throbber
Nature Vol. 276 16 November 1978
`
`269
`
`strains, small but significant interstrain differences in lactate
`dehydrogenase activity were observed“. Therefore, it seems
`that biochemical data on the ova of random bred Swiss mice may
`not be generally representative.
`We conclude that
`the absolute level of ova GPI activity,
`although strictly regulated within each strain, can vary over a
`considerable range and yet permit successful reproduction. This
`situation now provides a unique opportunity for
`further
`exploration
`into
`developmental gene
`regulation during
`oogenesis and also during preimplantation development”'”.
`This study was supported by the MRC of Canada (the MRC
`Group in Developmental Neurobiology). We thank R. Camp-
`bell for technical assistance.
`
`A. C. PETERSON
`G. G. WONG
`
`Department of Neurosciences.
`McMaster University,
`1200 Main Street West,
`Hamilton, Ontario, Canada LSS 419
`
`pwsaaewwr
`
`Received 12 June: accepted 23 August 1978.
`Carter, N. D. & Parr, C. W. Nature 216, 511 (1967).
`DcLorenzo. R. J. & Ruddle. F. H. Biochem. Gcnel. 3, 151 (1969).
`Carter, N. D. & Yoshida. A. Biochi'm. biophys. Asia 181, 468—470 (1969).
`Peterson, A. C.. Frair. P. M. & Wong. G. Biachem. Genet. (in the press).
`Paigen. K , Swank, R T., Tomino. S. & Ganschow, R. E. I. CellPltysiol 85, 379 (1975).
`Sorensen, R. A. & Wasserman. P. M. Dev] Biol. 50, 531436 (1976).
`Stevens, W. L. J. Gum. 43. 301407 (1942).
`Padua, R. A., Bulfield. G. & Peters, J. Biochem. Genet. 16, 127—143 (1978).
`Epstein. C. L. Biol. Reprad. 12. 827105 (1975).
`10. Epstein, C J & Smith, S. A. Deal Bin]. 33, 1717184 (1973).
`11. Brinster, R. L. J'. Reprod. Fen. 17, 139446 (1968).
`12. Chapman, V. M.. Whitten. W. K. & Ruddle. F. H. Dev! Biol. M. 153—158 (1971).
`13. Brinster, R. L. Biochem. Genet. 9, 1877191 (1973).
`
`
`A better cell line for making
`hybridomas secreting specific antibodies
`
`FUSION of myeloma cells which grow in tissue culture with
`spleen cells from an immunised mouse provides a general
`method for obtaining cell lines (hybridomas) which make anti-
`body of the desired specificity"? Hybrids derived from these
`myelomas make the immunoglobulin (lg) heavy and light chains
`of the myeloma parent as well as the antigen—specific heavy and
`light chains of the spleen cell parent. In conditions in which the
`two heavy and two light chains associate randomly, a hybridoma
`would make 10 distinct Ig molecules, and the specific antibody
`would comprise only 1/ 16 of the total 1g“. To obtain hybrid-
`omas making only the specific antibodies requires a tumour cell
`fusion partner that itself makes no Ig but which can nevertheless
`be fused with spleen cells to obtain hybrids secreting only the
`specific antibody. We report here the identification of such a cell
`line, SpZ/O-Ag14.
`Sp2/0-Agl4 was isolated as a re-clone of SpZ/HL-Ag, itself
`derived in several steps from Sp2/HLGK, a hybrid between a
`BALB/c spleen cell contributing a y2b (H) and K (L) chain with
`anti—sheep red blood cell activity and the myeloma cell line
`X63—Ag8 (11 (G) and K (K))2. Sp2/0-Ag14 is resistant to 20 pg
`ml’l 8—azaguanine, dies in HAT supplemented medium and
`synthesises no lg chains. It has about 73 chromosomes which is
`only eight more than the chromosome number of X63-Ag8. a
`cell line commonly used to generate hybridomas.
`Sp2/0—Ag14 was fused with spleen cells of mice immunised
`with trinitrophenyl derivatised keyhole limpet haemocyanin
`(TNP—KLH)
`to generate hybridomas making TNP-specific
`immunoglobulin (Fig. 1). Fusions were done with either poly-
`ethylene glycol (PEG) 1500 or Sendai virus, and transferred to
`medium either containing or lacking mouse peritoneal exudate
`cells. Growth was observed in only eight culture Wells, all from
`the set that were fused with PEG and grown with peritoneal
`exudate cells.
`
`002870836/7 8111276~0269lé01 .01)
`
`
`
`lmmunoglobulin from TNP-specific hybridomas analysed
`Fig. l
`by SDS—polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. To obtain hybridomas
`making lg specific for the hapten trinitrophenyl, BALB/c mice
`were immunised i.p. with trinitrophenyl-derivitised keyhold limpet
`haemocyanin (TNP-KLH) (from H. Kiefer), first with 100 ug
`TNP-KLH contained in 0.2 ml emulsion of 50% phosphate-
`bufiered saline (PBS), 50% complete Freund‘s adjuvant (Difco).
`35 days later a second injection of 100 pg TNP-KLH in 0.2 ml PBS
`was made i.p., and 5 days later the spleens of these mice were
`prepared for fusion. Fusion with PEG 1500 was as described by
`Galfre et (11.9, except that the medium used was R medium, RPMI
`1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 30mM HEPES (Flow).
`Here 3 x 107 Sp2/0-Ag14 and 5 X 107 spleen cells were centrifuged
`together at 200 g for 5 min and resuspended slowly in 0.6 ml 50%
`PEG in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle‘s medium (Flow). After 1 min
`at 37 °C, 20 m1 of R medium was added slowly. The cells were then
`centifuged and resuspended in 20 ml of R medium supplemented
`with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco) (RF medium) and 0.2 ml of this
`suspension was then distributed to each of 200 wells containing
`0.8 ml RF medium. One hundred of these wells also contained
`2 x to5 mouse peritoneal exudate cells. After 24 h incubation, 1 ml
`RF supplemented with hypoxanthine, aminopterin and thymidine
`(HAT) was added to each well. Every 2—3 days, 1 ml of the medium
`was replaced with fresh RF+HAT. After 2 weeks, growth was
`observed in eight wells of the peritoneal exudate supplemented
`wells and the cultures were tested for immunoglobulin production
`by testing the culture medium for lysis of protein A coated sheep
`red blood cells (SRC) for nonspecific lgm and of TNP coated SRC
`(for TNP specific activity). After 1—2 months the cells from TNP-
`specific wells were cloned by plating in soft agar11 or in methyl
`cellulose”. The soft agar clones were overlaid with TNP coated
`SRC, and clones lysing the TNP coated SRC were transferred to
`liquid medium. The cells were grown in the presence of MC leucine
`to label secreted lg which was analysed by SDS polyacrylamide gel
`electrophoresis as described“. The hybridoma cell lines analysed
`were hy5.19 (a), hy2.15 (b), hyl.2 (c) and hy3.3 (d).
`
`Supernatant of four of the eight growth-positive wells lysed
`protein A but not TNP-coated sheep red blood cells (SRC)
`suggesting that the Ig made by these cells did not have TNP
`specificity. The Ig secreted by these cells was analysed by
`SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and
`found to be lgM (data not shown). The remaining four growth
`positive wells lysed both TNP and protein A SRC and cells from
`these wells were cloned and analysed further, as described
`below. SDS-PAGE analysis suggested that
`these cell
`lines
`secreted lgG (Fig. 1). Ouchter10ny analysis of culture super-
`natants using class-specific antisera (Litton Bionetics) indicated
`that hyl.2 makes an lgGZa, and that hy2.15, hy3.3 and hy5.19
`make IgGl and that all four TNP-specific hybridomas make a K
`light chain. The SDS-PAGE analysis shown in Fig. 1 indicates
`that the clones can be distinguished by the mobility of the light or
`heavy chain, implying that these cell lines are making difierent
`antibodies.
`We have examined the TNP-specific hybridomas for re-
`expression of the SRC-specific lgGZb of the progenitor cell line
`Sp2/HL-Ag14 by testing for SRC-specific plaques. No plaques
`
`© Macmillan Journals Ltd 1978
`
`Mylan v. Genentech
`|PR2016-00710
`
`Merck Ex. 1117, Pg. 1
`
`Mylan v. Genentech
`IPR2016-00710
`Merck Ex. 1117, Pg. 1
`
`

`

`270
`
`were found and we conclude that revertants constitute fewer
`than one in 5 X 104 of the TNP—specific hybridoma cells.
`The karyotypes of the TNP-specific cell lines provide evi—
`dence that these cells are hybrids of Sp2/O-Ag14 and mouse
`cells. Normal mouse cells and Sp2/0-Ag14 contain 40 and 73
`chromosomes, respectively. The TNP—specific cell lines hy1.2,
`hy2.15, hy3,3 and hy5.19 contain approximately 100, 105, 106
`and 99 chromosomes, respectively, and we suppose that fusion
`yielded hybrids that segregated better growing cells that had lost
`7—14 chromosomes.
`Evidence has been presented that X63-Ag8 cells pref-
`erentially fuse with the dividing cells of the spleen2‘6'7, which for
`the B—cell compartment consist mainly of Ig-secreting, plaque-
`forming cells. Sp2/O-Ag14 seems to display the same pref—
`erence. In the population of spleen cells used for this fusion,
`approximately 0.4% of the cells made indirect (IgG) TNP-
`specific plaques and 0.004% made direct (IgM) TNP plaques.
`Assuming that 1% of the spleen cells are plaque forming cells8
`one would anticipate that about 40% of the hybridomas would
`make lgG with TNP specificity, as was observed. On the other
`hand, about 90% of the nonspecific plaque-forming cells of the
`spleen make IgM rather than IgGs, so that one would anticipate
`that among the nonspecific hybridomas, 90% would also make
`IgM, a figure that is consistent with our observation that all four
`nonspecific hybridomas examined made IgM.
`To obtain high—titre preparations of the TNP—specific lg, 106
`TNP-specific hybridoma cells were injected intraperitoneally
`into BALB/c mice. All caused tumours and yielded ascites fluid
`with titres generally about 100 times higher than for the culture
`supernatants.
`The efliciency of fusion with Sp2/0-Ag14 has been variable.
`In our early experiments, such as the fusion described above, we
`obtained fewer hybrids than we ordinarily obtain with X63—
`Ag8. However, in more recent experiments, fusions with Sp2/0-
`Ag14 have often been more efficient, in particular in fusions
`with lipopolysaccharide stimulated spleen cells or with large
`spleen cells (F. Melchers, Clark and GK, unpublished obser—
`vations). We consider that Sp2/0-Ag14 can yield as many
`hybrids as X63-Ag8.
`Alternative methods exist for obtaining hybridomas that do
`not express the myeloma Ig. It has been possible to isolate
`re—clones that have lost the expression of the nonspecific heavy
`or light chainsz. This problem has been reduced by fusing with
`NSI-Ag 4/ 1, a derivative of X63 that makes the K but not the yl
`chain of the myelomaz. We anticipate that Sp2/0-Ag14 will
`prove yet a better cell line for generating hybridomas making
`truly monoclonal antibodies.
`
`MARC SHULMAN*
`C. D. WILDE‘l‘
`GEORGES KOHLER*
`
`*Basel Institute for Immunology,
`Grenzacherstrasse 487,
`Postfach, 4005 Basel 5, Switzerland
`
`TMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology,
`Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
`Received 21 July; accepted 20 October 1978.
`
`Kohler, G. 31 Milstein, C. Nature 256, 495497 (1975).
`Kohler, G. & Milstein, C. Eur, J. Immurti 6, 5 l l—Sl9 (1076)
`were
`. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology (eds Melchcrs, R, Potter, M, & Warner, N .}
`(Springer, Berlin, in the press).
`4. Kohlcr. G.. Hengartner. H. & Shulman. M. Eur. J. Immun. 8. 82—88 (1978).
`5. Shulman, M. & Kohler, G. Nature 274, 917919 (1978).
`6. Kohler, G. & Shulman, M. in Current Topics in thhifllflgy and Immunology 1434149
`(Springer, Berlin. 1978).
`7. Andersson, J. & Melchers F. in Current Topics in Microbioiogy and Immunology 130—140
`(Springer, Berlin. 1978).
`8. Andersson, J., Coutinho, A. dc Melchers, F. J. exp. Med. 145, 1520—1530 (1977).
`9, Galfre, CL, Howe, S., Milstein, C,, Butcher, G. & Howard, J. Nature 266, 550—552 (1977).
`10. Gronowitz, E., Coutinho. A. & Mclchers, F. Eur. J. Immun. 6. 588—590 (1976).
`11. Cotton, R., Secher, D. & Milstein, C. Eur. 1. human 3, 135—140 (1973).
`12. Shulman. M.
`in Research Methods in Immunology (eds Lelkovits,
`I. & Pernis, 13.)
`(Academic, New York, in the press).
`
`Nature Vol. 276 16 November 1978
`
`
`Activation of latent Epstein—Barr
`virus by antibody to human IgM
`
`EPSTEINvBARR VIRUS (EBV) is the causative agent of most
`infectious mononucleosis‘ and is also associated with two human
`tumours, Burkitt’s
`lymphoma (BL)2 and nasopharyngeal
`carcinomal. Lymphoid cell
`lines of B-cell origin have been
`established from patients with these diseases, and from
`lymphocytes transformed in vitro by EBVE. In lymphoid cell
`lines the lytic viral cycle is usually repressed even though the
`cells carry multiple copies of the EBV genome. These cells
`therefore provide a valuable model for the study of latent EBV
`infection. Although EBV is ubiquitous,
`its association with
`human malignant disease is to a large extent both ethnically and
`geographically restricted2 and it
`is therefore of interest
`to
`understand the host factors involved in the regulation of the
`expression
`of
`the
`latent EBV genome.
`In
`infectious
`mononucleosis, EBV infection is associated not only with a
`specific anti-EBV antibody2 and T-lymphocytc response4 but
`also with an increase in nonspecific lgM productions. EBV—
`infcctcd B lymphocytes produce polyclonal lg (ref. 6) and the
`majority of established EBV genome-positive lymphoid cell
`lines possess surface IgM (ref. 7). We report here that treatment
`of several human lymphoid cell lines with antisera to human IgM
`activates the latent EBV genome to give a marked increase in
`EBV—specific early antigen (EA). Also, in some cell lines this
`treatment induces an increase in virus capsid antigen (VCA).
`Treatment of BL-derived Raji cells with antiserum directed
`against human immunoglobulins increased the number of
`cells expressing EBV EA by up to 5,000—fold, to give 11%
`ISA—positive cells determined by either direct or
`indirect
`immunofiuorescencc (Table l), and confirmed by EA-spccific
`complement fixation". The fluorescence was specific for EA, as
`no positive cells were observed after staining with either control
`EBV-negative human serum, or with anti-VCA—positive EA-
`negativc antiserum. EBV—specified antigens can be induced in
`lymphoid cell lines by halogenated pyrimidincsg’m, inhibitors of
`protein synthesis“ or the tumour promotor 12—O-tetradecanoyl
`
`Induction of EA in Cultures of Raji cells treated with
`Fig. 1
`various dilutions of antiserum. Cells were cultivated for 72 h with a
`particular dilution of antiserum in the presence of
`IUdR
`(ZSug ml”). The number of EA—positive cells was then deter—
`mined on acetonevfixed smears by indirect immunofiuorescence.
`None of the antisera had any eflcct on cell viability at the dilutions
`shown in the figure. 0, Sheep anti»total human immunoglobulins;
`0, goat anti«human IgM; 13, goat anti»human IgA; I, goat anti»
`human IgG; A, goat anti~human lgD; 0, goat anti-human IgE; A,
`IUdR alone (25 ug ml”).
`
`50
`
`NwAOOO
`
`'5
`
`
`
`3;",EAApositivecells
`
`§:
`
`23456
`
`log antiserum dilution
`
`0028v0836/78/0276-0270301.00
`
`© Macmillan Journals Ltd 1978
`
`Merck Ex. 1117, Pg. 2
`
`Merck Ex. 1117, Pg. 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket