throbber
CLINICAL I’I-IARIVIACOLOGY Sc 'I‘l"Il:LRAPEUTICS
`VOLUME 73, NUMBER2
`
`American Societyfor Clinical I’/{mu/macology m/wl Therapeuticr P77
`
`This article is protected by copyright and is provided by the University of Wisconsin-
`Madison under license from John Wiley & Sons. All rights reserved.
`
`PIII—55
` C¥P"7D6—B¥ EARQX
`
`ETINE.
`I{_.l,\/l_._Bertelsen K. Venkatakrishnan, L.L. von Moltke, R.
`Scott Obach, and D.J. Greenblatt. Tufts University, Boston, MA and
`Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT.
`The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine (PX) is a
`potent CYP2D6 inhibitor, but the mechanism of inhibition is not
`established. Inhibition of CYP2D6 in vitro by PX, fluoxetinc (FLU)
`and quinidine (Q) was studied in human liver mierosomes (HLM)
`using dextromethorphan O—demethylati0n (25 uM) as the index re-
`action. Without preincubation of HLM with inhibitor, mean IC50
`values were: 2.5 i.LM for PX, 0.2 p.M for FLU, and 0.23 i.tM for Q.
`Preincubation of inhibitor with l-ILM significantly reduced the PX
`IC5n by eight-fold to 0.3 p.M; in contrast, the IC50 for FLU and Q
`were actually increased (to 0.42 uM and 0.36 p.M, respectively). PX
`produced time—dependent inactivation, with an apparent rate constant
`of 0.17/min based on a Kitz—Wilson plot. This was not true for FLU
`or Q. Incubation of PX with recombinant CYP2D6 yielded a differ-
`ence spectrum with maximum absorbance at 456 nm, and a time
`dependent increase in absorbance, consistent with inactivation via
`formation of a carbene-heme complex. Thus PX, unlike FLU and Q,
`appears to inhibit CYP2D6 at least in part through a mechanism-
`based process, probably attributable to the methylenedioxy substitu-
`ent of PX.
`
`PIII-56
`PHARMACOGENOMIC STUDIES USING PARAFFIN EM—
`
`BEDDED TUMOR SAMPLES,
`J. M. Rae PhD 1. Scheys, BS,
`K. E. Cordero, BS, M. D. Johnson, PhD, University of Michigan,
`Georgetown University, Ann Arbor, MI.
`Paraffin embedded tumor samples are valuable in the study of
`cancer. Besides use in routine staging and marker analysis, they are
`used to test new prognostic and predictive markers. However, their
`use in retrospective pharrnacogenomic analysis of clinical trials has
`yet to be evaluated. We set out to establish genotyping methods for
`polymorphic CYP450s in forma1in—fixed archival tumor samples and
`determine if fixation, processing or somatic changes in the tumor
`affect our ability to determine germ—line mutations. To establish the
`assay, paraffin blocks were made from 8 cell lines. DNA from cell
`cultures and paraffin sections was purified using the Qiagen system.
`These samples were genotyped for CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2Cl9
`and CYP2D6 alleles using PCR—Rl-‘LP. "his allowed optimization of
`DNA extraction and genotyping for these materials and showed that
`fixation and processing did not significantly alter the genotypes
`‘
`ll, .......'
`.
`.. s_
`
`
`
`
`sections were cut from archival tumor blocks from l0 patients for
`whom gDNA from peripheral blood was available. Again, concor-
`dance was very high with the same genotype being obtained for 97%
`of the alleles tested. Conclusions: accurate genetic testing for poly-
`morphisms on CYP2Cs and CYP2D6 can be obtained from archival
`paraffin embedded tumor samples. Thus, pharmacogenetie analysis
`can be applied to existing cancer therapy trials to test associations
`between these polymorphisms and treatment response.
`
`PIII-57
`sm
`FUNCTIONAL 5 ’—FLANKING REGION (5’-FR) POLYMOR—
`
`PHISMS.
`J. Prondzinski B. Thomae, L. Wang, B. Eckloff, E.
`Wieben, PhD, R. Weinshilboum, MD, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Graduate
`School—Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
`SULTlAl catalyzes the sulfate conjugation of many drugs. xeno-
`biotics and hormones. Human platelet SULTlAl activity and thermal
`stability vary widely among individuals and are regulated by inher-
`itance. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the SULTIAI
`open reading frame (ORF) (Arg2l3His) is associated with low levels
`of enzyme activity and thermal stability. However, not all SULTlAl
`phenotypic variation is explained by this SNP. We set out to deter-
`mine whether polymorphisms in the 5’—FR also influence SULTlAl
`expression. We resequeneed 2 kb of the SULT1A1 5’—FR using 32
`DNA samples selected for extreme platelet activity and thermal
`stability. Three common SNPs were observed (—l985 C/G, -624 C/G,
`-397 G/A — nuinbered relative to the “A” in the ATG codon). The
`—624 and -397 SNPs were associated with SULTIAI ORF genotype
`and with platelet SULTlAl phenotype. Luciferase reporter gene
`constructs containing these SNPs were used to transfect HepG2 cells.
`There was a 59% average decrease in activity (N=9) for the construct
`containing (-624, -397) GA as compared with CG, and a 90.5%
`average decrease in activity (N=9) for a shorter construct that con-
`tained only (-397) A vs. G. These results indicate that 5'—FR genetic
`polymorphisms may contribute to SULTlAl pharmacogenetic vari~
`ation and that inherited variation in the regulation of transcription
`could influence sulfate conjugation catalyzed by this isoform.
`
`PIII-58
`INFLUENCE OF CYP2D6 GENOTYPE ON THE QTc INTER-
`VAL AND PLASMA CONCENTRATIONS OF THIORIDAZINE
`AND ITS METABOLITES IN PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS TAK-
`ING CHRONIC THERAPY. R. Thanacoody, MRCP, A. K. Daly,
`PhD, S. H. Thomas, MD, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, United
`Kingdom (Great Britain).
`Purpose. The antipsychotic agent thioridazine is an important
`cause of QTC interval prolongation and torsade de pointes and
`CYP2D6 is important in its metabolism. This study was performed to
`determine whether CYP2D6 genotype influences the QTc interval in
`long—term recipients of thioridazine.
`Methods: Patients receiving stable doses of thioridazine were
`recruited from psychiatric hospitals and clinics. A I2—lead ECG was
`recorded and the QTe interval measured using a digitiser. CYP2D6
`
`
`
`with absence of activity (*3, *4, *5 and *6). When available, plasma
`was analysed for concentrations of thioridazine and its metabolites,
`thioridazine—2—sulfoxide (T—2SO),
`thioridazine—2—sulfone (T—SO2),
`and thioridazine—5-sulfoxide (T-5SO) using high performance liquid
`chromatography.
`the 93 patients studied in-
`Results: Genotyping indicated that
`cluded 54 extensive metabolizers (EM), 30 intermediate metabolizers
`(IM. heterozygotes with 1 mutant allele) and 9 poor metabolizers
`(PM, 2 mutant alleles). The mean doses of thioridazine talcen in the
`previous 24 h (104 i122, ll3 i 86, and ll5:t I85 mg respectively)
`and mean Q'l‘e intervals (425 i 29 427 i 22 41 l i 4] ms
`respectively) were similar for the 3 groups. For the 30 subjects for
`whom data were available, QTc intervals were significantly corrc~
`lated with plasma concentrations of thioridazine, T—2SO and T«SO2
`but not T—5SO. Mean thioridazine and metabolite concentrations did
`not differ significantly between EM, IM and PM subjects, although
`the numbers involved were small (l5, l2 and 3 respectively).
`Conclusions: This study does not suggest that CYPZD6 genotype
`substantially affects risk of thioridazine induced QTC prolongation.
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2028 - Page 1
`
`VNDA 02699850
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2028 - Page 1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket