`
`AUSTRALIA
`
`PATENTS ACT 1990
`
`PROVISIONAL SPECIFICATION
`
`FOR THE INVENTION ENTITLED:-
`
`"MODULAR PRINTHEAD"
`
`The invention is described in the following statement:-
`
`MJ22
`
`HP 1008
`Page 1 of 15
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`w
`
`The invention relates broadly to printers and in particular to digital inkjet printers.
`
`Traditionally, inkjet printers have used a printing head that traverses back and forth
`
`across the width of a page as it prints. Recently, it has been possible to form printheads
`
`that extend the entire width of the page so that the printhead can remain stationary as the
`
`5 page is moved past it. As pagewidth printheads do not move back and forth across the
`
`page, much higher printing speeds are possible.
`
`Pagewidth printheads are micro-electro-mechanical devices that are manufactured
`
`in a manner similar to silicon computer chips. In this process, the ink nozzles and
`
`ejector mechanisms are formed in a series of etching and deposition procedures on
`
`10
`
`silicon wafers.
`
`As an industry standard, the silicon wafers are produced in 6 or 8 inch diameter
`
`disks. Consequently only a small strip across the diameter of each wafer can be used to
`
`produce printing chips of sufficient width for pagewidth printing. As a large part of
`
`these wafers are essentially wasted, the production costs ofpagewidth printhead chips is
`
`15
`
`relatively high.
`
`The costs are further increased because the chip defect rate is also relatively high.
`
`Faults will inevitably occur during silicon chip manufacture and some level of attrition is
`
`always present. A single fault will render an entire pagewidth chip defective, as is the
`
`case with any silicon chip production. However, because the pagewidth chip is larger
`
`20
`
`than regular chips, there is a higher probability that any particular pagewidth chip will be
`
`defective thereby raising the defect rate as a whole in comparison to regular silicon chip
`
`production.
`
`It is an object of the present invention to overcome or ameliorate at least one of
`
`the disadvantages of the prior art, or to provide a useful alternative.
`
`MJ22
`
`HP 1008
`Page 2 of 15
`
`
`
`- 3-
`
`Accordingly, the present invention provides a modular printhead for a digital
`
`inkjet printer, the modular printhead including:
`
`an elongate support frame; and,
`
`a plurality of printhead modules mounted end to end along the support frame.
`
`5
`
`Preferably, the combined length of the printhead modules is substantially equal
`
`to the width of the pages to be printed.
`
`In a further preferred form, the printhead modules are adapted to be individually
`
`removed and replaced. To achieve this the printhead modules may be conveniently
`
`adapted for snap-locking engagement with the support frame.
`
`1 o
`
`In one particularly preferred form, the printhead modules are mounted to the
`
`support frame such that the printing width of each individual module overlaps with the
`
`printing width adjacent modules.
`
`It will be appreciated that the adjacent positioning of a number of small modular
`
`printheads permits full pagewidth printing while allowing a much higher utilisation of
`
`15
`
`the silicon wafer. Furthermore, the defect rate is effectively lower because a single fault
`
`will mean that a relatively smaller printhead chip will be rejected rather than a large full
`
`pagewidth printhead chip. Accordingly, the production costs per chip are significantly
`
`reduced.
`
`By providing each modular printhead with snap-lock formations, defective
`
`20 modules can be individually removed and replaced if any faults develop during
`
`operation. Furthermore, by providing a small degree of overlap between the printing
`
`widths of the printhead modules, it is possible to ensure that there are no gaps in the
`
`printing produced by the modular printhead as a whole.
`
`MJ22
`
`HP 1008
`Page 3 of 15
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described by way of
`
`example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
`
`Figure 1 is a perspective view showing the underside of a modular printhead
`
`according to the present invention;
`
`5
`
`Figure 2 shows a rear view of the modular printhead at figure 1;
`
`Figure 3 is a plan view of the modular printhead shown in figure 1;
`
`Figure 4 is a front view of the modular printhead shown in figure 1;
`
`Figure 5 is an underneath view of the modular printhead shown in figure 1;
`
`Figure 6 is a left end view of the modular printhead shown in figure 1;
`
`10
`
`Figure 7 is a perspective view of the underside of a modular printhead with several
`
`of the printhead modules removed;
`
`Figure 8 shows an exploded perspective view of a printhead module;
`
`Figure 9 shows an underside view of a printhead module;
`
`Figure 10 shows an end view of a printhead module; and
`
`15
`
`Figure 11 shows a cross-sectional view of the modular printhead shown in figure
`
`1.
`
`Referring to the figures, the modular printhead has a metal chassis (1) which is
`
`fixedly mounted within a digital inkjet printer (not shown). Snap-locked to the metal
`
`chassis (1) are a plurality of replaceable printhead modules (2). The modules (2) are
`
`20
`
`sealed units with four separate ink channels that feed a printhead chip (3). As best seen
`
`in figure 7, each printhead module (2) is plugged into a reservoir molding ( 4) that
`
`supplies ink to the integrally moulded funnels (5).
`
`MJ22
`
`HP 1008
`Page 4 of 15
`
`
`
`- 5-
`
`The ink reservoir (4) may itselfbe a modular c-omponent so the entire modular
`
`printhead is not necessarily limited to the width of a page but may extend to any
`
`arbitrarily chosen width.
`
`Referring to figures 8 to 11, the printhead modules (2) each comprise a printhead
`
`5
`
`chip (3) bonded to a TAB (tape automated bond) film (6) accommodated and supported
`
`by a micromolding (7). This is, in turn, adapted to mate with a cover molding (8). The
`
`printhead chip (3) is a MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical) device. The particular
`
`printhead chips designed by the present Applicant are known as memjetTM chips. The
`
`memjet printhead module has 1600 nozzles per inch for each different colour. As an
`
`10
`
`industry standard, the chips are provided with cyan, magenta, yellow and black (CMYK)
`
`ink. This provides colour printing at an image resolution of 1600 dots per inch (DPI)
`
`which is the accepted standard for photographic image quality. A 21 mm CMYK
`
`memjet chip has 5280 nozzles, each with its own mechanical ink droplet ejection
`
`mechanism.
`
`15
`
`If there is a defect in the chip it usually appears as a line or void in the printing. If
`
`the printhead were to be formed from a single chip then the entire printhead would need
`
`replacement. By modularising the printheads there is less probability that any particular
`
`printhead module will be defective. It will be appreciated that the replacement of single
`
`printhead modules and the greater utilisation of silicon wafers provide a significant
`
`20
`
`saving in production and operating costs.
`
`The TAB film (6) has a slot to accommodate the memjet chip (3) and gold plated
`
`contact pads (9) that connect with the flex PCB (flexible printed circuit board) (10) and
`
`busbar (11) to get data and power respectively to the printhead. The busbars (11) are
`
`MJ22
`
`HP 1008
`Page 5 of 15
`
`
`
`- 6-
`
`thin fingers of metal strip separated by an insulating strip. The busbar sub-assembly (11)
`
`is mounted on the underside of the side wall ink reservoir ( 4).
`
`The flex PCB (10) is mounted to the angled side wall of the reservoir (4). It wraps
`
`beneath the side wall of the reservoir (4) and up the external surface carrying data to the
`
`5 memjet modules (2) via a 62 pin header (12). Side wall of the ink reservoir (4) is angled
`
`to correspond with the side of the cover molding (8) so that when the printhead module
`
`(2) is snap-locked in place, the contacts (9) wipe against the corresponding contacts on
`
`the flex PCB to promote a reliable electrical connection. The angle also assists the easy
`
`removal ofthe modules (2). The flex PCB (11) is "sprung" by the action of a foam
`
`10
`
`backing (13) mounted between the wall and the underside ofthe contact area.
`
`Rib details on the underside of the micromolding (7) provide support for the TAB
`
`film (6) when they are bonded together. The TAB film (6) forms the underside wall of
`
`the printhead module (2) as there is enough structural integrity between the pitch of the
`
`ribs to support a flexible film. The edges of the TAB film (6) are sealed on the
`
`15
`
`underside ofthe walls ofthe cover molding (8). The chip (3) is bonded onto 100 micron
`
`wide ribs that run the length of the micromolding (7) providing the final ink feed into the
`
`memjet print nozzles .
`
`. The design of the micromolding (7) allows for a physical overlap of the memjet
`
`chips (3) when the modules (2) are mounted adjacent one another. Because the.
`
`20
`
`printhead modules (2) form a continuous strip with a generous tolerance, they can be
`
`electronically adjusted to produce a continuous print pattern, rather than relying on very
`
`close tolerance mouldings and exotic materials to perform the same function. According
`
`to this embodiment, the printing chips (3) are 21 mm long but are angled such that they
`
`provide a printing width of20.33 mm.
`
`MJ22
`
`HP 1008
`Page 6 of 15
`
`
`
`-7-
`
`The micromolding (7) fits inside the cover molding (8) where it bonds onto a set of
`
`vertically extending ribs. The cover molding (8) is a two shot precision injection
`
`molding that combines an injected hard plastic body with soft elastomeric sealing collars
`
`at the inlet to each ink chamber defined within the module.
`
`5
`
`Four snap-lock barbs (15) mate with the outer surface of the ink reservoir (4)
`
`which acts as an extension of metal chassis (1). The ink funnels (5) sealingly engage
`
`with the elastomeric collars (14).
`
`The modular design conveniently allows the memjet printhead modules (2) to be
`
`removably snap-locked onto the ink reservoir (4). Accurate alignment of the memjet
`
`10
`
`chip (3) with respect to the metal chassis is not necessary as a complete modular
`
`printhead will undergo digital adjustment of each chip (3) during final quality assurance
`
`testing.
`
`The TAB film ( 6) for each module (2) interfaces with the flex PCB (11) and the
`
`busbars (11) as it is clipped onto the ink reservoir (4). To disengage a memjet printhead
`
`15 module (2) the snap-lock barbs (15) may be configured for release upon the application
`
`of sufficient force by the user. Alternatively, the snap-lock barbs (15) can be configured
`
`for a more positive engagement with the ink reservoir (4) such that a customised tool
`
`(not shown) is required for disengagement of the module.
`
`The invention has been described herein by way of example only and skilled
`
`20 workers in this field will readily recognise many variations and modifications which do
`
`not depart from the spirit and scope of the broad inventive concept.
`
`MJ22
`
`HP 1008
`Page 7 of 15
`
`
`
`- 8-
`
`THE CLAIMS DEFINING THE INVENTION ARE AS FOLLOWS:-
`
`1.
`
`A modular printhead for a digital ink:jet printer, a modular printhead including:
`
`a support frame; and,
`
`a plurality ofprinthead modules mounted adjacent each other on the support frame.
`
`5
`
`2.
`
`A modular printhead according to claim 1 wherein the combined length of the
`
`printhead modules is substantially equal to the width of the pages to be printed.
`
`3.
`
`A modular printhead according to claim 2 wherein the printhead modules are
`
`adapted to be individually removed and replaced.
`
`4.
`
`A modular printhead according to claim 3 wherein the printhead modules are
`
`10
`
`adapted for snap-locking engagement with the support frame.
`
`5.
`
`A modular printhead according to claim 4 wherein the printhead modules are
`
`mounted to the support frame such that the printing width of each individual module
`
`overlaps with the printing width of adjacent modules.
`
`6.
`
`A modular printhead for a digital inkjet printer substantially as herein before
`
`15
`
`described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
`
`DATED this 2nd day of March, 2000
`
`SIL VERBROOK RESEARCH PTY LTD
`
`Attorney: JOHN D. FORSTER
`Fellow Institute of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys of Australia
`of BALDWIN SHELSTON WATERS
`
`20
`
`MJ22
`
`HP 1008
`Page 8 of 15
`
`
`
`117
`
`HP 1008
`Page 9 of 15
`
`
`
`217
`
`- .
`
`I ®
`
`I
`
`®
`
`®
`
`®
`
`-r
`
`J 1
`r
`J 1
`r
`
`~ j _j
`r
`J 1 r
`- J .1
`• 1
`
`,--
`
`I..,.;
`
`J_J
`I
`
`j_J
`
`J 1
`I
`
`.., u
`
`HP 1008
`Page 10 of 15
`
`
`
`317
`317317
`
`- ~ .
`~
`\L
`
`HP 1008
`Page 11 of 15
`
`
`
`4/7
`4/7
`
`FIG. 8
`
`HP 1008
`
`Page 12 of 15
`
`HP 1008
`Page 12 of 15
`
`
`
`5/7
`
`3
`
`-
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I I
`
`I u I
`
`FJG. 9
`
`I~ \ 1--
`
`I
`
`6
`
`8
`
`HP 1008
`Page 13 of 15
`
`
`
`6/7
`
`HP 1008
`Page 14 of 15
`
`
`
`7/7
`
`«
`
`__-
`
`/%>._m/_
`
`“ii
`
`_.
`
`HP 1008
`Page 15 of 15