throbber
D. R. Helinski et al. (eds.), Plasmids in Bacteria
`© Plenum Press, New York 1985
`
`Mylan v. Genentech
`IPR2016-00710
`Genentech Exhibit 2079
`
`

`
`if
`
`|i.il.iilPEliL
`
`if
`
`|i.il.iilPEliL
`
`if
`
`|i.il.iilPEliL
`
`if
`
`|i.il.iilPEliL
`
`the stahle ntegration of these proeoter classes (ii, ani it hecane
`olnions that ntense trnscriptlonal activities can notices in
`canine reps nith plrsnil nantenaoce ani strocnal stahilitp.
`to
`foreclose constrnctei i lnilies of plrsnil rectors nhich not onlp
`ailon no to stahlp ntegrate pronoters nlepenientlp of
`their
`strength, int also enabled to to ilentifp none of the prohlens nhich
`iecrilp traoscnihci regions can one to folll-tppe rector spstens
`(ill.
`
`iheprioipleoflnesepiannilspstensisshonn nPig.lani
`their in properties are leccrlhel in the correspnlng legenl.
`
`the stahle ntegration of these proeoter classes (ii, ani it hecane
`olnions that ntense trnscriptlonal activities can interfere in
`canine reps nith plrsnil nantenaoce ani strocnal stahilitp.
`to
`foreclose constrnctei i lnilies of plrsnil rectors nhich not onlp
`ailon no
`to stahlp ntegrate pronoters nlepenientlp of
`their
`strength, int also enabled to to ilentifp none of the prohlens nhich
`iecrilp traoscnihci regions can one to folll-tppe rector spstens
`(fl).
`
`iheprioipleoflnesepiannilspstensisshonn nPig.lani
`their in properties are leccrlhel in the correspnlng legenl.
`
`the stahle ntegration of these proeoter classes (ii, ani it hecane
`olnions that
`intense transcriptional activities can interfere in
`canine reps nith plrsnil nantenaoce ani strocnal stahilitp.
`to
`foreclose constrnctei i lnilies of plrsnil rectors nhich not onlp
`ailon no to stahlp integrate pronoters nlepenientlp of
`their
`strength, int also enabled to to ilentifp none of the prohlens nhich
`iecrilp traoscnihci regions can one to folll-tppe rector spstens
`(fl).
`
`iheprioipleoflnesepiannilspstensisshonn nPig.lani
`their in properties are leccrlhel in the correspnlng legenl.
`
`the stahle ntegration of these proeoter classes (ii, ani it hecane
`olnions that
`intense transcriptional activities can interfere in
`canine reps nith plrsnil nantenaoce ani strocnal stahilitp.
`to
`foreclose constrnctei i lnilies of plrsnil rectors nhich not onlp
`ailon no to stahlp integrate pronoters nlepenientlp of
`their
`strength, int also enabled to to ilentifp none of the prohlens nhich
`iecrilp traoscnihci regions can one to folll-tppe rector spstens
`(fl).
`
`iheprioipleoflnesepiannilspstensisshonn nPig.lani
`their in properties are leccrlhel in the correspnlng legenl.
`
`Mp inner and Plasnil ilcintenance
`
`Mp inner and Plasnil ilcintenance
`
`Mp inner and Plasnil ilcintenance
`
`Mp inner and Plasnil ilcintenance
`
`the cloong of nations
`(Pig. i) pernittel
`Pie pilll rector
`phage if pronoters (ll. honor,
`those font to he not efficient
`nritro cppeacel to be either not clonahio or thep cancel a lrastic
`selection in the copp nnnoer, often accospanici rith the non of the
`tire planil npon prolongei propagation of tie host cells.
`since
`the reason for this phenonenon sold here heeo an oerproinctin of
`M gene prolots as cell as a possible transcriptional roalthtongi
`nto the replication region, as leoelopel
`the pill plasnii fnilp
`(f). on teen shonn (l), ntegration of a M i into on the
`M if site of plliii (nhich destroys the ooing sentence of
`the
`iii-proton (ill ncceasei the piannil copp men i- to l-foll, n-
`licatiog that a possible noerpnolotio of (iris regnlator protenhp
`resltnongh iron npatrean pronoters can relate plaonil copp nnher
`ani nnhsegnent sentence. This is lennstratel hest hp the fact
`that ii pronto P
`I is stahlp nantainel in poll, alheit at a re-
`lncoi coppnonier ((
`. i(. nsertionof an efficient terninatnr at
`site 1 no i of post
`(Pig. 1], hoaener, ncreases the copp nnnler
`again (Pig. 2], sharing that
`transcriptional
`realthrongh into the
`replication region hp itself has a profound effect on plrsnil rep
`licatin.
`in have not onalpnoi nlether this is no to an orerpro
`lnctioo of hill (ii, a possible 'nenranil' nterfereoce rith the
`trnscriptnnal colt for in ii (ii, on hotl.
`
`Strong tranoriptinal rosithrnngh no the replication region
`tonarls the price proeoter (prolong til it, let. i) also niec-
`feres rith plasnil replication.
`listens pronoters no to in lines the
`efliciencp of the l-iactanase prnnoter (PW or P3, nlef. it
`he toieratel, sepnences shin cool this pronoter‘s efliciencp il-
`foll or one cannot stahlp he ntegratel in place of P
`nnlen con-
`ditions niece translation of
`l-nctanase n-iii nnnll
`teen in-
`
`pocsihle (i,il(.
`
`in srnnnanp, for the constnnction of highlp efficient transcrip
`tinal onits nitln pnsnii octorn carrping toiil-tppe replicons,
`it has to he talen nto accont that pronntec effiniencp has to he
`lhaiancel‘
`for
`the on to he stahlp nantainei.
`i'nis can he
`achieoel heat hp nsertng colpstihle transcriptional signals, pre-
`ferahlp in ailition to repressihle proanter elenents.
`
`the cloong of nations
`(Pig. i) pernittel
`Pie pilll rector
`phage if pronoters (ll. honor,
`those font to he not efficient
`nritro cppeacel to be either not clonahio or thep cancel a lrastic
`selection in the copp nnnoer, often accospanici rith the non of the
`tire planil npon prolongei propagation of tie host cells.
`since
`the reason for this phenonenon sold here heeo an oerproinctin of
`M gene prolots as cell as a possible transcriptional roalthtongi
`nto the replication region, as leoelopel
`the pill plasnii fnilp
`(f). on teen shonn (l), ntegration of a M i into on the
`M if site of plliii (nhich destroys the ooing sentence of
`the
`iii-proton (ill ncceasei the piannil copp men i- to l-foll, n-
`licatiog that a possible noerpnolotio of (iris regnlator protenhp
`resltnongh iron npatrean pronoters can relate plaonil copp nnher
`ani nnhsegnent sentence. This is lennstratel hest hp the fact
`that ii pronto P
`I is stahlp nantainel in poll, alheit at a re-
`lncoi coppnonier (fag. i(. nsertionof an efficient terninatnr at
`site 1 no i of post
`(Pig. 1], hoaener,
`increases the copp nnnler
`again (Pig. 2], sharing that
`transcriptional
`realthrongh into the
`replication region hp itself has a profound effect on plrsnil rep
`licatin.
`in have not onalpnoi nlether this is no to an orerpro
`lnctioo of hill (ii, a possible 'nenranil' interference rith the
`transcriptional colt for in ii (ii, on hotl.
`
`Strong tranoriptinal rosithrnngh no the replication region
`tonarls the price proeoter (prolong til it, let. i) also niec-
`feces rith plasnil replicatnn.
`listens pronoters no to in lines the
`efliciencp of the l-iactanase prnnoter (PW or P3, nlef. it
`he toieratel, sepnences shin cool this pronoter‘s efliciencp il-
`foll or one cannot stahlp he ntegratel in place of P
`nnlen con-
`ditions niece translation of
`l-nctanase n-iii nnnll
`teen in-
`
`pocsihle (i,il(.
`
`in srnnnanp, for the constnnction of highlp efficient transcrip
`tinal onits nitln pnsnii octorn carrping toiil-tppe replicons,
`it has to he talen nto accont that pronntec effiniencp has to he
`lhaiancel‘
`for
`the on to he stahlp nantainei.
`i'nis can he
`achieoel heat hp nsertng colpstihle transcriptional signals, pre-
`ferahlp in ailition to repressihle proanter elenents.
`
`the cloong of nations
`(Pig. i) pernittel
`Pie pilll rector
`phage if pronoters (ll. honor,
`those font to he not efficient
`nritro cppeacel to be either not clonahio or thep cancel a lrastic
`selection in the copp nnnoer, often accospanici rith the non of the
`tire planil npon prolongei propagation of tie host cells.
`since
`the reason for this phenonenon sold here heeo an oerproinctin of
`M gene prolots as cell as a possible transcriptional roalthtongi
`nto the replication region, as leoelopel
`the pill plasnii fnilp
`(f). on teen shonn (l), ntegration of a M i into on the
`M if site of plliii (nhich destroys the ooing sentence of
`the
`iii-proton (ill ncceasei the piannil copp men i- to l-foll, n-
`licatiog that a possible noerpnolotio of (iris regnlator protenhp
`resltnongh iron npatrean pronoters can relate plaonil copp nnher
`ani nnhsegnent sentence. This is lennstratel hest hp the fact
`that ii pronto P
`I is stahlp nantainel in poll, alheit at a re-
`lncoi coppnonier (fag. i(. nsertionof an efficient terninatnr at
`site 1 no i of post
`(Pig. 1], hoaener,
`increases the copp nnnler
`again (Pig. 2], sharing that
`transcriptional
`realthrongh into the
`replication region hp itself has a profound effect on plrsnil rep
`licatin.
`in have not onalpnoi nlether this is no to an orerpro
`lnctioo of hill (ii, a possible 'nenranil' nterfereoce rith the
`transcriptional colt for in ii (ii, on hotl.
`
`Strong tranoriptinal rosithrnngh no the replication region
`tonarls the price proeoter (prolong til it, let. i) also niec-
`feres rith plasnil replicatnn.
`listens pronoters no to in lines the
`efliciencp of the l-iactanase prnnoter (PW or P3, nlef. it
`is tolerated, sepnences shin cool this pronoter‘s efliciencp il-
`foll or one cannot stahlp he ntegratel in place of P
`nnlen con-
`ditions niece translation of
`l-nctanase n-iii nnnll
`teen in-
`
`pocsihle (i,il(.
`
`in srnnnanp, for the constnnction of highlp efficient transcrip
`tinal onits nitln pnsnii octorn carrping toiil-tppe replicons,
`it has to he talen nto accont that pronntec effiniencp has to he
`lhaiancel‘
`for
`the on to he stahlp nantainei.
`i'nis can he
`achieoel heat hp inserting colpstihle transcriptional signals, pre-
`ferahlp in ailition to repressihle proanter elenents.
`
`the cloong of nations
`(Pig. i) pernittel
`Pie pilll rector
`phage if pronoters (ll. honor,
`those font to he not efficient
`nritro cppeacel to be either not clonahio or thep cancel a lrastic
`selection in the copp nnnoer, often accospanici rith the non of the
`tire planil npon prolongei propagation of tie host cells.
`since
`the reason for this phenonenon sold here heeo an oerproinctin of
`M gene prolots as cell as a possible transcriptional roalthtongi
`nto the replication region, as leoelopel
`the pill plasnii fnilp
`(f). on teen shonn (l), ntegration of a M i into on the
`M if site of plliii (nhich destroys the ooing sentence of
`the
`iii-proton (ill ncceasei the piannil copp men i- to l-foll, n-
`licatiog that a possible noerpnolotio of (iris regnlator protenhp
`resltnongh iron npatrean pronoters can relate plaonil copp nnher
`ani nnhsegnent sentence. This is lennstratel hest hp the fact
`that ii pronto P
`I is stahlp nantainel in poll, alheit at a re-
`lncoi coppnonier ((
`. i(. nsertionof an efficient terninatnr at
`site 1 no i of post
`(Pig. 1], hoaener,
`increases the copp nnnler
`again (Pig. 2], sharing that
`transcriptional
`realthrongh into the
`replication region hp itself has a profound effect on plrsnil rep
`licatin.
`in have not onalpnoi nlether this is no to an orerpro
`lnctioo of hill (ii, a possible 'nenranil' nterfereoce rith the
`transcriptional colt for in ii (ii, on hotl.
`
`Strong tranoriptinal rosithrnngh no the replication region
`tonarls the price proeoter (prolong til it, let. i) also niec-
`feces rith plasnil replicatnn.
`listens pronoters no to in lines the
`efliciencp of the l-iactanase prnnoter (PW or P3, nlef. it
`is tolerated, sepnences shin cool this pronoter‘s efliciencp il-
`foll or one cannot stahlp he ntegratel in place of P
`nnlen con-
`ditions niece translation of
`l-nctanase n-iii nnnll
`teen in-
`
`pocsihle (i,il(.
`
`in srnnnanp, for the constnnction of highlp efficient transcrip
`tinal onits nitln pnsnii octorn carrping toiil-tppe replicons,
`it has to he talen nto accont that pronntec effiniencp has to he
`lhaiancel‘
`for
`the on to he stahlp nantainei.
`i'nis can he
`achieoel heat hp nsertng colpstihle transcriptional signals, pre-
`ferahlp in ailition to repressihle proanter elenents.
`
`

`
`llhhlllhllhflllhhiihhliihhlhcilfillli
`
`ll
`
`llhillllhllhflllhhiihhliihhlhcilfillli
`
`ll
`
`llhillllhllhflllhhiihhliihhlhcilfillli
`
`ll
`
`llhhlllhllhflllhhiihhliihhlhcilfillli
`
`ll
`
`Fig. l.
`
`
`
`hoth plas-
`ienetio ani phpsical nap oi phhlia ani phil.
`nhls contain 2 easilp assapahle inoctions nhioh can he
`hrooght sales the control oi a single pronotet (ll hnt
`nhich can also he seporatol hp tho insertion oi a terri-
`nator
`ii].
`lhese inoctions are lot
`the phi series:
`h-galactosihase actiritp (oia r-omplenentation at not
`tetracpcline resistance (too); for the pih series:
`tri-
`rethoprhne (oia hlhplrololate rohochase, hM anl chlor-
`mheoisoi
`(chinranphnricoi aoetpl transierase, M ra-
`sistarce.
`hoth plaonils coniet anpioillin resistance [oia
`i-lactnase, M and oarrp the iohil replication region
`of phiiii (M.
`imjor lilierence oi
`the i plnsnhl
`sperm is the presence oi
`the intact nap gene in phhlia
`and a second site for tho integration of a terninatoo
`[site i) in pill.
`l‘oe hireotion of transcription of the
`oohing sepoences is inlicatei.
`iositions and directions
`of trnscription for in ii (prison hill anl iii are
`representel hp cranes.
`lhe phpsioal rape of hoth plasnils
`are not honor to scale.
`integration of cnliphage fl ter-
`ninator into phhlia session in pihlh nhioh oas nsei
`ion
`the cloning of ooliphage hi proosotets ii).
`insertion of
`ternioators lihe t of ooliphage l (in) at site 1, ion at
`hoth sites nalesotlio piasnii an open letter cloning
`vehicle for pitlilti cloning.
`iroonters ash other signals
`conheplooeiinirontoftheM_rgnaeintooarioos
`restriction sites [onlp the Mi site is also here].
`honest the M gene carries its onnn translational initia-
`tion site,
`there is no translation of M-speciiiei
`nessage raises a ihhihtltl hiniing site has preoionslp
`heen fool to the M gene.
`
`Fig. l.
`
`
`
`hoth plas-
`ienetio ani phpsical nap oi phhlia ani phil.
`nhls contain 2 easilp assapahle inoctions nhioh can he
`hrooght sales the control oi a single pronotet (ll hnt
`nhich can also he seporatol hp the insertion oi a terri-
`nator
`ii].
`lhese inoctions are lot
`the phi series:
`h-galactosihase actiritp (oia r-omplenentation at not
`tetracpcline resistance (too); for the pih series:
`tri-
`rethoprhne (oia hlhplrololate rohochase, hM anl chlor-
`mheoisoi
`(chinranphnricoi aoetpl transierase, M ra-
`sistarce.
`hoth plaonils coniet anpioillin resistance [oia
`i-lactnase, M and oarrp the iohil replication region
`of phiiii (M.
`imjor lilierence oi
`the i plnsnhl
`sperm is the presence oi
`the intact nap gene in phhlia
`and a second site too the integration of a terninatoo
`[site i) in pill.
`l‘oe hireotion of transcription of the
`oohing sepoences is inlicatei.
`iositions and directions
`of trnscription for in ii (prison hill anl iii are
`representel hp cranes.
`lhe phpsioal rape of hoth plasnils
`are not honor to scale.
`integration of cnliphage fl ter-
`ninator into phhlia session in pihlh nhioh oas nsei
`ion
`the cloning of ooliphage hi proosotets ii).
`insertion of
`ternioators lihe t of ooliphage l (in) at site 1, ion at
`hoth sites nalesotlio piasnii an open letter cloning
`vehicle for pitlilti cloning.
`iroonters ash other signals
`conheplooeiinirontoftheM_rgnaeintooarioos
`restriction sites [onlp the Mi site is also here].
`honest the M gene carries its onnn translational initia-
`tion site,
`there is no translation of M-speciiiei
`nessage raises a ihhihtltl hiniing site has preoionslp
`heen fool to the M gene.
`
`Fig. l.
`
`
`
`hoth plas-
`ienetio ani phpsical nap oi phhlia ani phil.
`nhls contain 2 easilp assapahle inoctions nhioh can he
`hrooght sales the control oi a single pronotet (ll hnt
`nhich can also he seporatol hp the insertion oi a terri-
`nator
`ii].
`lhese inoctions are lot
`the phi series:
`h-galactosihase actiritp (oia r-omplenentation at not
`tetracpcline resistance (too); for the pih series:
`tri-
`rethoprhne (oia hlhplrololate rohochase, hM anl chlor-
`mheoisoi
`(chinranphnricoi aoetpl transierase, M ra-
`sistarce.
`hoth plaonils coniet anpioillin resistance [oia
`i-lactnase, M and oarrp the iohil replication region
`of phiiii (M.
`imjor lilierence oi
`the i plnsnhl
`sperm is the presence oi
`the intact nap gene in phhlia
`and a second site too the integration of a terninatoo
`[site i) in pill.
`l‘oe hireotion of transcription of the
`oohing sepoences is inlicatei.
`iositions and directions
`of trnscription for in ii (prison hill anl iii are
`representel hp cranes.
`lhe phpsioal rape of hoth plasnils
`are not honor to scale.
`integration of cnliphage fl ter-
`ninator into phhlia session in pihlh nhioh oas nsei
`ion
`the cloning of ooliphage hi proosotets ii).
`insertion of
`ternioators lihe t of ooliphage l (in) at site 1, ion at
`hoth sites nalesotlio piasnii an open letter cloning
`vehicle for pitlilti cloning.
`iroonters ash other signals
`conheplooeiinirontoftheM_rgnaeintooarioos
`restriction sites [onlp the Mi site is also here].
`honest the M gene carries its onnn translational initia-
`tion site,
`there is no translation of M-speciiiei
`nessage raises a ihhihtltl hiniing site has preoionslp
`heen fool to the M gene.
`
`Fig. l.
`
`
`
`hoth plas-
`ienetio ani phpsical nap oi phhlia ani phil.
`nhls contain 2 easilp assapahle inoctions nhioh can he
`hrooght sales the control oi a single pronotet (ll hnt
`nhich can also he seporatol hp the insertion oi a terri-
`nator
`ii].
`lhese inoctions are lot
`the phi series:
`h-galactosihase actiritp (oia r-omplenentation at not
`tetracpcline resistance (too); for the pih series:
`tri-
`rethoprhne (oia hlhplrololate rohochase, hM anl chlor-
`mheoisoi
`(chinranphnricoi aoetpl transierase, M ra-
`sistarce.
`hoth plaonils coniet anpioillin resistance [oia
`i-lactnase, M and oarrp the iohil replication region
`of phiiii (M.
`imjor lilierence oi
`the i plnsnhl
`sperm is the presence oi
`the intact nap gene in phhlia
`and a second site too the integration of a terninatoo
`[site i) in pill.
`l‘oe hireotion of transcription of the
`oohing sepoences is inlicatei.
`iositions and directions
`of transcription for in ii (prison hill anl iii are
`representel hp cranes.
`lhe phpsioal rape of hoth plasnils
`are not honor to scale.
`integration of cnliphage fl ter-
`ninator into phhlia session in pihlh nhioh oas nsei
`ion
`the cloning of ooliphage hi proosotets ii).
`insertion of
`ternioators lihe t of ooliphage l (in) at site 1, ion at
`hoth sites nalesotlio piasnii an open letter cloning
`vehicle for pitlilti cloning.
`iroonters ash other signals
`conheplooeiinirontoftheM_rgnaeintooarioos
`restriction sites [onlp the Mi site is also here].
`honest the M gene carries its onnn translational initia-
`tion site,
`there is no translation of M-speciiiei
`nessage raises a ihhihtltl hiniing site has preoionslp
`heen fool to the M gene.
`
`The inllnonce of ienninator losition on llasnil iinerination in piil
`
`The inllnonce of ienninator losition on llasnil iinerination in piil
`
`The inllnonce of ienninator losition on llasnil iinerination in piil
`
`The inllnonce of ienninator losition on llasnil iinerination in piil
`
`is shonn alone, placing the ternioator t
`in position 1 at h oi
`pihl escaping the phage ii proaoter hm ohestallishes the sopp
`rather to that of the prosnter-free plaanil ilig. ii. homer.
`in
`analpring the ratio of Iononerlc to iinerlc icons of the plasnii, it
`can he clearlp recognised that to inpositlon i increases the hllhti
`
`is shonn alone, placing the ternioator t
`in position 1 or i oi
`pihl escaping the phage ii proaoter hm ohestallishes the sopp
`rather to that of the prosnter-free plaanil ilig. ii. homer.
`in
`analpring the ratio of Iononerlc to iinerlc icons of the plasnii, it
`can he clearlp recognised that to inpositlon i increases the hllhti
`
`is shonn alone, placing the ternioator t
`in position 1 or i oi
`pihl escaping the phage ii proaoter hm ohestallishes the sopp
`rather to that of the prosnter-free plaanil ilig. ii. homer.
`in
`analpring the ratio of Iononerlc to iinerlc icons of the plasnii, it
`can he clearlp recognised that to inpositlon i increases the hllhti
`
`is shonn alone, placing the ternioator t
`in position 1 or i oi
`pihl escaping the phage ii proaoter hm ohestallishes the sopp
`rather to that of the prosnter-free plaanil ilig. ii. homer.
`in
`analpring the ratio of Iononerlc to iinerlc icons of the plasnii, it
`can he clearlp recognised that to inpositlon i increases the hllhti
`
`

`
`48
`
`H. BUJARD ET AL.
`
`
`
`Fig. 2.
`
`Electrophoretic analysis of pDS1 derivatives at various
`cell stages (for details, see Ref. 4).
`The roman numerals
`designate the nucleic acid preparations
`from cells of
`stage I to IV, M are concentration standards.
`The dupli-
`cate probes can be identified by the headings whereby the
`following abbreviations are used:
`P
`, coliphage T5 pro-
`moter P 07 inserted into the EcoRI site of pDS1 (Fig. 1);
`tol
`and tol
`describes the insertion of Ehe coliphage A
`terminator t
`at site 1
`in functional
`(1 ) and nonfunc-
`tional
`(1_) grientation, respectively;
`the same holds for
`:02
`and t 2 .
`The first band on the top of each gel re-
`presents thb dimeric,
`the lowest
`the monomeric form of the
`plasmid.
`In comparing the dimeric forms in stage II and
`stage IV,
`the influence of
`the positioning of
`t
`can be
`seen most clearly.
`
`0
`
`of dimeric structures. This is confirmed by the experiment shown in
`Fig. 3.
`Since it has been shown that multimerization decreases the
`maintenance of Co1E1-derived plasmids (11),
`these observations show
`that
`even such seemingly trivial
`topographic
`rearrangements of
`otherwise identical signals can affect
`the stable propagation of a
`vector. This result
`is puzzling in a special way:
`proposing that
`heavily transcribed regions may have some impact on a plasmid's rep-
`lication, a size reduction of this region by moving t
`from position
`2 to 1 would be expected to have the opposite effect.°
`
`Increase of Recombinational Events in Heavily Transcribed Regions
`
`We have constructed a pDS1 derivative containing 3 identical T5
`promoter sequences tandemly fused around 100 bp apart (12).
`Since a
`
`

`
`INSEHHONOFTRANSCmPWONALfl£MENTS
`
`49
`
`
`
`Fig. 3.
`
`Influence of the positioning of terminators on the dimeri—
`zation of pDS1.
`The different probes of
`the electropho-
`retic analysis in agarose gels can be identified by the
`heading of
`the figure.
`The promoter used is P2
`from
`coliophage T5.
`The
`increase in plasmid dimerizaglon in
`presence of P207 and terminator t
`in position 1
`(Fig. 1)
`is seen in lane 2 (from the left)P
`
`battery of 3 strong promoters was assumed to possibly create prob-
`lems,
`the promoters were previously fused to a
`lac operator se-
`quence.
`In addition,
`terminator t was placed in position 1 and no
`ribosomal binding site was presentoto allow the production of DHFR.
`This construct is perfectly stable if grown in the presence of suf-
`ficient
`amounts of
`lac repressor
`(Fig. 4).
`Upon induction with
`IPTG, colonies appear at high rates wherein the plasmid has lost one
`or 2 promoters by homologous recombination (evidenced by fine map-
`ping of restriction sites and sequence analysis). Transferring the
`plasmid into rec A or rec F strains markedly increased the stability
`of
`the construct
`(Fig. 4).
`There are 2
`interpretations to those
`results:
`
`- Increased intensity of transcription has an impact on the fre-
`quency of
`recombinational
`events whereby
`it
`is not clear
`whether
`the tandemly repeated promoter
`regions
`represent
`a
`special situation, or whether similar results can be obtained
`with tandemly repeated sequences
`further downstream of
`the
`transcriptional initiation sites.
`
`low frequency of elimination of promoters
`- There is a normal
`but, under condition of
`transcription, plasmids with less in-
`tense transcription (i.e.,
`lower promoter number) have a rep-
`licative advantage.
`
`the first interpretation, we have never observed
`In favor of
`differences
`in copy numbers between plasmids
`in which promoters
`differ severalfold in their efficiency-—as long as translation of
`the overproduced m-RNA and readthrough into the replication region
`is prevented.
`
`

`
`50
`
`H. BUJARD ET AL.
`
`
`
`Fig. 4.
`
`tandemly repeated promoter/operator con-
`a.
`Stability of
`struct.
`The upper part of the figure shows the electro-
`phoretic analysis (6% polyacrylamide) of pDSl containing
`t
`in position 1 (Fig. 1) and the triple promoter/operator
`cgnstruct shown in the lower part of the figure.
`The dis-
`tance between the promoter/operator
`regions
`is 100 bp.
`The host system and the conditions of growth (t
`IPTG) of
`the different plasmid isolates can be taken from the head-
`ings. At
`the left side the numbers of promoter/operator
`regions within the different isolates are indicated, which
`are
`600,
`400,
`or
`200 bp
`in length,
`respectively,
`as
`pointed out at the left side of the figure.
`The cultures
`were grown to OD600 9 2.0 in LB medium.
`
`Plasmid Carried Translational Initiation Signals and the Possible
`Limits of the Translational Capacity of the Host System
`
`insertion permits
`system carrying a proper promoter
`The pDSl
`quantification of different translational initiation signals by in-
`serting the unknown signal in front of the dhfr gene.
`The resulting
`polycistronic m—RNA (terminator in position 2) codes for 2 proteins:
`DHFR and CAT.
`Since the amount of CAT depends on its original
`translation initiation signal,
`the ratio of CAT to DHFR can be used
`to compare translation initiation signals of unknown activity (13).
`The products of both indicator genes (dhfr and cat) are tolerated by
`the cell in concentrations of up to 50% of the total soluble protein
`if only one of
`the genes is translated or up to 30% each if both
`gene products are allowed to be synthesized. Using this system, we
`have identified some unusually efficient
`translational
`initiation
`signals.
`Some of these, however, can only be cloned in presence of
`a
`strong promoter
`if an efficient
`transcriptional
`terminator
`is
`placed in position 2 of the plasmid (Fig. 1). Attempts to integrate
`
`

`
`lihillllliilillllliiiiiillliihlflillfllii
`
`hi
`
`lihillllliilillllliiiiiillliihlflillfllii
`
`hi
`
`lihillllliilillllliiiiiillliihlflillfllii
`
`hi
`
`lihillllliilillllliiiiiillliihlflillfllii
`
`hi
`
`terninator in
`on signals into plannils carrping the iieatical
`position i failel.
`hnr interpretation of these experience is that
`the axons of hill proincel onler these coalitions nap hearse tonic
`to the cell.
`lnaeoer.
`loaning stoichloetric accents of
`ill-
`rihosoaal hinling sites (omission in position i) cropeting rith
`the signal in front of the hits gene appears to allon the snrninal
`of the sell. Since nnier these coalitions arornl ill of the scalp
`spnthesinol proteins consist of it nsl hill, these esperisents seen
`to iniicate that, hp one of the proper expression signals inanlti-
`copp plasaila. at least in transiatinai ehinerp oi the host can
`he exhaoatei at certain stages of grnath.
`ionsepoantlp,
`the stable
`propagation of a plasnii can also iepnol on phpsinlogical parareters
`oi this tppe.
`
`terninator in
`on signals into plannils carrping the iieatical
`position i failel.
`hnr interpretation of these experience is that
`the axons of hill proincel onler these coalitions nap hearse tonic
`to the cell.
`lnaeoer.
`loaning stoichloetric accents of
`ill-
`rihosoaal hinling sites (omission in position i) cropeting rith
`the signal in front of the hits gene appears to allon the snrninal
`of the sell. Since nnier these coalitions arornl ill of the scalp
`spnthesinol proteins consist of it nsl hill, these esperisents seen
`to iniicate that, hp one of the proper expression signals inanlti-
`copp plasaila. at least in transiatinai ehinerp oi the host can
`he exhaoatei at certain stages of grnath.
`ionsepoantlp,
`the stable
`propagation of a plasnii can also iepnol on phpsinlogical parareters
`of this tppe.
`
`terninator in
`on signals into plannils carrping the iieatical
`position i failel.
`hnr interpretation of these experience is that
`the axons of hill proincel onler these coalitions nap hearse tonic
`to the cell.
`lnaeoer.
`loaning stoichloetric accents of
`ill-
`rihosoaal hinling sites (omission in position i) cropeting rith
`the signal in front of the hits gene appears to allon the snrninal
`of the sell. Since nnier these coalitions arornl ill of the scalp
`spnthesinol proteins consist of it nsl hill, these esperisents seen
`to iniicate that, hp one of the proper expression signals inanlti-
`copp plasaila. at least in transiatinai ehinerp oi the host can
`he exhaoatei at certain stages of grnath.
`ionsepoantlp,
`the stable
`propagation of a plasnii can also iepnol on phpsinlogical parareters
`of this tppe.
`
`terninator in
`on signals into plannils carrping the iieatical
`position i failel.
`hnr interpretation of these experience is that
`the axons of hill proincel onler these coalitions nap hearse tonic
`to the cell.
`lnaeoer.
`loaning stoichloetric accents of
`ill-
`rihosoaal hinling sites (omission in position i) cropeting rith
`the signal in front of the hits gene appears to allon the snrninal
`of the sell. Since nnier these coalitions arornl ill of the scalp
`spnthesinol proteins consist of it nsl hill, these esperisents seen
`to iniicate that, hp one of the proper expression signals inanlti-
`copp plasaila. at least in transiatinai ehinerp oi the host can
`he exhaoatei at certain stages of grnath.
`ionsepoantlp,
`the stable
`propagation of a plasnii can also iepnol on phpsinlogical parareters
`of this tppe.
`
`hlilllliii Willi
`
`hlilllliii Willi
`
`hlilllliii Willi
`
`hlilllliii Willi
`
`ile resnlts lescrihel here nnere ohtainei as "rile prolnots' in
`a prngra in iaicl plaoils are serelp heing nsel as tools to pro-
`iaae all to strip signals of gene expression in nitrn anl innino.
`teen in scale sisple constructs as lfscnsssl here, share an iron the
`ill sepneneas anl the topograplp of the rain locations, it appears
`that one often cannt preiict
`the antenna of senninglp hnnalogons
`enperlsnnts, anl pnanling pnestions lltiliiiit.
`ihep iniicate that
`can seal straig)ntinrearl artificial plasnil coastrnots cannot he
`hotel at in a static nap.
`lnsteal, they appear as ipnaio entities
`innhicl, for eaanpie,
`the extent of transcription in others re-
`gions nap represent onlp one each nariahie to he tries into accnnt
`shall each a spacer iecone preiictahle.
`
`ile resnlts lescrihel here nnere ohtainei as "rile prolnots' in
`a prngra in iaicl plaoils are serelp heing nsel as tools to pro-
`iaae all to strip signals of gene expression in nitrn anl innino.
`teen in scale sisple constructs as lfscnsssl here, share an iron the
`ill sepneneas anl the topograplp of the rain locations, it appears
`that one often cannt preiict
`the antenna of senninglp hnnalogons
`enperlsnnts, anl pnanling pnestions lltiliiiit.
`ihep iniicate that
`can seal straig)ntinrearl artificial plasnil coastrnots cannot he
`hotel at in a static nap.
`lnsteal, they appear as ipnaio entities
`innhicl, for eaanpie,
`the extent of transcription in others re-
`gions nap represent onlp one each nariahie to he tries into accnnt
`shall each a spacer iecone preiictahle.
`
`ile resnlts lescrihel here nnere ohtainei as "rile prolnots' in
`a prngra in iaicl plaoils are serelp heing nsel as tools to pro-
`iaae all to strip signals of gene expression in nitrn anl innino.
`teen in scale sisple constructs as lfscnsssl here, share an iron the
`ill sepneneas anl the topograplp of the rain locations, it appears
`that one often cannot preiict
`the antenna of senninglp hnnalogons
`enperlsnnts, anl pnanling pnestions lltiliiiit.
`ihep iniicate that
`can seal straig)ntinrearl artificial plasnil coastrnots cannot he
`hotel at in a static nap.
`lnsteal, they appear as ipnaio entities
`innhicl, for eaanpie,
`the extent of transcription in others re-
`gions nap represent onlp one each nariahie to he tries into accnnt
`shall each a spacer iecone preiictahle.
`
`ile resnlts lescrihel here nnere ohtainei as "rile prolnots' in
`a prngra in iaicl plaoils are serelp heing nsel as tools to pro-
`iaae all to strip signals of gene expression in nitrn anl innino.
`teen in scale sisple constructs as lfscnsssl here, share an iron the
`ill sepneneas anl the topograplp of the rain locations, it appears
`that one often cannt preiict
`the antenna of senninglp hnnalogons
`enperlsnnts, anl pnanling pnestions lltiliiiit.
`ihep iniicate that
`can seal straig)ntinrearl artificial plasnil coastrnots cannot he
`hotel at in a static nap.
`lnsteal, they appear as ipnaio entities
`innhicl, for eaanpie,
`the extent of transcription in others re-
`gions nap represent onlp one each nariahie to he tries into accnnt
`shall each a spacer iecone preiictahle.
`
`liiiiiillii
`
`liiiiiillii
`
`liiiiiillii
`
`liiiiiillii
`
`1.
`
`i.
`
`a.
`
`l.
`
`5.
`
`trials, i.l., nah i. lnjanl (iili) interaction of o. ol_i iii
`polpnerase rith pronters:
`the relative rates of conpiex for
`nation anl lecap rith prolnters of seoeral phage anl plannil
`iil's.
`trot. lath. isal. ill, on ihtihi-iii.
`innner, i.
`(hill) lntersnshongen nor
`iechsdnirhng non o.
`oofi iii-iolpserase nit irnnotoren.
`iiplnnarheit, hnineraitit
`leiielierg, hi ieilelherg, iii.
`iohen. anl a. open
`lento, n., a. ianpner, nor. snag. s.n.
`(till)
`iloning anl analpais of
`strong proeoters
`in sale
`possihiehp the loanstrean plaoeaent oi an ill ternination
`signal.
`tron. iati. ical. ici., iii lirlililill.
`itnaher, i., anl l. injarl (lill) transcription fro: efficient
`proeaters can interfere rith plassil replication al lininisi
`expression of plasail specifiel genes.
`filo iciiii-ilil.
`lesarini, t., i.i. loosing. anl i. ioiisip (hill) antral of
`iolii ill replication:
`the top gene prslnot negatinelp affects
`transcription

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket