throbber

`United States Patent No.: 7,149,511
`Inventors: Edward F. Bachner III,
`John Major, Xin Du
`Formerly Application No.: 09/652,734
`Issue Date: December 12, 2006
`Filing Date: August 31, 2000
`Former Group Art Unit: 2617
`Former Examiner: Keith Ferguson
`









`
`Attorney Docket No.:
`110797-0020-651
`Customer No.: 28120
`
`Petitioners: SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC., and APPLE
`INC.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`For: WIRELESS INTELLIGENT PERSONAL SERVER
`
`MAIL STOP PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Post Office Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. INGRID HSIEH-YEE
`
`
`
`-1-
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1029 Page 00001
`
`

`

`I, Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and I am competent
`
`to testify to the same.
`
`2.
`
`I am currently a Professor in the Department of Library and Information
`
`Science at the Catholic University of America. I have experience working in an
`
`academic library, a medical library, and a legislative library and have been a
`
`professor for more than 25 years. I hold a Ph.D. in Library and Information Studies
`
`from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a Masters in Library and
`
`Information Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. I am an authority
`
`on library cataloging and classification and have published two books on this
`
`subject, Organizing Audiovisual and Electronic Resources for Access: A
`
`Cataloging Guide (2000, 2006). I teach a variety of courses, including “Cataloging
`
`and Classification,” “Internet Searches and Web Design,” “Advanced Cataloging
`
`and Classification,” “Organization of Internet Resources,” and “Digital Content
`
`Creation and Management.” My research
`
`interests cover cataloging and
`
`classification,
`
`information organization, metadata,
`
`information
`
`retrieval,
`
`information architecture, digital collections, user interaction with information
`
`systems, and others.
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`Page 00002
`
`

`

`3. My curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit A. I am being compensated at
`
`my normal hourly rate of $160 per hour for my work on this matter, and I have not
`
`testified as an expert at deposition or trial previously. My compensation is not
`
`contingent upon the results of my study, the substance of my opinions, or the
`
`outcome of any proceeding involving this matter.
`
`4.
`
`In forming my opinions, I have reviewed the exhibits referenced below, each
`
`of these is a type of material that experts in my field would reasonably rely upon
`
`when forming their opinions. As further confirmation of my opinions, I reviewed
`
`records from the FirstSearch system of OCLC Online Computer Library Center
`
`and a letter from OCLC confirming the dates on which the three publications in
`
`questions were entered and indexed in the WorldCat system. As further
`
`confirmation of my opinions, I had e-mail communications with Tricia W.
`
`Mackenzie, Head of Resource Description and Metadata Services at George Mason
`
`University Library, who provided information an expert in the field would
`
`reasonably rely on.
`
`5.
`
`I am fully familiar with a library cataloging standard known as the
`
`“Machine-Readable Cataloging” standard, also known as “MARC,” which is an
`
`industry-wide standard method of storing and organizing
`
`library catalog
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`Page 00003
`
`

`

`information. MARC is the primary communications protocol for the transfer and
`
`storage of bibliographic metadata in libraries.
`
`6.
`
`Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) is the largest bibliographic
`
`network in the world. When an OCLC participating institution acquires a work, it
`
`creates a MARC record for this work in OCLC’s Connexion system, the
`
`bibliographic system used by catalogers to create MARC records, and Connexion
`
`automatically supplies the date when a record is entered into the system. After a
`
`MARC record is entered into Connexion, it becomes available to other OCLC
`
`participating members in Connexion and visible to the public on WorldCat, a Web
`
`search portal of OCLC. WorldCat provides a user-friendly interface for the public
`
`to use the data elements of MARC records without the need to know MARC tags
`
`and codes. WorldCat also provides information on libraries near a searcher that
`
`carry the books the searcher is looking for.
`
`7.
`
`A MARC record contains several fields, each of which contains specific data
`
`about the work. For example, a work’s title is recorded in Field 245. In the Fixed
`
`Field, several data elements encode basic metadata such as language, year of
`
`publication, and date of record entry into OCLC Connexion, and these data
`
`elements are labeled. The date of record entry is of most relevance to this case.
`
`Libraries rely on MARC records to help the public understand their collections,
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`Page 00004
`
`

`

`and many libraries display MARC records on their online catalogs with labels for
`
`the data elements to help the public interpret MARC records. Many libraries also
`
`offer an option to display MARC records in MARC tags. For example, Field 100
`
`indicates author information and Field 250 indicates edition statement. The first six
`
`spaces of Field 008 present the date when the record was first entered into OCLC.
`
`8.
`
`I used authoritative databases such as the online catalog at the Library of
`
`Congress, and WorldCat on the Web to confirm citation details of the references
`
`identified in this declaration. I also used the online catalogs for George Mason
`
`University and North Carolina State University to examine their MARC records
`
`for these three publications. Experts in the field would reasonably rely on the data
`
`described herein to establish a date when a publication becomes available to the
`
`public in the libraries.
`
`9.
`
`The Library of Congress (“LC”) is the national library of the United States.
`
`Its bibliographic records are highly valued by libraries around the world, and are
`
`often used to derive records at non-LC libraries. I understand that the Library of
`
`Congress has been building its collections mainly through the copyright
`
`registration process. I further understand that United States copyright law mandates
`
`that the owner of copyright deposit copies of works published in the United States
`
`with the Copyright Office, which is housed within the Library of Congress, within
`
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`Page 00005
`
`

`

`three months after the date of such publication in accordance with the Copyright
`
`Act of 1976.
`
`10.
`
`I understand Exhibit 1030 is a copy of “Windows CE Developer’s
`
`Handbook” by Terence A. Goggin (hereinafter, “Goggin Reference”), which I
`
`understand was obtained from the Library of Congress. The Goggin Reference
`
`reflects a copyright year of 1999. Exhibit 1030 is “copy 2” from the Library of
`
`Congress’ collection, which means that it was the second copy of the Goggin
`
`Reference the Library of Congress received.
`
`11. The fifth page of Exhibit 1030 is marked with a Library of Congress
`
`Copyright Office stamp that bears the date “DEC 01 1999” or December 1, 1999.
`
`Experts in the field would reasonably understand the date indicated on the Library
`
`of Congress Copyright Office stamp to be the date when the Copyright Office
`
`received the book. Exhibit B is a record from the Copyright Office’s public
`
`catalog for the Goggin Reference, which I downloaded and which shows that the
`
`Goggin Reference was published in April 28, 1999.
`
`12. Exhibit C shows the online catalog information for the Goggin Reference at
`
`the Library of Congress, including a MARC record. Field 260 indicates the work
`
`was published with a copyright date of 1999, and the first six digits of Field 008
`
`shows that the record was entered into the OCLC Connexion in “990219”
`
`
`
`
`-6-
`
`Page 00006
`
`

`

`(meaning February 19, 1999). The MARC record’s OCLC number is presented in
`
`Field 035 as “41518839.” Field 955 is used by the Library of Congress to track the
`
`movement of materials within the Library of Congress. In this case, Field 955
`
`contains a number of entries, including “jf09 to subj 8-5-99,” which shows the
`
`Goggin Reference went through subject cataloging stages in August 1999. Field
`
`955 also includes an entry that states “copy 2 added jf16 to BCCD 03-22-00,”
`
`which shows that copy 2 was added to the Library of Congress’ collection on “03-
`
`22-00” (meaning March 22, 2000).
`
`13. The fact that the MARC record was created in February 1999 before the
`
`physical book was published on April 28, 1999 (see Exhibit B) is likely a reflection
`
`of the way Cataloging-in-Publication (CIP) records are usually created. A CIP
`
`record is a bibliographic record created by the Library of Congress in advance of
`
`publication. Only U.S. publishers who publish titles most likely to be widely
`
`acquired by U.S. libraries are eligible to participate in the CIP program. If a
`
`publisher would like to include CIP data in a publication, they can send the core
`
`required materials or the galley proof of that publication to the Library of Congress
`
`and the staff at the CIP program will create a CIP MARC record for the publisher
`
`to include in the actual publication. When the book is published, the publisher is
`
`obligated to immediately send a physical copy of the published book to the Library
`
`of Congress, the CIP record will then be updated with more data from the
`
`
`
`
`-7-
`
`Page 00007
`
`

`

`published copy. Publishers have found that books with CIP data tend to sell better,
`
`so there is a strong incentive to work with the Library of Congress to have CIP
`
`records created. In this case, it is likely that a CIP record was created in February
`
`1999 (per Field 008), then the book was published in April 1999 (per Exhibit B),
`
`and after that the published book was passed on to various cataloging staff in
`
`August 1999 to add details to the record (per Field 955). When copy 2 was
`
`“added” to the collection on “3-22-00” (meaning March 22, 2000), it was noted in
`
`Field 955. Of course, based on the December 1, 1999 Copyright Office date stamp,
`
`the Library of Congress had possession of the book well-before March 22, 2000.
`
`14.
`
`I understand that Exhibit D is a letter from David Valentine-Elam, a Senior
`
`Attorney at OCLC, which confirms that the Goggin Reference was indexed by
`
`WorldCat on February 19, 1999. Exhibit E is a detailed record from OCLC’s
`
`FirstSearch system, which further confirms that the Goggin Reference was entered
`
`into WorldCat on February 19, 1999.
`
`15. Based on the information above, it is my opinion that the MARC record for
`
`the Goggin Reference was accessible to the public (cataloged) as early as February
`
`19, 1999 and the physical copy was accessible to the public no later than March 22,
`
`2000 when copy 2 was added to the collection, and thus available on the shelves
`
`
`
`
`-8-
`
`Page 00008
`
`

`

`or, at minimum, could have been requested from a librarian at the Library of
`
`Congress.
`
`16.
`
`I understand Exhibit F is a copy of excerpts of the Goggin Reference, which
`
`I understand was obtained from the George Mason University Library. Exhibit F
`
`has a copyright date of 1999.
`
`17. Exhibit G shows the online catalog information for the Goggin Reference at
`
`the George Mason University Library, including a MARC record. Field 260
`
`indicates the work was published with a copyright date of 1999, and the first six
`
`digits of Field 008 shows that the record was entered into the OCLC Connexion in
`
`“990823” (meaning August 23, 1999). The MARC record’s OCLC number is
`
`presented in Field 035 as “41518839.”
`
`18.
`
`I further learned from e-mail communication with Ms. Tricia W. Mackenzie,
`
`Head of Resource Description and Metadata Services at George Mason University
`
`Library, that the Goggin Reference was added to George Mason University
`
`Library’s collection on September 17, 1999. She informed me that the general
`
`practice of George Mason University Library is to add a book to its library shelves
`
`two to four days after a cataloging record is created for the book. Based on my
`
`experience and expertise, it is customary and industry practice for a library to make
`
`
`
`
`-9-
`
`Page 00009
`
`

`

`a book available to the public shortly after the library creates a cataloging record
`
`for it.
`
`19. Based on the information above, it is my opinion that the Goggin Reference
`
`was accessible to the public (e.g., searchable in the library catalog and available in
`
`the library) on September 17, 1999 at George Mason University Library.
`
`20.
`
`I examined the copies of the Goggin Reference that I understand were
`
`obtained from the Library of Congress and George Mason University Library, and
`
`it is my opinion that they are in a condition that creates no suspicion about their
`
`authenticity and that they were found in places (i.e., libraries) where, if authentic,
`
`they would likely be. They appeared internally consistent with no indication of
`
`having been fabricated or altered.
`
`21.
`
`I understand Exhibit H is a copy of excerpts of “Essential Windows CE
`
`Application Programming” by Robert Burdick (hereinafter, “Burdick Reference”),
`
`which I understand was obtained from the Library of Congress. The Burdick
`
`Reference reflects a copyright year of 1999.
`
`22. The ninth page of Exhibit H is marked with a Library of Congress CIP
`
`stamp that bears the date “MAR 22, 1999” or March 22, 1999. Experts in the field
`
`would reasonably understand the date is an indication of when the published book
`
`was received by the CIP Program.
`
`
`
`
`-10-
`
`Page 00010
`
`

`

`23. Exhibit I shows the online catalog information for the Burdick Reference at
`
`the Library of Congress, including a MARC record. Field 260 indicates the work
`
`was published in 1999, and the first six digits of Field 008 shows that the record
`
`was created on “981207” (meaning December 7, 1998).
`
`24. The fact that the MARC record was first created in December 1998 while
`
`the book was published in 1999 may be a reflection of the Cataloging-in-
`
`Publication practice described in Paragraph 13 above. This is further supported by
`
`the fact that the copyright page of the Burdick Reference (the ninth page of Exhibit
`
`H) includes “Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.” The date
`
`stamp discussed in Paragraph 22 above indicates the arrival of the physical
`
`published copy of the Burdick Reference on March 22, 1999, and Field 955
`
`reflects “CIP ver. pv08 04-08-99,” which shows that the CIP record was revised on
`
`“04-08-99” (April 8, 1999).
`
`25.
`
`I understand that Exhibit D is a letter from David Valentine-Elam, a Senior
`
`Attorney at OCLC Online Computer Library Center, which confirms that the
`
`Burdick Reference was indexed by WorldCat on December 7, 1998. Exhibit J is a
`
`detailed record from OCLC’s FirstSearch system, which further confirms that the
`
`Burdick Reference was entered into WorldCat on December 7, 1998, and has an
`
`OCLC number 40473691.
`
`
`
`
`-11-
`
`Page 00011
`
`

`

`26. Based on the information above, it is my opinion that the Burdick Reference
`
`was accessible to the public (e.g., searchable in the library catalog and available in
`
`the library) no later than April 8, 1999 at the Library of Congress.
`
`27.
`
`I understand Exhibit 1031 is a copy of the Burdick Reference, which I
`
`understand was obtained from the George Mason University Library. Exhibit
`
`1031 has a copyright date of 1999.
`
`28. Exhibit K shows the online catalog information for the Burdick Reference
`
`at the George Mason University Library, including a MARC record. Field 260
`
`indicates the work was published in 1999, and the first six digits of Field 008
`
`shows that the record was entered into the OCLC Connexion in “981207”
`
`(meaning December 7, 1998). The MARC record’s OCLC number is 40473691.
`
`29.
`
`I further learned from e-mail communication with Ms. Tricia W. Mackenzie,
`
`Head of Resource Description and Metadata Services at George Mason University
`
`Library, that the Burdick Reference was added to George Mason University
`
`Library’s collection on September 17, 1999. She informed me that the general
`
`practice of George Mason University Library is to add a book to its library shelves
`
`two to four days after a cataloging record is created for the book. Based on my
`
`experience and expertise, it is customary and industry practice for a library to make
`
`
`
`
`-12-
`
`Page 00012
`
`

`

`a book available to the public shortly after the library creates a cataloging record
`
`for it.
`
`30. Based on the information above, it is my opinion that the Burdick Reference
`
`was accessible to the public (e.g., searchable in the library catalog and available in
`
`the library) on September 17, 1999 at George Mason University Library.
`
`31.
`
`I understand Exhibit L is a copy of excerpts of the Burdick Reference,
`
`which I understand was obtained from the North Carolina State University Library.
`
`Exhibit L has a copyright date of 1999.
`
`32. Exhibit M shows the online catalog information for the Burdick Reference
`
`at the North Carolina State University Library, including a MARC record. Field
`
`260 indicates the work was published in 1999, and the first six digits of Field 008
`
`shows that the record was entered into the OCLC Connexion in “981207”
`
`(meaning December 7, 1998). The MARC record’s OCLC number is 40473691.
`
`33. The third page of Exhibit L has a checkout slip that lists dates when the
`
`book was due to be returned to the library. The earliest date on this slip is “Nov 06
`
`1999” indicating the book was available at the North Carolina State University
`
`Library sometime before November 6, 1999.
`
`
`
`
`-13-
`
`Page 00013
`
`

`

`34. Based on the information above, it is my opinion that the Burdick Reference
`
`was accessible to the public (e.g., searchable in the library catalog and available in
`
`the library) no later than November 6, 1999 at the North Carolina State University
`
`Library.
`
`35.
`
`I examined the copies of the Burdick Reference that I understand were
`
`obtained from the Library of Congress, George Mason University Library, and the
`
`North Carolina State University Library, and it is my opinion that they are in a
`
`condition that creates no suspicion about their authenticity and that they were
`
`found in places (i.e., libraries) where, if authentic, they would likely be. They
`
`appeared internally consistent with no indication of having been fabricated or
`
`altered.
`
`36.
`
` I understand Exhibit 1032 is a copy of “Programming Microsoft Windows
`
`CE,” by Douglas Boling (hereinafter, the “Boling Reference”), which I understand
`
`was obtained from the North Carolina State University Library. Page 0004 of
`
`Exhibit 1032 has a checkout slip that lists dates when the book was due to be
`
`returned to the library. The earliest date on this slip is “Jun 07 1999” indicating the
`
`book was available at the North Carolina State University Library sometime before
`
`June 7, 1999.
`
`
`
`
`-14-
`
`Page 00014
`
`

`

`37. Exhibit N shows the online catalog information for the Boling Reference at
`
`the North Carolina State University Library, including a MARC record. Field 260
`
`indicates the work was published in 1998, and the first six digits of Field 008 show
`
`that the record was entered into the OCLC Connexion in “980810” (meaning
`
`August 10, 1998).
`
`38.
`
`I understand that Exhibit D is a letter from David Valentine-Elam, a Senior
`
`Attorney at OCLC Online Computer Library Center, which confirms that the
`
`Boling Reference was indexed by WorldCat on August 10, 1998. Exhibit O is a
`
`detailed record from OCLC’s FirstSearch system, which further confirms that the
`
`Boling Reference was entered into WorldCat on August 10, 1998.
`
`39. Based on the information above, it is my opinion that the Boling Reference
`
`was accessible to the public (e.g., searchable in the library catalog and available in
`
`the library) no later than June 7, 1999 at the North Carolina State University
`
`Library.
`
`40.
`
`I reviewed the copy of the Boling Reference that I understand was obtained
`
`from the North Carolina State University Library, and it is my opinion that it is in a
`
`condition that creates no suspicion about its authenticity and that it is in a place
`
`(i.e., a library) where, if authentic, it would likely be. It appeared internally
`
`consistent with no indication of having been fabricated or altered.
`
`
`
`
`-15-
`
`Page 00015
`
`

`

`41.
`
`I have been warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable
`
`by fine or imprisonment or both.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on this 12th day ofFebruary, 2016 in Washington, DC .
`
`....
`
`-16-
`
`Page 00016
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket