throbber
Paper No. ___
`Filed: May 19, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________________
`
`
`
`MYLAN LABORATIORIES, LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`AVENTIS PHARMA S.A.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________________________
`
`Case IPR2016-00712
`Patent 8,927,592
`_____________________________
`
`PETITIONER MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITED’S
`MOTION TO SEAL
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-00712
`Patent 8,927,592
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.14, Petitioner Mylan Laboratories, Ltd. (“Mylan”
`
`or “Petitioner”) respectfully submits Petitioner’s Reply in Support of Motion to
`
`Exclude Evidence under seal because it discusses Exhibit 1042 (Tate Deposition
`
`Transcript) and Papers 64 and 72. Aventis has designated each of these documents
`
`confidential subject to the Stipulated Protective Order (Paper 36). Petitioner has
`
`not presently filed a redacted version of the Reply in Support of Motion to
`
`Exclude. Upon confirmation from Aventis that portions of the Reply in Support of
`
`Motion to Exclude may be filed publicly or an order from the Board permitting the
`
`public filing, Petitioner is willing to file a redacted version of the Reply in Support
`
`of Motion to Exclude.
`
`II. GOOD CAUSE MUST EXIST FOR SEALING CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION
`
`The record of a proceeding is open and available for access by the public.
`
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.14. The Board must find “good cause” to seal documents.
`
`Garmin v. Cuozzo, IPR2012-00001, Paper 36 at 3 (PTAB April 5, 2013). “The
`
`rules aim to strike a balance between the public’s interest in maintaining a
`
`complete and understandable file history and the parties’ interest in protecting truly
`
`sensitive information.” The Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`
`
`-1-
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-00712
`Patent 8,927,592
`
`The public’s interest in having access to a party’s confidential business or
`
`clinical research information that is only indirectly related to patent validity is
`
`“minimal.” Garmin at 8-9 (granting the patent owner’s motion to seal an
`
`agreement relating to the “commercializ[ation]” of the patent-at-issue). Here, good
`
`cause supports Petitioner’s filing of the Reply in Support of Motion to Exclude
`
`under seal because Petitioner is thereby complying with the Stipulated Protective
`
`Order in this Proceeding. Stipulated Protective Order. Paper 36 at 4 (“Information
`
`designated as confidential that is disclosed to another party during discovery or
`
`other proceedings before the Board shall be clearly marked as ‘PROTECTIVE
`
`ORDER MATERIAL’ and shall be produced in a manner that maintains its
`
`confidentiality”).
`
`III. CERTIFICATION OF CONFERENCE WITH OPPOSING PARTY
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §42.54
`
`Counsel for Mylan has conferred with counsel for Aventis regarding the
`
`confidentiality of Exhibit 1042 and Papers 64 and 72.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`For the reasons provided above, Mylan requests that the Board permit
`
`Petitioner to file its Reply in Support of Motion to Exclude under seal.
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-00712
`Patent 8,927,592
`
`
`Date: May 19, 2017
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Steven W. Parmelee /
`Steven W. Parmelee
`Reg. No. 31,990
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-00712
`Patent 8,927,592
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`This is to certify that I caused to be served a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing Petitioner Mylan Laboratories Limited’s Motion to Seal, on this 19th
`
`day of May, 2017, on the Patent Owner at the correspondence address of the Patent
`
`Owner as follows:
`
`Dominick A. Conde
`William E. Solander
`Jason A. Leonard
`Whitney L. Meier
`Daniel J. Minion
`Joshua I. Rothman
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 1014-3800
`Email: dconde@fchs.com
`Email: wsolander@fchs.com
`Email: jleonard@fchs.com
`Email: wmeier@fchs.com
`Email: dminion@fchs.com
`Email: jrothman@fchs.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Steven W. Parmelee /
` Steven W. Parmelee, Lead Counsel
` Reg. No. 31,990
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 19, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket