throbber
Mol Gen Genet (1982) 186:497—500
`
`MUG
`
`© Springer—Verlag 1982
`
`Mechanism of pBR322 Transduction Mediated
`by Cytosine-Substituting T4 Bacteriophage
`
`Hideo Takahashi and Hiuga Saito
`Institute of Applied Microbiology, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo—ku, Tokyo, Japan
`
`Summary. A cytosine—substitution type mutant of bacterio-
`phage T4 (T4dC phage) has been shown to mediate the
`transfer of plasmid pBR322. The transduction frequency
`was around 10‘2 per singly infected cell at low multiplicity
`of infection. The transductants contained either a monomer
`
`or multimers of pBR322. The transducing capacity of T4dC
`phage was resistant to methylmethanesulfonate treatment.
`The results of Southern blotting experiments have indicated
`that the pBR322 DNA exists as head—to—tail concatemers
`in the transducing particles. The mechanism of transfer of
`pBR322 mediated by T4dC phages is discussed
`
`Introduction
`
`Bacteriophage T4 is one of the most intensively studied
`Escherichia coli phages and contains glucosylated hydroxy—
`methylcytosine (glu-HMC) in its DNA in place of cytosine.
`Isolation of mutants termed T4dC, which incorporate cyto-
`sine instead of HMC, has made it possible to analyze the
`role of glu—HMC in the T4 genome (Snyder et al. 1976).
`T4dC phages have mutations in gene 42(dCMAP hydroxy—
`methylase), gene 56(dCTPase), denB(endonuclease IV), and
`alc (=unf). When T4dC phages are grown in a restriction-
`deficient, non amber—suppressing host, the progeny phage
`particles contain cytosine-substituted DNA, which is sus-
`ceptible to restriction endonucleases in vivo and in vitro
`(Velten et al. 1977; Wilson et al. 1977;'Takahashi et al.
`1978).
`Recently, Wilson et al. (1979) reported that one of the
`T4dC phages, T4GT7, had a capacity to transduce plasmids
`as well as chromosomal markers. Little is known about
`the mechanism of T4GT—mediated transduction. Since the
`
`T4 genome is circularly permuted and encapsulated in a
`headful mode (Streisinger et al. 1964; Wood and Revel
`1976), it would be quite interesting to know the physical
`state of the pBR322 genome in T4 phage particles.
`In this paper we analyze the mechanism of T4dC phage-
`mediated transduction.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`top—agar. Tryptone medium contained 1.0%
`with 2.5 ml
`Bactotryptone (Difco, Detroit, USA), 0.5% NaCl, 0.1%
`glucose, and 1.5% Bactoagar (Difco). Escherichia coli B40
`(supD) and B834(r’ m‘ sup°) were described in a previous
`paper (Takahashi et al. 1978). B834 was used for propaga-
`tion of cytosine-substituted T4 phages and as the recipient
`of transduction. Bacterial strains carrying pBR322 (Bolivar
`et al. 1977) were constructed by CaCl2—treated transforma~
`tion.
`
`Cyl0sine—Substiluzed T4 Phages ( T4dC) and Phage Prepara~
`tion. T4dC(+) phage has point mutations
`in gene
`42(amC87), gene 56(amE51), denB(s19), and alc(unf39)
`(Takahashi
`et al.
`1978;
`Takahashi
`et al.
`1979).
`T4dC(NB5060) phage has a deletion in the rII—a’enB—ndd
`region (NB5060) beside triple mutations of amC87, amE51
`and alc(Wilson et al. 1979). T4dC phages were grown in
`B834 carrying pBR322 by the method described in previous
`papers (Takahashi et al. 1978; Takahashi et al. 1979).
`Phage particles were purified by differential centrifugations.
`
`Cleavage of DNA. Cleavage of DNA was performed as
`described in a previous paper (Takahashi et al. 1979). Re»
`striction endonucleases were purchased from Takara Shuzo,
`Co., Kyoto, Japan. Agarose gel electrophoresis was per~
`formed on a horizontal
`slab gel
`(0.7 cm x 14.5 cm x
`13.5 cm) with 0.7% agarose (Seakem). The electrophoresis
`buffer consisted of 0.09 M Tris—0.09 M boric acid, pH 8.2,
`and 2.5 mM EDTA. Southern transfer (Southern 1975) and
`hybridization were done according to the method described
`in ‘Manual for Genetic Engineering’ (Davis et al. 1980).
`Hybridization was performed in a buffer consisting of
`0.9 M NaCl,
`50 mM Na2HPO4—NaH2PO4,
`pH 7.0,
`5 mM EDTA, 0.3% SDS, 100 pg/ml denatured and soni~
`cated calf thymus DNA, and “P-labeled pBR322 DNA
`at 38° C for 20 h. The probe DNA was prepared by labeling
`HaeIII~c1eaved pBR322 DNA with T4 DNA polymerase
`and oc32P—dATP according to the method of O’Farrell et al.
`(1980). Specific radioactivity of the probe was around
`107cpm per pg. Nitrocellulose filters of Schleicher and
`Schuell, Co. were used for DNA transfer.
`
`Bacterial Strains and Media. M9S medium (Takahashi et al.
`1975) was used for growing bacterial strains. Titration of
`bacteria and phage was done on tryptone plates overlayed
`
`Transduction by T4dC Phage. For transduction of pBR322,
`T4dC phages were grown in B834 carrying pBR322. Puri-
`fied phages were diluted with M9 buffer (Takahashi 1978)
`and mixed with recipient cells grown in M9S medium. Usu-
`Mylan v. Genentech
`Offprint requests to: H. TakahashiMylan V. Genentechally, 100 pl recipient cells (5 X 107 viable cells) were mixed
`IPR2016-00710
`IPR2016-00710
`Genentech Exhibit 2063
`
`Genentech Exhibit 2063
`
`0026-8925/82/0186/0497/$01.00
`
`

`
`498
`
`with the same volume of T4dC phage suspension. After
`incubation at 37° C for 7 min for adsorption, the infected
`cells were centrifuged and washed once with M9 buffer.
`Portions of the infected cells were plated on tryptone agar
`plates containing 10 ug/ml ampicillin. Transduction fre-
`quencies are presented as Amp’ transductants per singly
`infected cell.
`
`Isolation and Detection of Plasmid DNA. Rapid detection
`of plasmids from colonies was performed as follows: A
`medium sized colony was suspended in 10 pl TE buffer
`(10 mM Tris—HCl, pH 7.5 and 10 mM EDTA) containing
`100 pg/ml egg-white lysozyme and incubated for 5 min on
`ice. To this were added 2 pl 2 N NaOH and 1 pl 10% SDS.
`The mixture was incubated at 37° C for 30 min. The solu-
`
`tions were neutralized with 2 ul 2N Tris-base and mixed
`with 3 pl 4 N NaCl. Samples were analyzed by agarose gel
`electrophoresis. For isolation of plasmid DNA on a prepar-
`ative scale, the alkaline method mentioned above was scaled
`up. In this case, a cleared lysate was prepared by centrifug-
`ing the neutralized NaCl-containing sample at 30,000 rpm
`for 2 h. The cleared supernatant solution was treated with
`an equal volume of chloroform-phenol mixture (1 :1).
`Nucleic acids were precipitated with ethanol and treated
`with RNAse and proteinase K. Finally plasmid DNA was
`separated by CsCl-EtBr centrifugation.
`
`MMS Treatment of T4dC Phage. Methylmethanesulfonate
`(MMS, Eastmann, Co.) was added to 0.1 M Tris—HCl solu-
`tion containing 109 plaque forming units (p.f.u.) of T4dC
`phage. After various times of 37° C incubation, aliquots
`were diluted with M9S medium containing 0.2 M NaZS2O3
`to inactivate MMS. The pBR322 transducing capacity was
`determined by infecting B834 cells at m.o.i. =0.01 and plat-
`ing on tryptone agar plates containing 10 pg/ml ampicillin.
`
`Results
`
`1. Transduction ofpBR322 Mediated by T4dC Phages
`
`To examine the transducing capacity of T4dC phages, two
`T4dC phages, T4dC(+) and T4dC(NB5060), were propa-
`gated in B834 carrying pBR322. When the lysates were used
`to infect B834, ampicillin resistant (Amp‘) colonies were
`obtained. Niether wild-type T4 grown in B834 carrying
`pBR322 nor T4dC phages grown in B834 without pBR322
`gave rise to any Amp‘ colonies. The transduction frequency
`by T4dC(NB5060) grown in B834 carrying pBR322 was
`around 2><10”2 Amp’ transductants per viable cell at a
`low multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.), which was 5-fold high-
`er than that obtained with T4dC(+) phage. As shown in
`Fig. 1, the number of transductants increased with increas-
`ing m.o.i. in the range of 0.0001—0.5. At a higher m.o.i.,
`the number of transductants decreased, presumably because
`of the killing effects of viable T4 phage particles. The linear
`relationship between the input phage particles and the
`number of transductants suggests that one transducing par-
`ticle is capable of giving rise to one transductant.
`
`2. Occurrence of Multimers in pBR322 Transductan ts
`
`To analyze plasmids in T4dC-mediated transductants,
`Amp‘ transductants were purified and the plasmid DNA
`derived from them was examined by agarose gel electro-
`
`1o“
`
`1
`
`E’
`U=
`2
`'UV!
`5
`,'_'
`"a.
`5 1
`
`1
`
`103+
`
`102
`
`101
`
`o.oo1
`0.0001
`Multiplicity
`
`Of
`
`0.1
`0.01
`Infection
`
`1
`
`Fig. 1. Effect of multiplicity of infection on T4dC-mediated
`pBR322 transduction. T4dC(NB5060) phage propagated in either
`B834 carrying pBR322 9-0;) or B40 carrying pBR322
`(;o—) was used as the donor phage. A culture of B834 was
`infected with T4dC phage at
`increasing m.o.i.
`ranging from
`0.0001—1.0. The number of pBR322 transductants was determined
`by plating on ampicillin-containing plates
`
`<— Trimer
`
`<— Dimer
`
`<- Monomer
`
`
`
`Fig. 2A—C. Agarose gel electrophoresis of plasmids from T4dC-
`mediated transductants. The DNA samples were electrophoresed
`through
`a
`0.7% agarose
`gel. A Standard
`pBR322 DNA
`(monomer), B partially purified plasmid DNA from a transductant
`containing dimer plasmids, and C partially purified plasmid DNA
`from a transductant containing trimer plasmids
`
`phoresis. Out of 40 Amp‘ transductants examined, 23 clones
`were shown to contain the monomeric form of pBR322,
`and the remaining clones contained either dimers or trimers
`of pBR322. These multimers had a tendency to segregate
`to monomers of pBR322 (Fig. 2). After 20 generations in
`broth culture in the presence of ampicillin, more than half
`the multimers kept the original configuration. In contrast,
`when pBR322 was introduced by CaCl2-transformation, all
`Ampr transformants tested contained monomers. Therefore
`we suspected that the unusually high occurrence of multi-
`meric forms in T4dC—mediated transductants might be due
`to multimeric forms of the pBR322 genome in the transduc-
`ing particles.
`
`

`
`1.0
`
`0.1
`
`.
`
`:
`O
`‘.2U
`EH.
`
`5’
`E
`
`'_E 0.01
`'>'I-
`3
`(D
`
`0.001
`
`0
`
`0
`
`I
`
`45
`30
`15
`I ncubation Time (min)
`
`60
`
`Fig. 3. Effect of MMS on viability and transducing capacity of
`T4dC phage. T4dC(NB5060) phage propagated in B834 carrying
`pBR322 was treated with 0.02 M MMS at 37° C. At times of incu~
`bation, the plaque-forming units (fo—) and transducing capac~
`ity (—-o—) were determined
`
`3. Methylmethanesulfonate (MMS) Resistance
`of the Transducing Particles
`
`MMS inactivates phages by interacting with their DNA.
`To test the MMS sensitivity of T4dC transducing particles,
`T4dC(NB5060) phage propagated in B834 carrying pBR322
`was treated with 0.02 M MMS at 37° C. Surviving fractions
`of plaque—forming units and the transducing capacity were
`determined. As shown in Fig. 3, the transducing capacity
`remained constant up to 120 min at which time the plaque-
`forming units were reduced by 1075. The transducing ca-
`pacity was resistant also to ultraviolet irradiation (data not
`shown). These results suggest that the pBR322 DNA in
`the transducing particles is physically very stable.
`
`4. Head-T0—Tail Multimeric Form 0fpBR322
`in the Transducing Particles
`
`To analyze the physical structure of pBR322 molecules in
`the T4dC transducing particles, DNA from T4dC(NB5060)
`
`499
`
`phage grown in B834 carrying pBR322 was examined by
`agarose gel electrophoresis. No visible DNA band corre-
`sponding to either CCC or linear forms of pBR322 was
`detected when the intact DNA was analyzed on the gel.
`However, when the DNA was cleaved with BamHI endonu—
`clease, a DNA band having identical mobility with that
`of the pBR322 linear form was observed (Fig. 4,
`lane B
`and D). Since T4 phage DNA has only one site for BamHI
`(Takahashi et al. 1979; Wilson et al. 1980), the DNA band
`was conceivably derived from DNA of a larger size, pre-
`sumably head—to—tail concatemers of pBR322 DNA.
`To confirm the presence of multimeric forms of pBR322
`molecules in the transducing particles, Southern hybridiza-
`tion experiments were performed. A 32P—labeled pBR322
`probe hybridized only with high molecular weight DNA
`when the intact DNA was used (Fig. 4, lane a). However,
`when the T4dC DNA was treated with restriction endonu—
`
`cleases BamHI, Pstl or Ball, which cleaves pBR322 DNA
`only once, then the pBR322 probe hybridized extensively
`with the band corresponding to the linear monomer of
`pBR322 DNA (Fig. 4, lanes b, e, f, and g). On the other
`hand, the probe hybridized only with high molecular weight
`DNA when the DNA was treated with KpnI endonuclease
`which has no cleavage site in pBR322 (Fig. 4, lane c and
`(1). These results indicates that the pBR322 DNA in the
`transducing particles exists as a head—to-tail concatemer and
`not integrated in the T4dC genome. Moreover, the intact
`size of DNA from the transducing particles had an identical
`size to that of DNA from the viable T4dC phage particles
`(Fig. 4, lane a). This result indicates that the transducing
`particles contain the same amount of DNA as the viable
`T4dC phage particles. Since the size of T4 phage DNA
`encapsulated in the phage particles is 166 kilobases (kb)
`(Wood and Revel 1976), the size of concatemieric DNA
`encapsulated in the transducing particles was estimated to
`be about 38 monomer equivalents of pBR322 DNA.
`
`Discussion
`
`T4dC phages grown in a suppressor-negative host Carrying
`pBR322 were shown to transduce the plasmid at a high
`frequency. The frequency was around 1072 per singly in-
`fected cell. Procedures for T4dC phage-mediated transduc-
`tion are quite simple and fast. A number of pBR322 deriva~
`tives into which DNA fragments from various origins have
`
`
`
`Fig. 4. Hybridization of 32P—labelcd pBR322
`DNA to restriction fragments of DNA from
`T4dC(NB5060) phage grown in B834
`carrying pBR322. The DNA fragments were
`separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and
`visualized by fluorescence with ethidium
`bromide (A—G). “P-labeled pBR322 DNA
`was hybridized to a Southern imprint of the
`fragments and hybrids were detected by
`autoradiography (a—g). A and a, intact
`DNA; B and b, BamHI digest; C and c,
`Kpnl digest; D and d, Kpnl digest; E and
`e, Ball digest; F and f, PstI digest; G and
`g BamHI digest. D (d) and G (g) samples
`were from the same DNA preparation. The
`arrow indicates the position of pBR322
`linear monomers
`
`

`
`500
`
`been cloned, were also transduced at frequencies equivalent
`to that of pBR322 (Takahashi, Noguchi, and Saito, unpub-
`lished results). Since T4 phage particles can be stored for
`a long period without significant loss of transducing capaci-
`ty, the T4dC—mediated transduction of plasmids can be used
`for preservation as well as transfer to plasmids into new
`hosts.
`
`The T4 phage genome is circularly permuted and has
`a terminal redundancy. The phage DNA is encapsulated
`by a headful mode (Streisinger et al. 1964; Wood and Revel
`1976). The results in this paper have shown that pBR322
`DNA exists as head—to—tail linear multimers in the transduc-
`
`ing particles. Moreover, the transducing particles were esti-
`mated to contain about 38 monomer equivalents of
`pBR322 DNA. DNA of pBR322 mostly exists in the CCC
`form in its host cells. Therefore, intramolecular recombina-
`tions are a prerequisite for producing linear multimers of
`pBR322 in the transducing particles and returning to CCC
`monomers in the recipient cells. The recA function of the
`recipient cells is essential for this interconversion (Taka-
`hashi and Saito, manuscript in preparation).
`T4dC phages grown in a suppressor—plus host carrying
`pBR322 were also able to transduce pBR322 although the
`transduction frequency was lower
`than that by T4dC
`phages grown in a suppressor-minus host carrying pBR322.
`DNA from T4dC phage grown in a suppressor—plus host
`carrying pBR322 was resistant to the restriction endonucle-
`ases Ec0RI, SalI, and Pstl (data not shown). Therefore,
`it
`is
`likely that both cytosine and HMC-containing
`pBR322 DNA in the transducing particles have been repli-
`cated by the T4 replication system, presumably in the mode
`of rolling circle (Streisinger et al. 1964; Wood and Revel
`1976).
`So far we have not succeeded in isolating transducing
`particles free of viable T4dC phage particles. However, the
`viable T4 particles can be selectively inactivated by MMS
`treatment or UV—irradiation. As viable T4 phage particles
`kill the cells infected with transducing particles, this selec-
`tive inactivation of viable phage particles is convenient for
`T4dC-mediated transduction.
`
`References
`
`Bolivar F, Rodriquez RL, Betlach MC, Heynecker HL, Boyer HW,
`Crosa JH, Falkow S (1977) Construction and characterization
`of new cloning vehicles. II. A mltipurpose cloning system. Gene
`2: 95-1 13
`
`Davis RW, Botstein D, Roth JR (eds) (1980) Advanced bacterial
`genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York
`O’Farrell PH, Kutter E, Nakanishi M (1980) A restriction map
`of the bacteriophage T4 genome. Mol Gen Genet 179 :421—435
`Snyder L, Gold L, Kutter E (1976) A gene of bacteriophage T4
`whose product prevents true late transcription on cytosine-con-
`taining T4 DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:2098—3102
`Southern EM (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA
`fragments
`separated by gel electrophoresis.
`J Mol Biol
`23:503—517
`Streisinger G, Edgar RS, Denhardt GH (1964) Chromosomal
`structure in phage T4. 1. Circularity of the linkage map. Proc
`Natl Acad Sci USA 51 :775—779
`Takahashi H (1978) Genetic and physiological characterization of
`Escherichia coli K12 mutants (tabC) which induce the abortive
`infection of bacteriophage T4. Virology 872256-265
`Takahashi H, Coppo A, Manzi A, Martire G, Pulitzer JF (1975)
`Design of a system of Conditional lethal mutations (tab/k/com)
`affecting protein-protein interactions in bacteriophage T4-in-
`fected Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 96:563—578
`Takahashi H, Saito H, Ikeda Y (1978) Viable T4 bacteriophage
`containing cytosine substituted DNA(T4dC phage). 1. Behavior
`towards the restriction-modification systems of Escherichia coli
`and derivation of a new T4 phage strain (T4dC) having the
`complete T4 genome. J Gen Appl Microbiol 24:297—306
`Takahashi H, Shimizu M, Saito H, Ikeda Y (1979) Studies of
`Viable T4
`bacteriophage
`containing
`cytosine-substituted
`DNA(T4dC phage). II. Cleavage of T4dC DNA by endonucle-
`ase SalI and BamHI. Mol Gen Genet 168 :49—53
`Velten J, Fukada K, Abelson J (1977) In vitro construction of
`bacteriophage and plasmid DNA molecules containing DNA
`fragments from bacteriophage T4. Gene 1:93—106
`Wilson GG, Tanyashin VI, Murray NE (1977) Molecular cloning
`of fragments of bacteriophage T4 DNA. Mol Gen Genet
`1561203-214
`Wilson GG, Young KY, Edlin GJ (1979) High-frequency general-
`ized transduction by bacteriophage T4. Nature 280 : 8(P82
`Wilson GG, Neve RR, Edlin GJ, Koningsberg WH (1980) The
`BamHI restriction site in the bacteriophage T4 chromosome
`is located in or near gene 8. Genetics 931285-296
`Wood WB, Revel HR (1976) The genome of bacteriophage T4.
`Bacteriol Rev 40: 847-868
`
`Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to Dr. G.G. Wilson
`for generously supplying us with a phage strain. This work was
`supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from
`Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.
`
`Communicated by K. Isono
`
`Received January 26 / April 2, 1982

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket