throbber
Catalysts for Nitrogen Oxides
`Control under Lean Burn Conditions
`THE OPPORTUNITY FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY TO
`COMPLEMENT PLATINUM GROUP METAL AUTOCATALY STS
`By T. J. Truex
`Johnson Matthey Technology Centre
`R. A. Searles
`Johnson Matthey Catalytic Systems Division, Royston
`and D. C. Sun
`Johnson Matthey Catalytic Systems Division, Wayne
`
`Regulations to control the exhaust emissions from motor vehicles are be-
`ing adopted by more and more countries around the world, and in future
`more stringent regulations will be introduced, particularly in the U.S.A.
`and Europe. This, together with the need to show good pollution control
`under real-world driving conditions, has led to the widespread introduc-
`tion of closed-loop, three-way catalysts based on the use of platinum
`group metal technology. “he increasing concern about emissions of car-
`bon dioxide, as well as the three traditional pollutants, offers an oppor-
`tunity for catalyst technology to control nitrogen oxides from both fuel
`eficient lean burn petrol engines and from diesel engines, thus com-
`plementing the use of platinum group metals catalysts to control nitrogen
`oxides and other emissions. This paper reviews the development of “lean-
`NOx” technology based on the use of zeolite supported catalysts; it
`highlights the promise shown and the shortcomings still to be overcome.
`
`Over the last 25 years the motor vehicle has
`increasingly become a cause for concern on en-
`vironmental issues. This initially led to the con-
`trol of carbon monoxide, because of
`the
`potential build-up of this toxic gas in congested
`city centres, and of hydrocarbons and nitrogen
`oxides, both precursors of the photochemical
`smog and low level ozone prevalent in some
`regions, particularly in the Los Angeles basin.
`Now the motor vehicle is identified as the
`contributor of around 15 per cent of carbon
`dioxide emissions. Carbon dioxide is the main
`“greenhouse” gas contributing to perhaps 50
`per cent of the predicted global warming and is
`of course the inevitable product of burning
`carbon-containing fossil fuels.
`
`The twin goals of low and efficient fuel use
`and minimum emissions are increasingly being
`addressed by research in both the motor and
`the catalyst industries of the world.
`The Lean Burn Engine
`In various prototype forms the lean burn
`engine has been around for nearly 25 years.
`However, successful and widespread usage of
`this engine has been restricted by increasingly
`strict control on the level of pollutants emitted
`under the full range of engine operating condi-
`tions (1). Recent developments have included
`the evolution of lean operating two-stroke
`engines (Figure 1).
`Lean burn operation involves the burning of
`
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1992, 36, (l), 2-11
`
`2
`
`BASF-2005.001
`
`

`
`Fig. 1 Among lean burn engines
`under development that would
`benefit from using lean-nitrogen
`oxides catalysts is
`the Orbital
`2-stroke engine, shown here
`
`fuel with an excess of air, in ratios up to 24
`parts of air to one part of fuel. Under these con-
`ditions nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide
`emissions are at a minimum, but hydrocarbons
`can rise at the onset of unstable combustion, as
`can be seen in Figure 2. Engine design to in-
`crease the swirl of the aidfuel charge can in-
`crease the air:fuel ratio at which misfire starts
`
`and minimise, but not prevent, hydrocarbon
`emissions.
`The main reason that lean burn engines have
`not so far had widespread acceptance has been
`that the power output from an engine falls as
`the fuelling moves to leaner operation. This
`means that to meet driver expectations of per-
`formance and drivability a rich fuel setting is
`
`LEAN
`
`1
`
`ENGINE
`
`1
`
`I
`
`Hydrocarbons
`
`\ \
`
`10.1
`
`1i:l
`
`
`.
`.
`14:l (4.7.1
`
`16:l
`
`20 :l
`
`22:l
`
`24:l
`
`ie:i
`A I R : FUEL RATIO, by weight
`Fig. 2 These four curves indicate trends which apply to all petrol engines. Under lean burn
`operation fuel is burnt with an excess of air at ratios of up to 24 parts of air to 1 part of
`fuel, and it can be seen that nitrogen oxides and carbon oxides emissions are at a minimum,
`but that hydrocarbon emissions can rise at the start of unstable combustion. When there
`is excess fuel, the engine power is high but high levels of hydrocarbons and carbon monox-
`ide are emitted. Peak combustion temperatures occur just on the lean side of the
`stoichiometric composition and result in the highest emissions of nitrogen oxides
`
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1992, 36, (1)
`
`3
`
`BASF-2005.002
`
`

`
`Table I
`European Regulations
`
`I
`I Pollutants
`Carbon monoxide
`Hydrocarbons + nitrogen oxides
`Particulates/diesel
`
`I
`I
`
`1992 Standards in gramslkm
`
`I
`
`Type approval
`
`2 . 7 2
`0 . 9 7
`0.14
`
`I
`
`Production
`
`3.16
`1.13
`0 . 1 8
`
`On 1/7/92 applies to new models; on 31/12/92 applies to all new registrations
`
`provided for acceleration, high speed cruising
`and hill climbing, thus causing nitrogen oxides
`emissions to increase.
`The Diesel Engine
`The only true lean burn engine in widespread
`use is the diesel engine. The diesel engine stays
`in the lean operating region under all engine
`conditions. The petrol engine is throttled on
`the air intake, and ultimate power from a given
`engine is limited by the amount of air that the
`engine can “breathe”. Conversely the diesel
`engine is unthrottled and its power output is
`determined by the amount of fuel that is in-
`jected into the combustion chamber. The max-
`imum fuel input level is controlled by the onset
`of unacceptable levels of smoke or particulate
`formation. To limit particulate emissions to ac-
`ceptable or legislated levels it is necessary for
`the diesel engine always to operate in the lean
`region (2). This means that the diesel engine
`has a significantly lower power output than a
`petrol engine of the same capacity.
`Three-Way Catalyst Operation
`Conventional three-way catalysts, based on
`the use of combinations of platinum group
`metals - platinum, palladium and rhodium - can
`convert over 90 per cent of the three main
`pollutants carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and
`nitrogen oxides (3). They do this by the exhaust
`gas being controlled by an airfuel ratio (or
`lambda)
`sensor
`around
`the
`so-called
`
`stoichiometric point at which neither air nor
`fuel is in excess at the intake to the engine; for
`a typical petrol composition this is at a ratio of
`14.7 parts of air to 1 part of petrol.
`Under lean conditions the three-way catalyst
`will act as an oxidation catalyst controlling car-
`bon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions, but
`the conversion of the nitrogen oxides emissions
`falls to very low levels.
`Limitations to Lean Operation
`as Legislation Tightens
`The introduction of lean bum engines is
`limited by a number of key factors. The Euro-
`pean driving cycle, during which the emissions
`from motor cars are measured against the
`legislated
`levels, has been changed. The
`original City Test Cycle was based on inner city
`driving in congested traffic with a top speed of
`50 k.p.h. (31 m.p.h.) and an average speed of
`18.8 k.p.h. (11.7 m.p.h.). Under these condi-
`tions a typical car might need to use only 15 per
`cent of its maximum available power, so that
`lean operation would be possible throughout
`the cycle. However, the realisation that a major
`contribution to regional and global pollution is
`made by motor vehicles operating at high
`speeds on highways led to the addition of the
`Extra Urban Driving Cycle (EUDC), which in-
`cludes speeds up to 120 k.p.h. (75 m.p.h.) and
`needs more power than the City Test Cycle.
`This causes greater nitrogen oxides emissions.
`The new European Community directive,
`
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1992, 36, (1)
`
`4
`
`BASF-2005.003
`
`

`
`4
`
`Fig. 3 The U.S. Federal Stan-
`dards include a timetable for
`the progressive reduction of
`2
`E 3
`pollutant emissions in exhaust
`E
`gas:
`hydrocarbon reduction 9
`c
`5
`from 0.41 glmile in 1991, to
`0.125 glmile in 2004
`VI
`L"
`carbon monoxide 5 1
`reduction from 3.4 glmile in
`1991 to 1.7 glmile in 2004
`nitrogen oxides reduc-
`tion from 1 .O glmile in 199 1
`to 0.2 glmile in 2004
`
`1991
`
`1994 to 1996
`(40%)
`llW%)
`YEARS
`
`2004
`
`published on 30th August 1991 (4), sets max-
`imum pollution levels for all sizes of motor cars
`(Table I) and is based on the combined City and
`EUDC cycles. The standards will necessitate
`the use of closed loop, three-way catalysts on all
`new models sold from 1st July 1992 and on all
`new cars registered for sale after 31st December
`1992.
`In the U.S. new, more demanding Federal
`and Californian standards have been set. The
`former will reduce the allowed hydrocarbon
`
`emissions by 40 per cent and nitrogen oxides
`emissions by 60 per cent, by 1996 (Figure 3).
`Californian standards call for increasingly lower
`and lower emissions, culminating in a require-
`ment for all motor vehicle manufacturers to in-
`clude 10 per cent of zero emissions vehicles in
`their fleets by 2003 (Figure 4 and Table 11).
`The Californian standards are also expected to
`be adopted by 13 states in north eastern
`U.S.A., which together account for nearly 40
`per cent of U.S. car sales.
`
`100
`
`8 0
`
`1 c 8 60
`
`L P)
`
`c'
`
`4 0
`1 LL
`
`20
`
`1994
`
`1995
`
`1996
`
`1997
`
`1999
`1998
`YEARS
`
`2 0 0 0
`
`2001
`
`2002
`
`2003
`
`Fig. 4 Californian standards give a timetable for lower emissions and call for motor vehicle
`manufacturers to include 10 per cent of zero emission vehicles in their fleets by 2003
`transitional low emission vehicles
`zero emission vehieles
`1993 standards
`ultra low emission vehicles
`
`a low emission vehicles 0 1991 standards
`
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1992, 36, (1)
`
`5
`
`BASF-2005.004
`
`

`
`Table II
`Californian Standards
`
`Emission limits, gramshile
`
`Hydrocarbons
`
`Carbon monoxide
`
`Nitrogen oxides
`
`0.39
`0.25
`0.125
`0.075
`0.04
`0
`
`7.0
`3.4
`3.4
`3.4
`1.7
`0
`
`0.4
`0.4
`0.4
`0.2
`0.2
`0
`
`I
`
`Year and standard
`
`1991
`1993
`1994 (TLEV)
`1997 (LEV)
`1997 (ULEV)
`1998 (ZEV)
`
`The European Commission will propose
`tougher standards for the European Communi-
`ty by the end of 1992, for agreement during
`1993 and with implementation expected in
`1996. It is anticipated that these will be similar
`to the new U.S. Federal standards.
`These increasing restrictions on nitrogen ox-
`ides emissions and the inclusion of real-world
`driving conditions mitigates against the use of
`lean burn engines, unless the emissions of
`nitrogen oxides can be limited in the engine or
`controlled externally.
`Removal of Nitric Oxide under
`Lean Operation
`Nitric oxide is thermodynamically unstable
`relative to nitrogen and oxygen under the full
`range of exhaust gas stoichiometries and
`temperatures encountered in internal combus-
`tion engines (5). A number of catalysts were
`studied during the 1970s, including platinum
`group metals and metal oxides (6) and some
`were found to decompose nitric oxide, but none
`of these had sufficiently high activity to be of
`practical importance. In their reduced states,
`these catalysts are rapidly oxidised by nitric ox-
`ide, with release of nitrogen. Oxygen is retained
`on the catalyst surface, however, inhibiting fur-
`ther nitric oxide adsorption and decomposition.
`Reducing agents are required to remove this
`surface oxygen and regenerate catalyst activity.
`Selective catalytic reduction using ammonia as
`
`the reducing agent has been utilised for the
`removal of nitric oxide from industrial boilers
`and gas turbines under conditions of excess ox-
`ygen (7). Careful stoichiometric control of the
`ammonia must be maintained to assure efficient
`nitric oxide removal without emission of
`surplus ammonia. For transportation applica-
`tions this process is not practical because of the
`problems associated with the storage of am-
`monia, and controlling ammonia injection
`under transient conditions. An active and
`durable nitric oxide decomposition catalyst, or
`a selective reduction catalyst utilising reducing
`species present in the engine exhaust stream
`would be a major breakthrough for the control
`of nitric oxide in transportation applications.
`Recent literature reports and work conducted
`by Johnson Matthey now indicate that progress
`is being made towards developing these catalyst
`technologies employing platinum group metals.
`
`New Nitric Oxide Decomposition
`Catalysts
`Copper-exchanged zeolites have high activity
`for the catalytic decomposition of nitric oxides
`according to Iwamoto and co-workers (8). A
`number of zeolite systems were investigated in-
`cluding Mordenite, Ferrierite, L-type and
`ZSM-5, with the Cu-ZSM-5 system showing
`the highest activities (9, 10). Using gas mix-
`tures of 0.5-2.1 per cent nitric oxide in helium,
`with gas hourly space velocities of 10-80,000
`
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1992, 36, (1)
`
`6
`
`BASF-2005.005
`
`

`
`per hour, nitric oxide conversions of 13 to 60
`per cent were reported. Maximum conversions
`to nitrogen were observed at about 5OO0C,
`with the degree of decomposition decreasing at
`higher temperatures. This is apparently due to
`a change in mechanism, as opposed to catalyst
`degradation, as the same conversions were
`observed with decreasing catalyst temperature
`after high temperature operation. Water and
`carbon monoxide additions to the gas mixture
`did not greatly influence activity. The addition
`of oxygen resulted in a decrease in nitric oxide
`decomposition activity, although it is claimed
`that this effect is dependent upon the level of
`copper exchange in the zeolite, with high levels
`of exchange resulting in less oxygen inhibition.
`The addition of sulphur dioxide was found to
`poison catalyst activity completely in the 400 to
`6OOOC temperature range, with restoration of
`activity being achieved after
`the high
`temperature desorption of sulphur.
`Detailed kinetic studies of nitric oxide
`decomposition over the Cu-ZSM-5 system have
`been reported by Li and Hall (11, 12). Their
`work has shown that the reaction is first order
`in nitric oxide pressure and inhibited by ox-
`ygen. The kinetics can be described in the
`Langmuir-Hinshelwood form with the inhibi-
`tion being half-order in oxygen pressure. As
`with Iwamoto and co-workers, they observed
`that the nitrogen formed was significantly less
`than the equivalent nitric oxide which disap-
`peared. This discrepancy was accounted for by
`nitrogen dioxide which appears in the products
`as a result of homogeneous reaction of product
`oxygen with undecomposed nitric oxide
`downstream of the catalyst. The redox capacity
`of Cu-ZSM-5 was found to be near 0.5 O:Cu,
`that is le-. In particular, it was shown that ox-
`ygen could be desorbed isothermally from the
`catalyst surface upon reducing the oxygen par-
`tial pressure in the gas stream and that Cu' *
`was reduced to Cu+ I during the desorption of
`oxygen. Since it is generally believed that the
`rate of removal of strongly adsorbed product
`oxygen from the surface limits the nitric oxide
`decomposition on most catalysts, the con-
`tinuous desorption of oxygen from the active
`
`sites of the Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst during steady-
`state reaction is felt to be the key to their high
`sustained activity.
`Although the above results represent a
`significant advancement in the development of
`catalysts for nitric oxide decomposition, major
`improvements will be required before such
`systems can be used to control nitric oxide
`emissions from combustion sources. Nitric ox-
`ide concentrations in exhausts of internal com-
`bustion engines are generally <3000 ppm,
`significantly lower than those used in the work
`reported above. Tests in our laboratories at
`these concentrations with 5 per cent oxygen
`present and gas hourly space velocities of
`20,000 per hour show little nitric oxide conver-
`sion. In addition, the almost complete poison-
`ing of activity by sulphur dioxide in the
`reaction gas mixture would preclude use with
`present petroleum-derived fuels.
`Selective Catalytic Reduction of
`Nitric Oxide by Hydrocarbons
`Another significant, and potentially more
`practical, breakthrough has been the reports by
`Iwamoto (10, 13, 14), Hamada (15, 16, 17) and
`Held (1 8) and co-workers demonstrating the
`selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide by
`hydrocarbons in the presence of excess oxygen.
`Hamada and co-workers have studied nitric ox-
`ide reduction over solid acid (19, transition
`metal promoted alumina and silica (17), and H-
`form zeolites (16). Some of their results using
`C,H, as the selective reducing agent are sum-
`marked in Table 111. Alumina, titania and zir-
`conia all showed modest activity for the
`selective reduction of nitric oxide with C, H, .
`The addition of transition metals to alumina
`resulted in substantially higher activity, with
`cobalt and iron presenting the highest conver-
`sions. Interestingly, the observation was made
`that a correlation exists between cobalt
`aluminate formation and nitric oxide reduction
`activity. Of
`the platinum group metals,
`platinum exhibited the highest activity. As the
`results presented in Table 111 show, the H-form
`zeolites were the most active catalysts tested by
`these workers. In all these studies nitric oxide
`
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1992, 36, (1)
`
`7
`
`BASF-2005.006
`
`

`
`Table 111
`Selective Reduction of Nitric Oxide over Solid Acid (15),
`Transition Metal Promoted Alumina (1 7) and Zeolite (16) Catalysts
`
`Nitric oxide conversion to nitrogen, per cent
`
`at 3OOOC
`< 0.4
`0.5
`0.8
`-
`4.2
`14.0
`19.0
`4.5
`13.0
`9.0
`12.0
`13.0
`49.0
`58.0
`9.0
`
`at 4OOOC
`< 0.6
`13.0
`4.8
`23.0
`49.0
`23.0
`35.0
`31 .O
`13.0
`28.0
`5.6
`8.9
`59.0
`65.0
`19.0
`
`at 5OOOC
`< 1 . 1
`32.0
`8.9
`20.0
`29.0
`11.0
`17.0
`40.0
`7.4
`12.0
`5.4
`8.5
`38.0
`48.0
`26.0
`
`Catalyst
`
`(blue)
`(green)
`(orange)
`(green)
`(brown)
`
`3
`
`
`
`SiO,
`4
`0
`TiO,
`TiO,
`ZrO,
`ZrO,
`2% Co/AI,O,
`2% Cu/AI,O,
`2% Fe/AI,O,
`2% Ni/AI,O,
`2% Mn/AI,O,
`0.5% Pt/AI,O,
`0.5% Pd/AI,O,
`0.5% Rh/AI,O,
`H-ZSM-5
`H-Mordenite
`HY
`
`~
`
`1000 ppm NO, 329 ppm C,H.. 10% 0, at 3.7 LlHG MHSV Whg mass hourly space velocity1
`
`conversion to nitrogen was observed to go
`through a maximum with increasing reaction
`temperature. In the region where significant
`nitrogen was formed carbon monoxide, in addi-
`tion to carbon dioxide, was found in the pro-
`duct gas stream. At higher temperatures where
`nitrogen formation decreases, the hydrocarbon
`was completely oxidised to carbon dioxide. It
`was also found that the temperature of max-
`imum nitric oxide reduction to nitrogen was
`dependent upon the hydrocarbon species, with
`maximum
`conversion
`occurring
`at
`a
`temperature about 100°C lower when C,H,
`was used as reductant, instead of C,H,.
`A number of ion-exchanged zeolites have
`been examined for their selective nitric oxide
`reduction activity by hydrocarbons (10, 13, 14).
`Using a gas mixture containing 1000 ppm nitric
`oxide, 250 ppm C,H,, and 2 per cent oxygen
`at a mass hourly space velocity of 18
`litresihour/gram,
`the order of
`activity
`(temperature for maximum nitric oxide reduc-
`tion to nitrogen) was copper (250°C)<cobalt
`
`(350°C)<H (400°C)<silver (450-600°C)<zinc
`(6OOOC). Maximum conversions to nitrogen
`were 30-40 per cent and were relatively in-
`dependent of the cation. Activities of various
`copper ion-exchanged zeolites were (conversion
`to nitrogen at 25OOC): Cu-ZSM-5 (31%)>cu-
`(26%) - Cu-L-type
`Mordenite
`(25%)>cu-
`Ferrierite (23%). The effect of space velocity on
`conversion was studied for Cu-ZSM-5, H-
`ZSM-5, and alumina catalysts. Conversion over
`alumina dropped rapidly at gas hourly space
`velocities greater than about 5000 per hour, H-
`ZSM-5 conversions showed a modest decline in
`the range of 5-20,000 per hour with a rapid fall
`at higher space velocities, and conversion over
`Cu-ZSM-5 was stable up to 48,000 per hour
`with a fall at higher values. These results show
`that transition metal ion-exchanged zeolites can
`have substantially higher activity than the H-
`form systems, with
`the copper-exchanged
`catalysts showing most promise.
`Using laboratory gas mixtures more typical of
`engine exhaust, together with actual engine
`
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1992, 36, (1)
`
`8
`
`BASF-2005.007
`
`

`
`I
`
`I
`
`Table I V
`Selective Nitric Oxide Reduction over Copper-Mordenite and Copper-ZSM-5
`
`Catalyst
`
`Cu-Mordenite
`
`CU-ZSM-5
`
`Nitric oxide conversion to nitrogen, per cent
`
`HC
`(ppm as C , )
`
`C,H, (1001
`C,H, (700)
`C,H, (2500)
`C,H, (5000)
`
`C,H, (700)
`C,H, (2500)
`C,H, (5000)
`C,H, (2500)
`CH, (250)
`
`200OC
`
`3OOOC
`
`4OOOC
`
`5OOOC
`
`6OOOC
`
`0
`3
`4
`3
`
`-
`-
`-
`0
`0
`
`3
`15
`38
`58
`
`12
`16
`12
`0
`0
`
`2
`13
`40
`55
`
`30
`50
`68
`15
`0
`
`2
`12
`33
`45
`
`23
`47
`58
`43
`0
`
`2
`2
`6
`8
`
`12
`20
`40
`37
`7
`
`250 ppm NO. HC ias indicatedl. 5% 0,. 1 3 % CO,, and 10% H,O in N, at 20,000ih gas hourly space velocity
`
`evaluation, Held and co-workers (18) have
`reported results on a number of transition metal
`ion-exchanged zeolites. Cu-Mordenite; Cr-, Fe-,
`Mn-, V-, Cu-, Co-, Ni-, and Ag-Y zeolite; Cu-
`X zeolite; and Ir-, Pt-, Rh-, Ni-, Co-, and Cu-
`ZSM-5 were all reported to have some activity
`for selective reduction of nitric oxide by
`hydrocarbons in the presence of excess oxygen.
`The Cu ion-exchanged systems showed the
`highest activities of those tested. They also
`showed that there was an inhibition of activity
`when water was added to the reaction gas mix-
`ture. Studies of the two most active catalyst
`systems, Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-Mordenite, with a
`gas mixture containing 1000 ppm nitric oxide,
`400 ppm C,H,, and 1.5 per cent oxygen at
`35OOC and a gas hourly space velocity of
`13,000 per hour showed that nitric oxide con-
`versions over Cu-Mordenite dropped from 37
`to 17 per cent with the inclusion of 10 per cent
`water vapour. Under the same conditions, the
`more hydrophobic Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst showed a
`drop in nitric oxide conversion from 50 to 37
`per
`cent. A
`conventional
`autocatalyst
`monolithic substrate was coated with Cu-
`ZSM-5 for engine evaluation. Under steady-
`state conditions at about 4OOOC
`inlet
`temperature and a gas hourly space velocity of
`
`approximately 15,000 per hour, nitrogen oxides
`conversions of 35 to 45 per cent were observed
`at air:fuel ratios of 17.5-19: 1. A correlation
`exists between nitrogen oxides conversion and
`the hydrocarbonxitrogen oxides ratio in the
`exhaust gas mixtllre, with the highest nitrogen
`oxides conversions occurring at the highest
`hydrocarb0n:nitrogen oxides ratios.
`In our laboratories, monolithic substrates
`have been coated with Cu-Mordenite and Cu-
`ZSM-5 catalysts for laboratory flow reactor and
`engine evaluation. Laboratory flow reactor
`results are summarised in Table IV. It should
`be noted that under these conditions no s i d i -
`cant nitric oxide conversion was observed in the
`absence of hydrocarbons, indicating that direct
`decomposition was not contributing to nitric
`oxide conversion. As was found by other
`workers, nitric oxide conversion went through
`a maximum as a function of temperature. Car-
`bon monoxide formation was observed during
`the onset of nitric oxide conversion. Complete
`conversion of hydrocarbon to carbon dioxide
`was observed at higher temperatures associated
`with declining nitric oxide conversion. These
`results show that zeolite type, the hydrocar-
`bon:nitric oxide ratio, and the hydrocarbon
`species all have a significant effect on nitric
`
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1992, 36, (1)
`
`9
`
`BASF-2005.008
`
`

`
`oxide reduction activity. Consistent with other
`reports, the Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst gave higher
`conversions than the Cu-Mordenite catalyst.
`Maximum conversions increased with increas-
`ing hydrocarbon concentrations (increasing
`HC:NO ratio). The use of C,H, instead of
`C,H, as reductant resulted in an increase in
`temperature for maximum nitric oxide conver-
`sion from - 4OOOC to - 5OOOC. The use of CH,
`resulted in minimal nitric oxide reduction at
`temperatures up to 600OC. The dependence on
`hydrocarbon
`species
`and
`concentration,
`together with the observation that carbon
`monoxide formation occurs simultaneously
`with nitric oxide reduction,
`implies that
`hydrocarbon partial oxidation or decomposition
`products
`are
`involved
`in
`the
`reaction
`mechanism. In separate experiments we have
`exposed a Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst first
`to a
`C,H,/O, mixture and subsequently
`to a
`NO/O, mixture. Immediately upon switching
`to the NO/O, mixture, significant nitric oxide
`conversion is observed which decays with time,
`implying that hydrocarbon-containing species
`deposited on the catalyst surface are involved in
`the reaction, and are being depleted with time.
`We have also shown that carbon monoxide and
`hydrogen are much
`less effective
`than
`hydrocarbon for selective nitric oxide reduction
`over these catalyst systems. Iwamoto has
`classified reductants into two groups, selective
`(C,H,, C3H,, C,H,, C,H,) and non-selective
`(H2, COY CH, and C2H,) based upon similar
`observations (10). His group has also in-
`vestigated the role of oxygen, showing that up
`to about 2 per cent oxygen in the reactant
`stream strongly activates nitric oxide reduction
`with a slight inhibition observed at higher con-
`centrations. Our studies have shown similar ef-
`fects with the added observation that exposure
`of a Cu-Mordenite catalyst to nitric oxide and
`C H , in the absence of oxygen resulted in a
`reddish colour change to the catalyst, implying
`the presence of reduced metallic copper. This
`occurs even when the reactant gas mixture is
`net oxidising and may indicate that the impor-
`tance of oxygen is in maintaining copper in an
`active oxidation state.
`
`At present there is very little information
`available on catalyst durability but, as ex-
`pected¶ there are indications that the zeolite
`systems would be limited to temperatures less
`than 600°C to avoid thermal degradation. In-
`itial resistance to sulphur dioxide poisoning has
`been
`indicated (14) although longer term
`poisoning effects remain to be assessed.
`Future Work and Requirements
`for a Practical Emission Catalyst
`A much better understanding of
`the
`mechanism(s) involved in the selective nitric
`oxide reduction reaction with hydrocarbons
`must be obtained as a basis for development of
`improved catalyst systems. These studies,
`together with engine evaluations, must address
`a number of possible limitations of present
`technology for vehicle applications. Some of
`* Thermal stability of the present Cu-zeolite
`these limitations include:
`
`systems
`t Effects of potential poisons, particularly
`sulphur compounds
`
`* The relatively narrow range of temperatures
`* The effects of cyclic engine operation, par-
`
`and low space velocities associated with op-
`timum performance
`
`ticularly the effects of varying emission rates of
`hydrocarbons versus nitrogen oxides on catalyst
`function.
`The importance of these last two effects is
`demonstrated by the work of Held and co-
`workers (18). They tested Cu-ZSM-5 catalysts
`on a vehicle under the transient FTP cycle.
`Nitrogen oxides conversions of about 15 per
`cent were obtained during cold-start (bag 1)
`and about 30 per cent during hot-start (bag 3)
`tests. The lower conversions were ascribed to
`low catalyst temperatures during cold-start and
`the generally higher space velocities incurred in
`the FTP during the hot-start test. It was also
`noted that under acceleration conditions where
`significant nitrogen oxides are formed, the
`nitrogen oxides:hydrocarbon ratio was un-
`favourable for nitrogen oxides reduction. The
`requirement for high hydrocarb0n:nitrogen ox-
`ides ratios was found to be a major problem in
`
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1992, 36, (1)
`
`10
`
`BASF-2005.009
`
`

`
`studies using a diesel engine. Diesel engines
`have inherently low hydrocarbon emissions and
`injection of hydrocarbons into the exhaust
`stream was necessary to obtain significant
`nitrogen oxides conversion.
`Finally, a complete automotive emission con-
`trol catalyst system must have adequate
`hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide activity in
`addition to nitrogen oxides removal. The
`catalyst systems described above show deficien-
`cies in hydrocarbons and, particularly, carbon
`monoxide activity which would require the use
`
`of a dual function catalyst system. The first
`component would be the selective nitrogen ox- 1
`ides reduction catalyst, followed by a conven-
`tional platinum group metal catalyst for
`hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide removal.
`Such concepts are already described in the pa-
`tent literature. It is obvious that a practical
`selective nitrogen oxides reduction catalyst for
`automotive applications is some time away, but
`the exciting results obtained in the past several
`years and the high level of activity in this area
`are reasons for encouragement.
`
`References
`9 M. Iwamoto, H. Yahiro and K. Tanda, “Suc-
`1 R. A. Searles, Platinum Metals Rev., 1988, 32,
`( 3 ~ 123
`cessful Design of Catalysts”, ed. T. h i ,
`Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 219-226
`2 B. J. Cooper and S. A. Roth, Platinum Metals
`10 M. Iwamotoand H. Hamada, Catal. Today, 1991,
`Rev., 1991, 35, (4), 178
`10, 57
`3 B. Harrison, B. J. Cooper and A. J. J. Wilkins,
`11 Y. Li and W. K. Hall, 3. Phys. Chem., 1990,94,
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1981, 25, (l), 14
`6145
`4 Off. 3., 30th August 1991, 34, L242
`12 Y. Li and W. K. Hall,3. Catal., 1991, 129, 202
`5 B. Harrison, M. Wyatt and K. G . &ugh,
`13 S. %to, Y. Yu-u, H. Yahiro, N. W o a n d M.
`“Catalysis”, Vol. 5, R. Sot. Chem., London,
`Iwamoto, ~ p p l . Catal., 1991, 70, ~1
`1982, pp. 127-171
`14 M. Iwamoto, H. Yahiro, S. Shundo, Y. Yu-u and
`6 J. W. Hightower and D. A. VanLeirsburg, in
`Appl. Catal., 1991, 69, L15
`N. &no,
`‘‘The Catalytic Chemistry of Ninogen a i d e s ” ,
`15 Y. Kintaichi, H. Hamada, M. Tabata, M. Sasaki
`ed. R. L. Klimisch and J. G. Larson, 1975,
`and T. Ito, Catal. Lett., 1990, 6, 239
`Plenum Press, New York, p. 63
`16 H. Hamada, Y. Kintaichi, M. Sasaki, T. Ito and
`7 B. Harrison, A. F. Diwell and M. Wyatt,
`M. Tabata, Appl. Catal., 1990, 64, L1
`17 Op. cir. (Ref. 16), 1991, 75, L1
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1985, 29, (2), 5
`18 W. Held, A. Konig, T. Richter and L. Ruppe,
`8 M. Iwamoto, S. Yokoo, K. Sakai and S. Kagawa,
`3. Chem. SOC., Faraday Trans., 1981, 77, 1629
`SAE Paper No. 900496, 1990
`Rhodium-Iron Resistance Thermometer
`Fused-Silica Coil Frame”, Cryogenics, 1991,
`For some twenty years the rhodium-iron
`31, (lo), 869-873). The use of fused silica
`resistance thermometer has been regarded as
`one of the most reliable for low temperature
`enables the sensing element to be annealed at
`temperatures above 600OC. The four lead wires
`measurement, and in various forms has been
`used from millikelvin regions up to room
`and the protective sheath are made of platinum.
`temperature. Although it is known that the an-
`The influence of annealing temperatures bet-
`ween 700 and 900OC upon the resistance of the
`nealing treatment is one of the most important
`factors controlling the thermometric properties
`thermometer has been investigated, and a
`of such thermometers, only limited information
`calibration method proposed for cryogenic use
`is available about their stability when the
`of the thermometers.
`It is concluded that an annealing temperature
`rhodium-iron (mole fraction 0.5 per cent) is in
`the form of wire.
`of 8OOOC is required to remove the strain pro-
`A resent communication from the National
`duced in the wire by coiling; thermometers an-
`Research Laboratory of Metrology, Japan,
`nealed at or above this temperature have similar
`reports on the effects of annealing on a new
`temperature-resistance
`characteristics
`and,
`type of rhodium-iron thermometer, in which
`after calibrating the deviation from a reference
`the 50 pm diameter wire is wound bifilarly
`function at only three calibration points, can be
`around a cross-shaped frame machined from
`used with an accuracy better than 0.5 mK over
`fused silica. (0. Tamura and H. Sakurai,
`the range 4.2 to 25 K. Self-heating effects were
`“Rhodium-Iron Resistance Thermometer with
`found to be of a reasonable magnitude.
`
`Platinum Metals Rev., 1992, 36, (1)
`
`11
`
`BASF-2005.010

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket