`Filed: August 18, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ZTE USA, Inc.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00664
`Patent No. 5,812,789
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`
`
`
`
`PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and the Board’s authorization of the filing of
`
`this joint motion in its email to the parties on August 18, 2016, Petitioner ZTE
`
`USA, Inc. (“ZTE”) and Patent Owner Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture
`
`LLC (“PUMA”) jointly request that this inter partes review proceeding involving
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,812,789 (“the ’789 Patent”) be terminated based on a settlement
`
`between ZTE and Patent Owner (“the Parties”).
`
`II. REASONS FOR GRANTING THE MOTION
`Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing
`
`of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`
`Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). The Board authorized the filing of the
`
`instant motion on August 18, 2016. IPR2013-00428, Paper No. 56 provides
`
`guidance as to the content of a motion to terminate. There, the Board indicates that
`
`a joint motion, such as this one, should (a) include a brief explanation as to why
`
`termination is appropriate; (b) identify all parties in any related litigation involving
`
`the patent at issue; (c) identify any related proceedings currently before the Office,
`
`and (d) discuss specifically the current status of each such related litigation or
`
`proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding. Id. at 2. This
`
`motion satisfies each of the above requirements and is accompanied by a copy of
`
` 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the Parties’ settlement agreement, as required by 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00664
`
`§ 42.74(b).
`
`Brief Explanation of Why Termination is Appropriate
`
`a.
`Termination is appropriate because a final written decision has not been
`
`reached in this proceeding and ZTE will no longer be participating in this
`
`proceeding. The Parties have settled their disputes and executed a settlement
`
`agreement to terminate this proceeding, as well as the Parties’ related district court
`
`litigation regarding the ’789 Patent: Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC
`
`v. ZTE Corp. et al., Case Number 2:15-cv-00225 (E.D. Tex.). The district court
`
`litigation was dismissed with prejudice on August 5, 2016.
`
`b.
`
`All Parties in Any Pending Related Litigation Involving the
`Patents at Issue
`
`ZTE, ZTE (TX) Inc., ZTE Corp., and PUMA are the only Parties to the
`
`related district court litigation, Case Number 2:15-cv-00225. The ’789 patent is
`
`also at issue in other pending litigation. In Parthenon Unified Memory
`
`Architecture LLC v. HTC Corp. et al., Case Number 2:14-cv-00690 (E.D. Tex.),
`
`the parties include PUMA, HTC America, Inc., and HTC Corp. In Parthenon
`
`Unified Memory Architecture LLC v. Apple Inc., Case Number 2:15-cv-00621
`
`(E.D. Tex.), the parties include PUMA and Apple Inc. No other litigation or
`
`proceeding involving the ’789 patent is contemplated in the foreseeable future.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00664
`
`Related Proceedings Currently Before the Office
`
`c.
`In addition to the instant proceeding, ZTE and PUMA are Parties to
`
`IPR2016-00665, IPR2016-00666, IPR2016-0667, and IPR2016-00670. The
`
`Parties are currently filing motions to terminate these related proceedings.
`
`Moreover, the ’789 patent is at issue in IPR2016-00847, IPR2016-00923, and
`
`IPR2016-01135 where no decision on institution has yet issued.
`
`d.
`
`Current Status of Each Such Related Litigation or Proceeding
`With Respect to Each Party to the Litigation or Proceeding
`
`Sections II.b and c above indicate the status of each related litigation or
`
`proceeding with respect to each party to the litigation or proceeding.
`
`III. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the Parties’
`
`settlement agreement is in writing, and a true and correct copy is being filed
`
`concurrently herewith as Exhibit 2001.1 The Parties are also filing concurrently
`
`herewith a joint request under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) to treat
`
`the settlement agreement as business confidential information and keep it separate
`
`from the files of the ’789 Patent. There are no collateral agreements or
`
`
`1 The settlement agreement contains business confidential information and is being
`
`filed via the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) with access to the “Parties
`
`and Board only.”
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`understandings made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00664
`
`the inter partes review.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`For all of these reasons, the Parties respectfully request termination of this
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Masood Anjom
`Masood Anjom
`Reg. No. 62,167
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner Parthenon
`Unified Memory Architecture, LLC
`
`
`By: /s/ Lionel M. Levenue by permission
`Lionel M. Levenue
`Reg. No. 46,859
`
`Counsel for ZTE USA, Inc.
`
`
`4
`
`proceeding with respect to ZTE.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 19, 2016
`
`
`Dated: August 19, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that I caused to be served on
`
`counsel a true and correct copy of the foregoing Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`Proceeding by electronic means on the date below at the following address of
`
`Back-up Counsel for ZTE USA, Inc.
`Shaobin Zhu (Back-up Counsel)
`Reg. No. 62,741
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett & Dunner, LLP Email:
`shaobin.zhu@finnegan.com
`Mirae Asset Tower, 28/F, Unit A-B
`USPTO
`No. 166 Lujiazui Ring Road, Pudong
`Shanghai, P.R. China, 200120
`Phone: (650) 521-3338
`Fax: (202) 408-4400
`Email: shaobin.zhu@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`record:
`
`Lead Counsel for ZTE USA, Inc.
`Lionel M. Lavenue
`Registration No. 46,589
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`11955 Freedom Dr.
`Two Freedom Square
`Reston, VA 20190
`Tel: 571-203-2700
`Fax: 202-408-4400
`Email: lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`
`Back-up Counsel for ZTE USA, Inc.
`Carlos J. Rosario
`Reg. No. 67,922
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`Stanford Research Park
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203
`Phone: (202) 408-6671
`Fax: (202) 408-4400
`Email: carlos.rosario@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 19, 2016
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00664
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /s/ Masood Anjom
`Masood Anjom
`Reg. No. 62,167
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner Parthenon
`Unified Memory Architecture, LLC
`
`
`
`2