throbber
T E C H N O L O G Y N E W S
`
`ARM and Intel
`Battle over the
`Mobile Chip’s
`Future
`
`Brad Smith
`
`D uring the past few years,
`
`the lines between tra-
`ditional computers and
`mobile devices have been
`blurring. Users work
`with products such as Apple’s iPhone
`and Research in Motion’s Black-
`Berry to access the Web, send and
`receive e-mail, compose documents,
`shoot and view video, and download
`applications, not just make calls.
`Meanwhile, wireless consumer-
`electronics products such as per-
`sonal-navigation and gaming devices
`are increasingly accessing the Inter-
`net for various tasks, such as retriev-
`ing mapping information and partic-
`ipating in multiplayer games.
`Thus, mobile devices are perform-
`ing many more computing-related
`tasks than in the past, which places
`additional demands on the chips that
`run them. While doing this work
`requires mobile processors that pro-
`vide high performance, they also
`must manage and conserve power
`so that they won’t quickly drain
`devices’ batteries.
`ARM Ltd. has dominated the
`mobile-chip market for about 10
`years. The company doesn’t make
`processors but instead designs
`cores, CPUs, and microprocessor
`architectures and licenses them to
`manufacturers.
`As vendors have given mobile
`devices more functionality, the chip
`makers’ approach has been to sur-
`
`round an ARM core with a series of
`specialized chips that either acceler-
`ate functions such as video render-
`ing or handle specialized tasks like
`memory caching.
`Now, Intel, which rules the PC-
`and laptop-chip worlds, plans to
`challenge ARM, in recognition
`that mobile devices have become an
`attractive market, far outselling PCs
`and laptops.
`Unlike ARM, Intel is putting most
`functionality on a single chip, as it
`does with PC and laptop chips, rather
`than using separate pieces of silicon
`to enhance a core’s capabilities.
`This approach reflects Intel’s
`approach of trying to give mobile
`devices the power of small PCs,
`according to Pankaj Kedia, director
`of global ecosystem programs for
`Intel’s Ultra Mobility Group.
`ARM, on the other hand, is try-
`ing to keep mobile devices working
`in ways that people like now, while
`adding functionality but not sacri-
`ficing battery life, said Bob Morris,
`the company’s director of mobile
`computing.
`
`In essence, ARM and its partners
`are trying to build more powerful
`handheld computing devices, while
`Intel is trying to make a handheld
`PC based on the company’s x86
`architecture.
`This has set up a battle between
`two market leaders and their differ-
`ent ways of looking at the new world
`of smart mobile devices.
`
`A TAle of Two ApproAches
`The key to designing chips for
`today’s smart mobile devices is pro-
`viding high performance, multifunc-
`tionality, and low power consump-
`tion. This applies not only to smart
`phones but also to the relatively new
`ultramobile PCs (UMPCs) and soon-
`to-be-released, somewhat smaller
`mobile Internet devices (MIDs).
`There are two main approaches to
`accomplishing these goals.
`
`ArM’s model
`The leading mobile-chip makers
`include Freescale Semiconductor,
`Qualcomm, Samsung Semiconduc-
`tor, STMicroelectronics, and Texas
`Instruments (TI). Each licenses
`ARM’s chip architecture and builds
`its own processors, adding radios for
`communications, coprocessors, and
`some circuitry of its own design.
`At its most basic, the ARM archi-
`tecture is a 32-bit, reduced-instruc-
`tion-set-computing CPU design. The
`devices in today’s high-end smart
`phones use the ARM version 5 or 6
`instruction set and have clock rates
`from 400 MHz to 1 GHz, com-
`pared to typical new laptop chips’
`minimum 2.1 GHz. They consume
`a maximum of about 300 milliwatts,
`while laptops use 15 to 35 watts just
`in idle mode.
`popularity. Last year, about 3
`billion ARM-based chips shipped
`worldwide. Will Strauss, chief ana-
`lyst for market-research firm For-
`ward Concepts, estimated that 99
`percent of the world’s smart phones,
`and all new ones, use ARM-based
`technology. He said the other 1 per-
`cent use an Infineon Technologies
`core. ARM chips are also widely
`
`Published by the IEEE Computer Society
`
`May 2008
`
`15
`
`1
`
`ASSA 1017
`
`

`
`T E C H N O L O G Y N E W S
`
`used in consumer electronics such as
`personal media players, he said.
`New functionality. As smart
`phones have added capabilities, chip
`makers have had to include dedi-
`cated circuitry to provide the neces-
`sary functionality with the required
`performance. The circuitry can be
`on separate pieces of silicon or on
`chips that surround the ARM core
`on the same piece of silicon.
`Either way, manufacturers must
`build them to work with the ARM
`core. In some cases, the circuitry
`accelerates performance for vari-
`ous functions, such as video, with-
`out burdening the CPU. In others,
`it handles, for example, memory,
`power management, interchip con-
`nectivity, and wireless communi-
`cations such as Wi-Fi. ARM now
`designs some of the companion
`chips’ architectures, including 3D
`graphics engines, said the compa-
`ny’s Morris.
`The ARM core’s instruction set
`recognizes tasks and offloads them
`when appropriate to the correct
`piece of companion or integrated
`circuitry.
`If an application requires process-
`ing by another piece of circuitry, the
`ARM core sends it the instructions
`and then saves power by going into
`sleep mode. In addition, power-
`management features turn off the
`host device’s display, reduce screen
`brightness, or shut off peripheral
`devices or radios when not in use.
`Using multiple chips also mini-
`mizes power consumption because
`they aren’t running all the time.
`The CPU could run software to
`perform functions now handled by
`the other chips, but this uses more
`processing and power than dedi-
`cated hardware and is not as fast,
`Morris said.
`Up and coming. Later this year,
`the Marvell Technology Group plans
`to ship an ARM-based XScale pro-
`cessor that runs at 1.0 to 1.5 GHz,
`said Shyam Krishnamurthy, director
`of strategy for the company’s Mobile
`Business Group. Marvell’s current
`XScale chip, used in BlackBerry
`
`devices and smart phones from
`manufacturers such as Motorola
`and Samsung, runs at 624 MHz and
`includes applications and communi-
`cations processors.
`Given the new trends in smart
`wireless devices, ARM is design-
`ing chip cores—the Cortex A8 and
`A9—for smart phones, as well as
`for UMPCs and MIDs, which have
`bigger screens, more capabilities,
`and full Internet browsers. ARM
`designed the Cortex cores to support
`a richer set of features and provide
`more capabilities, such as higher
`clock rates and new power-manage-
`ment techniques.
`
`Mobile devices are
`performing more
`computing-related tasks
`than in the past.
`
`ARM has licensed the A8 to sev-
`eral companies, which will begin
`releasing products with it by the
`end of this year, Morris said. The
`A9 will appear in devices in three to
`five years and will have four cores to
`provide more or less power as neces-
`sary, he added.
`Qualcomm will use the A8 license
`in its new Snapdragon chipset—for
`smart phones, gaming and portable-
`entertainment devices, and mini-
`computers. The company has been
`testing Snapdragon since November
`2007 and plans to release it later this
`year, noted Manjit Gill, director of
`product management for the Qual-
`comm’s Chip Business Unit.
`TI will use the A8 in its lat-
`est smart-phone chipsets, which
`the company has been testing and
`expects to appear in products late
`this year or in early 2009. To the
`A8 core, the 800-MHz OMAP3430
`multimedia chipset, which Figure 1
`shows, adds a 2D/3D graphics accel-
`erator, a high-performance video and
`audio accelerator, and an imaging
`signal processor for a device’s cam-
`era, noted Avner Goren, director of
`
`strategic marketing in TI’s wireless
`terminal business unit.
`
`Intel’s model
`The cellular-phone market has
`grown rapidly. In 2007, vendors sold
`about 1.12 billion mobile phones,
`compared to 432.7 million in 2002,
`according to IMS Research, a mar-
`ket-analysis firm.
`This is many more than the
`271.2 million PCs and laptops
`sold last year, according to mar-
`ket-research firm Gartner Inc.
`Thus, mobile devices represent an
`increasingly attractive market for
`chip manufacturers.
`Meanwhile, sales are growing
`faster for smart phones than for
`cell phones in general. In fact, ABI
`Research says smart phones, which
`comprised 10 percent of the handset
`market in 2007, will represent nearly
`33 percent by 2013.
`Said ARM’s Morris, “The real
`market for computing is going to be
`mobile devices.” This has attracted
`Intel, the world’s biggest maker of
`PC and laptop chips.
`New chip. Intel has targeted smart
`phones before, developing the ARM-
`based, XScale processor platform
`several years ago. XScale chips were
`moderately successful, but Intel sold
`the platform to Marvell in 2006.
`Now, Intel is trying again with
`new chips marketed as one of the
`company’s Centrino processors,
`which laptops currently use. The
`Centrino Atom processor, which
`includes the Intel Atom chip and a
`controller hub designed to provide
`PC-like functionality, is due to ship
`in MIDs this summer.
`Vendors could also use Atom in
`consumer-electronics products such
`as portable media players and per-
`sonal navigation devices with Inter-
`net access, which could provide ser-
`vices like real-time traffic updates,
`noted Intel’s Kedia.
`Atom will be smaller, consume less
`power, and offer more cellular capa-
`bilities than laptop and PC chips.
`Atom supports video, audio,
`and 3D graphics, as well as Intel’s
`
` 16
`
`Computer
`
`2
`
`

`
`Trace
`analyzer
`
`Emulator
`pod
`
`NOR
`flash
`
`NAND
`flash
`
`Mobile
`DDR
`
`Trace
`
`Fast
`IrDA
`
`UART/IrDA
`
`JTAG/
`emulation
`I/F
`
`GPMC
`
`SDRC
`
`OMAP3430
`
`ARM
`Cortex-A8
`
`2D/3D Graphics
`Accelerator
`
`Imaging video and
`audio accelerator
`
`Image signal
`processor
`
`Shared memory controller/DMA
`
`Timers, interrupt controller, mailbox
`
` Boot/secure ROM
`
`GPIO
`
`Camera I/F
`serial-parallel
`
`Camera-serial
`
`GPIO
`
`Camera
`module
`
`Sub camera
`
`I2C
`
`System interface
`power reset
`clock manager
`
`McBSP
`
`McBSP
`
`TWL4030
`
`Battery
`charger
`
`Power manager
`
`Audio/voice
`codec
`
`Voice
`
`Audio
`
`Coexistence
`
`NaviLink
`GPS
`
`Hollywood
`mobile DTV
`
`WiLink
`mWLAN
`
`BlueLink
`Bluetooth
`
`Data
`
`Voice
`
`TCS
`modem
`chipset
`
`Flashing
`
`Control/data
`
`Voice
`
`I2C
`
`SPI
`
`SDIO
`
`UART
`
`McBSP
`
`USB
`
`McBSP
`
`McBSP
`
`M-Shield security technology: SHA-1/MD5,
`DES/3DES, RNG, AES, PKA, Secure WDT, Keys
`
`High-speed (HS )
`USB2 OTG controller
`
`MS/MMC/SD/SDIO
`
`MS/MMC/SD/SDIO
`card
`
`Video DAC
`S-video
`
`TV
`PAL/NTSC
`
`Display
`controller
`parallel-serial
`
`SPI
`
` QVGA
`color TFT
`display
`
` XGA
`color TFT
`display
`
`TSC2046 touch
`screen controller
`
` HS USB
`transceiver
`
`Keypad
`
`Battery
`
`On/off
`
`Reset
`
`32-kHz crystal
`Audio
`
`In/out
`
`USB
`connector
`
`LED
`Keypad
`
`Figure 1. Texas Instruments’ OMAP3430 multimedia chipset for mobile devices adds circuitry to handle numerous functions—
`including graphics and video acceleration and image signal processing—to the new Cortex A8 core that ARM Ltd. designed. This
`reflects the basic approach for ARM-based mobile chips. Rather than using one chip to handle all tasks, manufacturers add separate
`circuitry to the cores that ARM designs to handle and accelerate specialized functions.
`
`SpeedStep technology, which
`dynamically adjusts processor
`voltage and core frequency to
`meet applications’ needs, thereby
`decreasing overall power consump-
`tion. Some variants also support
`hyperthreading for improved par-
`allelization.
`Intel’s approach. Rather than
`requiring separate chips for many
`different tasks, Intel has kept most
`of the functions on the Atom itself,
`which has a burst mode that lets it
`run at higher-than-normal clock
`rates for short time periods.
`Intel is used to integrating as many
`functions as possible into its PC and
`laptop chips. The company wants to
`do the same with its mobile chips but
`must avoid excessive power usage in
`the process.
`Intel has thus integrated most
`of the functionality into Atom,
`but still uses its controller hub to
`handle some tasks, such as graph-
`ics, memory, and wireless commu-
`nications.
`
`The company says that the role of
`accelerators should be limited and
`that it is best to use an x86-based
`processor as much as possible. This
`would let mobile devices use the
`same x86-based software that per-
`sonal computers run, thereby pro-
`viding a desktop-like experience and
`enabling users to work with the same
`applications they’re accustomed to
`from their PCs.
`Inside Atom. Intel uses several
`mechanisms to manage Atom’s
`power usage, including clock gat-
`ing, which activates the clocks in
`a logic block only when they have
`work to do.
`Atom contains 47 million transis-
`tors and is the smallest processor
`Intel has ever made, measuring 25
`square millimeters, compared to the
`107 square millimeters of the Intel
`Core 2 Duo for laptops and PCs.
`“We can have up to 1.86-GHz
`performance in a device that has a 5-
`inch display and can deliver four to
`six hours of battery life in constant
`
`use,” said Kedia. According to Intel,
`Atom offers more performance than
`ARM chips due the higher clock
`speed and because it keeps most pro-
`cessing on the CPU.
`Atom consumes 2 watts of power
`at top speed, 100 milliwatts at low
`speed, and an average of 200 mil-
`liwatts running a range of applica-
`tions. Intel’s Core 2 Duo uses 35
`watts.
`Atom is fully x86-compatible,
`which means it works with appli-
`cations—including browsers and
`games—written for the x86 chips in
`PCs, said Kedia. Vendors wouldn’t
`have to rewrite these applications,
`which would be required for devices
`that use other types of chips, he
`added.
`According to Intel, users will
`want PC-like experiences from
`future mobile devices and that it
`thus designed the Centrino Atom to
`support Linux, Microsoft Windows
`Vista, and Windows XP, but not
`mobile OSs such as Symbian.
`
`
`
`May 2008
`
`17
`
`3
`
`

`
`T E C H N O L O G Y N E W S
`
`The BATTle plAys oUT
`ARM and Intel are coming at the
`mobile-device-chip market from
`different perspectives, said Gary
`Koerper, vice president of platform
`planning and systems architecture
`for Motorola’s Handset Unit.
`“ARM is coming up from the
`smart-phone space and trying to
`work into a mini-PC world, while
`Intel is coming down from the laptop
`[and PC],” he noted.
`This explains the different
`approaches they have taken with
`their mobile chips.
`According to Koerper, ARM’s
`strength in mobile devices is its low-
`cost, low-power core, and its design
`flexibility.
`The ARM Cortex A8 consumes less
`than 50 milliwatts of power in active
`mode, compared to Atom’s higher
`usage rates of up to two watts.
`
`Intel, though, has the advantage of
`working with many computer manu-
`facturers who want to begin selling
`mobile devices, noted Forward Con-
`cepts’ Strauss.
`ARM’s designs are licensed by
`companies that might implement
`them differently and add their own
`technologies, Kedia said. He main-
`tained this could lead to incompat-
`ibilities in the way the chips use
`third-party software.
`However, Morris said that ARM’s
`licensees work to ensure this doesn’t
`happen.
`
`A nalysts generally agree that
`
`Intel has made significant
`strides in mobile-chip tech-
`nology with the Centrino Atom.
`Also, the company can offer a rich
`ecosystem of vendors and developers
`
`Looking for an
`Looking for an
`“Aha” idea?
`“Aha” idea?
`Find it in CSDL
`Find it in CSDL
`Computer Society
`Digital Library
`
`200,000+
`articles and papers
`
`Per article:
`
`$9US (members)
`
`$19US (nonmembers)
`
`from the PC industry, and its chips
`can be used in many consumer prod-
`ucts, said Jim McGregor, research
`director and principal analyst for the
`In-Stat market-research firm.
`Energy consumption will be a
`critical factor. For example, noted
`Forward Concepts’ Strauss, “Nokia
`has specified they don’t want any-
`thing running more than 3 watts
`because [the heat that would gen-
`erate] would be uncomfortable for
`your ear.” Although Atom’s central
`processor may use up to 2 watts, he
`said, peripherals such as modems or
`application processors could push
`power usage over 3 watts.
`However, noted Intel’s Kedia,
`Intel’s next-generation mobile chip-
`set, code-named Moorestown, will
`use one-tenth as much power as the
`first generation of Centrino Atom
`chipsets, while maintaining the same
`performance.
`This would be much more com-
`petitive, according to Strauss.
`Of course, McGregor said, ARM
`won’t be standing still either and is
`already working on its Cortex A9
`processor.
`ARM has the advantage of expe-
`rience designing mobile chips, cores
`with low power consumption, as
`well as a large installed base. And
`makers of ARM-based chips have
`achieved economies of scale in man-
`ufacturing.
`Intel has considerable resources,
`x86 compatibility, and PC-like per-
`formance.
`McGregor said manufacturers will
`have to consider these factors as they
`decide which chips to put in their
`future smart mobile devices. ■
`
`
`Brad Smith is a freelance technology
`writer based in Castle Rock, Colo-
`rado. Contact him at pbradsmith@
`gmail.com.
`
`Editor: Lee Garber, Computer;
`l.garber@computer.org
`
` 18
`
`Computer
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket