throbber
H Y D R A U L I C
`
`History of
`
`A N E N D U R I N G T E C H N O L O G Y
`
`Carl T. Montgomery and Michael B. Smith, NSI Technologies
`
`Editor’s note: In 2006, SPE honored nine pioneers of the hydraulic fracturing industry as Legends of
`Hydraulic Fracturing. Claude E. Cooke Jr., Francis E. Dollarhide, Jacques L. Elbel, C. Robert Fast, Robert
`R. Hannah, Larry J. Harrington, Thomas K. Perkins, Mike Prats, and H.K. van Poollen were recognized as
`instrumental in developing new technologies and contributing to the advancement of the fi eld through their
`roles as researchers, consultants, instructors, and authors of ground-breaking journal articles.
`
`Following is an excerpt from SPE’s new Legends of Hydraulic Fracturing CDROM, which contains an
`extended overview of the history of the technology, list of more than 150 technical papers published by
`these industry legends, personal refl ections from a number of the Legends and their colleagues, and historic
`photographs. For more information on the CDROM, please go to http://store.spe.org/Legendsof-Hydraulic-
`Fracturing-P433.aspx.
`
`
`
`2626
`
`1 of 16
`
`JPT • DECEMBER 2010
`JPT • DECEMBER 2010
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`

`

`S
`
`ince Stanolind Oil
`introduced hydraulic
`fracturing in 1949, close
`to 2.5 million fracture
`treatments have been performed
`worldwide. Some believe that
`approximately 60% of all wells
`drilled today are fractured. Fracture
`stimulation not only increases the
`production rate, but it is credited
`with adding to reserves—9 billion
`bbl of oil and more than 700 Tscf of
`gas added since 1949 to US reserves
`alone—which otherwise would have
`been uneconomical to develop.
`In addition, through accelerating
`production, net present value of
`reserves has increased.
`Fracturing can be traced to
`the 1860s, when liquid (and later,
`solidifi ed) nitroglycerin (NG) was
`used to stimulate shallow, hard
`rock wells in Pennsylvania, New
`York, Kentucky, and West Virginia.
`Although extremely hazardous,
`and often used illegally, NG was
`spectacularly successful for oil well
`“shooting.” The object of shooting a
`well was to break up, or rubblize,
`the oil-bearing formation to increase
`both initial fl ow and ultimate
`recovery of oil. This same fracturing
`principle was soon applied with equal
`effectiveness to water and gas wells.
`In the 1930s, the idea of injecting
`a nonexplosive fl uid (acid) into the
`ground to stimulate a well began
`to be tried. The “pressure parting”
`phenomenon was recognized in
`well-acidizing operations as a means
`
`Fig. 1—In 1947, Stanolind Oil conducted
`the fi rst experimental fracturing in the
`Hugoton fi eld located in southwestern
`Kansas. The treatment utilized napalm
`(gelled gasoline) and sand from the
`Arkansas River.
`
`Fig. 2—On 17 March, 1949, Halliburton conducted the fi rst two commercial fracturing
`treatments in Stephens County, Oklahoma, and Archer County, Texas.
`
`of creating a fracture that would not
`close completely because of acid
`etching. This would leave a fl ow
`channel to the well and enhance
`productivity. The phenomenon
`was confi rmed in the fi eld, not
`only with acid treatments, but also
`during water injection and squeeze-
`cementing operations.
`But it was not until Floyd Farris
`of Stanolind Oil and Gas Corporation
`(Amoco) performed an in-depth
`study to establish a relationship
`between observed well performance
`and treatment pressures that
`“formation breakdown” during
`acidizing, water injection, and
`squeeze cementing became better
`understood. From this work, Farris
`conceived the idea of hydraulically
`fracturing a formation to enhance
`production from oil and gas wells.
`The fi rst experimental treatment
`to “Hydrafrac” a well for stimulation
`was performed in the Hugoton gas
`fi eld in Grant County, Kansas, in
`1947 by Stanolind Oil (Fig. 1). A
`total of 1,000 gal of naphthenic-acid-
`and-palm-oil- (napalm-) thickened
`gasoline was injected, followed by
`a gel breaker, to stimulate a gas-
`producing limestone formation at
`2,400 ft. Deliverability of the well did
`not change appreciably, but it was a
`start. In 1948, the Hydrafrac process
`was introduced more widely to the
`
`industry in a paper written by J.B.
`Clark of Stanolind Oil. A patent was
`issued in 1949, with an exclusive
`license granted to the Halliburton Oil
`Well Cementing Company (Howco)
`to pump the new Hydrafrac process.
`Howco performed the fi rst two
`commercial fracturing treatments—
`one, costing USD 900, in Stephens
`County, Oklahoma, and the other,
`costing USD 1,000, in Archer
`County, Texas—on March 17, 1949,
`using lease crude oil or a blend of
`crude and gasoline, and 100 to 150
`lbm of sand (Fig. 2). In the fi rst
`year, 332 wells were treated, with
`an average production increase of
`75%. Applications of the fracturing
`process grew rapidly and increased
`the supply of oil in the United States
`far beyond anything anticipated.
`Treatments reached more than 3,000
`wells a month for stretches during
`the mid-1950s. The fi rst one-half-
`million-pound fracturing job in the
`free world was performed in October
`1968, by Pan American Petroleum
`Corporation (later Amoco, now BP)
`in Stephens County, Oklahoma. In
`2008, more than 50,000 frac stages
`were completed worldwide at a
`cost of anywhere between USD
`10,000 and USD 6 million. It is now
`common to have from eight to as
`many as 40 frac stages in a single
`well. Some estimate that hydraulic
`
`
`H Y D R A U L I C F R A C T U R I N G T H E F U S S , T H E F A C T S , T H E F U T U R EH Y D R A U L I C F R A C T U R I N G T H E F U S S , T H E F A C T S , T H E F U T U R E
`2 of 16
`
`27
`27
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`

`

`essential parallel development
`meant fewer pounds of gelling
`agent were required to obtain a
`desired viscosity. As more and
`more fracturing treatments have
`involved high-temperature wells,
`gel stabilizers have been developed,
`the fi rst of which was the use
`of approximately 5% methanol.
`Later, chemical stabilizers were
`developed that could be used alone
`or with the methanol.
`Improvements in crosslinkers
`and gelling agents have resulted
`in systems that permit the fl uid
`to reach the bottom of the hole in
`high-temperature wells prior to
`crosslinking, thus minimizing the
`effects of high shear in the tubing.
`Ultraclean gelling agents based on
`surfactant-association chemistry and
`encapsulated breaker systems that
`activate when the fracture closes
`have been developed to minimize
`fracture-conductivity damage.
`
`Proppants
`The fi rst fracturing treatment
`used screened river sand as a
`proppant. Others that followed
`used construction sand sieved
`through a window screen. There
`have been a number of trends
`in sand size, from very large to
`small, but, from the beginning, a
`–20 +40 US-standard-mesh sand
`has been the most popular, and
`currently approximately 85% of the
`sand used is this size. Numerous
`propping agents have been evaluated
`throughout the years, including
`plastic pellets, steel shot, Indian
`glass beads, aluminum pellets, high-
`strength glass beads, rounded nut
`shells, resin-coated sands, sintered
`bauxite, and fused zirconium.
`The concentration of sand
`(lbm/fl uid gal) remained low until the
`mid-1960s, when viscous fl uids such
`as crosslinked water-based gel and
`viscous refi ned oil were introduced.
`Large-size propping agents were
`advocated then.
`The trend then changed from
`the monolayer or partial monolayer
`concept to pumping higher sand
`concentrations. Since that time, the
`
`3 of 16
`
`JPT • DECEMBER 2010
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`Fig. 3—A 1955 frac pump manufacturing facility. These remotely controlled pumps were
`powered by 1,475 hp surplus Allison aircraft engines used during World War II.
`
`fracturing has increased US
`recoverable reserves of oil by at least
`30% and of gas by 90%.
`
`Fluids and Proppants
`Soon after the fi rst few jobs, the
`average fracture treatment consisted
`of approximately 750 gal of fl uid and
`400 lbm of sand. Today treatments
`average approximately 60,000 gal of
`fl uid and 100,000 lbm of propping
`agent, with the largest treatments
`exceeding 1 million gal of fl uid and
`5 million lbm of proppant.
`
`Fluids
`The fi rst fracture treatments were
`performed with a gelled crude. Later,
`gelled kerosene was used. By the
`latter part of 1952, a large portion of
`fracturing treatments were performed
`with refi ned and crude oils. These
`fl uids were inexpensive, permitting
`greater volumes at lower cost. Their
`lower viscosities exhibited less
`friction than the original viscous
`gel. Thus, injection rates could be
`obtained at lower treating pressures.
`To transport the sand, however,
`higher rates were necessary to offset
`the fl uid’s lower viscosity.
`With the advent in 1953 of water
`as a fracturing fl uid, a number of
`gelling agents were developed. The
`
`28
`
`fi rst patent (US Patent 3058909)
`on guar crosslinked by borate was
`issued to Loyd Kern with Arco
`on October 16, 1962. One of the
`legends of hydraulic fracturing, Tom
`Perkins, was granted the fi rst patent
`(US Patent 3163219) on December
`29, 1964 on a borate gel breaker.
`Surfactants were added to minimize
`emulsions with the formation fl uid,
`and potassium chloride was added
`to minimize the effect on clays and
`other water-sensitive formation
`constituents. Later, other clay-
`stabilizing agents were developed
`that enhanced the potassium
`chloride, permitting the use of water
`in a greater number of formations.
`Other innovations, such as foams
`and the addition of alcohol, have also
`enhanced the use of water in more
`formations. Aqueous fl uids such as
`acid, water, and brines are used now
`as the base fl uid in approximately
`96% of all fracturing treatments
`employing a propping agent.
`In the early 1970s, a major
`innovation in fracturing fl uids was
`the use of metal-based crosslinking
`agents to enhance the viscosity
`of gelled water-based fracturing
`fl uids for higher-temperature wells.
`It is interesting to note that the
`chemistry used to develop these
`fl uids was “borrowed” from the
`plastic explosives industry. An
`
`

`

`One Tough
`Proppant
`
`“We knock out lightweights”
`
`New PowerProp® with MultiCoat Technology delivers
`greater strength and better performance than the leading
`lightweight ceramic proppant.
`
`We beat lightweights in every category!
`(cid:116)(cid:1)(cid:41)(cid:80)(cid:85)(cid:1)(cid:88)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:86)(cid:84)(cid:73)
`(cid:116)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:80)(cid:79)(cid:69)(cid:86)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:90)
`(cid:116)(cid:1)(cid:35)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:66)(cid:1)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:71)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:78)(cid:66)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:70)
`
`More strength and flexibility from our patented
`coating technology means reaching and maintaining
`higher peaks before crush.
`
`We’ll prove it at
`PowerProp.com
`1-888-SANTROL
`
`Why would you ever use a lightweight ceramic again?
`
`MultiCoat Proppant
`
`See us at SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Conference–Booth #43
`Ex. 2087
`4 of 16
`IPR2016-01506
`
`

`

`Courtesy Halliburton
`
`Courtesy Schlumberger
`
`Fig. 4—Early screw-type sand blender.
`
`Fig. 5—Modern fl uid/proppant blender or
`proportioning unit.
`
`concentration has increased almost
`continuously, with a sharp increase
`in recent years. These high sand
`concentrations are due largely to
`advances in pumping equipment and
`improved fracturing fl uids. Now it
`is not uncommon to use proppant
`concentrations averaging 5 to 8 lbm/
`gal throughout the treatment, with a
`low concentration at the start of the
`job, increased to 20 lbm/gal toward
`the end of the job.
`
`Pumping and
`Blending Equipment
`Hydraulic horsepower (hhp) per
`treatment has increased from an
`average of approximately 75 hhp
`to more than 1,500 hhp. There
`are cases where, with as much as
`15,000 hhp available, more than
`10,000 hhp was actually used, in
`
`stark contrast with some early
`jobs, where only 10 to 15 hhp was
`employed. Some of the early pump
`manufacturing facilities made
`remotely controlled pumps powered
`by surplus Allison aircraft engines
`used during World War II
`(Figs. 3, 6).
`Initial jobs were performed
`at rates of 2 to 3 bbl/min. This
`increased rapidly until the early
`1960s, when it rose at a slower rate,
`settling in the 20 bbl/min range
`(even though there were times
`when the rate employed in the
`Hugoton fi eld was more than 300
`bbl/min). Then in 1976, Othar Kiel
`started using high-rate “hesitation”
`fractures to cause what he called
`“dendritic” fractures. Today, in the
`unconventional shale-gas plays,
`Kiel’s ideas are used where the
`pump rates are more than 100 bbl/
`
`Fig. 6—Vintage 1950s remotely controlled frac pumper powered by surplus WWII
`Allison aircraft engines.
`
`min. Surface treating pressures
`sometimes are less than 100 psi, yet
`others may approach 20,000 psi.
`Conventional cement- and
`acid-pumping equipment was
`used initially to execute fracturing
`treatments. One to three units
`equipped with one pressure pump
`delivering 75 to 125 hhp were
`adequate for the small volumes
`injected at the low rates. Amazingly,
`many of these treatments gave
`phenomenal production increases.
`As treating volumes increased,
`accompanied by a demand for greater
`injection rates, special pumping and
`blending equipment was developed.
`Development of equipment including
`intensifi ers, slinger, and special
`manifolds continues. Today, most
`treatments require that service
`companies furnish several million
`dollars’ worth of equipment.
`For the first few years, sand
`was added to the fracturing fl uid by
`pouring it into a tank of fracturing
`fl uid over the suction. Later, with
`less-viscous fl uid, a ribbon or paddle
`type of batch blender was used.
`Shortly after this, a continuous
`proportioner blender utilizing
`a screw to lift the sand into the
`blending tub was developed (Fig. 4).
`Blending equipment has become
`very sophisticated to meet the need
`for proportioning a large number
`of dry and liquid additives, then
`uniformly blending them into the
`base fl uid and adding the various
`concentrations of sand or other
`propping agents. Fig. 5 shows one
`of these blending units.
`To handle large propping-agent
`volumes, special storage facilities
`were developed to facilitate their
`delivery at the right rate through the
`fl uid. Treatments in the past were
`conducted remotely but still without
`any shelter. Today, treatments have
`a very sophisticated control center
`to coordinate all the activities that
`occur simultaneously.
`
`Fracture-Treatment Design
`The fi rst treatments were designed
`using complex charts, nomographs,
`
`30
`
`5 of 16
`
`JPT • DECEMBER 2010
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`

`

`PKN
`(Perkins & Kern)
`
`GDK
`(Geertsma & de Klerk)
`
`hf
`
`Xf
`
`wf
`
`Area of largest
`flow resistance
`
`Approximately elliptical
`shape of fracture
`
`Xf
`
`wf
`
`Fig. 7—Early 2D fracture-geometry models.
`
`TVD
`m
`4380
`
`4400
`
`4420
`
`4440
`
`79.65 min
`
`0.000
`
`1.416
`
`2.833
`
`4.249
`
`5.666
`
`7.082
`
`8.499
`
`9.915
`
`
`
`11 33211.332
`
`12.748
`
`14.165
`0.115 m
`
`10000 11000 12000 13000
`Stress (psi)
`
`50
`
`100
`Fracture Penetration (m)
`
`150
`
`Courtesy NSI Technologie
`
`Fig. 8—Modern fully gridded frac model showing fl uid and
`proppant vectors.
`
`and calculations to determine
`appropriate size, which generally
`was close to 800 gal (or multiples
`thereof) of fl uid, with the sand at
`concentrations of 0.5 to 0.75 lbm/
`gal. This largely hit-or-miss method
`was employed until the mid-1960s,
`when programs were developed
`for use on simple computers. The
`original programs were based on
`work developed by Khristianovic
`
`and Zheltov (1955), Perkins and
`Kern (1961), and Geertsma and
`de Klerk (1969) on fl uid effi ciency
`and the shape of a fracture system
`in two dimensions (Fig. 7). These
`programs were a great improvement
`but were limited in their ability to
`predict fracture height.
`As computer capabilities
`have increased, frac-treatment-
`design programs have evolved to
`
`include fully gridded fi nite-element
`programs that predict fracture
`geometry and fl ow properties
`in three dimensions (Fig. 8).
`Today, programs are available to
`obtain a temperature profi le of the
`treating fl uid during a fracturing
`treatment, which can assist in
`designing the concentrations of
`the gel, gel-stabilizer, breaker, and
`propping-agent during treatment
`
`H Y D R A U L I C F R A C T U R I N G T H E F U S S , T H E F A C T S , T H E F U T U R E
`6 of 16
`
`31
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`

`

`stages. Models have been developed
`to simulate the way fl uids move
`through the fracture and the way the
`propping agent is distributed. From
`these models, production increases
`can be determined. Models can
`also be used to historically match
`production following a fracturing
`treatment to determine which
`treatment achieved which actual
`result. New capabilities are currently
`being developed that will include the
`interaction of the induced fracture
`with natural fractures.
`One of the hydraulic fracturing
`legends, H.K. van Poollen, performed
`work on an electrolytic model
`to determine the effect fracture
`lengths and fl ow capacity would
`have on the production increase
`obtained from wells with different
`drainage radii. Several others
`developed mathematical models for
`similar projections. Today, there
`are models that predict production
`from fractures with multiphase
`
`and non-Darcy fl ow using any
`proppant available.
`
`Fracturing’s Historic Success
`Many fi elds would not exist today
`without hydraulic fracturing. In the US,
`these include the Sprayberry trend in
`west Texas; Pine Island fi eld, Louisiana;
`Anadarko basin; Morrow wells,
`northwestern Oklahoma; the entire San
`Juan basin, New Mexico; the Denver
`Julesburg basin, Colorado; the east
`Texas and north Louisiana trend,
`Cotton Valley; the tight gas sands of
`south Texas and western Colorado; the
`overthrust belt of western Wyoming;
`and many producing areas in the
`northeastern US.
`As the global balance of
`supply and demand forces the
`hydrocarbon industry toward more
`unconventional resources including
`US shales such as the Barnett,
`Haynesville, Bossier, and Marcellus
`gas plays, hydraulic fracturing
`
`will continue to play a substantive
`role in unlocking otherwise
`unobtainable reserves. JPT
`
`References
`Geerstma, J. and de Klerk, F. 1969.
` A Rapid Method of Predicting
` Width and Extent of Hydraulically
`
`Induced Fractures. J. Pet. Tech. 21
` (12):1571–1581.
`van Poollen, H.K., Tinsley, J.M.,
` and Saunders, C.D. 1958.
` Hydraulic Fracturing—Fracture
` Flow Capacity vs. Well Productivity.
`Trans., AIME 213: 91–95. SPE-890-G.
`Hubbard and Willis (1956).
`Khristianovic, S.A. and Zheltov, Y.P.
` 1955. Formation of Vertical
` Fractures by Means of Highly
` Viscous Liquid. Paper 6132 presented
` at the 4th World Petroleum Congress,
` Rome, 6–15 June.
`Perkins, T.K. and Kern, L.R. (1961).
` Widths of Hydraulic Fractures.
`J. Pet. Tech., 13 (9): 937–949. SPE-
`89-PA. DOI: 10.2118/89-PA.
`
`SPE Hydraulic Fracturing
`Technology Conference
`
`(cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:110)(cid:18)(cid:22)(cid:0)(cid:42)(cid:65)(cid:78)(cid:85)(cid:65)(cid:82)(cid:89)(cid:0)(cid:18)(cid:16)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:0)(cid:115)(cid:0)The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel & Convention Center
`The Woodlands, Texas, USA
`
`Register Now!
`
`www.spe.org/events/hftc
`
`32
`
`7 of 16
`
`JPT • DECEMBER 2010
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`

`

`Cleaner fracs
`through
`chemistry.
`
` Introducing the
`Process and Products from Multi-Chem.
`
`Multi-Chem has developed NaturaLine™, a product line and
`product evaluation process that provides environmental
`solutions for your toughest completion challenges.
`
`The NaturaLine products – biocides, friction reducers,
`scale inhibitors and surfactants – can reduce waste
`disposal and water treatment costs, and even chemical usage
`amounts. These custom-designed products reduce toxicity
`in your frac fl uids, produced fl uids and fl owback fl uids.
`
`With the NaturaLine process, Multi-Chem works with operators
`to develop specialized, cost-effective chemical completion
`solutions to protect your well throughout its life cycle.
`
`Ever quizzed about the make-up of your chemical program?
`With Multi-Chem, the answers are easy. For the most
`effective way to select completion chemicals, visit our
`website at www.multichem.com/NaturaLine.
`
`©Copyright 2010. All rights reserved.
`
`8 of 16
`
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`

`

`H Y D R A U L I C
`
`T H E F U S S , T H E F A C T S , T H E F U T U R E
`
`Robin Beckwith, JPT/JPT Online Staff Writer
`
`While precise statistics on the hydraulic fracturing industry are not kept, there is little doubt its use has
`grown precipitously over the past decade. Despite low gas prices, North American fracturing activity is at
`an all-time high, with competition between fracturing companies fi erce, margins slim, and volumes huge.
`With an estimated 4 million hhp of equipment being built in the US, there are waiting lists for services
`and supplies, and delays of up to 9 months are common. China and India are investigating the potential
`of unconventional-gas resources that demand the use of hydraulic fracturing to produce at commercial
`fl ow rates, and also are stepping up investment in North American and Australian shale acreage. European
`countries like Hungary, Poland, Germany, and France—keen on easing dependence on Russian energy—are
`also looking to exploit their tight resources.
`
`34
`
`9 of 16
`
`JPT • DECEMBER 2010
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`

`

`Fig. 1—Estimated size of the global fracturing market since 1999.
`Courtesy: Michael Economides, Energy Tribune.
`
`Fig. 2—Equipped with 8,250 hhp and 15,000 psi-capable pumps
`and manifolds, Halliburton’s Stim Star Angola delivers a wide
`range of stimulation services offshore West Africa.
`Photo courtesy: Halliburton.
`
`But it is not all about shale. With
`2007 estimated service-company
`hydraulic fracturing revenues
`representing a global market of
`USD 13 billion (Fig. 1), up from
`approximately USD 2.8 billion in
`1999, the technique is now more
`than ever a vital practice enabling
`continued economic exploitation
`of hydrocarbons throughout the
`world—from high-permeability oil
`fi elds in Alaska, the North Sea, and
`Russia, to unconsolidated formations
`in the Gulf of Mexico, Santos Basin,
`and offshore West Africa (Fig. 2), to
`unconventional resources such as
`shale and coalbed methane (CBM)
`developments (Fig. 3).
`
`What Is Driving the Rise
`in Hydraulic Fracturing?
`It is not surprising to fi nd that
`North America is home to an
`estimated 85% of the total number of
`hydraulic fracturing spreads (Fig. 4)
`(according to Michael Economides,
`a spread is the equivalent of four
`fracturing units, a blender, and
`ancillary equipment)—including land
`(Fig. 5) and offshore equipment.
`This stems from its mature,
`reliable infrastructure, fueled by
`the dependence of a population
`long used to creating demand. The
`
`phenomenal increase in US proved
`reserves of natural gas—from a 20-
`year low in 1994 of 162.42 Tcf to its
`2009 estimated 244.66 Tcf—is the
`direct result of advances in hydraulic
`fracturing and horizontal drilling.
`The scramble for this resource,
`however, giving rise to what an IHS
`CERA report calls the “shale gale,”
`is the result in North America to
`avert what was predicted earlier
`in the century to be the need to
`import vast quantities of natural
`gas in the form of liquefi ed natural
`gas (LNG) from farfl ung locations.
`Although shale and CBM are also
`widely prevalent outside the US, the
`need in most countries—with the
`possible exception of the European
`Economic Union—to turn to them,
`
`remains less urgent, as conventional
`resources remain far from depleted.
`Indeed, the top three countries in
`terms of estimated proved natural-
`gas reserves—Russia, Iran, and
`Qatar—held a combined total 14.5
`times that in the US, at 3,563.55 Tcf
`year-end 2009, 57% of the world’s
`2009 total estimated proved reserves
`of 6,261.29 Tcf. So, while hydraulic
`fracturing and natural gas—and to
`a certain extent oil—extraction have
`been linked in the recent focus on
`unconventional shale resources
`within the US, the long-term future
`lies well outside that country.
`Currently within North America,
`10 or more fracture-treatment
`stages are performed to stimulate
`production along a horizontal
`
`Fig. 3—Estimate of approximate breakdown of fracture treatments by well type.
`Courtesy: Michael Economides, Energy Tribune.
`
`H Y D R A U L I C F R A C T U R I N G T H E F U S S , T H E F A C T S , T H E F U T U R E
`10 of 16
`
`35
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`

`

`the US has been fast—propelled in
`part by regulatory requirements
`in most areas throughout North
`America to reveal fracturing and
`production-performance data within
`6 months following execution,
`which competitors can then plunder
`for insight. The US also benefi ted
`from a tax incentive created in
`the 1980s, which, along with high
`gas prices, jump-started US tight
`gas exploitation. By 1992, when
`the incentive ended, the resulting
`infrastructure, critical mass, and
`expertise were in place to continue
`economically without incentives.
`Driven by increasing demand
`for power generation, countries
`like China and India are eager to
`cost-effectively develop their own
`resources, as well as participate
`in the boom that has struck US
`shale. In August, both nations
`signed agreements with the US
`State Department allowing the US
`Geological Survey to evaluate data
`on potential shale plays within
`those countries to determine if the
`formations possess recoverable gas.
`They are also grabbing up
`resources within the US. For
`example, India’s largest company,
`Reliance Industries, led by
`billionaire Mukesh Ambani, has
`purchased shares in US shales worth
`USD 3.4 billion so far this year.
`Ambani appears to be pursuing a
`learn-as-you-earn strategy. Evidence
`for this can be found in the nature of
`the joint venture into which Reliance
`entered with Carrigo Oil & Gas on
`Marcellus Shale acreage in central
`and northeast Pennsylvania in
`early August. Reliance holds a 60%
`interest and Carrigo is the operator,
`but Reliance has the option to act
`as operator in certain regions in the
`coming years. Ambani expects to
`build on what his company learns
`about techniques like fracturing
`while profi ting as approximately
`1,000 wells are drilled over the
`next 10 years within a net resource
`potential of about 3.4 Tcfe (2.0 Tcfe
`to Reliance).
`Smaller countries, like France
`and Norway, are pursuing similar
`
`11 of 16
`
`JPT • DECEMBER 2010
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`Fig. 4—Estimated global distribution of fracturing equipment, including land fracturing
`spreads and offshore vessels.
`
`borehole, while typically outside
`North America, the number of
`fracture-treatment stages per well
`is rarely more than two or three.
`Low natural-gas prices and lack of
`infrastructure are two key drivers
`for this phenomenon. Outside
`North America, service companies
`have yet to establish—or benefi t
`from—suffi cient infrastructure or
`gain enough experience to deliver
`consistent results.
`Costs that service companies
`must deal with per well tend to be
`three to four times higher outside
`North America due to such factors
`as fragile distribution channels or
`poorly performing equipment and
`personnel. The result is that service
`
`Fig. 5—Hydraulic fracturing treatment,
`Woodford Shale, Canadian County,
`Oklahoma, for which Halliburton provided
`52,000 hhp.
`
`36
`
`companies must charge higher
`prices to remain economically
`viable, which in turn makes it
`highly unattractive for operators to
`permit learning, through practice
`and analysis, about the formation
`and about how to run the fl eet
`and crew. However, a practical
`way to combat this, according to
`BP Exploration senior petroleum
`engineer and adviser Martin
`Rylance, is to deeply focus on the
`operational quality assurance/quality
`control and execution on the pilot
`fracture treatments, and simply
`overdesign these treatments with
`more length and conductivity than
`strictly necessary. Optimization of
`the fracture treatments can be an
`evolving story as more treatments
`are performed. The absolute key,
`said Rylance, is to fi rst establish
`effective, competent, and successful
`fracturing and economical results.
`The development and
`application of hydraulic fracturing
`technology in the US has been
`driven by independents, with a
`low cost base and the critical mass
`necessary to learn and respond
`quickly to new developments in
`modeling, planning, fl uids, and
`proppants technology. With plays
`containing dozens of operators, each
`seeking technical and economic
`advantage over the other, the pace
`of technological development in
`
`

`

`Welcome to the new age
` of reservoir stimulation.
`
`STEWARDSHIP
`
`CUSTOMER
`SERVICE
`
`OPTIMUM
`PERFORMANCE
`
`ECOENVIRONMENTAL
`
`G R E E N
`
`Yes, you can have it all. A stimulation solution that optimizes well performance, provides
`world-class customer service, AND uses revolutionary GREEN technologies to help protect the
`environment. Welcome to ECO-Green. Welcome to Frac Tech. www.fractech.net/eco-green
`
`Toll Free: 866.877.1008 www.fractech.net
`
`Stage After Stage
`
`12 of 16
`
`Ex. 2087
`IPR2016-01506
`
`

`

`in late 2008 when it fi rst acquired
`acreage from Chesapeake, and
`aims to have shale production of
`50,000 BOEPD from these assets
`by 2012. The company intends to
`build infrastructure and confi dence
`through its Chesapeake joint
`venture to become an operator of
`unconventional-gas assets.
`Another strategy is to invite
`experienced foreign companies
`to share in exploiting home-front
`shales. For example, China’s largest
`listed gas producer, Petrochina, and
`Royal Dutch Shell have partnered
`to develop shale-gas resources
`in China’s Sichuan province.
`PetroChina, however, is hedging its
`bets: It also has planned USD 60
`billion in overseas investments to
`boost its oil and gas output, following
`the example of other companies
`like China Petroleum & Chemical
`Corporation and CNOOC.
`
`Keeping the Fracture
`Open: Proppants
`With the rapid rise in hydraulic
`fracturing over the past decade,
`the number of proppant suppliers
`worldwide has increased from
`a handful to more than 30 sand
`producers, nine resin coaters, and at
`least 10 ceramic manufacturers.
`According to a 2009 global
`proppant market study by D.
`Anschutz and B. Olmen, published
`by PropTester and Kelrik in early
`2010, proppant consumption was
`a low-growth market through the
`1990s, but rose from an estimated
`3 billion pounds in 1999 to total
`consumption of nearly 20 billion
`pounds in 2009 (Fig. 6).
`Proppant grain size has become
`fi ner as the use of slickwater
`fracturing has increased, with
`20/40 the dominant gradation
`throughout the 1990s and early
`2000s. However, according to
`Kelrik owner Olmen, “Slickwater
`fracturing of unconventional-gas
`resources represents nothing short
`of a paradigm shift in its impact
`on proppant volumes, types, and
`sizes.” The result is that today the
`
`use of 30/50 and 40/70 sand and
`resin-coated sand, 40/80 ceramics,
`and 100-mesh sands of various
`gradations is common.
`It is interesting to note, however,
`that the use of proppants 16/20 or
`larger in fractures performed in West
`Siberia, for example, has increased
`from 43% of the jobs in 2003 to more
`than 90% of the jobs today—indicative
`of trends elsewhere that buck those
`occurring in North America.
`North America remains
`the dominant manufacturer
`of proppant (Fig. 7). The fi rst
`non-US plant designed to produce
`fracture sand meeting API RP 56
`recommendations was built in
`1985 by Colorado Silica Sand near
`Chelford, England. A select few
`small natural-sand and resin coating
`operations followed in countries
`such as England, Denmark, Poland,
`and Saudi Arabia. But, according to
`Olmen, the real development outside
`North America has been in the
`production of high-strength ceramics
`and sintered bauxite. Brazil, Russia,
`and China, for example, have
`established substantial synthetic-
`proppant manufacturing capacities,
`all of which export to North America.
`
`The Vital Need for Fluids
`Vast shales are the deposits of oceans
`that existed in the Paleozoic and
`Mesozoic eras and as such present
`resources whose steady exploitation
`will last many decades—even
`centuries. Plenty of these shales
`were in fact the known source rocks
`for many already widely developed
`oil and gas formations. Now these
`source rocks are themselves turning
`out to be excellent reservoirs.
`However, outside North
`America, such resources represent
`a far longer-term frontier, with most
`hydraulic fractures still perf

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket