throbber
Filing or 371 (C) Date:
`
`
`Application Typc:
`
`
`Examiner Name:
`
`
`
`Group Art Unit:
`Confirmation Number:
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`Class / Subclass:
`
`
`
`First Named Inventor:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`\\ \\ .2 .
`
`
`09-26-2003
`
`Utility
`
`LEWIS, MONICA
`
`2822
`9439
`
`
`
`ELM-2 CONT. 4
`43 8/238
`
`
`Glenn Leedyw, Saline, MI
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Three dimensional multi layer memory and control logic
`
`
`
`integrated circuit structure
`
`
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Alexandria, VA 223l3—l450
`
`
`
`Sir:
`
`
`
`RESPONSE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Rcsponsivc to the Office Action of 04/24/2009, plcasc amend this application as
`
`follows.
`
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 1 of 15
`
`

`
`IN THE CLAIMS
`
`
`
`
`
`l-87. (Canceled)
`
`
`
`88.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Currently Amended) An integrated circuit structure comprising:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a first substrate comprising a first surface having interconnect contacts
`
`and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a thinned second substrate comprising a first surface and a second sttrtace
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`each having interconnect contacts ’ ‘ *‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`. wherein the second surlace is U 3 Josile
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the iirst Stll‘iilCC Zil1CiM\\.‘i‘tCl'Cil} the SeCong_§“t:Lij}1ce oiithe second substrate is polished; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`onductive paths between the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`interconnect contacts of the first surfaces of the first substrate and said one (‘>i'I‘i1t’.‘ first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SllI‘i’1lCC otthc second substrate and the second stii'i2»tc<: ol’t’ltc sccontl substrate.~.~«\-¢li<=+ei+s
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wherein the iirst surlace olthe first substrate and one ol"thc iirstfi sttt'lacq__Q_l_'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the second substrate and the second surfitcc of the second substrate are bonded, the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` substrate overlapping at leasta majority of the fia=st-sur~t”~aee—ef3—t~he
`tirstsecond substrate.
`
`
`
`A
`
`
`89.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 88, wherein the second
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate is one ofa thinned monocrystalline semiconductor substrate and a thinned
`
`
`
`
`
`polycrystalline semiconductor substrate.
`
`
`
`
`90.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus of claim 88, wherein the circuitry
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formed on the second substrate is one of active circuitry and passive circuitry.
`
`
`
`
`91.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 88, wherein the circuitry
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formed on the second substrate consists of both active circuitry and passive circuitry.
`
`
`
`
`92.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 88, wherein the first substrate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is a substrate having circuitry formed thereon.
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 2 of 15
`
`

`
`
`93.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus of claim 92, wherein the circuitry of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the first substrate is one of active circuitry and passive circuitry.
`
`I
`
`94.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus of claim 92, wherein the circuitry of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the first substrate comprises both active circuitry and passive circuitry.
`
`
`95.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure of claim 88, further
`
`
`comprising:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least one additional thinned substrate having circuitry formed thereon;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a first of said at least one additional thinned substrate being bonded to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second substrate and any additional thinned substrates being bonded to the directly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`adjacent additional thinned substrate; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conductive paths formed between said first of said at least one additional '
`thinned substrate and at least one of said first and second substrates and also between
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`each additional thinned substrate and at least one of said substrates of the integrated
`circuit structure.
`
`
`
`
`
`96.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 95, wherein at least two of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`first, the second and the at least one additional thinned substrates are formed using a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`different process technology, wherein the different process technology is selected from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the group consisting ofDRAM, SRAM, FLASH, EPROM, EEPROM, Ferroelectric and
`
`
`
`
`Giant Magneto Resistance.
`
`97.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 95, wherein at least one ofthe
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`first, the second and the at least one additional thinned substrates comprises a
`
`
`
`
`microprocessor.
`
`98.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 95, wherein:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least one substrate of the first, the second and the at least one additional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thinned substrates has memory circuitry formed thereon; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least one substrate of the first, the second and the at least one additional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thinned substrates has logic circuitry formed thereon that performs tests on the at least
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`one substrate that has memory circuitry formed thereon.
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 3 of 15
`
`

`
`
`99.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus of claim 95, wherein at least one
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate of the first, the second and the at least one additional thinned substrates has
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`memory circuitry formed thereon, the memory circuitry having a plurality ofmemory
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`locations, wherein at least one memory location ofthe plurality of memory locations is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`used for sparing and wherein data from the at least one memory location on the at least
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`one substrate having memory circuitry formed thereon is used instead of data from a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`defective memory location on the at least one substrate that has memory circuitry formed
`
`thereon.
`
`
`
`
`I00.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 95, wherein:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least one substrate of the first, the second and the at least one additional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thinned substrates has memory circuitry formed thereon; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least one substrate of the first, the second and the at least one additional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thinned substrates has logic circuitry formed thereon that performs programmable gate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`line address assignment with respect to the at least one substrate having memory circuitry
`formed thereon.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`101.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 95, further comprising a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plurality of interior vertical interconnections that traverse at least one of the first, the
`second and the at least one additional thinned substrates.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I02.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus of claim 95, wherein infonnation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`processing is performed on data routed between the circuitry of at least two of the first,
`the second and the at least one additional thinned substrates.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`103.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 95, wherein at least one ofthe
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`first, the second and the at least one additional thinned substrates has reconfiguration
`
`
`
`
`circuitry.
`
`
`
`104.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 95, wherein at least one ofthe
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`first, the second, and the at least one additional thinned substrates has logic circuitry
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`formed thereon for performing at least one function from the group consisting of: virtual
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`memory management, ECC, indirect addressing, content addressing, data compression,
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 4 of 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`data decompression, graphics acceleration, audio encoding, audio decoding, video
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`encoding, video decoding, voice recognition, handwriting recognition, power
`
`
`
`
`management and database processing.
`
`
`
`105.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus ofclaim 95, further comprising:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a memory array having a plurality ofmemory storage cells, a plurality of
`data lines, and a plurality ofgate lines, each memory storage cell stores a data value and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`has circuitry for coupling the data value to one ofthe plurality of data lines in response to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`receiving a gate control signal from one ofthe plurality ofgate lines;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`circuitry that generates the gate control signal in response to receiving an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`address, including means for mapping addresses to gate lines; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a controller that determines if one of the plurality of memory cells is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`defective and alters said mapping to remove references to the one of the plurality of
`
`
`
`
`
`memory cells that is defective.
`
`
`
`106.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure of claim 95, further
`
`comprising:
`
`
`
`
`substrate;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least one controller substrate having logic circuitry formed thereon;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least one memory substrate having memory circuitry formed thereon;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a plurality ofdata lines and a plurality ofgate lines on each memory
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an array of memory cells on each memory substrate, each memory cell
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stores a data value and has circuitry that couples the data value to one of the plurality of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`data lines in response to selecting one ofthe plurality ofgate lines;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a gate line selection circuit that enables a gate line for a memory
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`operation, wherein the gate line selection circuit has programmable gates to receive
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`address assignments for at least one gate line ofthe plurality ofgate lines and wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`address assignments for determining which ofthe plurality ofgate lines is selected for
`
`
`
`
`
`each programmed address assignment; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`controller substrate logic that determines if one memory cell of the array
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of memory cells is defective and alters the address assignments of the plurality of gate
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 5 of 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lines to remove references to the gate line that causes the defective memory cell to Couple
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a data value to one ofthe plurality ofdata lines.
`
`
`
`
`
`controller substrate logic:
`
`107.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure of claim 106, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tests the array of memory cells periodically to determine if one of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`array ofmemory cells is defective; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`removes references in the address assignments to gate lines that cause
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`detected defective memory cells to couple data values to the plurality of data lines.
`
`108.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure of claim 106, further
`
`
`comprising:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`programmable logic to prevent the use of data values from the plurality of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`data lines when gate lines cause detected defective memory cells to couple data values to
`
`
`
`
`
`the plurality ofdata lines.
`
`
`
`109.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure ofclaim 106, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`array of memory cells are arranged within physical space in a physical order and are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`arranged within an address space in a logical order and wherein the physical order of at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`least one memory cell is different than the logical order ofthe at least one memory cell.
`
`
`
`1 10.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure of claim 106, wherein:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the logic circuitry of the at least one controller substrate is tested by an
`
`
`
`
`external means; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the array of memory cells of the at least one memory substrate are tested
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by the logic circuitry of the at least one controller substrate, wherein the testing achieves ’
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a functional testing ofa substantial portion ofthe array of memory cells.
`
`
`
`I
`
`I 1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure ofclaim lO6, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`logic circuitry ofthe at least one controller substrate performs functional testing ofa
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substantial portion ofthe array ofmemory cells.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure ofclaim 106, wherein the
`I I2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`controller substrate logic is further configured to:
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 6 of 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prevent the use of at least one defective gate line; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`replace references to memory cells addressed using the defective gate line
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with references to spare memory cells addressed using a spare gate line.
`
`I 13.
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure of claim 106, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`controller substrate logic is further configured to prevent the use of at least one defective
`
`
`
`gate line.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Currently amended) The structure ofclaim I06, wherein the logic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`circuitry of the at least one controller substrate [:)1‘:‘~i‘~li1~)l~‘l‘HSC‘c\l) perform all functional testing
`
`I 14.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the array of memory cells of the at least one memory substrate.
`
`
`is a non-semiconductor material.
`
`
`
`
`115.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Withdrawn) The apparatus of claim 88, wherein the first substrate
`
`I 16.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Currently Amended) An integrated circuit structure comprising:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a first substrate having topside and bottomside surfaces, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`topside surface of the first substrate has interconnect contacts ;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a thinned second substrate having topside and bottomside surfaces,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wherein the to aside surface and the bottomside surface of thesecond substrate
`interconnect contacts . and wherein the bottomside sixrface ofthe second
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.substrate is mlishccl;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wherein at mafor onion old‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘ the topside surface of the first substrate
`
`
`and one ofthc Io .')Sltlt3 siirl}-iicc ofihc second siihslmtc and the botmmsitlc surliicc ol‘t|*n:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second substrate are honclccl tog_cll1ci'; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conductive paths l%>r—meel~between the interconnect contacts on the topside
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ofthe first substrate and ;2_z_1_i_c_l__onc oI’i,hc imsicle si,ii-lace ol'ihc sccoiicl substrate 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and the bottomside surface of the second substrate, the conductive paths providing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`electrical connections between the first substrate and the second substrate;«~whei=ein—+he
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lii'st~sabst~.Hi«1e-»is rat~leasH~»4ee—as4~hic~l+a+Hl1e~seeonei~sHlastratea;_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wherein the
`
`
`
`3
`
`“‘ "
`
`
`
`
`
`'
`
`
`
`.5
`
`'
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`substrate overlapping
`
`
`
`0\’€l‘l€lpS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least a majority ofthe 1
`
`’
`
`
`
`.“
`
`'
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`
`
`..
`
`c
`
`
`
`T
`
`" second substrate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 7 of 15
`
`

`
`1 l7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Currently Amended) The integrated circuit structure ofclaim l 16,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wherein selected ones of said interconnect contacts said topside surface of said first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate are in electrical contact with selected ones of the interconnect contacts F.-)l}»-tfli
`said bottomside surface of said second substrate so as to form said electrical connections.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I l8.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Currently Amended) An integrated circuit structure comprising:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a first substrate having a first and second surface;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a second substrate having a first and second surface, wherein said second
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`surfaces of the first and second substrates are opposite to said first surfaces;
`\\«'hcrcin at least one of the first substrate and the SCC()l1d substrate is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.lti..nn..c_c_l__t_«;~. Wm 211. least 9.00 IhiI_m_s:d strlvstttiattst, '~‘1!1£l.‘_El_l€Ft2,l_t1-ll3.s:_$§9$n1§l..fiflllffiflflifi
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`least one thinned stibstrate
`nolishedz
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`t
`
`
`
`‘
`
`*
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9-wherein the first surface ofthe first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate and a maior portion ofonc oi” the first surface of the second substrate and the
`
`
`
`second surl'2icc oflhe second substrate are bonded lw at least one bond.‘ wherein the at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`least one bond secures a ma’or aortion of the second substrate to the first substrate; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conductive paths ¥em+ed~enl)etween at least two of‘ the first surfaces of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`first substrate and the first and second sttrfag_e_g_9t“ the second substrates,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`, wliercin the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`seeandsubstrate ovei‘|ap. 5 at least a majority ofthe
`second substrate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`119.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure of claim 116, further
`
`
`comprising:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least one additional thinned substrate having circuitry formed thereon;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a first of said at least one additional thinned substrate being bonded to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second substrate and any additional thinned substrates being bonded to the directly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`adjacent additional thinned substrate; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conductive paths formed between said first of said at least one additional
`thinned substrate and at least one of said first and second substrates and also between
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 8 of 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`each additional thinned substrate and at least one of said substrates of the integrated
`circuit structure.
`
`
`
`
`
`I20.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure ofclaim I 19, further
`
`
`comprising:
`
`
`substrate;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least one controller substrate having logic circuitry formed thereon;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at least one memory substrate having memory circuitry formed thereon;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a plurality ofdata lines and a plurality ofgate lines on each memory
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an array of memory cells on each memory substrate, each memory cell
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stores a data value and has circuitry that couples the data value to one of the plurality of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`data lines in response to selecting one of the plurality of gate lines;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a gate line selection circuit that enables a gate line for a memory
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`operation, wherein the gate line selection circuit has programmable gates to receive
`address assignments for at least one gate line of the plurality of gate lines and wherein the.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`address assignments for determining which ofthe plurality of gate lines is Selected for
`
`
`
`
`
`each programmed address assignment; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`controller substrate logic that determines ifone memory cell ofthe array
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of memory cells is defective and alters the address assignments of the plurality of gate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lines to remove references to the gate line that causes the defective memory cell to couple
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a data value to one ofthe plurality of data lines.
`
`
`121.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure ofclaim 120, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`controller substrate logic:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tests the array ofmemory cells periodically to determine ifone of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`array of memory cells is defective; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`removes references in the address assignments to gate lines that cause
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`detected defective memory cells to couple data values to the plurality ofdata lines.
`
`
`I22.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure ofclaim 120, further
`
`
`comprising:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`programmable logic to prevent the use of data values from the plurality of
`
`
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 9 of 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`data lines when gate lines cause detected defective memory cells to couple data values to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the plurality ofdata lines.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure of claim 120, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`array of memory cells are arranged within physical space in a physical order and are
`
`l23.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`arranged within an address space in a logical order and wherein the physical order of at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`least one memory cell is different than the logical order ofthe at least one memory cell.
`
`124.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure ofclaim I20, wherein:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the logic circuitry of the at least one controller substrate is tested by an
`
`
`
`
`external means; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the array of memory cells of the at least one memory substrate are tested
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by the logic circuitry of the at least one controller substrate, wherein the testing achieves
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a functional testing of a substantial portion of the array of memory cells.
`
`
`
`125.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure ofclaim 120, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`logic circuitry of the at least one controller substrate performs functional testing of a
`substantial portion of the array of memory cells.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure ofclaim 120, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`controller substrate logic is further configured to:
`
`126.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prevent the use of at least one defective gate line; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`replace references to memory cells addressed using the defective gate line
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with references to spare memory cells addressed using a spare gate line.
`
`127.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Previously Presented) The structure ofclaim 120, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`controller substrate logic is further configured to prevent the use of at least one defective
`
`
`
`gate line.
`
`128.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Currently amended) The structure ofclaim 120, wherein the logic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`circuitry of the at least one controller substrate peniartmscan perlorm all functional testing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ofthe array of memory cells ofthe at least one memory substrate.
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 10 of 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(New) The structure of claim 88, wherein the second substrate is
`thinned to about 50 microns or less.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`129.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(New) The structure of claim 116, wherein the second substrate is
`thinned to about 50 microns or less.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`130.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(New) The structure of claim 118, wherein the second substrate is
`thinned to about 50 microns or less.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`131.
`
`
`l32.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(New) The structure of claim 88, wherein the first substrate and the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second substrate are the same size or overlap each other completely.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(New) The structure of claim l 16, wherein the first substrate and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the second substrate are the same size or overlap each other completely.
`
`
`I33.
`
`l34.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(New) The structure of claim 1 18, wherein the first substrate and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the second substrate are the same size or overlap each other completely.
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 11 of 15
`
`

`
`REMARKS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Office Action of 04/24/2009 has been carefully considered.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 110 and 124 were indicated as containing allowable subject matter, which
`
`
`
`
`
`
`indication is apprcciatively acknowledged.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 88, 95 and 116-119 were rej ected as being unpatentable over Sugiyama in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`View of Watanabe (newly cited) and filI'1lhCI' in View of Leedy. (Although page 3 of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`rejection refers only to Sugiyama and Watanabe, page 4 of the rejection refers also to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Leedy. The omission from Leedy in the initial statement of the rejection is therefore
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`believed to be in error.) Claims 106-108, 111-114, 120-122 and 125-128 were rejected as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`being unpatentable over the same base combination further in View of Faris and Sakui.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 109 and 123 were rejected as being unpatentable over the prior combination
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`further in View of Daberko. The claims have been amended to more clearly distinguish
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`over the cited references. Dependent claims 129-134 have been newly added.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reconsideration is respectfully requested.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`More particularly, independent claims 88, 116, and 118 have been amended to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`recite in part a thinned substrate having a polished surface. Surface polishing achieves
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stress relief and provides a smooth surface for the formation of interconnect
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`metallization. None of the cited references is believed to teach or suggest such surface
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`polishing with respect to a thinned substrate. All of the claims are therefore believed to be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`allowable over the prior art for at least this reason.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`With respect to the prior obviousness rejection, although this rejection is believed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to be no longer applicable, it is also believed to be significantly flawed, as set forth
`below.
`
`
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 12 of 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Rejection 0[ Claims 88, 95 and 116-119 as Ungatentable Over Sugiyama in View of
`
`
`
`
`
`Watanabe Further in View of Leedy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the prior Office Action, the claims were rejected as being unpatentable over
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sugiyama in view of Leedy. The purported motivation for combining the teachings of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sugiyama and Leedy was “to provide structural integrity.” In the prior Response,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant disputed this motivation as lacking technical merit. This argument was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`apparently found to be persuasive, resulting in the present Office Action in which the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`claims are rejected as being unpatentable over Sugiyama in View of Watanabe further in
`
`
`
`
`
`view of Leedy.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`However, the same supposed motivation for combining the teachings of Leedy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with those of Sugiyama and Watanabe is cited—“to provide structural integrity.” This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`motivation is believed to be technically unsound for the reasons set forth in the prior
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reply. That is, the substrates of Sugiyama are, to all indications, of ordinary thickness
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(e.g., 300-500 microns).Thc structural integrity of substrates of such ordinary thickness
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`without the need of any further measures is well-established and demonstrated. Hence,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`contrary to the rejection, Sugiyama has no need of the techniques of Leedy for ensuring
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`structural integrity of a thinned substrate or IC membrane.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Furthermore, the problem of proper motivation to combine has only been
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compounded with the proposed additional combination of Watanabe. Watanabe teaches a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`technique for making an IC assembly having two ICs made of dissimilar semiconductor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`materials, namely silicon and gallium arsenide. The silicon wafer is thinned and adhered
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to a sapphire wafer. Following dicing, a relatively small gallium arsenide IC is bonded to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the silicon IC. The sapphire substrate provides thermal matching.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Watanabe technique is wholly inapplicable to Sugiyama. Sugiyama teaches
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the face—to—face bonding of two IC wafers. There is no opportunity for the bonding of a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`further IC subsequent to dicing—the surfaces that might otherwise be bonded to are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`internal to the Sugiyama structure. Without such subsequent bonding, there would be no
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`need for the thermal matching substrate, i.e., the sapphire substrate.
`
`
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 13 of 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As no reasonable motivation has been identified for combining the teachings of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the references in the manner indicated, the cited references are not believed to teach or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`suggest the invention of claim 88, particularly as it has now been amended to recite in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`part a thinned substrate having a polished surface.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The same argument applies equally to claims 1 l6 and H9. Hence, it may be seen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that the cited references do not teach or suggest the invention of claims 88, 1 l6 or l 19.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Withdrawal of the rejection is respectfully requested.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The various combinations of references used to reject the dependent claims do
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nothing to address the teachings absent from the base combination as noted above.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Therefore, the dependent claims are believed to be allowable as depending on an
`
`
`
`allowable base claim.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant further rcitcratcs that motivation to combine is not supplied merely by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`two references being from the same field of endeavor (e.g., two integrated circuits). Ifa
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`proposed combination would make no reasonable sense to a person of ordinary skill in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the art, motivation to combine is necessarily lacking.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As there has been ample opportunity during prosecution of the present application
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for a case of obviousness to be established (if the prior art will indeed support such a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`finding), and since no primafacie case of obviousness is believed to have been
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`established, allowance of the present application is believed to be in order and is
`
`
`
`
`respectfully requested.
`
`
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 14 of 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Withdrawal of the rejections and allowance of claims 88, 95, 106-109, 111-114,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`116-123 and 125-134 is respectfidlly requested.
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/Michael J. Ure/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Michael J. Ure, Reg. 33,089
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: 6."25."2009
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1029
`Page 15 of 15

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket