`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at Kobre & Kim LLP, 150 California, 19th Floor,
`
`San Francisco, California 94111, which has been retained by Patent Owner
`
`Rosetta-Wireless Corporation in this inter partes review.
`
`2.
`
`I make this affidavit in support of Patent Owner’s application for my
`
`admission pro hac vice.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the bar in California. I am also
`
`duly admitted and authorized to practice law before the United States District
`
`Court for the Northern District of California, United States District Court for the
`
`Eastern District of California, United States District Court for the Eastern District
`
`of Texas, United States Court of the Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, United States
`
`Court of the Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and United States Supreme Court.
`
`4.
`
`I have not had any application denied for admission to practice, nor
`
`have I been sanctioned, cited for contempt, suspended or disbarred from practice,
`
`before any court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`If admitted pro hac vice in this matter, I will serve as counsel with
`
`Miranda Y. Jones and Michael F. Heim of the law firm of Heim, Payne &
`
`Chorush, L.L.P. Ms. Jones is lead counsel on this case and is registered to practice
`
`before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”).
`
`6.
`
`I understand that, upon admission pro hac vice, I will be subject to the
`
`Rosetta-2014
`
`0001
`
`
`
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.
`
`8.
`
`I hereby agree to notify the Board immediately of any matter affecting
`
`my standing at the bar of any other Court.
`
`9.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in any other matter before
`
`the Office in the last three years.
`
`10.
`
`I have an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding, having represented Patent Owner in District Court proceedings
`
`involving the same technology (Rosetta-Wireless Corp. v. Apple Inc. et al., No. 15-
`
`cv-00799, (N.D.Ill) and Rosetta-Wireless Corp. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et
`
`al., No. 15-cv-10605, (N.D.Ill)). I have carefully studied the patent-in-suit,
`
`including its prosecution history, and have conducted many interviews with the
`
`inventors regarding their invention, the prosecution history and the patent. I am
`
`intimately familiar with the positions taken by the petitioners and the other
`
`defendants in the above litigation, and have provided counsel to the inventors in
`
`connection with litigation involving a foreign counterpart in the United Kingdom.
`
`More generally, I am an experienced patent litigator, having litigated numerous
`
`patent infringement cases, for both plaintiffs and defendants, at both the district
`
`
`
`
`
`0002
`
`
`
`court and Federal Circuit levels. I have, for example, served as trial and appellate
`
`counsel for the Australian national science agency, Commonwealth Scientific and
`
`Industrial Research Organisation, including in the currently pending CSIRO v.
`
`Cisco, Eastern District of Texas Case No. 6-11-cv-343 and Federal Circuit Case
`
`No. 15-1066.
`
`11.
`
`I hereby respectfully request that the Board grant Patent Owner
`
`Rosetta-Wireless Corporation’s application to permit me to appear and participate
`
`pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`12.
`
`I understand that willful false statements and the like are punishable
`
`by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and may jeopardize the
`
`validity of the application or any patent issuing thereon. I declare under penalty of
`
`perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Executed on May 31, 2016
`
`/s/ Daniel A. Zaheer
`Daniel A. Zaheer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0003
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
