throbber
Adverse drug reactions
`
`Pharmacogenetics and adverse drug reactions
`
`ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS
`
`Urs A Meyer
`
`Polymorphisms in the genes that code for drug-metabolising enzymes, drug transporters, drug receptors, and ion
`channels can affect an individual’s risk of having an adverse drug reaction, or can alter the efficacy of drug
`treatment in that individual. Mutant alleles at a single gene locus are the best studied individual risk factors for
`adverse drug reactions, and include many genes coding for drug-metabolising enzymes. These genetic
`polymorphisms of drug metabolism produce the phenotypes of “poor metabolisers” or “ultrarapid metabolisers” of
`numerous drugs. Together, such phenotypes make up a substantial proportion of the population. Pharmacogenomic
`techniques allow efficient analysis of these risk factors, and genotyping tests have the potential to optimise drug
`mtmm
`
`The person—to—person variability of a drug response is a
`major problem in
`clinical practice
`and in drug
`development.
`It can lead to therapeutic failure or
`adverse effects of drugs in individuals or subpopulations
`of patients. The occurrence of serious or fatal adverse
`drug reactions has been extensively analysed in hospital
`inpatients. A meta—analysis of 39 prospective studies
`from US hospitals suggests that 6-7% of inpatients have
`seriousadvepsedrugreaetionsand0-3°°(aha—vefatal
`reactions, the latter causing about 100000 deaths per
`year
`in the USA. This figure makes adverse drug
`reactions between the fourth and sixth leading causes of
`death in hospital inpatients.‘
`What determines an individual’s risk of developing an
`adverse drug reaction or of gaining no benefit from the
`drug? How much of this pharmacological variability can
`be predicted? How many adverse drug reactions can
`thereby be prevented? These are some of the questions
`addressed in this review.
`
`History of pharmacogenetics
`Pharmacogenetics had its beginning in the 1950s when
`researchers realised that some adverse drug reactions
`could be caused by genetically determined variations in
`enzyme
`activity. For
`example,
`prolonged muscle
`relaxation after suxamethonium was explained by an
`inherited deficiency of a plasma cholinesterase, and
`haemolysis caused by antimalarials was recognised as
`I.
`11.1.!
`E16
`phosphate dehydrogenase. Similarly, inherited changes
`in a patient’s ability to acetylate isoniazid was found to
`be the cause of the peripheral neuropathy caused by this
`drug. Nlore recently, adverse drug reactions such as
`nausea,
`diplopia,
`and
`blurred
`vision
`after
`the
`antiarrhythmic
`and
`oxytocic
`drug
`sparteine,
`or
`incapacitating
`orthostatic
`hypotension
`after
`the
`antihypertensive
`agent
`debrisoquine
`have
`led
`to
`the discovery of
`the genetic polymorphism of
`the
`drug—n1etabolising
`enzyme Cytochrome P450
`2D6
`(C¥P%D6).7 Adverse drug reactions were
`also the
`clinical events that revealed genetic variants of other
`drug—metabolising enzymes or drug targets, a selection
`of which is
`listed in table
`l.“*’” Thus, genetic
`polymorphisms
`were
`discovered
`by
`incidental
`observations
`that
`some
`patients
`or
`volunteers
`experienced unpleasant and disturbing adverse drug
`reactions when given standard doses of drugs.
`
`Genotype and phenotype
`Molecular genetics and genomics (the study of the entire
`. '
`I
`L" .
`V"
`.
`" I
`' '
`'
`.5
`
`in the past decade. The two alleles carried by an
`individual at a given gene locus,
`referred to as the
`genotype, can now be characterised at the DNA level;
`their influence on the kinetics of the drug or a receptor
`function, the phenotype, can be measured by advanced
`analytical methods
`for metabolite detection or by
`sophisticated
`clinical
`investigations—eg,
`receptor-
`density studies by positron emission tomography.
`Molecular studies in pharmacogenetics started with the
`cloning and characterisation of CYP2D6,“’ and have
`now been extended to numerous other human genes,
`including those
`coding for more
`than 20 drug-
`metabolising enzymes and drug receptors, and several
`drug transport
`systems
`(www.sciencemag.org/feature/
`data/104'-l449.shl).
`More than 70 variant alleles of the CYPZD6 locus have
`been
`described
`(www.imm.ki.se/CYPalleles/cyp2d6.
`htm), of which at least 15 encode non—functional gene
`
`Lancet 2000; 356: 1667-71
`
`Division of Pharmacology/Neurobiology, Biozentrum of the
`University of Basel, CH—4056 Basel, Switzerland (U A Meyer MD)
`(e-mail: Urs—A_Meyer@unibas_ch)
`
`THE LANCET - Vol 356 - November ll, 2000
`
`1667
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2035 - Page 1
`
`VNDA 02700304
`
`
`
`include drug—drug interactions, the patient’s age, renal
`and liver function or other disease factors, and lifestyle
`variables such as smoking and alcohol consumption.
`Of even greater importance in the determination of
`individual
`risk are inherited factors that affect
`the
`kinetics and dynamics of numerous drugs. Thus, genetic
`variation in genes
`for drug—metabolising enzymes,
`drug receptors,
`and drug transporters have been
`associated with individual variability in the efficacy
`and toxicity of drugs.“ It
`is of course difficult
`to
`
`in an individual patient. A major
`genetic factors
`difference between genetic and environmental variation
`is
`that
`an inherited mutation or
`trait
`is present
`throughout life and has to be tested for only once in a
`lifetime, whereas environmental effects are continually
`changing. If mutant or variant genes exist at a frequency
`of more than 1% in the normal population, they are
`called genetic polymorphisms? Genetic polymorphisms
`explain why a small proportion of the population may be
`at higher risk of drug inefficacy or toxicity; the study of
`such polymorphisms has given rise to the field of
`pharmacogenetics.”
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2035 - Page 1
`
`

`
`gene products involved in drug disposition and drug
`action. Polygenic inheritance is more difficult to detect
`and to distinguish from environmental
`factors. The
`analysis of polygenic inheritance is similar to the analysis
`of complex diseases such as cancer, mental diseases,
`arthritis, and asthma, in which primary genes, modifier
`genes and environmental factors interact.""”
`A simple method to distinguish between hereditary
`and environmental components of variability is
`the
`comparison of small series of monozygotic and dizygotic
`twins, or repeated drug administration and comparison
`of the variability of the responses within and between
`individuals as proposed by Kalow.“’ The techniques have
`revealed
`important
`genetic
`factors
`in
`the
`pharmacokinetics
`of
`drugs
`such
`as
`dicoumarol,
`halothane, phenytoin, tolbutamide, and midazolam.
`In the future, the discovery of pharmacogenetic traits
`
`Drug effect
`
`ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS
`
`Enzyme
`
`CYP2C9
`
`CYPQDG
`
`Drug
`
`Frequency of
`polymorphism
`14-28% (heterozygotes) Wariarin
`O-2—:L%(homozygotes)
`Tolbutarride
`Phenytoln
`Glipizide
`Losartan
`
`/mtiarrlrythmics
`
`540% {poor
`metabolisers)
`1—10% {ultra-rapid
`metabolisers)
`
`Haemorrhagei
`Hypoglycaemiai
`Prienytoln toxicity”
`Hypoglycaeniia”
`Decreased
`arltihypertensive effect“
`Proarrhythmic and
`other toxic e"fects3
`Antidepressants Toxicity in poor
`rretabolisers, ireffrcaey
`in ultrarapid metabolisersi
`Tardive dysklnesiai
`Irefficacy of codeine as
`analgesic, narcotic side-
`effects. dependence‘
`Increased B—b|ocl<ade3
`
`Antipsychotios
`Opioids
`
`Badrenoceptor
`antagonists
`Omeprazole
`
`Diazepam
`Fluorouracrl
`
`Higher cure rates when
`given witr clarithrom;/cin1*
`Prolongec seclation3
`Neuroioxicity,
`rryelotoxicity“
`
`Succinylcholire
`
`Prolongec apnoea’
`
`Sulphonamides Hypersensitil/ity3
`Amonafide
`Mylelotoxrcrty (rapid
`acetylators)“
`Drcginduccc lupus
`erythematosus‘
`
`Prooalnamide,
`hydralazine,
`isoniazid
`Merccptopurinc,
`tniogtanine,
`azotnioprine
`Irinotecan
`
`Myelotoxicity“
`
`Diarrhoea,
`rryelosbppression“
`
`CYP2C19
`
`3-696 (whites)
`8—23% lAsrans)
`
`Dihydropyri-
`midine dehyclro-
`genase
`Plasma pseudo
`cholinesterase
`N-acety|trans-
`ferase
`
`0-1°/n
`
`1-5%
`
`40-70% (whites)
`10-20% (Asians)
`
`03%
`
`Thropurire
`methyltrans
`ferase
`UDP—gIucurorlosyI— 10—:L5%
`transierase
`
`Table 1: Clinically important genetic polymorphisms of drug
`metabolism that influence drug response
`
`products. These alleles are different from the normal
`(wild—type) gene by one or more point mutations, but
`
`
`
`
`
`genomics. Rapid sequencing and single—nucleotide
`polymorphisms (SNPS) will have a major role in the
`linking of sequence variations with heritable clinical
`phenotypes of drug response. SNPs occur in about one
`of every 100-1500 bp of the genomes if two unrelated
`individuals are compared. Any two individuals therefore
`differ by about 3 million bp—ie, in only about 0-1% of
`the 3 billion bp of the haploid genome. Common or
`informative SNPS are those that occur at frequencies of
`greater than 1%, or even better, of greater than 10%.
`Qneea—largenu~ml9eroftheseSN-Psaandtheir
`frequencies in different populations are known, they can
`be used to correlate a patient’s genetic “fingerprint” with
`the probable individual drug response.°~'*5 SNPs in coding
`regions of genes (about 30 000—l00 000 per genome)
`can cause aminoacid changes and changes in protein
`function, or they can be neutral. SNPS inside genes or in
`regulatory regions can cause differences
`in protein
`expression. The proteomes of two individuals can differ
`by only 30 000 proteins, and some of these differences
`might affect drug response. The ability to predict
`
`‘
`“ ‘
`‘
`‘
`““‘ “
`“‘ 6r 0fl
`the basis of genetic factors will
`thus be a realistic
`scenario for future drug treatments.
`
`multiduplications. The mutations can have no effect on
`enzyme activity, or can code for enzymes with decreased
`or absent activity; duplications lead to increased enzyme
`activity.
`Extensive metabolisers
`are
`defined
`as
`individuals homozygous or heterozygous for the wild-
`type or normal
`activity enzymes
`(75—85% of
`the
`population);
`intermediate metabolisers (10—l5%)” or
`poor metabolisers
`(5~l0%)
`are
`carriers
`of
`two
`decreased—activity alleles or loss—of—functi0n alleles; and
`ultrarapid metabolisers
`(l—10%)
`are
`carriers
`of
`
`II
`i
`‘I
`'
`I II i
`"'i
`V‘ 1‘ __
`-
`’Ii_
`the number and complexity of the mutations may be
`large overall, only a few mutant genes, usually three to
`five alleles, are common and account for most (usually
`>95%) of mutant alleles. These alleles can be detected
`by modern DNA methods,
`including DI\'A chip
`microarrays, allowing most patients to be assigned to a
`particular phenotype group.
`CYPZD6 remains one of the best studied polymorphic
`genes of pharmacological interest; numerous other genes
`have been or are presently being studied by identical
`approaches. The poor~metaboliser phenotype for most
`of the polymorphic genes is inherited as an autosomal
`recessive trait, requiring the presence of two mutant
`alleles. These considerations apply to monogenic traits,
`where one gene has a major effect on the phenotype and
`divides the population into two or three distinct groups.
`However,
`the responses to most medications are not
`monogenic but involve the interaction between multiple
`
`
`
`Population differences in pharmacogenetic
`traits
`All pharmacogenetic variations studied to date occur at
`different frequencies among subpopulations of different
`ethnic or racial origin. For instance, important cross-
`ethnic differences
`exist
`in the
`frequency of
`slow
`acetylators of
`isoniazid due
`to mutations of N-
`
`—
`.
`,
`-
`i
`3
`-
`.
`mutations of CYPZC9 and CYPZCI9, and
`metabolisers due to mutations of CYP2D6 (table 2).“
`Some of the mutations of these genes occur uniquely in
`certain ethnic subpopulations. This ethnic diversity, also
`called “gene geography”, implies that ethnic origin has
`to be considered in pharmacogenetic studies and in
`pharmacotherapy.
`
`Therapeutic issues
`In principle,
`three pharmacogenetic mechanisms can
`influence pharmacotherapy. The first and‘best studied to
`date are genetic polymorphisms of genes
`that are
`associated with altered metabolism of drugs
`(eg,
`metabolism of tricyclic antidepressants). Increased or
`decreased metabolism of
`a drug can change
`the
`concentrations of that drug, as well as those of its active,
`inactive, or toxic metabolites. Second, genetic variants
`can produce an unexpected drug effect (eg, haemolysis
`
`1668
`
`THE LANCET - Vol 356 - November 11, 2000
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2035 - Page 2
`
`VNDA 02700305
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2035 - Page 2
`
`

`
`ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS
`
`Genotype
`
`Frequency
`Whites
`
`Asians
`
`Black Africans
`
`Ethiopians & Saudi
`Arabians
`
`Homozygous or compound heterozygous for
`CYP2C9 *2 or *3
`Heterozygous for C‘YP2C9*2 or *3 (decreasec activity) 14-O—37-0%
`Homo ygois otcompo nd nereroazgo s for
`5-1-13-5%
`numerous |oss—of—function allclos
`
`0 2-1 0%
`
`ND
`
`2-O—3-0°/c
`ill —:I -0%
`
`l\D
`
`l\D
`
`O-5%
`Q-0-8-:I.°A 1 B-7°u)*
`
`l\D
`l'_8:2'O°u
`
`Gene duplication or rrulticluplication (dominant)
`
`1-0-10-0°/u
`
`O-0-2-O
`
`2-0%
`
`10-0-29-0%
`
`Homozygous or compound heterozygous for
`numerous decreased-function alleles
`
`40-0-70-0°/u
`
`10-0-20-0°/u
`
`50-0-60-0%
`
`l\D
`
`Poor metabolisers
`CYPZC9
`
`C_Y_l22D6
`
`Ultrarapid metabolisers
`CYPQDB
`Slow acetylators
`N-acyltransierase 2
`
`ND=rot determined. *In San bushmen.
`
`Table 2: Distribution of polymorphic genes encoding CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and N-acyltransferase 2 in different populations
`
`deficiency).
`dehydrogenase
`glucose—6—phosphate
`in
`Third,
`variation in a drug target can alter the
`clinical
`response and frequency of
`side—effects
`(eg,
`variants of the [5—adrenergic receptor alter response to 3-
`agonists in asthma patients).
`Whether a genetic polymorphism has relevance for
`drug therapy mainly depends on the characteristics of
`the drug in question. The quantitative role of a drug-
`metabolising enzyme, or a drug—uptal<e mechanisms in
`the overall kinetics of a drug and the agent’s therapeutic
`range will determine how much the dose has to be
`adjusted in poor metabolisers or ultrarapid metabolisers.
`"l1heexai=npleoftheC¥P2D6pol—ymorphismaga4r1
`provides incontroversible clinical evidence for
`these
`ideas.
`Nlost
`patients
`(about
`90%)
`require
`75—l50 mg/day of nortriptyline to reach a “therapeutic”
`plasma steady—state concentration of 200-600 nmol/L,
`but poor metabolisers need only 10—20 mg/day to reach
`the same concentrations. Ultrarapid metabolisers, on the
`other hand, may require 300—500 mg/day or even more
`to reach the same plasma concentration (figure).”‘”
`Obviously, if the genotype or phenotype of the patient is
`not known, poor metabolisers will be overdosed and be
`
`metabolisers will be underdosed.
`Another situation is presented if the therapeutic effect
`depends on the formation of an active metabolite (eg,
`morphine from codeine). Poor metabolisers will have no
`drug effect and ultrarapid metabolisers may have
`exaggerated drug responses.” The drug—related criteria
`that make a genetic polymorphism clinically relevant are
`similar to those for drug—concentration monitoring—ie,
`narrow therapeutic
`range
`or
`large
`intcrindividual
`
`In
`suspicion of overdose.
`variation in kinetics or
`pharn1aeogene1ies,ho_wever,asin.gleDIS.Atestdo.n.e
`once in a lifetime can identify the predisposition of
`patients, at least of those with extreme phenotypes.
`
`Examples of genetic polymorphisms affecting
`drug kinetics and drug toxicity
`Drug metabolism
`Many or most of the 50-100 drug—metabolising enzymes
`known are subject to common genetic polymorphisms.
`Table
`1
`lists
`some
`in which clinically important
`differences in drug response have been documented. As
`an example, there is substantial intcrindividual variation
`in plasma concentrations of antidepressants.“"
`
`anti-
`tricyclic
`the
`CYP2D6—The metabolism of
`depressants amitriptyline, clomipramine, desipramine,
`imipramine, and nortriptyline, and of the tetracyclic
`compounds maprotiline and mianserin is influenced by
`the CYPZD6 polymorphism to various degrees. For these
`agents, there are therefore two groups of patients that
`may pose clinical problems.
`The poor metabolisers (and to a lesser degree the
`
`plasma concentrations of tricyclic antidepressants when
`given recommended doses of
`the drugs. The other
`group are the ultrarapid metabolisers who are prone to
`therapeutic failure because the drug concentrations at
`normal doses are far too low (figure). 5—20% of patients
`can belong to one of these risk groups, depending on the
`population studied. Adverse effects clearly occur more
`frequently
`in
`poor metabolisers
`and may
`be
`misinterpreted as symptoms of depression and lead to
`erroneous further increases in the dose.
`
`in psychiatry are affected by the CYPZD6 polymorphism.
`The metabolism of
`the
`recently
`introduced
`antidepressant venlafazine is controlled by CYP2D6,
`and poor metabolisers have a substantially decreased
`oral clearance and increased cardiovascular toxicity.“
`This effect has been documented, however, in only a few
`patients so far. Another group of antidepressants are the
`selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors which interact
`with CYPZD6 in three different ways. Paroxetine,
`fluvoxamine, and fluoxetine are in part metabolised by
`CYPZEO. However,
`the phenotype
`differences
`in
`clearance or plasma concentrations are small in relation
`to the relatively large therapeutic index of these drugs.
`Of substantial importance is the ability of these agents to
`act
`as potent
`competitive
`inhibitors of CYI’2D6
`(paroxetine, fluoxetine). Such inhibition means that the
`elimination of other CYP2D6 substrates—eg, of tricyclic
`antidepressants—is impaired, and that phenotyping with
`
`I
`100
`
`20~3O
`
`80
`70
`60
`50
`40
`30
`20
`10
`O '
`Metabolic ratlo 0-01
`
`
`Numberofpatients
`
`n
`
`/
`
`,
`0-1
`
`1-0
`
`10
`
`Nortriptyline >500
`requirement
`(mg/day)
`
`300
`
`2L50»1OO
`
`Dose requirement for nortriptyline in patients with different
`cYP2D6 phenotypes"‘”
`Poor metabolisers are defined as individuals with a debrisoquine urinary
`metabolic ratio of >12-6 (dashed line).
`
`THE LANCET - Vol 356 - November 1], 2000
`
`1669
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2035 - Page 3
`
`VNDA 02700306
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2035 - Page 3
`
`

`
`ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS
`
`Gene
`Multidrug resistance
`gene LIVIDR1)”
`B, adrenergic receptor
`gene (,l32ARl”‘
`Sulphonylurea receptor
`gene (SURll
`LQT 1-5 mutations on
`five genes coding for
`cardiac ion crannelsl"
`
`Frequency
`24%
`
`Drug
`Digoxin
`
`37%
`
`Albuterol
`
`2—3%
`
`1—2%
`
`Tolbutamide
`
`Antiarrliytlimics,
`terfenadirie,
`many other drugs
`
`Drug effect
`Increased concentrations of
`digoxin in plasma
`Decreased response to B,
`aclrenergic agonists
`Decreased insulin response
`
`Sudden cardiac death due to
`long-QT syndrome
`
`Table 3: Clinically important genetic polymorphisms of drug
`targets and drug transporters
`
`debrisoquine, sparteine, or dextromethorphan results in
`false
`positive
`results
`or
`“phenocopies”
`of poor
`metabolisers,
`if serotonin—selective reuptake inhibitors
`are coadministered. These interactions are phenotype-
`dependent——ie,
`restricted to extensive metabolisers.
`Citalopram, fiuvoxamine, and sertraline do not share
`this inhibitory property and do not cause CYP2D6—
`specific interactions. Fluvoxamine is also a substrate and
`potent inhibitor of CYP1A2, and thus causes important
`interactions with drugs that are partly metabolised by
`this cytochrome P450 enzyme, such as amitriptyline,
`clomipramine, imipramine, clozapine, and theophylline.
`Thus, polymorphic drug metabolism affects
`a large
`number of drugs used in psychiatric patients, raising the
`question of how this
`information will be used by
`physicians
`in the future. Retrospective
`analysis of
`psychiatric patients treated with substrates of CYTPZD6
`strongly indicates that genotyping can improve efficacy,
`prevent adverse drug reactions, and decrease costs of
`therapy with these agents.“ Obviously, prospective trials
`are needed to prove the value of phenotyping or
`genotyping patients with depression in selecting the
`proper starting dose to increase therapeutic efficacy and
`prevent toxicity. Striking differences in the adverse drug
`reactions of opioids are associated with the CYPZD6
`polymorphism. Dextromethorphan,
`codeine, hydro-
`codone, oxycodone, ethylmorphine, and dihydrocodeine
`are
`dealkylated
`by
`polymorphic CYP2D6. The
`polymorphic O—demetliylation of codeine is of clinical
`importance when this drug is given as an analgesic.
`About 10% of codeine is O—demethylated to morphine,
`and this pathway is deficient in poor metabolisers. Poor
`metabolisers therefore experience no analgestic effects of
`codeine.“" Similarly,
`respiratory, psychomotor,
`and
`pupillary effects of codeine
`are decrease in poor
`metabolisers compared with extensive metabolisers.
`Codeine is frequently recommended as a drug of first
`choice for treatment of chronic severe pain. Physicians
`must appreciate that no analgesic effect is to be expected
`in the 5—l0% of whites who are of the poor metaboliser
`phenotype, or who are extensive metabolisers and
`receive concomitant treatment with a potent inhibitor of
`CYPZD6 such as quinidine. The inability to form active
`metabolites
`from opioids
`could
`protect
`poor
`metabolisers against oral opiate dependence.
`
`of a clinically important
`CYP2C9—Another example
`genetic polymorphism of drug metabolism is
`the
`association of variant alleles of CYPZC9 with lower
`r‘
`Wallallll dUSE IEQCIIIEIIIEXIES. ll! 3 IEU USPECUVE Slllldy 01 :1
`population from an anticoagulant clinic,
`the CYPZC9
`alleles associated with decreased enzyme activity (*2 and
`*3) were found to be over~represented in patients
`stabilised on low doses of warfarin. These patients had
`an increase incidence of major and minor haemorrhage.“
`Up to 37% of a British population were carriers of one
`mutant allele (*2 or *3) and were therefore at higher risk
`
`of haemorrhage (table 2). Homozygous carriers of
`mutant alleles of CYPZC9 are rare (O-2 l-0% of the
`population) and this genotype is associated with an even
`higher risk of warfarin adverse drug reactions and with
`severe impairment of the metabolism of tolbutamide,
`glipizide, and phenytoin.°'“’
`
`CamwT
`bone—marrow toxicity (acute leucopenia, anaemia, and
`pancytopenia)
`in patients with thiopurine methyl-
`transferase deficiency treated with standard doses of
`mercaptopurine, thioguanine, and azathioprine is a rare
`(about one in 300) event
`in the treatment of acute
`lymophoblastic leukaemia in children. Patients with this
`purine methyltransferase deficiency can require up to a
`15-fold reduction in mercaptopurine to prevent fatal
`haematotoxicity.5'*2“ Other pharmacogenetic examples
`of adverse drug reactions in cancer chemotherapy are the
`myelosuppression and neurotoxicity of fluorouracil
`in
`patients with
`a
`deficiency
`of dihydropyraiiiidine
`dehydrogenase;
`the myelosuppression and diarrhoea
`after the topoisomerasc I inhibitor irinotecan in patients
`with an inherited deficiency in glucuronidation by a
`promotor
`polymorphism of
`UGT—glucuronosyl—
`transferase UGTlAl; and the greater bone—marrow
`toxicity of the topoisomerase II inhibitor amonafide in
`N—acetyltransferase
`2
`rapid acetylators
`(30—60% of
`whites, 80-90% of Asians)?”
`
`Drug transport
`Several membrane transporters are involved in the
`absorption of drugs into the intestinal
`tract,
`in the
`uptake into the brain and other tissues, or
`in the
`transport into specific sites of action——eg, the synaptic
`cleft. However, little is known about transporter variants
`in relation to drug response. One such variant was
`recently discovered for the multidrug resistance gene
`/VIDRI, which
`codes
`for
`an
`ATP—dependent
`transmembrane efflux pump (l’—glycoprotein), whose
`function is the export of numerous substances including
`drugs from the inside of cells to the outside, protecting
`cells
`from accumulation
`of
`toxic
`substances
`or
`metabolites. A mutation in exon 26 of the ZVIDRI gene
`(C343‘3'l‘) correlated with the expression levels and the
`function
`of
`intestinal
`P—glycoprotein. Thus,
`the
`concentrations of digoxin in plasma were up to four—fold
`higher in individuals homozygous for this mutation after
`a
`single
`oral
`dose
`of digoxin. The maximum
`concentration in plasma (Cm) of digoxin was also
`increased after chronic administration.“ Homozygosity
`forthi variantwa obseLv_edin24"nofaGx:i:n1an
`population.
`Substrates
`of
`P—glycoprotein
`include
`numerous important drugs with narrow therapeutic
`ranges including chemotherapeutic agents, ciclosporin
`A, verapamil, terfenadine, fexofenadin, and most HIV-1
`protease inhibitors. Therefore, this polymorphism could
`have a major impact on the requirement for individual
`dose
`adjustments
`for
`carriers
`of
`this mutation.
`Mutations of other
`transporters, particularly those
`involved in reuptake of serotonin, dopamine, and
`y—aminobutyric acid (GABA) are presently being studied
`with regard to "‘l—l-Iii-Ga-ll-l—}
`relevant changes
`in dru"
`response. Transporter pharmacogenetics is
`a rapidly
`developing field.
`
`Drug targets
`The effects of most drug are exerted via interaction of
`the compound with membrane receptors (about 50% of
`drugs), enzymes (about 30%), or ion channels (about
`
`1670
`
`THE LANCET - Vol 356 - November 11, 2000
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2035 - Page 4
`
`VNDA 02700307
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2035 - Page 4
`
`

`
`ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS
`
`7
`
`9
`
`5%).“ Many of the genes encoding these proteins exhibit
`polymorphisms which may
`alter
`drug
`response.
`Clinically
`relevant
`examples
`are
`summarised
`in
`table 3.3““7 One of the best studied drug receptors is the
`B, adrenergic receptor, and some of its mutations (eg,
`the common mutation Arg—~>Gly at aminoacid 16) are
`major determinants of the |3,—agonist bronchodilator
`response.“ Similarly mutations
`in the
`angiotensin
`converting enzyme (ACE) gene have been proposed to
`account
`for differences
`in the
`response
`to ACE
`inhibitors, but the data from different studies remain
`controversial.“ A combination of two mutations of the
`gene for a high~affinity sulphonylurea receptor lead to a
`40% reduction in the insulin response to tolbutamide”°
`and genetic polymorphisms of the 5—hydroxytryptamine
`(serotonin) receptor HTRZA could be associated with
`the
`response
`to
`clozapine
`in
`patients with
`S:]mZC]D]D]:Em]'S 19
`lflutations in five genes, each encoding structural
`subunits of cardiac ion channels, affect the risk of drug-
`induced long—QT syndrome—a potential
`cause of
`sudden cardiac death in young individuals without
`structural heart disease. The prevalence of long—QT
`syndrome is about one in 10 000. All five genes code for
`membrane ion channels affecting sodium or potassium
`transport and are influenced by antiarrhythmics and
`other drugs."
`
`drug treatment. Tram]: Phaw11aro/ Sci 1999; 20: 3/lr2—/l9.
`5 Evans WE, Relling MV. Pharmacogenomics: translating
`functional genomics into rational therapeutics. .S'cim/my 1999; 286:
`48 7—9 1 .
`6 Roses AD. Pharmacogenetics and future drug development and
`delivery. Lamcet 2000; 355: 1358—61.
`i\/leyer UA, Zanger UM. Molecular mechanisms of genetic
`polymorphisms ofdruv metabolism. Armu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol
`1997; 37: 269—96.
`8 Aithal GP, Day CP, Kesteven P], Daly AK. Association of
`polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 CVPZC9 with warfarin dose
`requirement and risk ofbleeding complications. Lance! 1999; 353:
`71 7—l 9.
`l\/liners ]P, Birkett D]. Cytochrome P4502C9; an enzyme of major
`importance in human drug metabolism. Br} C/in Pharmacal 1998;
`45: 525 38.
`10 Kidd RS, Straughn AB, Meyer NSC, Blaisdell ], Goldstein ]A,
`Dalton ]T. Pharmacokinctics of chlorpheniramine, phenytoin,
`glipizide and nifedipine in an individual homozygous for the
`CYI’2C9*3 allele. Pharmawugenetics 1999; 9: 71—80.
`11 Furuta T, Ohashi K, Kobayashi K, et al. Effects of clarithromycin
`on the metabolism of omeprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotype
`status in humans. Clin Pharmacul Ther 1999; 66: 265—74.
`12 Iyer L, Ratain N1]. Pharmacogenetics and cancer chemotherapy.
`Em‘ j’ Cancz2r'1998, 34: 1493—99.
`13 Gonzalez F], Skoda RC, I\'imura S, et al. Characterization of the
`common genetic defect in humans deficient in debrisoquine
`metabolism. I\z'amre 1988; 331: 442—46.
`14 Raimundo S, Fischer], Eichelbaum ZVI, Griese E—U, Schwab N1,
`Zanger UM. Elucidation of the genetic basis of the common
`“intermediate metabolizer” phenotype for drug oxidation by
`CYPZD6. P/iawriacogeneticc 2000; 10: l—"3.
`15 Brookes A]. The essence of SNPs. Gene 1999; 234: 177—86.
`16 Kalow W/', Tang B—K, Endrenyi L. Hypothesis: contparison of inter-
`Mo;-nook
`and intra-individual variations can substitute for twin studies in drug
`research. Pharmacagerietics 1998; 8: 283—89.
`Tlie systematic identification and functional analysis of
`17 Bertilsson L, Dahl M—L, Tybring G. Pharmacogenetics of
`human genes is
`revolutionising the study of disease
`antidepressants: clinical aspects. /lcza Psycliiatr Scand 1997; 96:
`processes and the development and rational use of
`14—2 1 .
`drugs. It enables physicians to make reliable assessments
`18 Dalen P, Dahl M—L, Bernal Ruiz ML, Nordin ], Bertilsson L.
`of an individuals’ risk of acquiring a particular disease,
`10—liydroxylation of nortiptyline in white persons with 0, 1, 2, 3,
`and 13 functional CYP2D6 genes. Clin Phmmacol Ther 1998; 63:
`raises the number and specificity of drug targets, and
`444—52.
`explains
`interindividual variation of the therapeutic
`19 Sindrup SH, Rrosen K. The pharmacogenetics of codeine
`effectiveness and toxicity of drugs. Mutant alleles at a
`hypoalgesia. P/Iarniacogerzetics 1995; 5: 335—46.
`single gene locus are the best studied individual risk
`20 Lessard E, Yessine M-A, Hamelin BA, O’Hara G, LeBl-anc ],
`factors for adverse drug reactions, including the genes
`Turgeon
`Influence of CYP2D6 activity on the disposition and
`cardiovascular toxicity of the antidepressant agent venlafaxine in
` ,
`humans. P/1arm.zcogc11czi¢:s 1999; 9: 435 43.
`dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and the cytochrome
`21 Chou WVH, Yan F-X, De Leon ], et al. Extension of a pilot study:
`P450 enzymes. Genotyping can predict the extremes of
`impact of the cytochrome P450 ZD6 polymorphism on outcome and
`phenotypes in these situations. However, less definable
`costs associated with severe mental illness. ] czm P53/clioplwrnzauol
`pharmacogenetic factors produce a phenotype together
`2000; 20: 246—5l.
`22 Weinshilboum RlVl, Otterness DM, Szumlanski CL. Metliylation
`with other variant genes and with environmental factors
`pharmacogenetics: catecliol O-methyltransferase, thiopurine
`(eg, smoking, diet, &c). Genomics is providing the
`methyltransferase, and histamine N—methytransferase. Annu Rev
`information and technology to analyse these complex
`Plmrmacal Toxicol 1999; 39: 19—52.
`multifaetorial
`situations
`and to
`obtain individual
`23 Hoffmeyer S, Burk 0, Von Richter O, et al. Functional
`genotypic information. Awareness of inherited variations
`pOlyD10Ipl]lSlTlS ofthe huntan multidrug-resistance gene: multiple
`sequence variations and correlation of one allele with P—glyL;oprolein
`of drug responsiveness, which are constant throughout
`life,—can lead tl“)—&(T§E 8fifu. ,‘§4%%,97.
`3473—78.
`patient’s genetic makeup and are likely to prevent
`24 Drews ], Ryser S. The role ofinnovation in drug development. Nat
`adverse drug reactions.
`Biozec1moZl997;15: 1318—l9.
`25 Ligget SE. The pharmacogenetics ofbeta2—adrenergic receptors:
`relevance to asthma. _7'AZlergj/ Clirz Immmzol 2000; 105: 487—92.
`26 Hansen T, Echwald SM, Hansen L, et al. Decreased tolbutamidc—
`stimulated insulin secretion in healthy subjects with sequence
`variants in the high-affinity sulfonyurea receptor gene. Diabctes 1998;
`47: 598 605.
`27 Priori SG, Barhanin ], Hauer RN, et al. Genetic and molecular basis
`of cardiac arrhythmias: impact on clinical management parts I and
`I1‘. Czrculazzrm I999; 99: 5 ] 8—2H.
`28—Na is , dc , dt ]-on-g-PE. i-
`converting enzyme gene l/1) polymorphism and renal disease. ff [Mal
`.Med 1999; 77: 781—91.
`29 Arranz M], Munro], Sham P, et al. Meta-analysis of studies on
`genetic variation in 5—HT2A receptors and clozapine response.
`Schz’z0pIzrRe5 1998; 32: 93—99.
`
`'lhis study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation.
`
`References
`l Lazarou ], Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug
`reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective
`studies.,7A}\/IA 1998; 279: 1200—O5.
`2 Meyer UA. Genotype or phenotype: the definition of a
`pharmacogenetic polymorphism. Pharmacogenetics 1991; 1: 66—67.
`3 Meyer U731. Drugs in special patient groups: clinical importance ot
`genomics in drug effects. In: Carruthers GS, Hoffmann BR,
`Melmon KL, Nierenberg DW/, eds. New York: McGrawI Iill, 2000:
`1 179—205.
`Ingelman—Sundberg N1, Oscarson M, McLellan RA. Polymorphic
`human cytochrome P450 enzymes; an opportunity for individualized
`
`4
`
`THE LANCET - Vol 356 - November 11, 2000
`
`1671
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2035 - Page 5
`
`VNDA 02700308
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2035 - Page 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket