throbber
HSL l
`
`/';
`Acta
`Psychiatri ca
`Scandinavica
`
`EDI T OR
`
`Povl Munk-J0rgensen
`
`ASSOCIATE EDITORS
`
`Tom G. Bolw ig
`
`Alv A. Dahl
`
`B. N. Gangadhar
`
`Jeffrey A. Lieberman
`
`Anna -Lena No rdstrom
`
`Hans-Christoph Steinhausen
`
`c:J:
`zm
`-:I> <r
`m~
`::O::J:
`g ...
`)::>
`~»""' c:
`~(/)
`o.O
`G""l ~~
`-
`· U\ 8c l:"-:1 0~
`::1 ~
`•
`0..
`-no
`::E <t>
`~m
`-~
`01o
`- ( / )
`r-..)
`(J)r
`c:>
`~ ~-
`c:> 0 -
`o<
`oro
`Ql lll
`z::O
`(Jl:l>
`-:n
`2:-<
`
`-..1
`
`VOLUME 104 NO 3 SEPTEMBER 2001
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1019
`Page 001
`
`

`
`Acta
`P sychia trica
`Scandinavica
`
`Eo1r01c
`
`Rl>l1'0tt's ADD REss:
`Department of Psychiatric Demography
`Institute Lllr:Basit: Psychiatric Research
`Psychiatl'ic Hllspital in A<lrhus
`Aarhus University Hospit;Ji
`DK,S240 Risskov. Denmark
`Fax: + 45 77 89 28 99
`E-mail: bct@psykiatri.aaa.dk
`
`ASSISTANT TO THt· Eut I'Oit.
`Rasmus W. Licht.
`Ri.>.ikl!l'. Dmmllrl<
`
`AssOC'IAH Eot I'ORs:
`Tom G. Bolwig.
`Copm/wg~11. D~unwr(
`AlvA. Dahl.
`O.tlo, NunrtJy
`B. N. Gangadhat.
`B<mgalut·e. Indio
`JetTrcy A. Liebem,au,
`ChaJ~el IIi//, NC. U<: 1
`Anna-Lena Nord>trc\m,
`Slarkltolm. S"'""''ll
`Hans-Christoph ~teinhaus.:n.
`..lfi1 ich, SH iJ:urlmul
`
`Povl Munk-J0rgensen,
`Risskov, Denmark
`
`E D I TO R lA I. SEC RETARY:
`Birgit.te Christiansen
`Riss"'"'· De11mark
`
`AIM AND SCOP~
`The :tim or Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavicu is to publish articles in English of high scientifk quality
`representing clini~·d l and experimental work in psychiatry. The scope is to act as a n interna tional forum
`for the dissemination of informHtion !!dvancing the science and practice of psychiatry. Origin~! articles
`are welcomed. especially those thm bring new knowledge or extend the present unders tanding of mentnl
`disorders. Pantllcl to original nrticles priority is given to review articles.
`
`Articles requiring rapid publication because of' their significance and timeliness may be? included as
`Short communic;nions not exceeding two printed pages. Debate within psychiatry is encouraged in the
`form of Letters to the editor. All manuscripts published have been asses~cd by two experienced
`referees.
`
`SL•rJSC Rfl'TION
`Two Wllumes of six issues H1'e published each year. Subscription price :100 I including postage: Paper
`only: DKK 3900 (USD .520). Online only: DKK 3510 ( USD 4681. Combined paper and online: DKK
`4290 ( USD 572). All prices are payable in advance ~nd subject to exchange ra te fluctuations.
`Supplements to current volum~s will be supplied to the subscribers at no exlru charge.
`
`OR
`
`ADVISORY BOA Rll ;
`Per Bech.
`11 ill !'I'm/, DtiiiiiU/'~
`Aksel Bertelsen.
`Ril'.l'km·, D<'IIIIWI'h
`Ch<trles l. Bowd~n.
`Sun A1111111i11, I T . I ) A
`Lisa Beth Dixon.
`Maryland. US;I
`Wayne S. Fenton,
`lkt/le.du. lo•I D. £1.\
`Svein Friis,
`Q,,/o. tvorll'ay
`Maui lsohanni.
`Ou/u, 1-'iu/unt!
`Martin B. Kellt'r
`!'I'Mitlenre. R /, L ·A
`Philip W. LavMi
`SUI/I{Ord. CA, u~ r
`Rasmus W . Lichr,
`Risst.m , D<' lllllarl.
`Andres Magnu• ,m.
`0.</o. Norll'a)'
`Wolfg•wg Mai~
`Bmm, Gt'runmy
`John McGratl·
`Wucnl. All.ltralw
`Driss Moussa<
`Cawh/uuctt. A1m'Of('Q
`Lars Oreland.
`l.lflfi.Wkl. Swt•tll'n
`Gordon Park~•
`Srduer, Atl.ltrtl/111
`.Jarl Risberg,
`L1111tl. Su·eden
`Raben Rosenberg.
`Ril'\'kor, D t-llltut•·1
`Wulf Rossler.
`Zurich, Sll'it:rrl d
`Mauricio Silvu de LiOJil.
`Pelo/111. IJmoil
`Nori T<lkei,
`1/almumll.\'11, Jtt
`·11
`Michele Tansella.
`l't.•rcnw. ltuly
`Kristinn T6masson.
`lkykjul'il. , fre/. J
`Michael Trimble,
`Londo//, UK
`Peter Tyrer.
`Lo11tl"" · L'A
`Helene V..:rd" ·~
`Btn•tlratt\, Frant·t.
`Per V('stt:J'!!W ·d.
`Uij·~·knv. /Jt•~nttll'/..
`Ma tti Virkk en.
`l!t·/,inki. Fin/ami
`Htm>-Uirieh Vittchell·
`1\lullich Dn'wlt•lf. {JtJI'UW"'
`L_ _________________________________________________________ ______
`
`Subscription orders may be placed with:
`H eud C!tficl!
`MUNKSGAARD
`lnternatillnal Publishers Ltd.
`35 0 rre Sogade
`P.O. Box 2148
`DK- 1016 Copenhagen K
`Demnark
`Tel: + 45 77 33 33 33
`Fax: + 45 77 33 33 77
`E-mail: customerscrvice@m un ksgaa rd .d k
`http://journals.munksgaard.dk/actapsych
`or wi~h any subscription ilgem. Advertising orders >hould be sent to the publisher ( he<Jcl ollke),
`
`Rcgiouull!jjil'e in US/I
`MUN KSGAARD
`lntemational Publishers Ltd.
`Commerce Place
`350 Main Street
`Malden. MA 02148-5018
`USA
`Tel: (78 1) 3R8-8273
`Fax: ( 78 1) 388-8274
`
`Important - for subscriptions delivered to addJ·esses within the European Union. lf you have~ VAT
`registration number, you must provide this. Otherwise. please add your local VAT o n jo urnals to the
`above price in DKK: Austria 10%. Belgium 6'Yu, Denmark 25'X,, Finland 0%, Franl·e 2.1 ~'/i,. Germany
`7'X•. Greece 4%. Ireland 12.5%. lt~\ ly 4'1-•. Luxembourg 3'Vo. the Netherlands 6%. Portugal 5%.
`Spain 4%. Sweden 15%. UK ax .. Canada: Please add 7'Vo GST.
`
`~ 2(101 Munk.sgaurd lnlemuli()nu l Publishef' Ltd,
`Auth(}rizauun to photocopy item~ for inteTnJl or personal
`usc. or the internal or persona l usc of specific clients. is
`!!ran1ed b) Munksguard lnocrnalion;tt Publishers Lilt r.or
`lihi·aries :.nJ ~:~ther users t'egistered with lh(' C("tpyriglu
`Clearunce Cent~r (CCCI Tmns;t<.:ti('nal R'-'P(lfling St•rvke.
`provided that the base fee ot' USD 12JJQ per copy is p:oid
`directly to CCC. ~21 Ro!)cwuotl Drive, Danvers. MA 019!3,
`ISSN OOOI-690X,1tl01 USD t2Jl0+0.<10. In the U nited
`Stale!-. prl()r 10 pholucOp)'in~ item~ fur edLil:Uiional
`cl~tssroom use. plea:.c !.!01Hu~t the Copyright Clelll';tnte
`Cl'nte.r. 2,2::! R\'~~"H"'I'<I Drive, Ottn..,er:-. MA 0119]3.
`97R.751i·R4110. All oth~r right<. mri11lling micr\lfilm.
`el~.::clronlc and optical stnl'i11g. nntltor cnryiug. l'e!'t'rveU,
`
`Acw Psychiatrica Scandinavica ( ISSN Ull01·6~11X) is
`published mo nLhly by Munksgaord lnL~mu tiulltl l Publishers
`Ltc.l, 35 Nurre Sognd~. 1' .0. Bo' 1t4S. DK-1016
`C'oJX'ntutgen K. Denmark. Porioditals pusltlge paid ~t
`Chumptain NY ami addohonul maihng otfie<$. USA
`Pno;.tm\l'i{CI' for Nonh Amrrican 'luhserihcr~: Send ~•ddre.'\S
`changes IO tMS or NY. P.Q, 13ox 1518, Champluin
`NY- 12919. ( USPS#O I~-.130) Am,JX'«l and maitin!' "' LhC
`USA by tNSA. Prinlc•l in Eu~lnnd by The Churtc~wMrh
`G rilllp. llll,ldcr',ll<ltl.
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1019
`Page 002
`
`

`
`Acta
`P sychiatrica
`Scandinavica
`
`Editorial
`can lil11ium help to prevent suicide?
`R eview artir/es
`Lower suicide risk with long-tenn lithium tr~atment in major affectiVe
`illness: ~ meta-a nalysis
`CYP2D6 and CYP2CI9 genotype-based dose recomm~ndations for
`antidepressants: a first step towards subpopulation-specilic dosages
`
`Original article:>
`Lithium and suicidal behavior in major atlcctive disorder: a case control
`StUd}
`
`Suicidal behaviour and family f:tctors among Dutch and Slovenian high
`school students: a comparison
`The validity of pro~y-based data in suicide research: a study of patients
`50 years of age and older who atlemptec.l suicide. I. Psychiutric diagnoses
`Depression in relation to age and gender in tlte general population: the
`Nord-Trondelag Health Study (HUNT)
`Sociopsychiatric characteristtcs of adolescents who usc computers to
`excess
`Tekps)chiatry: assc~sment of tclcvideo p~ychiatric interview reliability
`with present- and next-generation internet infrastructures
`
`Dysfunction of transcallosally mediated motor inhibition and callosal
`morpholusy in patients with schizophrenia
`
`161
`
`163
`
`17J
`
`193
`
`198
`
`210
`
`217
`
`223
`
`227
`
`llll~lllll!lllliillllll
`
`B890781 8588 1A
`VOLUM E
`1 0 4
`
`NUM BER
`
`3
`
`SE P TEMBER 20 n
`
`L Tondo. J 1/cnnen & R. J. Boldt•.•surmJ
`
`J. Kirdtlteim•r, K. Brv.<ttll. M . L. Dold,
`I, F. Gram, S. Kasp~r. I. Ruut'. F Sj,l., >1.
`£ !)ilitw <~ J. Bruckm(i/ler
`
`W Coryell S. Amdt. C. TuP'<'JI. J Ett•uw/1.
`D. Sui<Jmun. T. Mudlt•r, A. C L<'OII ,{
`Ill. Keller
`Il l. Tomori, C. W. M . Kit'lllwrst,
`E. J. de Wilde & J. l'{/11 den Bout
`K. R. Ctmm•r, P. R. Dul•erslein & Y L ./1/11'~11
`
`£. Stordal. M. Bjam•eit Krilger. N. 11. Dahl.
`0 Kn1t.:~r. A. M J-kil'llm & A. A. Dolt'
`C:-1\. Yang
`
`11. l'osltill(l. J Shigemuru, r 1\ohtll•t" '•I,
`S. Nomum. A·. S/;isltikura. R. Den.
`II. Wuki.wka, S. Kamaw & H. A,/ritf,t
`J. Hiippncr. £ .!<Jmesdt. A. Grofimmm.
`C. -1. 7itl:in. M. Schul:. D. Sch/Ufl.t
`K. Ernst
`
`Case report
`Dose- response relationship of selecti\ e serotonin reuplllkc inhibitors
`treatment-emergent hypomania in depresstvc Jisorders
`Tnvited comm enr
`Biography
`
`236
`
`R. Ramtmtbbt•
`
`23~
`
`240
`
`K. B. Sw~;e
`
`P. Mtmi.-Jorgettsell
`
`Abstracted or indexed in: Biological Abstraci;/ BIOSIS. ADOI\'lS.
`Chemical AbslmCt>. Science Citation Index. Social Sciences Citalion
`Index. SCISEARC H. Research Alrrt. Medical Documentauon
`Service. Current Contents: Life Sciences: Clinical Medicine. Social
`& Behavioral Sciences, EM BASE/ Exccrpw Medic-a. Elst·vicr
`OTOOASE,Currcnt Awarenes> in Biological Scknces. Criminology.
`Penology & Police Science Abstracts. lnde' Medicus ·MEDLii E.
`
`s...ak ....
`Tlll>jOUINI n....Ubi< tO!OU<jhSyne.gy. the F<JIITe><l 01'
`t
`J;!t!)
`Munbga.Md .Jnd Blackwtlf Sdence at www..mon!gg¥td ~
`Reglnt, fof free 10 gtl acct"S'!i tc the joumill. rcc:~\'f'labfe ol CDn:: ,:':
`
`af~ts. fr~ abstrans, pur(haS<" articles from other JoUrnal\. •nd "'
`fo1 subK:rlPt~s.. pltose contact Munttsg~ .. nd tH
`Synergy customonmo<'!!mun!:sgu•d.'k"' )'Oil< subscrip!l01ll9ent.
`
`MUNKSGAA RD . COPEN HAGEN
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1019
`Page 003
`
`

`
`C'up,~u'tsltt 4 Muuk.\l!.tuml l(J(JI
`. i tT4 PSlT'/1/A r ii.I CA
`SC. l N DINA 1'/Crl
`/S.\ N IJ{)(]f.6QIIA
`
`Review article
`cYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype-based
`dose recorr1mendations for antidepressants:
`a first step towards subpopulation-specific
`dosages
`
`Ktrchheiner J, Br0"sen K, Dahl ML Gram LF, Kasper S. Roots I.
`Siiiqvlst F, Spina E, Broc:kmoller J. CYP2D6 and CYP2CI9 genotype(cid:173)
`b;~:>ed dose re.;omm_endatmns for anttdepressants: a fi rst step towards
`~ubpopulation·spectfic dosages.
`,\da Psychiatr Scand 2001: 104: 173 192. ' ' Munksgaard 200 I.
`
`Objective: This review aimed to provide distinct dose recommendations
`lll r an!idepressants based on the genotypes of cytochrome P450 enzymes
`('YP2D6 and CYP2C I9. This approach may be a useful complemen(cid:173)
`lt~liou to clini~.:al monitoring and therapeutic drug monitoring.
`I \lcthod: Our literature search covered 32 antidepressants marketed in
`lliurope. Canada, and the United States. We evaluated studies which had
`
`eomp<~red pharmw.:okinetic parameters of antidepressants among poor,
`Intermediate. extensive and ultrarapid metabolizers.
`Results: For 14 antidepressants, distinct dose recommendations for
`, c~tensive, intermediate aJ1d poor metaboli7.ers of either CYP2D6 or
`CYP2CI9 were given . Foor the tricyclic antidepressants, close reductions
`around 50'Yo were generallly recommenJed for poor metabolizers of
`~ubstrates of CYP2D6 or CYP2C 19. whereas differences were smaller
`for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
`Conclusion: We have proovided prelimina ry average dose suggestions
`based on the phenotype or genotype. This is a first attempt to apply the
`new pharmacogenetics to suggest dose-regimens that take the di fferences
`in drug metabolic capacity into account.
`
`J. Kirchheiner1, K. Br.osen2
`
`,
`, S. Kasper4
`M. L Dahl3
`, L. F. Gram2
`,
`I. Roots1
`, F. Sjtiqvise . E. Spina5
`,
`J. Brockmtiller6
`'Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Cha1ite. Humboldt
`University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 'Institute of
`Public Health, Climcal Pharmacology, OdensP.,
`Denmark. ~Department of Clinical Pharmacology,
`Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital.
`Huddinge, Sweden, ''Department of General
`Psychiatry, University of Vienna, Vienrta, Au~tna,
`51nstotute of Clinlcal Pharmacology. University of
`Messina, Messina. Italy and "Department of Clinical
`Pharmacology, GP.org·August·Universoty, Gtittingen.
`Germany
`
`Key words polymmphism; anttdepressanl therapy:
`pharmacogenetics; cytocltrome P-450. CYP2D6:
`CYP2CI9
`
`Prof Dr JOrgen Brockmiiller. Universitatsklinikum,
`Abteilung K/inische Pharmakologie. Roberi·Koch·Str
`40, 37075 Gfittingen, Germany
`E-mail: jbrockm@gwtly.de
`
`Accepted for puhlir.atmn 13 Ma1ch. 2001
`
`Introduction
`Genetic factors have long been known to cause
`mterindividual differenoes in pham1acokinetics,
`entcacy and adverse effects of antidepressant
`Jrugs (ADs) ( I, 2). Numerous studies have now
`been performed on the impact of genetic po ly(cid:173)
`ITJorphisms in cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP)
`un
`the disposition olf antidepressant drugs.
`P~rticularly well cha racterized is the significant
`cftcc·t of the CYP2D6 and CYP2CJ9 polymorph-
`1'lllS on
`the pharmacokinetics of almost all
`lr1~Y~Iic and many other antidepressant~. The
`J~IIV,Jties of" these two en:zymes are both bimodally
`dtstnbuted in the Ca ucasian population. allowing
`•lassification of individuals into extensive (EM)
`
`and poor (PM) meta bolizers. The CYP2D6
`polymorphism was discovered in the 1970s as
`sparteine and debrisoquine oxidation polymorph(cid:173)
`isms (3, 4). The CYP2Cl9 polymorphism was
`initially identified as S-mephenytoin hydroxylation
`polymorphism (5). The frequency of CYP poly(cid:173)
`morphisms has now been investigated in different
`populations a nd the allele frequencies have been
`found
`to differ substantially. Consideration of
`interethnic differences is therefore necessary (6, 7).
`The effects of these polymorphisms on the
`clinical pharmacology of antidepressants have
`been reviewed previously (8- 12). Poor metaboli(cid:173)
`zers of C YP2D6 or CYP2C l9 substrates may be
`more likely to suffer from adverse drug effects
`than extensive metabolizers when laking nonnal
`
`173
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1019
`Page 004
`
`

`
`Kirchheiner el al.
`
`doses of drugs that <lre active per sc and are
`these pathways. The
`metabolized main ly via
`exten t of these potential problems largely depends
`on the relative contrihution of the respective CYP
`enzyme to the total elimination of the drug and
`the drug ( 11). The
`index of
`thera peutic
`the
`molecular genetic ba is of CYP polymorphi ms
`has been elucidated to an extent which allow a
`clinically useful prediction of a patient's drug
`metabolic phenotype (13 15). Such a genotyping
`before treatment has already earlier been postu(cid:173)
`lated as a useful tool to prevent adverse effects,
`especially for drugs with a relati vely narrow
`in forma t ion
`( 16. 17). This
`range
`therapeutic:
`in provision of average dose
`might be used
`recommendations for different genetic subpopula(cid:173)
`turn provide
`tions of patients. This may in
`therapeutic and pharmacoeconomic benefits ( 18,
`19). Genetic analyses of the metabolizer s tatus
`will become more common for clinicians in the
`it
`tha t
`the advantage
`future. Genotyping has
`needs to be performed only once in life for each
`patient and the costs of this analysis are tower
`I day of stay in hospital. With current
`than
`technology, such genotype analyses may be
`performed within a few hours. Analogous to the
`routinely used dose adjustment tables for the
`dosage of digox in or aminoglycosides in patients
`to do e
`with kidney disease, or analogous
`the specific age
`for
`tables used
`adjustment
`groups in paediatrics. specific recommendations
`will be required about how to adjust the drug
`dosages to an intlividual's specific drug metabolic
`phenotype. For CYP206, the overall sensitivity of
`genotyping tests to predict the phenotypical poor
`metabolizer is more than 99% when testing for the
`common inactive alleles (*3. *4. *5. *6, *7, *8,
`* 16) in the Caucasian population ( 15, 18. 20).
`intermediate
`Molecular genetic prediction of
`metabolizers (I M) was less accurate considering
`the allele variants given above. but precisio n of
`intermediate metabolizers
`identification of
`the
`may be improved consideriJlg CYP2D6 allele *2
`variants (2 1 ). For CYP2C l9, genotyping is able to
`identify bet ween 93 and I OOtV,, of the phenotypic
`poor metabolizers ( 13. 22- 26).
`The goal of this review was to derive anti(cid:173)
`depressant dose recommendations based on drug
`metabolic phcno- or genotype and. if such data
`for
`identify priorities
`to
`were not available.
`:.tudie:.
`further clinical studies. Since efficacy
`have not been performed for each genotype, we
`have assu med that equa l plasma concentrations
`imply equal drug effects.
`Dose adjustments based on the genotype or the
`polymorphic drug metabolizing enzymes are
`
`174
`
`complicated by the existence of active mt:tabolitc~
`therefore
`turn arc metabolized. We
`in
`that
`provide references to several reviewers who huve
`studied the role of active metabolites for the
`overall antidepressa nt effects (17- 29). The elim.
`ination of antidepressants may be profoundll
`influenced by metabolic drug interactions. Severjl
`reviews focus on the inhibitory properties on
`drug metabolism of antidepressants. and e~pc­
`cially elaborate on the prediction of mctabohc
`drug interactions and the possibilities to avoid
`them (28, 27 38).
`To adjust optimally fo1· drug interactions and
`other factors such as compliance, age or liver
`function impairment , close clinical monitoring ol
`the patients and therapeutic drug monitoring are th~
`essential tools in dose optimization (39. 40). General
`problems in dose finding for antidepressant drug~
`have been discu ed previously (41). There is little
`convincing evidence that different types of depre,.
`sion require different doses but in other condition>.
`such as pain, enuresis, anxiety, etc. the dol>~!
`req uirements may be different compared to tlepre,.
`sion (42). For the tril:ydi,c antidepressants, earb
`experiences with severe tolerability problems apJ)Uill
`to have determined the rather cautious dosing polic)
`often employed. Concentration efTect studie'
`revealed clear-cut relationships for some tric~clic
`antidepressants (imipramine, nortriptyline) wluc:h
`became the ba is for recommended therapeutic dru~
`monitoring procedures (43, 44). However, in general
`there appears to be no simple relationship bet"een
`dosage, plasma concentration and clinical outcome
`of antidepressants as a whole. The newer antide(cid:173)
`pressants. especially the selective serotonin reupw~c
`inhibitors (SSRls) such as fluoxetine revealed Oal
`and overlapping dose- effect curves for the mllt
`depressant and adver e effects (45). Unfortunatcl)(cid:173)
`these dose- effect studies contain little infonn;Jll011
`on the underlying pharmacokinetic and phannaCl ...
`genetic variability which may explain interpatJetl!
`response variability on a given dose. i\ssessmenl'11
`the genetically determined variability in drug con·
`centration may indeed contribute to impro1 ~ 111'
`therapeutic effect and reduce the risk of dropollb
`due to tolerability problems.
`
`Methods of data analysis
`Definitions and study tnclusiOn cntena
`nt•
`We considered all studies on .:~utidepr~''j1
`.,t
`except those on lithium, antipsychotics 11~1e1 rtll
`'ewct <1
`W

`··lilt)
`e rev-t
`epress1on and on herbal drugs.
`d
`.tl er ht•l
`.
`I
`d
`:1'
`·rn tl''
`e1 1
`stuatc$ con uctec
`tn humans,
`volunteers or patients. in which th~ ph11
`,,
`'
`'
`kinetic and/or pharmacodynamic puramelct·~
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1019
`Page 005
`
`

`
`~~~~ucip!ltmn ot CYP206 and CYP2C 19 in the blOtraJJsformatton of
`1
`ts· qualitative data baseli on studies on humans
`~"~san· ·
`___-
`
`Reference
`
`CYP2C19
`
`CYP206
`
`illlOIOB
`
`T.lmme
`
`rboxazode
`Ill amine
`' ijfiline
`
`yes
`
`yes
`
`yes
`
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`
`no
`
`no
`
`ye~
`
`yes
`yes
`yes
`ves
`yes
`
`00
`no
`
`yes
`yes
`yes
`
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`yes
`
`no
`yes
`
`yes
`yes
`yes
`
`110
`no
`no
`
`no
`yes
`yes
`ye~
`yes
`yes
`yes
`
`No data
`(50)
`(511
`{521
`{53)
`{541
`{52)
`No data
`{55)
`(56)
`(56)
`(57)
`{58)
`{5g)
`{58)
`[60)
`161)
`162)
`163)
`164)
`165)
`1661
`167)
`1681
`169)
`170)
`(71)
`No data
`No dat~
`{72)
`{73)
`174)
`175)
`176)
`(61)
`(62)
`(77)
`t68)
`{77)
`lBO)
`IBl)
`178)
`1821
`No data
`No data
`No data
`(83)
`lf1.41
`1831
`185)
`1481
`1861
`1851
`187)
`1881
`189)
`190)
`1911
`1921
`(93)
`194)
`(95)
`149)
`(96)
`
`I~
`
`CYP206 and -2C19-based dose rocommendations
`
`Table 1 (Contmued)
`
`Phenelzme
`Protriptyline
`Reboxeune
`Sertraline
`Tianepline
`Tranytcypromme
`Trazodone
`Tnmipramone
`
`Venlafaxllle
`
`Viloxazone
`
`IIY
`lltl
`nn
`
`no
`yes
`
`yes
`yes
`yes
`
`Nu data
`No} data
`197)
`1721
`(98)
`No data
`(99)
`(100)
`(101)
`(47)
`(1021
`(1031
`no data
`
`Yer;. effect of CYP2C19 or CYP206 shown
`No: no effect ot CYP2C19 or CYP206,
`
`antidepressants were measured, and where the
`polymorphic traits of CYP2C 19 and CYP2D6
`were determjned. Data from current Medline and
`Embase databases were used. We searched for any
`word combinatio n of antidepressant* or antide(cid:173)
`pressive* with polymorph*, CYP*, cytochrome*,
`P450*, debrisoqu*,
`sparteine*, dextromelhor(cid:173)
`phan* and mephenytoin* and the same search
`was ca rried out for all generic names of the
`specific antidepressants marketed in Japan, the
`United States and major European countries.
`Furthermore, manufacturers of all a ntidepressants
`included in this study were asked to provide
`unpublished data.
`The CYP polymorphisms can be distinguished
`either by genotyping or by phenotyping methods.
`Tn studies usmg genotyping methods, subjects
`with three or more active alleles, i.e. carriers of
`CYP2D6 gene duplications (46) were classified as
`ultrarapid metabolizers (UM). Subjects with two
`active a lleles (* 1. *2, *9. *10 and * 17) were
`classified as extensive metabolizers, heterozygous
`carriers of one active and one deficient a llele, thus
`carriers of one of the a lleles * I, *2. *9, *JO, * 17
`or other more rare active alleles combined with
`one of the a lleles *3, *4, *5. *6, *7, *8 or other
`more rare completely deficient alleles were termed
`intermediate metabolizers (IM)
`in
`the present
`review, because the subpopulation-specific clear(cid:173)
`ance of this group is between extensive and poor
`metabo]jzers. Subjects with two inactive alleles
`(*3, *4, *5, *6. *7. *8) were classified as PM. As
`an exception to this classification, in three studies
`from Asiatic populations
`(47-49) earners of
`two intermediately active alleles *9 and * 10 of
`CYP2D6 were classified as !Ms. R ecent studies
`may even allow to distinguish the intermediate
`metabolizer group into further subgroups based
`on subtypes of allele *2 (21 ), but no data existed
`with respect to a ntidepressants. Much of the data
`on intermediate metabolizers in this review were
`
`175
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1019
`Page 006
`
`

`
`Kirchheincr et al.
`
`Table 2- Classification of antldepressar11 dwg metabolites
`
`Substance
`
`Principle metabolites •
`
`Fwther acllve metabolites
`
`Nortriptyline
`
`N -desmethyl-r.lt~miptamine
`
`1 0-hydroxy-arnitr ipty1ine. 1 0-hydroxy-nmu ipl)lline
`1!-butythydroxy-bupropion. Threohydro·bupropion
`N·desmethyl-citalopram, N·didesmetllyl-c•talopram
`B-hydro~y-clomipramine
`2-hydroxy-desipramine
`N·desmethyl-doxepin
`
`2 -hydroxy· 11r11prarn~ne
`N-desmethyl·maprotilllle, 2, 3-hydroxy-marrotlllne
`8-hydroxy-mianserin
`N·desmethyl·mirtazapine
`Ro-5637
`2·hydroxv·nelazodone. P-hydro~y-nefazodone, Triazole dione,
`M·chlorophenyl-plperozine tmCPPI
`1 O·hvdro~v·nortriptyline
`
`lnactiVP. merabolltes
`
`N-dP.srnethyl nortllptyline
`Erythrnillydro-llupropion
`Citalopram N-o~rde
`
`N-desmethvl·lluvoxamrne
`
`Mianserin N-oxide
`B·hydroxv·mirtazapute
`Ro-12-8095
`
`Oxidized and phase-It intermediates
`
`1\nlltllptylina
`Bupropron
`tR.S)-Cita1opram
`Clomipramine
`Desrpramlne
`IU~Ooxepin
`IR.S)-Fiuoxetine
`Fluvoxamrne
`hnr~ran11ne
`Mattrotiline
`(R.S~Mranserin
`(R.S)-Mirtazapine
`Moclobemide
`Nela1odone
`
`Norlluoxetine
`
`Des•pramlne
`
`N·dP.smethvl·mianserin
`
`Nortriptyline
`Oxaprotiline
`Paroxetine
`Phenelzine
`Prot11ptyline
`Reboxetine
`Sertraline
`Tianept111e
`T ranylcyprom•ne
`Trazodone
`Troniipramine
`(R,S}-Venlataxine O·desmethyl-ventafaxine
`
`N-desmethyl·sertral•ne
`
`EthOXy-phenoxy·hydroxy-reboxetrne, D-desethyl-rebo1e\l
`N·livdroxy-sertrallne
`
`m·CPP
`N-desmethyl·trimrpramrne. 2-hydroxy trlmtpramrne
`
`Chlurophenyl-hydroxv·TRA
`
`N·deslnethyl-venlafaxine. N·,O·drdesmethyl·venlafa>•flf
`
`mainly on experimental data on receptor ,,,
`transporter binding.
`In some cases. such a'
`different
`described
`below
`for
`nortriptyline,
`approaches gave Incongruent results. Besides thei1
`intrinsic potency, the clinical effects of metabolite'
`depend on their vol ume of distribution and rate ol
`d iffusion into the central nervous systern (CNSJ
`The lipid solubility of most metabolites is decreaMJtl
`compared to the parent drug which may result i~ a
`smaller volume of distribution and a reduced ubthll
`to pass the blood- brain barrier.
`
`Handling of pharmacokinetlc data
`We have based the dose recommendations oJT
`pharmacokinetic parameters which are gencr:tlll
`linear and thus proportional to dose such as ar(a
`under the curve (AUC). total cleantnce (CI) Hn•!
`(Css ) because
`steady-state
`trough
`levels
`tilt'
`~ . ~
`'
`~
`method of dose adjustment may be sutnc1er• ·
`accurate in most cases. For druus with non-line<ll
`pharmacokinetics. such as clomfr>ramine, degi~r:r·
`.
`.
`.
`.
`I b
`'d
`. ·pranJIII~
`mtne,
`tmtpntmtne. moe o emr e,
`tn tllt
`•
`paroxetine, Auvoxamine and possib ly O~toxetlll~
`the genotype-based dose adjustments ure tn theO
`11
`studl~l
`17
`. 1
`. r,
`"
`.
`,,1
`tn
`s pecwc
`.o r
`the doses
`tested
`Furthermore. because the relative t.:ontnbutto~ 111
`s pecific cytochrome P450 enzymes m<•Y depen.
`,
`1
`the substrate concen tration, the recomlnendillll ·
`
`11 1
`
`• Princtple metabolites· activtty comparable to that ot the parent drug
`
`intermediate
`based on phenotypically identified
`sparteine or
`metabolizers with debrisoquine,
`dextrometho rphan for C YP2D6 or the mepheny(cid:173)
`toin test for CYP2C l 9. We a lso
`included one
`study usi ng quinidine as an inhibitor of CYP2D 6
`to mimic the poor metabolizer status.
`
`Consideration of active metabolites for genotype-based
`dose-recommendations
`Antidepressants undergo multiple biotransforma(cid:173)
`tions in the liver. producing progressively more
`polar metabolites which can be eliminated more
`the kidneys. Jf the
`readily by
`the
`liver or
`antidepressant activity of a metabolite is compar(cid:173)
`able to that of the parent drug (usually demon(cid:173)
`strated only in vitro) and if the metabolite exists in
`considerable concentrations in plasma. it was
`considered as a principle metabolite (27). Such
`metabolites were taken into account in the dose
`recommendations by adding their plasma concen(cid:173)
`trations to those of the parent drug. We did not
`consider active metabolites wh ich are formed in
`minor quantities, have short half-lives, or are
`subs tantially
`less active than
`the parent drug
`(Table 1 ). Our classification is not com plete, but
`includes the relevant metabolites which have been
`studied clinically in this context. T hese classifica(cid:173)
`tions are of a preliminary nature. as they are based
`
`176
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1019
`Page 007
`
`

`
`fllliCOkrnetrc p~rameters conr.ernrng CYP2D6
`J Pflar
`;_--
`
`Par am.
`
`UM
`
`EM
`
`Ill! II! -----
`
`ll)IYIII(I!
`
`, cMI
`, CMI
`"'""'e
`
`~t:tlflt!
`
`Nor.fXT
`, Nor·FXT
`ru1.1morre
`
`1111mrne
`
`-DMI
`llol~olollne
`
`Maorserin
`
`./,l.d~senn
`
`RIMianserin
`~MtO·MIA
`SlMIA+D·MIA
`1 n111aplne
`kobemlde
`
`'O'tliOdone
`
`mriptvlme
`
`rn•e110e
`
`:mehne
`ilOdone
`vramrne
`
`·rotax•~e
`
`AUC
`AUC
`Css
`AUG
`Css
`AlJC
`Css
`AlJC
`Css
`Css
`AUC
`Css
`AUG
`AUG
`AUG
`Css
`Css
`AlJG
`AUG
`AUG
`AUG
`AUG
`AlJC
`AUG
`AlJC
`AlJC
`Css
`Css
`AUG
`Css
`Css
`Css
`Css
`AUG
`Css
`AUC
`AUC
`Css
`AUC
`AUG
`AUC
`AUC
`Gss
`AUC
`AUG
`AUG
`AUC
`AUC
`AUC
`Css
`AUC
`Css
`AUC
`AUC
`AUC
`
`10
`
`0.18
`
`0,23
`
`08
`
`19
`1 7
`1154
`3.7
`0.13
`46
`020
`32
`0.69
`0.63
`LO
`021
`15
`1.0
`3.8
`0.30
`118
`5.3
`1.6
`25.8
`6.8
`100
`1.4
`2.5
`2.3
`2.3
`0 38
`0 42
`83
`0.09
`0.03
`0.16
`0.05
`0.56
`028
`0 64
`LO
`86
`110 1
`2.6
`13.6
`18
`0.39
`1.3
`22
`1 7
`0,55
`2,6
`1.4
`1.5
`12
`39
`12
`07
`64
`
`CYP206 and -2C l9-based dose recommendations
`
`PM
`
`Dose lmg)
`
`MfS
`
`Nromber tEMfiMfPM)
`
`Reference
`
`4 1
`3.0
`1 3
`5.6
`0 15
`4.7
`0.57
`5.7
`2 1
`1.25
`
`1.4
`66
`8.0
`33.0
`0.90
`
`38.5
`6.1
`536
`8.6
`1.3
`5.3
`2.1
`4.4
`43
`18
`04
`29 0
`0.05
`
`0.24
`
`0.94
`044
`11
`1.9
`65
`84.1
`2.5
`15.9
`3.9
`0.96
`4.3
`
`4.2
`3.9
`44
`1 5
`
`3.6
`41
`
`2,9
`476
`
`50
`50
`150
`75
`300
`40
`150
`100
`150
`125
`100
`100
`25
`25
`100
`100
`100
`60
`20
`60
`20
`50
`50
`(00
`100
`100
`100
`150
`100
`67
`30
`67
`30
`30
`67
`30
`15
`450
`600
`200
`400
`28.5
`150
`25
`25
`285
`30
`30
`50
`150
`75
`300
`31
`19
`225
`
`s
`s
`M
`s
`M
`M
`M
`s
`M
`M
`s
`M
`s
`s
`s
`M
`M
`s
`s
`s
`s
`s
`s
`M
`s
`s
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`s
`M
`s
`s
`M
`M
`s
`M
`s
`M
`s
`s
`s
`s
`M
`s
`M
`s
`M
`s
`M
`M
`
`5/3/3
`2/4(3
`11/0/4
`4/0/3
`4/0(3
`10/0/8
`35/0/1
`15/0/10
`35/0/1
`15/0/5
`5/6/0/0
`28(0/2
`8/0/6
`5(0/4
`6/6/6
`29/0/2
`4/5/0
`6/ll/6
`9/0/10
`6/0/6
`9/0/10
`10/0/5
`10/0/4
`8/0/2
`6/6/6
`6/5/5
`28/0/2
`75/0/5
`6/0/6
`21/711
`14/1/0
`2ln/1
`14/1/0
`10/0/5
`21fl/l
`10/0/5
`7/0/7
`22/0/5
`2/0(2
`10(0/10
`10/0/10
`2/3/2
`7/13/1
`6/5/5/5
`10/5/0
`2/4/2
`9/0/8
`9/018
`10/0/10
`46/8/0
`1/0/1
`25/0/1
`8/4/0
`8/0/6
`22/6/3
`
`(531'
`(51)'
`(521'
`(50)'
`(55)"
`(56)
`(57)
`(58)
`157)
`(59)
`(70)
`162)'
`(63)
`(64)
`(61)
`(69)'
`(71)'
`(73)'
`(721
`(73)'
`(72)
`(75)
`(74)
`(76)
`(61)
`(77)'
`(62)
`(83)
`(841
`(861
`(48\'
`(86)
`(48)'
`(85)
`1861
`185)
`(871
`188)
`(891'
`1911
`(91)
`(107)'
`(94)
`(95)'
`(49)'
`(92)'
`(96)
`(961
`(721
`(99)'
`(1001'
`(101)
`(47)'
`(102)
`(103)
`
`IM
`
`28
`28
`
`61
`
`530
`
`26
`2.5
`
`0.08
`om
`0.2
`0.14
`
`0 36
`
`3.1
`0.5
`3.6
`4,0
`30
`
`18
`
`4.6
`
`113
`
`"'COlumn Param · refers to the measured pharmacokinetic parameter. either the area under the curve (AUCI 1n )tM.h or the steady-stare trough conr.emration (Css) rn ~M
`values for ultra-raprd metabohzers (UM), extensrve metabolizers IEM). onlermedrate metabohzers liM I and poor metabolizers (PMI are goven in the respective columns
`' l;llfumn 'dose' refers to the dose tested in the respectrve studres.
`No•-FXT sum of Huoxetine and nortluoxetine: + D-MIA· sum of mianserin and desmethylmianserin: t D-CML sum of clom1pramme and desrnethylclornipranune: 1 NT: sum
`4111itrrp!VIIne and nortnp!VIine,
`COlumn MIS refers to the fact whether lire parameters were denved from multr~le·dose (MI or srngle·dose lSI studies
`l~na recalculatrorr, e.g data calculation from values presenred in figures
`
`177
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1019
`Page 008
`
`

`
`I .. .. . .
`I
`1
`
`Kirchhe incr c t a l.
`
`may not be valid far outside the dose range or the
`reviewed studies (104).
`Studies which provided only the ratios between
`the concentrations of the parent drug and its
`metabolite and not the actual plasma concentration
`data could not serve for quantitative dose adjust(cid:173)
`ments. Since such metabolic ratios provide informa(cid:173)
`tion about the cytochrome enzymes in' olved in the
`metabolism. we have included them in the qualita(cid:173)
`tive Table 2.
`recorded covariables such as
`Although we
`gender. age. ethnicity. dose level and tobacco
`smoking. the limited availability of such data
`made it impossible to consider these variables
`systematically in the dose recommendations.
`When the differences in pharmacokinetic data
`between PMs and EMs, or IMs and EMs. were
`statistically significant, dose recommendations were
`deduced by calculating the ratios of AUC or Cs
`between PMs and EMs and. if available, between
`IMs and EMs. lf severul studies were available for
`one drug, we summarized the AUCs or Css by
`calculating the weighted mean from the various
`studies. T his was the case for clomipramine (57. 59.
`104), desipramine studies with single-dose drug
`application (61 , 64. 105) and multiple-dosing (62.
`69). nuoxetine (studies providing data on F LU and
`NOR-FLU) (71. 73). fluvoxam ine (72 75), imipra(cid:173)
`mine concerning CYP2D6 (61. 77) and CYP2Cl9
`(82. 106). nortriptyline for !;ingle-dose drug applica(cid:173)
`tion (49, 92. 95, 107) an d venlafaxine ( 102, 103).
`Studies including only one poor metabolizer were
`also included. but dose recommendations must be
`considered with caution if these da ta are the only
`available fo r a particular substance.
`tudies from those
`We distinguished single-dose
`where steady-state plasma levels of a drug were
`achieveu. Dose rccommendutions were calculated
`the beginning of the treatment
`separately for
`(re~u lts of single-dose studie ) and ror multiple(cid:173)
`dose treatment (mainly but not alw:Jys at steady
`state). If data were not given in the texb or tables.
`but were possible to derive from table · or figures. or
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket