throbber
Stress in thermal Si02 during growth
`E. P. EerNisse
`Sandia Laboratories. Albuquerque. New Mexico 87185
`
`(Received 15 March 1979; accepted for publication 25 April 1979)
`
`Stress present in thermal Si02 at temperatures during growth in wet O2 has been measured as a
`function of growth temperature. During growth at 950·C and below, compressive stress on the
`order of7X 109 dyn/cm2 is generated in the Si02. During growth at 975 and l000·C, the Si02
`grows in a stress-free state. The results, which are consistent with a viscous flow point somewhere
`between 950 and 975 ·C, are of value in avoiding mechanical failure effects in integrated-circuit
`processing.
`PACS numbers: 73.40.Qv, 85.30.Tv, 46.30.Jv, 68.25. + j
`
`The mechanical properties of materials used in Si device
`processing, such as Si, thermal Si02, and deposited Si02
`and Si3N4, are rapidly becoming limiting factors in advanced
`integrated-circuit technology. Numerous workers have
`identified high-temperature dislocation generation in Si be(cid:173)
`neath the edges and/or corners of windows in Si02 and
`Si3 N4 films which seems related to mechanical stress fields.
`These dislocations lead to yield problems as device packing
`density increases. 1 Mechanical stress-induced cracking in
`Si3N~Si02 masking layers at discontinuities degrades
`yield. 2 The dependence of ionizing radiation effects in MOS
`devices on device processing variables can be explained by
`trap creation with viscous flow in thermal Si02 around
`965 .c. 3,4 Viscous flow of thermal Si02 , both steam- and
`dry-02 grown, has been observed around 965 .c. 4 Recent
`theoretical modeling of the growth process for thermal Si02
`suggests that the lack of free volume during growth to ac(cid:173)
`commodate the density differences between Si02 and Si
`should lead to significant stresses during growth and that
`viscous flow effects may play an important role in the growth
`process. 5
`Past works on stress in thermal Si02 involve measuring
`the stresses at room temperature after growth which arise
`from differences in thermal expansion between Si and Si02 .
`The present work demonstrates that large compressive
`stresses on the order of7X 10 9 dyn/cm 2 exist in wet-02-
`grown thermal Si02 during growth at temperatures from
`950 ·C downwards, but that this thermal Si02 grows in a
`stress-free condition from 975 to 1000 ·C, with possible
`small tensile stresses occurring above 1000 ·C. The stress
`present during growth are large enough to cause plastic de(cid:173)
`formation of Si at growth temperatures.
`Experiments were carried out on I-n cm P-doped (111)
`and (100) Si wafers. Cleaned wafers were steam oxidized to a
`4000-A thickness, back lapped to an approximately
`1.5 X 10 - 2_cm thickness, Si etched to remove polishing
`strains on the back surface, and coated on the back with
`approximately 750 A ofCVD Si3N4. Samples 0.5 X2.5 cm
`were scribed and the front surface oxide was removed, leav(cid:173)
`ing samples with bare Si on the front and Si3N4 on the back.
`Some of the samples were further treated to remove the
`Si3N4, grow 4000 A ofSi02 in wet 02 at l000·C on both
`surfaces, and then remove the front Si02 layer, thus leaving
`samples with bare Si on the front and thick Si02 on the back.
`
`In both sample geometries, the intent was to inhibit Si02
`growth on the back side so that stresses occurring during
`new Si02 growth on the front surface will cause bending of
`the Si sample.
`Bending during Si02 growth was monitored as in an
`earlier work 3 by cantilevering the sample inside a furnace
`and reflecting two parallel laser beams off the sample, one
`beam impinging near the clamped end, one impinging near
`the free end. The reflected light beams were directed around
`the room for 786 cm and then the spot separation was mea(cid:173)
`sured. Changes in spot separation ..18 are related to curva(cid:173)
`ture changes LlK by
`LlK = ..18 /2rS,
`(1)
`where S = 786 and r = 1.6 cm is the spot separation at the
`sample (LlK > 0 means convex on the front surface).
`Results for two (111) samples with Si02 back masks
`and for one (111) with a Si3N4 back mask are shown in Fig. 1
`as LlK versus time in a furnace with flowing O2 bubbled
`through water held just below boiling. In the case of the two
`Si02 back-mask samples, the large initial curvature at room
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0 000
`WOO C
`
`0
`
`0
`
`~
`
`e
`
`..
`•
`
`10000 C
`
`.. .. .... ....
`..
`..
`.. ..
`•
`• • •
`•• • • •
`
`900° C
`
`•
`
`• •
`• •
`• •
`..
`..
`..
`
`.. ..
`
`1111151
`
`0
`
`Sj3~4 BACK SIDE C.1ASK
`
`..... SiO? BACK" DE 1,1AI<
`
`-[
`
`·2
`
`>-
`
`~
`
`00
`
`~
`'" oc
`oc :::
`~
`:=
`z
`~
`~
`~ ·4
`
`10
`
`,0
`
`100
`
`){)[J
`
`TI1\1f IN FURNACE (minute~1
`
`FIG. 1. Observed sample curvature as a function of time during growth of
`thermal SiOz for two (\ II) samples with an SiOz back-side mask (two
`temperatures: 900 and 1000 "C) and for one (III) sample with an Si,N 4 back
`side mask (900 "C).
`
`8
`
`AppL Phys. Lett. 35(1). 1 July 1979
`
`0003-6951/79/010008-03$00.50
`
`© 1979 American Institute of Physics
`
`8
`
` This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 72.37.248.4
`On: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:40:19
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1045
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`
`16 r - - . - - - , - - - , - - - r - - , - - - , - - - , - - - r - - , - - - ,
`
`GROWTH
`TEMPERATURE
`10300 C
`1000
`975
`950
`900
`850
`1000
`950
`900
`
`11
`
`BACK SIDE MASK
`
`~01 ~4l
`
`o
`'V
`
`'
`I III I Si
`
`•
`
`0 o
`: i 1100) Si
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`w " u z
`0 '"
`
`-4
`
`..
`
`t><I
`t>
`
`t>t>
`<I
`<I
`
`t>
`
`t>
`
`<l
`
`<l
`
`400
`
`1100
`800
`THI CKNESS Of THERMAL Si01
`
`(~)
`
`1600
`
`1000
`
`FIG. 2. Sample curvature induced by stresses in thermal Si02 grown in wet
`O2 on (III) and (100) samples versus Si02 thickness. The line represents
`the curvature introduction expected for an Si02 stress level of 7 X 10 9
`dyn/cm 2,
`
`temperature (time = 0) is caused by the differences in ther(cid:173)
`mal expansion between Si and Si02 • The Si3N4 back-mask
`sample in Fig. 1 has less curvature at room temperature and
`is curved in the opposite direction to that of the Si02 back(cid:173)
`mask samples because the Si3N4 on the back is thin and in
`tension while the Si02 on the back ofthe other two samples
`is thick and in compression. As seen in Fig. 1, after entry into
`the furnace, the samples straighten up as they equilibrate
`with the furnace (which takes approximately 5-8 min). If
`there is stress in the growing oxide, the samples continue to
`bend as seen in the 900 ·C data, which shows continual bend(cid:173)
`ing for times greater than 10 min. Note that the 1000 ·C data
`shows no bending during Si02 growth (times greater than 10
`min, which leads to the conclusion that the Si02 is growing
`stress free at this temperature.
`Data such as that in Fig. 1 were obtained at several
`temperatures around the viscous flow point of 965 .c. Re(cid:173)
`sults were analyzed as follows to obtain a best estimate for
`L1Ko, the value of curvature at growth temperature for zero
`Si02 thickness, 1"SiO,' A plot of raw data such as in Fig. 1
`versus 1" SiO, exhibits an easily identified slope in the data for
`times after about 8 min. The intercept of this straight portion
`at zero 1"SiO, is taken as L1Ko for that sample. The value of
`L1Ko was generally different from zero (flat) because of a
`constant stress in the back mask. The value for L1Ko was
`subtracted from the data taken after 8 min and the resulting
`data replotted versus Si02 thickness 1" SiO,' Thickness 7' SiO, as
`a function of time was estimated by measuring the final oxide
`thickness and using published 7'sio,-vs-time plots for steam
`growth of Si02 shifted to match the final thickness-time
`
`2
`
`data point (a typical run at lOoo·C grew 3200 A in 3 h).
`Results are shown in Fig. 2 for various growth temperatures.
`Note first of all in Fig. 2 that there is a dramatic differ(cid:173)
`ence in going from 950 to 975 or lOoo·C for both the (111)
`and (100) samples. Also note that the results for either back(cid:173)
`mask choice are essentially the same for a given growth tem(cid:173)
`perature, thus assuring that the major effects are due to
`stress (or lack of stress) in the growing Si02 •
`The results for the Si3N4 back-mask samples tended to
`level off as 1"SiO exceeded 600 A. This is not understood at
`present, but the quality of our Si3N4 films and their contin-
`ued masking ability is suspect because their etch rates in
`room-temperature HF are far too high (500 A/min) even
`though the index of refraction (1.97) is consistent with low(cid:173)
`oxygen-content material. The Si02 back-mask results at
`growth temperatures of950 ·C and below show that the sam(cid:173)
`ples continue to curve as long as Si02 continues to grow .
`A line is included in Fig. 2 to indicate the level of stress(cid:173)
`es seen in the Si02 during growth. The curvature change L1K
`is proportional to the integral of the stress through the oxide
`thickness. If we assume that the oxide stress is constant
`through 7' SiO,' L1K is proportional to 1" SiO, and is related to the
`stress in the Si02 , SSiO" by
`
`(2)
`
`where 7'Si is the sample thickness and ESi and VSi are
`Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio, respectively. Letting 4
`ESi(1 - VSi) - 1 = 2.28 X 1012 dny/cm 2, the line in Fig. 2 is
`plotted for SSiO, = 7 X 109 dyn/cm 2. This value of stress is
`large compared to the room-temperature stresses of 3 X 10 9
`dyn/ cm 2 set up during cooldown 7 by the differences in ther(cid:173)
`mal expansion for Si and Si02 • Prediction of the existence of
`stress during growth by examination of the room-tempera(cid:173)
`ture stresses in our samples after coo/down has been incon(cid:173)
`clusive because there is apparently some occasional relief or
`compaction of the stressed films during cooldown. More
`work is needed here.
`Near discontinuities in the growing oxide, shear stress(cid:173)
`es will exist in the Si02 and Si near the SilSi02 interface.
`These shear stresses are of the order of the compressive stress
`in the oxide and are proportional to the integral over 7'SiO of
`the oxide stress. Since the recently measured 6 critical st:ess
`for shear flow in Si at lOoo·C is 3.4 X 107 dyn/cm 2, it is
`entirely plausible to see plastic deformation of Si beneath
`discontinuities in growing Si02 layers (near the edges of
`windows, etc.). In other words, the present results show that
`high stresses can exist in our Si02 at growth temperature
`where the Si is mechanically weak.
`The possibility of a tensile stress in the Si02 growing at
`1030 ·C is seen in Fig. 2. This result is tentative because the
`effect is small and has not been checked yet at higher
`temperature.
`Several runs using dry O 2 were attempted. The much
`reduced growth rate of thermal Si02 in dry O2 made the
`experiments more difficult. Preliminary results suggest that
`the stress levels are much reduced over those seen in Figs. 1
`
`9
`
`Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 35, No.1, 1 July 1979
`
`E.P. EerNisse
`
`9
`
` This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 72.37.248.4
`On: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:40:19
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1045
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`
`and 2, but further data must be taken before conclusions and
`interpretations can be made.
`In conclusion, the present results demonstrate that
`large compressive stresses exist in wet-02 -grown thermal
`Si02 during growth at 950·C and below. No stress is ob(cid:173)
`served at 975 and 1000·C with possible small tensile stresses
`seen above 1000 ·C. The results are consistent with viscous
`flow occurring between 950 and 975 ·C during Si02
`growth. A viscous set point around 925 ·C has been inferred
`from measurements of stress in thermal Si02 at the growth
`temperature 7 and was observed directly 4 as occurring
`around 965 ·C. The present results, which treat the stresses
`during growth at the growth temperature, should be of value
`in avoiding mechanical damage effects in VLSI or VHSI
`technologies by careful choice ofSi02 growth temperatures.
`Also, a minimum in stress level at 975-1000·C seems to
`correlate with the optimum conditions for radiation-hard
`dry-02 MOS technology, 8 which is probably not just a coin(cid:173)
`cidence because the viscous flow of both dry-02 - and steam(cid:173)
`grown thermal Si02 occurs around 965 ·C. 4
`
`R.E. Anderson contributed to this work with sample(cid:173)
`geometry suggestions, and J.B. Snelling and T.A. Plut con(cid:173)
`tributed to the experimental setup design and data taking.
`This work was supported by the United States Department
`of Energy (DOE) under contract No. DE-AC04-76-
`DPOO789.
`
`lAo Bohg and A.K. Gaind, Appl. Phys. Lett. 33, 895 (1978).
`'H. Miyoshi, N. Tsubouchi, and A. Nishimoto, J. Electrochem. Soc. 125,
`1824 (1978).
`'E.P. EerNisse and G.F. Derbenwick, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-23, 1534
`(1976).
`'E.P. EerNisse, Appl. Phys. Lett. 30, 290 (1977).
`'W.A. Tiller, J. Electrochem. Soc. (to be published).
`'S.M. Hu, J. Appl. Phys. 49,5678 (1978).
`'J.R. Patel and N. Kato, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 971 (1973).
`'G.F. Derbenwick and B.L. Gregory, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-22, 2151
`(1975).
`
`10
`
`Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 35, No.1, 1 July 1979
`
`E.P. EerNisse
`
`10
`
` This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 72.37.248.4
`On: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:40:19
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1045
`Page 3 of 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket