throbber
COMMON TOXICITY
`CRITERIA MANUAL
`
`Common Toxicity Criteria, Version 2.0
`June 1, 1999
`
`NCI CTEP Help Desk -
`Telephone: (301) 840-8202
`Fax: (301) 948-2242
`E-mail: ncictephelp@ctep.nci.nih.gov
`
`AVENTIS EXHIBIT 2229
`Mylan v. Aventis IPR2016-00712
`
`

`
`Table of Contents
`COMMON TOXICITY CRITERIA QUICK REFERENCE .......................................................... 1
`1
`INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 5
`1.1
`Purpose of this Manual................................................................................................. 5
`1.2 Making the Entire CTC Available to those Responsible for
`Grading Adverse Events .............................................................................................. 5
`1.3 Defining Adverse Event............................................................................................... 5
`1.4
`Specificity of the CTC ................................................................................................. 6
`2 ORGANIZATION OF THE CTC............................................................................................. 6
`2.1 Adverse Event Categories in the Revised CTC ........................................................... 6
`2.2 Adverse Event Listings ................................................................................................ 7
`2.3 Grades of Adverse Events............................................................................................ 7
`2.4 Adverse Events Not Included in the CTC.................................................................... 8
`2.5 Where to Find Adverse Events from the 1982 Version of the CTC ............................ 8
`2.6 Highlights of Important Changes ................................................................................. 9
`2.7 Appendices to the CTC .............................................................................................. 10
`3 HOW TO GRADE ADVERSE EVENTS .............................................................................. 11
`3.1 What Not to Grade ..................................................................................................... 11
`3.2 Attribution of Causality.............................................................................................. 11
`3.3 Grading at Baseline.................................................................................................... 12
`3.4 Documenting Related Adverse Events....................................................................... 12
`3.5 Grading Adverse Events ............................................................................................ 17
`3.6
`Syndromes.................................................................................................................. 18
`3.7 Dose-limiting Adverse Event..................................................................................... 18
`SUPPLEMENTARY FORMS ................................................................................................ 19
`4.1 Adverse Event Module............................................................................................... 19
`4.2
`Infection Module........................................................................................................ 19
`5 GRADING TOXICITIES IN SPECIAL POPULATIONS..................................................... 19
`5.1 Leukemia Special Adverse Event Criteria ................................................................. 19
`5.2 Bone Marrow/Stem Cell Transplant .......................................................................... 20
`5.3
`Pediatric Adverse Event Criteria................................................................................ 20
`6 RADIATION THERAPY TOXICITIES ................................................................................ 21
`6.1 Acute Radiation Adverse Event ................................................................................. 21
`6.2 Late Radiation Effects................................................................................................ 22
`7 MULTIMODALITY THERAPIES ........................................................................................ 23
`7.1 Grading Adverse Events in Multimodality Therapies when Options are Available .. 23
`8 HARMONIZATION WITH THE INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY ........ 23
`9 CTC USER TOOLS................................................................................................................ 24
`Appendix I: REVISION OF THE COMMON TOXICITY CRITERIA .................................... 25
`COMMON TOXICITY CRITERIA QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE
`
`4
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`COMMON TOXICITY CRITERIA QUICK REFERENCE
`Definition of Adverse Event
`• Toxicity – Toxicity is NOT clearly defined by regulatory organizations. Toxicity
`has been described as an adverse event that has an attribution (the relationship to
`investigational agent) of possible, probable or definite. To minimize confusion,
`the NCI would recommend that the term toxicity NOT be utilized.
`Note: The Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Common Toxicity Criteria,
`Version 2.0 (CTC, v2.0) uses the term “toxicity” for historical reasons, but
`recommends that the term “adverse event” with its attribution be used instead
`whenever possible.
`• Adverse Event – Any unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease (including an
`abnormal laboratory finding) temporally associated with the use of a medical
`treatment or procedure that may or may NOT be considered related to the medical
`treatment or procedure.
`• Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC)1 – The CTC, v2.0 provides descriptive
`terminology for adverse event reporting. A grading (severity) scale is provided
`for each adverse event term.
`Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Categories
`• CTC, v2.0 contains 24 categories.
`• CTC, v2.0 is organized by pathophysiology and anatomy.
`• Alphabetical listings of adverse events are placed within categories.
`• The entire CTC, v2.0 should always be available for grading adverse events;
`however, NCI only requires grading of adverse events that occur.
`Changes to the CTC, v2.0
`Major changes in the new version of the CTC, v2.0 are outlined in Sections 2.4 and 2.5 of
`this manual.
`
`
`1 All studies reviewed and approved after March 5, 1998 must utilize the CTC version 2.0 standards 1998
`for adverse event grading and attribution.
`
`1
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`Grades (General Definitions)
`• 0 = No adverse event or within normal limits
`• 1 = Mild adverse event
`• 2 = Moderate adverse event
`• 3 = Severe and undesirable adverse event
`• 4 = Life-threatening or disabling adverse event
`• 5 = Death related to adverse event
`
`•
`
`The definition of Dose-limiting adverse event is determined by the protocol and not
`by the CTC.
`Grading Adverse Events
`• Any treatment-related adverse event experienced by a patient is graded using the
`specific adverse event terms listed in the CTC, v2.0.
`• Grading is not modified based on a patient’s condition at baseline. Whenever
`possible, baseline data, including laboratory data and signs and symptoms noted
`at study entry, should be collected within the institution as course 0, although at
`present, there is no electronic reporting capability for baseline data within the
`Clinical Data Update System (CDUS).
`If a given adverse event is experienced more than once during a cycle, only the
`grade associated with the most severe adverse event is reported.
`• Syndromes are graded only when diagnosed by a physician; notes within the
`CTC, v2.0 provide guidelines to determine when to grade components of each
`syndrome.
`• Adverse events not included in the CTC, v2.0 should be reported and graded
`under the “Other” adverse event within the appropriate category and graded 1 to 5
`according to the general grade definitions provided above.
`• Several adverse events contain notes reminding the investigator of other related
`adverse events that may occur in association and should be considered for
`grading.
`• Multimodality Therapies – Most adverse events and grading criteria are
`applicable to any treatment modality. Some are specified for a particular
`modality. The most relevant adverse event should be used to grade adverse
`events. When it is not possible to determine whether one or both contributed, use
`the most relevant description of the adverse event.
`
`2
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`Scale for Attribution of Adverse Event
`
`Assign attribution of each adverse event reported in an NCI-sponsored IND study using
`the following criteria:
`
`ATTRIBUTION OF ADVERSE EVENTS
`Code Descriptor
`5
`Definite
`
`Definition
`The adverse event is clearly related to the investigational
`agent(s)
`The adverse event is likely related to the investigational agent(s)
`The adverse event may be related to the investigational agent(s)
`The adverse event is doubtfully related to the investigational
`agent(s)
`The adverse event is clearly not related to the investigational
`agent(s)
`
`4
`3
`2
`
`1
`
`Probable
`Possible
`Unlikely
`
`Unrelated
`
`What not to Grade
`• Disease progression or signs and symptoms definitely related to disease should
`not be graded. Objective documentation of progression should always be sought.
`• Treatment delivery system malfunctions should not be graded as adverse events.
`Options for More Detailed Reporting
`
`When required by the protocol, additional information may be collected using two special
`modules:
`• Adverse Event Module
`•
`Infections Module
`Populations and Modalities
`When selecting which criteria to use for an adverse event, use the one most consistent
`with the patient population or treatment modality.
`Special criteria for pediatric populations and bone marrow transplant, leukemia, and
`radiation treatment modalities are shaded in the CTC, v2.0 for easy recognition.
`Special Populations
`• Pediatrics – Adverse events and adverse event criteria relevant only to
`children are identified by italic type for easy recognition.
`Treatment Modalities
`• Bone Marrow Transplant Adverse Events – Specialized criteria are included
`for grading Leukocytes, Platelets, Transfusion: platelets, Transfusion: pRBCs,
`Weight gain-Veno Occlusive Disease (VOD), Bilirubin-Graft Versus Host
`
`3
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`Disease (GVHD), and Stomatitis/pharyngitis for bone marrow transplant, but
`their use must be designated in the protocol.
`• An appendix for grading BMT-related complex/multicomponent events is
`available in the CTC, v2.0.
`• Special grading criteria that may be more pertinent to leukemia, but that
`require calculations, are available for grading Hemoglobin (Hgb),
`Neutrophils, Platelets, and Fibrinogen for leukemia studies, but their use must
`be designated in the protocol.
`• Radiation therapy adverse events are subdivided by time of onset.
`• Acute Radiation Effects (day 1 through day 90) are
`included in the main listing of adverse events.
`• Late Radiation Effects ( all effects seen after 90 days from
`the beginning of radiation therapy are considered late
`effects) developed by RTOG and EORTC are in Appendix
`IV of the CTC, v2.0.
`
`Questions and Comments:
`
`If you have any questions or comments regarding the Common Toxicity Criteria,
`Version 2.0, please contact the NCI CTEP Help Desk by telephone (301) 840-
`8202, fax (301) 948-2242, or E-mail at ncictephelp@ctep.nci.nih.gov.
`Additional information regarding the Common Toxicity Criteria is available on the CTEP
`Home Page (http://ctep.info.nih.gov). Other Common Toxicity Criteria information
`available from the CTEP Home Page:
`•
`Interactive CTC Application
`• Download and print CTC, v2.0
`• CTC Index
`• CTC Manual
`• Generic CTC Data Collection Form
`•
`Instructional CTC Slide Presentation
`
`4
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`1. INTRODUCTION
`The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) were developed in
`1982 for use in adverse drug experience reporting, study adverse event summaries,
`Investigational New Drug (IND) reports to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
`and publications. The CTC have been used widely for collecting treatment-related
`adverse event data to facilitate the evaluation of new cancer therapies, treatment
`modalities, and supportive measures. The original version of the CTC had 49 adverse
`event terms grouped in 18 categories, each with criteria for grading the severity of the
`adverse event. In the intervening years, in an effort to report additional adverse events
`seen in their studies, many groups independently added supplemental adverse event
`criteria to describe adverse events that were not originally included. Consequently,
`criteria adopted by various groups differed. To improve completeness, accuracy, and
`precision of the CTC, and to standardize reporting across groups and therapeutic
`modalities, a Common Toxicity Criteria Review Committee was assembled to revise and
`expand the CTC to meet current needs.
`1.1
`Purpose of this Manual
`
`This manual has been developed to assist users in making the transition from the original
`CTC to the revised and expanded Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Common
`Toxicity Criteria, Version 2.0 (CTC, v2.0) and to introduce investigators who have never
`used the CTC to this grading system.
`1.2 Making the Entire CTC Available to those Responsible for Grading
`Adverse Events
`
`To ensure accuracy, the entire CTC, v2.0 should be readily available to those grading
`adverse events at each site where patients are evaluated. NCI only requires grading of
`those adverse events that occur (unless a protocol mandates grading of specific terms,
`even when they do not occur).
`1.3
`Defining Adverse Event
`• Toxicity – Toxicity is NOT clearly defined by regulatory organizations. The term
`toxicity is generally used for an adverse event that is possibly, probably, or
`definitely related to the agent or treatment.
`Note: The Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program CTC, v2.0 continues to use the
`term “toxicity” for historical reasons, but recommends that the term “adverse
`event” with its attributes be used instead whenever possible.
`• Adverse Event – Any unfavorable or unintended symptom, sign, or disease
`(including an abnormal laboratory finding), temporally associated with the use of
`a medical treatment or procedure that may or may NOT be considered related to
`the medical treatment or procedure.
`
`5
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`1.4
`
`Specificity of the CTC
`
`The CTC, v2.0 and its associated grading criteria are very specific. Although more
`individual adverse events are included in the new version, the number of events a patient
`experiences will not change. In the revision process, care was taken to ensure that,
`wherever possible, each adverse event represented a single clearly definable clinical
`entity. In most instances, the CTC, v2.0 will provide an adverse event term and grade
`that more precisely describes the adverse event. The compilation of adverse events used
`to describe an incident will provide more complete characterization of the events that
`occur; they do not necessarily indicate more toxic agents. The goal of the CTC, v2.0 is to
`facilitate a description of the adverse events that do occur. The CTC, v2.0 includes “Also
`Consider” notes associated with adverse events to direct the user toward other adverse
`events that require grading if they also occurred.
`2. ORGANIZATION OF THE CTC
`The CTC, v2.0 includes 24 categories of adverse events with more than 200 individual
`adverse events. In addition, there are six appendices fully described in Section 2.6.
`2.1 Adverse Event Categories in the Revised CTC
`
`The primary organization of the CTC, v2.0 is based on pathophysiological (e.g.,
`Allergy/Immunology) and anatomical (e.g., Dermatology/Skin) categories to facilitate
`location of related adverse events. The following is a list of categories of adverse events
`in the CTC, v2.0; new categories or categories with expanded titles are identified by bold
`type.
`
`• INFECTION OR FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA
`• LYMPHATICS
`• METABOLIC/LABORATORY
`• MUSCULOSKELETAL
`
`Categories in the CTC, v2.0
`• ALLERGY/IMMUNOLOGY
`• AUDITORY/HEARING
`• BLOOD/BONE MARROW
`• CARDIOVASCULAR
`(ARRHYTHMIA)
`• NEUROLOGY
`• CARDIOVASCULAR (GENERAL)
`• COAGULATION
`• OCULAR/VISUAL
`• CONSTITUTIONAL SYMPTOMS
`• PAIN
`• PULMONARY
`• DERMATOLOGY/SKIN
`• RENAL/GENITOURINARY
`• ENDOCRINE
`• GASTROINTESTINAL
`• SECONDARY MALIGNANCIES
`• HEMORRHAGE
`• SEXUAL/REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTION
`• HEPATIC
`• SYNDROMES
`Within each of these categories, specific adverse events are listed alphabetically and
`graded.
`
`6
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`2.2 Adverse Event Listings
`
`In revising the CTC, attention was directed to adverse events that occur with varying
`cancer therapies and patient populations. The CTC, v2.0 classifies adverse events that
`occur with investigational treatments including chemotherapy, biological therapy,
`radiation therapy, and surgery. For selected adverse events, different grading criteria are
`provided together for different patient populations. The adverse event name is the same;
`only the criteria for grading are changed. All special criteria are identified by shaded text.
`For pediatrics and radiation therapy, these pertinent criteria should be used routinely.
`• For the pediatric population special adverse events and grading criteria have
`been added to account for such child-specific problems as developmental deficits
`or adjusted laboratory values. Pediatric adverse events or notes referring to
`pediatric adverse events are identified by italic type.
`• Adverse events and grading criteria specially developed by RTOG for radiation
`therapy are included.
`• Special optional criteria for bone marrow transplant have been added to describe
`and grade some adverse events. Also optional is the BMT-related
`Complex/Multicomponent Events Appendix included to facilitate the evaluation
`of events according to published criteria.
`The following adverse events must be specified in the protocol if these alternative
`criteria proposed by leukemia and bone marrow transplant experts are to be used.
`• Leukemia – criteria requiring calculations for grading changes in Hemoglobin,
`Platelets, Neutrophils, and Fibrinogen.
`• Bone marrow transplant – Leukocytes, Platelets, Transfusion: platelets,
`Transfusion: pRBCs, Weight gain VOD, Bilirubin-GVHD, and
`Stomatitis/pharyngitis.
`• Appendix for BMT-related Complex/Multicomponent Events.
`When selecting which criterion to use, choose the one most consistent with the patient
`population or treatment modality.
`2.3 Grades of Adverse Events
`
`For each adverse event, grades are assigned and defined using a scale from 0 to 5 with 0
`representing no adverse event within normal limits and 5 representing death related to an
`adverse event. Specific criteria for each grade are included for each adverse event.
`0 = No adverse event or within normal limits
`1 = Mild adverse event
`2 = Moderate adverse event
`3 = Severe and undesirable adverse event
`4 = Life-threatening or disabling adverse event
`5 = Death related to adverse event
`
`7
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`Grading is based on specific clinical criteria that usually require evaluation by the
`clinician.
`
`Example: CARDIOVASCULAR Category
`An acute myocardial infarction would be graded within the CARDIOVASCULAR
`(GENERAL) category using the grading for Cardiac-ischemia/infarction.
`Grade
`
`Adverse Event
`Cardiac-ischemia/infarction
`
`1
`non-specific T – wave
`flattening or changes
`
`2
`asymptomatic, ST –
`and T – wave changes
`suggesting ischemia
`Acute myocardial infarction would be graded as Cardiac-ischemia/infarction, Grade 4.
`2.4 Adverse Events Not Included in the CTC, v2.0
`
`3
`angina without
`evidence of infarction
`
`4
`acute myocardial
`infarction
`
`Adverse events not included in the CTC, v2.0 should be reported and graded under the
`“Other” adverse event within the appropriate category and graded as mild (Grade 1),
`moderate (Grade 2), severe (Grade 3), life-threatening or disabling (Grade 4), or fatal
`(Grade 5) using the general definitions provided. New adverse events may be submitted
`to the NCI CTEP Help Desk where the CTC Change Management Committee will
`compile them for annual evaluation. A subcommittee for the CTC Revision Group will
`assess new adverse event terms for inclusion in future updates.
`2.5 Where to Find Adverse Events from the 1982 Version of the CTC
`
`Many of the adverse events included in the 1982 version of the CTC have been retained
`in the current version. In many cases, the names of the adverse events have been
`retained, but the grading criteria have been refined. In other cases, original adverse
`events have been split into two or more different adverse events. Several examples of
`these are displayed below:
`
`8
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`Transaminase
`
`Weight gain/loss
`
`CTC 1982 Version CTC, v2.0
`Pulmonary
`Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
`Carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO)
`Cough
`Dyspnea
`FEV1
`Hypoxia
`Pneumonitis/infiltrates
`Pneumothorax
`Pulmonary fibrosis
`SGOT (AST)
`SGPT (ALT)
`Weight gain
`Weight loss
`Weight gain - Veno-Occlusive Disease (VOD)
`2.6 Highlights of Important Changes
`Some specific changes in the CTC, v2.0 include:
`• Some adverse events now contain “Also Consider” notes that ask the clinician to
`consider other adverse events that frequently occur in association. If any are
`present, they should also be graded.
`In the BLOOD/BONE MARROW category, criteria for the Platelets Grade 4 has
`changed from <25,000/mm2 to <10,000/mm2.
`• Cardiovascular adverse events have been divided into two separate categories,
`CARDIOVASCULAR (ARRHYTHMIA) and CARDIOVASCULAR
`(GENERAL). Many of the new adverse event terms are very specific and require
`diagnostic procedures and evaluation by a clinician, e.g., specific arrhythmias are
`identified from ECG tracings. Only when symptoms suggesting an irregular
`heartbeat are reported by a patient in the absence of confirmatory ECG diagnostic
`of a specific arrhythmia, should Palpitations be graded.
`In the CONSTITUTIONAL SYMPTOMS category, Weight gain and Weight loss
`are included as separate adverse events. When there is an obvious reason for the
`change in weight such as ascites, edema, pleural effusion, dehydration, vomiting,
`or diarrhea, also grade the condition causing the weight gain or loss unless it is
`definitely tumor-related. If no cause is apparent, grade only Weight gain or
`Weight loss. An additional adverse event, Weight gain-VOD has been added for
`use in describing weight changes that occur in Veno-Occlusive Disease (VOD) in
`bone marrow transplant patients.
`• There are four important notes at the beginning of the HEMORRHAGE category
`to provide overall guidance on grading adverse events in this category. New
`
`•
`
`•
`
`9
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`adverse event terms have been added to differentiate between
`Hemorrhage/bleeding with Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and
`Hemorrhage/bleeding without Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia.
`• Adverse Events in the INFECTION/FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA category are
`categorized as to whether they occurred with or without neutropenia. The adverse
`event Infection with unknown ANC is available for use in the rare instance when
`an infection occurs with an unknown neutrophil count. Catheter-related infection
`is a new, additional adverse event.
`• The adverse event terms in the NEUROLOGY category have been extensively
`revised to provide more specific adverse event descriptions. A number of grading
`criteria in the original CTC have been split into separate adverse events and
`graded.
`• The PAIN category includes a variety of sites of pain. The intent of this category
`is to describe pain that may result from (or be exacerbated by) treatment, not pain
`due to underlying disease alone. One adverse event, Tumor pain is reserved for
`pain localized to tumor that begins or is exacerbated in relationship to therapy. It
`is not to be used when there is no change from baseline or when worsening is
`clearly due to tumor progression.
`2.7 Appendices to the CTC
`Appendices I to VI are described below:
`• Appendix I: Adverse Event Module for the rare situation when a sponsor or
`principal investigator requires more detail regarding specific
`adverse events. This module is required only when mandated by
`the protocol, generally when a new or previously undescribed
`adverse event is identified.
`• Appendix II: Infection Module for detailed information regarding infections in
`the rare situations where additional detail is required. This module
`is required only when mandated by the protocol.
`• Appendix III:Performance Status Scales/Scores.
`• Appendix IV:RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring includes
`adverse events that occur more than 90 days after initiation of
`radiation therapy. These criteria were previously developed by
`RT0G and EORTC and have not been revised.
`• Appendix V: BMT-Specific Adverse Events for a summary of BMT-Specific
`Adverse Events that may be used if specified by the protocol.
`These differ from the standard CTC and may be more relevant to
`the transplant setting. They are included in the CTC document and
`listed separately in Appendix V for the convenience of
`investigators writing transplant protocols.
`• Appendix VI:BMT Complex/Multicomponent Events.
`
`10
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`3. HOW TO GRADE ADVERSE EVENTS
`3.1 What Not to Grade
`• Disease progression or signs and symptoms definitely related to disease should
`not be graded.
`Treatment delivery system malfunctions or sequelae related only to the treatment delivery
`system, such as a broken needle requiring excision, should not be graded as adverse
`events.
`3.2 Attribution of Causality
`
`To ensure that treatment-related conditions are distinguished from disease-related
`conditions, attribution of causality is a critical though often difficult first step in grading
`adverse events. All symptoms, signs, or diseases (including abnormal laboratory
`findings), that might be associated with investigational agents or therapies must be
`captured and graded. For each event, the attending physician or clinician in conjunction
`with the research nurse who examined and evaluated the patient, should assign the
`attribution. This important task must not be performed by data managers who are
`removed from the clinical assessment of the patient.
`Attribution should be determined using the following criteria:
`ATTRIBUTION OF ADVERSE EVENTS
`Code Descriptor
`5
`Definite
`
`Definition
`The adverse event is clearly related to the investigational
`agent(s)
`The adverse event is likely related to the investigational agent(s)
`The adverse event may be related to the investigational agent(s)
`The adverse event is doubtfully related to the investigational
`agent(s)
`The adverse event is clearly not related to the investigational
`agent(s)
`Investigators must document and grade adverse event data if there is any probable,
`possible or definite relationship to the agent. Adverse events that are definitely related to
`disease should not be graded. If an adverse event is caused by a combination of
`treatment and disease, the adverse event should be graded as it is observed with no
`adjustment. Early in the development of an agent, when little is known of an agent’s
`safety profile, it is especially important to maintain a high level of suspicion and report
`adverse events that may be agent-related adverse events. Careful reporting is needed to
`identify idiosyncratic or low frequency agent-related adverse events that may not yet
`have been identified.
`Note that requirements for expedited reporting for serious and unexpected events are
`specified in each protocol.
`
`4
`3
`2
`
`1
`
`Probable
`Possible
`Unlikely
`
`Unrelated
`
`11
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`3.3 Grading at Baseline
`
`Investigators are encouraged to record baseline values as course 0, though NCI does not
`currently provide a mechanism for electronic capture of baseline data in the Clinical Data
`Update System (CDUS). Course 0 baseline pretreatment information will be considered
`for future updates of the CDUS. No modification in grading should be made to account
`for abnormalities noted at baseline. For example, if a patient enters a trial with an AST
`value twice the upper limit of normal (Grade 1) and at the end of cycle two of therapy the
`AST is 6 times the upper limit of normal, Grade 3 AST should be reported (in this case,
`course 0 or baseline AST would be Grade 1). Note that the availability of Course 0
`information allows subsequent analysis of AST abnormalities according to whether
`patients had preexisting hepatic abnormalities or not.
`3.4 Documenting Related Adverse Events
`
`In some cases an adverse event will be associated with the occurrence of one or more
`additional adverse events. These may or may not require grading, depending upon the
`specific case. In general, related adverse events must be graded when the related adverse
`event is clinically significant and provides relevant information to allow evaluators of the
`data to more fully characterize an adverse event. If several adverse events are actually
`due to one primary diagnosis, it is generally not necessary to include all of the
`components because they are expected. Several examples follow.
`
`•
`
`Example: GASTROINTESTINAL Category
`A patient has diarrhea with dehydration causing hypotension and requiring parenteral
`support.
`• The classification of Diarrhea as Grade 3 requires an increase of ≥ 7 stools per
`day, or be so severe that parenteral support is required for dehydration.
`If dehydration did occur, it should also be graded. The dehydration may be:
`Grade 2, requiring IV fluid replacement (brief);
`Grade 3, requiring IV fluid replacement (sustained); or
`Grade 4, hypotension requiring intensive care or
`hemodynamic collapse.
`If the resulting dehydration is Grade 4, then hypotension in the CARDIOVASCULAR
`(GENERAL) category also should be graded.
`Grade
`
`Adverse Event
`Diarrhea
`patients without colostomy:
`
`1
`increase of <4
`stools/day over pre-
`treatment
`
`2
`increase of 4-6
`stools/day, or nocturnal
`stools
`
`3
`increase of ≥7
`stools/day or
`incontinence; or need
`for parenteral support
`for dehydration
`
`4
`physiologic
`consequences requiring
`intensive care; or
`hemodynamic collapse
`
`!
`
`12
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`Adverse Event
`Dehydration
`
`1
`dry mucous
`membranes and/or
`diminished skin turgor
`
`Grade
`
`2
`requiring IV fluid
`replacement (brief)
`
`3
`requiring IV fluid
`replacement
`(sustained)
`
`4
`physiologic
`consequences requiring
`intensive care;
`hemodynamic collapse
`
`Also consider Diarrhea, Vomiting, Stomatitis/pharyngitis (oral/pharyngeal mucositis), Hypotension.
`
`3
`requiring therapy and
`sustained medical
`attention, but resolves
`without persisting
`physiologic
`consequences
`
`4
`shock (associated with
`acidemia and impairing
`vital organ function
`due to tissue
`hypoperfusion)
`
`!G
`
`rade
`
`2
`requiring brief fluid
`replacement or other
`therapy but not
`hospitalization; no
`physiologic
`consequences
`
`1
`changes, but not
`requiring therapy
`(including transient
`orthostatic
`hypotension)
`
`Adverse Event
`Hypotension
`
`Also consider Syncope (fainting).
`Notes: Angina or MI is graded as Cardiac-ischemia/infarction in the CARDIOVASCULAR (GENERAL) category.
`For pediatric patients, systolic BP 65 mmHg or less in infants up to 1 year old and 70 mmHg or less in children older than 1 year
`of age, use two successive or three measurements in 24 hours.
`
`Example: HEMORRHAGE Category
`A patient with 20,000 platelets has a hemorrhage of the lower GI tract requiring both
`platelet transfusion and packed red blood cell transfusion. Her hemoglobin is 7.0 g/dL.
`The adverse event Hemorrhage/bleeding with Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia requires
`that the site or type of bleeding be reported as well as Platelets, Hemoglobin, and, if
`given, Platelet transfusion, and/or pRBC transfusion.
`Grade
`
`1
`mild without
`transfusion
`
`2
`
`4
`Adverse Event
`catastrophic bleeding,
`Hemorrhage/bleeding with
`requiring major non-
`grade 3 or 4
`elective intervention
`thrombocytopenia
`Also consider Platelets, Hemoglobin, Transfusion: platelets, Transfusion: pRBCs, site or type of bleeding. If the site is not listed, grade
`as Hemorrhage-Other (Specify site, ___________).
`Note: This adverse event must be graded for any bleeding with grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia.
`
`3
`requiring transfusion
`
`3
`requiring transfusion
`
`4
`catastrophic bleeding,
`requiring major non-
`elective intervention
`
`!G
`
`rade
`
`!
`
`Adverse Event
`Melena/GI bleeding
`
`1
`mild without
`transfusion
`
`2
`-
`
`13
`
`

`
`Common Toxicity Criteria Manual
`
`3
`≥10.0 - <50.0 x 109 /L
`≥10,000 -
`<50,000/mm3
`≥10.0 - <20.0 x 109 /L
`≥10,000 -
`<20,000/mm3
`50 - <75% decrease
`from baseline
`
`4
`<10.0 x 109 /L
`<10,000/mm3
`
`<10.0 x 109 /L
`<10,000/mm3
`
`≥75% decrease from
`baseline
`
`3
`6.5 - <8.0 g/dL
`65 - <80 g/L
`4.0 - <4.9 mmol/L
`50 - <75% decrea

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket