`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 13
`Entered: August 22, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`ROSETTA-WIRELESS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2016-006221
`Patent 7,149,511 B1
`
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JUSTIN T. ARBES, PATRICK R. SCANLON, and
`JOHN A. HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`1 Case IPR2016-00616 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00622
`Patent 7,149,511 B1
`
`A. DUE DATES
`This order sets due dates for the parties to take action after institution
`of the proceeding. The parties may stipulate to different dates for DUE
`DATES 1 through 5 (earlier or later, but no later than DUE DATE 6). A
`notice of the stipulation, specifically identifying the changed due dates, must
`be promptly filed. The parties may not stipulate to an extension of DUE
`DATES 6 and 7.
`In stipulating to different times, the parties should consider the effect
`of the stipulation on times to object to evidence (37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)), to
`supplement evidence (37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2)), to conduct cross-
`examination (37 C.F.R. § 42.53(d)(2)), and to draft papers depending on the
`evidence and cross-examination testimony (see section B, below).
`The parties are reminded that the Testimony Guidelines appended to
`the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,772 (Aug.
`14, 2012) (Appendix D), apply to this proceeding. The Board may impose
`an appropriate sanction for failure to adhere to the Testimony Guidelines.
`37 C.F.R. § 42.12. For example, reasonable expenses and attorneys’ fees
`incurred by any party may be levied on a person who impedes, delays, or
`frustrates the fair examination of a witness.
`
`1. INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL
`No initial conference call is scheduled for this case. The parties are
`encouraged to contact the Board to request a call if any issues arise during
`trial. See Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,765–
`66 (Aug. 14, 2012) (setting forth guidance in preparing for the initial
`conference call). Patent Owner is reminded that it must confer with the
`Board before filing a Motion to Amend. 37 C.F.R. § 42.121(a). Patent
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00622
`Patent 7,149,511 B1
`
`Owner should contact the Board to request such a conference, if necessary,
`at least two weeks before DUE DATE 1.
`
`2. DUE DATE 1
`The patent owner may file—
`a.
`A response to the petition (37 C.F.R. § 42.120), and
`b.
`A motion to amend the patent (37 C.F.R. § 42.121).
`The patent owner must file any such response or motion to amend by DUE
`DATE 1. If the patent owner elects not to file anything, the patent owner
`must arrange a conference call with the parties and the Board. The patent
`owner is cautioned that any arguments for patentability not raised in the
`response will be deemed waived.
`
`3. DUE DATE 2
`The petitioner must file—
`a.
`Any reply to the patent owner’s response, and
`b.
`Any opposition to the motion to amend.
`The petitioner must file any such reply or opposition to the motion to amend
`by DUE DATE 2.
`
`4. DUE DATE 3
`The patent owner must file any reply to the petitioner’s opposition to
`patent owner’s motion to amend by DUE DATE 3.
`
`5. DUE DATE 4
`a.
`Each party must file any motion for an observation on the
`cross-examination testimony of a reply witness (see section C, below) by
`DUE DATE 4.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00622
`Patent 7,149,511 B1
`
`Each party must file any motion to exclude evidence (37 C.F.R
`b.
`§ 42.64(c)) and any request for oral argument (37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)) by
`DUE DATE 4.
`
`6. DUE DATE 5
`a.
`Each party must file any response to an observation on cross-
`examination testimony by DUE DATE 5.
`b.
`Each party must file any opposition to a motion to exclude
`evidence by DUE DATE 5.
`
`7. DUE DATE 6
`Each party must file any reply for a motion to exclude evidence by
`DUE DATE 6.
`
`8. DUE DATE 7
`The oral argument (if requested by either party) is set for DUE
`DATE 7.
`
`B. CROSS-EXAMINATION
`Except as the parties might otherwise agree, for each due date—
`1.
`Cross-examination begins after any supplemental evidence is
`due. 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(d)(2).
`2.
`Cross-examination ends no later than a week before the filing
`date for any paper in which the cross-examination testimony is expected to
`be used. Id.
`
`C. MOTION FOR OBSERVATION ON CROSS-EXAMINATION
`A motion for observation on cross-examination provides the parties
`with a mechanism to draw the Board’s attention to relevant cross-
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00622
`Patent 7,149,511 B1
`
`examination testimony of a reply witness because no further substantive
`paper is permitted after the reply. See Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77
`Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). The observation must be a
`concise statement of the relevance of precisely identified testimony to a
`precisely identified argument or portion of an exhibit. Each observation
`should not exceed a single, short paragraph. The opposing party may
`respond to the observation. Any response must be equally concise and
`specific.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00622
`Patent 7,149,511 B1
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL ............................................................. N/A
`
`DUE DATE 1 .................................................................. November 23, 2016
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ..................................................................... February 23, 2017
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 ......................................................................... March 23, 2017
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 ........................................................................... April 13, 2017
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ........................................................................... April 27, 2017
`Response to observation
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 .............................................................................. May 4, 2017
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ............................................................................ May 18, 2017
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00622
`Patent 7,149,511 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`Megan F. Raymond
`J. Steven Baughman
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`Megan.Raymond@ropesgray.com
`steven.baughman@ropesgray.com
`
`Brian E. Ferguson
`Anish R. Desai
`Megan H. Wantland
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`Brian.Ferguson@weil.com
`Anish.Desai@weil.com
`Megan.Wantland@weil.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Miranda Y. Jones
`Michael F. Heim
`HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, L.L.P.
`mjones@hpcllp.com
`mheim@hpcllp.com
`
`7