throbber
‘Last ditch‘ prostate cancer drug to be AXED from the NHS
`
`‘Last hope‘ drug for prostate cancer patients is axed from the NHS,
`
`in a move doctors call a ‘travesty‘
`
`Jetvana gives men with prostate cancer at least three months of life
`
`But some men given the drug have survived three or more years
`
`Cancer Drugs Fund plans to axe drug from its approved list from March
`
`They say it is not cost-effective and doesn't offer ‘sufficient clinical benefit‘
`
`Charities say the appraisal system for drugs is broken, failing patients
`
`40,000 men in Britain diagnosed each year, over 10,000 die from disease
`
`Published: 08:04 EST, 9 January 2015 | Updated: 16:45 EST, 9 January 2015
`
`132
`
`I
`
`'7'”- n.'.: or-:!an.i't;or'l:il's
`
`Share this article
`
`Share
`
`132 shares
`
`The decision to stop NHS use of Jevtana — it has already been rejected by the rationing body NICE — follows
`
`news that six breast cancer drugs prescribed for thousands of women are also set to be axed.Some men
`
`whose prostate cancer has spread will have no other treatment option.Dr Alison Birtle, consultant clinical
`
`oncologist at Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, said the decision was a travesty.She
`
`AVENTIS EXHIBIT 2064
`Mylan v. Aventis, IPR2016-00712

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket