`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`AVX, CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00636
`Patent No. 6,661,639 B2
`_______________
`
`STIPULATION CONCERNING SCHEDULE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00636
`Patent 6,661,639
`
`Petitioner AVX, Corp. and Patent Owner Presidio Components, Inc. have
`
`conferred, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
`
`1. Due Date 2 is extended to February 21, 2017, for the purpose of AVX
`
`submitting its reply to Presidio’s response to AVX’s petition.
`
`2. All other Due Dates set forth in Paper 6, dated August 22, 2016, remain as
`
`stated therein, as indicated in the attached Schedule Appendix.
`
`Dated: February 17, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Michael R. Houston /
`
`/Gregory F. Ahrens (with permission)/
`
`Michael R. Houston (Reg. No. 58,486)
`mhouston@foley.com
`Paul S. Hunter (Reg. No. 44,787)
`phunter@foley.com
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`321 North Clark Street, Ste. 2800
`Chicago, IL 60654
`(312) 832-4500
`(312) 832-4700 (Fax)
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`Gregory F. Ahrens (Reg. No. 32,957)
`gahrens@whe-law.com
`Brett A. Schatz (Reg. No. 59,764)
`bschatz@whe-law.com
`WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP
`441 Vine Street, 2700 Carew Tower
`Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-2917
`(513) 241-2324
`(513) 241-6234 (Fax)
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 1 ...........................................................................November 14, 2016
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ...........................................................................February 20, 2017
`
` ...................................................................................................February 21, 2017
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 ............................................................................... March 6, 2017
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 ............................................................................... March 27, 2017
`
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ............................................................................... April 10, 2017
`
`Response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ............................................................................... April 17, 2017
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ............................................................................... May 2, 2017
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`(37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e))
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was served on
`
`February 17, 2017, by having a copy delivered via electronic mail on the following
`
`attorneys of record for Patent Owner:
`
`Brett A. Schatz (bschatz@whe-law.com)
`
`Gregory F. Ahrens (gahrens@whe-law.com)
`
`Lisa M. A. Nolan (lnolan@whe-law.com)
`
`WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP
`
`2700 Carew Tower
`
`441 Vine Street
`
`Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-2917
`
`(513) 241-2324
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner Presidio Components, Inc.
`
`Date: February 17, 2017
`
` By: Michael R. Houston
`Michael R. Houston (Reg. No. 58,486)
` FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
` Attorney for Petitioner
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
