throbber
6/17/2016 An open­label, multi centre, phase II, non­comparative trial of ZD1839 monotherapy in chemotherapy­naive patients with stage IV or stage III non­operable…
`
`Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. 
`Vol 23, No 16S (June 1 Supplement), 2005: 7098 
`© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology
`Abstract
`An open­label, multi centre, phase II, non­comparative trial of
`ZD1839 monotherapy in chemotherapy­naive patients with
`stage IV or stage III non­operable non­small cell lung cancer
`(NSCLC)
`M. Reck, U. Gatzemeier, E. Bucholz, C. G. Gahlemann and C. Manegold
`
`Hosp Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Thoraxklinik Heidelberg Rohrbach,
`Heidelberg, Germany; AstraZeneca, Wedel, Germany
`
`7098
`
`Background: Second­ or third­line gefitinib (IRESSA) monotherapy is active and well
`tolerated in patients with advanced non­small­cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this
`study was to determine the efficacy and safety of gefitinib as monotherapy in
`chemotherapy­naïve patients with good performance status (PS). Methods:
`Chemotherapy­naïve patients who had PS 0–2 with histologically confirmed, non­operable,
`stage III/IV NSCLC were enrolled. Patients received gefitinib 250 mg/day until disease
`progression. To ensure that the best available treatment was not withheld for an undue
`length of time, tumors were assessed by X­ray at weeks 3 and 9, and by computed
`tomography every 6 weeks following start of treatment. Results: 58 out of 59 patients
`were evaluable: Histology: Adeno carcinoma (CA) (32); bronchioalveolar CA (10);
`squamous cell CA (8); large cell CA (4); other (4). Median age: 67 years (range 41–84).
`Smoking history: current 33%, former 48%, never 19%. PS 0/1/2: 10%;66%,24%.
`Response: complete response (CR; n=1; 2%), partial response (PR; n=2; 3%), stable
`disease (SD; n=23; 40%); progressive disease (PD; n=28; 48%). Median progression free
`survival to date: 52 days. 14 patients are still undergoing treatment. There were no
`therapy­related serious adverse events. Grade 3 toxicities were rash 1,7%, nausea 1,7%,
`fatigue 6,9%, cough 3,4%, pain 1,7%. Conclusions: Gefitinib as first­line monotherapy
`has activity in patients with advanced NSCLC, with clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD) observed
`in 45% (26/58) of patients. Due to the favorable tolerability profile, gefitinib should be
`investigated further in controlled, randomized studies in those patients who are unable to
`tolerate, or who refuse, chemotherapy. IRESSA is a trademark of the AstraZeneca group
`of companies
`
`Author Disclosure
`
`Employment or
`Leadership
`
`Consultant or
`Advisory Role
`
`Stock
`Ownership Honoraria
`
`Research
`Funding
`
`Expert
`Testimony
`
`Other
`Remuneration
`
`AstraZeneca
`
`Abstract presentation from the 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting
`
`CYRAMZA as a single agent,
`or in combination with
`paclitaxel, is indicated for the
`treatment of patients with
`advanced or metastatic
`gastric or gastroesophageal 
`junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma 
`with disease progression on or
`after prior fluoropyrimidine­
`or platinum­containing
`chemotherapy.
`
`Safety and Boxed Warning
`SAFETY AND BOXED WARNING
`Hemorrhage: CYRAMZA increased the risk of
`hemorrhage and gastrointestinal hemorrhage,
`including severe and sometimes fatal hemorrhagic
`events. Permanently discontinue CYRAMZA in
`patients who experience severe bleeding.
`Advertisement
`
`Advertisement
`
`http://meeting.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/short/23/16_suppl/7098
`
`1/1
`
`AVENTIS EXHIBIT 2085
`Mylan v. Aventis, IPR2016-00712

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket