`
` 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
` 2 TYLER DIVISION
` 3
` VIRNETX, INC. )
` 4 DOCKET NO. 6:10cv417
` -vs- )
` 5 Tyler, Texas
` ) 12:05 p.m.
` 6 APPLE, INC. November 5, 2012
` 7
` 8 TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL
` AFTERNOON SESSION
` 9 BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONARD DAVIS,
` UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY
` 10
` 11
` 12 A P P E A R A N C E S
` 13
` 14 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS:
` 15
` MR. DOUGLAS CAWLEY
` 16 MR. BRADLEY W. CALDWELL
` MR. JASON D. CASSADY
` 17 MR. JOHN AUSTIN CURRY
` McKOOL SMITH
` 18 300 Crescent Court, Ste. 1500
` Dallas, TX 75201
` 19
` 20
` 21 COURT REPORTERS: MS. JUDITH WERLINGER
` MS. SHEA SLOAN
` 22 shea_sloan@txed.uscourts.gov
` 23
` 24 Proceedings taken by Machine Stenotype; transcript was
` produced by a Computer.
` 25
`
`VirnetX Exhibit 2014
`Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2016-00693
`Trial PGR2016-00007
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
` 39
`
` 1 A. No, it's not.
` 2 Q. So what --
` 3 A. What we see here, the missing element is to
` 4 store a plurality of domain names and corresponding
` 5 network addresses. That's also not taught in Kiuchi.
` 6 Q. Okay. Again, Apple's lawyer claimed that you
` 7 backpedaled from -- from this analysis from your expert
` 8 report.
` 9 Is that accurate?
` 10 A. No, that's not true.
` 11 MR. CURRY: Mr. Moreno, can you show
` 12 Dr. Jones' deposition testimony at Page 249, Lines 2
` 13 through 7?
` 14 Q. (By Mr. Curry) This is the Q and A that was
` 15 shown to the jury by Apple's lawyer.
` 16 Do you stand by this testimony?
` 17 A. Absolutely. I'm being asked to assume that
` 18 the appendix accurately describes the system. And under
` 19 that hypothetical situation, I give them an answer.
` 20 Q. And in your deposition testimony, didn't you
` 21 explain how the appendix is inaccurate in Kiuchi?
` 22 A. Yes. I believe I did that more than once.
` 23 MR. CURRY: Mr. Moreno, can you go to
` 24 Page 232, Lines 8 through 25?
` 25 Q. (By Mr. Curry) Can you explain what you're
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
` 40
`
` 1 talking about here?
` 2 A. So I'm being asked about what the discrepancy
` 3 that I've identified between the body of Kiuchi, the
` 4 explanation, the main body of his paper, and what is
` 5 pointed to in Appendix 2.
` 6 And what I explain is that I certainly can
` 7 reconcile it that what's being described in the way
` 8 Kiuchi has to function, once one analyzes the system, is
` 9 that it's the name of an origin server that's -- that
` 10 should be there; and that the appendix, which indicates
` 11 that it's a server-side proxy, is actually incorrect.
` 12 Q. And, in fact, didn't we hear earlier that Dr.
` 13 Kiuchi fixed the error in his appendix?
` 14 A. Yes. We saw that on the slides earlier today.
` 15 Q. Would the Kiuchi system work if the
` 16 client-side proxy requested a domain name for the
` 17 server-side proxy from C-HTTP?
` 18 A. No. The way Kiuchi has to work is that what's
` 19 being requested is the resource that's on the origin
` 20 server. That's where the data is.
` 21 Q. Can you show us how you knew that?
` 22 A. Yes. We can look at the body of Kiuchi.
` 23 MR. CURRY: Would you go to Slide 10,
` 24 please, Mr. Moreno?
` 25 A. This is -- this is from Kiuchi, and it's one
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
` 41
`
` 1 of the steps in the process of creating the connection,
` 2 and this is talking about the lookup of the server-side
` 3 proxy information.
` 4 And what's described here is that the
` 5 client-side proxy, which is that device up there on the
` 6 left with the red circle around it, is asking the C-HTTP
` 7 name server, which is the device at the top, if it can
` 8 communicate with the host specified in a given URL.
` 9 And URL stands for uniform resource locator.
` 10 It's asking for a resource. As we heard earlier, the
` 11 resources in Kiuchi, as they are in an HTTP system, are
` 12 in the origin server on the far right. So it's
` 13 asking -- the name it's asking for in the URL is the
` 14 name for the origin server, that resource.
` 15 Q. Would the C-HTTP name server in Kiuchi have
` 16 any reason to store a domain name for the server-side
` 17 proxy?
` 18 A. No, because that's not what's going to be
` 19 requested. It doesn't have the resource that's being
` 20 requested.
` 21 Q. Since Kiuchi doesn't teach secure
` 22 communication links or storing domain names with
` 23 corresponding network addresses, can it anticipate any
` 24 claim of the '504/'211 patent?
` 25 A. No, it can't. Those are both requirements of
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
` 179
`
` 1 COURT SECURITY OFFICER: All rise.
` 2 (Court adjourned.)
` 3
` 4 CERTIFICATION
` 5
` 6 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a
` 7 true and correct transcript from the stenographic notes
` 8 of the proceedings in the above-entitled matter to the
` 9 best of our abilities.
` 10
` 11
` 12 /s/ Shea Sloan
` SHEA SLOAN, CSR
` 13 Official Court Reporter
` State of Texas No.: 3081
` 14 Expiration Date: 12/31/12
` 15
` 16
` /s/ Judith Werlinger
` 17 JUDITH WERLINGER, CSR
` Deputy Official Court Reporter
` 18 State of Texas No.: 731
` Expiration Date 12/31/12
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
`
`Page 5 of 5
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
