throbber
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 80, pp. 6351-6355, October 1983
`Immunology
`
`Functional immunoglobulin M production after transfection of
`cloned immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes into
`lymphoid cells
`(protoplast fusion/0! 18 selection)
`ATSUO OCHr*T, ROBERT C. HAwLEY*T, TERESA HAwLEY*T, MARC J. SHULMANl¢, ANDRE TRAUNECKER§,
`GEORGES KorrLER§, AND NOBUMICHI HOZUMI*l
`*Ontario Cancer Institute and lDepartm
`ent of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 500 Sherboume Street, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9 Canada; ‘Rheumatic
`; and §Basel Institute for Immunology, Crenzacherstrasse 487, Basel CH-4005, Switzerland
`Disease Unit, Wellesley Hospital, Toronto, ON M4Y 1J3 Canada
`
`Communicated by Niels Kaj Jerne, July 11, 1983
`
`The rearranged immunoglobulin heavy (u) and
`ABSTRACT
`light (K) chain genes cloned from the Sp6 hybridoma cell line pro-
`ducing immunoglobulin M specific for the hapten 2,4,6-trinitro-
`phenyl were inserted into the transfer vector pSV2-neo and in-
`troduoed into various plasmacytoma and hybridoma cell lines. The
`transfer of the u and K genes resulted in the production of pen-
`tameric, hapten-specific, functional IgM.
`
`Work over the last decades has provided extensive information
`on immunoglobulin function and structure (1). Despite this in-
`formation, it has been possible only in gross terms to relate mo-
`lecular function with particular structural features.
`With the advent of genetic engineering and gene transfer
`techniques, questions regarding structure—function relation-
`ships can now be readily addressed—that is, virtually any gene
`segment can be modified precisely in vitro and the novel seg-
`ment can then be exchanged with its normal counterpart. By
`introducing such engineered genes into the appropriate cells,
`the effects of systematic alterations in protein structure on pro-
`tein function can be assessed.
`Because immunoglobulin production is a specialized func-
`tion of cells of the B-lymphocyte lineage, it is expected that the
`conditions for proper lg gene expression will be provided only
`in appropriate immunocompetent cells. For example, to pro-
`duce normal pentameric IgM(K), a cell must transcribe, pro-
`cess, and translate RNA for the y. and K chains and also provide
`J protein, enzymes for the proper polymerization and glycosyla-
`tion of the Ig chains, as well as a suitable secretory apparatus.
`We have previously described a system for transferring a func-
`tional immunoglobulin K light chain gene into IgM-producing
`hybridoma cells (2). Here we extend this work to show that the
`transfer of the ,u and K chain genes of a defined specificity into
`various plasmacytoma and hybridoma cell lines results in the
`production of functional pentameric, hapten-specific IgM(K).
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Cell Lines. X63Ag8 was originally derived (3) from the plas-
`macytoma MOPC21 and synthesizes lgGl(K) of unknown spec-
`ificity. X63Ag8.653 was derived from X63Ag8 as a subclone that
`synthesizes neither the heavy (yl) nor light (K) chain (4). Sim-
`ilarly, Sp2/0Ag14 is an lg nonproducing subclone of the Sp2
`hyhridoma (5). Sp6 is a hybridoma making IgM(K) specific for
`the hapten 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl (TNP); originally this cell line
`produced the yl and K chains of X63Ag8 as well as the (TNP
`specific) p.-mp and KTNp chains (6). A subclone of Sp6 not mak-
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertise-
`rnent" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`6351
`
`ing the yl chain was isolated, and the Sp602 and Sp603 cell
`lines were derived from this 71 nonproducer. The mutant cell
`line igm-10, derived from Sp602 (7), lacks the gene encoding
`P«'rNr (3)-
`Gene Transfer. The construction of pSV2-neo plasmid vec-
`tors carrying the genes for p.-mp or K1'N}) or both is described
`in the text. The vectors were transfected into the rfmk" Esch-
`erichia coli strain K803. To transfer the vector, bacteria bearing
`the appropriate plasmids were converted to protoplasts and fused
`to the indicated cell lines as described (2). The frequency of
`G418-resistant transformants per input cell was approximately
`10-4 for X63Ag8 and Sp2/0Agl4, 10-5 for igm-10, and 10-6 for
`X63Ag8.653.
`Analysis of Ig. As described previously (7), lg was biosyn-
`thetically labeled, in the presence or absence of tunicamycin,
`immunoprecipitated, and analyzed by NaDodSO4/polyacryl-
`amide gel electrophoresis with or without disulfide bond re-
`duction. TNP binding IgM was assayed by TNP-dependent
`hemagglutination and by TNP-dependent enzyme-linked im-
`munoadsorbent assay (ELISA) as described (2, 7). The hemo-
`lyses of protein A-coupled erythrocytes and TNP-coupled
`erythrocytes were used to assay total IgM- and TNP-specific
`complement activating IgM, respectively (7).
`Analysis of RNA and DNA. Cytoplasmic RNA was isolated
`according to Schihler et al. (9) and subjected to RNA blot anal-
`ysis as described by Thomas (10).
`Procedures for DNA extraction (11), nitrocellulose blotting
`(12), and radiolabeling of probes (13) have been described (14,
`15). Probes specific for genes encoding immunoglobulin con-
`stant and variable regions are detailed in the figure legends.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Description of Vectors and Expression Systems. The hy-
`bridoma cell line Sp6 secretes IgM(K) specific for the hapten
`TNP. We have previously described the cloning of the TNP-
`specific K gene, designated TK1 (16), and the construction of
`the recombinant, pR-TK1, where TK1 is inserted in the BamHI
`site of the vector pSV2-neo (2, 17). The IJTNP gene was cloned
`in ACh4A from EcoRl partially digested DNA of Sp6 cells, and
`this clone is designated Sp6-718. The 16-kilobase-pair (kbp)
`fragment carrying the variable and constant regions was ob-
`tained from Sp6—718 after partial digestion with EcoRl and was
`inserted at the EcoRI site of the vectors pSV2-neo and pR-TK1.
`In these recombinants, designated pR-Sp6 and pR-HL-mp, re-
`
`Abbreviations: TNP, 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl; ELISA, enzyme-linked im-
`munoadsorbent assay; kbp, kilobase pair(s); SV40, simian virus 40; kb,
`kilobase(s).
`
`Sanofi/Regeneron Ex. 1040, pg 1021
`
`Mylan Ex. 1040, pg 1021
`
`

`
`6352
`
`Immunology: Ochi et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983)
`
`spectively, the amp gene lies in the same orientation as the
`KTN]: gene in pR-TK1—i.e., the direction of transcription of lamp
`is opposite that of the simian virus 40 (SV40) early promoter
`(Fig. 1).
`The mutant cell lines igk-14 and igm-10 that lack the K-mp
`gene and amp gene, respectively, were originally isolated from
`subclones of Sp6 (7). We have previously used igk-14 as a re-
`cipient cell
`line to assay expression of the K'fNp gene (2).
`Expression of the ].L1'Np gene of pR-Sp6 was assayed here in
`igm-10. The simultaneous production of both ump and K-mp
`chains from the vector pR-HL-mp is assayed in X63Ag8, the IgCl-
`producing plasmacytoma parent of the Sp6 hybridoma. In later
`experiments the pR-HL-mp vector was assayed in the non-
`producing cell lines Sp2/0Agl4 and X63Ag8.653. IgM pro-
`duction by the transformants is compared with Sp603, a sub-
`clone of the Sp6 hybridoma.
`Selection of IgM(K)-Positive Transformants. The recombi-
`nant plasmid vectors bearing the Ig genes also contain the bac-
`terial gene neo, which renders the recipient cells resistant to
`
`EcoRI
`
`VHTNP
`
`
`EcoRI
`
`the antibiotic C418 (17). To transfer the Ig genes into the hy-
`hridoma and plasmacytoma cells, bacteria harboring the re-
`combinant plasmids were converted to protoplasts and fused
`with the various cell lines and G418-resistant cells were se-
`lected. Depending on the cell line, the elficiency of G418-re-
`sistant colonies ranged between 10"‘ and 10-6 per input hy-
`bridoma or plasmacytoma cell (see Materials and Methods). The
`culture supernatant of C418-resistant colonies was tested for
`TNP-specific IgM by using either a TNP-specific ELISA or by
`assaying agglutination of TNP-coupled erythrocytes. In various
`experiments between 15% and 75% of the colonies were pos-
`itive in such tests.
`Analysis of pm,» and Km; Production. Colonies that were
`positive for TNP-specific IgM were cloned by limiting dilution
`and examined further. The transformant IR44Ll, derived from
`the K1-Np-positive cell line igm-10 and the ,u.-mp vector pR-Sp6,
`makes about 25% of the normal (Sp603) amount of IgM, as
`measured by the TNP-dependent ELISA. The transformant
`XRl9L4, derived from the cell line X63Ag8 and the ;1.1-Np +
`K-[Np vector pR-Hlrmp, makes about 10% of the normal amount
`of IgM,
`To examine the amp and K'fNp separately, these chains were
`radiolabeled and analyzed by NaDodSO4/polyacrylamide gel
`electrophoresis (Fig. 2). The Sp603 hybridoma cell line still makes
`the K chain of its plasmacytoma parent, X63Ag8 (Fig. 2, lane
`a), as well as the specific p.-mp and K1-Np chains (Fig. 2, lane
`e). The XR19L4 transformant derived from X63Ag8 has two ad-
`ditional bands (Fig. 2, lane b), which comigrate with the 1.1.-mp
`and K-mp of Sp603. The igm-10 cells used here make K-[Np but
`have ceased to produce the K of X63Ag8 (Fig. 2, lane c), pre-
`sumably because of a rearrangement in this K gene (see legend
`to Fig. 5). The IR44Ll transformant derived from igm-10 has
`one new band that comigrates with pump (Fig. 2, lane d). As
`shown in Fig. 3, analysis of unreduced IgM by NaDodSO4/
`polyacrylarnide gel electrophoresis indicates that the trans-
`formants make predominantly pentameric IgM [([.l.2K2)5].
`RNA Production. To examine the RNAs expressed by the
`transferred amp and K'1'Np genes, cytoplasmic RNA from the
`transformants was fractionated by gel electrophoresis and probed
`
`0
`
`b
`
`c
`
`d
`
`e
`
`#- Q T
`
`7-«X-mm
`
`FIG. 1. Structure of the pR-Sp6 and pR-HL-mp plasmids. pR-Sp6
`contains the functionally rearranged [J/[Np gene (~16 kbp), which was
`inserted into the Eco}?! site of pSV2-neo (see text). In addition to the
`p.-mp gene, pRl{L-mp contains the functionally rearranged Kfiflp gene
`(9.6 kbp) at the Bamlll site (2). lg genes are represented by heavy dark
`lines. The directions oftranscription of the Ig genes and the SV40 early
`region are indicated by arrows. The p. and K exons are shown as filled
`boxes. M denotes alternative COOH-terminal coding regions that are
`utilized in the synthesis of membrane IgM. Thin lines are of pBR322
`origin. The white boxes denote DNA derived from SV40, into which the
`bacterial gene conferring neomycin resistance (hatched box) has been
`inserted. For specific details concerning the pSV2-neo transfer vector
`(donated by P. Berg). Bee ref. 17.
`
`K‘ Ham» 3
`TNP
`
`FIG. 2. Analysis of heavy and light chains of secreted lg. G418-
`resistant transformant clones were biosynthetically radiolabeled with
`[“C]leucine as described (7). Secreted immunoglobulins were immu-
`noprecipitated with rabbit anti-mouse IgM antibody complexed with
`protein A-Sepharose CL-4B beads (Pharmacia). The precipitated ma-
`terial was reduced with 2-mercaptoethanol and analyzed by electro-
`phoresis on a NaDodSO4/polyacrylamide gel. Lane a, X63Ag8; lane b,
`XR19L4; lane c, igm-10; lane d, IR44L1; and lane e, wild-type hybri-
`doma Sp603.
`
`Sanofi/Regeneron Ex. 1040, pg 1022
`
`Mylan Ex. 1040, pg 1022
`
`

`
`Immunology: Ochi et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983)
`
`6353
`
`abcde
`
`A
`
`abode
`
`kl:
`
`{;,t2;<rNP2)5 {
`
`ptzxmez _,
`
`1 ,_,,,.,
`
`ya/<2-> 1 --
`).u<mP ->
`
`FIG. 3. Analysis of secreted (unreduced) Ig. The radiolabeled cul-
`ture supernatants as described in the legend to Fig. 2 were analyzed by
`electrophoresis on a NaDodSO4/polyacrylamide gel without reducing
`the disulfide bonds (7). Lane a, X63Ag8; lane b, XR19L4; lane c, igm-
`l0; lane d, IR44L1; and lane e, wild-type hybridoma Sp603. The mark-
`ers indicate the major forms of Sp603 IgM and X63Ag8 IgG1.
`
`with various ;1.- and K-specific DNA sequences (Fig. 4). RNA
`for the )1. heavy chain was detected with a probe from the C“4
`region. The transformants XR19L4 and IR44Ll have bands at
`both 2. 7 and 2.4 kilobases (kb), whereas the parental hybridoma
`Sp603 has only one band at 2.4 kb (Fig. 4A). A genomic probe
`containing the p. membrane-specific exon hybridized only to
`the 2.7-kb band (data not shown). RNAs of 2.7 and 2.4 kb have
`been found to encode the membrane ([4,...) and secreted (/1.5) forms
`of the [L chain, respectively (19-21). These results suggest that,
`whereas Sp603 makes RNA only for the us form, the trans-.
`formants make RNAS for both 14.," and us. However, we have
`been unable to detect membrane IgM— by staining with flu-
`orescent ;.L-specific antibodies. The ,u.m form has a longer poly-
`peptide chain than does the [L5 form and consequently can be
`distinguished from us by its lower mobility in NaDodSO4/
`polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Therefore, we examined
`intracellular p. chains that were biosynthetically radiolabeled in
`the presence of tunicamycin; for each transforrnant we found
`only one )1. band, and this band comigrated with the pl. band of
`Sp6 (results not shown). These observations suggest that either
`the 2.7-kb RNA is not translated or that the it". protein is very
`short-lived in the transformants.
`In a similar manner, the RNA blots were hybridized with a
`probe derived from the KTNp V region. Compared to Sp603 and
`igm-10,
`the transformant XRIQLA was found to make a low
`amount of a 1.2-kb RNA that comigrated with authentic K1-Np
`RNA (Fig. 43).
`Structure of Transferred DNA. To analyze the organization
`of the transferred pR-Sp6 and pR-HL1-Np plasmids in the trans-
`formed cell lines, Baml-II-digested cell DNA was hybridized
`with probes specific for the p.- and K-chain constant region gene
`segments. The C,.1—2 probe used here spans the BamHI re-
`striction site in the C,‘2 exon (Fig. 1). Therefore, a minimum
`of two fragments is expected to be detected with this probe.
`
`kb
`
`l-2_
`
`....mB
`
`FIG. 4. Detection of [L1'Np and KTNp gene sequences in cytoplasmic
`RNA from transformed cell lines. Lanes a, X63Ag8; lanes b, XR19L4;
`lanes c, igm-10; lanes d, IR44L1; and lanes e, Sp603. Ten micrograms
`of total cytoplasmic RNA (9) was denatured with glyoxal, electropho-
`resed through a horizontal 1% agarose gel in 10 mM sodium phosphate
`buffer at pH 6.9, and transferred to nitrocellulose as described by Thomas
`(10). (A) The blot was hybridized with a "P-labeled probe correspond-
`ing to the C,,4 exon. This probe was isolated from the cDNA clone
`pH76p.17 (donated by J. Adams) after digestion with Pst I (18). (B) A
`similar blot was hybridized with a “P-labeled probe containing K-mp
`V-region coding sequences (16). Sizes were estimated by comparison to
`mouse ribosomal 28S and 18S RNA (4.7 and 2.0 kb, respectively).
`
`Two fragments of 6.0 and 16 kbp were detected in the DNA
`of both of the transformants. These correspond to the frag-
`ments generated by BamHI digestion of the intact pR-Sp6 and
`pR-HL-mp plasmids (Fig. 5). In addition, one (XRl9L4) or two
`(IR44L1) extra fragments could be detected in the DNA from
`these cell lines. In parallel experiments, sequences indicative
`of unintegrated pR-TK1 plasmids have not been detected in the
`low molecular weight fraction of the Hirt supematants (25) of
`similarly transformed igk-14 cells (results not shown). Taken
`together, these results suggest that the transferred genes are
`tandemly integrated into the chromosomal DNA of the recip-
`ient cells.
`
`Sanofi/Regeneron Ex. 1040, pg 1023
`
`Mylan Ex. 1040, pg 1023
`
`

`
`6354
`
`Immunology: Ochi et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80 1983)
`
`A
`
`:3
`
`b
`
`c
`
`d
`
`e
`
`1‘
`
`K00
`
`Table 1. Assay of functional IgM-
`Hemolysis titer
`on erythrocytes
`
`-wmaael
`
`”'“" ~
`
`N“
`
`Islands
`
`6.0» W
`
`""""
`
`kbp
`
`
`
`FIG. 5. Detection of pR-Sp6 and pR-HL-mp sequences in DNA from
`transformed cell lines. Lanes a, X63Ag8; lanes b, XR19L4; lan c, igm-
`10; lanes d, lR44L1, lanes .e, Sp603; and lanes f, igm-10 with 5 equiv-
`alents of pR-Sp6. Bamfll-digested DNA samples (20 pg) were electro-
`phoresed through a 1% agarose gel at 2 V-cm‘ 1 for 40 hr and transferred
`to nitrocellulose. (A) A previously hybridized blot (see B) was washed
`according to Thomas (10) and rehybridized to a 32P-labeled probe con-
`taining the C,,1 and C,,2 exons. This probe was prepared by isolation of
`an appropriate fragment from a Xba I/HindlII digestion of a genomic
`clone of the p,-chain constant region gene segment. The bands corre-
`sponding to the iochain geneoontaining fragments generated by Baml-ll
`digestion of pR-Sp6 and PR-l'[L-1-Np are indicated. The two bands ob-
`served in lane e (11 and 14 kbp) correspond to the functionally rear-
`ranged [1-1'N'p gene in thewild-type Sp603 cell line. (B) The same blot
`was hybridized with a “P-labeled probe containing the K-constant re-
`gion genesegment that was isolated from the plasmid pL21-5 (donated
`by R. Wall) (22). The bands at 9.6 kb correspond to the K1-Np gene (16).
`The bandsat 6.9, 5.9, and 5.4 kbp correspond to rearranged K chain genes.
`present in the DNA of the X63Ag8 cell line (23, 24), two of which (5.9
`and 5.4 kbp) were retained in the generation of the original Sp6 hy-
`bridoma. The 5.4-kbp band corresponds to the functionally rearranged
`X63Ag8 K gene and this band is not observed in the case of ig'm-10 (lane
`c). Sizes were estimated by comparison to HindI[I-digested A phage DNA.
`
`The pattern obtained for XR19L4 upon hybridization of the
`same blot with the C, probe is consistent with the above inter-
`pretation. DNA from this transformant contains a 9.6-kbp frag-
`ment corresponding to the wild-type Kmp gene (16) in addition
`
`Phenotype
`IgM, K(TNP)
`+ K(X63)
`K(TNP)
`
`IgG1, K
`
`No Ig
`
`Cell line
`speoa
`
`igm-10
`IR44L1
`
`X63Ag8
`XR19L4‘
`
`Sp2/0Ag14
`SR1.2
`SR40.1
`
`X63Ag8.653
`X653R1.1
`
`No Ig
`
`£ TNP/protein
`Protein A
`TNP
`A ratio
`2‘
`2°
`4
`
`<1
`23
`
`<1
`23
`
`<1
`2‘
`2
`
`<1
`2‘
`
`<1
`2‘
`
`<1
`<1
`
`<1
`2“
`2’
`
`<1
`2‘
`
`—
`4
`
`—
`<1 :8
`
`_
`4
`2
`
`—
`4
`
`As described in the text, the transformants lR44L1 and XR19L4 were ~
`derived by introducing the F/[Np gene alone or the [L1'Ny and K-mp genes
`together into the igm-10 and X63Ag'8 cell lines. Similarly, the cell lines
`SR1.2, SR40.1, and X653R1.1 were generated by transferring the amp ~
`+ K-mp vector DR-'I'III1'Np into Sp2/0Ag14 and X63Ag8.653. The indi-
`cated cell lines were grown to approximately 10° cells per ml,‘ and cul-
`ture supematants were assayed for IgM concentration (lysis titer on
`protein A-coupled erythrocytes) and TNP-specific hemolysis activity
`(lysis titer on TNP-coupled erythrocytes). Culture supernatants were A
`diluted serially 1:2 to obtain the end-point dilution (titer) that still caused
`lysis. The ratio of the TNP and the protein A titer is a measure of the
`specific activity of the secreted IgM. ‘
`
`to other fragments that correspond to the K chain genes en-
`dogenous to the recipient X63Ag8-cell line (23, 24).
`Assay of IgM.Function. We have tested the normal func-
`tioning of the IgM produced by the transformants by assaying
`its action in complement-dependent
`lysis of TNP-coupled
`erythrocytes (Table 1). The IgM concentration in the culture
`supematants of the indicated cell lines was measured. by the
`hemolysis of protein A-coupled erythrocytes in the presence of
`anti-IgM
`These results indicate that IgM made by IR44L1
`has normal activity with regard to TNP binding-and comple-
`ment activation. However, the transformant XR19L4 makes IgM
`that has an activity that is less than 1/30th of the normal activity
`in the TNP-dependent hemolysis assay. X63Ag8 still produces
`the myeloma K chain, and this K chain can be incorporated into
`IgM, thus reducing TNP-specific hemolysis activity (7). To avoid
`this problem of the nonspecific myeloma K chain, the pq-Np +
`K1'Np vector pR-HL-mp was transferred into theanonproducer
`cell lines Sp2/0Agl4 (5) and X63Ag8.653 (4). The. IgM pro-
`duced by transfonnants-of these cell lines has normal activity
`for TNP-specific hemolysis (Table 1).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`We and others have previously reported the expression of Ig
`light chain genes in various cell types (2, 26-29). In this paper
`we have described the construction of plasmids that bear genes
`for TNP-specific immunoglobulin p. and K-chains. The expres-
`sion of these genes was studied after the transferof the plas-
`mids into various cell lines derived from Ig-secreting plasma-
`cytomas or hybridomas. The transfer of these plasmids into these
`cells is usually (see below) sufficient to cause the production of
`pentameric IgM(K) that binds antigen (TNP) and activates com-
`plement‘—that is, these cell lines (X63Ag8, X63Ag8.653, igm-
`10, and Sp2/0Ag14) provide all of’ the machinery necessary for
`IgM production except the structural genes for the )1. and,K
`
`Sanofi/Regeneron Ex. 1040, pg 1024
`
`Mylan Ex. 1040, pg 1024
`
`

`
`Immunology: Ochi et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983)
`
`6355
`
`chains. The capacity to provide this machinery is present de-
`spite the fact that these cell lines have been propagated for years
`without overt selection for this property.
`We expect that this system will be very useful in determining
`the structural requirements for normal IgM production and
`function. To date, the use of genetics for this purpose has been
`limited to the analysis of naturally occurring mutants that in-
`terfere with normal IgM processing and activity (7, 30). Al-
`though such mutans are useful as a starting point, in vitro mu-
`tagenesis offers a more rapid and systematic method of obtaining
`altered IgM. Thus, it should be possible to identify the amino
`acids that are critical for complement activation or Fc receptor
`binding. Similarly, one can expect to define the features that
`are necessary for pentamer formation, glycosylation, and se-
`cretion.
`As is the case with other gene transfer systems, we have found
`that the various transformants produce quite different amounts
`of )1. and K chain, ranging from undetectable to approximately
`normal levels. In general, a linear relationship does not exist
`between the copy number of the transferred sequences and the
`level of Ig gene expression. Studies with transfer vectors pre-
`sumed to be replication incompetent indicate that the trans-
`ferred sequences integrate into ‘different sites in the host chro-
`mosomes,
`independent of the 'method of transfer (31-33).
`Therefore, the context of the transferred genes is different from
`normal and different in each recipient. It is not known whether
`it is the different chromosomal locales that are responsible for
`the variation in the expression of the transferred genes or whether
`these results reflect a high frequency of mutation associated
`with the introduction of exogenous DNA into mammalian cells
`(34, 35).
`The transformants XR19L4 and IR44L1 produce, in addition
`to a 2.4-kb RNA that comigrates with authentic as RNA, a 2.7-
`kb RNA that appears to include the am exon. As we have been
`unable to detect a';1.,,, protein, it is possible that the 2.7-kb RNA
`is aberrant in some respect (36-39). In contrast to the heavy
`chain gene results, the transferred K chain genes in XRIQL4
`and in several transformants derived from igk-14 and the K1-Np
`vector pR-TK1 (ref. 2; unpublished data) produce a single spe-
`cies of RNA that comigrates with authentic K-mp RNA.
`We expect that the variations. in the expression of the trans-
`ferred genes will not interfere with the usefiilness of this sys-
`tem in producing altered IgM for functional analysis. Further-
`more, we anticipate that modifications of» this protocol will -allow
`investigation of the mechanisms controlling Ig gene expression.
`Note Added in Proof. Gillies et al. (40) and Neuberger (41) have re-
`cently reported the expression of cloned heavy chain genes in trans-
`formed lymphoid cells.
`
`We thank Nusrat Covindji and Catherine Filkin for expert technical
`assistance. This work was supported by grants from the Medical Re-
`search Council, the National Cancer Institute, the Arthritis Society, the
`Allstate Foundation, and Hoffmann—La Roche Ltd. A.O. was sup-
`ported by a Terry Fox Cancer Research Fellowship from the National
`Cancer Institute. R.G.H. was supported by a studentship from the
`Medical Research Council.
`
`1. Davies, D. 8: Metzger, H. (1983)Amm. Rev. Immunol. 1, 87-117.
`2. Ochi, A.,.Hawley, R. C., Shulman, M.
`8:’Hozumi, N. (1983)
`Nature (London) 302, 340-342.
`3. Kohler, C-.8:'Milstein, C. (1975) Nature (London) 256, 495-497.
`4.
`-Kearney, J ., Radbruch, A., Liesegang, B. & Rajewsky, K. (1979)
`]. Immunol.:l23, 1548-1550.
`
`5355F5wmumm
`
`l\‘)955:5
`
`N)1"
`
`22.
`
`Shulman, M., Wilde, C. & Kohler, G. (1978) Nature (London) 276,
`269-270.
`Kohler, C. 8: Milstein, C. (1976) Eur. ]. Immunol. 6, 511-519.
`Kohler, C. 8: Shulman, M. (1980) Eur. ]. Immunol. 10, 467-476.
`Kohler, C., Potash, M. J., Lehrach, H. C. 8: Shulman, M. J. (1982)
`EMBO]. 1, 555-563.
`Schibler, U., Marcu, K. B. 8: Perry, R. P. (1978) Cell 15, 1495-
`1509.
`Thomas, PI S. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 5201-5205.
`Cross-Bellard, M., Dudet, P. 8: Chambon, P.
`(1973) Eur. ].
`Bi0chem.36, 32-38.
`Southern, E. M. (1975)). Mol. Biol. 97, 503-517.
`Rigby, P. W. J., Dieckmann, M., Rhodes, C. 8: Berg, P. (1977) ].
`Mol. Biol. 113, 237-251.
`Hozumi, N., Hawley, R. C. 8: Murialdo, H. (1981) Gene 13, 163-
`172.
`Hozumi, N., Wu, C. E., Murialdo, H., Roberts, L., Vetter, D.,
`Fife, W. L., Whiteley, M. & Sadowsld,T. (1981) Proc. Natl.Acad.
`Sci. USA 78, 7019-7023.
`Hawley, R. C., Shulman, M. J., Murialdo, ‘I-1., Gibson, D. M. 8:
`Hozumi, N. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA’79, 7425-7429.
`Southern, P. J. 8: Berg, P. (1982) j. Mol. Appl. Genet. 1, 327-341.
`Cough, N. M., Kemp, D. J., Tyler, B. M., Adams, J. .M. 8: Cory,
`S. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 554-558.
`Alt,‘F. W., Bothwell, A. L. M., Knapp, M., Siden, E., Mather,
`E., Koshland, M. 8: Baltimore, D. (1980) Gell20, 293-301.
`Rogers, J., Early, P., Carter, C., Calame, K., Bond, M., Hood,
`L. 8: Wall, R. (1980) Cell 20, 303-312.
`Early, P., Rogers, J., Davis, M., Calame, K., Bond, M., Wall, R.
`8: Hood, L. (1980) Cell 20, 313-319.
`Wall, R., Gilmore-Hebert, M., Higuchi, .R., Komaromy, M.,
`Paddock, C., Strommer, J. 8: Salser, W. (1978) Nucleic Acids Res.
`5, 3113-3128.
`Storb, U., Arp, B. 8: Wilson, R. (1980) NucleicAcids Res. 8, 4681-
`4687.
`'Walfield, A. M., Storb, U., Selsing, E. 8:.Zentgraf, H. (1980) Nu-
`cleic Acids Res. 8, 4689-4707.
`Hm, B. (1967) 1. Mol. Biol. 26, 365-369.
`Rice, D. 8: Baltimore, D.:(1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79,
`7862-7865.
`Oi, V. T., Morrison, S. L., Herzenberg, L. A. 8: Berg, P. (1983)
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 825-829.
`Falkner, F. C. 8: Zachau, H. C. (1982) Nature (London) 298, 286-
`288.
`Picard, D. 8: Schaffner, W. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80,
`417-421.
`Shulman, M. J., Heusser, C., Filkin, C. 8:-Kiihler, G. (1982) Mol.
`Cell. ‘Biol. 2, 1033-1044.
`Robins," D. M., Ripley, S., Henderson, A. S. 8: Axel, R. (1981)
`Cell 23, 29-39.
`de Saint Vincent, B. R., Delbruk, S., Eckhart, W., -Meinkoth, J.,
`Vitto, L. 3. Wahl, c. (1981) Cell 27, 267-277.
`Fol er, K. R., Wong, E. A., Wahl, C. 8: Capecchi, M. R. (1982)
`M0 . Cell. Biol. 2, 1372-1387.
`Razzaque, A., Mizusawa, H. 8: Seidman, M. M. (1983) Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. USA 80, 3010-3014.
`Calos, M. P., Lebkowski, J. S. 8: Botchan, M. R. (1983) Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. USA 80, 3015-3019.
`Kemp,'D. J., Ham's, A. W. 8: Adams, J. M. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad.
`Sci. USA 77, 7400-7404.
`Alt, F. W., Rosenberg, N., Enea, V., Siden, E. & Baltimore, D.
`(1982) Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 385-400.
`Clarke, C., Berenson, J., Goverman, J., Boyer, P. D., Crews. S.,
`Siu, C. 8: Calame, K. (1982) Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 7731-7749.
`Nelson, K. J., Haimovich, J. 8: Perry, R. P. (1983) Mol. Cell. Biol.
`3, 1317-1332.
`Gillies, S. D., Morrison, S. L., Oi, V. T. 8: Tonegawa, S. (1983)
`Cell 33, 717-728.
`Neuberger, M. S. (1983) EMBO]. 2, 1373-1378.
`
`Sanofi/Regeneron Ex. 1040, pg 1025
`
`Mylan Ex. 1040, pg 1025

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket