throbber
ELSEV IER
`
`Catalysis Today 62 (2000) 35 -50
`
`CATALYSIS
`TODAY
`
`www.elsevier.com/locate/cattod
`
`Twenty -five years after introduction
`of automotive catalysts: what next?
`M. Shele`, R.W. McCabe
`Chemical and Physical Sciences Laboratory, Ford Research Laboratory,
`Ford Motor Company, MD -3179, SRL, PO Box 2053, Dearborn, MI 48121, USA
`
`Abstract
`
`The union of catalysts and the automobile has been one of the greatest successes of heterogeneous catalysis over the last 25
`years. Here, the history of automotive catalysis is briefly reviewed, followed by an assessment of where automotive catalysis
`stands today and where it is headed in the future. A key distinction between past automotive catalysis experience and that
`projected for the future is an increased focus on catalysts in upstream of power plant applications, such as on -board fuel
`processing units for fuel cell vehicles. Driven by ever tighter regulations, there will be continued research and development
`activity focused also on downstream applications (i.e. exhaust emission aftertreatment), especially for fuel -efficient, lean -burn
`vehicles, both diesel and spark- ignited. C 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Automotive catalysts; Heterogeneous catalysis; On -board fuel processing units
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Automotive catalysts designed to detoxify the ex-
`haust were implemented in production in US on
`vehicles of the model year 1975 and, as we are reach-
`ing a full quarter century of their use, there is ample
`information available to allow us to declare that these
`devices, which are the principal emission control
`tools, have proved to be an unqualified success. Fol-
`lowing the positive experience in US, in short order
`Japan and thereafter Europe, in 1986, adopted the
`use of automotive catalysts. Less affluent developing
`societies have come to the realization that emission
`control in heavily populated areas is not a costly frill
`but a tangible benefit for the quality of life and the use
`of automotive catalysts is rapidly spreading around
`the globe. Even a subjective, casual visitor to urban
`
`* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1- 313- 337 -4041;
`fax: +1- 313 -248 -5627.
`E -mail address: mshelef @ford.com (M. Shelef).
`
`centers where these devices have not yet been widely
`implemented will quickly notice the difference in air
`quality. The ubiquity of automobiles, and by exten-
`sion of catalysts, has made catalysts and their function
`much more familiar to the population at large.
`This paper, touches briefly on the development this
`scientific /technological effort has traversed, where it
`stands now, and what can be discerned on the horizon.
`The field is driven by environmental issues whose aim
`is to mitigate the undesirable side effects of modern
`lifestyle. Personal mobility is considered an essential
`part of this lifestyle and has come to be viewed as
`almost an inalienable right. The national and interna-
`tional regulatory bodies serve diligently as "enforcers"
`by promulgating ever more stringent emission rules so
`that the field of automotive catalysis is perpetually at
`the very edge of technology.
`In the past, vehicular emission abatement was con-
`cerned mainly with (1) the residual uncombusted hy-
`drocarbons (HC), (2) the partial combustion product
`
`- carbon monoxide (CO), (3) nitrogen oxides (NOi)
`
`0920 -5861/00/$ - see front matter CO 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`PII: S0920- 5861(00)00407 -7
`
`BASF-2011.001
`
`

`
`36
`
`M Shelef, R.W. McCabe /Catalysis Today 62 (2000) 35 -50
`
`formed from atmospheric nitrogen during combustion,
`and (4) particulate matter (PM), especially carbona-
`ceous particulate formed in diesel engines. Presently
`the overriding concern is shifting to the unavoidable
`product of energy generation from carbonaceous fos-
`
`sil fuels - carbon dioxide (CO2), a molecule whose
`
`concentration in the atmosphere has continuously risen
`since the beginning of the fossil fuels era and which,
`allegedly, is implicated in the "global warming" trend.
`It so happens that every remedy proposed to mitigate
`the amount of CO2 produced by automotive vehicles
`is associated with a catalytic process, either on -board
`or off -board the vehicle. Hence, when discussing the
`developments on the horizon, we include these under
`the overall umbrella of automotive catalysts.
`
`2. Early developments
`
`The reader is referred to a number of previous
`reviews that treat in more detail developments during
`the early stages of automotive exhaust catalysis [1 -6].
`Here we confine ourselves to a brief recap of major is-
`sues and developments that shaped the course of tech-
`nological development. The decision to put catalysts
`on vehicles was preceded by a lengthy gestation period
`during which a series of hurdles had to be overcome
`and there were also a few false starts. It had long been
`recognized, given a hot enough exhaust stream and
`an excess of oxygen, that several materials, especially
`noble metals and even some base metal combinations,
`might be sufficiently active to afford the oxidation of
`the unburned HC and CO on a catalyst placed in the
`exhaust downstream of the engine. To begin with, all
`the parties on whose business the implementation of
`catalytic exhaust after treatment impinged were con-
`cerned with the economic consequences. The overall
`perception was that the consumer would be saddled
`with excessive costs for measures whose actual value
`was not altogether clear. This perception was equally
`shared by the automotive industry and by the fuel pro-
`ducers, both of whose businesses would be affected.
`The apprehensions were many, the most prominent
`among these being: (a) can a catalyst survive the harsh
`environment of the exhaust ?; (b) if not, because of
`the poisoning by lead, could the use of antiknock lead
`compounds in gasoline be dispensed with? (note that
`in its time the introduction of lead antiknock corn-
`
`pounds was hailed as a tremendous step forward which
`inter alía allowed the allied air superiority in WWII);
`(c) if base metals were not up to the task, lacking suf-
`ficient activity or being deactivated by sulfur, would
`there be enough affordable noble metals available?
`Faced with the passage of laws stipulating defi-
`nite limits on exhaust pollution, research efforts were
`redoubled and solutions to these problems gradually
`emerged. Lead was virtually legislated out of auto-
`motive fuel, this being based on its incompatibility
`with catalytic converters (although one can surmise
`that it would have been, in time, removed because
`of its adverse health effects). The octane quality of
`automotive fuels did not deteriorate as improved re-
`fining methods were implemented to compensate for
`the removal of lead. The list of catalytic elements
`having sufficient activity was indeed narrowed down
`to the noble metals and new mining and metal refin-
`ing facilities were contracted for at affordable costs.
`The worries about irretrievably squandering a unique
`natural resource were, to a large extent, mitigated by
`the prospect of recycling the metals from converters
`removed from cars consigned to scrap. Finally, the
`survivability of the catalysts in the field was ascer-
`tained by field tests, including a 450 -car field trial
`carried out by Ford in California in 1974 [7]. As is
`the case with every new technology, the early years
`of use witnessed catalyst failures due to misfueling,
`upstream engine and system malfunctions, etc., which
`were corrected as the experience with catalyst use was
`accumulated. At present, the reliability of catalysts
`equals that of other automotive components. This is
`an important issue since governmental regulations
`require proper functionality of emission systems for
`100 000 miles of use (120 000 miles for trucks).
`The combined requirements of compactness, high
`volumetric flow rates and low back pressure led to the
`adoption of a monolithic embodiment for automotive
`catalysts, quite different from the packed -bed forms
`that prevailed in almost all industrial and petroleum
`catalysis. The monoliths were multi -channeled ce-
`ramic catalyst bodies (square, triangular or honey-
`comb channel configurations), with the exhaust gas
`flowing through the channels on whose walls there is a
`coated high surface area porous layer with finely dis-
`persed noble metal catalytic particles. (At the dawn of
`the implementation period, some manufacturers stuck
`to the more familiar granular catalysts. In use, these
`
`BASF-2011.002
`
`

`
`M Shelef, R.W. McCabe /Catalysis Today 62 (2000) 35 -50
`
`37
`
`catalyst granules or beads suffered from attrition and
`ultimately were abandoned in favor of the monoliths
`because of this and also poorer warm -up characteris-
`tics.) Presently, monolithic catalysts (mostly ceramic
`but also metallic in some special instances) are uni-
`versally used in automotive catalysis. Moreover, the
`"monolith" catalytic technology is migrating into the
`realm of industrial catalysis, most often in processes
`for treatment of industrial effluents.
`
`3. Which precious metals?
`
`The choice of precious metals (synonymous to no-
`ble metals or platinum group metals) as the active cat-
`alytic materials in automotive materials was the result
`of three factors: (a) only the precious metals had the
`required activity needed for the removal of the pollu-
`tants in the very short residence times dictated by the
`large volumetric flows of the exhaust in relation to the
`size of catalyst which could be accommodated in the
`available space; (b) the precious metals were the only
`catalytic materials with the requisite resistance to poi-
`soning by residual amounts of sulfur oxides in the ex-
`haust; (c) the precious metals were less prone (but not
`entirely immune) to deactivation by high -temperature
`interaction with the insulator oxides of Al, Ce, Zr,
`etc., which constitute the so- called high surface area
`"washcoat" on which the active catalytic components
`are dispersed. While initially Pt and Pd in various
`proportions were used as oxidation catalysts, Rh was
`introduced with the advent of the three -way catalysts,
`having considerably better activity than Pt or Pd for the
`catalytic reduction of the oxides of nitrogen [8 -11].
`In a short time span, the automotive use of Rh
`accounted for the bulk of its production in the world
`and, since it is produced along with Pt at a more or
`less constant ratio, market demand created sharp price
`spikes. Pd has historically traded at much lower prices
`than Pt and Rh owing to sources outside South Africa,
`such as Russia, Canada, and US. Efforts to substitute
`Pd for Pt and/or Rh on a large scale were thwarted,
`however, by technical limitations, namely increased
`sensitivity of Pd relative to Pt and Rh to poisoning by
`lead and sulfur. By the late 1980s, residual lead lev-
`els in US unleaded. gasoline had dropped to levels at
`which Pd could be implemented as a substitute for Pt.
`Ford introduced Pd/Rh catalysts in some of its models
`
`in California in 1989, replacing the long -standing use
`of Pt /Rh in three -way catalysis (TWC) formulations.
`The use of Pd /Rh catalyst technology quickly spread
`within US, spurred on by improvements in techniques
`for segregating Pd and Rh into separate washcoat lay-
`ers, this being to prevent the deleterious formation of
`bimetallic Pd -Rh particles. Introduction of Pd /Rh cat-
`alysts in Europe and other markets has been much
`slower due to a much more gradual process of elimi-
`nating the sale of leaded fuels.
`A resurgence in environmental awareness in the
`late 1980s led US to the Clean Air Act of 1990 and
`a corresponding enactment of stricter emission reg-
`ulations in Europe. These initiatives, in turn, greatly
`increased the worldwide demand for noble metals.
`While increased use of Pd as a substitute for Pt took
`some of the pressure off of Pt, Rh was still in very
`great demand and its price became unstable, peaking
`at $7000 /troy -oz in July of 1992 (compared to histori-
`cal levels of ca. $1000- $1500). While the high prices
`were only temporary and to a large extent specula-
`tive, there was growing concern over the ability of
`the automotive industry to sustain long -term use of
`Rh at levels higher than the mine ratio. Clearly, an
`alternative to Rh was needed.
`The alternative to Rh came in the form of Pd but
`Pd deployed in ways different than before, using con-
`siderably higher loadings. At one point, Allied Signal
`researchers claimed equivalence between a Pd -only
`catalyst at 56.7 g /ft3 loading and a 5:1 Pt/Rh catalyst
`at 20 g /ft3 [12]. New ways of promoting Pd were also
`developed, mostly involving rare earth oxides such
`as lanthana and ceria [13 -15]. To a large extent, the
`use of Pd has benefited from the significant advances
`made in "oxygen storage" materials during the 1990s,
`as discussed below. However, it should also be noted
`that, in contrast to Pt (and Rh at levels normally em-
`ployed), Pd itself contributes to oxygen storage by its
`ability to undergo a redox cycle under exhaust condi-
`tions. Our own work [ 16] has shown that this source of
`oxygen storage persists even under severe aging con-
`ditions in which the oxygen storage due to rare earth
`oxides is largely lost. This is shown in Fig. 1, in which
`the solid curve represents oxygen storage on Pd cat-
`alysts which contain no other oxygen storage agents.
`After 120 h of dynamometer aging, the Pd catalysts
`which contain rare earth oxides show no more oxy-
`gen storage than their ceria -free counterparts. Finally,
`
`BASF-2011.003
`
`

`
`38
`
`M. Shelef R.W. McCabe /Catalysis Today 62 (2000) 35 -50
`
`10
`
`30
`20
`50
`60
`40
`Bulk oxygen capacity (as PdO)
`
`70
`
`80
`
`Fig. 1. 0-atoms consumed (limo! O- atoms /g cat) in a pulse of CO flowed over a variety of TWCs containing different amounts of Pd.
`Filled squares: catalysts that contain no oxygen storage agents; triangles: dynamometer -aged catalyst containing oxygen storage agents
`(adapted from Ref. f16]).
`
`given the high sensitivity of Pd to poisoning by sul-
`fur [ 17 -18], reduction of fuel sulfur to levels below
`50 ppm in California reformulated fuels was another
`important factor in opening the door to widespread
`use of Pd -only catalysts.
`Currently, TWC formulations containing Pt/Rh,
`Pt /Pd /Rh (trimetal), Pd -only, and Pd /Rh noble metal
`combinations are all in commercial use. It is not
`uncommon to find two formulations in use on the
`same vehicle (e.g. Pd -only as a light -off catalyst and
`Pd /Rh as downstream underbody catalyst). Issues of
`fuel quality (residual Pb levels, sulfur concentration)
`still play an important role in the choice of catalyst
`formulation for a particular market. As all of the
`formulations have improved over time, however, de-
`cisions regarding the choice of the noble metal and
`loading are becoming more and more based on cost
`factors. Indeed, with fluctuations in noble metal prices
`likely to persist into the future, one strategy for vehi-
`cles producers may be to have a number of available
`formulations "on the shelf" that can be deployed in
`response to changing market conditions.
`
`4. Chemistry and electronics
`
`That the catalyst performance is only as good as the
`"quality" of the exhaust gas mixture supplied to it is a
`truism of which all automotive catalyst researchers are
`
`keenly aware. The earliest catalytic converters were
`designed solely for the oxidation of CO and HC and
`were generally used in conjunction with an air pump
`that ensured that, no matter how the engine was run-
`ning, enough air was added to maintain excess oxygen
`required for efficient conversion. By the early 1980s,
`however, emission standards for NO
`in US had been
`tightened to the point where, for most vehicles, efforts
`to reduce NO emissions by lowering compression
`ratios or by exhaust gas recirculation were not suffi-
`cient and an NO catalyst was needed in addition for
`the CO and HC removal. Thus the era of TWC was
`ushered in. With TWC came a coupling of electron-
`ics and chemistry that, unlike many unions, has only
`strengthened with time.
`As noted, CO and HC are converted under oxidizing
`conditions (i.e. with excess air) while NO
`is reduced
`to N2, requiring excess fuel. This is readily seen in
`a standard plot of conversion efficiency for the three
`species as a function of the mass air -fuel ratio (or al-
`ternatively, the X value, which is the actual air -fuel
`ratio divided by the stoichiometric air -fuel ratio) as
`shown in Fig. 2a. Originally, these opposing condi-
`tions were met by dual -bed converters. Here the ve-
`hicle was operated to the rich side of the stoichio-
`metric point and the front catalyst converted primarily
`NO. Air was then injected behind the front converter
`and the exhaust was led over a second catalyst to re-
`move CO and HC. Dual -bed systems were far from
`
`BASF-2011.004
`
`

`
`M Shelef, R.W. McCabe /Catalysis Today 62 (2000) 35 -50
`
`39
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`NOx
`
`H
`
`c
`
`co
`
`.
`
`NQx
`
`'
`
`0
`13.5
`
`(a)
`
`14
`
`14.5
`AIR -FUEL RATIO
`
`15
`
`15.5
`
`.8
`
`.6
`
`.4
`
`.2
`
`o
`13.5
`
`(b)
`
`14
`
`14.5
`AIR -FUEL RATIO
`
`15
`
`15.5
`
`Fig. 2. (a) Typical TWC catalyst efficiency plot vs. air -fuel ratio.
`(b) The corresponding output voltage from the zirconia -based EGO
`sensor.
`
`an optimal solution because a rich engine calibration
`adversely affected fuel economy and constrained the
`operating range of the engine. Moreover, under rich
`conditions, the reducing catalyst promoted significant
`conversion of NO, to ammonia (NH3) rather than the
`desired product, N2. This in turn resulted in reconver-
`sion of ammonia to NO over the oxidizing catalyst
`limiting the effectiveness of the combined system [2].
`It was recognized early that if the air -fuel ratio
`could be controlled sufficiently close to the stoichio-
`metric value, all three pollutants could be converted
`(essentially equilibrated to CO2, H2O and N2) with
`
`high efficiency over a single catalyst [19]. Concurrent
`rapid developments in electronic processors and in
`gas sensors ushered in the era of closed -loop engine
`control. The basic scheme is to utilize an exhaust
`gas oxygen (EGO) sensor which senses at any given
`time whether the exhaust gas mixture is net- oxidizing
`(lean) or net reducing (rich) and sends a signal back
`to the electronic engine control module. This module,
`in turn, signals the fuel injectors to increase or de-
`crease the fueling rate as needed to drive the exhaust
`gas mixture back toward the stoichiometric point.
`Fig. 2b shows the typical switching characteristic of
`a zirconia -based exhaust gas sensor as a function of
`air -fuel ratio.
`Throughout the 1980s and continuing today, huge
`advances have been made in emission control through
`the coupling of electronics and catalytic chemistry.
`Both hardware and software (i.e. calibration strat-
`egy) advances have narrowed the range of air -fuel
`ratio oscillations. At the same time, catalyst for-
`mulations have improved, through the addition of
`so- called "oxygen storage" components mentioned
`above, countervailing the residual excursions from
`the stoichiometric point. Fig. 3 shows typical air -fuel
`traces for a 1986 vehicle compared to a 1990 vehicle,
`with the typical range of air -fuel excursions in each
`case, mapped onto a plot of catalyst conversion effi-
`ciency vs. Air -fuel ratio. One notes the "tightening
`of the air -fuel control which occurred over the four
`year period when carburetors and central fuel injector
`systems were replaced by multi -point fuel injectors,
`in some cases operated sequentially to coordinate fuel
`injection with the opening of cylinder intake valves.
`The aim is to supply just the right mix of air and
`fuel to each cylinder at just the right time to ensure
`stoichiometric combustion in each cylinder. These
`advances in fuel injection and air metering hardware
`have been matched by advances in control strategy,
`specifically improvements to the control algorithms
`introducing aspects of anticipatory control. By know-
`ing the characteristic response times of fuel injectors
`and air flow rates, as induced for example by a sudden
`acceleration, it is now possible to compensate for these
`factors and maintain nearly stoichiometric exhaust
`gas mixtures even during highly transient driving
`modes.
`Recent advances include control systems which
`add a second EGO sensor (or a heated EGO sensor)
`
`BASF-2011.005
`
`

`
`10
`
`M Shelef, R.W. McCabe /Catalysis Today 62 (2000) 35 -50
`
`AF
`
`14
`
`12
`
`16
`
`12
`
`NF
`
`14
`
`16
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`- HC,
`
`40
`
`20
`
`15
`14
`Air /Fuel Ratio
`
`Fig. 3. Typical TWC conversion efficiency plot for HC, CO, and
`as a function of air -fuel ratio. Also shown are representative
`NO
`air -fuel ratio vs. time traces for 1986 and 1990 vehicles with the
`control bandwidth mapped onto the catalyst efficiency plot.
`
`behind the catalyst in addition to the main controlling
`sensor upstream of the catalyst [20]. The downstream
`sensor is less prone to thermal aging or contamina-
`tion, and also senses a more fully equilibrated exhaust
`
`the upstream sensor. Hence, it
`gas mixture than
`switches at a gas composition more representative of
`the true stoichiometric mixture and is used to correct
`the switch point of the main controlling sensor, par-
`ticularly as that sensor ages. A rough block diagram
`for such a fore -aft oxygen sensor system is shown in
`Fig. 4.
`A similar front and rear oxygen sensor config-
`uration is also used to satisfy one of the on -board
`diagnostic requirements (OBD) specified by US EPA
`
`- that of catalyst efficiency monitoring. The strategy
`
`relies on the fact that a highly efficient catalyst has a
`large damping effect on the switching characteristics
`of a downstream sensor, whereas a deactivated cata-
`lyst causes relatively little damping. It is thus possible
`to compare the responses of upstream and down-
`stream sensors and infer the activity of the catalyst.
`Such a system can be used to activate a dashboard
`light which notifies the driver of potential problems
`with the catalyst.
`The coupling of electronics with chemistry for
`optimum emissions control is one research direction
`which will remain a fertile ground far into the future.
`As on -board computational capabilities continue to
`increase, more sophisticated control strategies will
`be implemented. As noted below, the cold -start pe-
`riod and periods of highly transient driving will be
`the focus of further work. In addition, greater capa-
`bility will be developed to incorporate learning and
`self -diagnostic features into the control strategy which
`will allow the system to compensate for mileage in-
`duced changes in catalyst activity and in the sensor
`response characteristics.
`
`Tailpipe
`Emissions
`
`Hego
`Sensor
`
`Engine
`
`Catalyst
`
`Hego
`Sensor
`
`Post -Cat
`Hego Sensor
`Feedback
`Controller
`
`Base Fuel
`Controller
`
`A/F
`Feedback
`Controller
`
`4141+
`EEC -IV
`A/F Bias
`Table
`
`Fig. 4. Block diagram of a modern engine control system employing both pre- and post- catalyst heated EGO (HEGO) sensors.
`
`BASF-2011.006
`
`

`
`M Shelef R.W. McCabe /Catalysis Todar 62 (2000) 35 -50
`
`41
`
`5. Advances in "oxygen storage"
`
`The concept of storing oxygen
`to buffer the
`lean -rich swings in exhaust gas composition during
`vehicle operation has been actively pursued since the
`earliest days of "three -way" automotive catalyst re-
`search, pre -dating the first commercial application of
`TWCs in the early 1980s [21,22]. Early on, ceria was
`recognized as a promising storage material because
`of its combination of facile redox cycling between
`the trivalent and tetravalent oxidation states of the
`Ce ions, good thermal stability, ease of impregnation
`onto alumina, and compatibility with noble metals.
`For many years, ceria has been the chief oxygen stor-
`age component for three -way catalysts and the mech-
`anisms by which it works have been the subject of
`many studies and excellent review papers, including
`a recent detailed survey by Trovarelli [23]. Given the
`large body of information that exists, we confine our
`discussion to a brief summary of the most important
`commercial advances in oxygen storage technology
`over the years as reflected in three main eras, each
`associated with a distinct technological advance and
`a step -function improvement in TWC performance.
`The first era of ceria -containing TWCs spanned
`roughly the years 1981 -1985. At that time the TWC
`formulation was relatively simple. The catalysts con-
`tained noble metals impregnated onto either alumina
`pellets or an alumina washcoat on a monolithic sub-
`strate. Ceria was co- impregnated onto the alumina (at
`a few wt. %) along with the noble metals. Even this
`rudimentary addition of ceria dramatically improved
`TWC performance. Laboratory data of Kim [24], for
`example, comparing Pt-Pd-Rh/A1203 catalysts with
`and without 3 wt.% ceria after 24 h exposure to air
`at 932 °C gave a 15 -20% increase in the CO -NO
`cross -over efficiency' with the addition of ceria. Kim's
`data also showed little benefit of ceria in promoting
`HC conversion, except under rich conditions in which
`steam reforming is promoted by the ceria.
`The second period of ceria deployment was that of
`the so- called "high- tech" three -way catalysts, roughly
`between 1986 and 1992. Although "high- tech" was
`a designation that was inclusive of a number of ad-
`vances in the TWC, the main one was the use of more
`ceria. The effectiveness of ceria as an oxygen stor-
`age component lies in its ability to store and supply
`oxygen to the noble metals on which the oxidation
`
`of CO proceeds. For pure ceria and ceria supported
`on alumina, this transfer is primarily via oxygen from
`the surface or near- surface region of the ceria. Thus,
`much of the emphasis in the design of the "high- tech"
`TWCs was on increasing the surface area of ceria in
`contact with the noble metals. Although surface im-
`pregnation onto alumina was still the main mode of
`deploying the ceria, loadings of ceria in some cata-
`lysts were increased to levels approaching 50% that
`of alumina by using physical mixtures of alumina and
`ceria particles. Again, the improvements in emission
`control were dramatic. Data of Williamson et al. [25],
`reproduced in Fig. 5, are representative of the levels of
`NO conversion that could be achieved by increasing
`the ceria content by a factor of 3 over base levels.
`The success of the high -tech formulations could be
`weighed against an unintended consequence they pro-
`duced for automobile manufacturers: the rotten egg
`odor associated with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) forma-
`tion. Here the problem was one of sulfate storage on
`ceria under lean operating conditions and subsequent
`reduction to H2S under rich conditions. In US, the
`answer to the H2S odor problem has been to incor-
`porate nickel into the three -way catalyst formulation.
`The nickel acts as a scavenger for the sulfur (believed
`to be stored as NiS under rich conditions), and then
`releases it as SO2 under lean conditions [26]. In Eu-
`rope, concerns over the potential formation of poi-
`sonous nickel carbonyl, although never substantiated
`in practice, have led either to the use of other H2S
`scavengers or to thermal pretreatment of the catalyst
`to reduce the ceria surface area.
`The formation of H2S was a problem of a "fresh"
`catalyst. The H2S odor would go away with use as the
`ceria lost surface area through thermal sintering. The
`tendency toward thermal sintering, however, revealed
`a fundamental limitation of the "high- tech" catalyst
`formulations; they deactivated rapidly when exposed
`to exhaust gas temperatures in excess of about 800 °C.
`The primary deactivation mechanism involved sinter-
`ing of both the noble metals and the ceria, with con-
`comitant loss of contact area between the two [27].
`Fig. 6, for example, shows the growth of large ceria
`particles (as tracked by X -ray diffraction) for high -tech
`Pd/Rh and Pt/Rh catalyst formulations as a function
`of accumulated aging time in the lab (Fig. 6a) or
`on a vehicle (Fig. 6b). Transmission electron micro-
`scope characterization of noble metal particle sizes
`
`BASF-2011.007
`
`

`
`42
`
`M Shelef, R.W. McCabe /Catalysis Todaa, 62 (2000) 35 -50
`
`4
`
`A
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70-1
`
`60
`
`50
`420
`
`3XCé
`
`2X Ce
`
`1X Ce
`
`0.7X Ce
`
`460
`500
`540
`EVALUATION TEMPERATURE (°C)
`
`580
`
`Fig. 5. NOx conversion efficiency as a function of evaluation temperature for Pt/Rh TWCs differing in their amount of ceria relative to a
`base level (IX Ce) (adapted from Ref. [25]).
`
`also revealed extensive sintering of the noble metal
`particles, and the temperature -programmed reduction
`(TPR) trace showed loss of features associated with
`"interactions" between the noble metal and ceria.
`The thermal deactivation problems of the TWCs
`having high ceria loadings, together with a new push
`at the beginning of the 1990s for lower emissions,
`and an increase in US durability requirements from
`50 000 to 100 000 miles, all called for new "oxygen
`storage" technology. The lower emissions standards
`brought about by new Federal, California, and Euro-
`pean legislation in the early 1990s also amplified the
`importance of mounting the catalyst close to the en-
`gine to improve cold start emissions. This exacerbated
`the durability problems with the high ceria formula-
`tions as they were now required to operate in a hotter
`environment close to the exhaust manifold.
`The solution to this problem was achieved by ceria
`stabilization. The ceria is stabilized by another metal
`oxide forming a solid solution with it. This is done
`through the use of pre -formed powders and, in some
`cases, by co- impregnation of the oxide precursors onto
`alumina. Like many advances in automotive catalysis,
`the exact source of this invention is difficult to iden-
`tify. The first published paper showing improvements
`in engine dynamometer catalyst performance linked
`with direct evidence for improved oxygen adsorption
`characteristics and smaller CeO2 crystallite sizes is
`
`Reactor Ageing (hours)
`
`cç
`
`20
`
`60
`40
`Miles (1000)
`
`80
`
`100
`
`Fig. 6. CeO2 particle size analysis (by X -ray diffraction) of (a)
`reactor aged and (b) vehicle aged high -tech Pd /Rh and Pt/Rh
`TWCs (adapted from Ref. [27]).
`
`BASF-2011.008
`
`

`
`ts
`
`M Shelef, R.W. McCabe /Catalysis Today 62 (2000) 35 -50
`
`43
`
`probably that of Funabiki and Yamada [28]. The in-
`corporation of stabilized cerias into automotive cata-
`lysts was a major advance in the ability of TWCs to
`perform at high efficiency even after severe thermal
`aging. Bartley et al. [29], for example, tested cata-
`lyst formulations containing stabilized ceria vs. a high
`standard ceria TWC after aging for 45 h at 1050 °C. In
`federal test procedure (FTP) tests, catalysts contain-
`ing stabilized ceria decreased the amount of uncon-
`to 15% of the engine -out level (compared
`verted NO
`to 22% of the engine -out level for the standard cata-
`lyst). The corresponding reductions for CO were 12
`and 20 %, respectively. Consistent with this, they also
`reported smaller ceria particle sizes in the case of the
`stabilized ceria (12.5 nm) compared to the standard
`catalyst (20 nm).
`Although stabilization of ceria particle size (i.e.
`dispersion) by the addition of secondary oxides is
`important, it is not the only effect associated with the
`formation of solid- solution oxygen storage agents.
`Recent work in our laboratory, in collaboration with
`Rhodia, has shown that solid solutions of ceria and
`zirconia provide greatly enhanced participation by
`oxygen from the bulk of the ceria -zirconia particles
`compared to pure ceria [30,31]. For a model Pd cat-
`alyst supported on 70 wt. %- ceria -30 wt. %- zirconia,
`
`a TPR scan after 1050 °C (and even 1150 °C) aging
`(Fig. 7) shows the presence of a new peak between
`100 and 200 °C, not seen in the corresponding TPR
`of Pd on pure ceria. The new peak is due to oxygen
`supplied from the bulk of the ceria -zirconia particles.
`This relaxes the constraint of maintaining high sur-
`face area. Current research on further improving the
`thermal stability of "oxygen storage" components is
`directed at optimizing such factors as synthesis proce-
`dures, the composition of the mixed oxide materials
`and the role of additional surface and bulk promot-
`ers. Ultimately, the goal is to develop oxygèn storage
`materials which are so stable that they can be used
`in any exhaust system location without deactivation
`over the life of the vehicle and without any need to
`"lim

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket