throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by guest on May 27, 2016
`
`Poster Session 3. BHPR – audit/service delivery
`
`Friday, 22 April 2005
`
`i145
`
`VDI Score increased from the time of diagnosis till the time of last follow-up
`and this rise was statistically significant (p≤0.002) in all groups. The mean
`VDI Score for the APS group at diagnosis was 4.86 and was significantly
`higher than for the aPL positive (mean VDI Score=2.02, p=0.0001) and neg-
`ative (1.93, p=0.0001) groups. At last time of follow-up the mean VDI Score
`for the APS patients was 6.27 and this value was higher than for the aPL
`positive (mean VDI Score=3.51, p=0.0001) and negative (2.96, p=0.0001)
`groups (see Figure1). 9 (4.9%) patients died, 4 of whom were assessed for
`aPL: 2 had APS and 2 positive aPL.
`Conclusions: APS is a predictor of irreversible organ damage in vasculi-
`tides. We suggest that determination of aPL is warranted in the diagnostic
`work-up of vasculitis patients.
`
`BHPR – audit/service delivery
`
`371. DO ALL PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC
`INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS IN DISTRESS NEED A
`DOCTOR?
`
`A.G. Richards, S.M. Bintley-Bagot. TherapiesDepartment,TheRoyal
`LiverpoolUniversityHospital,Liverpool,Merseyside,UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: The patient with chronic inflammatory arthritis can experience
`significant distress as their level of function declines and we struggle to man-
`age their pain effectively. The burden of responsibility increases for carers as
`the patients independence is loss.
`At clinic visits, the doctor is presented with a long complicated history, a
`distressed family, multifunctional problems and social care issues. Busy clinic
`settings often prevent detailed discussion of problems raised.
`Our purpose as Clinical Specialists in Occupational therapy and Physiother-
`apy was to establish a rapid response therapy service to meet the needs of
`patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis in distress whilst they remain in
`their own home.
`Methods: Referral criteria was formulated, patients were jointly assessed by
`a Specialist O.T. and P.T. favouring a social care model of practice within 4
`weeks. A treatment plan was formulated, implemented and evaluated.
`Results: 42 referrals recieved. F:M 36:6 aged 34-93, disease duration av
`15.4 yrs 45% not on DMARDS. 0% employed 100% needed carer support
`73% had accomodation that did not meet their needs. 34% required referrals
`to local agencies. 16.6% did need to see a doctor for review of medication.
`17% needed a referral to other specialities but did not need to see a doctor.
`This graph displays functional problems identified and therapy intervention.
`
`Summary of therapy intervention.
`
`Conclusions: Predominantly patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis in
`distress did not present with medical problems. They focused on functional,
`social, emotional and housing issues. Our focus on treatment was to restore
`function, prevent falls, improve safety, gain pain control, liase with commu-
`nity support networks and most importantly to address the patients/families
`concerns.
`The service was cost effective in terms of reduced ambulance requests,
`clinic appointments, and hospital admissions.
`94% patients were very satisfied and felt the service met their needs.
`Common themes were identified enabling a guideline of therapy manage-
`ment of chronic inflammatory arthritis to emerge.
`Evaluation of the rapid response therapy service has highlighted the diverse
`role specialist therapists can contribute. Limited time/resources make it cru-
`cial we identify the most appropriate professional to review the patient in the
`
`most relevant setting.If these patients are to maintain maximum indepen-
`dence they do need a doctor but their need for highly skilled therapy staff is
`much greater.
`
`372.
`"I WANTED TO GIVE SOMETHING BACK":
`THE POSITIVE EFFECTS OF VOLUNTEERING AT A
`COMMUNITY-BASED ARTHRITIS RESOURCE CENTRE
`E.D. Hale1, G.J. Treharne1,2, C. Gordhan3, P.A. Bacon3, G.D. Kitas 1,2,3.
`1DepartmentofRheumatology,DudleyGroupofHospitalsNHSTrust,
`Dudley,WestMidlands,UnitedKingdom;2SchoolofPsychology,University
`ofBirmingham,Birmingham,UnitedKingdom;3Departmentof
`Rheumatology,DivisionofImmunityandInfection,SchoolofMedicine,
`UniversityofBirmingham,Birmingham,UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: Community-based arthritis resource centres provide informa-
`tion on a wide range of rheumatic conditions. Trained volunteers offer sup-
`port, information and signposting to patients, their families and friends.
`Methods: We sought to understand the impetus for volunteering and the per-
`ceived personal effects for the volunteers. Semi-structured interviews were
`conducted with four female trained volunteers, aged 45-77, at a community-
`based arthritis resource centre. All four volunteers have a rheumatic disease.
`Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using In-
`terpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
`Results: The impetus for volunteering came from a sense of strength gained
`from adversity and the desire to share experiences with others. The two ma-
`jor themes that emerged were Sharing Experiences and Making Choices.
`Participants’ were very aware of the value of personal support and encour-
`agement coupled with written information, due to their own experiences of
`uncertainty and isolation. Talking to another person with actual experience of
`rheumatic disease was perceived as very valuable as "it only takes one qual-
`ified volunteer you know". Re-establishing feelings of control and choice can
`take some time for people with rheumatic disease. Volunteering facilitates
`this process for both client and volunteer. Awareness of the new "changed"
`body is used as a positive example of accomplishment, reframing that which
`could be perceived negatively. Sharing knowledge and giving support re-
`establishes feelings of self-worth and being needed for the volunteers. The
`volunteers acknowledged that their work enabled them to focus on others
`rather than themselves, although they seized the opportunity to portray them-
`selves in a positive way. This enabled the volunteers to become "visible"
`again within society and less isolated. Helping someone to leave "much
`lighter in step" than when they came in made the volunteers’ feel needed
`and their role worthwhile.
`Conclusions: Trained volunteers at community-based arthritis support cen-
`tres can offer confidential support, information and signposting to clients
`(patients,
`their families and friends) without
`time constraints,
`in a non-
`threatening atmosphere. Volunteers with personal experience of rheumatic
`disease act as positive role models and gain personal benefit by enhancing
`their own feelings of self-worth.
`
`373.
`"JOINING THE DOTS": ISOLATION,
`UNDERSTANDING AND INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE
`FOR PATIENTS WITH LUPUS
`E.D. Hale1, G.J. Treharne1,2, D.L. Mitton1,3, S. Mole1, Y. Norton4,
`G.D. Kitas 1,2,5. 1DepartmentofRheumatology,DudleyGroupofHospitals
`NHSTrust,Dudley,WestMidlands,UnitedKingdom;2Schoolof
`Psychology,UniversityofBirmingham,Birmingham,UnitedKingdom;
`3SchoolofHealthSciences,UniversityofBirmingham,Birmingham,West
`Midlands,UnitedKingdom;4WestMidlandsBranch,LupusUK,Coseley,
`WestMidlands,UnitedKingdom;5DepartmentofRheumatology,Divisionof
`ImmunityandInfection,SchoolofMedicine,UniversityofBirmingham,
`Birmingham,UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem disease
`requiring multidisciplinary health and psychosocial care.
`Methods: We examined the impact of external (social) and internal (psy-
`chological) features on SLE patients’ perceptions of healthcare provision.
`Semistructured interviews conducted with ten women, aged 32-68 with SLE
`for 1-12 years, were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed us-
`ing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
`Results: Three themes emerged: Isolation, Understanding and Communi-
`cation. Participants described how medical advice produced physical and
`subsequent social Isolationand felt that healthcare professionals did not ap-
`preciate its consequences. The body became physically isolated as it was
`concealed with clothing to protect from photosensitivity and with makeup to
`cover rashes. This theme was connected to feelings of "difference" to others,
`due to appearance and energy changes, and lack of Understanding. Partic-
`ipants expressed the opinion that no-one really understood what it was like
`to have lupus. Socially, they found that family and employers could not un-
`
`Medac Exhibit 2014
`Frontier Therapeutics v. Medac
`IPR2016-00649
`Page 00001
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by guest on May 27, 2016
`
`i146
`
`Friday, 22 April 2005
`
`Poster Session 3. BHPR – audit/service delivery
`
`derstand the fluctuating nature of the disease. There was great concern to
`appear "legitimately" ill and to have a label for their condition. For some this
`had entailed a lengthy search within healthcare services, which highlighted
`Communicationissues. They felt that only specialists had some understand-
`ing of their condition but even they did not understand psychosocial con-
`cerns. GPs and non-specialist doctors were felt to be poorly informed about
`lupus, undermining confidence in treatments and healthcare providers. Par-
`ticipants often saw several specialists and did not know whom to approach
`to talk about their concerns. Lack of communication at an interdisciplinary
`level left them feeling that "nobody is joining the dots".
`Conclusions: The effects of SLE and measures that minimise the ef-
`fects of photosensitivity have implications not fully understood by healthcare
`providers. Lack of communication left patients with concerns that could be
`remedied. Integrated clinics and the presence of trained volunteers with lu-
`pus, such as those available at the lupus open-access group in Dudley, en-
`sure more adequate information from "someone who really understands".
`This may help minimise feelings of isolation.
`
`374.
`THE NATIONAL LIBRARY FOR HEALTH -
`TRAUMA, ORTHOPAEDICS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL
`SPECIALIST LIBRARIES
`A.C. Redmond1,2, R. Armstrong2, A. Brockelhurst 2, K. Dziedzic 2,
`D. Pattison2, A. Hammond2, J.A.M. Gray 2. 1AcademicUnitof
`MusculoskeletalDisease,UniversityofLeeds,Leeds,W.Yorks,United
`Kingdom;2Trauma,OrthopaedicsandMusculoskeletalSpecialistLibraries,
`NHSNationalProgramforIT,London,UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: The National electronic Library for Health comes under the
`umbrella of the National Library for Health, a development of existing library
`services for the NHS and higher education, and itself part of the Department
`of Health’s National Program for IT.
`There are 19 specialist libraries covering medical specialities from cancer
`through respiratory care, to women’s health, and including dedicated spe-
`cialist libraries for Trauma, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal care. There
`are additional generic portals for 11 professional groups including most of
`the AHPs.
`Methods: A team of associate editors and reviewers source, review and
`summarise information for relevance, quality and accessibility before pro-
`ducing a short summary of its merit and providing a link to the resource.
`Results: The NeLH is used by around 200,000 people every month and has
`developed a strong identity as a source of authoritative evidence and best
`practice to support health care.
`The NeLH provides direct access to important health care resources such as
`the National Service Frameworks, NICE guidelines, and protocols and care
`pathways as well as on-line access to the Cochrane database of systematic
`reviews, PubMed/Medline and 1000 full text journals.
`Conclusions: This paper will outline the main features of
`the NeLH
`Trauma, Orthopaedics Musculoskeletal Specialist Libraries, highlighting ser-
`vices available and advising clinicians on how to get the most from the library.
`The tabbed features stratifying information according to the hierarchy of ev-
`idence will be introduced, along with advanced features such as searching
`for information using index terms. Finally, the SL’s future role in linking to the
`electronic care record will be outlined, describing how the system will de-
`velop in time to suggest evidence, and to support prompts and reminders in
`the electronic care pathway.
`
`375. A RETROSPECTIVE AUDIT OF SECONDARY
`HEALTH CARE UTILISATION OF PATIENTS WITH
`FIBROMYALGIA
`
`S. Ryan, P. Dawes, M. Kirwan. StaffordshireRheumatologyCentre,The
`HaywoodHospital,Burslem,StokeonTrent,UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: Fibromyalgia is the third commonest reason for a rheumato-
`logical referral. Fibromyalgia has a negative effect on the individual in terms
`of reduced physical, psychological and social function and on society with in-
`creased use of health care utilisation and sickness benefits. In 2000 a Nurse
`Consultant was appointed to develop a Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Ser-
`vice. One of the aims of this service was to reduce the fragmentation of the
`existing service, which resulted in patients attending numerous specialists
`and receiving conflicting advice regarding care management. The objective
`of this audit was to assess secondary health care utilisation following atten-
`dance at a Consultant Nurse-led pain clinic.
`Methods: 60 consecutive new patients who had been reviewed in the Con-
`sultant Nurse-led pain clinic were selected from the fibromyalgia database
`by a research nurse not involved in the patients’ clinical care. The hospital
`computerised information system was utilised to obtain information regarding
`which secondary health care services had been accessed five years prior to
`the pain clinic appointment and which secondary care services were being
`
`utilised 12-36 months following attendance at the pain clinic. Demographic
`data and the number of attendance at each secondary care appointment
`was also recorded.
`Results: The sample consisted of 57 women and 3 men, mean age of 41
`years (age range 29-71 years). 42 patients were married and 22 were in em-
`ployment. In the 5 years prior to attending the Consultant Nurse-led clinic pa-
`tients were accessing between 1-16 different hospital specialities (median 5).
`The number of different hospital specialities being accessed 12-36 months
`following attendance at the pain clinic ranged from 1-11 with a median of
`1. Fifty-three patients reduced the number of specialities they were seeing,
`3 patients increased the number and 4 patients continued to see the same
`number of specialists. Services patients were no longer accessing included
`Rheumatology (n=39), Imaging (n=33), Orthopeadics (n=30), Accident and
`Emergency (n=27) and Gynaecology (n-15). The total number of secondary
`care appointments in all specialities fell from a median of 12 (range 1-76) to
`2 (range 1-30).
`Conclusions: Having a designated Consultant Nurse-led service for the
`management of patients with Fibromyalgia may reduce the utilisation of sec-
`ondary care specialities.
`
`376. BENCHMARKING THE
`NURSE CONSULTANT ROLE IN RHEUMATOLOGY
`S. Ryan1, A. Browne2, S. Hennell 3,
`D. Home4, A. Wild5, D. Homer6. 1StaffordshireRheumatologyCentre,
`StokeonTrent,UnitedKingdom;2RoyalOldhamHospital,Oldham,United
`Kingdom;3WirralHospitalNHSTrust,Wirral,UnitedKingdom;4Department
`ofRheumatology,WestMiddlesexUniversityHospital,Middlesex,United
`Kingdom;5WorcestershireAcuteHospitalsNHSTrust,Worcester,United
`Kingdom;6DepartmentofRheumatology,SellyOakHospital,Birmingham,
`UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: The Nurse Consultant role was introduced in 1998 to expand
`the clinical career pathway and retain experienced nurses in clinical care.
`These roles are essential to strengthen professional leadership whilst provid-
`ing a framework to develop research and educational initiatives. Core stan-
`dards for Nurse Consultants in rheumatology have been devised to support
`role development.
`Methods: Rheumatology Nurse Consultants (n=6) have devised a forum for
`quarterly meetings with the aim of providing peer supervision and collabora-
`tion on role developments. The first outcome was the creation of core stan-
`dards using national criteria as a benchmark which were developed using
`a mapping exercise achieving majority consensus. The resulting criteria fo-
`cused on role function including expert clinical practice, education, research,
`leadership.
`Results: Specific core standards for rheumatology Nurse Consultants have
`been developed. Fifty per cent of the role will involve clinical care e.g. nurse-
`led initiatives addressing patient focused outcomes with the remaining time
`divided between service improvements, developing education and research
`opportunities. The standards are adaptable and will be influenced by the
`needs of the local population, resources, knowledge and skills of the Nurse
`Consultant and team members. The standards also include the support
`mechanisms required to perform the role including supervision, secretarial
`and information technology. A future objective of the group will be to conduct
`peer review visits to benchmark the implementation of the standards.
`Conclusions: The core standards are relevant to rheumatology Nurse Con-
`sultant role development. It is envisaged that all Nurse Consultants will struc-
`ture their role around the standards, personalised to their area of work or
`interests and that they will provide a framework for new or aspiring Nurse
`Consultants.
`
`377.
`TELEPHONE FOLLOW UP OF PATIENTS
`COMMENCING ORAL BISPHOSPHONATES
`
`G. Loghan, T.W. O’Neill. DepartmentofRheumatology,
`HopeHospital,Salford,Manchester,UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: Bisphosphonates are widely used in the management of os-
`teoporosis. Non compliance may, however, limit the effectiveness of therapy.
`The aim of this study was to determine whether telephone follow up can be
`used as a tool to detect non compliance and side effects amongst osteo-
`porotic patients who have recently commenced bisphosphonate therapy.
`Methods: Men and women with osteoporosis attending the metabolic bone
`clinic at Hope hospital, Salford and who were recommended bisphosphonate
`therapy, were registered for telephone follow up. At the hospital, patients
`are given a hand-written note to take to their GP with a view to prescribing
`therapy, followed by a dictated clinic letter. Patients were contacted 6 weeks
`following their clinic visit and information obtained about whether or not they
`were currently taking therapy, and, if not, the reasons for this. If they were
`taking therapy, they were asked whether they were taking it appropriately
`
`Page 00002
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by guest on May 27, 2016
`
`Poster Session 3. BHPR – audit/service delivery
`
`Friday, 22 April 2005
`
`i147
`
`(based on manufacturers recommendations) and if they were experiencing
`side effects.
`Results: In total 63 patients with osteoporosis were registered for telephone
`follow up. Their median age was 70 years and 54 (86%) were female. Of
`those registered, 56 were contacted (after an average of 2 telephone calls)
`with the remaining patients unable to be contacted. Of the 56 who were
`contacted 17 (30%) were not currently taking therapy. The reasons for this
`were because they had developed side effects (2), were apprehensive about
`taking the medication they had received (5), had not yet received if from their
`GP (4), were not clear why they had been prescribed it (3) and other reasons
`(3). Of the 39 who were currently taking therapy, almost all were taking it
`according to manufacturers recommendations, though a significant number
`(15) were experiencing some side effects. As a result of the telephone follow
`up, 22 patients were referred back either to the clinic for assessment or to
`their general practitioner with recommendations about therapy. One patient
`required a home visit.
`Conclusions: In conclusion telephone follow up is a useful tool in the early
`detection of non-compliance and side effects associated with bisphospho-
`nate therapy in patients with osteoporosis.
`
`378. EVALUATION OF AN EVIDENCE-BASED
`PHYSIOTHERAPY PROGRAMME FOR THE MANAGEMENT
`OF PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE
`
`M.J. Domaille, R. Mascarenhas, N. Dayal, J.R. Kirwan. Rheumatology
`Centre,BristolRoyalInfirmary,Bristol,UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of a phys-
`iotherapy programme for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee which
`was based on published studies, and to compare this to the outcomes of re-
`search based programmes. The purpose was to evaluate whether improve-
`ments in pain and function demonstrated following research trials actually
`translate to the clinical setting.
`Methods: Based on a review of published studies a Physiotherapy OA Knee
`Programme of group education and exercise, was set up to be delivered for
`one hour per week over six weeks. Prior to commencing the programme
`all clients were assessed by a Chartered Physiotherapist and any individual
`treatment was completed.
`Education covered anatomy of the knee, pathology of OA, benefits of exer-
`cise, use of heat and cold, indications for walking aids and the importance of
`footwear. Exercise comprised of a five minute warm up followed by a circuit
`of eleven stations. Each of the stations had 3 exercise options: "easy", "mod-
`erate" and "difficult". Patients performed the "easy" option at each station for
`2 minutes on Week One of the programme and progressed to the "moderate"
`and "difficult" options as they were able during the course of the programme.
`Outcomes were measured using the WOMAC questionnaire and a visual
`analogue scale (VAS) for pain which were completed by all patients prior to
`Session 1 and immediately following the final session. Further analysis was
`performed using confidence intervals and a paired t-test. The outcomes from
`this Bristol OA Knee Programme were then compared with results from four
`papers using similar interventions and evaluation tools.
`Results: 103 patients completed the programme. For WOMAC scores and
`pain VAS see Table 1. The results demonstrated statistically significant (p<
`0.05) reductions in pain, stiffness and disability. The greatest improvement
`was in reduction in pain (43% in VAS) which was a larger effect size than
`that reported following similar OA Knee Programmes, which showed a mean
`reduction of 16% in VAS. Other changes were similar to those reported in
`clinical trials.
`
`WOMAC scores pre and post OA Knee Programme
`
`Outcome
`
`WOMAC pain
`WOMAC stiffness
`WOMAC disability
`WOMAC overall
`VAS pain
`
`Pre-group
`Mean score
`9.5
`4.3
`32.8
`46.4
`66.9
`
`p<0.05 for all mean change scores
`
`Post-group
`Mean score
`8.1
`3.8
`28.4
`40.2
`38.2
`
`Percentage
`improvement
`15
`11
`14
`14
`43
`
`Conclusions: This study is representative of a true clinical service aimed
`at managing patients with OA of the knee. Despite research trials gener-
`ally having greater levels intervention, this programme has demonstrated a
`higher reduction in VAS pain scores and has also shown a significant im-
`provement in overall WOMAC which is comparable with the results from re-
`search trials.
`
`379. SETTING UP A PATIENT REFERENCE GROUP TO
`INFORM SERVICE DELIVERY IN A RHEUMATOLOGY
`UNIT
`
`A.E. Griffiths, J. Novak, S. Balshaw, M.P. Lynch, V.E. Abernethy,
`J.K. Dawson. RheumatologyPracticeDevelopmentUnit,StHelens&
`KnowsleyHospitalsNHSTrust,StHelens,Merseyside,UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: There has been a move to give patients a real say in the way
`the NHS works. This has been highlighted recently in the BSR standards of
`care for patients with RA. In 2003 we set up a Rheumatology patient refer-
`ence group (PRG). The aim of the presentation is to outline the process of
`setting up the PRG and identify the impact it has had on our Rheumatology
`Unit.
`Methods: To become a member of the PRG a defined recruitment pro-
`cess has been developed, including an application pack for prospective pa-
`tients/carers. An elected Chairman and Secretary run the group. Terms of
`reference have been drawn up by the group.
`Objectives of the group are to enable service users to comment on the ser-
`vice provided and to contribute to planning, delivery and evaluation of the
`Unit.
`The PRG meets regularly to action comments collected from other services
`users, discuss proposed service developments and review prospective pa-
`tient information.
`Results: The group devised a system whereby they canvas the views of
`Rheumatology Out-patients on a 6 weekly basis. To date approximately 500
`patients have had the opportunity to comment on the service. 114 comments
`sheets have been completed, providing 194 comments/suggestions. Of the
`themes emerging, 74% of the comments show satisfaction with Unit staff and
`service/care received, and 26% of comments highlight concerns which have
`been reviewed by the PRG. All patient comments are acted on by the group,
`which involves corresponding with Trust Management including the Chief
`Executive, the Rheumatology multi-disciplinary team and reporting back to
`the patient/carer if requested.
`To date, changes brought about by the PRG include access to the Rheuma-
`tology Department being improved with increased disabled car parking,
`strategically placed seating and review of unsuitable doors (all funded by
`the Trust). Reopening of in-patient beds when the Rheumatology ward was
`temporarily closed was influenced by the group. Changes to the service in-
`clude a manned nurse led Helpline service being available for an hour each
`day in addition to 3 telephone Helplines using answer machines, and blood
`monitoring clinics are moving to an appointment system.
`In addition, 20 patient information leaflets have been reviewed to ensure
`appropriate written communication, and reports provided. The PRG has also
`served as a model for other specialities setting up their own groups.
`Conclusions: The PRG has been instrumental in evaluating, monitoring and
`developing St Helens and Knowsley Trust Rheumatology Unit. With surpris-
`ing speed the PRG has already canvassed and improved the quality of the
`service provided.
`
`380. CAN PIIINP HELP IN MONITORING RHEUMATOID
`ARTHRITIS PATIENTS ON METHOTREXATE?
`M. Lloyd1, S. Burton1, U. David2, P. Cusick 3. 1Departmentof
`Rheumatology,FrimleyParkHospital,Frimley,Surrey;2Departmentof
`ClinicalBiochemistry,FrimleyParkHospital,Frimley,Surrey;3Audit
`Department,FrimleyParkHospital,Frimley,Surrey,UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: A 67 yr old rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient of ours was ad-
`mitted with acute liver failure and died shortly afterwards. He had been on
`methotrexate (MTX) for the previous 5 years and had had normal liver func-
`tion tests (LFTs) until just before admission. Liver ultrasound (US) on admis-
`sion suggested early fibrosis and portal hypertension. This prompted us to
`look at serum type III procollagen aminopeptide (PIIINP) in our RA patients
`on MTX. Standard LFTs are a relatively insensitive test for liver fibrosis and
`several reports have suggested that PIIINP, particularly when used sequen-
`tially, may be a better test.1 This issue is particularly relevant in view of recent
`national patient safety advice.2
`Methods: PIINP tests have been requested when thought to be clinically
`indicated in 36 patients with RA. Tests were identified via biochemistry
`database and notes pulled. Notes were available on 25 patients. Data were
`analysed using Formic software.
`Results: 25 patients had a total of 31 tests. Female:male ratio was 17:8.
`
`Characteristics of patients with normal and raised PIIINP
`
`Age (yrs)
`RA duration (yrs)
`MTX duration (yrs)
`Total MTX dose (mg)
`
`Normal PIIINP (n=9)
`56
`6
`3
`2050
`
`Raised PIIINP (n=16)
`65
`13
`4.5
`2308
`
`Page 00003
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by guest on May 27, 2016
`
`i148
`
`Friday, 22 April 2005
`
`Poster Session 3. BHPR – audit/service delivery
`
`Mean age: 62 yrs (range 43-75yrs). Average duration of RA: 10.5 yrs (2-
`25yrs), mean duration of MTX treatment: 4 yrs (1-10yrs). 7 patients were
`taking regular folic acid. To our knowledge, none took excess alcohol. Rea-
`sons for testing PIIINP were: raised ALT (20 patients), raised alkaline phos-
`phatase (8), raised MCV (1) and long duration of treatment (1). Liver US was
`requested in 14 patients. 5 scans were abnormal, all suggesting fatty infiltra-
`tion. All 5 patients had high PIIINP. Conversely, 5 patients with normal liver
`US had raised PIIINP. MTX was stopped in 7 patients. 2 of these had raised
`PIIINP alone; 2 had raised PIIINP and abnormal US.
`Conclusions: This is a small but on-going study, intended to stimulate dis-
`cussion. A "new generation" of MTX treated RA patients may be emerging
`who are at potential risk of undiagnosed liver damage. These are patients
`who have been on the drug for many years, may accumulate co-medication
`and may slip into excess alcohol intake. Our data are limited by the absence
`of liver biopsy as a "gold standard" but the reality is that biopsies are now
`very rarely used in rheumatology.We are starting to use PIIINP, in conjuction
`with liver US3, to inform our decisions about MTX continuation.
`References
`[1] Br J Dermatol 1996;135:538-544
`[2] www.npsa.nhs.uk/advice
`[3] Br J Dermatol 1987;116:491-495
`
`381. AUDIT: BONE SCINTIGRAPHY USE IN THE
`INVESTIGATION OF FOOT PAIN IN THE OUT PATIENT
`CLINIC OVER A 5 YEAR PERIOD
`
`E.A. Justice, P. Newton, M. Collins. DepartmentofRheumatology,New
`CrossHospital,Wolverhampton,UnitedKingdom;DepartmentofRadiology,
`NewCrossHospital,Wolverhampton,UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: This audit had a dual purpose: Firstly, to define the indica-
`tions for bone scintigraphy in the investigation of foot pain and create from
`the current literature a "Gold Standard" with which to compare our own de-
`partment’s practice; secondly to analyse whether those requests compliant
`with the gold standard had a greater yield of useful clinical information com-
`pared with non-compliant requests.
`Methods: 35 patients were identified having searched radiology requests
`for "foot pain" and "bone scintigraphy" from the period April 1998 to April
`2003. The notes and reports from the scans were reviewed retrospectively
`by one clinician (EJ). The following data were collected: name and age at the
`time of bone scan; the specific clinical problem necessitating the bone scan,
`for example "heel pain", any relevant past medical history and the reason
`given for requesting the scan, for example "Possible plantar fasciitis". The
`findings of the scan, any intervention and the subsequent clinical course of
`each patient were looked at. The reasons for requesting a scan were then
`compared with 10 "Goldstandard" indications defined following a review of
`current literature.1,2,3 (see Appendix) The scan report of those adherent to
`the "Gold standard" were then analysed and defined as being either helpful
`or unhelpful in the patient’s management. The same analysis was performed
`on non-adherent scans.
`In this way we hoped to test the robustness of the "Gold standards" in order
`to create departmental Guidelines for the use of Bone Scintigraphy.
`Results: Demographics: Mean age 50.6 years, Range of ages 14-72 years,
`12 male, 23 female.
`24/35 Scans ordered according to "Gold standard" (27 accounts given for 24
`patients)
`Of the "appropriately" ordered scans, what proportion were helpful in aid-
`ing/changing the diagnosis and management:
`Helpful: 18/24 (75%)
`Unhelpful: 2/24 (8.3%)
`Normal scan 4/24 (16.6%)
`11/35 scans ordered inappropriate:
`6/11 helpful (54.5%)
`3 of which lead to an alternative diagnosis and 3 of which were normal.
`Normal Bone Scans:
`In total 7/35 had normal scans
`At follow up 2/7 had no symptoms and none had any long term problems
`Conclusions: 68.5% scans were ordered according to literature- derived
`"Gold standardsYield of useful
`information is higher in those ordered ac-
`cording to Guidelines: 75% v 54.5%
`Higher rate of negative scans in the group of "inappropriately ordered" scans:
`27% v 16%
`A negative scan can be reassuring as there were no long term sequelae in
`our group.
`
`382. RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENT EDUCATION
`IN THE UK – WHAT IS ON OFFER AND HOW IS IT
`DELIVERED?
`Z. Cockshott 1, S. Hewlett 1, C. Almeida1, P. Richards 1, R. Lowe2,
`J. Kirwan1, R. Study Group. 1AcademicRheumatology,UniversityofBristol,
`Bristol,UnitedKingdom;2PsychologyDept,UniversityofWales,Swansea,
`UnitedKingdom
`
`Background: Many UK Rheumatology Centres aim to provide RA Patient
`Education/Self Management programs. Whilst these are assumed to be sim-
`ilar in nature and content, there is no standardised format. This abstract de-
`scribes 11 such programs delivered in the UK.
`Methods: Eleven UK patient education programs were described as part
`of the RA Self-Efficacy RASE Study. A structured questionnaire explored
`course content, organisation and participants. Responses were either by
`self-report (6/11) or by interview (5/11).
`Results: The size of education "group" ranged from 1 to 12 patients (mean
`7), with two centres offering education on a one-to-one basis. The total num-
`ber of sessions in a program range

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket