throbber
Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 80, pp. 825-829, February 1983
`Immunology
`
`Immunoglobulin gene expression in transformed lymphoid cells
`(gpt/transformation)
`
`VERNON T. 01*, Srnzrurs L. Moruusom‘, LEONARD A. HERZENBERC*, AND PAUL Brtnci
`ent of Microbiology and the Cancer
`De
`ents of ‘Genetics and iliiochemistry, Stanford University
`partm
`School of Medicine, Stanford, Califomia 94305: and 3De
`Center, Institute ofCancer Research, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New Yorlt, New York 1
`
`Contributed by Leonard A. I-Ierzenberg, October 15, 1982
`
`Myeloma, hybridoma, and thymoma cell lines
`ABSTRACT
`have been successfully transfected for the Escherichia cola’ xan-
`thine-guanine phosphorihosyltransferase gene (gpt) by using the
`plasmid vector pSV2-gpt. The transformed cells synthesize the
`bacterial enzyme 5-phospho-at-D-ribose-l-diphosphatezxanthine
`phosphoribosyltransferase (XGPRT; EC 2.4.2.22) and have been
`maintained in selective medium for over 4 months. Lymphoid cell
`lines expressing a K immunoglobulin light chain were obtained by
`transfecting cells with pSV2-gpt containing a rearranged K light
`chain genomic segment from the S107 myeloma cell line. The $107
`light chain is synthesized in gpt-transformed ]558L myeloma cells
`and is identical to the light chain synthesized by the S107 myeloma
`cell line, as judged by immunoprecipitation and two-dimensional
`gel electrophoresis. Furthermore, this light chain is synthesized
`and secreted as part ofan intact antibody molecule by transfonned
`hybridoma cells that normally secrete an IgGl (y,K) antibody
`molecule. No light chain synthesis was detected in a similarly
`transformed rat myeloma or a mouse thymoma line.
`
`Techniques to introduce novel genes into eukaryotic cells pro
`vide a powerful tool to study mechanisms ofgene regulation and
`expression. Most studies on eukaryotic gene expression have
`been conducted in heterologous host cells—i.e., genes have
`been transfected into cell types (particularly human HeLa and
`mouse L cells) that normally do not express the gene ofinterest
`(1-3). Though a great deal has been learned about eukaryotic
`regulator sequences with these gene transfer experiments, it
`would be preferable to transfer genes encoding proteins ex-
`pressed during diflerentiation back into the cell type that nor-
`mally expresses the genes ofinterest. The appropriate cell type
`provides protein modification systems, such as glycosyltrans-
`ferases, necessary to make fully biological functional products.
`In addition, the appropriate cell type may be used to study tis-
`sue-specific regulation of gene expression.
`To undertake studies of (i) the regulation and expression of
`immunoglobulin genes, (ii) the biosynthesis, chain-assembly,
`and secretion of immunoglobulin heavy and light chains, and
`(iii) structure—function correlates of antibody molecules, we
`have explored techniques for transfection of lymphoid cells us-
`ing the pSV2-gpt vector (4, 5). This DNA can express the Eco
`gpt gene encoding xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase
`(XGPRT; 5-phospho-at-D-ribose-l-diphosphatezxanthine phos-
`phoribosyltransferase, EC 2.4.2.22). Cells synthesizing XCPRT
`can be grown with xanthine as the sole precursor of guanine
`nucleotide formation (4, 5). Successfully transformed cells can
`be isolated by their ability to grow in medium containing xan-
`thine and mycophenolic acid, an inhibitor of guanine nucleotide
`synthesis; if the transfomred cell line is hypoxanthine phos-
`phoribosyltransferase-negative (HPRT'; IMP pyrophosphate
`phosphoribosyltransferase, EC 2.4.2.8), transformants can he
`
`The publication costs ofthis article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertise-
`ment” in accordance with 18 U. S. C. §l734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`825
`
`selected in hypoxanthine/aminopterin/thymidine (HAT) me-
`dium (6). In the_present experiments both calcium phosphate
`precipitation (7, 8) and protoplast fusion (9) techniques have
`been used to transfect cells.
`pSV2-gpt containing a rearranged K light chain gene (10) was
`used to transform several cultured lymphoid cell lines. Among
`the gpt transformants were clones that produce a new immu-
`noglobulin light chain. The light chain produced by these trans-
`formed cell lines appears to be identical to the light chain syn-
`thesized by the myeloma cell from which the rearranged gene
`was isolated. Furthermore, in transfonned hybridoma cells,
`this light chain is assembled with an immunoglobulin heavy
`chain and secreted as a complete antibody molecule.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Cell Lines. ]558L is a spontaneous heavy chain-loss-variant
`myeloma cell line obtained from the ]558 cell line [a,/\; anti-al-
`3 dextr-an (ll)] that synthesizes and secretes a A light chain. Y3-
`Agl.2.3 is a HPRTrat myeloma cell line originally described
`by Galfre et al (12) that synthesizes and secretes a rat K light
`chain. 27-44 is a HPBT‘ mouse IgC1 anti-dansyl hybridoma cell
`line (13); and BWSI47 is a HPRT‘, ouabain' AKR thymoma
`originally described by Hyman and Stallings (14). Cell lines
`were maintained in either 10% newborn calf serum in Dul-
`becco’s modified minimal essential medium (DME medium) or
`10% fetal calf serum in alpha modified minimal essential me-
`dium.
`Recombinant DNA Vectors. The plasmid vector pSV2-gpt
`has been described (4, 5). Fig. 1 shows a partial restriction en-
`zyme map ofthis vector. A second vector, which is derived from
`pSV2-gpt, but contains the herpes simplex thymidine kinase
`promoter inserted 5’ of the gpt gene, was constructed by ].—F.
`Nicolas (unpublished data). pSV2-S107 was constructed by in-
`serting a BamHI fragment containing the entire rearranged
`phosphocholine-specific K chain gene from the S107 myeloma
`cell line (10) into the unique BamHI site in pSV2-gpt. The light
`chain gene is oriented so that the direction of transcription is
`opposite to the gpt gene (Fig. 1). The genomic rearranged S107
`K light chain DNA was a gift from M. Scharff.
`Transfection by Protoplast Fusion. Protoplasts were pre-
`pared essentially as described by Sandri-Coldin et al. (9). Each-
`erichia coli K-12 strain HB 101, containing the appropriate plas-
`mid, was grown at 37°C in Luria broth containing 1% glucose
`to an absorbance at 600 nm of 0.6—0.8. Chloramphenicol was
`added to 125 p.g/ml, the culture was incubated at 37°C for 12-
`16 hr to amplify the plasmid copy number, and the cells were
`harvested by centrifugation. For every 25 ml of culture, 1.25
`ml of chilled 20% sucrose/0.05 M Tr-is'HCl (pH 8) was added;
`
`Abbreviations: XCPRT, xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase;
`HPRT, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase; HAT, hypoxanthine/
`aminopterin/thymidine; DME medium, Dulbeccds modified minimal
`essential medium.
`
`Sanofi/Regeneron Ex. 1031, pg 915
`
`Mylan Ex. 1031, pg 915
`
`

`
`826
`
`Immunology: Oi et al.
`
`Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983)
`
`pBR322 mi
`
`Ampn
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 1. Structure of the vectors
`used for lymphoid cell transforma-
`tions. The diagram of the parental
`pSV2-gpt plasmid vector was taken
`from Mulligan and Berg (4, 5): pBR322
`DNA is represented by the solid black
`lines and the pla.smid’s DNA replica-
`tion origin and B-lactamase gene are
`indicated; the git gene sequence is
`represented by the hatched segments;
`simian virus 40 (SV40) sequences are
`the stippled segments. The SV40 ori-
`gin of DNA replication (ori) and early
`promoter are located 5' of the gpt se-
`quences. pSV2-gptTKpr has an inser-
`tion of 250 base pairs, containing the
`herpes simplex thymidine kinase pro-
`moter, between the gpt gene and the
`SV40 early promoter (unpublished
`data). pSV2-S107 has a 7-kilobase
`Baml-II fragment, containing the en-
`tire genomic S107 light chain gene,
`inserted into the unique BamHI site
`of pSV2-gpt. This rearranged light
`chain gene is oriented in the opposite
`direction togpt and contains the leader,
`V, and x constant region exons as well
`as flanking 5’ and 3’ sequences.
`
`the bacteria were suspended and 0.25 ml of lysozyme [a freshly
`prepared solution of 5 mg/ml in 0.25 M Tris-HCI (pH 8)] was
`added. After 5 min ofincubation on ice, 0.5 ml of 0.25 M EDTA
`(pH 8) was added and incubation on ice was continued for an
`additional 5 min. After addition of 0.5 ml of 0.05 M Tris'HCl
`(pH 8), the bacteria were transferred to a 37°C water bath and
`were incubated for 10 min. At this time examination of the bac-
`teria with a phase-contrast microscope showed that the vast
`majority had been converted to protoplasts. The bacteria were
`diluted with 10 ml of DME medium containing 10% sucrose
`and 10 mM MgCl2 that was warmed to 87°C. After further in-
`cubation for 10 min at room temperature the protoplasts were
`ready for fusion.
`Fusion of protoplasts with suspension cells was effected with
`a procedure normally used in the production of hybridomas
`(15). Cell lines were grown to a density of 0.3-1 X 106 cells per
`ml in DME medium supplemented with 10% newborn calf
`serum. Five milliliters of the protoplast suspension was added
`to 2 X 106 cells in growth medium. The mixture was centrifuged
`for 5 min at room temperature at approximately 500 X g. The
`supemate was aspirated and the pellet was resuspended gently
`in 2 ml of a polyethylene glycol solution [50 g of polyethylene
`glycol 1,500 (BDH) in 50 ml of DME medium] adjusted to pH
`8 with C02. After 3 min of centrifugation at 500 X g the poly-
`ethylene glycol was diluted with 7 ml of DME medium while
`resuspending the pellet. After 5 min of centrifugation at 500
`X g, the supemate was removed carefully and the cells were
`resuspended in DME medium containing 10% newborn calf
`serum and garamycin at 100 pg/ml and were plated either in
`96-well or 24-well plates. After 48 hr, cells were diluted with
`an equal volume of DME medium containing xanthine at
`;Lg/ml, hypoxanthine at 15 pg/ml, mycophenolic acid at 6 ;1g/
`ml, and 10% newborn calf serum. Every several days, as re-
`quired, spent medium was aspirated carefully and was replaced
`with fresh medium containing the same supplements. Colonies
`of transfonnants were visible by 10 days. Transformants were
`maintained in selective medium.
`Transfection by Calcium Phosphate Precipitation. Lym-
`phoid cell lines grown in suspension were transfected by cal-
`cium phosphate precipitation as described by Chu and Sharp
`(7). Ten times concentrated HeBS buffer was stored at -20°C
`
`until used, whereupon it was diluted to two times concentrated
`and adjusted to pH 7.05. Plasmid DNA (80 pg/ml) was made
`up in 125 mM CaCl2 which was stored as a 2 M stock solution
`at -20°C. DNA-mlcium phosphate precipitates were formed
`by dropwise addition of the DNA into the HeBS solution. The
`precipitate formed in 30 min at room temperature. The final
`DNA concentration was 40 pg/ml.
`Cells were washed once in serum-free medium and were
`suspended directly in the DNA-calcium phosphate precipitate
`(106 cells per 20 pg of DNA per 0.5 ml). This suspension was
`incubated at 37°C for 30 min and then was diluted 1:10 in
`serum-containing medium. The cells were plated either into 24-
`well plates (2 X 105 cells per well) or 96-well plates (2 X 10‘
`cells per well). Transfection of Y3 cells was done as described
`by Graham and Van der Eb (8) for adherent cell lines. The DNA-
`calcium phosphate precipitate was put directly onto the cell
`monolayer. After 30 min at 37°C, serum-containing medium
`was added. After 24 hr, half of the medium volume from each
`culture was removed and was replaced with fresh medium. On
`days 3, 4, 5, 8, 11, and 14, half the medium volume was re-
`moved and HAT medium was added. Transformed colonies
`were visible between 10 and 21 days.
`Immunoprecipitations and Cel Electrophoresis. Immuno-
`precipitations were done with [”S]methionine-labeled cell ly-
`sates and supemates. Biosynthetic labeling procedures have
`been described (16). Rabbit anti-mouse light chains, rabbit anti-
`mouse K light chains, rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin, and
`a hybridoma anti-mouse IgGl allotype antibody were used for
`immunoprecipitations. Staphylococcus aureus, Cowan strain 1
`(IgCsorb; Enzyme Center, Boston) was used to coprecipitate
`the antigen—antibody complexes (16).
`One-dimensional NaDodSO4/polyacrylamide slab electro-
`phoresis and two-dimensional nonequilibrium gradient gel
`electrophoresis were done as described (17). Autoradiography
`ofpolyacrylamide gels was with preflashed XAR-5 film and fluo-
`rography by using sodium salicylate (18).
`
`RESULTS
`
`Transfection Frequencies. The frequency at which stable
`transformed lymphoid cell lines were generated was influenced
`
`Sanofi/Regeneron Ex. 1031, pg 916
`
`Mylan Ex. 1031, pg 916
`
`

`
`Immunology: Oi et at
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA so (1983)
`
`827
`
`Table 2. Transformation of lymphoid cell lin with the pSV2-
`gptvectors by using calcium phosphate precipitation
`Cell line
`27-44
`
`BW5147
`
`Vector
`
`Y3
`
`pSV2-gpt
`pSV2-g‘ptTKpt‘
`pSV2-S107
`
`3/48‘
`19/48*
`47/48*
`
`10/192*
`10/192*
`43/288*
`
`1/192*
`1/192*
`0/192*
`
`Results are from three experiments with the Y3-cell line and two
`experiments with 27-44»and BW5147 cell lines.
`’ Cells were plated in 24-well culture dishes at 2 X 10‘ cells per well."
`7 Cells were plated-in 9l‘rwell culture dishes at 4 X 10‘ cells per well.
`
`Ofthe four cell lines stably transformed with pSV2-S 107, the
`]558L cell line synthesized, but didnot secrete, the S 107 K light
`chain. However, this cell line was not expected to secrete the
`newly made light chains because heavy chain-loss-variants of
`the S107 myeloma cell line also do not secrete endogenous light
`chains (M. Scharlf, personal communication). Transforrnants of
`the 27-44 hybridoma cell line synthesized and secreted the S107
`light chain. Moreover, the S107 light chain was assembled into
`tetrameric H,L2 immunoglobulin molecules with the endoge-
`nous yl heavy chainand was secreted.- Twelve independently
`transformed Y3 and seven BW5147 cell lines did not produce
`detectable amounts ‘of the. S107 light chain, as judged by im-
`munoprecipitation andgel analyses. XCPRT analyses verified
`that these- cells were, indeed, transformants.
`Autoradiograms of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels
`showing the apparent M,‘ and charge of the light chains pro-
`duced by ]558L and 27-44 transformants are shown in Figs. 3
`and 4. The two-dimensional gel pattern. of the S107 light chain .
`synthesized by $107 myeloma cells is included to show that the
`transformed cell lines produced a light chain that is identical
`in apparent M, and charge. The two-dimensional gel patterns
`also show that the leader polypeptide was removed in trans-
`formed cell lines that expressed the light chain. This indicates
`that proper transcription, mRNA, and protein processing occur
`in the transfonnants. Transcription of the S107 light chain gene
`probably occurs from its own promoter, because the light chain
`gene is oriented opposite to the direction of the SV40 early pro-
`moter (see Fig. 1).
`The antibodies secreted by 27-44 transformants were im-
`munoprecipitated with both hybridoma anti-IgCl allotypic an-
`tibody and rabbit anti-mouse light chain antisera. Both reagents
`precipitated the S107 light chain (data not shown). Sequential
`precipitation, first with the hybridoma anti-IgCl antibody and
`
`1
`
`2
`
`FIG. 2. XGPRT and I-[PRT production in transformed lymphoid
`cell lines. Enzyme analyses were done as described by Mulligan and
`Berg (4, 5). Lanes: 1 and 2, electrophoretic mobility of mammalian
`HPRT; 3-5, J558L cell transformants; and 6 and 7, transformants of
`the 27-44 cell line. Because 27-44~is a HPRT.‘ cell line, only XGPRT
`is present.
`
`Sanofi/Regeneron Ex. 1031, pg 917
`
`Mylan Ex. 1031, pg 917
`
`by every parameter tested. Different cell lines and different
`vectors produced different transformation frequencies. More-
`over, the two DNA delivery procedures, protoplast firsion and
`calcium phosphate precipitation, yielded different
`transfor-
`mation frequencies. Tables land 2 summarize the results by"
`using protoplast fusion and calcium phosphate precipitation,
`respectively.
`Under the present experimental conditions, BW5l47 ap-
`pears tobe the least competent recipient ofthe cell lines tested,
`having a transformation frequency of approximately 10'“. Y3
`and 27-44 yielded frequencies in the rangeof0.3 to >5.>< 10’°.
`In- the present experiments, ]558L yielded the highest fre-
`quency with the range of 3 X l0'° to >10". Protoplast firsion
`appears on balance to be a more efficient delivery system than ~
`calcium phosphate precipitation.
`A striking feature of these results is the enhanced transfor- ‘
`mation frequency for gpt obtained with the light chain-contain-
`ing vector, pSV2-S107. This dramatic increase is evident when
`the pSV2-S107 vector was used with the ]558L and Y3 myeloma
`cell lines; transformation with this recombinant was 5- to at least
`10-fold greater than that obtained with the other. vectors. Trans-
`formation of the hybridoma 27-44 ‘cell line was increased only
`about 2-fold with pSV2-S107. The sequence(s) in the pSV2-S107
`insert that is responsible for the enhanced transformation fre-
`quency must yet be mapped. Transformation of the Y3 cell line
`was occasionally greater with pSV2-gpt-'I'l(pr than with pSV2-
`gpt (Table 2). Regardless of which vector was used, BW5l47
`transformants were detected only at ‘very low frequencies. The
`amount of XGPRT activity in cell lines stably transformed by
`the three recombinant plasmids was not significantly different
`(Fig. 2 and data not shown).
`XGPRT Activity. The transformed cell lines expressedvthe
`Eco gpt gene, as measuredby the presence of XCPRT activity
`in the cell lysates. E. colt‘ XGPRT can be distinguished from
`mammalian HPRT activity by its different electrophoretic mo-.
`bility (4, 5). In cells selected for resistance to mycophenolic acid,
`both the cellular HPRT and bacterial XGPBT activities were
`detectable (Fig. 2). Cells lacking their own HPRT activity and
`selected for gpt in HAT medium had only the bacterial enzyme
`activity (Fig. 2).
`Immunoglobulin Light Chain Expression. The organization
`of exons in the S107 genomic light chain gene is shown in Fig.
`1. To produce the S107 light chain protein from this gene, two
`introns must be processed fiom the primary mRNA transcripts
`and the leader polypeptide removed by post-translational cleav-
`age. For secretion of the light chain as part of an intact antibody
`molecule, the newly synthesized light chain must fold and as-
`semble with an immunoglobulin heavy chain to form an H214
`tetramer. This also involves the fonnation of interchain disul-
`fide bonds.
`
`-
`
`Table 1. Transformation of lymphoid cell lina with the
`pSV2-g-pt vectors by usingprotoplast fusion
`Cell line
`
`Vector
`
`J558L
`
`BW5147
`
`0/76‘ 1/48*
`0/80‘ 1/48*
`4/96* 8/48'
`
`pSV2-gpt
`pSV2-gptTKpr
`pSV2-S107
`
`21/288‘ 27/36*
`10/190‘ 24/36*
`186/192‘ 36/367
`149/192:
`Results are from three experiments and are expressed as the number
`of culture wells having stable transformants.
`' Alter pmtoplast fusion cells were plated in 96-well culture dishes at
`10‘ cells per well.
`1 Cells were plated at 10‘ cells per 2.0 ml of culture in 24-well dishes.
`1 Cells were plated at 5 X 103 cells per well in 96-well cultu.re.disbes.
`
`

`
`828
`
`Immunology: Oi et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983)
`
`:0 ‘ Eiiifilfi
`V,
`87mm
`
`fi3rCi5}iC
`Q
`
`,r,,_;(
`
`.
`
`gas '5
`
`8§\$lC§
`
`I
`
`,
`'
`
`-;
`
`“K
`
`g .,
`
`‘
`
`ACKEFC
`
`A
`
`*3
`
`'5
`
`‘£1
`
`{I
`
`ii}
`
`E
`
`Vas ,
`
`1‘
`31 §3?§:‘
`
`'
`i
`$558 sh
`
`3g .
`
`20 --
`
`4‘
`33
`20 -'
`
`3'5 «M-.
`
`E0 «»
`
`31) -~
`
`28 4......
`
`3:0 «M»
`
`2:2»
`
`nltwflfls‘
`
`fir
`
`""‘“2}’~ét3i<
`
`4«“’3H37€
`4. ..
`
`ii
`
`,
`
`g
`V
`I
`«W .
`
`C
`
`*,_/33073:‘
`'
`““‘~:~.~*';‘««Mx
`
`£3
`
`1/5197K
`use wt
`"“27-:“3{i-3<
`
`35......
`
`30 "
`
`2%
`ti7«w
`
`,,,,,,,.
`
`~
`33
`2‘.f)-~
`
`:57
`
`3;} ......
`2i)...
`5?
`
`......
`
`33 ....>4‘
`
`23
`
`FIG. 3. S107 light chain produced by transformed 27-44 cells. Au-
`toradiograms of twtrdimensional gels of the light and heavy chains
`produced by parental and transformed cell lines are shown. (A) Pa-
`rental 27-44 IgG1 anti-dansyl antibody immunoprecipitated with an
`anti-IgG1-specific hybridoma antibody. Both the yl heavy and x light
`chains can be seen. (B) S107 IgA antibody immunoprecipitated with
`a rabbit anti-IgA antiserum. The a heavy chain was distinguished
`clearly by charge and apparent M, from the )4] heavy chain in A. (C)
`A mixture of the immunoprecipitates of A and B. The two at light
`chains can be seen as distinct spots (indicated by arrows) having
`nearly identical charge but different apparent M, (D) Immunoprecip-
`itate of a transformed 27-44 cell line. Only the 141 heavy chain was
`present, but two light chains can be seen. In this case the amount of
`S107 light chain was considerably lower than in the artificial mixture
`shown in C.
`
`then with the rabbit anti—K antisera, indicated that little, if any,
`free S 107 light chain was secreted by these cells. This shows that
`the S107 light chain is assembled with the 71 heavy chain into
`an intact antibody molecule.
`Different amounts of S107 light chains were produced when
`a number of independent ]558L and 27-44 transformants were
`
`FIG. 4. S107 light chain produced by transformed J558L cells. Au-
`toradiogrsms of two-dimensional gels of light chains immunoprecip-
`itated from cell lysates of J558L transformed with pSV2-S107 DNA
`are shown. Because J558L does not produce a heavy chain, only the
`light chain portions of the two-dimensional gels are shown. (A) A light
`chain produced by the parental J558L cell line. (B) S107 x light chain.
`(C) A mixture of the two light chains. The K and A light chains are
`distinguished on the basis of both charge and apparent M, (D and E)
`Two independently derived J558L cell lines transformed with pSV2-
`S107 DNA. The tranaformant examined in D only appears to produce
`larger quantifies of the S107 1: light chain than the endogenous J558
`A light chain, because the S107 K chain is synthesized and remains in
`the cytoplasm, while the J558 A chain is synthesized and secreted.
`
`compared. Amounts varied from barely detectable to quantities
`equal to endogenous light chain. This variation may be due to
`the chromosomal region where the light chain has integrated.
`It also could result from different copy number ofthe light chain
`gene in different transformants. Quite possibly, mutations or
`deletions of sequences needed for the expression of this gene
`could have occurred during transformation or subsequent to
`integration of the light chain sequence. Further studies are
`needed to detennine the cause of this variation and why light
`chain expression does not occur in Y3 or BWSI47 cell lines
`transfonned with the same light chain gene vector.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`These experiments show that it is possible to use two methods,
`calcium phosphate precipitation and protoplast fusion, to intro-
`duce genes into lymphoid cells. With pSV2-gpt containing the
`gene for an immunoglobulin light chain (pSV2-S107) both meth-
`ods give rise to transformants that synthesize bacterial XGPRT
`and the murine light chain. Higher transfonnation frequencies
`are seen following protoplast fusion. Indeed, by using protoplast
`fusion and the pSV2-S107 plasmid, transformants can be ob-
`tained at a frequency of greater than 10“. Transformation fre-
`quencies are lower when using the other plasmids or calcium
`phosphate precipitation. Because mycophenolic acid resistance
`or reversion of the HPRT' phenotype do not occur sponta-
`neously in the cell lines used, stable transformation, at even low
`frequencies, can be detected.
`A surprising result is the increased frequency of gpt trans-
`formation when the SIO7 light chain is incorporated into the
`
`Sanofi/Regeneron Ex. 1031, pg 918
`
`Mylan Ex. 1031, pg 918
`
`

`
`Immunology: Oi et al
`
`Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983)
`
`829
`
`pSV2-gpt vector. This enhancing effect occurs with both the rat
`and mouse myelomas». A similar increased transformation fre-
`quency has been observed with a bovine papillomavirus vector
`containing the human B-globin region sequences (19). At pres-
`ent, the mechanism for the increased transformation frequency
`in both cases is obscure. Possibly, the chromosomal DNA pro-
`vides an origin of DNA replication, which permits the plasmid
`to replicate within the transformed cell and increases the trans-
`formation frequency. Transcription fi'om the immunoglobulin
`promoter cannot be essential for the increased transformation
`frequencies because deletion of the fragments that are pre-
`sumed to contain the immunoglobulin promoter region does not
`abolish the ‘enhancement of transformation. It also is possible
`that pSV2-S107 is more efficient for transformation because of
`increased XCPRT production;
`this seems unlikely because
`there are no consistent differences in enzyme levels in the stable
`transformants obtained with either vector.
`DNA-mediated gene transfer into lymphoid cells may permit
`a study of the regulation and expression of immunoglobulin
`genes in cells in which they normally are synthesized. It may
`be possible to examine the basis for differential immunoglobulin
`gene expression at different stages of lymphocyte differentia-
`tion. Cell lines in which immunoglobulin synthesis (:31. be in-
`duced (20-22) are suitable hosts to determine if the transduced
`immunoglobulin genes also are responsive to those signals.
`Studies with cells transformed with genetic elements that are
`inducible by steroid hormones demonstrate that transduced
`DNA can respond, if thecell contains the appropriate receptors‘
`
`A question of central importance is what determines the uti-
`lization of various promoters and thus the synthesis of defined
`proteins in certain cell lines. In our experiments light chains
`are elliciently produced in both transformed mouse myeloma
`and hybridoma cell lines. However, light chain production did
`not occur in either a rat myeloma or a mouse thymoma. The
`inability of the immunoglobulin promoter to function in a dif-
`ferent species has been reported by Falkner and Zachau (24).
`The lack of production of mouse immunoglobulin in a rat my-
`eloma is surprising because mouse myelomas have been used
`to fuse to rat myelomas. to produce hybrid cells that synthesize
`both rat and mouse immunoglobulin molecules (25). The pos-
`sibility that the S107 light chain is synthesized but rapidly de-
`yaded in the Y3 myeloma has not been excluded.
`There is evidence that differentiated cell types express im-
`munoglobulin genes to varyinglevels. For example, somatic cell
`hybridization of myelomas yields hybridomas that produce an-
`tibodies, whereas thymomas yield hybrid cells with T-cell phe-
`notypes (26). Furthermore, hybridization of myelomas with
`non-B cells results in cessation of immunoglobulin production
`(26, 27).. The lack of light chain expression in the transformed
`thymoma may reflect tissue-specific gene regulation. It is im-
`portant to determine if immunoglobulin gene expression in the
`nonexpressing mouse thymoma and rat myeloma cell lines is
`regulated at the level of transcription, RNA processing, trans-
`lation, or rapid protein turnover.
`The study of the structure and function of the immunoglob-
`ulin molecule has been of great interest, both because of the
`ability of immunoglobulin to react with a diverse family of li-
`gands and also because of the biologic importance of antibody
`molecules. Initially, the study of immunoglobulins was limited
`to the study of heterogeneous serum pools after immunization.
`The advent of myelomas, and more recently hybridomas, has
`permitted the study ofhomogeneous populations ofantibodies.
`DNA-mediated transfection and immunoglobulin gene expres-
`sion is an important tool to permit the study of immunoglobulin
`
`molecules. By using this technique, it should be possible to
`study the function of both novel chain combinations and novel
`chain structures. In vitro site-specific mutagenesis techniques
`can be used to construct specific mutations in immunoglobulin
`genes that can be expressed after transfection. Because signif-
`icant quantities of immunoglobulin are produced in the trans-
`fonnants, sufficient quantities of protein necessary for detailed
`analyses should be obtained.
`Note Added in Proof. After this paper was submitted for. publication,
`we leamed that Douglas Rice and David Baltimore have reported sim-
`ilar results with a different K light chain gene and different lymphoid
`cell recipients (28).
`We thank Dr. P. Jones for assistance with two-dimensional gel elec-
`trophoresis. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
`Health Grants CM-13235, CA-15513 (P.B.), AI-08917 (L.A.H.), CA-
`16858 (S. L. M.), CA-22736 (S. L. M.), and CA-13696 to The Cancer Cen-
`ter of Columbia University and by a grant from the Becton Dickinson
`FACS Systems (L.A.H.). S.L.M.
`is a recipient of Research Career
`Development Award AI—00408.
`1. Mantei, N., Boll, W. 8: Weissmann, C. (1979) Nature (London)
`281, 40-46.
`Mellon, P., Parker, V., Gluzman, Y. & Maniatis, T. (1981) Cell
`27, 279-288.
`3. Mantei, N. & Weissmann, C. (1982) Nature (London) 297, 128-
`132.
`4. Mulligan, 11. C. & Berg, P. (1980) Science 209, 1422-1427.
`5. Mulligan, R. C. & Berg, P. (1981) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78,
`2072-2076.
`I..1'ttlelield, J. w. (1964) Science 145, 709-710.
`5.
`7. Cllu, G. & Sharp, P. A. (1981) Gene 13, 197-202'.
`8. Crallam, F. L. & Van der Eb, A.
`(1973)]. Virol 52, 455-456.
`9. Sandri-Goldin, R. M., Goldin, A. L., Levine, M. & Glorioso, J.
`C. (1981) Mol Cell. Biol 1, 743-752
`10. Kwan, S.-P., Rudilcolf, 5., Seidman, J. G., Leder, P. 8: Scharlf,
`M. 1). (1981) 1. Exp. Med. 15:1, 1366-1370;
`11. Lundblad, A., Steller, R., Kahat, E. A., Hirst, J. W., Weigert,
`M. C. & Cohn, M. (1972) Immunochemistry 9, 535-544.
`12. Galfre, C., Milstein, C. & Wright, B’. (1979) Nature (London)
`277, 131-133.
`13. Dang], J. L., Parks, D. 11., Oi, v.. T. 3; Herzenberg, L. A. (1982)
`Cytometry 2, 395-401.
`‘ljlsyman-, R. & Stallings, V. (1974) J. Natl Cancer Inst. 52, 429-
`14.
`15. Sharon, J., Morrison, S. L. & Kabat, E. A. (1979) Proa Natl
`Acad. Sci. USA 76, 1420-1424.
`16. Oi, V. T., Bryan, V. M., Herzenberg, L. A. & Herzenberg, L.
`A. (1980) J. Earp. Med. 151, 1260-1274.
`17. Oi, V. T., Jones, P. P., Coding, J. W., Herzenberg, L. A. 8:
`Hemenberg, L. A.
`(1978) Curr. Top. Microbiol Immunol 81,
`115-129.
`18. Moosic, J. P., Sung, E., Nilson, A., Jones, P. 8: McKean, D. J.
`(l982)]. Biol Chem. 257, 9684-9691.
`- 19. Di Maio, 0., Trcisman, R. 8: Maniatis, T. (1982) Proc. Natl Acad.
`Sci. USA 79, 4030-4034.
`Paige, c. 1., Kincade, P. w. & Ralph, P. (1978) J. Immunol 121,
`641-647.
`21. Knapp, M. R., Severinson-Gronowicz, E.,. Schroder, J. 8:
`Strober, s. (1979) J. Immunol 123, 1000-1006.
`22. Boyd, A. W., Coding, J. W. & Schrader, J. W. (1981) ] . Immunol
`125, 1261-1255.
`23. Lee, F., Mulligan, R., Berg, P. 8: Ringold, G. (1981) Nature
`(London) 294, 228-232.
` 2(g1§ F. C. 8: Zachau, H. C. (1982) Nature»(I..ondon) 298,
`24.
`‘Czotton, R. C. H. & Milstein, C. (1973) Nature (London) 244, 42-
`25.
`26. Goldsby, R. A., Osborne, B. A., Simpson, E. 8: Herzenberg-, L.
`A. (1977) Nature (London) 267, 707-708.
`27. Cotfino, P., Knowles,.B., Nathenson, S. C. & Scharff, M. D.
`(1971) Nature
`231, 87—fX).
`28. Rice, D. & Baltimore, D. (1982) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79,
`7862-7865.
`
`20.
`
`Sanofi/Regeneron Ex. 1031, pg 919
`
`Mylan Ex. 1031, pg 919

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket