throbber
OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
`THE JOURNAL
`0 1986 by The American Society of Biological Chemists, Inc.
`
`Val. 261, No. 11, Issue of April 15, pp. 5051-5060,1986
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Characterization of Rat and Human Liver Microsomal Cytochrome
`P-450 Forms Involved in Nifedipine Oxidation, a Prototype for
`Genetic Polymorphism in Oxidative Drug Metabolism*
`
`(Received for publication, July 25, 1985)
`
`F. Peter GuengerichSS, Martha V. Martin$, Philippe H. BeauneTi, Pierre Kremers(1, Thomas Wolffc*,
`and David J. Waxman$$
`From the $Department of Biochemistry and Center in Molecular Toxicology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine,
`Nashville, Tennessee 37232, Wnstitut National de la Sant4 et de la Recherche Medicale U 75, CHU Necker, F75730 Paris Cedex
`15, France, IlLaboratoire de Chimie Medicale B23 Sart-Tilrnan, Liege-I, Belgium, **Gesellschaff fur Strahlen- und
`Umweltforschung-Mu~hen, Znstitut fur Toxikologie, 0-8042 Neuherberg, Federal Republic of Germany, and the $$Department
`of Biological Chemistry and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Haruard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 021 15
`
`The metabolism of the dihydropyridine calcium an-
`tagonist and vasodilator nifedipine has been reported
`to exhibit polymorphism among individual humans
`(Kleinbloesem, C. H., van Brummelen, P., Faber, H.,
`Danhof, M., Vermeulen, N. P. E., and Breimer, D. D.
`(1984) Biochem. Pharmacol. 33, 3721-3724). Nife-
`dipine oxidation has been shown to be catalyzed by
`cytochrome P-450 (P-450) enzymes. Reconstitution,
`immunoinhibition, and induction studies with rat liver
`indicated that the forms designated P - 4 5 0 ” ~ . ~ and P-
`~ ~ O P C N - E are the major contributors to microsomal
`nifedipine oxidation. The P-450 which oxidizes nife-
`dipine (P-45oNF) was purified to electrophoretic ho-
`mogeneity from several human liver samples. Antibod-
`ies raised to P-45oNF were highly specific as judged by
`immunoblotting analysis and inhibited >90% of the
`nifedipine oxidase activity in human liver microsomes.
`A ’monoclonal antibody raised to the
`human P-450
`
`preparation reacted with both human P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ and rat
`P’450pCN-E. Immunoblotting andysis of 39 human liver
`microsomal samples using anti-P-460NF antibodies re-
`vealed the same 52,000-dalton
`polypeptide, corre-
`sponding to P-450m, with only one of the microsomal
`samples showing an additional immunoreactive pro-
`tein. The level of nifedipine oxidase activity was highly
`correlated with the amount of P-450N~ thus detected
`using either polyclonal (r = 0.78) or monoclonal ( r =
`0.65) antibodies, suggesting that the amount of the P-
`450NF polypeptide may be a major factor in influencing
`the level of catalytic activity in humans as well as rats.
`Cytochrome b6 enhanced the catalytic activity of re-
`constituted P-450NF, and anti-cytochrome b5 inhibited
`nifedipine oxidase activity in human liver microsomes.
`P-450Np also appears to be a major contributor to hu-
`man liver microsomal aldrin epoxidation, d-benzphet-
`amine N-demethylation, 17fl-estradiol 2- and
`4-hy-
`droxylation, and testosterone GB-hydroxylation, the
`major pathway for oxidation of this androgen in human
`liver microsomes.
`
`the oxidative metabolism of
`Interindividual variations in
`* This research was supported in part by Grants CA 30907 and ES
`00267 from the National Institutes of Health (F. P. G.) and BC-462
`from the American Cancer Society (D. J. W.). The costs of publication
`of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges.
`This article must
`therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`5 Burroughs Wellcome Scholar in Toxicology (1983-1988). T o
`whom correspondence should be addressed.
`
`drugs have been recognized and are probably due at least in
`part to polymorphisms in the cytochrome P-450’ enzymes
`(Kupfer and Preisig, 1984; Guengerich et al., 1986). These
`polymorphisms usually contain a strong genetic component
`and, in addition to predisposing individuals to potential drug
`toxicities, may also contribute to the influence of host factors
`in carcinogenesis, as the P-450s are involved in the biotrans-
`formation of a variety of environmental pollutants, pesticides,
`and cancer-causing agents as well as drugs (Wislocki et al.,
`1980). Such polymorphisms have been characterized in animal
`models (Simmons and Kasper, 1983; Larrey et al., 1984;
`Johnson and Schwab, 1984) but only recently have the mo-
`lecular details been considered in humans. We have recently
`purified human P-450s involved in three of these polymor-
`phisms, namely debrisoquine 4-hydroxylation, phenacetin 0-
`deethylation, and mephenytoin 4-hydroxylation (Distlerath
`et at., 1985; Guengerich et al., 1986; Shimada et at., 1986). In
`each of these polymorphisms about 5% of the individuals in
`Caucasian populations are phenotyically deficient in activity,
`although the fraction varies with race (Kalow, 1984).
`Recently Kleinbloesem et al. (1984) identified an apparently
`bimodal variation in the metabolism of the vasodilator and
`calcium agonist nifedipine. In that study 17% of the individ-
`uals examined were phenotypically deficient in the first step
`
`The abbreviations used are: P-450, liver microsomal cytochrome
`P-45% NaDodSO,, sodium dodecyl sulfate; IgG, immunoglobulin G
`CHAPS, 3-[ (3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio] -1-propanesul-
`fonate; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatogaphy. The termi-
`nology “HL” i s used here to denote human liver microsomal prepa-
`rations, which are identified by code number. The nomenclature used
`for the rat P-450 isozyme and comparison to preparations of others
`has been made elsewhere (Guengerich et al., 1982a; Waxman et al.,
`
`1985). Of particular note here, P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ . ~ (Guengerich et al., 1982a)
`appears to correspond to preparations designated “male-specific P-
`450” (Kamataki et al., 1983), “RLM 5” (Cheng and Schenkman,
`1982), “P-450 2c” (Waxman et al., 1983; Waxman, 19841, “h” (Haniu
`et al., 1984), and “P-450 A” (LeProvost et al., 1983). P-450PCN.E
`(Guengerich et al., 1982a, 198213) appears to correspond to other
`preparations designated ‘‘P-45OPCN’’ (Elshourbagy and Guzelian,
`1980) and “PB-2a” (Waxman, 1984). In some cases where experi-
`ments in this report were done with preparations of these P-450s
`made in Dr. Waxman’s laboratory, a combined designation is used
`(e.g. P-450PCN-E(PB.2a)). The human P-450s are designated P-450NF
`
`
`(this report), P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ (Distlerath et al., 1985), P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ (Distlerath et
`
`al., 1985), and P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ (Guengerich et al., 1986) to signify their
`respective involvements in the genetic polymorphisms of nifedipine
`oxidation (NF), debrisoquine 4-hydroxylation (DB), phenacetin 0-
`deethylation (PA), and S-mephenytoin-4-hydroxylation (MP) activ-
`ities.
`
`5051
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2007 - Page 1
`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`

`
`5052
`
`P-450 Nifedipine Oxidase
`
`TABLE IV
`NifediDine oxidase activities of rat liver microsomes
`
`Sex of
`rats
`
`Treatment of rats
`
`0.25
`
`Phenobarbital 0.46
`
`
`
`
`Phenobarbital
`P-Naphthoflavone
`Isosafrole
`
`Aroclor
`
`3.79
`
`
`
`Female
`Female
`Male
`Male
`Male
`Male
`1254
`Male
`Male
`Male
`
`Nifedipine oxidase activity
`
`nmol product
`formedjminjmg
`microsomal protein
`0.25
`1.63
`5.34
`13.2
`1.80
`7.96
`
`nmol product
`formed/min/
`nmol P-450
`
`5.51
`3.91
`1.60
`
`1.65 (+ 0.21) 2.71
`
`2.34 (+ 0.57)
`
`(+ 0.35)
`2.52 (+ 0.61)
`
`Experiment I“
`
`1.76
`
`
`
`8.03
`
`Experiment IIb
`
`Pregnenolone 16a-car-
`bonitrile
`Dexamethasone
`(+ 1.05)
`4.16 (+ 0.98) 4.24
`
`
`Male
`(+ 0.45)
`Triacetvloleandomvcin
`2.28 (& 0.32) 3.25
`
`
`Male
`~~ ’ Results are expressed as means of duplicate assays.
`* Results are expressed as means (+ S.D.) of triplicate assays. In these studies the rats weighed only 75-100 g,
`and the lower catalytic activity (compared to Experiment I) is attributed to lack of development of P-45Om.~
`(Waxman et al., 1985).
`
`of metabolism, the formal 2-electron oxidation of the nifedi-
`pine dihydropyridine ring (Scheme 1). Such an oxidation
`could in principle be catalyzed by a number of different
`oxidoreductases, but some precedent exists for the involve-
`ment of P-450s (August0 et al., 1982). The primary metabolite
`is further transformed by saponification of the ester and
`hydroxylation of the ring methyls (Raemsch and Sommer,
`1983).
`In this report we identify the P-450 forms in rat liver which
`are responsible for nifedipine oxidation. The human liver P-
`450 involved in this activity has also been identified, purified
`to apparent homogeneity, and partially characterized with
`regard to its role in the interindividual variation. Preliminary
`reports of these findings have been presented in abstract form
`(Guengerich et al., 1985).
`
`EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES AND RESULTS~
`Nifedipine Oxidase Activity in Rat Liver Microsomes-In
`order to define which rat P-450s contribute to microsomal
`nifedipine oxidation, the effects of sex and monooxygenase
`induction agents on rat liver microsomal nifedipine metabo-
`lism were examined (Table IV). Microsomes prepared from
`untreated males oxidized nifedipine 20-fold faster than did
`those prepared from untreated females. On a per mg protein
`basis, the activity could be increased by treatment with phen-
`
`CH,OOC
`
`COOCH, “b C . ; O O C ~ C O O C H .
`
`H
`SCHEME 1. Oxidation of nifedipine to its pyridine metabolite.
`
`CH, N’
`
`CH,
`
`Portions of this paper (including “Experimental Procedures,” part
`of “Results,” Tables 1-111, Figs. 1-9, and Footnotes 3-6) are presented
`in miniprint at the end of this paper. Miniprint is easily read with
`the aid of a standard magnifying glass. Full size photocopies are
`available from the Journal of Biological Chemistry, 9650 Rockville
`Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814. Request Document No. 85M-2478, cite
`the authors, and include a check or money order for $11.60 per set of
`photocopies. Full size photocopies are also included in the microfilm
`edition of the Journal that is available from Waverly Press.
`
`obarbital in either sex or with isosafrole or the polychlorinated
`biphenyl mixture Aroclor 1254. Administration of p-na-
`phthoflavone (which both induces P-450i(NF.B and P-45OIsp.~
`and suppresses the male-specific P-45oUT.A (Guengerich et al.,
`1982a)) decreased nifedipine oxidase activity. Pregnenolone
`16a-carbonitrile, dexamethasone, and triacetyloleandomycin,
`which all induce P-450P~~.E, all elevated nifedipine oxidase
`activity (Table IV, Experiment 11). Of the phenobarbital-
`inducible P-450s, only P-450pCN.E is male specific in untreated
`rats (Waxman et al., 1985).
`Catalytic Activities of Purified Rat P-450 Isozymes-Ten
`different purified rat P-450s were assayed for nifedipine oxi-
`dase activity after reconstitution with rat NADPH-P-450
`reductase and phospholipid (Table v). P-45o”T.A clearly ex-
`hibited the highest catalytic activity but P-450pCN.E and P-
`450pB.B also had some activity. P-450pCN.E, apparently alone
`among the rat P-450s studied to date,
`is known to lose
`catalytic activity during purification (Elshourbagy and Guz-
`elian, 1980; Guengerich et al., 1982a; Shimada and Guenger-
`ich, 1985; Waxman et al., 1985).
`Immunochemical Inhibition of Catalytic Activity in Liver
`Microsomes-The studies with microsomes and reconstituted
`P-450 systems described above suggested that P-~~OIJT-A, P-
`
`4 5 0 p ~ ~ . ~ , and P-450pB.B might be the major forms of P-450
`contributing to nifedipine oxidation in rat liver. In order to
`examine the roles of these enzymes more closely, inhibitory
`antibodies specific for each of these P-450s were incubated
`with microsomes prepared from untreated male rats (Fig. 10).
`Both anti-P-450uT.A and anti-P-450pcN.E showed extensive
`inhibition, but
`anti-P-450pB.n did not. Moreover, anti-P-
`450pB.B did not inhibit nifedipine oxidase activity in liver
`microsomes prepared from phenobarbital-treated adult female
`rats (which contain P-450PCN-E and P-450pB.B but not P-
`450UT.A (Waxman et al., 1985)) (data not shown).
`Purification, Properties, and Reconstitution of Human Liver
`P-450NF”P-45oNF was isolated from several human liver sam-
`ples as described in the Miniprint using a high performance
`liquid chromatography assay to monitor nifedipine oxidase
`activity. Also detailed in the Miniprint are the electrophoretic,
`spectral, and immunochemical properties of P-450N~ and
`studies on its catalytic specificity.
`Anti-P-450~~ was found to almost completely inhibit nife-
`dipine oxidation in human liver microsomes (Fig. 11). Anti-
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2007 - Page 2
`
`

`
`P-450 Nifedipine Oxidase
`
`5053
`
`TABLE V
`Nifedipine oxidase activities of purified rat P-450 preparations
`Nifedipine oxidase activity
`P-450 isozyme
`nmol product formed/min/nmol P-450
`3.5
`0.39
`0.15
`<0.03
`0.15
`0.66
`0.06
`<0.03
`0.13
`<0.03
`
`n
`
`pre-immune
`
`
`
`o /
`0
`
`I
`5
`
`I
`10
`
`I
`15
`
`I
`20
`
`I
`
`mg IgG/nrnol MICROSOMAL P - 4 5 0
`FIG. 11. Immunoinhibition of human liver microsomal ni-
`fedipine oxidase activity. Human liver microsomes (sample HL92)
`were assayed for nifedipine oxidase activity after preincubation with
`IgG fractions prepared from rabbit preimmune sera (O), anti-rat P-
`~ ~ O U T - A (V), anti-rat P"i50PCN.E (m), or P-45oNF (0). The IgG prepa-
`rations were the same used in Fig. 10. Incubations contained 50 pmol
`of microsomal P-450, and the
`incubation time was 10 min. The
`uninhibited activity was 6.7 nmol of product formed/min/nmol of P-
`450. The indicated points represent means of duplicate experiments.
`Similar patterns of inhibition with anti-P-450NF have been observed
`in several other human
`liver microsomal preparations (data not
`shown).
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`0
`k
`w
`n
`
`0 1
`
`I
`
`I
`10
`
`anti-P-450
`
`f
`PCN-E
`
`J
`
`30
`
`I
`25
`
`
`l
` 5
`o
`I
`I
`15
`20
`m g I g G / n m o i MICROSOMAL P-450
`FIG. 10. Immunoinhibition of rat liver microsomal nifedi-
`pine oxidase activity. Liver microsomes prepared from untreated
`male rats were assayed for nifedipine oxidase activity after preincu-
`bation with IgG fractions prepared from rabbit anti-P-450pe.~ (O),
`(m). Preimmune IgG was added
`(V), or anti-P-450pc~.~
`a n t i - P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ . ~
`to each incubate to give a total IgG level of 25 mg/nmol P-450 in
`each case. Incubations contained 52 pmol of microsomal P-450, and
`the incubation time was 15 min. The uninhibited activity was 4.4
`nmol of product formed/min/nmol of P-450. The indicated points
`represent means of duplicate experiments.
`
`P-450PCN-E was
`rat P-450uT.A did not inhibit, but anti-rat
`somewhat inhibitory in human as well as rat liver microsomes
`(Fig. 11).
`Role of Cytochrome b5 in Human Microsomal Nifedipine
`Oxidase Activity-Preliminary studies indicated that the in-
`clusion of either purified rat or human liver cytochrome b5 in
`the reconstituted P-45oNF resulted in a variable enhancement
`of nifedipine oxidase activity. The influence of cytochrome b5
`on three distinct purified P-45oNF preparations was, therefore,
`examined in greater detail (Fig. 12). While a positive effect
`was observed with each P-450NF preparation, the extent of
`stimulation and the amount of cytochrome b5 required for the
`maximal effect were rather variable.
`In order to gain more insight into the role of cytochrome
`b5, antibodies were raised against purified cytochrome b5 iso-
`lated from liver sample HL91. The antibodies recognized a
`single polypeptide in each of three human microsomal prep-
`arations as demonstrated
`by immunoblotting analysis and
`also inhibited cytochrome b5-dependent (Omura and Takesue,
`1970) NADH-cytochrome-c reductase activity in human liver
`microsomes. Although the inhibition of microsomal nifedipine
`oxidase activity required large amounts of anti-cytochrome b5
`IgG, parallel inhibition of cytochrome b5-dependent NADH-
`cytochrome c reduction was evident (Fig. 13).
`
`!
`
`I
`
`I
`30C
`
`!
`I
`!
`100
`200
`pmol CYTOCHROME p,
`FIG. 12. Enhancement of nifedipine oxidase activity of pu-
`rified human P - 4 5 0 ~ ~
`by human liver cytochrome bs. Recon-
`stituted systems containing 50 pmol of P-45oNF isolated from liver
`sample HL37 (0), HL92 (O), or HL93 (A), 250 pmol of rabbit
`NADPH-P-450 reductase, and 15 nmol of L-a-1,z-dilauroyl-sn-gly-
`cero-3-phosphocholine were fortified with the indicated amounts of
`purified human liver cytochrome b, (added as a 1 ~ L M solution 30 min
`after mixing the previous components at 23 "C). After 10 min, other
`reaction components were added (total volume, 0.5 ml), and the
`reactions were incubated for 5 min.
`
`Correlation of Nifedipine Oxidase Activity with Immuno-
`
`chemically Determined Concentrations of P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ " T h e levels
`of nifedipine oxidase activity in individual human liver mi-
`crosomal preparations were compared to the immunochemi-
`(Fig. 14). When the compar-
`cally estimated levels of P - 4 5 0 ~ ~
`ison was made using rabbit anti-P-450NF, the correlation was
`highly significant (r = 0.78, n = 32, p < 0.005). When a similar
`comparison was made using a monoclonal antibody raised to
`human liver P-4505 (Wang et al., 1983; Beaune et al., 1985),
`the correlation was only slightly less significant (r = 0.65, n
`= 39, p < 0.005).
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2007 - Page 3
`
`

`
`5054
`
`P-450 Nifedipine Oxidase
`
`O
`
`I
`40
`
`I
`
`1
`80
`
`I
`
`120
`
`DISCUSSION
`In this report we have identified and characterized the P-
`450 isozymes involved in the oxidation of the drug nifedipine.
`Two rat P-450s, designated as P-45oUT.A and P-450pCN.E, were
`identified as having significant roles in the reaction. The
`human liver enzyme active in nifedipine oxidation, designated
`P-45oNF, was purified on the basis of catalytic activity and
`found to be apparently indistinguishable from several prepa-
`rations of human liver P-450 which had previously been
`isolated in this laboratory (Wang et al., 1983). Immunochem-
`ical inhibition studies strongly suggest that this enzyme is
`responsible for most of the primary oxidation of nifedipine,
`with the immunochemically determined levels of P-45oNF
`being well correlated with nifedipine oxidase activity in hu-
`man liver microsomes.
`In rats, evidence for the roles of P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ . * and P-450pCN.E
`in nifedipine oxidation comes from both reconstitution and
`immunoinhibition studies. The 20-fold sex difference in un-
`treated rats is consistent with the demonstration that in adult
`animals both of the isozymes mentioned are male specific
`(Waxman et al., 1985). P-450pCN.E can be induced in males or
`females with pregnenolone 16a-carbonitrile, phenobarbital,
`dexamethasone, isosafrole, or triacetyloleandomycin (Guen-
`gerich et al., 1982a; Heuman et al., 1982; Wrighton et al., 1985;
`Waxman et al., 1985). P-45OUT.* levels are decreased by the
`above compounds and particularly by P-naphthoflavone and
`other chemicals which induce P-450ONF.B (Dannan et al., 1983;
`Waxman, 1984). The rat P-450pCN.E activity may have some
`relevance to the human situation, but caution is advised; the
`P-450uT.A activity is probably not useful in making compari-
`sons to humans.
`In humans evidence for the role of P-45oNF in nifedipine
`oxidation comes from reconstitution and
`immunochemical
`inhibition studies. The correlation between catalytic activity
`and P-45oNF levels also supports this conclusion. The question
`arises as to the identity and number of P-450s in humans
`which cross-react immunochemically with P-45oNF. Anti-P-
`450m reacted with a minor protein(s) which was resolved
`using DEAE-cellulose but did not exhibit nifedipine oxidase
`activity (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, in previous work human liver
`P--450 NF, n m o l / m g protein
`P-450s that appeared to be immunochemically similar to each
`FIG. 14. Correlation of nifedipine oxidase activity with im-
`other could be separated chromatographically (Wang et al.,
`munochemically determined P-45ONP in human liver micro-
`1983). Recently Watkins et al. (1985) isolated a P-450 from
`somes. Microsomal samples prepared from 32 individual livers were
`human liver on the basis of its strong cross-reactivity with
`assayed for nifedipine oxidase activity (using 50 pmol of total P-450,
`what appears to be rat P-450pCN.E or a homolog (catalytic
`incubation time 10 min, substrate concentration, 0.20 mM) and for
`activity was not reported). At this point we do not know the
`P-45oNF using immunoblotting: 10 pg of microsomal protein were
`electrophoresed in each well along with 0.1 pg of equine liver alcohol
`
`extent of microheterogeneity in the structure of P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ and
`dehydrogenase (Steward et al., 1985). Each gel also contained lanes
`related enzymes. The possibility certainly exists that this is a
`with 0.4, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0 pmol of purified P-45oNF (from sample
`multigene family, but no further evidence is available.
`HL92) and the same amount of alcohol dehydrogenase. The nitrocel-
`Human P-45oNF appears to share immunochemical homol-
`lulose sheets were treated with a 1:lOO dilution of rabbit anti-P-450~~
`ogy (Figs. 6 and 11) as well as catalytic activity with rat P-
`(and a 1500 dilution of anti-alcohol dehydrogenase), and amounts of
`P-45oNF were estimated using the ratio of peaks (obtained after
`450PCN.E, insofar as P-450pCN.E contributes partially to nife-
`
`densitometry) of P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ and alcohol dehydrogenase (Steward et al.,
`dipine oxidation in rat liver microsomes. The regulation of P-
`1985). The line through the points was drawn using linear regression
`450NF and P-450pCN-E is, however, quite distinct. Thus, P-
`analysis.
`450PCN.E is a male-specific enzyme in untreated adult rats,
`although present in young rats of both sexes before puberty.
`Neonatal gonadectomy and hormone replacement can be used
`to alter the patterns of P-450pCN-E expression in rats, as can
`xenobiotic administration (Waxman et al., 1985). In humans
`no sex or age dependence of nifedipine metabolism has been
`observed (Kleinbloesem et al., 1984). Interestingly, the liver
`sample which had the highest levels of both nifedipine oxidase
`activity and immunochemically detectable P-45oNF (detected
`with both rabbit anti-P-450NF and the monoclonal antibody)
`(Fig. 14) was obtained from a patient who had been adminis-
`
`b 5
`rng ANTI-CYTOCHROME b5/nrnol CYTOCHROME
`FIG. 13. Immunoinhibition of human liver microsomal ni-
`fedipine oxidase activity by anti-human liver cytochrome b5.
`Human liver microsomes (sample HL92) were assayed for NADH-
`cytochrome c reductase activity (0) and nifedipine oxidase activity
`(V) after 60 min of preincubation at 23 "C with the indicated amount
`of the IgG fraction of rabbit-anti-human liver cytochrome b,. The
`mixtures were adjusted with the IgG fraction from preimmune anti-
`serum such that all contained 110 mg of total IgG/nmol of microsomal
`b,. The indicated points represent means of duplicate experiments.
`
`Since a role for cytochrome b5 in nifedipine oxidase activity
`could also be demonstrated (uide supra), we also considered
`the effects of variation of this enzyme as well. Among 20
`individual samples examined the specific content of cyto-
`chrome b5 (estimated spectrally) varied from 0.25-1.19 nmol
`(mg protein)" (mean 0.82 f 0.24 (S.D.)). When nifedipine
`oxidase activity was compared to the amount of cytochrome
`b5 in these samples, the r value was only 0.25 (not significant,
`p > 0.10).
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2007 - Page 4
`
`

`
`5055
`
`P-450 Nifedipine Oxidase
`Kaminsky, L. S. (1982a) Biochemistry 21, 6019-6030
`tered de~amethasone.~ This observation suggests that the
`Guengerich, F. P., Wang, P., and Davidson, N. K. (1982b) Biochem-
`enzyme may be inducible (e.g. by glucocorticoids), but com-
`istu 21,1698-1706
`parison with the liver before treatment is not possible and
`Guengerich, F. P., Shimada, T., and Martin, M. V. (1985) Fed. Proc.
`conclusions regarding “induction” should be considered hy-
`44,1467
`pothetical. The correlation between nifedipine oxidase activ-
`Guengerich, F. P., Distlerath, L. M., Reilly, P. E. B., Wolff, T.,
`Shimada, T., Umbenhauer, D. R., and Martin, M. V. (1986) Xe-
`ity and the immunochemically determined levels of P - 4 5 0 ~ ~
`nobiotica, in press
`suggests that the amount of the enzyme may be important in
`Haniu, M., Ryan, D. E., Iida, S., Lieber, C. S., Levin, W., and Shively,
`determining the catalytic activity. If this is the case, then the
`J. E. (1984) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 235,304-311
`locus in determining whether a person is a phenotypic defi-
`Heuman, D. M., Gallagher, E. J., Banvick, J. C., Elshourbagy, N.,
`cient metabolizer may be at the level of factors involved in
`and Guzelian, P. S. (1982) Mol. Pharrnacol. 21, 753-760
`transcription rather than the structural gene. Further exper-
`Johnson, E. F., and Schwab, G. E. (1984) Xenobiotica 14,3-18
`imentation will be required to address these hypotheses, but
`Kalow, W. (1984) Fed. Proc. 43, 2326-2331
`Kamataki, T., Maeda, K., Yamazoe, Y., Nagai, T., and Kato, R.
`we feel that we have established a basis for such studies.
`(1983) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 225, 758-770
`Various correlation, reconstitution, and immunochemical
`Kaminsky, L. S., and Guengerich, F. P. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 149,
`inhibition data support
`
`the view that P - 4 5 0 ~ ~ is a major
`479-489
`enzyme involved in human liver nifedipine oxidation, aldrin
`Kleinbloesem, C. H., van Brummelen, P., Faber, H., Danhof, M.,
`epoxidation, 17P-estradiol 2- and 4-hydroxylation, and the
`Vermeulen, N. P. E., and Breimer, D. D.
`(1984) Biochem. Phar-
`60-hydroxylation of testosterone. In our previous studies we
`macol. 33, 3721-3724
`Kremers, P., Beaune, P., Cresteil, T., de Graeve, J., Columelli, S.,
`found that human liver microsomal d-benzphetamine demeth-
`Leroux, J-P., and Gielen, J. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem. 118,599-606
`ylase activity was also inhibited by anti-human P-4503, which
`Kupfer, A., and Preisig, R. (1984) Eur. J. Clin. Pharrnacol. 26, 753-
`(Wang et al., 1983).
`now has been shown to recognize P - 4 5 0 ~ ~
`759
`This result has
`been confirmed with anti-P-450NF in the
`Laemmli,. U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685
`present study (data not shown). Thus, P-45oNF or a closely
`Larrey, D., Distlerath, L. M., Dannan, G. A., Wilkinson, G. R., and
`related variant also appears to be the major isozyme respon-
`Guengerich, F. P. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 2787-2795
`LeProvost, E., Cresteil, T., Columelli, S., and Leroux, J. P. (1983)
`sible for this activity in human liver. The GB-hydroxylation
`Bzochern. Pharrnacol. 32, 1673-1682
`pathway appears to be the major route of oxidative hepatic
`Loev, B., and Snader, K. M. (1965) J. Org. Chem. 30, 1914-1916
`metabolism of testosterone in humans of either sex (Kremers
`Lowry, 0. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951)
`et al., 1981). If a significant fraction of humans have an in
`J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275
`uiuo deficiency of this activity, the implications are unknown.
`Merck Index (1983) pp. 936-937, Merck and Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ
`Fishman et at. (1980) reported that a sizable fraction of the
`Metzger, H., Shapiro, M. B., Mosimann, J. E., and Viaton, J. E.
`human population was unable to hydroxylate 17P-estradiol in
`(1968) Nature 219, 1166-1168
`Misono, K. S., and Inagami, T. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257,7536-7540
`uiuo, and a sex difference was noted. It is interesting that the
`Omura, T., and Sato, R. (1964) J. Biol. Chem. 239,2370-2378
`fraction of individuals deficient in estrogen metabolism is
`Omura, T., and Takesue, S. (1970) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 67, 249-257
`similar to the fraction deficient in in vivo nifedipine oxidation
`Park, S. S., Fujino, T., West, D., Guengerich, F. P., and Gelboin, H.
`(Kleinbloesem et al., 1984), although in the nifedipine study
`V. (1981) Cancer Res. 42, 1798-1808
`no sex difference was observed. Whether the enzyme we have
`Poruhek, D. J., Namkung, M. J., Juchau, M. R., and Nelson, S. D.
`characterized is involved in both nifedipine oxidation and
`(1984) J. Labelled Compd. Radiophurm. 21, 703-711
`Raemsch, K. D., and Sommer, J. (1983) Hypertension 5, 18-24
`17P-estradiol hydroxylation in vivo is unknown and will re-
`Shimada, T., and Guengerich, F. P. (1985) Mol. Pharrnacol. 28,215-
`quire further study.
`219
`Shimada, T., Misono, K. S., and Guengerich, F. P. (1986) J. Biol.
`Chem. 261,909-921
`Simmons, D. L., and Kasper, C. B. (198.7) J. Riel. rhrn.. 258.9585-
`9588
`Steward, A. R., Dannan, G. A., Guzelian, P. S., and Guengerich, F.
`P. (1985) Mol. Pharmacol. 27, 125-132
`Wang, P., Mason, P. S., and Guengerich, F. P. (1980) Arch. Biochem.
`Biophys. 199,206-219
`Wang, P. P., Beaune, P., Kaminsky, L. S., Dannan, G. A., Kadlubar,
`F. F., Larrey, D., and Guengerich, F. P. (1983) Biochemistry 22,
`5375-5383
`Watkins, P. B., Maurel, P., Schuetz, E. G., Wrighton, S. A., Parker,
`G., and Guzelian, P. S. (1985) Fed. Proc. 44, 1206
`Waxman, D. J. (1984) J. Bid. Chem. 259, 15481-15490
`Waxman, D. J., KO, A., and Walsh, C. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258,
`11937-11947
`Waxman, D. J., Dannan, G. A,, and Guengerich, F. P. (1985) Bio-
`chemistry 24, 4409-4417
`Wislocki, P. G., Miwa, G. T., and Lu, A. Y. H. (1980) in Enzymatic
`Basis of Detoxication (Jakoby, W. B.,
`ed) Vol. 1, pp. 135-182,
`Academic Press, New York
`Wolff, T., Deml, E., and Wanders, H. (1979) Drug Metub. Dispos. 7,
`301-305
`Wray, W., Boulikas, T., Wray, V. P., and Hancock, R. (1981) Anal.
`Biochem. 118, 197-203
`Wrighton, S. A., Maurel, P., Schuetz, E. G., Watkins, P. B., Young,
`B., and Guzelian, P. S. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 2171-2178
`Yasukochi, Y., and Masters, B. S. S. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251,5337-
`5344
`
`REFERENCES
`Augusto, O., Beilan, H. S., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1982) J.
`Biol. Chem. 257,11288-11295
`Beaune, P., Kremers, P., Letawe-Goujon, F., and Gielen, J. E. (1985)
`Biochem. Pharmacol. 34, 3547-3552
`Cheng, K-C., and Schenkman, J. B. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257,2378-
`2385
`Dannan, G. A., Guengerich, F. P., Kaminsky, L. S., and Aust, S. D.
`(1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 1282-1288
`Distlerath, L. M., Reilly, P. E. B., Martin, M. V., Davis, G. G.,
`Wilkinson, G. R., and Guengerich, F. P. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260,
`9057-9067
`Elshourbagy, N., and Guzelian, P. S. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255,
`1279-1285
`Fishman, J., Guzik, H., and Hellman, L. (1970) Biochemistry 9,1593-
`1598
`Fishman, J., Bradlow, H. L., Schneider, J., Anderson, K. E., and
`Kappas, A. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acud. Sci. U. S. A. 77,4957-4960
`Guengerich, F. P. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 2811-2820
`Guengerich, F. P., and Martin, M. V. (1980) Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
`205,365-379
`Guengerich, F. P., Wang, P., Mason, P. S., and Mitchell, M. B. (1981)
`Biochemistry 20,2370-2378
`Guengerich, F. P., Dannan, G. A., Wright, S. T., Martin, M. V., and
`
`’Kindly provided by Dr. P. S. Guzelian, Medical College of Vir-
`ginia, Richmond, VA.
`
`Continued on next page.
`
`Vanda Exhibit 2007 - Page 5
`
`

`
`5056
`
`P-450 Nifedipine Oxidase
`
`Supplemental Material to:
`
`Characterization of Rat and Human Liver Microsomal Cytoehrome
`P-450 Poms Involved in Nifedipine Oxidation. A Pmtotype
`for Genetic Polymorphism in Oxidative Drug Metabolism
`
`F. Peter Guengerich, Martha V. Martin, Philippe H. Beaune,
`Pierre Klemers, Thomas Wolff, and David J. Waxman
`
`EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURFX
`
`"
`
`Chemicals - Nifedipine (3,5-dimethmycarbonyl-2,6-dimethyl-4-LZ-nitrophenyll-l,4-dihydropyri-
`dine) was a gift of Dr. N. Beleher, Pfiner
`Inc., Groton, CT. The pyridine derivative
`of nifedipine
`(3,5-dimethoxycarbo~yl-2,6-dimethyi-4-[ 2-nitrophenyll-pyridine) was a gift of Dr. Jeffrey Idle, St.
`Mary's Hospital Medical School, London, U.K.; a procedure for the Synthesis of this latter compound from
`1965). Nitrendipine was B gift of Dr. A.
`nifedipine has been desoribed elsewhere
`(Low and Snader,
`Scriabqe, Miles Laboratmies, New Haven, CT. CHAPS was purchased from Sigma Chemical
`Co., St.
`Louis, MO. Othel chemic& were prepared as described 01 pwehased fmm sowees listed elsewhere
`(Guengerich and Martin, 1980; Guengwichetg., 1982a, 1962b).
`m- P-450 concentrations were determined speetrelly (Omura and SatO, 19641 using a stand&
`ern-' a t 450 nm. Protein concentrations were estimated as
`difference extincti

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket