throbber
Measurements of Spectral Emission and Absorption of a High
`Pressure Xenon Arc in the Stationary and the Flashed Modes
`
`Lothar Klein
`
`Concurrently with emission measurements of a high pressure xenon a1'c in the spectral range 3000 A to 2 1.4,
`its absorption in the ir was measured by a technique based on modulating the less intense radiation of a
`carbon are used as background source. The emission measurements were repeated with a rapid scanning
`spectrometer while flashing the xenon are for 0.1 sec at 10 kW, which is five times the normal power input.
`The are showed excellent stability and reproducibility both in the stationary and the flashed modes. The
`intensity increase of the continuum was proportional to the increase of power input during the flash. A
`simple expression was derived connecting the spectral radiance of the continuum directly with the tem-
`perature and pressure of the arc. The temperature profile of the xenon arc was obtained using this ex-
`pression and also by applying the Pla.nck—Kirchhoff method to the Abel inverted emission and absorption of
`an ir xenon line. Both approaches show fair agreement at the arc center. The wavelength dependence
`of the correction factor for departures from hydrogenic behavior of the xenon continuum was derived from
`the measured spectral radiances and compared with theoretical calculations.
`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`
`Emission spectra are extensively used in plasma
`diagnostics, but only rarely is the absorption of arc
`plasmas measured quantitatively. One reason seems
`to be the widely held opinion that are plasmas at
`atmospheric pressure viewed over short optical paths
`are always optically thin, except for the resonance lines.
`Another reason is the difficulty of finding a suitable
`background source
`for
`absorption measurements.
`Laboratory plasmas,
`typically at 10,000°K are so
`much brighter than the brightest light sources com-
`monly available (e.g., carbon arc or tungsten strip
`lamp),
`that the latter are unsuitable. Finally,
`the
`methods for deriving the radial distribution of emission
`and absorption coefficients of optically thick arc
`plasmas from line-of—sight measurements have been
`slow to develop, and this has limited the value of ab-
`sorption spectra for plasma diagnostics. Freeman and
`Katz were the first to obtain a practical solution for the
`Abel inversion of plasmas with self—absorption,1 but a
`more general approach was only recently found by
`Elder et al.2 Elder el al. also derived the radial tem-
`
`perature profile by the Planck-Kirchhoff method from
`the Abel inverted emission—absorption measurements.
`To demonstrate their method, Elder et al. used a plasma
`seeded with sodium and determined the temperature
`from a sodium resonance line. The peak temperature
`
`The author is with the Warner & Swasey Company, Control
`Instrument Division, Flushing, New York 1 1354.
`Received 10 October 1967.
`
`was below 3000°K, which is not typical for a laboratory
`plasma.
`Tourin3 found that the strong ir lines of argon can
`become optically thick (self-absorbing) at atmospheric
`pressure. He measured the absorption by a technique
`based on modulating the radiation from the back-
`ground source;
`thus, absorption measurements can be
`made even when the intensity of the plasma is higher
`than the intensity of the background source. For the
`measurements reported in Ref. 3 a tungsten strip lamp
`could be used, because the mismatch of intensities in
`their is less than at shorter wavelengths.
`If absorption
`measurements of plasmas are to be extended into the
`visible or uv regions of the spectrum, however, a much
`brighter light source has to be used.
`The high pressure xenon arc appears to have the
`desired characteristics. Since the early measurements
`of Baum and Dunkelmanf‘ its strong continuum in the
`uv and visible part of the spectrum is known to be
`considerably more intense than the radiation from the
`carbon arc. Goncz and l\'ewell’s"’ recent work with
`
`stationary and flashed xenon arcs covers a more ex-
`tended spectral
`range. However,
`their data were
`obtained by measuring the spectral
`irradiance from
`these arcs and are therefore of limited value for a back-
`
`ground source evaluation, where the spectral radiance
`of the brightest part of the arc is the parameter‘ of
`interest. The peak temperature of a high pressure
`xenon arc has been determined by Kopec“ from wave-
`length scans of two ir lines, using Bartels’ method’ to
`estimate the peak temperature of an inhomogeneous
`plasma from line—of—sight emission measurements of
`lines showing self-reversal.
`
`April 1958 / Vol. 7, N0. 4 / APPLIED OPTICS 677
`
`
`ASML 1231ASML 1231
`(cid:34)(cid:52)(cid:46)(cid:45)(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:19)
`ASML 1231
`
`ASML 1231
`
`

`
`ll. Experimental
`
`The optical system used for the measurements of the
`stationary arc is shown schematically in Fig. 1. The
`xenon lamp housing was mounted on a linear drive
`table for traversing the arc laterally to the optical axis
`with a precision of 0.01 mm. Through circular open-
`ings in the lamp housing on the two sides along the
`optical axis, light from the background source could be
`focused on the xenon arc, and the light emerging from
`the arc was collected by the foreoptics and focused on
`the entrance slit of the monochromator. For emission
`
`measurements of the arc in the stationary mode, a
`chopper placed in front of the entrance slit was used;
`for absorption measurements another chopper modu-
`lated only the radiation from the background source.
`By synchronous rectification of the ac signal from the
`detector, absorption was measured without interference
`from the dc signal due to the emission from the xenon
`are. This technique of concurrent measurement of
`emission and absorption has been described in greater
`detail by Tourin.”
`into units of
`The conversion of detector output
`spectral radiance was achieved by calibration against a
`tungsten strip lamp, done in two steps. A tungsten
`strip lamp, held at a constant voltage, was used as a
`reference lamp and incorporated into the foreoptics of
`the Perkin-Elmer monochromator (RL in Fig. 1). This
`type of lamp is also a standard component of the
`Warner & Swasey Model 501 rapid scanning spectrome-
`ter used in conjunction with the flashed xenon arc.
`The reference lamps can be imaged onto the entrance
`slit simply by rotating a mirror and their signal com-
`pared with the signal for the arc. This is done im-
`mediately after each measurement to eliminate errors
`due to changes in slit setting or electronic drift. From
`time to time the reference lamp is checked,
`in turn,
`against another strip lamp, which is positioned at the
`same location as the arc and whose spectral radiance is
`determined,
`following standard practice,
`from its
`
`Fig. 1. Optical system used for concurrent measurements of
`emission and absorption of the stationary xenon arc.
`
`EM. CHOP.
`
`The absorption of a xenon arc has been measured by
`Rovinskii and RazumtseVa,3 using another xenon arc
`as a background source. They determined the plasma
`to be optically thick, but, because of the use of inter-
`ference filters
`instead of a monochromator,
`their
`measurements were of poor spectral resolution and
`limited to three wavelength bands in the visible.
`It was the primary purpose of the work described
`here to measure by a refined technique the spectral
`absorption of the high pressure xenon arc and, simul-
`taneously, its emission. The temperature could then
`be derived by the Planck-Kirchhoff method. Local
`values for homogeneous zones of
`the plasma were
`obtained by Abel inversion, applying the technique of
`Elder el. (11.3 to the absorption measurements. A con-
`sistency check was made by comparing the temperature
`profile of the are obtained by the Planck-Kirchhoff
`method with the temperature profile derived inde-
`pendently from the emission measurements of the con-
`tinuum using the modified Kramers-Unsoeld theory.
`Since the xenon plasma is optically thick, recourse to
`seeding as in the work reported in Ref. 2 was unneces-
`sary. Because of its high electron density, the xenon
`plasma can be expected to be in strict local thermo-
`dynamic
`equilibrium.
`Thus,
`these measurements
`should provide a good case for comparing the emission—
`absorption method with established diagnostic tech-
`»niques for plasmas based only on emission.
`Concurrently with this program, the spectral radi-
`ance measurements were used to evaluate the xenon
`
`are as a background source for absorption measure-
`ments of plasmas. We selected a commercially avail-
`able high pressure xenon arc* since, as a distinct
`advantage, this lamp can be flashed at ten times the
`normal power input for pulse durations of the order of a
`tenth of a second. The increase of spectral radiance
`was measured with a rapid scanning spectrometer de-
`veloped in this laboratory.T
`
`* Hanovia 4101039.
`
`1‘ Warner & Swasey Model 501 rapid scanning spectrometer.
`
`Fig. 2. Zones of ditferent brightness in the high pressure xenon
`arc:
`(1) cathode spot, (2) are plasma, (3) red halo.
`
`678 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 7, No. 4 / April 1958
`
`6
`
`

`
`temperature accurately measured with an optical
`pyrometer.
`It has been our experience that this pro-
`cedure increases the ease of intensity measurements
`without loss of accuracy.
`The image of the xenon are projected on a screen
`appears to the eye as shown in Fig. 2. A small area of
`intense brightness—the cathode spot—~is discernible
`within the bell-shaped arc plasma. A dim reddish
`glow partially envelopes the cathode and extends from
`the cathode to the round tip of the anode. This phe-
`nomenon to which no reference in the literature could be
`found, is called here red halo.
`It has the characteristic
`of being asymmetric with respect to the arc axis and
`this asymmetry appeared always at the same location
`when the arc was started. When the arc is turned off,
`the red halo does not disappear instantly as does the
`bright central arc region, but persists over several
`seconds. We believe that it originates from convec-
`tively heated xenon gas streaming upwards from the
`white hot cathode.
`
`Our measurements were made in a horizontal plane
`through the arc containing the cathode spot, i.e., the
`hottest region of the xenon plasma. The entrance slit
`of both the spectrometers used was masked to a height
`of 0.25 mm, since spatial scanning of the arc in the
`Vertical direction had shown that near the center, i.e.,
`in the region of major interest, intensity gradients over
`this length were still small.
`In the stationary mode the arc was run at a current of
`100 A at 22.5 V. A welder rectifier with line voltage
`compensator and ripple filter* proved to be a con-
`venient and stable power supply. By displaying the
`output of the two detectors (1P21 and PbS) on an
`oscilloscope, the ac ripple of the light intensity was
`measured to be less than 2% in both cases.
`If started
`from cold, the arc reached a stable regime in about 5
`min, then the long term drift measured over 30 min was
`of the order of 1% for the peak of Xe I0 9923 A, and
`less than 5% for the continuum at 5000 A. When the
`arc was extinguished and restarted with the current
`control of the rectifier at a fixed position, spatial scan-
`ning of the arc proved that the cathode spot always
`formed at exactly the same location with very good
`repeatability of light intensity (typically to within 2%
`for the peak of Xe I 9923 A).
`It is standard practice to use a condenser discharge
`for flashing the xenon arc”;
`the total pulse duration
`is then at most of the order of a few milliseconds. To
`make the flashed xenon arc useful as an extremely
`bright source for absorption measurements in con-
`junction with modern fast scanning spectrometers, a
`different
`approach was
`followed. A water—cooled
`stainless steel tube was used as a resistor capable of
`dissipating a high load and was connected to the
`rectifier in parallel with the xenon arc.
`In the simmer-
`ing mode, 100 A flowed through the xenon arc and
`450 A through the parallel resistor. A power switch
`was used to flash the are by manually opening the
`
`EMISSION
`..__J
`
`7°
`“‘ABSORPT|0N
`ZERO LINE
`
`Fig. 3. Strip chart record for emission—absorption measurements
`of the cathode spot of the xenon arc. The gain was 20 for the
`emission and 350 for the I0 and absorption scans. Slit width:
`30 p.
`
`showed that
`resistor circuit. Oscilloscope displays
`after a fast rise time of the order of a few milliseconds,
`constant lamp current and voltage, i.e., a steady state,
`was achieved for the duration of the flash (typically
`100 msec). For our measurements we flashed the
`lamp at 10 kW, although double this power is still
`permissible.
`
`Ill. Measurements
`
`A. Stationary Mode
`A Perkin-Elmer Model 98 monochromator was used
`and the detector (IP21 tube or PbS) output displayed
`on a strip chart recorder. Measurements were made
`in the spectral range from 3000 A to 2.7 /.6, using a glass
`prism. Absorption measurements were made with a
`carbon aI'C'f‘ as background source. We resorted to
`hand regulation of the arc since the automatic regulator
`provided by the manufacturer was not sensitive enough
`for our purpose. The carbon are operated best under
`the conditions recommended by Null and Lozier,1° with
`a 6.5—mm thick pure graphite anode and the current
`held at about 11 A just below the hissing point. The
`use of a 6—mm diam cored cathode (Norris H), however,
`gave a definite improvement in arc stability over the
`thin (3.2-mm), pure graphite rod specified by Null and
`Lozier. This is in agreement with recent observations
`by Magdeburg and Schley.”
`Since long term stability of the carbon arc could’ not
`be achieved, it proved advisable when measuring the
`lateral absorption profile, to obtain an ID reading in
`conjunction with every measurement. This was also
`indicated because of other considerations (see Sec.
`V. A). Owing to its excellent
`reproducibility,
`ex-
`tinguishing and restarting the xenon arc did not alter
`its characteristics. A typical emission and absorption
`record is shown in Fig. 3. The absorptance of Xe 1
`
`* Miller SRH—444-Cl with LVC-3.
`
`T Made by Spindler & Hoyer, Goettingen, W. Germany.
`
`April 1968 / Vol. 7, No. 4 / APPLIED OPTICS 679
`
`

`
`opened. Successive scans are shifted vertically up-
`wards on the oscillogram. To test for reproducibility,
`the xenon arc was flashed two more times after an
`
`interval of a few seconds, and all spectra were recorded
`on the same photograph.
`In Fig. 4, each set of three
`superimposed traces appears as one trace, and all nine
`scans are identical. Thus, it is proved that the radi-
`ation from the xenon arc remains constant during a
`flash, and that there is excellent flash-to-flash reproduci-
`bility. The same results were obtained for two spectral
`ranges in the near ir from 7000 A to 1.9 [45 When the
`experiment was repeated in the uv (3000 A to 4200 A)
`we detected a variation in radiant output during a
`flash of less than 5%.
`Because of the excellent shot-to-shot reproducibility,
`it was possible to obtain a measure of the plasma ab-
`sorptance, imaging the cathode spot back on itself by
`means of a spherical mirror positioned on the optical
`axis on the opposite side of the xenon arc from the
`spectrometer. A measurement of emission alone, ob-
`tained by placing a shutter in front of the mirror
`while flashing the arc, was followed by a measurement
`of emission with added back reflection during a con-
`secutive flash. The reflection and transmission loss of
`the back-reflected light at the hot quartz envelope,
`which can be considerable,
`is difficult
`to determine.
`Therefore, measurements of absorption by this tech-
`nique are inherently inaccurate.
`It can, however, be
`determined unequivocally for which lines the absorptiop
`is very close to 100%. Thus, the core of Xe I 8232 A
`and the self—reversed peak of Xe 1 8819 A in Fig. 5 are
`black.
`
`IV. Theory
`
`the classical
`Following Unsoeld’s development of
`Kramers
`theory,
`the emission coefficient
`(spectral
`radiance per unit depth) for the combined recombina-
`tion (free—bound) and bremsstrahlung (free—free) con-
`tinuum of an optically thin plasma, expressed in
`
`Fig. 5. Wavelength scan of the emission and emission plus back
`reflection from a mirror of the cathode spot of a flashed xenon arc.
`The wavelength range 0.7-1.2 a was scanned in 10 msec using
`an RCA 7102 photomultiplier.
`
`Fig. 4. Oscillogram showing three wavelength scans for a flashed
`xenon arc. The wavelength range 4200—6500 A was scanned in 10
`msec, using an RCA 4473 photomultiplier. Three flashes are
`superimposed (total of nine scans shown).
`
`8819 A, for instance, could be accurately measured to
`be 91%, although the detector signal for the peak of
`this line is sixty times stronger than for the carbon arc
`(Io in Fig. 3).
`Because of the large number of Xe I lines in the near
`ii‘, the wavelength assignment of the lines in the spec-
`trum of the high pressure are proved to be diflicult.
`Therefore,
`the following procedure was used:
`the
`carbon arc was replaced by a mercury arc and the
`spectrometer focused at the edge of the xenon arc
`plasma, where the temperature is lower and conse-
`quently the lines are sharpe1' and match better the
`intensity of
`the mercury lines. With the emission
`chopper being used,
`the xenon and mercury spectra
`appeared simultaneously;
`an external wavelength
`standard had thus become, effectively, an internal
`standard. The increase in accuracy of wavelength
`correlation over the standard procedure based on a
`separately run reference spectrum permitted to assign
`unambiguously all spectral features of the xenon arc.
`
`B. Flashed Mode
`
`For the measurements of the flashed xenon arc the
`Warner & Swasey Model 501 rapid scanning spectrome-
`ter was used. This instrument has been described in
`detail elsewhere.” Four detectors (RCA 1P28, 4473,
`and 7102 photomultipliers, and an InAs photovoltaic
`detectpr) were used to scan the xenon spectrum from
`3000 A to 2 p,. Because of the availability of two exit
`slits, the contiguous spectral ranges for two detectors
`could be scanned simultaneously.
`The scans were displayed on oscilloscopes and re-
`corded photographically. An oscillogram of the flashed
`xenono arc spectrum in the wavelength range 4200-
`6500 A is shown in Fig. 4. For this measurement, the
`controls of the Model 501 were set for a scanning time
`of 10 msec, a repetition rate of one scan each 37.5 msec,
`and a delay of 30 msec. Thus, the start of the first scan
`occurred 30 msec, of the second 67.5 msec, and of the
`third scan 105 msec, after the flashing circuit had been
`
`680 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 7, No.4 / April 1968
`
`

`
`W cm“3p.‘1sr“‘, is given at wavelengths longer than a
`critical Wavelength Ac, by
`
`5;‘ = 1.63 X 10‘“[.§(>\)/)\2](n,,2/T3),
`
`(1)
`
`In deriving Eq. (1), it has
`with A in p. and T in °K.
`been assumed that the ionization stages beyond the
`first can be disregarded;
`then the concentration of first
`ions equals ne, the concentration of electrons (condition
`of plasma quasi—neutrality). The factor .§()\) accounts
`for departures from hydrogenic behavior and quantum
`mechanical (Gaunt) corrections. Schlueter” has calcu-
`lated g(>\) as a function of Wavelength at a temperature
`of 14,000°K, although he found this factor to be prac-
`tically temperature independent.
`In the limit of vanishing ionization, Dalton’s law and
`the Saha equation can be combined to a simple expres-
`sion for the electron density as a function of the state
`variables T and P of the plasma. With the pressure in
`atm,
`
`n, = 5.953 X 10“*(Q;/Qo)%P*T5 exp(—-E,-/2kT).
`
`(2)
`
`For a xenon plasma in the temperature range of
`9000—14000°K, an average value of 4.44 can be used for
`Q,/Q0, the ratio of the partition functions for first ions
`and neutrals, since this value is constant to within 2%
`in this range, and its pressure dependence is also very
`small.” Substituting ne from Eq. (2), with the ioniza-
`tion energy E, = 12.127 eV (Ref. 14), the emission
`coefficient for the continuum of a xenon plasma (in
`Wcm‘3/.c‘1sr“1) is given, approximately, by:
`
`“X9 = 2.57 x 107 5—;"2_) P cxp(—140,760/T).
`
`(3)
`
`In order to assess the Validity of this expression, we
`have calculated the electron density for a xenon plasma
`at 16 atm pressure, using Eq. (2) as compared with the
`electron density calculated more rigorously using
`Unsoeld’s and also Ecker and Weizel’s approach” to
`obtain the lowering of the ionization potential in a
`plasma.
`It appears
`that up to the temperature
`reached in a high pressure xenon arc (below 12,000°K),
`the departure of 17.,
`[Eq.
`(2)] from 77.,
`(Unsoeld) is
`smaller than the discrepancy between ne (Unsoeld) and
`12., (Ecker and Weizel). Since there exists no general
`agreement as to which theoretical approach gives the
`best quantitative estimate of
`the lowering of
`the
`ionization potential, the inaccuracy in ne of less than
`20% at the lower temperatures,
`introduced by the
`simplifications used in deriving Eq. (2), is of the same
`order of magnitude as the theoretical uncertainties.
`Recourse to an elaborate calculation seems therefore
`hardly to be justified, and, because of its simplicity,
`Eq. (3) is useful for obtaining the temperature directly
`from the measured emission coefficient if the pressure is
`known. The temperature derived by this method is
`quite insensitive to relatively large errors in the emis-
`sion coeflicient. Thus, it follows from Eq. (8) that an
`error of 40% results in an error of only 3% in tempera-
`ture at 11,000°K, the peak temperature of the station-
`ary xenon arc, and is still less at lower temperatures.
`
`It follows from Eq. (1) that N)9, the spectral radiance
`of the continuum measured through the center of an
`optically thin cylindrical symmetrical xenon plasma of
`radius R, is given by
`
`ATAO = fla E>‘(7,)d7, = C
`
`-3
`
`V
`
`R 7Lp2[PyT(T)l d7,‘
`
`Tl(7")
`
`-13
`
`Unlike the case of line radiation, the integral con-
`taining the temperature gradient is not a function of
`wavelength. Since the .§(>\)
`factors are practically
`temperature independent, relative experimental values
`for these factors can be obtained directly from line—of—
`sight measurements of an optically thin plasma.
`If
`the temperature profile and the pressure are known, the
`spectral radiance measurements of the continuum have
`to be inverted only for one wavelength in order to
`obtain the £(>\) at the other wavelengths Without an
`Abel
`inversion. The line-of-sight measurements are
`conveniently related to the emission coefficients at the
`center of the are by introducing the equivalent optical
`pathlength L:
`
`L E lN>.“/e>.(7‘ = 0)l-
`
`(5)
`
`From an Abel inversion at one wavelength A1, 6),,-
`(r = 0) is derived;
`thus, L can be calculated and used
`in turn to derive the emission coefficients at other Wave-
`lengths.
`inversion of cylindrically symmetrical
`The Abel
`plasmas is a straightforward procedure, provided the
`plasma is optically thin. Different numerical methods
`are available; we prefer the one proposed by Barr,”
`which combines effective smoothing of small random
`errors with ease of computation.
`If the plasma is
`optically thick, but
`its minimum measured trans-
`mittance higher than about 70—80%, a simple correc-
`tion procedure suffices. Thus, each intensity measure-
`ment has only to be divided by the square root of the
`transmittance measured along the same line of sight,
`otherwise the Abel inversion proceeds as in the optically
`thin case [see Eq. (4) in Ref. 2].
`If the transmittance is
`lower, accurate values of the radial intensity distribu-
`tion can only be obtained by iteration?
`The measurement of plasma absorption is important
`not only for correcting the emission measurements.
`If the absorption measurements are also Abel inverted,
`the radial distribution of emission and absorption can
`be used to derive the temperature profile of the plasma
`from first principles (the Planck-Kirchhoff law).
`In
`the case of strongly absorbing lines, however, Elder
`et al. in Ref. 2 point out difficulties in performing the
`Abel inversion of the measured absorption,
`if mono-
`chromators of only moderate Wavelength resolution are
`used.
`In effect, for large variations of transmittance
`over the spectral slit Width Au, the approximation used,
`
`log L r(.,)d.,) 2 i L log-r(v)du,
`
`(6)
`
`is valid only if the transmittance 'r(v) is larger than
`about 70% forall frequencies in the internal Au.
`
`April 1968 / Vol. 7, No.4 / APPLIED OPTICS 681
`
`

`
`TEMPERATUREIN1ooo°K
`
`ARC RADIUS
`
`(mm)
`
`Fig. 6. Radial temperature profile of the cathode spot of the 2.?
`kW xenon arc (stationary mode), as obtained from the emission
`coefficient of the continuum at 1.31 p. (solid line), and by the
`Planck-Kirchhoff method from the emission—absorption profile of
`Xe I 10528 K (broken line).
`
`V. Results and Discussion
`
`A. Radial Temperature Distribution of the
`Stationary Xenon Arc
`
`The large discrepancy in intensity between the xenon
`and carbon are at the shorter Wavelengths limited the
`absorption measurements to the ir region of the spec-
`trum. The accuracy of
`these measurements is im-
`paired, however, by two effects. VVhen the xenon arc
`is in operation, its quartz envelope becomes red hot
`with a marked increase of absorption in the ir. Sec-
`ondly, the red halo also shows noticeable absorption in
`the ir and its asymmetry causes an asymmetrical
`absorption profile. Taking advantage of the persis-
`tence of the red halo (see Sec. II), it proved to be advis-
`able to include the absorption of the hot quartz enve-
`lope and the red halo in the I0 reading by recording the
`signal for the carbon arc radiation at the instant when
`the xenon arc was extinguished. Even so, the accuracy
`of
`the absorption measurements, especially for low
`absorption near the boundary of the cathode spot, was
`considerably less than the accuracy of the emission
`measurements.
`In the emission measurements, a per-
`fectly symmetrical intensity distribution proved the
`plasma core to be cylindrical symmetrical. As ex-
`pected from theory, the curves giving the lateral in-
`tensity distribution of the continuum, normalized at
`peak intensity, were identical at all wavelengths
`measured.
`
`The Abel inversion requires the measurements to be
`cut off at a fixed distance from the arc center, where the
`intensity has gone to zero. Since the region of interest
`was the hot core of the arc (cathode spot), the boundary
`of the plasma was drawn somewhat arbitrarily at the
`point Where the intensity had dropped to 1% of its peak
`value. The intensity of the red halo was of this mag-
`nitude and its contribution to the total radiance was
`thus roughly subtracted. The resulting arc diameter
`was 4.6 mm. The radial
`temperature profile was
`derived by the Planck-Kirchhoff method from the
`
`682 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 7, No.4 / April 1968
`
`radial emission and absorption profiles of Xe I 10528 A,
`obtained by inverting the lateral emission and absorp-
`tion measurements of this line. This line was selected
`because its peak absorption Was 28.5% when measured
`with a spectral slit width which was small compared
`with the line width;
`the true peak absorption was
`therefore still not high enough to lead to difliculties in
`the inversion of the measured absorption or to make
`laborious iterations unavoidable.
`If the absorption is
`too low, the results become very sensitive to measure-
`ment errors. The continuum was therefore not used
`to derive the temperature profile, but its absorption was
`measured to correct the emission data for self-absorp-
`tion.
`In Fig. 6,
`the Planck-Kirchhoff temperature
`profile from the xenon line is compared with the tem-
`perature profile derived from the radial emission co-
`efficients of the continuum at 1.31 M by application of
`Eq. (3). The working pressure indicated by the lamp
`manufacturer (16 atm) and the £(>\) value taken from
`Ref. 13 were substituted in this equation.
`As expected,
`the two temperature profiles agree
`fairly well near the center of the arc, where the experi-
`mental accuracy is higher and diverge toward the
`periphery. Since the measurement of low intensity is
`inherently more accurate than the measurement of low
`absorption, more credence is given in this region to the
`temperature profile derived from the corrected con-
`tinuum intensity.
`It is noteworthy that the tempera-
`ture gradient appears
`to have a constant value
`(1600°K/mm)
`from close to the arc center to the
`periphery.
`From the inverted emission coefficient e(>\ = 1.31 ].l.,
`1- = O), the equivalent optical path length as defined by
`Eq. (5) is calculated to be L = 0.14 cm. To a good
`approximation, the spatially averaged spectral radiance
`N)5’ of the continuum at other wavelengths obtained by
`line-of-sight measurements through the arc center is
`therefore equivalent
`to the emission coefficient of a
`homogeneous xenon plasma of 0.14-cm diam at
`11,050°K and 16 atm. Using Eq. (3), the correction
`factors .§(>\) can then be related directly to the measured
`spectral radiance N(0:
`
`N).° = 178[.E()\)/X2].
`
`(7)
`
`The £(>\) values derived from our measurements of the
`stationary xenon arc are plotted on Fig. 7 and compared
`with correction factors calculated from theory by
`
`Fig. 7. Experimental .§(>\) factors for the xenon continuum com-
`pared with calculated values:
`(1) This paper, (2) Schlueter,“
`(3) Biberman et all“
`
`

`
`Table I. Emission and Absorption Measurements and Aver-
`age Temperature (Planck-Kirchhoff) of the Cathode Spot of the
`Xenon Arc in the Stationary Mode
`
`O
`MA)
`
`8232
`8500
`8819 (peak)
`(wing)
`
`9800
`9923
`10528
`11742
`12623
`13100
`14733
`15418
`
`Xe I
`
`Xe I
`
`Xe I
`Xe I
`Xe I
`Xe I
`Xe I
`cont
`Xe I
`Xe I
`
`NM
`(W cm’?
`Sr“ 1:“)
`
`Absorp-
`tion
`(%)
`
`5,900
`1,615
`4,390
`4,960
`3,400
`3,340
`892
`906
`640
`213
`575
`317
`
`89
`23
`97
`90
`89
`90
`28 ..
`42.;
`37
`17
`55
`37
`
`T (°K)
`
`10,020
`10,750
`9,160
`10,500
`9,820
`9,840
`9,950
`9,400
`9,920
`8,870
`10,060
`9,840
`
`Fig. 8. Wavelength scan in the range 0.7-1.2 pa for the stationary
`(lower trace) and flashed xenon are (both at same gain and with
`0.1-mm slit widths) and the reference tungsten strip lamp (1—mm
`slit widths).
`
`Biberman at al.” and by Schlueter, 13 as taken from Fig. 4
`of Ref. 13.
`It can be seen that the general shape of
`Schlueter’s curve is borne out by our experimental
`values, although the peak in the visible appears shifted
`toward the red. While the relative values of the
`experimental 50) appear well established, this is not
`true for the absolute values in view of the uncertainties
`in the plasma pressure, which could not be measured.
`Since we substituted Schlueter’s value for £(1.31 p.) in
`Eq. (3), the curve of the experimental correction factors
`has been obtained essentially by normalizing for the
`$(1.31 p.) value given by Schlueter.
`
`B. Line-of-Slight Measurements
`of the Xenon Arc
`
`In Table I, the emission—absorption data for repre-
`sentative ir lines and continua are presented, corre-
`sponding to line—of—sight measurements through the
`center of the stationary xenon arc.
`
`The tabulated temperatures have been derived by the
`Planck—Kirchhofl method from the measured peak
`emission and absorption and are not dependent on the
`slit
`function of
`the spectrometer.” Although the
`tabulated temperatures are only average temperatures,
`because of the temperature gradient along the line of
`sight, these average temperatures are weighted strongly
`toward the center of the arc and are only about 10%
`lower than the peak temperature. Since all measured
`lines originate from closely spaced high lying states, an
`influence of the upper energy level on the average
`temperature is not apparent.
`It is shown, evident,
`however, that strongly absorbing lines give a lower
`temperature. This effect
`is shown clearly for Xe I
`8819 A, whose self—reversed center is almost black and
`gives a lower temperature than the false peak in the
`Wing. The self—reversal of this line increases markedly
`at the higher temperatures of the flashed arc as shown
`on Fig. 8. While only Xe I 8819 A appears self-
`reversed in our spectra of the stationary and flashed
`are, four lines become black in the center when the arc
`is flashed. The peaks of these lines lie on the blackbody
`curve for 11,300°K as shown on Fig. 9 where the spec-
`tral radiance of the stationary and flashed xenon arc
`has been plotted against wavelength. From the
`measured radiance and this temperature (11,300°K),
`.a..value for the absorption was calculated for the other
`lines and these Values are consistent with the reflection
`data.
`It appears, therefore, that also for the flashed
`xenon are all ir lines give essentially the same average
`Planck-Kirchhoff temperature.
`The temperature increase during the flash is borne
`out by the strong enhancement ofothe only ion line in
`the scanned spectrum (Xe II 5292 A).
`In contrast, the
`strong, self-absorbed atomic lines in the ir have only
`double the intensity of the same lines in the stationary
`arc. The intensity increase of
`the continuum is
`around 44.5 times, matching closely the increase of
`electrical power input.
`It appears plausible for rough estimates to attribute
`the intensity increase of the continuum to an inc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket