throbber
UlllVElfl'|'Y OF IOWA
`
`rmlmnvm ll mmnumm mm
`
`3
`
`037 001 306
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 001
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 001
`
`

`
`JOINT EDITORS
`
`Professor Stuart A Montgomery
`StMary's Hospital Medical School
`London UK
`
`Professor Martin B Keller
`Brown University
`Providence USA
`
`FOUNDING EDITOR
`Professor Trevor Silverstone
`University of Otago
`Dunedin New Zealand
`
`MANAGING EDITOR
`
`Deirdre Montgomery
`StMary's Hospital Medical School
`London UK
`
`ADDRESS ALL
`MANUSCRIPTS &
`CORRESPONDENCE TO:
`
`Professor SA Montgomery
`International Clinical
`Psychopharmacology
`P.O. Box 8751
`London W13 8WH
`UK
`Fax: +44 181 566 7986
`E-mail:
`ICP@montgomery.demon.co.uk
`
`AIMS AND SCOPE
`
`International Clinical Psychopharmacol(cid:173)
`ogy provides an essential link between re(cid:173)
`search and clinical practice throughout
`psychopharmacology. It reports on stud(cid:173)
`ies in human subjects, both healthy vol(cid:173)
`unteers and patients, which relate the ef(cid:173)
`fects of drugs on psychological processes.
`A major objective of the journal is to
`publish fully refereed papers which throw
`light on the ways in which the study of
`psychotropic drugs in health and disease
`can increase our understanding of
`psychopharmacology. To this end the
`journal publishes the results of early Phase
`I and II studies, as well as those of
`controlled clinical trials of psychotropic
`drugs in Phase III and IV. Other topics
`covered include the epidemiology of
`psychotropic drug prescribing and drug
`taking, the sociology of psychotropic
`drugs including compliance, and research
`into the safety of and adverse effects of
`these compounds.
`
`International Clinical
`Psychopharmacology
`
`An International Journal for Collaboration between Research and
`Clinical Practice
`
`EDITORIAL BOARD
`
`C Altamura, University of Milan, Italy
`
`T Barnes, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK
`
`M Bourin, Universite de Names, France
`
`G D Burrows, University of Melboume, Victoria, Australia
`
`G B Cassano, University of Pisa, Italy
`
`E F Coccaro, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
`
`J C Cookson, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
`
`P Deniker, Universite de Sainte Anne, Paris, France
`
`H Dufour, Clinique Psychiatrique Universitaire, Lausanne, Switzerland
`
`H Emrich, Max Planck Institute, Miinchen, Germany
`
`J P Feighner, Feighner Research Institute, Poway, Cal(fornia, USA
`
`S Garattini, Instituto di Richerche Farmacologiche, Milan, Italy
`
`C-G Gottfries, Saint Jorgen 's Hospital, Hisings-Backa, Sweden
`
`P Grof, Royal Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
`
`I Hindmarch, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
`
`L Hollister, University ofTexas, Houston, Texas, USA
`
`T Itil, New York University Medical Cellter, New York, USA
`
`D King, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
`
`B Leonard, University College, Galway, Ireland
`
`0 Lingjaerde, Gaustad Hospital, Gaustad, Oslo, Norway
`
`J J L6pez-Ibor, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
`
`J Mendlewicz, Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
`
`R M Post, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, M(//)'land, USA
`
`T Shibuya, Tokyo Medical College, Japan
`
`M Versiani, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
`
`H Westenberg, Academic Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
`
`Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 002
`
`

`
`. ·
`. JlJL c 3 79t~ 11 a
`Internationaf\tlinical
`sychopharmacology
`
`!
`

`
`!llternational Clinical Psychopharmacology is
`published bimonthly in 1998, in January,
`March, May, July, September and November.
`
`Subscription rates for volume 13, 1998
`(6 issues)
`Institutional: US$580
`Personal: US$205
`Personal ;ubscriptions must be prepaid by
`bankers' draft, personal cheque or credit card,
`and a home address given for delivery.
`
`Prices do not include sales tax, e.g. VAT, GST,
`MVG, MWS, AST and regional sales tax.
`Where applicable, please add sales tax to the
`listed prices at the appropriate rate.
`
`Prices include packing and posting by acceler(cid:173)
`ated surface post to subscribers outside the UK.
`(Airmail delivery is available at extra cost.
`Please contact the relevant subscription office
`for information.)
`
`U.S. Postmaster: Send address corrections to
`Mercury Airfreight International Ltd, 365 Blair
`Road, Avenel, NJ 07001, USA.
`
`This journal accepts advertising. We can also
`provide oflprints (minimum quantity 100) of
`any article, and larger quantities of reprints to
`meet corporate requirements. Rates for offprints
`and reprints are available from the Reprints Ad(cid:173)
`ministrator. flltematimzal Clinical Psychophar(cid:173)
`macology also publishes supple-ments on be(cid:173)
`half of academic and corporate sponsors. Sup(cid:173)
`plements are normally supplied to subscribers
`at no extra charge.
`
`Advertising: Point of Difference Limited, 59
`Merton Hall Road, London SWI9 3PR, UK
`Tel: 0181 880 8122; Fax: 0181 802 4189
`E-mail: pointofdif@ramuk.demon.co.uk
`Offprints/reprints: Offprints Administrator
`Publication of supplements: Special Sales
`Department
`
`ISSN: 0268-1315
`
`SUPPLEMENT 5 SEPTEMBER 1998
`
`Care of Depression in Older Patients
`
`1 . . . -
`
`Proceedings of a Lundbeck symposium held in Copenhagen,
`7-8 Novemberl998

`
`GUEST EDITORS:
`C. G. Gottfries, J. Mendlewicz and S.A. Montgomery
`
`Supported by an educational grant from H. L~ndbeck A/S
`
`CONTENTS
`
`S 1
`
`S3
`
`. Introduction
`J. Mendlewicz
`
`Is depression under-recognised and undertreated? ·
`Y. Lecrubier
`
`S7 Epidemiology of depression in the elderly
`J.P. Lepine and S. Bouchez
`
`S 13 Is there a difference between elderly and younger patients with regard to

`-
`the symptomatology and aetiology of depression?
`C.G. Gottfries
`
`S 19 Quality of life and social issues in older depressed patients
`J.P. Warner
`
`S25 Cardiovascular effects of antidepressant drugs: updated
`A.H. Glassman
`
`S31 Simple steps to diagnosis at primary care centres
`S. Noltorp, C.G. Gottfries and N. Norgaard
`
`S35 Care of depression in the elderly: comparative pharmacokinetics of SSRis
`P.Baumann
`
`S45 Differences in interactions of SSRis
`K. Br0sen
`
`S49 Efficacy and safety of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treating
`depression in elderly patients
`S.A. Montgomery
`
`(contents continued overleaf)
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 003
`
`

`
`Subscription orders and enquiries
`Japan:
`Jgaku-Shoin Ltd, 1-28-36 Hongo,
`Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
`Tel: +81 3 3817 5675
`Fax: +81 3 3815 6776
`
`Rest of World:
`Subscriptions Department,
`Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
`12107 Insurance Way, Hagerstown,
`MD 21740, USA
`Tel: +1 301 714 2300
`Fax: + 1 301 824 7390
`in the USA, call tolljree on
`1 800 638 3030
`
`Publisher
`Caroline Black
`
`Managing Editor, Supplements
`Neil Morris
`
`Production Assistants
`James Young
`Anna McGrath
`
`The paper used in this publication conforms to
`American National Standards ANSI Z3948-1984.
`
`Copyright© 1998 Lippincott Williams &
`Wilkins
`All rights reserved; no part of this publication may
`be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
`transmitted in any form or by any means, elec(cid:173)
`tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or
`otherwise without either the prior written permis(cid:173)
`sion of the Publisher or a licence permitting re(cid:173)
`stricted copying issued in the UK by the Copy(cid:173)
`right Licensing Authority and in the USA by the
`Copyright Clearance Center.
`
`Applications for permission should be addressed
`to the International Rights Manager, Lippincott
`Williams & Wilkins, 227 East Washington Square,
`Philadelphia, PA !9106-380, USA
`Fax: +I 215 238 4419
`
`Disclaimer
`The publisher, the authors and editors accept no
`responsibilities for loss incurred by any person act(cid:173)
`ing or refraining from action as a result of material
`in or omitted from the journal.
`
`ISSN: 0268-1315/98
`
`/
`
`·International Clinical
`Psychopharmacology
`
`An International Journal for Collaboration between Research and
`Clinical Practice
`
`~VOLUME 13 SUPPLEMENT 5 SEPTEMBER 1998
`
`. CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
`
`S55 DepRelief: training programme for primary care
`L Philp
`
`S59 Conclusions
`C.G. Gottfries
`
`:r;,-
`
`lnteriwtional Clinical Psychopharmacology is col'ered in Index Medicus/MEDUNE,
`Current Awareness in Biological Sciences (CABS), Current Contents/Life Sciences,
`Science Citation Index, SciSearch, Biosis, Research Alert, Excerpta Medica/EM BASE
`and Psychological Abstracts and PsyciNFO Database. International Clinical PSYcho-
`.
`pharmacology is available on CD-ROM via ADONIS.
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 004
`
`

`
`International Clinical Psychopharmacology 1998, 13 (suppl 5):S45-S47
`
`Differences in interactions of SSRis
`
`K. Bmsen
`
`Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Medical Biology, Odense University,
`Winslowsparken 19, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.
`
`The SSRis differ fmm each other with regard to their chemical structure, their pharmacokinetics and their potential for
`causing pharmacokinctic interactions through inhibition of species of the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Cytochrome
`P-t50 (C\'P) is a gnmp of more than 30 different heme containing proteins in humans, some of which play a key role in the
`oxidation and hence the elimination of numerous drugs, including the SSRis. Thus tlumxamine, but not citalopram, tluoxetine,
`paroxctinc and scrtralinc is a potent inhbitor of CYPIA2. Accordingly tluvoxamine has interactions with other drugs elimi(cid:173)
`nated by CYP 1A2 including caffeine, clozapine, olanzapine, theophylline, propranolol and tacrine. CYP2Cl9 is the source of
`the S-mcphcnytoin oxidation polymorphism. About 2% of whites are poor metabolizers in whom CYP2C19 is not expressed.
`Poor mctaholizcrs have an impaired elimination of among other drugs citalopram.Aithough not metabolized by CYP2C19,
`llumxaminc is still a potent inhibitor of the enzyme. The same applies to tluoxetine. CYP2D6 only makes up about 2-5% of
`the total P-150 in the human liver, hut anyway is the major enzyme catalyzing more than 30 clinically used drugs including all
`of the tric)-clic antidepressants, several neuroleptics, opiates, betablockers, antiarrhythmics and among the SSRis N(cid:173)
`desmcth)·Icitalopram, fluvoxamine, tluoxetine and paroxetine but not sertraline.AII of the SSRis inhibit CYP2D6 but tluoxetine,
`norlluoxctinc and pamxctinc arc particularly potent inhibitors. CYP3A4 is the most abundant human cytochrome P450, but
`most of the SSRis with the exception of nortluoxetine do not inhibit this enzyme, and interactions with SSRis and CYP3A4
`appear not to IJC a significant. lnt Clin p,)ch<>pharmacol 13 ('uppl5t:S.J5-S.J7 <D 1998 Lippincott William' & Wilkin'
`
`Keywords: cytochrome P450. drug-drug interactions, CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2Cl9, CYP2D6, CYP2El, CYP3A4
`
`An interaction is defined as an unwanted change in the
`action of a drug on the organism (pharmacodynamics)
`and/or an unwanted change in the action of the organ(cid:173)
`ism on a drug (pharmacokinetics) due to the previous
`or concomitant intake of another drug. The true inci(cid:173)
`dence of interactions in the population is not known,
`but based on data from studies of drug related hospi(cid:173)
`tal admissions it is reasonable to assume, that the fig(cid:173)
`ure is low (Hallas, 1995). Hence interactions are prob(cid:173)
`ably not a major health problem, although the
`importance in individual patients can be great.
`By tradition, interactions are classified according to
`their mechanism into pharmacodynamic, pharmaco(cid:173)
`kinetic and pharmaceutical. A pharmacodynamic in(cid:173)
`teraction may arise from the concomitant administra(cid:173)
`tion of two drugs that affect the same receptor,
`neurotransmittor or physiological system. For instance
`the SSRis all share the same important pharmacody(cid:173)
`namic property, the inhibition of the serotonin trans(cid:173)
`porter. Thereby, the concentration of serotonin is el(cid:173)
`evated in the synaptic cleft. The so-called serotonin
`syndrome may occur if an SSRI is administered to(cid:173)
`gether with a drug that either via the same or a differ(cid:173)
`ent mechanism also increases the serotonin concentra-
`
`tion. A pharmacokinetic interaction is an interaction
`where the plasma concentration of one drug is changed
`without change of dose because another drug is given
`simultaneously. The plasma concentration may in(cid:173)
`crease due to an increase in the absorption fraction,
`inhibition of the biotransformation, impairment of the
`renal excretion or disappearance of induction. Con(cid:173)
`versely, the plasma concentration may decrease be(cid:173)
`cause of a decrease in the absorption fraction, induc(cid:173)
`tion of the biotransformation, enhancement of the re(cid:173)
`nal excretion or the disappearance of impairment of
`the elimination.
`The clinical relevance of an interaction is deter(cid:173)
`mined by several factors: (1) The frequency and rel(cid:173)
`evance of the combination of the two drugs. (2) The
`frequency of the interaction during combined intake
`of the two drugs. (3) The therapeutic index which
`means the ratio between the lower toxic and the lower
`therapeutic level is low. ( 4) Clinical dose titration is
`not feasible. (5) The patient population.
`The clinical consequence of an interaction may ei(cid:173)
`ther be an enhancement of an adverse effect or an en(cid:173)
`hancement of the drug's desired effect. Alternatively
`the consequence may be a weakening of the desired
`
`0268-1315 ([) 1998 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
`
`International Clinical Psychopharmacology 1998, Vol 13 (suppl 5) S45
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 005
`
`

`
`effect but only very rarely an interaction shows a quali(cid:173)
`tative change in the known effects of a drug. Hence
`interactions can nearly always be predicted and avoided
`by rational use of the drugs known pharmacological
`characteristics. An interaction observed in one patient
`does not necessarily mean that all patients will suffer
`from the interaction when treated with the combina(cid:173)
`tion of the two drugs. Likewise, it is difficult to ex(cid:173)
`trapolate from animals to humans and as clearly illus(cid:173)
`trated by the SSRis an interaction caused by one drug
`does not mean, that all drugs from the same class share
`the interaction.
`When the SSRis were introduced about 10 years
`ago, very little was known about their interaction pro(cid:173)
`file. During the postmarketing surveillance this turned
`out to be a major feature distinguishing the SSRis.
`Hence at clinically equivalent doses, their efficacy and
`adverse effect profile show no clinically relevant dif(cid:173)
`ferences. The SSRis clearly differ in 3 ways, and that
`is with regard to their chemical structure, their phar(cid:173)
`macokinetics and their potential for drug-drug inter(cid:173)
`actions. The two former aspects are only of marginal
`clinical relevance. Here focus will be on the interac(cid:173)
`tions.
`In this context, the cytochrome P450 enzyme sys(cid:173)
`tem in the liver plays a key role. Oxidation by cyto(cid:173)
`chrome P450 is the major route of elimination for
`drugs. By oxidation, drugs are usually made less ac(cid:173)
`tive, more water soluble and most importantly, they are
`prepared for the attack by so-called phase 2 or conju(cid:173)
`gation enzymes such as glucoronyl transferases and
`sulphate transferases. A conjugated metabolite is nearly
`always inactive and very polar and hence readily
`excretable via the kidneys. In this way, the cytochrome
`P450 becomes a key in regulating the elimination of
`the majority of drugs. In humans the number of cyto(cid:173)
`chrome P450 (CYP) genes and enzymes exceeds 30,
`but a major role in drug oxidation so far only has been
`demonstrated for about 6-8 species. The enzymes are
`heme proteins, and they are grouped in families and
`subfamilies according to their amino acid similarity.
`About 3.5 billion years ago there was only one P450
`gene, and it is beleived, that this gene in the course of
`the evolution underwent gene duplications and muta(cid:173)
`tions. Hence the cytochrome P450 gene loci is spread
`on at least 6 different human chromosomes.
`Each cytochrome P450 has a very broad substrate
`specificity, and co-administration of two substrates for
`the same enzyme is common in clinical practice. Due
`to competition for the active site this may lead to clini(cid:173)
`cally important interactions. A cytochrome P450 based
`interaction is likely to become important if a drugs,
`which is almost exclusively eliminated by a single cy(cid:173)
`tochrome P450 is co-administered with another drug
`
`BR0SEN
`
`which is a potent or an effective inhibitor of the P450
`in question. Besides, the therapeutic index of the
`substrate should be low, and clinical dose-titration
`should not be feasible.
`The cytochrome P450 I A2 (CYP I A2) is an induc(cid:173)
`ible P450 that on average makes up 10-15% of the
`total P450 in the human liver. CYP I A2 is induced by
`tobacco smoking and charcoalbroiled meat and very
`weakly by omeprazole. It oxidizes caffeine, theophyl(cid:173)
`line, tacrine, clozapine, olanzapine, propranolol, and
`it is partially involved in the oxidation of amitriptyl(cid:173)
`ine, clomipramine and imipramine. It is very potently
`inhibited by fluvoxamine and methoxsalen. Neither
`citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine or sertraline inhibit
`CYPlA2 to any important degree. Thus clinically im(cid:173)
`portant interactions have been reported between
`fluvoxamine and caffeine, clozapine, theophylline and
`tacrine. It is possible to co-administer fluvoxamine with
`these drugs provided that their dose is reduced to 10-
`30% of the normal. Whenever possible plasma levels
`should be monitored.
`CYP2C9 is another quantitatively important cyto(cid:173)
`chrome P450, although its role in the oxidation of psy(cid:173)
`chotropic drugs has not yet been established. So far
`systematic studies on the inhibition of CYP2C9 by
`SSRis have not been carried out. It is the main cyto(cid:173)
`chrome P450 oxidating S-warfarin, and there is a theo(cid:173)
`retical possibility, that the augmentation of anticoagu(cid:173)
`lant effect during warfarin treatment with concomitant
`fluvoxamine may be due to inhibition of CYP2C9.
`Other important substrates of CYP2C9 include pheny(cid:173)
`toin, tolbutamide, diclofenac and other non-steroidal
`anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). CYP2Cl9 is the
`source of the so-called S-mephenytoin oxidation poly(cid:173)
`morphism in humans. In whites, the enzyme is not ex(cid:173)
`pressed in 2-3% of the population, the so-called poor
`metabolizers. The frequency of poor metabolizers is
`much higher, 15-20% in Orientals. CYP2C 19 is an
`important enzyme catalyzing
`the oxidation of
`citalopram, clomipramine, diazepam, imipramine,
`moclobemide, proguanil and omeprazole. Interestingly,
`citalopram which is partially N-demethylated to
`desmethylcitalopram via CYP2C 19 does not inhibit the
`enzyme at clinical doses. However, fluvoxamine,
`which apparently is not metabolized by CYP2Cl9 but
`by CYPl A2 and CYP2D6 (see below) is a very po(cid:173)
`tent inhbitor of the enzyme. This may have a bearing
`on the combination of tluvoxamine and the antimalar(cid:173)
`ial drug proguanil. Proguanil is a prodrug that requires
`oxidation to the active metabolite cycloguanil. The for(cid:173)
`mation of cycloguanil is pre-dominatly catalyzed by
`CYP2C 19 (Jeppesen eta/., 1997). Hence cycloguanil
`formation is much slower in the poor metabolizers than
`in the extensive metabolizers, and in the latter it drops
`
`S46
`
`International Clinical Psychopharmacology 1998, Vol 13 (suppl 5)
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 006
`
`

`
`DIFFERENCES IN INTERACTIONS OF SSRI
`
`to the poor metabolizer level during fluvoxamine in(cid:173)
`take (2). Accordingly the combination of the two drugs
`is not recommended.
`Although CYP2D6 only makes up about 2-5% of
`the total P450 in the human liver it is a major enzyme
`catalyzing the oxidation of more than 30 drugs. The
`list includes all of the tricyclic antidepressants, sev(cid:173)
`eral neuroleptics, beta-adrenoceptor blockers and many
`opioids including codeine and tramadol. It should now
`be clear, that CYP2D6 substrates either have the heart
`or the brain as their effector organs. However the as(cid:173)
`sociation between the mode and place of action and
`the affinity for CYP2D6 is not fully understood.
`CYP2D6 is not expressed in 7% of whites, and this is
`due to mutations in the CYP2D6 gene. Up to now at
`least 20 different mutations or gene deletions have been
`identified, some of which are more frequent than oth(cid:173)
`ers in the poor metabolizers. Another important char(cid:173)
`acteristic of CYP2D6 is, that the enzyme is the source
`of important drug-drug interactions. Thus quinidine,
`pro-pafenone, several neuroleptics and some SSRis are
`very potent inhibitors of CYP2D6. In fact, all SSRis
`inhbit CYP2D6, but fluoxetine, norfluoxetine and
`paroxetine are particularly potent. Thus at the usual
`therapeutic doses of citalopram, fluvoxamine and
`sertraline, it is unlikely that clinically important drug(cid:173)
`drug interactions occur in combination with CYP2D6
`substrates, but with fluoxetine and paroxetine is usu(cid:173)
`ally recommended that doses of the substrate are re(cid:173)
`duced to about 25-50% of the standard dose.
`
`CYP2El only has a marginal role for the oxidation
`of drugs, and in vitro studies have shown, that no SSRI
`inhibits the enzyme to any important degree. CYP3A4
`is quantitatively and probably also qualitatively the
`most important cytochrome P450 enzyme in humans.
`Interestingly the enzyme is expressed also in the gut
`mucosa. The enzyme is inhibited by ketoconazole,
`itraconazole, erythromycin and also by the protease
`inhibitors used in the treatment of AIDS.
`The SSRis have taught the pharmaceutical industry,
`the regulatory authorities and the prescribing physicians
`a lesson. The SSRis are probably (hopefully?) the last
`class of very important drugs that was not character(cid:173)
`ized with regard to CYP interactions by the time they
`were launched (Bn;;sen and Buur Rasmussen, 1996).
`
`REFERENCES
`Bnllsen K and Buur Rasmussen B (1996). Selective serot(cid:173)
`onin reuptake inhibitors: Pharmacokinetics and drug in(cid:173)
`teractions. In Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors.
`Advances in basic research and clinical practice, Second
`edition. (Feighner J and Boyer WP eds.) UK: John
`Wiley&Sons. pp. 87-108.
`Hallas J (1995). Drug related hospital admissions in
`subspecialities of internal medicine. Doctoral Thesis,
`Odense University, Denmark. La:geforeningens Forlag,
`Copenhagen, Denmark.
`Jeppesen U, Buur Rasmussen B and Brsz;sen K (1997).
`Fluvoxamine inhibits the CYP2Cl9 catalyzed
`bioactivation of proguanil. Clin Pharmacal Ther 62:279-
`86.
`
`International Clinical Psychopharmacology 1998, Vo\13 (supp\5) S47
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 007

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket