throbber
mAbs 7:1, 9--14; January/February 2015; © 2015 BioProcess Technology Consultants, Inc.
`
`REVIEW
`
`The therapeutic monoclonal antibody market
`
`Dawn M Ecker, Susan Dana Jones, and Howard L Levine*
`
`BioProcess Technology Consultants, Inc.; Woburn, MA USA
`
`therapeutic
`the first
`Since the commercialization of
`monoclonal antibody product
`in 1986,
`this
`class of
`biopharmaceutical products has grown significantly so that,
`as of November 10, 2014, forty-seven monoclonal antibody
`products have been approved in the US or Europe for the
`treatment of a variety of diseases, and many of
`these
`products have also been approved for other global markets.
`At the current approval rate of » four new products per year,
`»70 monoclonal antibody products will be on the market by
`2020, and combined world-wide sales will be nearly $125
`billion.
`
`Introduction
`
`The commercial development of therapeutic monoclonal anti-
`bodies commenced in the early 1980s, and by 1986 the first ther-
`apeutic monoclonal antibody, Orthoclone OKT3, was approved
`for prevention of kidney transplant rejection. Since the approval
`of OKT3, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and antibody-
`related products such as Fc-fusion proteins, antibody fragments,
`and antibody-drug conjugates (collectively referred to hereafter
`as monoclonal antibody products) have grown to become the
`dominant product class within the biopharmaceutical market.
`Monoclonal antibody products today are approved for the treat-
`ment of a variety of diseases, ranging from those that treat patient
`populations of a few thousand or less for such orphan indications
`as paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria or
`the cryopyrin-
`associated periodic syndromes to those treating hundreds of
`thousands of patients for some cancers and multiple sclerosis or
`even millions of patients for diseases such as asthma and rheuma-
`toid arthritis.
`
`Growth of the Monoclonal Antibody Market
`
`Following the approval of the first monoclonal antibody prod-
`uct in 1986, sales growth and approval of additional products
`was slow until the late 1990s when the first chimeric monoclonal
`antibodies were approved. With the approval of these products,
`followed by the approval of humanized and then fully human
`monoclonal antibodies, the rate of product approvals and sales of
`monoclonal antibody products has increased dramatically so that
`
`*Correspondence to: Howard L Levine; Email: hlevine@bptc.com
`Submitted: 09/16/2014; Revised: 11/03/2014; Accepted: 11/12/2014
`http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19420862.2015.989042
`
`in 2013, global sales revenue for all monoclonal antibody prod-
`ucts was nearly $75 billion,1 representing approximately half of
`the total sales of all biopharmaceutical products. The continued
`growth in sales of the currently approved monoclonal antibody
`products, along with the over 300 monoclonal antibody product
`candidates currently in development, many for multiple indica-
`tions,1,2 will result in continued growth in sales of monoclonal
`antibody products in the coming years and will continue to drive
`the overall sales of all biopharmaceutical products.
`As shown in Figure 1, the number of monoclonal antibody
`products approved for commercial sale in the US and Europe has
`grown steadily, with three to five new products approved per year
`for the last several years. While a total of fifty-eight monoclonal
`antibody products have been approved in Europe and/or the US
`since 1986, eleven of these products have been withdrawn for
`various reasons, leaving forty-four approved monoclonal anti-
`body products currently on the market (Table 1). Of the forty-
`seven monoclonal antibody products approved and marketed in
`the United States and Europe as of November 10, 2014,1,3,4
`three are produced in E. coli while all of the other products are
`produced in mammalian cells. Of the products produced in
`mammalian cell culture, thirty-one are full-length naked mono-
`clonal antibodies; one is a bispecific antibody, two are antibody-
`drug conjugates, one is a radio-labelled antibody conjugate, one
`is an antigen-binding fragment (Fab), and eight are Fc‑fusion
`proteins containing the antibody constant
`region fused to
`another non-antibody-related protein domain. Two of the three
`products produced in E. coli are Fabs while the third is an Fc-
`fusion protein. Of the full length monoclonal antibodies, we con-
`sider Prolia and Xgeva as two separate products even though they
`are manufactured from the same biologically active substance.
`This decision is based on the fact that Prolia and Xgeva are pre-
`sented in different formulations and container/closure systems,
`and separate Biological License Applications (not Supplemental
`Applications) were filed in the US for each. The list of forty-seven
`approved monoclonal antibody products also includes the first
`biosimilar monoclonal antibodies approved in Europe, Inflectra
`and Remsima. The bulk monoclonal antibody used to produce
`these biosimilars is manufactured by a single supplier (Celltrion),
`however, we consider them as separate products since the final
`drug product for each is manufactured by a separate entity and
`two separate manufacturers are responsible for final batch release
`of the products. Furthermore, separate European Marketing
`Authorization Applications were submitted for each product.
`Based on a review of historical success and turnover rates (i.e.,
`the length of time required for a product to move from one stage
`of development to the next) of biopharmaceutical product devel-
`
`www.tandfonline.com
`
`mAbs
`
`9
`
`opment candidates, »26% of the monoclonal antibody products
`Mylan v. Genentech
`IPR2016-00710
`Genentech Exhibit 2135
`
`

`

`tons of all other recombinant protein products. The demand for
`monoclonal antibody products has resulted in a significant
`amount of global manufacturing capacity devoted to their pro-
`duction as well as to significant improvements in methods and
`approaches
`to monoclonal antibody manufacturing process
`design and optimization.8-12
`The forty-seven monoclonal antibody products on the market
`in the US and Europe as of November 10, 2014 are listed in
`Table 1. In 2013, eighteen of these monoclonal antibody prod-
`ucts (Humira, Remicade, Enbrel, Rituxan, Avastin, Herceptin,
`Lucentis, Erbitux, Synagis, Eylea, Soliris, Tysabri, Stelara, Xolair,
`Orencia, Simponi, Actemra, and Xgeva) achieved annual sales of
`over $1 billion, while six of these products (Humira, Remicade,
`Enbrel, Rituxan, Avastin, Herceptin) had sales of greater than
`$6 billion. Humira, recorded sales of nearly $11 billion, the high-
`est sales figure ever recorded for a biopharmaceutical product.
`To further highlight the growth in sales of monoclonal anti-
`body products during the last ten years, the sales growth profiles
`of the top six selling monoclonal antibody products (Humira,
`Remicade, Enbrel, Rituxan, Avastin, Herceptin) are compared to
`those of the two top-selling, recombinant protein products pro-
`duced in mammalian cell culture (the cytokines Avonex and
`Rebif) in Figure 3. The average compound annual growth rate
`for these six monoclonal antibody products over this period is
`20% while that of the two mature recombinant protein products
`was essentially flat.
`Based on a review of historical sales data, company annual
`reports, and sales projection data collected by BioProcess Tech-

`database, we
`nology Consultants in our proprietary bioTRAK
`forecast that the monoclonal antibody market will continue to
`grow at a CAGR of 8% or more for the next several years. At this
`growth rate, sales of currently approved monoclonal antibodies
`plus sales from new products approved in the coming years will
`drive the world-wide sales of monoclonal antibody products to
`
`»$94 billion by 2017 and nearly $125 billion by 2020. Our pro-
`
`jections are consistent with those of others, such as a recent report
`from BCC Research that predicts the market for monoclonal
`antibody products will be nearly $90 billion by 2017.13
`
`Factors Contributing to Growth of the Monoclonal
`Antibody Market
`
`The continued interest in antibody product development is
`partially driven by the rapid advancement of our understanding
`of disease at a molecular level. Although failing to meet some
`observers’ initial high expectations, genomics, proteomics and
`other systems biology tools continue, in fact, to provide impor-
`tant new targets for modulating disease.14 Monoclonal antibody
`products often provide the most rapid route to a clinical proof-
`of-concept for activating, inhibiting, or blocking these new tar-
`gets. Since the production of most monoclonal antibody prod-
`ucts is easily amenable to efficient platform-based approaches
`and antibodies are generally well-tolerated and highly specific,
`the risk of unexpected safety issues in human clinical trials of
`monoclonal antibody products is lower than with many other
`
`Figure 1. Annual approvals of monoclonal antibody products.3,4 The
`number of monoclonal antibody products first approved for commercial
`sale in the US or Europe each year since 1982 is shown. The totals
`include all monoclonal antibody and antibody-related products. Prod-
`ucts approved but subsequently removed from the market are denoted
`in blue; products currently marketed are denoted in green. 2014 total is
`as of November 10, 2014.
`
`entering Phase 2 human clinical trials in recent years will ulti-
`mately achieve market approval with an average time from the
`
`start of Phase 2 clinical trials to approval of » seven years.5-7
`
`Given the large number of monoclonal antibody candidates cur-
`rently in development, we expect that the number of products
`approved each year for the coming years will be approximately
`the same or more than it has been for the last several years. In
`fact, as of November 10, six monoclonal antibody products were
`granted first approvals in 2014, with approval decisions for at
`least two additional products likely to be announced by the end
`of this year. Based on an approval rate of approximately four
`monoclonal antibody products per year, we anticipate that there
`will be 70 or more monoclonal antibody products on the market
`by 2020.
`Along with a higher approval rate than other biopharmaceuti-
`cal products, global sales of monoclonal antibody products have
`grown faster than these other products for the past five years.
`Figure 2 shows the breakdown of sales for monoclonal antibody
`products based on the product type (e.g., full length antibody,
`antibody conjugate, antibody fragment, etc.) and production sys-
`tem (e.g., mammalian cell culture, microbial fermentation). As
`seen from these data, sales of all monoclonal antibody products,
`
`regardless of the production system, have grown from »$39 bil-
`
`lion in 2008 to almost $75 billion in 2013, a 90% increase. By
`comparison, sales of other recombinant protein therapeutics have
`
`only increased »26% in the same time period.
`
`Corresponding to the increasing sales of monoclonal antibody
`products, there has been an increase in the total quantities of
`these products produced annually to meet the market demand.
`As shown in Figure 2, nearly 10 metric tons of monoclonal anti-
`
`body products were produced in 2013 compared to »8.6 metric
`
`10
`
`mAbs
`
`Volume 7 Issue 1
`
`

`

`(continuedonnextpage)
`
`1,030
`389
`1,527
`1,887
`NoMe
`1,504
`1,551
`30v
`1,432
`7,500
`127
`<1m
`
`5
`
`8,944
`824
`352
`1,444
`
`26
`427
`4,205
`
`3
`
`NoMe
`252
`<1m
`119
`
`10,659
`6,559
`
`3
`
`1,851
`1,926
`NoMe
`8,325
`NoMe
`NoMe
`789
`228
`6,748
`117
`17
`
`NoMe
`253
`1,119
`
`23
`
`2010
`2006
`2004
`1998
`2014
`2009
`2007
`1998
`2009
`1997
`1994
`2013
`2009
`1998
`2011
`2012
`2005
`2011
`2008
`2006
`2013
`2014
`2013
`2013
`2009
`2002
`1998
`2013
`2011
`2004
`2014
`1998
`2014
`2014
`2008
`2011
`2004
`2009
`2008
`2014
`2011
`2009
`2012
`
`GlobalSales($M)a
`
`2013
`
`Approval
`
`YearofFirst
`
`Amgen
`Amgen
`
`BiogenIdec
`
`Abbvie
`
`Johnson&Johnson
`Johnson&Johnson
`
`AlexionPharmaceuticals
`NovartisPharmaceuticals
`
`Merck&Co.
`
`Roche
`N/A
`
`Celltrion
`
`NeoPharmGroup
`
`Merck&Co.
`
`GlaxoSmithKline
`
`Roche
`
`Bristol-MyersSquibb
`Bristol-MyersSquibb
`
`Amgen
`
`NovartisPharmaceuticals
`
`Sanofi
`N/A
`Roche
`Hospira
`
`NovartisPharmaceuticals
`
`AbbVie
`Roche
`Roche
`
`BayerHealthcarePharmaceuticals
`
`MerckKGaA
`
`TakedaPharmaceuticalCo.
`
`Pfizer
`N/A
`N/A
`UCB
`
`GlaxoSmithKline
`
`Roche
`
`GlaxoSmithKline
`
`N/A
`N/A
`
`TakedaPharmaceuticalCo.
`
`Roche
`N/Ab
`
`Sales
`
`ReportingEU
`
`Company
`
`Amgen
`Amgen
`
`Roche
`Lilly
`N/A
`N/A
`
`Amgen
`Roche
`
`Amgen
`Roche
`N/A
`
`Roche
`N/A
`
`AbbVie
`Roche
`Roche
`
`Amgen
`
`UCB
`
`Roche
`
`Roche
`
`Company
`
`BiogenIdec
`AstraZeneca
`
`Johnson&Johnson
`Johnson&Johnson
`
`AlexionPharmaceuticals
`NovartisPharmaceuticals
`
`Johnson&Johnson
`
`Johnson&Johnson
`
`Bristol-MyersSquibb
`Bristol-MyersSquibb
`
`Merck&Co.
`
`NovartisPharmaceuticals
`
`Amgen
`Amgen
`
`BiogenIdec
`
`AbbottLaboratories
`
`JanssenBiotech
`
`Janssen-CilagInternational
`AlexionPharmaceuticals
`NovartisPharmaceuticals
`CentocorOrthoBiotech
`
`Genentech
`Centocor
`Celltrion
`
`FreseniusBiotech
`
`Centocor
`Amgen
`
`Genentech
`
`Bristol-MyersSquibb
`Bristol-MyersSquibb
`
`Amgen
`
`Genentech
`
`GenzymeTherapeutics
`
`Merck&Co.
`Genentech
`
`Hospira
`
`NovartisPharmaceuticals
`
`AbbottLaboratories
`
`Genentech
`Genentech
`
`RegeneronPharmaceuticals
`
`RegeneronPharmaceuticals
`
`Bristol-MyersSquibb
`
`ImCloneSystems
`
`TakedaPharmaceuticalCo.
`
`TakedaPharmaceuticalsU.S.A.,Inc
`
`BiogenIdec
`
`EliLillyandCo.
`
`Immunex
`BiogenIdec
`
`EliLillyandCo.
`
`UCB
`
`GlaxoSmithKline
`
`HumanGenomeSciences
`
`GlaxoSmithKline
`
`Genentech
`
`GlaxoSmithKline
`
`RegeneronPharmaceuticals
`
`RegeneronPharmaceuticals
`
`BiogenIdec
`
`SeattleGenetics
`
`BiogenIdec
`
`SeattleGenetics
`
`Roche
`
`GlaxoSmithKline
`
`HumanGenomeSciences
`
`ReportingUSSales
`
`Applicant
`BLA/MAA
`Original
`
`Xgevas(denosumab)
`Vectibix(panitumumab)
`Tysabri(natalizumab)
`Synagis(palivizumab)
`Sylvant(siltuximab)
`Stelara(ustekinumab)
`Soliris(eculizumab)
`Simulect(basiliximab)
`Simponi/SimponiAria(golimumab)
`Rituxan(rituximab)
`ReoProu(abciximab)
`Remsimakl(infliximab[biosimilar])
`Removabt(catumaxomab)
`Remicade(infliximab)
`Prolias(denosumab)
`Perjeta(pertuzumab)
`Orenciar(abatacept)
`Nulojixq(belatacept)
`Nplatep(romiplostim)
`Lucentiso(ranibizumab)
`Lemtrada(alemtuzumab)
`Keytruda(pembrolizumab)
`Kadcylan(ado-trastuzumabemtansine)
`Inflectrakl(infliximab[biosimilar])
`Ilaris(canakinumab)
`Humira(adalimumab)
`Herceptin(trastuzumab)
`Gazyva(obinutuzumab)
`Eyleaj(aflibercept)
`Erbitux(cetuximab)
`Entyvio(vedolizumab)
`Enbreli(etanercept)
`Eloctateh(FactorVIIIFcfusionprotein)
`Cyramza(ramucirumab)
`Cimziag(certolizumabpegol)
`Benlysta(belimumab)
`Avastin(bevacizumab)
`Arzerra(ofatumumab)
`Arcalystf(rilonacept)
`AlprolIXd(FactorIXFcfusionprotein)
`Adcetrisc(brentuximabvedotin)
`Actemra(tocilizumab)
`Abthrax(raxibacumab)
`
`Brandname(INN)
`
`Table1.Marketedtherapeuticmonoclonalantibodyproducts
`
`www.tandfonline.com
`
`mAbs
`
`11
`
`

`

`xAntibodyConjugate,Y-90.
`wFcFusionProtein,Fc-VEGFR.
`vFab,producedbypapaindigestionoffulllengthmonoclonalantibody.
`uSalesdatanotdisclosed,smallpatientmarket,bioTRAKÒestimateofglobalsales.
`tBispecific,Tri-functionalAntibody.
`sProliaandXgevaareconsideredastwoindividualproductseventhoughtheycontainthesamebulkmonoclonalantibody;seetext.
`rFcFusionProtein,Fc-CTLA-4.
`qFcFusionProtein,Fc-CTLA-4withaminoacidsubstitutions.
`pFcFusionProtein,Fc-TPO-Rbindingpeptide(producedbymicrobialfermentation).
`oFab(producedbymicrobialfermentation).
`nAntibody-DrugConjugate,DM1.
`mProductapprovalinlate2013;noannualsalesdisclosed,bioTRAKÒestimateofglobalsales.
`lInflectraandRemsimaareconsideredastwoindividualproducts;seetext.
`kBiosimilarAntibody,RemicadeOriginator.
`jFcFusionProtein,Fc-VEGFR(1,2).
`iFcFusionProtein,Fc-TNFR(p75).
`hFcFusionProtein,Fc-FactorVIII.
`gFabConjugate,PEG(producedbymicrobialfermentation).
`fFcFusionProtein,Fc-IL1R.
`eProductapprovalin2014;nosalesin2013.
`dFcFusionProtein,Fc-FactorIX.
`cAntibody-DrugConjugate,MMAE.
`bN/Adenoteproductnotavailableinthisregion.
`aSalesinformationobtainedfromcompanyannualreportsandotherpublicallyavailablesources.
`
`29
`70
`960
`1,465
`
`2002
`2012
`2011
`2003
`
`GlobalSales($M)a
`
`2013
`
`Approval
`
`YearofFirst
`
`SpectrumPharmaceuticals
`
`SpectrumPharmaceuticals
`
`Sanofi
`
`Bristol-MyersSquibb
`
`Novartis
`
`Sales
`
`ReportingEU
`
`Company
`
`Sanofi
`
`Bristol-MyersSquibb
`
`Roche
`
`ReportingUSSales
`
`Company
`
`IDECPharmaceuticals
`
`SanofiAventis
`
`Bristol-MyersSquibb
`
`Genentech
`
`Applicant
`BLA/MAA
`Original
`
`Zevalinx(ibritumomabtiuxetan)
`Zaltrapw(ziv-aflibercept)
`Yervoy(ipilimumab)
`Xolair(omalizumab)
`
`Brandname(INN)
`
`Table1.Marketedtherapeuticmonoclonalantibodyproducts(Continued)
`
`12
`
`mAbs
`
`Volume 7 Issue 1
`
`

`

`types of therapeutic products. Therefore,
`for many of these novel targets, mono-
`clonal antibody products are often the
`first product candidates advancing to
`clinical
`trials. If
`the initial proof-of-
`concept studies with these products are
`successful,
`they
`can move
`rapidly
`towards commercialization, providing a
`“first-to-market” advantage.
`Also fueling the growth in monoclo-
`nal antibody product sales is the global
`market expansion of the pharmaceutical
`market in general resulting from the
`increasing and aging worldwide popula-
`tion and the increasing standard of living
`in emerging markets.15 In addition, the
`continued evaluation of monoclonal
`antibody products in new and expanded
`clinical indications results in continued
`demand for product for clinical studies
`subsequent
`sales
`in newly approved
`indications.
`As the biopharmaceutical industry
`matures,
`the number and types of
`diseases
`that will be
`economically
`treated with monoclonal
`antibody
`products will increase. Driven in part
`by the need for cost-effective supply
`of
`large quantities of products
`for
`such
`cost-sensitive
`indications
`as
`rheumatology and asthma,16 recent improvements in mono-
`clonal antibody production technologies have substantially
`improved process yields and reduced actual manufacturing
`
`Figure 2. Sales of biopharmaceutical products by product type. Total annual sales of biopharmaceuti-
`cal products are shown as a function of product type. Note that recombinant proteins produced by
`microbial fermentation include recombinant human insulin products which represent nearly 50% of
`the sales and >90% of the material produced in this category.
`
`costs.17-20 As a result, there is an ever-increasing opportu-
`nity for these products to penetrate more cost-sensitive indi-
`cations and markets.
`As the patents providing exclusive rights to many of the
`high-profile and blockbuster monoclonal antibody products
`expire, there has been a growing interest in the development
`of biosimilars. In September 2013, the first biosimilar mono-
`clonal antibodies, sold under the brand names Remsima and
`Inflectra, were approved for commercial
`sale in Europe.
`These biosimilar versions of the blockbuster monoclonal anti-
`body product Remicade are the first of many biosimilar
`monoclonal antibodies that will undoubtedly be approved for
`commercial sale in the US and Europe. Although the current
`impact of these and other biosimilar monoclonal antibody
`products in US and European biopharmaceutical marketplace
`cannot be gauged at this early stage, we anticipate modest
`acceleration of the sales growth of all monoclonal antibodies
`as these biosimilar products gain market acceptance. There is
`also a surging interest in biosimilar monoclonal antibodies in
`the global markets of Latin America, China, Southeast Asia,
`India, and Russia, with several monoclonal antibody products
`already approved in these regions. The introduction of biosi-
`milars in these markets is likely to have a very large impact
`on the global sales of monoclonal antibody products as biosi-
`milar monoclonal antibodies are approved in geographies that
`are currently unable to access expensive innovator products.
`
`Figure 3. Annual sales of monoclonal antibody products. Annual sales of
`the top six selling monoclonal antibodies compared to the non-antibody
`recombinant proteins Avonex and Rebif for the period 2004 to 2013.
`Each monoclonal antibody product had 2013 sales of greater than
`$6.5 billion. Sales information was obtained from company annual
`reports and other publically available sources.
`
`www.tandfonline.com
`
`mAbs
`
`13
`
`

`

`Conclusion
`
`As the development and commercialization of monoclonal
`antibody products continues with no limit in sight,
`lessons
`learned from the early monoclonal antibody product develop-
`ment, along with the use of advanced and novel technologies for
`their production and the increasing familiarity of global
`
`regulatory authorities with therapeutic monoclonal antibody
`products, will contribute to their continued dominance as the
`major class of biopharmaceutical products worldwide.
`
`Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
`
`No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
`
`References
`[Internet].
`Technology Consultants
`1. Bioprocess
`Woburn (MA): Bioprocess Technology Consultants,

`database; 2014 [cited 2014 September
`Inc. bioTRAK
`14]; [about 2 screens]. Available from: http://www.
`bptc.com/pipeline-databases.php
`2. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of Amer-
`ica. Medicines in development: Biologics 2013 Report
`[Internet]. Washington, DC: Pharmaceutical Research
`and Manufacturers of America; 2013 Mar [cited 2014
`September 14]. 87 p. Available from: http://www.
`phrma.org/sites/default/files/pdf/biologics2013.pdf
`3. Drugs@FDA [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): U.S.
`Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Eval-
`uation and Research. 1939- [cited 2014 September
`14]. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
`scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm
`4. European public assessment reports, human medicines
`[Internet]. London: The European Medicines Agency.
`1995 [cited 2014 September 14]. Available from: http://
`www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/
`landing/epar_search.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124
`5. Ecker DM, Ransohoff TC, Jones SD, Levine HL. The
`state of mammalian cell culture biomanufacturing.
`Woburn (MA): BioProcess Technology Consultants,
`Inc; 2011 Dec 12; 150 p. Available from: http://www.
`bptc.com/ECommerce/Reports.
`6. DiMasi JA, Feldman L, Seckler A, Wilson A. Trends in
`risks associated with new drug development: success
`rates for investigational drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther
`2010; 87(3):272-7; PMID:20130567
`7. Pavlou AK, Reichert JM. Recombinant protein thera-
`peutics-success rates, market trends and values to 2010.
`
`2004;
`
`22(12):1513-9;
`
`Biotechnol
`Nat
`PMID:15583654
`8. Greb E, Drakulich A. Platform technologies. Pharma-
`ceutical Technol 2012; 36(3):46-52.
`9. Rameez S, Mostafa SS, Miller C, Shukla AA. High-
`throughput miniaturized bioreactors for cell culture
`process development: reproducibility, scalability, and
`control. Biotechnol
`Prog
`2014;
`30(3):718-27;
`PMID:24449637
`10. Bhambure R, Kumar K, Rathore AS. High throughput
`process development for biopharmaceutical drug sub-
`stances. Trends
`in Biotech 2011; 29(3):127-35;
`PMID:21255855
`11. Chollangi S, et al. Accelerating purification process
`development of an early phase MAb with high-
`throughput automation. Part 1. Bioprocess Int 2014;
`12(3):48-52.
`12. Chollangi S, et al. Accelerating purification process
`development of an early phase MAb with high-
`throughput automation. Part 2. Bioprocess Int 2014;
`12(4):32-41.
`13. BCC Research. Biologic therapeutic drugs: technolo-
`gies and global markets. Wellesley (MA): BCC
`Research, LLC; 2013 Jan. 142 p. Available from:
`http://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/biotech
`nology/biologic-therapeutic-drugs-markets-bio079b.
`html
`14. Bilello JA. The agony and ecstasy of "OMIC" technolo-
`gies in drug development. Curr Mol Med 2005; 5
`(1):39-52; PMID:15720269
`15. United Nations Development Programme. Human
`development report 2013: The rise of
`the South:
`Human progress in a diverse world [Internet]. NY
`
`(NY): United Nations Development Programme;
`c2013 [cited 2014 September 14]. 216 p. Available
`from:
`http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/
`14/hdr2013_en_complete.pdf
`16. Wurm FM. Production of recombinant protein thera-
`peutics in cultivated mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol
`2004; 22(11):1393-8; PMID:15529164
`17. Lu F, Toh PC, Burnett I, Li F, Hudson T, Amanullah
`A, Li J. Automated dynamic fed-batch process and
`media optimization for high productivity cell culture
`process development. Biotechnol Bioeng 2013; 110
`(1):191-205; PMID:22767053
`18. Yang WC, Lu J, Kwiatkowski C, Yuan H, Kshirsagar
`R, Ryll T, Huang YM. Perfusion seed cultures improve
`biopharmaceutical fed-batch production capacity and
`product quality. Biotechnol Prog 2014; 30(3):616-25;
`PMID:24574326
`19. Povey JF, O’Malley CJ, Root T, Martin EB, Montague
`GA, Feary M, Trim C, Lang DA, Alldread R, Racher
`AJ, Smales CM. Rapid high-throughput characteriza-
`tion, classification and selection of recombinant mam-
`malian cell line phenotypes using intact cell MALDI-
`ToF mass spectrometry fingerprinting and PLS-DA
`modelling. J Biotechnol 2014; 20(184):84-93.
`20. Liu B Spearman M, Doering J, Lattova E, Perreault H,
`Butler M. The availability of glucose to CHO cells
`affects the intracellular lipid-linked oligosaccharide dis-
`tribution, site occupancy and the N-glycosylation pro-
`file of a monoclonal antibody. J Biotechnol 2014;
`170:17-27; PMID:24286971
`
`14
`
`mAbs
`
`Volume 7 Issue 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket