throbber
Doc Code: TRACK1.REQ
`Document Description: TrackOne Request
`
`PTO/SB/424 (12-11)
`
`CERTIFICATION AND REQUEST FOR PRIORITIZED EXAMINATION
`UNDER 37 CFR 1.102(e) (Page 1 of 1)
`
`First Named
`Inventor:
`Title of
`Invention:
`
`LEEDY
`
`known):
`Three dimensional memory structure
`
`I Nonprovisional Application Number (if I
`
`APPLICANT HEREBY CERTIFIES THE FOLLOWING AND REQUESTS PRIORITIZED EXAMINATION FOR
`THE ABOVE-IDENTIFIED APPLICATION.
`
`1. The processing fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(i), the prioritized examination fee set forth in 37
`CFR 1.17(c), and if not already paid, the publication fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.18(d) have been
`filed with the request. The basic filing fee, search fee, examination fee, and any required
`excess claims and application size fees are filed with the request or have been already been
`paid.
`
`2. The application contains or is amended to contain no more than four independent claims and
`no more than thirty total claims, and no multiple dependent claims.
`
`3. The applicable box is checked below:
`
`I.
`
`r::-~1 Original Application (Track One) -Prioritized Examination under§ 1.1 02(e)(1)
`
`i.
`
`(a) The application is an original nonprovisional utility application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111 (a).
`This certification and request is being filed with the utility application via EFS-Web.
`---OR---
`( b) The application is an original nonprovisional plant application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111 (a).
`This certification and request is being filed with the plant application in paper.
`
`ii. An executed oath or declaration under 37 CFR 1.63 is filed with the application.
`
`II.
`
`[] Request for Continued Examination - Prioritized Examination under§ 1.1 02(e)(2)
`
`i. A request for continued examination has been filed with, or prior to, this form.
`ii.
`If the application is a utility application, this certification and request is being filed via EFS-Web.
`iii. The application is an original nonprovisional utility application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111 (a), or is
`a national stage entry under 35 U.S.C. 371.
`iv. This certification and request is being filed prior to the mailing of a first Office action responsive
`to the request for continued examination.
`v. No prior request for continued examination has been granted prioritized examination status
`under 37 CFR 1.1 02( e )(2).
`
`Siqnature /MichaeiJ Ure/
`~p~~~Typed) Michael J. Ure
`
`Date 2013-08-08
`33089
`
`Practitioner
`Registration Number
`
`Note: Signatures of all the inventors or assignees of record of the entire interest or their representative(s) are required in accordance with
`37CFR 1.33 and 11.18. Please see 37 CFR 1.4(d) for the form of the signature. If necessary, submit multiple forms for more than one
`siqnature, see below*.
`
`D *Total of
`
`forms are submitted.
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 1 of 613
`
`

`

`Privacy Act Statement
`
`The Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579) requires that you be given certain information in connection with your
`submission of the attached form related to a patent application or patent. Accordingly, pursuant to the requirements of
`the Act, please be advised that: (1) the general authority for the collection of this information is 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2); (2)
`furnishing of the information solicited is voluntary; and (3) the principal purpose for which the information is used by the
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is to process and/or examine your submission related to a patent application or
`patent. If you do not furnish the requested information, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may not be able to
`process and/or examine your submission, which may result in termination of proceedings or abandonment of the
`application or expiration of the patent.
`
`The information provided by you in this form will be subject to the following routine uses:
`
`1. The information on this form will be treated confidentially to the extent allowed under the Freedom of
`Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C 552a). Records from this system of records may
`be disclosed to the Department of Justice to determine whether disclosure of these records is required by the
`Freedom of Information Act.
`2. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in the course of presenting evidence
`to a court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, including disclosures to opposing counsel in the course of
`settlement negotiations.
`3. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Member of Congress submitting a
`request involving an individual, to whom the record pertains, when the individual has requested assistance from
`the Member with respect to the subject matter of the record.
`4. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a contractor of the Agency having
`need for the information in order to perform a contract. Recipients of information shall be required to comply
`with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(m).
`5. A record related to an International Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in this system of
`records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property
`Organization, pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
`6. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to another federal agency for purposes
`of National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C.
`218(c)).
`7. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the Administrator, General
`Services, or his/her designee, during an inspection of records conducted by GSA as part of that agency's
`responsibility to recommend improvements in records management practices and programs, under authority of
`44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. Such disclosure shall be made in accordance with the GSA regulations governing
`inspection of records for this purpose, and any other relevant (i.e., GSA or Commerce) directive. Such
`disclosure shall not be used to make determinations about individuals.
`8. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the public after either publication of
`the application pursuant to 35 U .S.C. 122(b) or issuance of a patent pursuant to 35 U .S.C. 151. Further, a
`record may be disclosed, subject to the limitations of 37 CFR 1.14, as a routine use, to the public if the record
`was filed in an application which became abandoned or in which the proceedings were terminated and which
`application is referenced by either a published application, an application open to public inspection or an issued
`patent.
`9. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal, State, or local law
`enforcement agency, if the USPTO becomes aware of a violation or potential violation of law or regulation.
`
`Page 2
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 2 of 613
`
`

`

`l.
`
`A stacked circuit structure comprising:
`
`a plurality ofstacked, thin, substantially· flexible circuit !ayers or
`
`wiring layers each comprising a top sud~H.:e and a bottom surhKt~ and at
`
`least one ohvhich comprises a thinned, substantially flexible semiconduc-
`
`tor substratt~ of one pieu~; and
`
`an inter!ayer n.~gion disposed bt~twt~en a pair of vertically adjacent
`
`circuit layers or v-.riring layers and extending from a top surfa1.:e of one of
`
`the pair of vertically adjacent circuit layers or \viring !ay·ers to a bottom
`
`surt~Ke of anoth.~r one oftht.~ pair ot\ierlic~tl!y adjacent circuit Iayt~rs or
`
`\viring Iayt~rs, the interlayer region comprising an interlayer lbr pn.nriding
`
`mechanical attachment and ek~ctricalinterconnect1on bet\veen the pair of
`
`vertically <H.ij<K:ent circuit layers or \Viring layers;
`
`wherdn within the intedayer region the stacked 1..:ircuit structun~
`
`consists essentia Hy of metal or meta! and silicon-based dielectric.
`
`2.
`
`The apparatus of Claim I, wherein the interlayer cmnprises hotl1
`
`signa!-canying metal contacts and lH.m-signal-can)ling meta! bonding areas.
`
`3.
`
`The apparatus of Claim I, \Vherein the thinned, substantially f1exi-
`
`b!e semiconductor substrate comprises a plurality of etched through-holes each
`
`surrounding a vertical interconnect, each vertical interconnect comprising a con-
`
`dutctm and an insulator surrounding tl1e conductor and isolating the conductor
`
`tl-om the thinned, substantially flexible semiconductor substrate.
`
`4.
`
`The apparatus ofClai1n 3, wht.~rein the insulator comprises low-
`
`stress dielertric material having a stress of 5 x lOx dynes/cn12 tensile or less.
`
`5.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 1 , comprising a lO\\' -stress dielectric. I a y·er
`
`formed above the thinned, substantially tlexible semiconductor substrate,. \vherein
`
`the low-stress dielectric layer exhibits net tensile stress.
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 3 of 613
`
`

`

`6.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 5, >vherein the !m-v-stress dide<.:tric layer
`
`has a StH.$S of 5 X I 08 dynes/cm2 tensile or less.
`
`7.
`
`~T'he appa.ratus t)f(~Iairn l, \\<here.h.l a l.lacks.tde i..1f d1e th.itlnt~d~ sttb-
`
`stantiaUy Hex1hle semkonductor substrate is polished. to reduce vulnerability to
`
`fracture as a result of Hexing and is devoid of integrated circuitry.
`
`Fl. <.:.
`
`The apparatl.ls of Claim 1, comprising a plurality of stacked, thin,
`
`substantiaHv f1exihle circuit la,,..ers. one of the stacked, thin, substantially tlexible
`.
`.
`
`.
`
`~
`
`'~ircuit layers comprising a memory array and another ofthe stacked, thin, substan-
`
`tially flexibk~ circuit la~lers comprising a mt~nKH)' controller for controlling the
`
`memory arra)r.
`
`9..
`
`Tht.~ apparatus of Claim 8, \·vherdn the one of the stacked, thin, sub-
`
`stantiaHy flexible circu.it layers <..:omprises a. phlmllt)l of independently-operable
`
`tnemory arrays, tht.~ n1emory controller being <.:onfigured to control the plurahty of
`
`in,kpendently-operable memory arrays independently· and in paralkl;
`
`further con1prising a plurality of indeptmtly-operable verti<.:al inter-
`
`conm .. ~(.:t buses, \)/herein data exchanged bt.~twt~en the memory controller
`
`~md the plurality of independently-operable nx~mory arrays is bussed inde-
`
`pt.~ndently and in parallel over tht~ plurality of independently-operable ver-
`
`tic a 1 inten .. :unnet:t buses.
`
`l 0.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 8, \vherein at least one of:
`
`the memory anay and memory controller together term a memory,
`
`the memory being reconfigurable by operation of the memory controller;
`
`the other of the stacked,, thin, substantially t1exib!e circuit layers
`
`comprises circuitry for perfbnning functional testing of the memory array.
`
`11.
`
`.A. stacked circuit structure comprising:
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 4 of 613
`
`

`

`a plurality of stacked, thin, substantially fkxible circuit lay(~rs or
`
`\vidng layt~rs each comprising a top surface and a bottom surface and at
`
`least one of which {.:omprises a thinned, substantially Hexiblc semkonduc-
`
`tor substrate of one piece;
`
`'NlK~rein a pa:ir of vertkaHy adja{.:ent {.:ircuit layers or \Viring layers
`
`is joined togetht~r using metal-to-tnetal bonding as a sole or primary mech-
`
`anism of both attad1ment and ek~ctrkal interconnection.
`
`12.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 11, cornprising an interlayer joining the
`
`pair ofvertkal!y adjacent circuit layers or wiring layers, the interlay·er comprising
`
`both signa1-can)'ing metal contacts and non-signal-carrying metal bonding areas.
`
`13.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 11, wherein the thinned, substantially tlexi-
`
`b!e semiconductor substrate comprises a plurality of etched through-holes each
`
`surrounding a vertical interconnect, each vertical interconnect comprising a con-
`
`ductor and an insulator surrounding the conductor and isolating the conductor
`
`tl-om the thinned, substantially flexible semiconductor substrate.
`
`14.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 13, w·hcrein the insulator comprises lo\v-
`
`stJess dielectric material having u stress of 5 x l 08 dynesic.m2 tensile or k$S.
`
`15.
`
`The apparatus of Claim ll, comprising a !ow-stress dielectric layer
`
`fonned above the thinned, substantially flexible semiconductor substrate,. \vherein
`
`the low-stress dielectric layer exhibits net tensile stress.
`
`16.
`
`The apparatus of Claim t5, •vherein the lmv-stress dielectric layer
`8
`..,
`has a stress of 5 x I 0' dynes/em':. tensile or less.
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 5 of 613
`
`

`

`17.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 11, ,.., .. ·herein a backside of the thinned, sub-
`
`stantially tlexible Stmliconductor substrate is polished to reduce vulnerabllity to
`
`fi:-a,~ture as a result of flexing and is '-kvoid of integrated circuitry
`
`18.
`
`The apparatus of ClaiJn ll, con1prising a p!uxality of stacked, thin,
`
`substantially flexible circuit layers, one of the stacked, thin, substantially tlex.ible
`
`circuit layers comprising a rnemory array and another of the stacked,. thin, snhstml(cid:173)
`
`tially tle.xible circuit la)ters comprising a memory controller for controlling the
`
`menwry array.
`
`19.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 18, wherein the one ofthe stacked, thin,
`
`substantially :t1exible circuit layers comprises a plurality of independently-operable
`
`memory arrays, the memOI)' controller being configured to control the plurality of
`
`independently-operable memory array·s independently and in parallel:,
`
`funher comprising a plurality of indepently-operable vertical inter(cid:173)
`
`connect buses, \Vherein data exchanged bet\\'een the memory controHer
`
`and tl1e plurality of independently-operable memory arrays is bussed inde(cid:173)
`
`pendently and in parallel over the plurality of independently-operable ver(cid:173)
`
`tical interconnet:t buses.
`
`20.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 8, >vherein at !east one of:
`
`the mcmor.Y an-ay and memory <::ontro!ler together f(xm a men:lQry,
`
`the mt~mory being recont1gurab!e by opt~ration of the memory controller;
`
`the other of the stacked, thin, substantially Hexib!e 1.:ircuit layers
`
`1.:ompdses circuitry for performing functional testing oftht~ memory array.
`
`21.
`
`A stacked circuit structure comprising:
`
`a plurality of stacked,. thin, sul.1stantially flexible circuit layers or
`
`\viring layers each comprising a top surface and a bottom suti"'ace and at
`
`least one of \vhich cmnprises a thinned, substantiaHy flexible semiconduc-
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 6 of 613
`
`

`

`tor substnrte of one piect.~;
`
`\Vherein a pair of adjacent ones of th.~ stacked, thin, substantially
`
`Hexible dn.:uit layers or \Viring layers is bon(kd togetlwr at least predomi-
`
`nantly with metal, or at l!i.~ast pr~~dominantly ·with sihcon-based dielectric
`
`and metal;
`
`22.
`
`The apparatus of ClaiJn 21, comprising an interlayer joining the
`
`pair of adjacent ones of the stacked, thin, substantially Hexihle circuit layers or
`
`\·viring layers, the interlayer co1npris:ing signal-carrying tnetal contacts and non-
`
`signal-carrying xnetal bonding areas.
`
`23.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 21, "vherein the thinned, substantially f1exi-
`
`ble semiconductor substrate comprises a plurality of etched through-holes each
`
`surrounding a 1/eltical interconnect, each vertical interconnect comprising a con-
`
`ductor and an insulator surrounding the conductor and isolating the conductor
`
`from the thinned,. substantially flexible semiconductor substrate.
`
`24.
`
`Tht.~ apparatus of Claim 23, \!,therein the insulator comprises knv-
`
`stress dielectric tnaterial having a stress of 5 x I 08 dynes.i'cm2 tensile or less.
`
`25.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 21, comprising a lO\'i~'-stress dielectric layer
`
`formed above the thinned,. substantially flexible semiconductor substrate, \Vhere1n
`
`the lmv~stress dielectric layer exhibits net tensile stress.
`
`26.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 25, wherein the low-stress dielectric layer
`:;;;
`has a stress of 5 x lO' dynes,...'cm"' tensile or less.
`
`.
`
`')
`
`27.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 21, \Vherein a backside of the thinned, sub-
`
`s:tantially t1exible sexniconductor substrate is polished to reduce vulnerability to
`
`fractllH! as a result <.Jf Hexing and is devoid of integrated circuitry.
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 7 of 613
`
`

`

`28.
`
`The apparatus of Claim 21, comprising a plurality of stacked, thin,
`
`substantially t1exible circuit layers, one of the stacked, thin, substantially flexible
`
`(:ircnit layt~rs compr1sing ~t memory array and another of the stacked, thin, substan~
`
`tially Hexible circuit layers comprising a tnemory' controller for controlling the
`
`memory anay.
`
`29.
`
`The apparatus ofCiaiJn 28, \.vberein the one of the stacked, thin,
`
`substantially tlexible circuit layers comprises a plura!.ity of independently-operable
`
`menwry arrays, the xnenw1y controller being configured to control the pluralit_y of
`
`independently-operable mernory arrays independently and in parallel;
`
`further comprising a plurality of indepently-operable vertical inter(cid:173)
`
`connect buses, \vherein data exchanged bet\veen the metJlOl)' controller
`
`and the plurality of independently-operable rnemory arraj,·s is bussed inde~
`
`pendently and in parallel over the pluralhy· of independently·-opemble ver(cid:173)
`
`tical interconnect buses.
`
`30,
`
`The apparatus of Claim 28, wherein at least one of:
`
`the memory array and memory controller together tonn a m.emory,
`
`the memory' being reconfigurable b).t operation of the memory controller;
`
`the other of the stacked, thin, substantially t1exible circuit layers
`
`comprises circuitry for perfom1ing functional testing of the memory array,
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 8 of 613
`
`

`

`Electronic Patent Application Fee Transmittal
`
`Application Number:
`
`Filing Date:
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`Three dimensional memory structure
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Glenn J Leedy
`
`Filer:
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`Filed as Small Entity
`
`Michael James Ure
`
`130809NEW.US
`
`Track I Prioritized Examination -Non provisional Application under 35 USC 111 (a) Filing Fees
`
`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Amount
`
`Sub-Total in
`USD($)
`
`Utility filing Fee (Electronic filing)
`
`Utility Search Fee
`
`Utility Examination Fee
`
`Request for Prioritized Examination
`
`4011
`
`2111
`
`2311
`
`2817
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`70
`
`300
`
`360
`
`70
`
`300
`
`360
`
`2000
`
`2000
`
`Basic Filing:
`
`Pages:
`
`Claims:
`
`Claims in excess of 20
`
`2202
`
`10
`
`40
`
`400
`
`Miscellaneous-Filing:
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 9 of 613
`
`

`

`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Amount
`
`Sub-Total in
`USD($)
`
`Publ. Fee- Early, Voluntary, or Normal
`
`OTHER PUBLICATION PROCESSING FEE
`
`1504
`
`1808
`
`1
`
`1
`
`300
`
`130
`
`300
`
`130
`
`Petition:
`
`Patent-Appeals-and-Interference:
`
`Post-Allowance-and-Post-Issuance:
`
`Extension-of-Time:
`
`Miscellaneous:
`
`Total in USD ($)
`
`3560
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 10 of 613
`
`

`

`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`EFSID:
`
`Application Number:
`
`16547690
`
`13963164
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Confirmation Number:
`
`8709
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`Three dimensional memory structure
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Glenn J Leedy
`
`Customer Number:
`
`30232
`
`Filer:
`
`Michael James Ure
`
`Filer Authorized By:
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`130809NEW.US
`
`Receipt Date:
`
`09-AUG-2013
`
`Filing Date:
`
`TimeStamp:
`
`12:48:28
`
`Application Type:
`
`Utility under 35 USC 111 (a)
`
`Payment information:
`
`Submitted with Payment
`
`Payment Type
`
`Payment was successfully received in RAM
`
`RAM confirmation Number
`
`yes
`
`Credit Card
`
`$3560
`
`10122
`
`Deposit Account
`
`Authorized User
`
`File Listing:
`Document I
`Number
`
`Document Description
`
`I
`
`File Name
`
`I
`
`File Size( Bytes)/ I Multi 'I Pages
`(ifappl.)
`Message Digest
`Part /.zip
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 11 of 613
`
`

`

`1
`
`13734874.pdf
`
`yes
`
`36
`
`1174851
`
`Multipart Description/PDF files in .zip description
`
`4c146ddc6713c39dd9fa8305a88661 07296
`d8d96
`
`Document Description
`
`Start
`
`End
`
`Specification
`
`Abstract
`
`Drawings-only black and white line drawings
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`26
`
`27
`
`36
`
`1
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1504793
`
`2
`
`Application Data Sheet
`
`aia0014.pdf
`
`no
`
`7
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`519273f5d883d32c12c37f5f5aa9d 1877d8d
`0605
`
`445937
`
`3
`
`Oath or Declaration filed
`
`EPSON004.pdf
`
`no
`
`1
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`5d483a42e1 d07a5b3ad58753ab860b 1 af33
`5811f
`
`140150
`
`4
`
`TrackOne Request
`
`sb0424.pdf
`
`no
`
`2
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`c2 6a2 0487 ac 798c1 b08a09cf3982a579f08b
`e06d
`
`1747273
`
`5
`
`Claims
`
`newCiaims1.pdf
`
`no
`
`6
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`3001 d005e21459465643f0db302574be611
`5d311
`
`41655
`
`6
`
`Fee Worksheet (SB06)
`
`fee-info. pdf
`
`no
`
`2
`
`6f614eef7 a9ca4c68c3f9eaf4ff8d dfb 7 4 28be
`eb
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`Total Files Size (in bytes)
`
`5054659
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 12 of 613
`
`

`

`This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO of the indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable. It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`If a new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary components for a filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)-(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shown on this
`Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the filing date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`If a timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/E0/903 indicating acceptance of the application as a
`national stage submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`If a new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 181 0), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and of the International Filing Date (Form PCT/R0/1 OS) will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shown on this Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the international filing date of
`the application.
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 13 of 613
`
`

`

`THREE DIMENSION STRUCTURE MEMORY
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`The present invention relates to stacked integrated circuit memory.
`
`2. State of the Art
`
`Manufacturing methods for increasing the performance and decreasing the cost of electronic
`
`circuits, nearly without exception, are methods that increase the integration of the circuit and
`
`decrease its physical size per equivalent number of circuit devices such as transistors or
`
`capacitors. These methods have produced as of 1996 microprocessors capable of over 100
`
`million operations per second that cost less than $1,000 and 64 Mbit DRAM circuits that access
`
`data in less than 50 ns and cost less than $50. The physical size of such circuits is less than 2
`
`cm2. Such manufacturing methods support to a large degree the economic standard of living in
`
`the major industrialized countries and will most certainly continue to have significant
`
`consequences in the daily lives of people all over the world.
`
`Circuit manufacturing methods take two primary forms: process integration and assembly
`
`integration. Historically the line between these two manufacturing disciplines has been clear, but
`
`recently with the rise in the use ofMCMs (Multi-Chip Modules) and flip-chip die attach, this
`
`clear separation may soon disappear. (The predominate use of the term Integrated Circuit (IC)
`
`herein is in reference to an Integrated Circuit in singulated die form as sawed from a circuit
`
`substrate such as s semiconductor wafer versus, for example, an Integrated Circuit in packaged
`
`form.) The majority ofiCs when in initial die form are presently individually packaged,
`
`however, there is an increasing use ofMCMs. Die in an MCM are normally attached to a circuit
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 14 of 613
`
`

`

`substrate in a planar fashion with conventional IC die I/0 interconnect bonding methods such as
`
`wire bonding, DCA (Direct Chip Attach) or FCA (Flip-Chip Attach).
`
`Integrated circuit memory such as DRAM, SRAM, flash EPROM, EEPROM, Ferroelectric,
`
`GMR (Giant MagnetoResistance), etc. have the common architectural or structural characteristic
`
`of being monolithic with the control circuitry integrated on the same die with the memory array
`
`circuitry. This established (standard or conventional) architecture or circuit layout structure
`
`creates a design trade-off constraint between control circuitry and memory array circuitry for
`
`large memory circuits. Reductions in the fabrication geometries of memory cell circuitry has
`
`resulted in denser and denser memory ICs, however, these higher memory densities have
`
`resulted in more sophisticated control circuitry at the expense of increased area of the IC.
`
`Increased IC area means at least higher fabrication costs per IC (fewer ICs per wafer) and lower
`
`IC yields (fewer working ICs per wafer), and in the worst case, an IC design that cannot be
`
`manufactured due to its non-competitive cost or unreliable operation.
`
`As memory density increases and the individual memory cell size decreases more control
`
`circuitry is required. The control circuitry of a memory IC as a percentage ofiC area in some
`
`cases such as DRAMs approaches or exceeds 40%. One portion of the control circuitry is the
`
`sense amp which senses the state, potential or charge of a memory cell in the memory array
`
`circuitry during a read operation. The sense amp circuitry is a significant portion of the control
`
`circuitry and it is a constant challenge to the IC memory designer to improve sense amp
`
`sensitivity in order to sense ever smaller memory cells while preventing the area used by the
`
`sense amp from becoming too large.
`
`2
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 15 of 613
`
`

`

`If this design constraint or trade-offbetween control and memory circuits did not exist, the
`
`control circuitry could be made to perform numerous additional functions, such as sensing
`
`multiple storage states per memory cell, faster memory access through larger more sensitive
`
`sense amps, caching, refresh, address translation, etc. But this trade-off is the physical and
`
`economic reality for memory ICs as they are presently made by all manufacturers.
`
`The capacity of DRAM circuits increases by a factor of four from one generation to the next; e.g.
`
`1 bit, 4 bit, 16 Mbit and 64 Mbit DRAMs. This four times increase in circuit memory capacity
`
`per generation has resulted in larger and larger DRAM circuit areas. Upon introduction of a new
`
`DRAM generation the circuit yields are too low and, therefore, not cost effective for high
`
`volume manufacture. It is normally several years between the date prototype samples of a new
`
`DRAM generation are shown and the date such circuits are in volume production.
`
`Assembling die in a stacked or three dimensional (3D) manner is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
`
`5,354,695 of the present inventor, incorporated herein by reference. Furthermore, assembling die
`
`in a 3D manner has been attempted with regard to memory. Texas Instruments of Dallas Tex.,
`
`Irvine Sensors of Costa Mesa Calif. and Cubic Memory Corporation of Scotts Valley Calif. have
`
`all attempted to produce stacked or 3D DRAM products. In all three cases, conventional DRAM
`
`circuits in die form were stacked and the interconnect between each DRAM in the stack was
`
`formed along the outside surface of the circuit stack. These products have been available for the
`
`past several years and have proved to be too expensive for commercial applications, but have
`
`found some use in space and military applications due to their small physical size or footprint.
`
`3
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 16 of 613
`
`

`

`The DRAM circuit type is referred to and often used as an example in this specification,
`
`however, this invention is clearly not limited to the DRAM type of circuit. Undoubtedly memory
`
`cell types such as EEPROMs (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memories), flash
`
`EPROM, Ferroelectric, GMR Giant Magneto Resistance or combinations (intra or inter) of such
`
`memory cells can also be used with the present Three Dimensional Structure (3DS) methods to
`
`form 3DS memory devices.
`
`The present invention furthers, among others, the following objectives:
`
`1. Several-fold lower fabrication cost per megabyte of memory than circuits conventionally
`
`made solely with monolithic circuit integration methods.
`
`2. Several-fold higher performance than conventionally made memory circuits.
`
`3. Many-fold higher memory density per IC than conventionally made memory circuits.
`
`4. Greater designer control of circuit area size, and therefore, cost.
`
`5. Circuit dynamic and static self-test of memory cells by an internal controller.
`
`6. Dynamic error recovery and reconfiguration.
`
`7. Multi-level storage per memory cell.
`
`8. Virtual address translation, address windowing, various address functions such as indirect
`
`addressing or content addressing, analog circuit functions and various graphics acceleration and
`
`microprocessor functions.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present 3DS memory technology is a stacked or 3D circuit assembly technology. Features
`
`include:
`
`4
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 17 of 613
`
`

`

`1. Physical separation of the memory circuits and the control logic circuit onto different layers;
`
`2. The use of one control logic circuit for several memory circuits;
`
`3. Thinning of the memory circuit to less than about 50 microns in thickness forming a
`
`substantially flexible substrate with planar processed bond surfaces and bonding the circuit to the
`
`circuit stack while still in wafer substrate form; and
`
`4. The use of fine-grain high density inter layer vertical bus connections.
`
`The 3DS memory manufacturing method enables several performance and physical size
`
`efficiencies, and is implemented with established semiconductor processing techniques. Using
`
`the DRAM circuit as an example, a 64 Mbit DRAM made with a 0.25 microns process could
`
`have a die size of 84 mm2
`
`, a memory area to die size ratio of 40% and a access time of about 50
`
`ns for 8 Mbytes of storage; a 3DS DRAM IC made with the same 0.25 microns process would
`
`have a die size of 18.6 mm2
`
`, use 17 DRAM array circuit layers, a memory area to die size ratio
`
`of 94.4% and an expected access time ofless than 10 ns for 64 Mbytes of storage.
`
`The 3DS DRAM IC manufacturing method represents a scalable, many-fold reduction in the cost
`
`per megabyte versus that of conventional DRAM IC manufacturing methods. In other words,
`
`the 3DS memory manufacturing method represents, at the infrastructure level, a fundamental
`
`cost savings that is independent of the process fabrication technology used.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
`
`The present invention may be further understood from the following description in conjunction
`
`with the appended drawing. In the drawing:
`
`5
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 18 of 613
`
`

`

`FIG. la is a pictorial view of a 3DS DRAM IC manufactured with Method A or Method Band
`
`demonstrating the same physical appearance ofl/0 bond pads as a conventional IC die;
`
`FIG. 1 b is a cross-sectional view of a 3DS memory IC showing the metal bonding interconnect
`
`between several thinned circuit layers;
`
`FIG. lc is a pictorial view of a 3DS DRAM IC stack bonded and interconnected face-down onto
`
`a larger conventional IC or another 3DS IC;
`
`FIG. 2a is a diagram showing the physical layout of a 3DS DRAM array circuit block with one
`
`data-line set of bus lines, i.e. one port;
`
`FIG. 2b is a diagram showing the physical layout of a 3DS DRAM array circuit block with two
`
`sets of data-line bus lines, i.e. two ports;
`
`FIG. 2c is a diagram showing the physical layout of a portion of an exemplary memory
`
`controller circuit;
`
`FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the physical layout of a 3DS DRAM array circuit showing
`
`partitions for sixty-four (64) 3DS DRAM array blocks;
`
`FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of a generic 3DS vertical interconnection or feed-through in a
`
`thinned substrate;
`
`6
`
`MICRON ET AL. EXHIBIT 1017
`Page 19 of 613
`
`

`

`FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the layout of a 3DS memory multiplexer for down-selecting gate(cid:173)
`
`line read or write selection.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`
`Referr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket