throbber
THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
`© 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
`
`Vol. 273, No. 51, Issue of December 18, pp. 34568–34574, 1998
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Purification of the Lysosomal Sialic Acid Transporter
`FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A MONOCARBOXYLATE TRANSPORTER*
`
`(Received for publication, March 31, 1998, and in revised form, September 23, 1998)
`
`Adrie C. Havelaar, Grazia M. S. Mancini, Cecile E. M. T. Beerens, Ragonda M. A. Souren,
`and Frans W. Verheijen‡
`From the Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University, P. O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 5, 2015
`
`monosaccharides sialic acid (Neu5Ac)1, uronic acids, and al-
`donic acids (3). Subsequent studies in our laboratory showed
`that a defective transport of sialic and glucuronic acid (GlcA) is
`the primary defect in both clinical variants (4), Salla disease
`and infantile sialic acid storage disease. Recently, the gene for
`these disorders has been localized to the same refined chromo-
`somal area on 6q14-q15 by linkage disequilibrium analysis (5).
`However, the disease gene has not been identified yet. The
`elucidation of the molecular structure and functional proper-
`ties of the lysosomal sialic acid transporter is indispensable for
`further understanding of the molecular defect(s) in the clinical
`heterogeneous forms of sialic acid storage diseases. Previously,
`we have developed a functional reconstitution system for the
`sialic acid transporter that provided the tool to start the puri-
`fication and functional characterization of the transport
`protein (6).
`In this paper we present the purification of the sialic acid
`transporter from lysosomal membranes of rat liver to apparent
`homogeneity. Its functional properties are compared with those
`of other monocarboxylate transporters present in the plasma
`membrane of various mammalian cells (7–9).
`
`EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
`Materials
`Highly purified lysosomal membrane vesicles were isolated from
`livers of adult Wistar rats (3). The lysosomal membrane vesicles were
`suspended at a protein concentration of 8–10 mg/ml in 20 mM NaHepes,
`pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA and were stored at 270 °C. All chemicals used were
`obtained from Sigma or as indicated. L-Iduronic acid, sodium salt was
`obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals Inc. (North York, ON, Can-
`ada). All the tested carboxylates were titrated with NaOH before use.
`
`Reconstitution
`Reconstitution of the protein eluates into liposomes was performed
`as described earlier (6), with the following modification: proteolipo-
`somes were formed by incubating the protein sample, containing deter-
`gent and phospholipid (total volume, 170 ml), with 150 ml of Amberlite
`XAD-2 beads (Fluka) in 20 mM NaHepes, pH 7.4, 100 mM KCl. After 30
`min of rotation at room temperature, beads were removed by short
`centrifugation, and proteoliposomes were used for transport assays.
`
`Transport Assay
`After reconstitution, the carrier activity was assayed by uptake of
`radiolabeled GlcA in the presence of an inwardly directed proton gra-
`dient. Because Neu5Ac and GlcA are transported by the same lysosomal
`transporter for acidic monosaccharides (3, 4), we have performed all
`studies using radiolabeled GlcA, which was more readily available.
`Aliquots of proteoliposomes (25 ml) were incubated at 37 °C with 5 ml of
`240 mM Mes (free acid) containing 2 mCi of D-[1-3H]GlcA (Amersham
`Pharmacia Biotech; specific activity, 6.6 Ci/mmol), resulting in an ex-
`travesicular pH of 5.5 and a final concentration of 10 mM GlcA. Blank
`
`1 The abbreviations used are: Neu5Ac, N-acetylneuraminic acid;
`GlcA, glucuronic acid; Mes, 2-(N-morpholino)-ethanesulfonic acid; IdoA,
`iduronic acid; DIDS, 4,49-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,29-disulfonic acid;
`PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
`34568
`
`This paper is available on line at http://www.jbc.org
`
`Sialic acid and glucuronic acid are monocarboxylated
`monosaccharides, which are normally present in sugar
`side chains of glycoproteins, glycolipids, and glycosami-
`noglycans. After degradation of these compounds in ly-
`sosomes, the free monosaccharides are released from
`the lysosome by a specific membrane transport system.
`This transport system is deficient in the human heredi-
`tary lysosomal sialic acid storage diseases (Salla disease
`and infantile sialic acid storage disease, OMIM 269920).
`The lysosomal sialic acid transporter from rat liver has
`now been purified to apparent homogeneity in a recon-
`stitutively active form by a combination of hydroxyap-
`atite, lectin, and ion exchange chromatography. A 57-
`kDa protein correlated with transport activity. The
`transporter recognized structurally different types of
`acidic monosaccharides,
`like sialic acid, glucuronic
`acid, and iduronic acid. Transport of glucuronic acid
`was inhibited by a number of aliphatic monocarboxy-
`lates (i.e. lactate, pyruvate, and valproate), substituted
`monocarboxylates, and several dicarboxylates. cis-Inhi-
`bition, trans-stimulation, and competitive inhibition ex-
`periments with radiolabeled glucuronic acid as well as
`radiolabeled L-lactate demonstrated that L-lactate is
`transported by the lysosomal sialic acid transporter.
`L-Lactate transport was proton gradient-dependent, sat-
`urable with a Km of 0.4 mM, and mediated by a single
`mechanism. These data show striking biochemical and
`structural similarities of the lysosomal sialic acid trans-
`porter with the known monocarboxylate transporters of
`the plasma membrane (MCT1, MCT2, MCT3, and Mev).
`
`The major function of lysosomes is the degradation of a large
`variety of intra- and extracellular macromolecules. The release
`of degradation products from the lysosome is accomplished by
`specific membrane transport systems. More than 20 lysosomal
`transporters have been characterized for specific solutes like
`amino acids, sugars, nucleosides, ions, and vitamins (1). Their
`fundamental role in biology is illustrated by the occurrence of
`two human inherited diseases with a defective lysosomal trans-
`port function, cystinosis and sialic acid storage diseases (2).
`Sialic acid storage diseases are autosomal recessive disorders
`that are characterized by mental retardation and a variable
`degree of neurodegeneration. Lysosomal accumulation and ex-
`cessive urinary excretion of free sialic acid are pathognomonic
`findings. Previously, we have characterized a carrier in the
`lysosomal membrane with substrate specificity for the acidic
`
`* This work was supported in part by the Dutch Organization for
`Scientific Research (NWO). The costs of publication of this article were
`defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must
`therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18
`U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`‡ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 31-10-4087350;
`Fax: 31-10-4362536; E-mail: verheijen@ikg.fgg.eur.nl.
`
`Ranbaxy Ex. 1039
`IPR Petition - USP 9,050,302
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 5, 2015
`
`Purification of the Lysosomal Sialic Acid Transporter
`
`34569
`
`values were determined by incubation of proteoliposomes at 37 °C with
`40 mM Mes (free acid), 7 mM unlabeled NaGlcA, pH 5.5, and 2 mCi of
`D-[1-3H]GlcA and subtracted from all determinations. Previous experi-
`ments showed that uptake rates are linear up to 1 min. After 1 min, the
`reactions were stopped by diluting the sample with 70 ml of ice-cold
`incubation buffer (17 mM NaHepes, 84 mM KCl, 40 mM Mes (free acid),
`pH 5.5). The samples were immediately applied to a Sephadex G50 fine
`(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) column (Pasteur pipettes, 0.5 3 5cm)
`at 4 °C. Columns were equilibrated in cold incubation buffer, and ves-
`icles were eluted with 1 ml of cold incubation buffer. Vesicle-associated
`radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting in 10 ml of
`Insta-gel (Packard).
`cis-Inhibition experiments were performed by incubating the proteo-
`liposomes for 1 min at 37 °C with 2 mCi of [3H]GlcA (final concentration,
`10 mM) in 40 mM Mes (free acid), resulting in an inwardly directed
`proton gradient (pHin 5 7.4 . pHout 5 5.5), and 7 mM of the tested
`compound.
`For trans-stimulation studies, a 60% proteoliposome solution (25 ml)
`was pre-incubated for 60 min at 37 °C with 17 mM NaHepes, 84 mM
`KCl, 40 mM Mes acid, pH 5.5, plus 10 mM monensin, 10 mM valinomycin
`(Boehringer Mannheim) in the presence or absence of 1 mM unlabeled
`substrate. The assay was started by adding 75 ml of an equivalent buffer
`containing 2 mCi of [3H]GlcA at 37 °C with a final concentration of 0.25
`mM. When the samples were pre-incubated without unlabeled sub-
`strate, the external final concentration was corrected as in the case of
`preloading (0.25 mM unlabeled compound). After 1 min, the reaction
`was stopped as described (6).
`The experiments with [14C]L-lactate (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech;
`specific activity, 152 mCi/mmol) were largely performed as described for
`[3H]GlcA. However, incubation mixtures contained 0.066 mCi of [14C]L-
`lactate (final concentration, 15 mM) and were performed at 20 °C instead
`of 37 °C. Blank values were determined by incubation of proteolipo-
`somes with 40 mM Mes (free acid), 7 mM unlabeled sodium L-lactate and
`subtracted from all determinations. For protein side chain modification,
`proteoliposomes (100 ml) were incubated and treated as described (6).
`
`Purification of the Rat Liver Lysosomal Membrane
`Sialic Acid Transport Protein
`For a single purification, lysosomal membrane vesicles prepared
`from 150 g of rat livers (15 rats) were used.
`Step 1: Solubilization—Solubilization of lysosomal membrane pro-
`teins was performed by mixing the lysosomal membrane vesicles 1:1
`(v/v) with 1% Triton X-100 (especially purified for membrane research,
`Boehringer Mannheim), 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. After 25 min of incu-
`bation at 0 °C, unextracted material was pelleted by ultracentrifugation
`at 150,000 3 g in a Beckman SW 40 rotor for 20 min at 4 °C.
`Step 2: Hydroxyapatite—The Triton X-100 extract was applied to
`hydroxyapatite columns (Pasteur pipettes containing 0.5 g of dry ma-
`terial, Biogel HTP, Bio-Rad, packed by 15 s of tapping) at 4 °C, with a
`maximum of 500 ml solubilized material/column. Each column was
`washed with 3 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.1% Triton X-100 (buffer
`A). Elution was with 3 ml of buffer A, 25 mM Na2HPO4, NaH2PO4, pH
`7.4. After pooling all the 3-ml eluates, a 2-ml sample was concentrated
`in a Centricon 10 device (Amicon, Inc., Beverly, MA) until 100–150 ml
`and desalted. A 50-ml aliquot was used for the reconstitution assay and
`a 20-ml aliquot was used for the protein assay. Desalting was performed
`on a 2-ml Sephadex G50 medium (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) col-
`umn equilibrated in buffer A (10).
`Step 3: Lentil Lectin—The eluates of the different hydroxyapatite
`columns were pooled and applied to a 2-ml lentil lectin affinity chro-
`matography column (lentil lectin-Sepharose 4B, Amersham Pharmacia
`Biotech) pre-equilibrated in buffer A. After washing the lentil lectin
`column with 2 ml of buffer A, the flow-through fraction (unretained
`material) was applied to a 2-ml DEAE-Sephacel (Amersham Pharmacia
`Biotech) anion exchanger pre-equilibrated in buffer A containing 10%
`glycerol (buffer B). A 2-ml sample of the lentil lectin flow-through
`fraction was concentrated in a Centricon 10 device to 100–150 ml and
`desalted (10). A 50-ml aliquot was used for the reconstitution assay, and
`a 20-ml aliquot was used for the protein assay.
`Step 4: DEAE-Sephacel—After extensive washing the DEAE-Sepha-
`cel column with 20 ml of buffer B and 20 ml of buffer B with 40 mM
`NaCl, bound material was eluted with 6 ml of buffer B with 100 mM
`NaCl. This fraction was stored at 270 °C.
`Step 5: Hydroxyapatite—After the DEAE-eluate was thawed, a 0.5
`ml sample was concentrated in a Centricon 10 device until 100 ml and
`desalted (10). A 50 ml aliquot was used for the reconstitution assay and
`a 20 ml aliquot for the protein assay. The 100 mM NaCl DEAE-eluate
`
`(5.5 ml) was adjusted to pH 6.0 with 0.5 M Mes (free acid) and applied
`to a prepacked hydroxyapatite column (1-ml EconoPac HTP cartridge,
`Bio-Rad) pre-equilibrated in 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM NaMes pH 6.0, 0.1%
`Triton X-100. Transport activity was eluted with 6 ml of 1 mM
`Na2HPO4, NaH2PO4, pH 6.0, 300 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100. This
`eluate was concentrated in Millipore ultrafree-15 centrifugal filters 10K
`(Millipore Corporation, Bedford) to approximately 300 ml and desalted
`(10). A 50-ml aliquot was used for the reconstitution assay, and a 100-ml
`aliquot was used for the protein assay.
`Step 6: Mono Q—The concentrated hydroxyapatite eluate (150 ml)
`was applied to a 0.10-ml Mono Q anion exchange column attached to a
`Amersham Pharmacia Biotech SMART system. This column was equil-
`ibrated in buffer B, and bound material was eluted with a linear
`gradient of 0–210 mM NaCl in buffer B. Fractions of 0.1 ml were
`collected and pooled pairwise, buffer was exchanged for 20 mM Na-
`Hepes, 100 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton X-100 by the desalting procedure as
`described above, and a 50-ml aliquot was used for the reconstitution
`assay. All column procedures were performed at 4 °C.
`
`Protein Characterization and Determination
`The purity of the various active fractions was determined by SDS-
`polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis according to Laemmli (11) of meth-
`anol/chloroform precipitated samples (12), followed by Coomassie Bril-
`liant Blue R-250 or the silver nitrate staining according to Amersham
`Pharmacia Biotech. Protein concentration was determined by the pro-
`cedure of Lowry et al. as modified by Peterson (13) for the presence of
`Triton. Protein concentrations in eluates of the second hydroxyapatite
`column were determined after methanol/chloroform precipitation (12).
`Protein concentrations in Mono Q eluates were too low to be determined
`by the above assay and were therefore estimated from silver-stained
`SDS-PAGE gels.
`For the endoglycosidase F/N-Glycosidase F (Boehringer Mannheim)
`treatment of the purified protein, the Mono Q fractions 19–23 were
`pooled, concentrated, and incubated with 25 milliunits endoglycosidase
`F, 100 ml in the presence of 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4,
`50 mM EDTA, 2% Triton X-100, 0.2% SDS, 2% b-mercaptoethanol for
`2 h at 37 °C. Proteins were precipitated with methanol/chloroform (12).
`The pellet was resuspended in sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-
`PAGE (10% gel).
`
`RESULTS
`Purification of the Lysosomal Sialic Acid Transporter—Var-
`ious membrane (transport) proteins have been successfully pu-
`rified using hydroxyapatite as well as ion exchange chromatog-
`raphy in the presence of detergents (14–18). In addition,
`affinity chromatography with oligosaccharide-specific lectins
`has been used to identify the major heavily glycosylated lyso-
`somal membrane proteins: LAMPs (lysosomal-associated mem-
`brane proteins) and LIMPs (lysosomal integral membrane pro-
`teins) (19–22). Based on the success of these purification
`methods for membrane proteins we developed a purification
`protocol for the lysosomal sialic acid transporter. Previously,
`we have reported a successful reconstitution procedure for the
`rat liver lysosomal sialic acid transporter that now provided
`the functional assay to follow fractionation and purification of
`the solubilized transporter (6). At all steps of the purification
`procedure, samples were collected and reconstituted into pro-
`teoliposomes, and their transport activities were measured us-
`ing radiolabeled GlcA as a substrate (Table I).
`The Triton X-100 solubilized lysosomal membrane proteins
`were applied to small columns of dry hydroxyapatite material.
`The columns were washed with equilibration buffer at pH 7.4,
`and about 20% of the transport activity was eluted with 25 mM
`sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.4. This resulted in a 4-fold
`purification. The next step consisted of lentil lectin affinity
`chromatography. Almost all activity of the sialic acid trans-
`porter was recovered from the column flow-through. Lentil
`lectin recognizes a-D-glucose and a-D-mannose residues and
`therefore binds glycoproteins. Consequently, a number of ma-
`jor lysosomal membrane glycoproteins bound to the column
`and thus could be separated from the protein preparation con-
`taining transport activity. This step was kept in our protocol
`
`

`
`34570
`
`Purification of the Lysosomal Sialic Acid Transporter
`
`TABLE I
`Purification of the sialic acid transporter from rat liver lysosomal membrane vesicles
`Lysosomal membrane vesicles (approximately 25 mg of protein) derived from 150 g of rat livers were used as starting material. The purification
`procedure, reconstitution, and transport assay were performed as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Activity is expressed as uptake of
`[3H]GlcA in 1 min at 37 °C. Data represent the means of three separate isolations.
`
`Fraction
`
`Protein
`
`Total protein
`
`Total Activity
`
`Yield
`
`Specific activity
`
`Solubilized lysosomal
`membrane extract
`First hydroxyapatite eluate
`Lentil lectin eluate
`DEAE eluate
`Second hydroxyapatite
`eluate
`Mono Q eluate
`
`mg/ml
`200
`
`16.4
`13.6
`16.6
`0.5
`
`0.14
`
`mg
`12000
`
`591
`489
`99.5
`3.0
`
`0.028
`
`pmol/min
`2102.4
`
`441.5
`378.4
`252.3
`42.1
`
`2.1
`
`%
`100
`
`21
`18
`12
`2
`
`0.1
`
`pmol GlcA/mg/min
`175.2
`
`747.3
`774.4
`2534.9
`14171.4
`
`75757.6
`
`Fold
`enhancement
`
`1
`
`4
`4.4
`14.5
`80
`
`432
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 5, 2015
`
`FIG. 1. SDS-PAGE of protein fractions during the initial steps
`of the purification of the functional lysosomal sialic acid trans-
`porter from rat liver. Protein fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
`(10% gel) and Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 stained. Per lane, an
`aliquot of approximately 30 mg of total protein was loaded. Lane 1,
`mid-range protein molecular weight markers (Promega). Lane 2, rat
`liver lysosomal membrane vesicles. Lane 3, Triton X-100-solubilized
`lysosomal membrane vesicles. Lane 4, 25 mM sodium phosphate eluate
`of first hydroxyapatite column. Lane 5, lentil lectin unretained fraction.
`Lane 6, 100 mM NaCl eluate of DEAE-Sephacel column.
`
`ture endoglycosidase F/N-glycosidase F. After treatment, the
`apparent molecular mass of the 57-kDa protein was not de-
`creased. The apparent molecular mass of a control glycoprotein
`was decreased as a result of cleavage of glycosydic chains (data
`not shown). This, together with the observation that this pro-
`tein did not interact with lentil lectin, indicates that the carrier
`is apparently not glycosylated. Analysis by SDS-PAGE in the
`presence or absence of the thiol-reducing agent 2-mercaptoeth-
`anol did not show any alteration of the electrophoretic behavior
`of the purified transport protein (data not shown). This indi-
`cates that the transporter is not functional as a (homo)dimer or
`polymer linked by disulfide bridges.
`Substrate Specificity of the Lysosomal Sialic Acid Transport-
`er—Because the final yield of the highly purified sialic acid
`transporter was very low, detailed kinetic studies were difficult
`to perform. Therefore, most kinetic characterization of the ly-
`sosomal sialic acid transporter was performed using partially
`purified preparations (DEAE-Sephacel eluates). Subsequently,
`some key experiments were repeated in a concise manner with
`the highly purified transport preparation.
`Interaction of the Lysosomal Sialic Acid Transporter with
`Iduronic Acid—In earlier substrate specificity studies with the
`crude lysosomal sialic acid transporter, we have shown that
`this transporter recognizes structurally different types of acidic
`monosaccharides (i.e. the sialic acid Neu5Ac and the uronic
`acid GlcA) (3, 4). The uronic acid iduronate (IdoA) represents,
`
`despite the fact that it did not lead to an increase in specific
`activity.
`The lentil lectin flow-through fraction was applied to a
`DEAE-Sephacel anion exchange column. With 100 mM NaCl,
`12% of the total transport activity was eluted. As depicted in
`Table I, this resulted in a ’14.5-fold increase in specific activ-
`ity over the starting material. Analysis of the protein composi-
`tion of fractions obtained from these initial purification steps is
`shown in Fig. 1. Many different protein bands were still
`present.
`The next purification step consisted of chromatography on
`hydroxyapatite. This time the column was pre-equilibrated at
`pH 6.0 in the presence of 300 mM NaCl. Under these conditions,
`acidic proteins are retained and are eluted with low phosphate
`buffers. This step provided an important purification of the
`sialic acid transport protein with an 80-fold enrichment in
`specific activity (Table I). SDS-PAGE protein analysis using
`silver staining showed at least four distinct protein bands (Fig.
`2A). One of these proteins has a molecular mass of 85 kDa and
`based on its N-terminal amino acid sequence represented one
`of the major lysosomal membrane glycoproteins, the Lgp85 or
`LIMP II (23). Another major 67-kDa protein represented the
`lysosomal membrane-bound subunit of acid phosphatase (24).
`The other proteins were considered as candidates for the lyso-
`somal sialic acid transporter.
`The next purification step consisted of a strong anion ex-
`change Mono Q column attached to the SMART system of
`Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Retained proteins were eluted
`with a gradient of 0–210 mM NaCl. SDS-PAGE analysis by
`silver nitrate staining of the eluted proteins showed a predom-
`inant protein band with a molecular mass of ’57 kDa in the
`fractions 20/21 in which also the highest GlcA transport activ-
`ity was observed (Fig. 2B). In addition, quantitative image
`analysis of the SDS-PAGE protein elution pattern from the
`Mono Q column demonstrated a correlation between the 57-
`kDa protein and the transport activity (data not shown). All
`other visualized proteins could not represent the sialic acid
`transporter, because they became more prevalent in following
`fractions, where lower or no transport activity was detected
`(Fig. 2B).
`In the final protein preparations (fractions 20–21 from the
`Mono Q column) transport activity was 432-fold enriched over
`the activity in the initial lysosomal membrane extract (Table I).
`Considering that the lysosomal membrane marker b-glucosi-
`dase is about 100-fold enriched in the lysosomal membrane
`vesicles (used as a starting material), the sialic acid transport
`protein is about 40,000-fold purified in the final eluate of the
`Mono Q column.
`Properties of the Purified Lysosomal Sialic Acid Transport-
`er—To investigate the glycosylation of the transporter, the
`final protein preparation was incubated with the enzyme mix-
`
`

`
`Purification of the Lysosomal Sialic Acid Transporter
`
`34571
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 5, 2015
`
`TABLE II
`cis-Inhibition and trans-stimulation of [3H]GlcA uptake by mono-,
`di-, or tricarboxylic acids
`The partially purified (DEAE-Sephacel eluate) sialic acid transporter
`was reconstituted, and proteoliposomes were incubated 1 min at 37 °C
`with 10 mM [3H]GlcA in the presence of an inwardly directed proton
`gradient and 7 mM of the indicated compounds. Data represent the
`means of four independent determinations 6 S.D. In trans-stimulation
`experiments partially purified proteoliposomes were preincubated for
`60 min at 37 °C in the presence or absence of 1 mM unlabeled GlcA,
`IdoA, L-lactate, mevalonate, or succinate in 20 mM NaHepes, 100 mM
`KCl, 40 mM Mes, pH 5.5, 10 mM valinomycin and monensin. The trans-
`port assay was started by a 4-fold dilution in pH 5.5 incubation buffer
`with 2 mCi of [3H]GlcA and allowed to proceed for 1 min. In the samples
`that were preincubated without unlabeled compound, 0.25 mM unla-
`beled compound was added together with radiolabeled substrate to give
`the same extravesicular substrate concentration in both experiments.
`
`Transport activity
`
`trans-Stimulation
`
`pmol/mg/min % of control
`
`% of not trans-
`stimulated
`
`Control
`Acidic monosaccharides
`GlcA
`Neu5Ac
`IdoA
`Monocarboxylates
`Oxamate
`Pyruvate
`L-Lactate
`4-OH-butyrate
`Mevalonate
`Valproate
`Dicarboxylates
`Succinate
`Malate
`Malonate
`Maleate
`Fumarate
`a-Ketoglutarate
`Glutamate
`Tricarboxylate
`Citrate
`
`2280.5 6 132.6
`
`0
`0
`916.1 6 272.4
`
`553.0 6 45.5
`534.6 6 46.0
`195.6 6 67.8
`369.4 6 107.2
`510.0 6 24.0
`0
`
`0
`366.0 6 21.8
`685.3 6 37.5
`592.5 6 79.5
`234.3 6 81.0
`1090.2 6 199.6
`2437.8 6 195.4
`
`1665.9 6 30.6
`
`0
`0
`40
`
`24
`24
`8
`16
`22
`0
`
`0
`16
`30
`26
`10
`48
`107
`
`73
`
`200
`
`180
`
`150
`
`109
`
`79
`
`FIG. 3. Proton gradient-dependent uptake of [14C]L-lactate.
`Proteoliposomes of DEAE-Sephacel eluate prepared in 20 mM NaHepes,
`100 mM KCl, pH 7.4, were incubated with 15 mM [14C]L-lactate at 20 °C
`in 40 mM Mes (free acid), 10 mM valinomycin, pH 5.5 (with proton
`gradient, pHin 5 7.4 . pHout 5 5.5, l) or in 20 mM NaHepes, 10 mM
`valinomycin, pH 7.4 (no proton gradient, pHin 5 pHout 5 7.4, E).
`
`diolabeled [14C]L-lactate. The presence of an inwardly directed
`proton gradient (pHin 5 7.4 . pHout 5 5.5) stimulated initial
`uptake rates of lactate above equilibrium level (Fig. 3). At the
`top of overshoot, approximately 2% of external lactate was
`taken up inside the vesicles. This overshoot phenomenon was
`abolished in the absence of a proton gradient (pHin 5 pHout 5
`7.4), indicating that the transport of lactate is proton gradient-
`driven, similarly to the transport of the acidic monosaccharides
`Neu5Ac and GlcA. In these experiments, the use of low concen-
`
`FIG. 2. A 57-kDa protein correlates with the transport activity.
`Panel A shows the SDS-PAGE protein pattern of the preparation, which
`was applied to the Mono Q column. Panel B, bottom, elution profile of
`Mono Q column. Transport activity was measured in reconstituted
`proteoliposomes of the respective Mono Q fractions. Proteoliposomes
`(25 ml) were incubated 1 min at 37 °C with 10 mM [3H]GlcA in the
`presence of an inwardly directed proton gradient. Transport activity is
`expressed as pmol [3H]GlcA/min/25 ml. Top, SDS-PAGE and silver
`staining of corresponding Mono Q fractions.
`
`like GlcA, a major component of glycosaminoglycans. These are
`degraded in lysosomes, and thus free IdoA is like GlcA expected
`to be transported across the lysosomal membrane. The recent
`commercial availability of free IdoA made it now possible to
`investigate by cis-inhibition and trans-stimulation studies
`whether this uronic acid is also a substrate for the lysosomal
`sialic acid transporter (Table II). IdoA inhibited [3H]GlcA up-
`take, although less efficiently than Neu5Ac and GlcA. Further-
`more, IdoA was able to induce, like its isomer GlcA, almost a
`2-fold trans-stimulation (Table II). These experiments indicate
`that IdoA is indeed a substrate for the sialic acid transporter.
`Interaction of the Lysosomal Sialic Acid Transporter with
`Small Monocarboxylates—We investigated the interaction of
`the transport protein with other known substrates for organic
`anion carriers. Initially, mono-, di-, and tricarboxylic acids
`were tested for their cis-inhibition effect on the initial linear
`rate of proton-driven [3H]GlcA uptake in a partially purified
`preparation (Table II). Most of these organic anions are known
`substrates for the proton-driven monocarboxylate transporters
`MCT1, MCT2, and MCT3 of the plasma membrane and for the
`pyruvate and the dicarboxylate transporters of the outer mito-
`chondrial membrane. The monocarboxylic and dicarboxylic ac-
`ids were all strong inhibitors, except for the amino acid gluta-
`mate and the Krebs cycle intermediate a-ketoglutarate.
`L-Lactate and the anti-epileptic drug valproic acid (dipropyl
`acetate), among the monocarboxylates, and succinate, among
`the dicarboxylates, were the strongest inhibitors (Table II). The
`tricarboxylate citrate showed no significant inhibition. To test
`whether inhibition represents interaction at the substrate
`binding site and consequently transport, we investigated the
`trans-stimulation effect of some representative mono- and di-
`carboxylate inhibitors on the uptake of [3H]GlcA. Partially
`purified protein preparations were reconstituted in proteolipo-
`somes and preloaded with an unlabeled compound at concen-
`trations of 1 mM, just above the Km of GlcA (0.4 mM) (6), and the
`uptake of [3H]GlcA was followed for 1 min. As shown in Table
`II, L-lactate as well as GlcA itself trans-stimulated the uptake
`of [3H]GlcA. Mevalonate and succinate did not cause trans-
`stimulation. Next, we investigated transport kinetics of L-lac-
`tate by the partially purified sialic acid transporter using ra-
`
`

`
`34572
`
`Purification of the Lysosomal Sialic Acid Transporter
`
`FIG. 4. Competitive inhibition of
`[3H]GlcA transport by L-lactate and
`of [14C]L-lactate transport by Neu5Ac.
`Initial proton-dependent transport rates
`of [3H]GlcA (1 min, 37 °C) and [14C]L-lac-
`tate (30 s, 20 °C) were measured in pro-
`teoliposomes of DEAE-Sephacel eluates.
`The uptake medium contained increasing
`concentrations of
`the respective sub-
`strates in the presence or absence of the
`inhibitors L-lactate or Neu5Ac. Data were
`plotted double reciprocally. A, [3H]GlcA
`uptake with (E) or without (l) cold 2 mM
`L-lactate. B, [14C]L-lactate uptake with
`(E) or without (l) cold 7 mM Neu5Ac.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on October 5, 2015
`
`trations of lactate (15 mM), lower temperature (20 °C), and the
`use of a pH far above the pK for the tested compounds limit the
`contribution of aspecific diffusion on the net uptake. Proton-
`driven [14C]L-lactate transport under apparent zero-trans con-
`ditions was saturable with a Km of approximately 0.4 mM and
`a Vmax of 500 nmol/30 s/mg protein. An Eadie-Hofstee plot of
`the kinetic data indicated a linear process, suggesting that only
`one type of transport system operates (data not shown).
`Although these studies provide evidence that the partially
`purified protein preparation is able to transport, in addition to
`acidic monosaccharides, many other small monocarboxylic ac-
`ids, it cannot be excluded that other proteins in this prepara-
`tion are present. However, the exchange of GlcA with L-lactate
`in the trans-stimulation experiments is strong evidence for
`transport of both compounds by the same protein. To provide
`further evidence that lactate and GlcA can be transported by
`the same carrier in the lysosomal membrane, competitive in-
`hibition experiments were performed. Proton-dependent trans-
`port of [3H]GlcA or [14C]L-lactate was measured in voltage
`clamped membranes with K1/valinomycin in the absence or
`presence of cold L-lactate or cold Neu5Ac as inhibitors, respec-
`tively. The results were fitted to a double reciprocal plot, show-
`ing a clear mode of competitive inhibition of lactate (calculated
`Ki of 2.5 mM) on GlcA transport and of Neu5Ac (calculated Ki of
`2 mM) on L-lactate transport (Fig. 4). Definite evidence that
`transport of lactate is performed by the lysosomal sialic acid
`transporter was obtained from cis-inhibition and concentration-
`dependent inhibition studies with the highly purified sialic acid
`transporter preparation. Proton-driven [3H]GlcA transport un-
`der apparent zero-trans conditions was completely inhibited in
`the presence of 7 mM unlabeled GlcA or Neu5Ac or L-lactate
`(Table III). Proton-driven [14C]L-lactate transport under appar-
`ent zero-trans conditions was inhibited totally by L-lactate and
`significantly by Neu5Ac. It is interesting to note that under
`these conditions GlcA did not inhibit. Because the GlcA trans-
`port assays are performed at 37 °C and the lactate transport
`assays at 20 °C, these apparent inconsistencies can be ex-
`plained by differences in affinities at different temperatures.
`Inhibition of [3H]GlcA transport by L-lactate was a clear con-
`centration-dependent process (Table III). Clearly, the highly
`purified transporter preparation contains a transporter that
`carries all three substrates, GlcA, Neu5Ac, and L-lactate (see
`also the above competitive inhibition experiments).
`Sensitivity to Covalent Protein Modifiers—In previous exper-
`iments studying the effect of protein modifiers on GlcA trans-
`port in native lysosomal membrane vesicles and reconstituted
`proteoliposomes, we have demonstrated the involvement of
`arginines (and possibly histidines) in substrate recognition (3,
`
`TABLE III
`cis-Inhibition of [3H]GlcA and [14C]L-lactate uptake by GlcA, Neu5Ac,
`and L-lactate in proteoliposomes of the highly purified lysosomal sialic
`acid transporter
`In the upper part of the table, the Mono Q eluate was reconstituted,
`and proteoliposomes were either incubated 1 min at 37 °C in the case of
`[3H]GlcA assay or 30 s at 20 °C in the case of [rosup;14C]L-lactate assay,
`both in the presence of an inwardly directed proton gradient and with
`7 mM of the indicated compounds. In the lower part of the table,
`proteoliposomes of the highly purified sialic acid transporter were in-
`cubated with 10 mM [3H]GlcA for 1 min at 37 °C in the presence of an
`inward directed proton gradient (pHin 5 7.4, pHout 5 5.5) and with
`v

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket