id. Based on the facts of this case, we agree it is appropriate to
`
`terminate the proceeding, because doing so will preserve the Board’s and the
`
`parties’ resources while also furthering the Patent Office’s policy of
`
`“secur[ing] the just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution”; and this is a just
`
`and fair resolution.
`
`Accordingly, the joint motions to terminate each of the above-
`
`identified proceedings and the joint requests to treat the settlement
`
`agreement as business confidential information are granted. As requested by
`
`the parties, the settlement agreement will be treated as business confidential
`
`information and kept separate from the patent file. 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`This paper does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 318(a).
`
`Therefore, it is
`
`ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2016-00753 is
`
`granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding in IPR2016-00753 is
`
`terminated pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.72, 42.74(c); and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the
`
`settlement agreement (Ex. 1029) be treated as business confidential
`
`information, be kept separate from the file of the involved patent, and made
`
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00753
`Patent 7,752,649 B1
`
`available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any
`
`person on a showing of good cause, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) is granted.
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`5
`
`IPR2016-00753
`Patent 7,752,649 B1
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Marcus Sernel
`msernel@kirkland.com
`
`Joel Merkin
`joel.merkin@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Douglas Kline
`dkline@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Thomas Scott, Jr.
`tscott@pmcip.com
`
`Jennifer Albert
`jalbert@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Stephen Schreiner
`sschreiner@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Krupa Parikh
`kparikh@goodwinprocter.com
`
`April Weisbruch
`aweisbruch@goodwinprocter.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket