throbber
(12) United States Patent
`Yanni et al.
`
`(54) METHOD OF INHIBITING CYTOKINE
`RELEASE FROM HUMAN OCULAR CELLS
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: John M. Yanni, Burleson; Daniel A.
`Gamache; Lori K. Weimer, both of
`Arlington, all of TX (US)
`
`(73) Assignee: Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth,
`TX (US)
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. 154(b), the term of this
`patent shall be extended for 0 days.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 09/333,454
`
`(22) Filed: (cid:9)
`
`Jun. 15, 1999
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`(60) Provisional application No. 60/092,762, filed on Jul. 14,
`1998.
`Int. C1.7 (cid:9)
`(51)
`(52) U.S. Cl. (cid:9)
`(58) Field of Search
`
`A61K 31/335
`514/450
`514/450
`
`
`
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4,871,865 (cid:9)
`4,923,892 (cid:9)
`5,116,863 (cid:9)
`5,641,805 (cid:9)
`
`10/1989 Lever, Jr. et al. (cid:9)
`5/1990 Lever, Jr. et al. (cid:9)
`5/1992 Oshima et al. (cid:9)
`6/1997 Yanni et al. (cid:9)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`549/354
`514/450
`514/450
`514/450
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`0 048 023 A2
`0 214 779 Al
`0 235 796 A2
`
`3/1982 (EP) .
`3/1987 (EP) .
`9/1987 (EP) .
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Yanni et al. (1), Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther., vol. 12, No. 4, pp.
`389-400, 1996.*
`Kamei et al, Biol. Pharm. Bull., vol. 18, No. 11, pp.
`1518-1521, Nov. 1995.*
`Kamei et al, Arzneimittelforschung, vol. 45, No. 9, pp.
`1008-1008, Sep. 1995.*
`Miki et al., "Histamine Enhanced the TNF—a—Induced
`Expression of E—Selectin and ICAM-1 on Vascular Endot-
`helial Cells," Cellular Immunology, vol. 171, pp. 285-288
`(1996).
`Church, "Is Inhibition of Mast Cell Mediator Release Rel-
`evant to the Clinical Activity of Anti—allergic Drugs?,"
`Agents and Actions, vol. 18, 3/4, pp. 288-293 (1986).
`Clegg et al., "Histamine Secretion from Human Skin Slices
`Induced by Anti—IgE and Artificial Secretagogues and the
`Effects of Sodium Cromoglycate and Salbutanol," Clin.
`Allergy, vol. 15, pp. 321-328 (1985).
`Hamilton et al., "Comparison of a New Antihistaminic and
`Antiallergic Compound KW 4679 with Terfenadine and
`Placebo on Skin and Nasal Provocation in Atopic Individu-
`als," Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 24, pp.
`955-959 (1994).
`Ikeda et al., "Effects of Oxatomide and KW-4679 on
`Acetylcholine—Induced Responses in the Isolated Acini of
`Guinea Pig Nasal Glands," Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., vol.
`106, pp. 157-162 (1995.
`
`1111111111111111111111111110I191111111111111111111111111
`
`(to) Patent No.: (cid:9)
`(45) Date of Patent: (cid:9)
`
`US 6,174,914 B1
`Jan. 16, 2001
`
`Irani et al., "Mast Cell Heterogeneity," Clinical and Experi-
`mental Allergy, vol. 19, pp. 143-155 (1989).
`Kamei et al., "Effects of Certain Antiallergic Drugs on
`Experimental Conjunctivitis in Guinea Pigs," Atarashii
`Ganka, vol. 11(4), p. 603-605 (1994) (abstract only).
`Kamei et al., "Effect of (Z)-11—[3—(Dimethylamino) propy-
`lidene]-6,11—clihydrodibenz[b,e]oxepin-2—acetic (cid:9)
`Acid
`Hydrochloride on Experimental Allergic Conjunctivitis and
`Rhinitis in Rats and Guinea Pigs," Arzneimittelforschung,
`vol. 45 (9), p. 1005-1008 (1995).
`Ohshima et al., "Synthesis and Antiallergic Activity of
`11—(Aminoalkylidene)-6,11,dihydrodibenz[b,e] (cid:9)
`oxepin
`Derivatives," J. (cid:9) Medicinal (cid:9) Chemistry, (cid:9) vol. (cid:9) 35(11), (cid:9) p.
`2074-2084 (1992).
`Pearce et al., "Effect of Disodium Cromoglycate on Antigen
`Evoked Histamine Release in Human Skin," Clinical Exp.
`Immunol., vol. 17, pp. 437-440 (1974).
`Sharif et al., "Characterization of the Ocular Antiallergic and
`Antihistaminic Effects of Olopatadine (AL-4943A), a Novel
`Drug for Treating Ocular Allergic Diseases," J. of Pharma-
`cology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 278(3), p.
`1252-1261 (1996).
`Sharif et al., "Olopatadine (AL-4943A): Pharmacological
`Profile of a Novel Anti—histaminic/Anti—allergic Drug for
`Use in Allergic Conjunctivitis," Investigative Ophthalmol-
`ogy & Visual Science, vol. 37(3), p. 1027 (1996) (abstract
`only).
`Siraganian, "An Automated Continuous Flow System for the
`Extraction and Fluorometric Analysis of Histamine," Anal.
`Biochem., vol. 57, pp. 383-394 (1974).
`Spitalny et al., "Olopatadine Ophthalmic Solution Decreases
`Itching and Redness Associated with Allergic Conjunctivi-
`tis," Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol.
`37(3), p. 593 (1996) (abstract only).
`Yanni et al., "The In Vitro and In Vivo Ocular Pharmacology
`of Olopatadine (AL-4943A), An Effective Anti—allergic/
`Anti—histaminic Agent," Investigative Ophthalmology &
`Visual Science, vol. 37(3), p. 1028 (1996) (abstract only).
`Yoshida et al., "Role of NF—kB—Mediated Interleukin-8
`Expression in Intraocular Neovascularization," Investigative
`Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 39(7), pp. 1097-1106
`(1998).
`Zhang et al., "Optically Active Analogues of Ebastine:
`Synthesis and Effect of Chirality on Their Antihistaminic
`and Antimuscarinic Activity," Chirality, vol. 6(8), p.
`631-641 (1994).
`
`(List continued on next page.)
`
`Primary Examiner—James H. Reamer
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Patrick M. Ryan
`
`(57) (cid:9)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Ophthalmic formulations containing as an active ingredient
`11-(3-dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
`thereof are useful for inhibiting cytokine release (e.g., IL-6
`and IL-8) from human ocular cells. Such formulations can
`be used to treat or prevent ocular neovascularization and
`non-allergic inflammatory disorders such as dry-eye,
`keratitis, blepharitis, uveitis and inflammation related to
`infection.
`
`14 Claims, No Drawings
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1004, Page 1
`
`

`
`US 6,174,914 B1
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`"The Lung," Scientific Foundations, Raven Press, Ltd., New
`York, Ch. 3.4.11 (1991).
`Cutarelli et al., "The Painful Eye External and Anteiror
`Segment Causes," Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, vol. 15 (1),
`pp. 103-112 (1999).
`
`Yanni et al., "Inhibition of Histamine—Induced Human Con-
`junctival Epithelial Cell Responses by Ocular Allergy
`Drugs," Arch. Ophthalmology, vol. 117, pp. 643-647
`(1999).
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1004, Page 2
`
`

`
`1
`METHOD OF INHIBITING CYTOKINE
`RELEASE FROM HUMAN OCULAR CELLS
`
`US 6,174,914 B1
`
`This application claims priority from co-pending U.S.
`Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/092,762, filed 5
`Jul. 14, 1998.
`
`15
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`1. Field of the Invention
`The present invention relates to ophthalmic pharmaceu-
`10
`tical formulations. More particularly, the present invention
`relates to therapeutic and prophylactic use of 11-(3-
`dimethylamino-propylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid for treating and/or preventing cytokine
`release from human ocular cells and resulting ocular neovas-
`cularization or non-allergic inflammatory conditions.
`2. Description of the Related Art
`As taught in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,871,865 and 4,923,892, both
`assigned to Burroughs Wellcome Co. ("the Burroughs
`Wellcome Patents"), certain carboxylic acid derivatives of 20
`doxepin, including 11-(3-dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-
`dihydrodibenz[b,e]oxepine-2-carboxylic acid and 11-(3-
`dimethylamino-propylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepine-2(E)-acrylic acid, have antihistaminic and
`antiasthmatic activity. These two patents classify the car-
`25
`boxylic acid derivatives of doxepin as mast cell stabilizers
`with antihistaminic action because they are believed to
`inhibit the release of autacoids (i.e., histamine, serotonin,
`and the like) from mast cells and to inhibit directly hista-
`mine's effects on target tissues. The Burroughs Wellcome 30
`Patents teach various pharmaceutical formulations contain-
`ing the carboxylic acid derivatives of doxepin; Example 8 (I)
`in both of the patents discloses an ophthalmic solution
`formulation.
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,116,863, assigned to Kyowa Hakko 35
`Kogyo Co., Ltd., ("the Kyowa patent"), teaches that acetic
`acid derivatives of doxepin, including Z-11-(3-
`dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid, have anti-allergic and anti-
`inflammatory activity. The anti-inflammatory activity is 40
`attributable to prostaglandin biosynthesis inhibiting activity
`(see Col. 28, lines 51-57). The doxepin derivatives disclosed
`by the Kyowa patent are represented by Compound (I):
`
`X— (CH2) Z
`
`(I) (cid:9)
`
`45
`
`50
`
`Compounds where X represents =N—, =CH— or
`—CH2— are described as having strong antiallergic activity,
`whereas compounds where X represents =N— are 55
`described as having strong antiinflammatory activity (see
`Col. 24, lines 20-57). Thus, for anti-inflammatory
`applications, the Kyowa patent suggests doxepin derivatives
`of Compound (I) where X is =N—.
`The Kyowa patent demonstrates anti-allergic activity and 60
`anti-inflammatory activity in Wistar male rats. Medicament
`forms taught by the Kyowa patent for the acetic acid
`derivatives of doxepin include a wide range of acceptable
`carriers; however, only oral and injection administration
`forms are mentioned. In the treatment of allergic eye disease, 65
`such as allergic conjunctivitis, such administration methods
`require large doses of medicine.
`
`2
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,805 discloses topical ophthalmic
`formulations containing 11-(3-dimethylamino-
`propylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]oxepin-2-acetic acid
`for treating allergic eye diseases.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention provides a method for treating or
`preventing ophthalmic neovascularization and non-allergic
`inflammatory disorders involving cytokine release from
`human ocular cells. The method comprises inhibiting cytok-
`ine release from human ocular cells by administering to the
`eye an ophthalmic formulation which contains a therapeu-
`tically (cid:9)
`effective (cid:9)
`amount (cid:9)
`of (cid:9)
`1 1 - ( 3 -
`dim e thyl am inop r op ylide ne) -6 ,11 - dihy dr o dib enz[b ,e ]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid (referred to as "Compound A"
`hereinafter) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
`The formulation may contain the cis isomer of Compound A
`(Z-11-(3-dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz-
`[b,e]oxepin-2-acetic acid), the trans isomer of Compound A
`(E -11 -(3 -dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz
`[b,e]oxepin-2-acetic acid), or a combination of both the cis
`and the trans isomers of Compound A. Unless specified
`otherwise, "11-(3-dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-
`dihydrodibenz-[b,e]oxepin-2-acetic acid" or "Compound A"
`means the cis isomer, the trans isomer or a mixture of both.
`"Cis isomer" means the cis isomer substantially free of the
`trans isomer; "trans isomer" means the trans isomer sub-
`stantially free of the cis isomer. One isomer is "substantially
`free" of the other isomer if less than about two percent of the
`unwanted isomer is present.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`Compound A is a known compound and both the cis and
`the trans isomers of Compound A can be obtained by the
`methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,116,863, the entire
`contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in
`the present specification.
`Examples of the pharmaceutically acceptable salts of
`Compound A include inorganic acid salts such as
`hydrochloride, hydrobromide, sulfate and phosphate;
`organic acid salts such as acetate, maleate, fumarate, tartrate
`and citrate; alkali metal salts such as sodium salt and
`potassium salt; alkaline earth metal salts such as magnesium
`salt and calcium salt; metal salts such as aluminum salt and
`zinc salt; and organic amine addition salts such as triethy-
`lamine addition salt (also known as tromethamine), mor-
`pholine addition salt and piperidine addition salt.
`Compound A may be administered to the eye in a variety
`of ways. The most preferred way is by means of conven-
`tional topical ophthalmic formulations, such as solutions,
`suspensions or gels. Alternatively, Compound A may be
`administered to the eye via injection or implant. Depending
`upon the type of formulation, conventional ingredients will
`be combined with Compound A. The preferred formulation
`for topical ophthalmic administration of Compound A is a
`solution administered as eye drops. The preferred form of
`Compound A in the ophthalmic formulations of the present
`invention is the cis isomer. A general method of preparing an
`eye drop formulation of the present invention is described
`below as a nonlimiting example.
`Compound A and an isotonic agent are added to sterilized
`purified water, and if required, a preservative, a buffering
`agent, a stabilizer, a viscous vehicle and the like are added
`to the solution and dissolved therein. The concentration of
`Compound A is 0.0001 to 5 w/v %, preferably 0.0001 to
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1004, Page 3
`
`

`
`US 6,174,914 B1
`
`3
`0.001 w/v %, and most preferably about 0.0005 w/v %,
`based on the sterilized purified water. After dissolution, the
`pH is adjusted with a pH controller to be within a range
`suitable for use as an ophthalmic medicine, preferably
`within the range of 4.5 to 8.
`Sodium chloride, glycerin, mannitol or the like may be
`used as the isotonic agent; p-hydroxybenzoic acid ester,
`benzalkonium chloride or the like as the preservative;
`sodium hydrogenphosphate, sodium dihydrogenphosphate,
`boric acid or the like as the buffering agent; sodium edetate
`or the like as the stabilizer; polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl
`pyrrolidone, polyacrylic acid or the like as the viscous
`vehicle; and sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid or the like
`as the pH controller.
`If required, other ophthalmic drugs such as epinephrine,
`naphazoline hydrochloride, berberine chloride, sodium
`azulenesulfonate, lysozyme chloride, glycyrrhizate and the
`like may be added.
`The eye drops produced by the above method typically
`need only be applied to the eyes a few times a day in an
`amount of one to several drops at a time, though in more
`severe cases the drops may be applied several times a day.
`A typical drop is about 30 /A.
`According to the method of the present invention, oph-
`thalmic formulations containing Compound A are used to
`inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion from human
`ocular cells, such as human conjunctival epithelial cells.
`This type of cytokine secretion (e.g., IL-6 and IL-8) can
`stimulate ocular neovascularization (see, for example,
`Yoshida et al., IOVS, 39:1097 (1998)) and other non-allergic
`inflammatory conditions, such as dry eye, keratitits,
`blepharitis, uveitis and inflammation related to infection, for
`example.
`Certain embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the
`following examples.
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`Preferred Topical Ophthalmic Solution Formulation
`
`Ingredient (cid:9)
`
`Concentration (W/V
`
`Compound A•HC1
`Dibasic Sodium Phosphate
`(Anhydrous), USP
`Sodium Chloride, USP
`Benzalkonium Chloride
`Sodium Hydroxide, NF
`Hydrochloric Acid, NF
`Purified Water (cid:9)
`
`0.111*
`0.5
`
`0.65
`0.01
`q.s. pH = 7.0
`q.s. pH = 7.0
`q.s. 100
`
`*0.111% Compound A•HC1 is equivalent to 0.1% Compound A
`
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`Topical Ophthalmic Gel Formulation
`
`Ingredient
`
`Concentration (W/V
`
`Compound A•HC1
`Carbopol 974 P
`Disodium EDTA
`Polysorbate 80
`Benzalkonium Chloride, Solution
`Sodium Hydroxide
`
`0.11*
`0.8
`0.01
`0.05
`0.01 + 5 xs
`q.s. pH 7.2
`
`4
`
`-continued
`
`Ingredient (cid:9)
`
`Hydrochloric acid (cid:9)
`Water for Injection (cid:9)
`
`Concentration (W/V
`
`q.s. pH 7.2
`q.s. 100
`
`*0.11% Compound A•HC1 is equivalent to 0.1% Compound A
`
`EXAMPLE 3
`
`5
`
`10
`
`30 (cid:9)
`
`Inhibition of Cytokine Release
`A. Human Conjunctival Epithelial Cell (HCE) Cultures.
`Methods detailing the preparation of primary epithelial
`15 cell cultures and cytokine release studies using these cells
`have been described. See Gamache, et al., "Secretion of
`proinflammatory cytokines by human conjunctival epithelial
`cells," Ocul Immunol Inflamm., 5:117-128 (1997). Briefly,
`cultures of human conjunctival epithelial cells were initiated
`20 from donor tissues obtained within eight hours post mortem
`by various eye banks. The tissues were enzymatically
`digested overnight. Epithelial cells were gently scraped from
`the tissue surface, dissociated into a single cell suspension,
`and cultured in keratinocyte growth medium (Clonetics®,
`25 San Diego, Calif.). Cells were used only through passage 6.
`Cultures were maintained in a preconfluent state to prevent
`differentiation. Cells were identified as epithelial by positive
`keratin staining.
`B. Cytokine Assays.
`Several compounds with histamine H1 antagonist activity
`were evaluated for their ability to inhibit secretion of cytok-
`ines (IL-6 and IL-8) from cultured human conjunctival
`epithelial cells in response to histamine stimulation. Cells
`were plated at 2x104 cells/well and cultured overnight at 5%
`35 CO2/37° C. The following day, fresh medium containing test
`compound was added directly to wells and the cells were
`incubated for 30 minutes prior to 24-hour stimulation with
`histamine (30 tiM). Three separate culture wells were used
`for each treatment group. At harvest, supernatants were
`40 collected, centrifuged at 200x g, and stored at —20° C.
`Samples were analyzed for IL-6 and IL-8 by ELISA (R&D
`Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.) as directed by the manufac-
`turer. The sensitivities of each ELISA are as follows: IL-6
`0.7 pg/ml and IL-8 3.0 pg/ml.
`45 C. Data Analysis
`The antagonist potency (IC„) was defined as the concen-
`tration of the drug required to produce 50% inhibition of the
`agonist-stimulated functional response. Data derived from
`the cytokine assays were calculated as mean and standard
`50 error (SEM) values which represent the variability among
`identically treated culture wells. The dose-dependent effect
`of pharmacological agents and IC„'s were determined by
`linear regression. Data are expressed as mean ±S.E.M. from
`3-5 independent experiments.
`55 D. Results.
`Exposure of HCE to 30 iM of histamine increased IL-6
`and IL-8 secretion 1.59±0.19 and 1.80±0.28 fold above
`basal levels, respectively. (Basal levels of the cytokines were
`153±42 pg/ml, n=4, for IL-6 and 197±48 pg/ml, n=6, for
`60 IL-8.)
`Treatment of HCE with drugs possessing anti-histaminic
`activity and available for topical ocular administration prior
`to histamine exposure resulted in concentration-dependent
`inhibition of IL-6 secretion and IL-8 secretion. The results
`65 are shown below in Table 1.
`The potency of emedastine in intact cells is consistent
`with its activity determined in receptor binding assays using
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1004, Page 4
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`
`US 6,174,914 B1
`
`5
`tissue homogenates. Levocabastine also inhibited the IL-6,
`and IL-8 secretion at a level consistent with its H1-receptor
`binding affinity Antazoline and pheniramine, two first gen-
`eration topical ocular anti-histamine compounds, were dra-
`matically less potent inhibitors of IL-6 and IL-8 secretion
`than predicted from their histamine H1-receptor binding
`affinities (20-140-fold). Olopatadine, however, was more
`potent than predicted from its published histamine
`H1-receptor binding affinity (36 nM). Olopatadine, antazo-
`line and pheniramine exhibit similar H1 binding affinities
`(32-39 nM). Yet, olopatadine was approximately 10-fold
`more potent as an inhibitor of cytokine secretion (IC„'s of
`5.5 nM and 1.7 nM for IL-6 and IL-8 secretion, respectively)
`than predicted from binding data. These results indicate that,
`unlike the other compounds tested, olopatadine's ability to
`inhibit cytokine secretion is attributable to something more
`than H1-receptor binding affinity.
`
`TABLE 1
`
`Histamine H1 Antagonists: Inhibition of IL-6 and IL-8 Secretion in
`Human Conjunctival Epithelial Cells and H, Receptor Binding Affinities
`
`H1 Antagonist
`
`Emedastinea
`Olopatadineb
`Levocabastinec
`Antazolined
`Pheniraminee
`
`IL-6
`IC, (nM)
`
`IL-8
`IC50 (nM)
`
`H1 Binding
`(nM)
`
`2.5
`5.5
`25.1
`1014
`4826
`
`4.0
`1.7
`11.9
`652
`1216
`
`1.22*
`36.0 §
`52.6 *
`38.4 *
`33.9 (cid:9) *
`
`a1H-Benzimidazole,1-(2-ethoxyethy0-2-(hexahydro-4-methy1-1H-1,4-
`diazepin-l-y1),(E)-2-butenedioate (1:2).
`bZ-11-(3-Dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz
`e( ) trans 1 [cis 4 Cyano 4 (p fluorophenyOcyclohexyll-3-methyl-4-
`phenylisonipecotic acid monohydrochloride.
`d4,5-Dihydro-N-phenyl-N-(phenylmethy0-1H-imidazole-2-methanamine.
`eN,N-Dimethyl-y-phenyl-2-pyridine-propanamine.
`* Sharif et al., J Ocul Pharmacol., 10:653-664 (1994)
`§ Yanni et al., Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol., 79:541-545 (1997)
`
`6
`4. The method of claim 3 wherein the amount of 11-(3-
`dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid is about 0.0005% (w/v).
`5. The method of claim 1 wherein the 11-(3-
`5 dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic (cid:9)
`acid (cid:9)
`is (cid:9)
`(Z)-11-(3-
`dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid, substantially free of (E)-11-(3-
`dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid.
`6. The method of claim 5 wherein the composition is a
`topically administrable solution and the amount of (Z)-11-
`(3-dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`15 oxepin-2-acetic acid is from about 0.0001 to about 5%
`(w/v).
`7. The method of claim 6 wherein the amount of (Z)-11-
`(3-dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid is from about 0.0001 to about 0.001%
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`(w/v ). 8.The method of claim 7 wherein the amount of (Z)-11-
`(3-dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid is 0.0005% (w/v).
`9. The method of claim 1 wherein the 11-(3-
`25 dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic (cid:9)
`acid
`is (cid:9)
`(E)-11-(3-
`dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid, substantially free of (Z)-11-(3-
`dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid.
`10. The method of claim 9 wherein the composition is a
`topically administrable composition and the amount of (E)-
`11-(3-dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid is from about 0.0001 to about 5%
`(w/v).
`11. The method of claim 10 wherein the amount of
`(E)-11-(3-dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz
`[b,e]oxepin-2-acetic acid is from about 0.0001 to about
`0.001% (w/v).
`12. The method of claim 11 wherein the amount of
`(E)-11-(3-dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz
`[b,e]oxepin-2-acetic acid is about 0.0005% (w/v).
`13. The method of claim 1 wherein the non-allergic
`ophthalmic inflammatory disorder is selected from the group
`consisting of dry eye, keratitits, blepharitis, uveitis and
`inflammation related to infection.
`14. The method of claim 1 wherein the ocular neovascu-
`larization and non-allergic ophthalmic inflammatory disor-
`ders involve cytokine release from human conjunctival
`epithelial cells.
`
`What is claimed is:
`1. A method of treating or preventing ocular neovascu-
`larization and non-allergic ophthalmic inflammatory disor-
`ders involving cytokine release from human ocular cells 40
`comprising the step of administering to the eye a composi-
`tion comprising a therapeutically-effective amount of 11-(3-
`dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
`thereof.
`2. The method of claim 1 wherein the composition is a
`topically administrable solution and the amount of 11-(3-
`dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid is from about 0.0001 w/v.% to about
`5% (w/v).
`3. The method of claim 2 wherein the amount of 11-(3-
`dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]
`oxepin-2-acetic acid is from about 0.0001 to about 0.001%
`(w/v).
`
`45
`
`50
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1004, Page 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket