throbber
Case 6:14-cv-00678 Document 1 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`Case No. 6:14-cv-678
`
`Jury Trial
`
`TracBeam, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`T-Mobile US, Inc., and
`T-Mobile USA, Inc.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam, LLC files suit against Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile
`
`
`
`
`
`USA, Inc. and alleges the following on information and belief.
`
`
`
`
`
`Introduction
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam owns the inventions described and claimed in the following
`
`United States Patents:
`
`• US Patent No. 8,032,153, entitled “Multiple Location Estimators
`for Wireless Location” (the ‘153 patent);
`
`
`
`• US Patent No. 7,764,231, entitled “Wireless Location Using Multiple
`Mobile Station Location Techniques” (the ‘231 patent);
`
`• US Patent No. 7,525,484, entitled “Gateway and Hybrid Solutions
`for Wireless Location” (the ‘484 patent); and
`
`• US Patent No. 7,298,327, entitled “Geographic Location Using
`Multiple Location Estimators” (the ‘327 patent).
`
`
`
`2.
`
`Defendants have used and continue to use Plaintiff’s patented technology in
`
`products and services that they make, use, import, sell, and offer to sell. TracBeam seeks
`
`damages for patent infringement and an injunction preventing Defendants from making, using,
`
`selling, or offering to sell products and services claimed by the asserted patents without
`
`Plaintiff’s permission.
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`Exhibit 2003
`T-Mobile et al. v. TracBeam, LLC
`IPR2016-00728
`
`

`
`Case 6:14-cv-00678 Document 1 Filed 08/08/14 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam is an inventor-owned company that has been awarded
`
`numerous patents relating to fundamental innovations in wireless location technology for use in
`
`emergency, enterprise, and consumer settings. TracBeam is a limited liability company
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants
`
`4.
`
`T-Mobile US, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business in
`
`Bellevue, Washington and facilities and operations of relevance located throughout the country.
`
`T-Mobile US, Inc. was previously named MetroPCS Communications, Inc.1 MetroPCS
`
`Communications, Inc. was a named Defendant in TracBeam, LLC v. AT&T, Inc., et al., case no.
`
`6:11-cv-96 (LED) (E.D. Tex.) and was, by agreement, dismissed without prejudice on June 17,
`
`2013, with the express understanding that TracBeam’s claims against MetroPCS in that action
`
`would later be re-asserted following resolution of the claims against co-defendants AT&T
`
`Mobility and Cellco Partnership.
`
`
`
`5.
`
`T-Mobile USA, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business
`
`in Bellevue, Washington and facilities and operations of relevance located throughout the
`
`country. T-Mobile USA, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of T-Mobile US, Inc. MetroPCS
`
`Wireless, Inc. was merged with and into T-Mobile USA, Inc.2 MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. was also
`
`a named Defendant in TracBeam, LLC v. AT&T, Inc., et al. and was similarly dismissed without
`
`prejudice on June 17, 2013. Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc. are
`
`collectively referred to below as “T-Mobile.”
`
`
`
`
`1 MetroPCS’s Amended Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement filed May 30, 2013. TracBeam, LLC v. AT&T, Inc., et al.,
`case no. 6:11-cv-96 (LED) (E.D. Tex.), dkt. 386 at 1.
`2 Id.
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`

`
`Case 6:14-cv-00678 Document 1 Filed 08/08/14 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 3
`
`
`
`
`
`The Asserted Patents
`
`6.
`
`The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the ‘153 patent on October
`
`4, 2011 (exhibit A); the ‘231 patent (exhibit B) on July 27, 2010; the ‘484 patent (exhibit C) on
`
`April 28, 2009; and the ‘327 patent (exhibit D) on November 20, 2007. Plaintiff TracBeam is
`
`the owner of all right, title, and interest in the patents, including all rights to pursue and collect
`
`damages for infringement of the patents.
`
`
`
`
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`7.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281, et seq. The Court has original jurisdiction over this
`
`patent infringement action under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).
`
`
`
`8.
`
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(b) and §1400.
`
`Defendants have committed acts and continue to commit acts within this judicial district giving
`
`rise to this action. In addition, this Court has presided over other matters involving the asserted
`
`‘231 and ‘484 patents: TracBeam, LLC v. AT&T, Inc., et al., case no. 6:11-cv-96 (LED) and
`
`TracBeam, LLC v. Google Inc., case no. 6:13-cv-93 (LED).
`
`First Claim for Patent Infringement
`(‘153 patent)
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations in paragraphs 1-8 above
`
`
`
`9.
`
`and further alleges as follows.
`
`
`
`10.
`
`On October 4, 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued US
`
`Patent No. 8,032,153, which discloses and claims “Multiple Location Estimators for Wireless
`
`Location.” See also ‘153 Abstract (“A wireless location system is disclosed that may be
`
`configured as a gateway for receiving a plurality of requests for locating mobile stations for, e.g.,
`
`E911 requests, vehicle location or tracking.”).
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`

`
`Case 6:14-cv-00678 Document 1 Filed 08/08/14 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 4
`
`
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam is the owner of the ‘153 patent with full rights to pursue
`
`recovery of royalties or damages for infringement of the patent, including full rights to recover
`
`past and future damages.
`
`
`
`
`
`12.
`
`Each claim of the ‘153 patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`13.
`
`Defendants have directly infringed the ‘153 patent, and will continue to do so
`
`unless enjoined, by making, using, providing, selling, and offering for sale products and services
`
`that infringed the claims of the ‘153 patent, including Defendants’ (a) e911 location platforms
`
`and services and (b) commercial location based platforms and services. The foregoing
`
`allegations are made only with respect to the legacy MetroPCS network, products, and services.
`
`
`
`14.
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam has been damaged by Defendants’ infringement of the ‘153
`
`patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiff demands trial by jury of all issues relating to this claim.
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff reserves the right to amend to assert a claim of willful infringement if the
`
`evidence obtained in discovery supports such assertion.3
`
`Second Claim for Patent Infringement
`(‘231 patent)
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations in paragraphs 1-8 above
`
`
`
`17.
`
`and further alleges as follows.
`
`
`
`18.
`
`On July 27, 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued US
`
`Patent No. 7,764,231, which discloses and claims “Wireless Location Using Multiple Mobile
`
`Station Location Techniques.”
`
`
`
`19.
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam is the owner of the ‘231 patent with full rights to pursue
`
`recovery of royalties or damages for infringement of the patent, including full rights to recover
`
`
`3 Defendants were likely aware, at minimum, of the application that led to the issuance of the ‘154 patent
`(Application No. 12/014,092) since 2011 or earlier.
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`

`
`Case 6:14-cv-00678 Document 1 Filed 08/08/14 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 5
`
`past and future damages.
`
`
`
`
`
`20.
`
`Each claim of the ‘231 patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`21.
`
`Defendants have directly infringed the ‘231 patent, and will continue to do so
`
`unless enjoined, by making, using, providing, selling, and offering for sale products and services
`
`that infringed the claims of the ‘231 patent, including Defendants’ (a) e911 location platforms
`
`and services and (b) commercial location based platforms and services. The foregoing
`
`allegations are made with respect to both the legacy MetroPCS and the T-Mobile networks,
`
`products, and services.
`
`
`
`22.
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam has been damaged by Defendants’ infringement of the ‘231
`
`patent.
`
`
`
`23.
`
`Defendants’ infringement of the ‘231 patent has been and continues to be willful.
`
`Defendants have had knowledge of the ‘231 patent since at least February 2011 when they
`
`received notice letters from TracBeam and also a result of TracBeam’s assertion of the ‘231
`
`patent against Defendants in TracBeam, LLC v. AT&T, Inc., et al., case no. 6:11-cv-96 (LED).
`
`Defendants have disregarded an objectively high likelihood that their actions infringe the ‘231
`
`patent. This risk has been known to Defendants or is otherwise so obvious that it should have
`
`been known to Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`24.
`
`Plaintiff demands trial by jury of all issues relating to this claim.
`
`Third Claim for Patent Infringement
`(‘484 patent)
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations in paragraphs 1-8 above
`
`25.
`
`and further alleges as follows.
`
`
`
`26.
`
`On April 28, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued US
`
`Patent No. 7,525,484 which discloses and claims “Gateway and Hybrid Solutions for Wireless
`
`Location.”
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`

`
`Case 6:14-cv-00678 Document 1 Filed 08/08/14 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`27.
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam is the owner of the ‘484 patent with full rights to pursue
`
`recovery of royalties or damages for infringement of the patent, including full rights to recover
`
`past and future damages.
`
`
`
`
`
`28.
`
`Each claim of the ‘484 patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`29.
`
`Defendants have directly infringed the ‘484 patent, and will continue to do so
`
`unless enjoined, by making, using, providing, selling, and offering for sale products and services
`
`that infringed the claims of the ‘484 patent, including Defendants’ (a) e911 location platforms
`
`and services and (b) commercial location based platforms and services. The foregoing
`
`allegations are made only with respect to the T-Mobile networks, products, and services.
`
`
`
`30.
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam has been damaged by Defendants’ infringement of the ‘484
`
`patent.
`
`
`
`31.
`
`Defendants’ infringement of the ‘484 patent has been and continues to be willful.
`
`Defendants have had knowledge of the ‘484 patent since at least February 2011 when they
`
`received notice letters from TracBeam and also a result of TracBeam’s assertion of the ‘484
`
`patent against Defendants in TracBeam, LLC v. AT&T, Inc., et al., case no. 6:11-cv-96 (LED).
`
`Defendants have disregarded an objectively high likelihood that their actions infringe the ‘484
`
`patent. This risk has been known to Defendants or is otherwise so obvious that it should have
`
`been known to Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`32.
`
`Plaintiff demands trial by jury of all issues relating to this claim.
`
`Fourth Claim for Patent Infringement
`(‘327 patent)
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations in paragraphs 1-8 above
`
`33.
`
`and further alleges as follows.
`
`
`
`34.
`
`On November 20, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued US
`
`Patent No. 7,298,327 which discloses and claims “Geographic Location Using Multiple Location
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`

`
`Case 6:14-cv-00678 Document 1 Filed 08/08/14 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 7
`
`Estimators.”
`
`
`
`35.
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam is the owner of the ‘327 patent with full rights to pursue
`
`recovery of royalties or damages for infringement of the patent, including full rights to recover
`
`past and future damages.
`
`
`
`
`
`36.
`
`Each claim of the ‘327 patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`37.
`
`Defendants have directly infringed the ‘327 patent, and will continue to do so
`
`unless enjoined, by making, using, providing, selling, and offering for sale products and services
`
`that infringed the claims of the ‘327 patent, including Defendants’ (a) e911 location platforms
`
`and services and (b) commercial location based platforms and services. The foregoing
`
`allegations are made only with respect to the T-Mobile networks, products, and services.
`
`
`
`38.
`
`Plaintiff TracBeam has been damaged by Defendants’ infringement of the ‘327
`
`patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`39.
`
`Plaintiff demands trial by jury of all issues relating to this claim.
`
`40.
`
`Plaintiff reserves the right to amend to assert a claim of willful infringement if the
`
`evidence obtained in discovery supports such assertion.4
`
`Prayer for Relief
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment as follows:
`
`A.
`
`A judgment in favor of Plaintiff that Defendants have infringed each of the four
`
`asserted patents and that the patents are valid and enforceable;
`
`B.
`
`A judgment that Defendants have willfully infringed the ‘231 and ‘484 patents;
`
`C.
`
`A decree preliminarily and permanently enjoining Defendants as well as their
`
`officers, directors, employees, agents, and all persons in active concert with them,
`
`from infringing the asserted patents;
`
`4 Defendants were likely aware, at minimum, of the application that led to the issuance of the ‘327 patent
`(Application No. 10/262,413) since 2011 or earlier.
`
`7
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`

`
`Case 6:14-cv-00678 Document 1 Filed 08/08/14 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 8
`
`D.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Defendants to pay Plaintiff compensatory
`
`damages, costs, expenses, and pre- and post-judgment interest for Defendants’
`
`infringement of the asserted patents, as provided under 35 U.S.C. §284;
`
`E.
`
`A judgment and order finding that this patent infringement case is exceptional
`
`within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. §285 and awarding Plaintiff its reasonable
`
`attorneys’ fees and costs; and
`
`Any and all other relief to which Plaintiff may be entitled.
`
`F.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 8, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Elizabeth L. DeRieux
`John Jeffrey Eichmann
`CA State Bar No. 227472
`(Admitted to practice in the Eastern
`District of Texas)
`DOVEL & LUNER, LLP
`201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600
`Santa Monica, CA 90401
`Telephone: 310-656-7066
`Facsimile: 310-657-7069
`jeff@dovel.com
`
`S. Calvin Capshaw
`State Bar No. 03783900
`Elizabeth L. DeRieux
`State Bar No. 05770585
`CAPSHAW DERIEUX, LLP
`114 E. Commerce
`Gladewater, Texas 75647
`Telephone: (903) 236-9800
`Facsimile: (903) 236-8787
`Email: capshaw@capshawlaw.com
`Email: ederieux@capshawlaw.com
`
`Robert M. Parker
`State Bar No. 15498000
`Robert Christopher Bunt
`State Bar No. 00787165
`Charles Ainsworth
`State Bar No. 00783521
`
`8
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`

`
`Case 6:14-cv-00678 Document 1 Filed 08/08/14 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 9
`
`PARKER, BUNT &
`AINSWORTH PC
`100 East Ferguson, Ste. 1114
`Tyler, TX 75702
`Telephone: (903) 531-3535
`Facsimile: (903) 533-9687
`Email: rmparker@pbatyler.com
`Email: rcbunt@pbatyler.com
`Email: charley@pbatyler.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`TRACBEAM, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`Page 9 of 9

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket