throbber
HOME
`
`INTERNET OF THINGS
`
`DRILLING & COMPLETIONS
`
`ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & SAFETY
`
`SOFTWARE
`
`MORE
`
`BECOME A MEMBER
`
`HELP
`
`RSS FEED
`
`Search ...
`Advanced Search
`
`
`
`THE LATEST ISSUE
`Open-Hole Or Cased And Cemented
`Weighing the pros and cons of completion choices for multifrac
`horizontals
`[Print Article: November 2011, by By Pat Roche] As the use of multiple fracture
`stimulations in horizontal wellbores skyrocketed in recent years, a debate
`emerged over the best completion method: open-hole ball drop or cased and
`cemented holes?
`
`It boils down to a question of whether mechanical packers or cement provide the
`best means of isolating between frac stages during multiple completions in
`horizontal wellbores.
`
`Murray Reynolds, a veteran completions engineer with TAQA North Ltd., looked
`at the advantages and disadvantages of each system in a presentation at an
`Infocast tight oil conference in Calgary in September.
`
`The open-hole ball-drop system is typically associated with Calgary-based
`Packers Plus Energy Services Inc., though a number of competitors also run
`similar systems. A packer is set in the external casing, uncemented. In the case of
`the Packers Plus StackFRAC system, balls made of thermal-plastic material such
`as Teflon are dropped into the well to shift a sleeve, isolate the previous frac and
`open the next frac port up-hole.
`
`Other open-hole systems use a dart instead of a ball to shift the sleeve. Others
`use swellable packers where an elastomer element reacts with the wellbore fluid
`or temperature to expand, thus creating a seal with the open-hole. Depending on
`conditions, it could take a week or more for these to be set up in a wellbore before
`a frac operation begins.
`Most of the fractured horizontal well completions in western Canada use open-
`hole packer-based systems, which may be the cheapest option.
`
`The Barnett shale is currently almost 100 per cent cased and cemented.
`Reynolds noted that early experiments with open-hole gave poorer results from
`the standpoint of microseismic monitoring as well as production performance.
`On the other side of the debate are the advocates of fully cemented liners. These
`wells are typically more expensive ¿to complete, but allow maximum control of
`fracture placement, providing there is good ¿cementing in the horizontal section,
`which can sometimes be a challenge.
`
`Listing the pros and cons of each system, Reynolds said the big advantage of the
`open-hole packer system is that it's a ¿continuous frac process. It can be done
`quickly if logistics allow everything to be located on site. "If you're pumping
`100,000 kilograms per fracture stage, you might not be able to do it all in one
`day," he said. "But generally...you can do 15 fracs in a day, or more."
`
`6/24/2015
`
`Open­Hole Or Cased And Cemented
`
`http://www.newtechmagazine.com/index.php/news/archived­articles/1853­open­hole­or­cased­and­cemented
`
`1/4
`
`

`
`NEW TECHNOLOGY MAGAZINE SUPPLEMENT
`
`MULTISTAGE FRACKING 
`AND HORIZONTAL DRILLING
`
`FOUNDATIONS MAGAZINE
`
`PRESCRIPTION FOR PROGRESS
`
`Other advantages include high pump rates and the fact that there's no frac fluid or
`proppant limit. Also, Reynolds said open-hole completions may enjoy a slight cost
`advantage over cased and cemented wells.
`
`On the downside, one of the disadvantages of open-hole ¿systems is the
`number of frac intervals has historically been limited to about 24 stages. ¿"But
`now multiplier systems ¿are becoming available where we can frac up to 60
`stages," ¿so there may be fewer limits ¿in the number of stages, Reynolds
`conceded.
`
`Open-hole systems have less control over frac length and frac placement, he
`said. "In tight oil, as in tight gas, fracture half-length is everything." Frac ¿half-
`length refers to the radial distance from the wellbore to the outer tip of a fracture.
`Also, he said setting the hydraulic packers may create frac initiation points.
`
`If the balls aren't recovered, the operator may need to mill out the balls and seats,
`adding significant cost. However, Reynolds noted one vendor has retrievable
`ball/seat assemblies.
`
`Looking at the pros and cons of the cased and cemented systems, Reynolds said
`two big advantages are longer fracs and more control over where each frac
`initiates. He believes one of the biggest future innovations of cemented
`completions will be the opportunity to use cemented frac ports, which can be
`shifted with a ball or coiled tubing.
`
`"This is, I think, the future. We've run a couple of these. [We've had] very good
`results in terms of fracture placement and productivity," he said about cemented
`frac ports, which he called a "potential breakthrough technology for cemented
`completions."
`
`He said cemented frac ports are currently being used in relatively shallow
`applications such as in Viking tight oil in Saskatchewan.
`
`Other new technologies for cased-hole frac isolation include composite bridge
`plugs that can be easily milled out. Reynolds said Halliburton Energy Services
`has a self-removing bridge plug that can be set on a timer to explode into a pile of
`ceramic dust-"a really good way to remove bridge plugs."
`
`On the downside, it takes ¿longer to frac the same number of intervals in a
`cased and cemented well than in an open-hole well. This is because of the time it
`takes to perforate and the fact that it isn't a continuous process.
`"People who are looking strictly at cost are going to probably stick with ball-drop
`systems," Reynolds said. But if the operator and its service companies are adept-
`and don't encounter any problems that extend the operation-the cemented
`completion "can be cost competitive," he added.
`
`In some cases, reservoir conditions may dictate the use of cased and cemented
`completions. In the Horn River, for example, packer systems can't withstand the
`high temperatures.
`Reynolds said many innovative tools and techniques are emerging that he
`believes have the potential to change the way multi-fractured horizontal wells are
`completed in the future. "Hang onto your hat-there's a lot of technical innovation
`going on," he said.
`
`You are here: Home
`
` Archived News
`
` Open-Hole Or Cased And Cemented
`
`Top
`
`TWITTER FEED
`
`BLOG
`
`NEW TWITTER UPDATES
`
`Alberta Mulls Splitting Energy Regulator From
`Promoter Role
`(Reuters) —Alberta, is considering splitting its
`
`6/24/2015
`
`Open­Hole Or Cased And Cemented
`
`http://www.newtechmagazine.com/index.php/news/archived­articles/1853­open­hole­or­cased­and­cemented
`
`2/4
`
`

`
`energy regulator to avoid a potential conflict with its
`role as
`...
`
`Recent Equity Financings Tied To M&A
`Since the beginning of April of this year roughly
`$1.6 billion in equity has been raised concurrent
`with merger and
`...
`
`Daily Infographic: More Takeaway Capacity
`Needed
`An expansion of the existing transportation
`infrastructure is needed to connect growing crude
`oil supply from
`...
`
`TransCanada And Encana Cut Jobs
`(Reuters) — Pipeline company TransCanada
`Corporation and oil and gas producer Encana
`...
`
`From Twitter Web Client
`msmith Ramifications Of Moore’s Law Lead To Trillions
`Added To Global Economy: IHS http://t.co/WIbfzCt3VD
`oilandgas http://t.co/bhwAsv1JaN
`About 16 hours ago
`
`From Twitter Web Client
`msmith Axalta And Hempel Form Strategic Oil And Gas
`Pipeline Coating Partnership http://t.co/ADaym7iT76
`oilandgas pipelines
`About 16 hours ago
`
`From Twitter Web Client
`msmith Mooring Integrity Monitoring In Today’s Market:
`How BMT Is Answering The Challenge
`http://t.co/RNnnkqHpcS oilandgas http://t.co/0kuZjrMPQy
`About 16 hours ago
`
`From Twitter Web Client
`msmith Kelvin Hughes Supplies SharpEye VTS Radar For
`Ichthys Field FPSO In Australia http://t.co/24mHkCvXA9
`oilandgas http://t.co/vZVA1he7xK
`About 16 hours ago
`
`From Twitter Web Client
`msmith Colorado Cleantech Industries Association
`Accepting Applications For Oil & Gas Cleantech Challenge
`http://t.co/2VFBi3pAQy oilandgas
`About 16 hours ago
`
`Follow
`
`The most trusted source for energy information in Canada
`Contact Us
`Get To Know Us
`Careers
`
`Visit our full product range
`
`Advertise
`
`Become a member
`
`Other websites in our network:
`Alberta Construction Magazine
`Alberta's Industrial Heartland
`The Basin
`Canadian Oilsands Navigator
`COSSD
`Daily Oil Bulletin
`Data Central
`Environmental Innovations Guidebook & Directory
`Heavy Oil & Oilsands Guidebook
`Maintenance Repair Operations
`
`Webinar Series - Harnessing the Power of Data Views :
`43
`
`BP Alaska: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Pilot Testing
`Views : 2361244
`more
`
`6/24/2015
`
`Open­Hole Or Cased And Cemented
`
`http://www.newtechmagazine.com/index.php/news/archived­articles/1853­open­hole­or­cased­and­cemented
`
`3/4
`
`

`
`Multistage Fracturing and Horizontal Drilling
`New Technology Magazine
`Oilfield Atlas
`Oilsands Review
`Oilweek
`Oilweek East Coast Supplement
`Profiler
`POST Report
`Rig Locator
`Unconventional Resource Guidebook
`Affiliated partners:
`CanOils
`Evaluate Energy Limited
`Glacier Media Inc.
`Specialty Technical Publishers
`
`© JuneWarren­Nickle's Energy Group. All rights reserved.
`
`Privacy Policy | Licence Agreement | Cancellation and Refund Policy
`
`JuneWarren­Nickle's Energy Group is a division of 
`
` an information communications company.
`
`6/24/2015
`
`Open­Hole Or Cased And Cemented
`
`http://www.newtechmagazine.com/index.php/news/archived­articles/1853­open­hole­or­cased­and­cemented
`
`4/4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket