BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED
`AND BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD
`OPERATIONS, INC.
`EXHIBIT 1019
`BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED
`AND BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD
`OPERATIONS, INC. v. PACKERS
`PLUS ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
`IPR2016-00598
`
`Page 1 of 20
`
`

`

`AFFIDAVIT OF NANCY CHAFFIN HUNTER
`
`1.
`
`My name is Nancy Chaffin Hunter.
`
`I am currently the Coordinator of
`
`Acquisitions and Metadata Services at Colorado State University Libraries (“CSU
`
`Libraries”) in Fort Collins, Colorado.
`
`I have served in this position since
`
`December 2012, and am responsible for overseeing acquisitions and cataloguing.
`
`I
`
`previously served as a Metadata Librarian for CSU Libraries from February 2001
`
`to November 2012. Based on my job duties and experience in these positions, I
`
`have personal knowledge of the below statements.
`
`2.
`
`CSU Libraries maintains records of the dates on which books are received
`
`and catalogued through its Integrated Library System (“ILS”) software, which has
`
`been in use since before February 8, 2000. These records are maintained in the
`
`ordinary course of business of CSU Libraries, and I am personally familiar with
`
`these records in the ordinary course of my job duties for CSU Libraries.
`
`3.
`
`I have been asked to confirm when the following book was catalogued and
`
`publicly available at CSU Libraries: Proceedings: Production Operations
`
`Symposium, 2-4 April 1995, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, published by the Society
`
`of Petroleum Engineers, Inc. (“the Book”).
`
`I have reviewed CSU Libraries’
`
`records relating to the Book. Attached as Appendix A is a true and correct copy of
`
`certain pages of the Book. Attached as Appendix B is a true and correct copy of a
`
`portion of a publicly accessible CSU Libraries webpage showing the bibliographic
`
`1
`
`Page 2 of 20
`Page 2 of 20
`
`

`

`record for the Book as of July 22, 2016 under the “Librarian View” tab at the
`
`following web address:
`
`http:Hdiscovery.library.colostate.edui’Recordf.b22793069HDetails. Attached as
`
`Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of a screenshot that I generated of the
`
`bibliographic entry for the Book in CSU Libraries’ ILS software. Attached as
`
`Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a screenshot that I generated of the item
`
`record for the Book in CSU Libraries’ ILS software.
`
`4.
`
`The title listed in Appendices B, C, and D has a minor typographical error
`
`that refers to “Operations” instead of “Operation” within the phrase “Production
`
`Operation Symposium.” However, other information confirms that the records
`
`shown in Appendices B, C, and D refer to the Book. The remainder of the title
`
`(including “2-4 April 1995” and “Oklahoma City, OK” shown in Appendices B, C,
`
`and D matches what is shown on the cover page in Appendix A, and the 1995
`
`copyright date in Appendices B, C, and D matches the 1995 date shown on the
`
`copyright page in Appendix A. Also, the unique identifier “S-A-23B-l 1-08-013”
`
`listed alongside field 945 in Appendix B and near the bottom of Appendix D
`
`corresponds to the number shown on the title page in Appendix A.
`
`5.
`
`CSU Libraries’ records confirm that the Book was catalogued, and therefore
`
`made available to the public, at CSU Libraries on February 8, 2000. Appendix B
`
`shows this date as “02-08-00” in part “|b” alongside the first field 998, and as
`
`2
`
`Page 3 of 20
`Page 3 of 20
`
`

`

`“000208” in part “Ic” alongside the second field 998. The first of these date fields
`
`is user-entered on the day on which a book is catalogued and made available to the
`
`public. The second of these date fields is system-generated on the day on which
`
`the bibliographic record for the Book was created in CSU Libraries’ ILS System
`
`software records, and this date field is not editable. Appendix C also shows these
`
`dates as “CAT DATE 02-08-2000” and “Created: 02-08-2000,” respectively.
`
`Appendix D also shows the second date as “Created: 02—08-2000.”
`
`6.
`
`Books are made available to the public as soon as they are catalogued, which
`
`often occurs on the same day that they are entered into the CSU Libraries ILS
`
`sofiware, as CSU Libraries’ records show was the case for the Book.
`
`7.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
` M at
`
`22‘
`
`
`
`Date
`
`NancyC
`
`fin Hu
`
`Page 4 of 20
`Page 4 of 20
`
`

`

`"""1HI}|1INIHEIVIIIHIHWIIWNHI'MIHITm
`80023361.
`
`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIXA
`
`.’
`
`I)..."
`
`PROCEEDINGS
`
`Production Operation Symposium
`
`2—4 April 1995
`Oklahoma City, OK
`
`SOCIETY OF PET S'A'23B'11-03-013 5(SPE),INC.
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 20
`Page 5 0f 20
`
`
`

`

`
`
`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIXA
`
`PUBLICATION RIGHTS RESERVED
`
`All papers in this volume were presented at the Production Operations Symposium held in
`Oklahoma City, OK. 2—4 April 1995. Permission to copy is restricted to an abstract of not more
`than 300 words. Illustrations may not be copied. The abstract should contain conspicuOus ac—
`knowledgment of where and by whom the paper was presented. Any other use of material in
`this volume is subject to prior approval. in writing, and payment of any applicable fees. Con-
`tact the Librarian at SPE Headquarters.
`
`DiscuSSion ofthe papers is invited. Three copies of any discussion should be sent to the Society
`of Petroleum Engineers office. Such disCussion may be presented at the Conference and. with
`the paper, may be considered for publication in one of the SPE journals.
`
`COPYRIGHT 1995
`
`SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS (SPE), INC.
`
`Page 6 of 20
`Page 6 of 20
`
`

`

`
`
`PROGRAM COMMITTEE
`
`Maston L. Powers. Chairman
`Consultant
`
`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIXA
`
`Kevin H. Bjornen
`Dowel! Schlumberger Inc.
`
`R. Lee Dillenbeck
`
`The Western Co. of N. America
`
`Donald W. Fryhofer
`Oxy USA Inc.
`
`Rick D. Gdanski
`
`Halliburton Energy Services
`
`Dave M. Jones
`3] Services
`
`Jim F. Lea
`
`Amoco Production Co.
`
`Steve Nelson
`
`Kerr-McGee Corp.
`
`Jeff A. Peles
`
`Marathon Oil Co.
`
`Torn Pepper
`
`Devon Energy Corp.
`
`Sally A. Thomas
`Conoco Inc.
`
`David Watson
`Southern Intl. Inc.
`
`Mike L. Wiggins
`U. of Oklahoma
`
`Q’M‘LKE f";
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 20
`Page 7 of 20
`
`

`

` —DII
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`CONTENTS
`
`SPE 27851
`
`SPE 289??
`
`SPE 29446
`
`SPE 29448
`
`SPE 29449
`
`SPE 29450
`
`SPE 29451
`
`SPE 29453
`
`New Pressure Tool Development Yields Critical Bottomhole Data .
`AJ. Bond and T T Palisch, Arco Alaska Inc., and RM. Oakley, Petredat inc.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 9
`
`Laboratory Study and Subsequent Field Results of Chemical Stimulations for use in
`Open I-Iole Environments .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.l. La Fontoine‘Mclarol, The Western Co., and SA. Ali. DW. Sanclemente, and B. C. Sketchlen
`Chevron USA ProductiOn Co.
`
`. 17
`
`Improved Fracturing Technologies Provide for Increased Well Productivity: A Case
`Study on Red Fork Formation Wells .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`RM. Hon-Joe-Pin, 3.! Services; R]. Handren, 0rch Energy (30.; and H. D. Brannon, 3,! Services
`
`. 27
`
`Fracture Treatment Modifications and Bottomhole Treating Pressure Analysis in the
`Pictured Cliffs Formation, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`KL. Johnson .lr., 8.! Services Co. USA
`
`. 39
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Fracturing Improvements Enhance Infill Drilling .
`3.]. Miller; Bretagne‘, and R.L. Gillstrorn, Halliburton Energy Services
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 55
`
`Gas-Lift Unloading and Operating Simulation as Applied to Mandrel Spacing and
`Valve Design .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.l.W. Hall, Producing Solutions, and K. L. Decker; Decker Technology
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 63
`
`Continuous-Flow Gas-Lift Installation Design Utilizing Production Pressure—Operated
`Valve Performance .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. 79
`HIV Winkle}; Texas Tech U.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 95
`
`SPE 29454
`
`SPE 29455
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 105
`
`. 117
`
`Production Automation System for Gas Lift Wells
`I
`AG. Cooksey and CM. Pool, Halliburton Energy Services
`Investigation of Intermittent Gas-Lift by Using Mechanistic Modeling .
`T Lino, Amoco Production Research Co., and Z Schmidt and DR. Dory, U. of Tulsa
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Optimum Plunger Lift Operation .
`J. 0.21. Baruzzi and EJ.S. Alhanati, Petrobrds SA.
`
`.
`
`SPE 29456
`
`SPE 2945?
`
`SPE 29458
`
`SPE 29459
`
`SPE 29460
`
`SPE 29461
`
`An Evaluation of Large Diameter Coiled Tubing for Subsurface Production
`Tubulars .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`LS. Adams, Chevron USA Production Co., and L. W. Smith, Precisiou Tube Technology inc.
`
`Comprehensive Analysis of Buckling With Friction .
`RE Mitchell, Enertech Engineering & Research Co.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Collapse and Post-Collapse Behaviour of Tubulars: A Simple Approach .
`E Abbassian and S. Patj‘itt, BP Exploration
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 133
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 139
`
`. 149
`
`A Battery-Operated, Electro-Mechanical Setting Tool for Use With Bridge Plugs and
`Similar Wellbore Tools .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. 163
`LI. Gazda and .lJ. Goiffon, Holliburton Energy Services
`
`An Analysis of Helical Buckling of Tubulars Subjected to Axial and Torsional
`Loading in Inclined Wellbores .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`S. Misha, U. ofTulso, anal .l.C.S. Cunha, Petrobras SA.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 173
`
`.
`
`. 181
`
`SPE 29462
`
`SPE 29464
`
`SPE 29465
`
`Coiled Tubing Working Life Prediction .
`Jiang Wu, Maurer Engineering inc.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Effects of Well Deviation on Helical Buckling .
`RE Mitchell, Enertech Engineering & Research Co.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 189
`
`Determining Permeability, Skin Effect, and Drainage Area From the Inverted Decline
`Curve .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. 199
`
`N.D. Rietman, Maxus Energy Corp.
`
`Prediction of Future Well Performance: Including Reservoir Depletion Effects .
`B. D. Poe Jr. and J. L. Elbel, Schlumberger Dowell,‘ J.B. Spath, Schlumberger Wireline cl: Testing;
`Page 8 of 20
`and ML. Wiggins, U. ofOklahoma
`Page 8 Of 20
`
`.
`
`. 209
`
`.
`
`4
`
`

`

`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIXA
`
`SPE 29466
`
`An Evaluation of a Method to Predict Unknown Water Levels in Reservoirs and
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Quantifying the Uncertainty .
`B. Haynes .lr., BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`The Effect of an Initial Gas Saturation on the Performance of a Waterflood .
`H. Dylcstra, Consultant
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Viscosity Correlations for Gulf of Mexico Crude Oils .
`GE. Petroslcy .lrz, Chevron USA Production Co.. and FE Farshad, U. of Southwestern Louisiana
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 225
`
`. 233
`
`. 249
`
`Economic Potential and Optimum Steamflood Strategies for Trough Reservoirs of
`San Joaquin Valley, California .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`K. C. Hong and DJ. Use. Chevron USA Production Co.
`
`. 259
`
`Circulatable Hole Monitoring With Real-Time Correction: Case Histories .
`.l. E. Griffin and KM. Ravi, Halllburton Energy Services
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 271
`
`Expansion—Contraction Cycles for Cement Optimized as a Function of Additives .
`S. Talabani and G. Hareland. New Mexico Inst. of Mining & Technology
`
`. 277
`
`Field Experience With Application of Blast Furnace Slag to the Drilling and
`Cementing Program in the Stratton Field, South Texas .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`DJ. Daulton, The Western Ca: S. Bosworth, Union Pacific Resources Co.; B. Pumphrey,
`S. McCarthy and R. Cantu. The Western Co. ; and .l. Clendennen, Zarsky Drilling Fluids
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 285
`
`Thickness Optimization of Drilling Fluid Filter Cakes for Cement Slurry Filtrate
`Control and Long-Tenn Zonal Isolation .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.l.E. Griffith, Halliburton Energy Services, and 3.0. Osisaya, U. of Oklahoma
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 301
`
`Shut-off of a Geopressured Water Channel Behind Casing Via Coiled Tubing
`.
`Utilizing a Dual Slurry Cement System: A Case History .
`.
`.
`.-
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`TIW. Nowak, Chevron USA Production Co.; TS. Patout. Schlumberger Dowell; and KJ. Lange
`and WH. Grant, Chevron USA
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 309
`
`Water Shutoff Through Fullbore Placement of Polymer Gel in Faulted and in
`Hydraulically Fractured Producers of the Prudhoe Bay Field .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`RH. Lane and GS. Sanders, Arco Alaska Inc.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 319
`
`SPE 29467
`
`SPE 29468
`
`SPE 29469
`
`SPE 29470
`
`SPE 29471
`
`SPE 29472
`
`SPE 29473
`
`' SPE 29474
`
`SPE 29475
`
`SPE 29476
`
`.
`
`. .. 331
`
`
`
`SPE 29477
`
`SPE 29478
`
`SPE 29479
`
`SPE 29480
`
`SPE 29482
`
`SPE 29484
`
`SPE 29485
`
`SPE 29486
`
`SPE 29487
`
`Case Histories and Laboratory Studies of Sheath Deposition Inside
`Casing Strings .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.l.E. Griffith, Halliburton Energy Services, and S. Osisanya. U. of Oklahoma
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Pr0cess Redesign of Production Maintenance Operations .
`M. Rankin, Pool Co.; B. Lowe. Coastal Management Corp; and 1’! Disney and K. Spilman.
`Texas A&M U.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 343
`
`Detecting Production Tubing Leak by Time Resolved Geochemical Analysis
`of Oils .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.- .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 355
`
`R]. Hwang, Chevron Petroleum Technology Co., and RJ. Elsingei; Humble Instrument Inc.
`
`Prediction of Bottomhole Flowing Pressures in Multiphase Systems Using a
`. 369
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Thermodynamic Equation of State .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`M.A. Barrufet and A.S. Rasool. Texas A&M U., and M. Aggoui; King Fahd U. of Petroleum & Minerals
`
`Production Enhancement Partnerships—Successful Business Arrangements .
`L. Cable, K. Weitzel. L. Attai, and K. Gray. Halliburton Energy Services
`
`An Investigation of Procedures and Economics of Spill Site Remediation .
`DR Abbott and .l. D. Hillard, Rice Engineering Corp.
`
`Large Scale Oil Lease Automation and Electronic Custody Transfer
`C.R. Price and D. C. Elmer; Union Pacific Resources Co.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 381
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 391
`
`. 395
`
`Design, Installation, and Operation of a Safety System for a Pressure Maintenance
`Project: A Case Study .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`SM. Campbell and 3.0. Osisanya, U. of Oklahoma
`
`. 409
`
`Lithium Bromide Chiller Technology in Gas Processing .
`MA. Huey, Nicol & Assocs., and D. Leppin, Gas Research lnst.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`Downhole Emulsion Breaker Injection into the Gas Lift Stream .
`DE Lagerlefi SJ: Sindelar. WG. McLelland, and DJ. Blumer; Arco Alaska inc.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 419
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. 427
`Page 9 of 20
`Page 9 of 20
`
`5
`
`

`

`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIXA
`
`SPE 29488
`
`SPE 29489
`
`SPE 29490
`
`SPE 29491
`
`Solid Particle Deposition During Turbulent Flow Production Operations .
`J. Escohedo and GA. Mansoori, U. of lilinois
`
`A Novel Approach to Predict the Co-Precipitation of BaSo4 and SrSo4 .
`Y-H. Li, SJ). Crane, and JR. Coleman, Arco E&P Technology
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 439
`
`. 44'1"r
`
`A Field Example of a Gas Orifice Meter With Debris-Ridden Liquid in
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Mist Flow .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`1.1.. Chisholm and CV Mooney, Texas A&M U. ; L. Datta-Barua. Enron Operating Co. ; and
`R]. Feldmann, Arthur Anderson & Co.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 463
`
`Computer Simulator of Coiled Tubing Wellbore Clean—Outs in Deviated Wells
`Recommends Optimum Pump Rate and Fluid Viscosity .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`l. C. Walton, Schlurnberger Dowel!
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 471
`
`SPE 29495
`
`Case Studies Suggest a Better Approach to Analyzing Collapse of Inclined
`Boreholes
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`B. Guo, G. Homeland, and P. Boonyapaluk, New Mexico Inst. of Mining & Technology
`
`SPE 29496
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 483
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. .
`
`. 489
`
`
`
`_.....__..a.m..w-4H,m....__T_...
`
`Slack-Off Load Transmission in Horizontal and Inclined Wells
`J. Wu, Maurer Engineering Inc.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`SPE 29497
`
`SPE 29498
`
`SPE 29499
`
`SPE 29500
`
`SPE 29501
`
`SPE 29502
`
`Statistical Analyses of Shape Factor and Productivity Index for Horizontal Wells .
`S.A. Faruqi, D. Malekzadeh, and JJ. Day, Texas Tech U.
`
`. 495
`
`Effectiveness of Fluid Loss Additives in Laboratory Dynamic Fluid Loss
`Experiments
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`D. D. Charles and X. Xie, Louisiana Tech U.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 503
`
`Tests Confirm Operational Status of a Large Slot Flow Apparatus for Characterizing
`Fracturing Fluids .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. 517
`SN. Shah, U. of Oklahoma, and D.L. Lord, Halliburton Energy Services
`
`Fracturing Fluid Interactions With Formation Minerals and Their Subsequent Effect
`on Formation Permeability .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. .
`. 533
`.l.E. Thompson Sr: and CS. Del/ine, 3)“ Services Inc.
`
`Design Guidelines for Artificial Barrier Placement and Their Impact on Factured
`Geometry .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`._.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`R.D. Barree. Marathon Oil Co., and H. Mukheijee, Schlumberger Dowell
`
`.
`
`. 545
`
`Effective Hydraulic Fracture Length and the Determination of Productivity
`Index .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 55'?
`
`SPE 29503
`
`D. Malekzadeh, EU. Khan, and JJ. Day, Texas Tech U.
`Flow Visualization of Flow Into 8 Point-Source Fractures II: The Effect of Fracture
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 571
`
`
`
`Research on Energy Balance Test of Electrical Submersible Pump .
`Cui Zhen-hua and Zhu Jun, Daqing Petroleum lnst.
`
`SPE 29514
`
`SPE 29515
`
`Interference-Test Analysis in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs .
`Q. Ma and D. Tiab, U. of Oklahoma
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`The Carbonate Envelope .
`E. L. Bigelow, Atlas Wireiine Services
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`6
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 641
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. 653
`Page 10 of 20
`Page 10 of 20
`
`Non~Uniformity and Fluid Crosslinking .
`RE. Clark and Q. Zhu, U. ofAlabama
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`SPE 29504
`
`SPE 29505
`
`SPE 29506
`
`SPE 29508
`
`SPE 29511
`
`Fluid Loss Control for High Permeability Rocks in Hydraulic Fracturing Under
`Realistic Shear Conditions .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 579
`
`R. C. Navarrete and if! Mitchell, Schlumberger Dowel!
`
`Optimized Electric Submersible Pumping to Extend Economic Oil Production in a
`High Water Cut Environment
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`DJ. Galles, Centrilifl, and J.B. Larson, Equioi Oil Co.
`
`. 593
`
`Compendium of Electrical Submersible Pump Systems Testing Criteria .
`MD. Durham, U. of Tulsa, and 1E Lea, Amoco Production Co.
`
`Beta Field History: Submersible Pumps in Heavy Crude .
`DE. Carpenter and AA. McCrea, CalResources
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 605
`
`. 619
`
`. 633
`
`

`

`
`
`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIXA
`
`SPE 29516
`
`SPE 2951'.“r
`
`SPE 29518
`
`SPE 29519
`
`SPE 29521
`
`SPE 29523
`
`SPE 29525
`
`SPE 29526
`
`SPE 29528
`
`SPE 295 29
`
`A Lithology Independent Through Casing Porosity and Water Saturation Model .
`M. E. Oraby, Arco Ed’cP Technology
`Optimizing Water Injection Profiles With Oxygen Activation Logging .
`D. R. Schnort; Scnlumberger Well Services
`A Commercial Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology: Evaluation of 322
`Projects .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`JETS Portwood, Alpha Environmental Midcontinent lnc.
`.
`Selective Gel Treatments in the County Line Unit, Oklahoma .
`.l.K. Jasti, Mobil E&P Technical Center; and L. G. Zambrano, Mobil E&P U. S.
`Field Trial of Simultaneous Injection of C02 and Water, Ranger Weber Sand Unit,
`Colorado .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. 719
`D.R. Robie, .l. W Roedell, and R.K. Wackowski, Chevron USA Production Co.
`Integrated Analysis of Production Potential and Profitability of a Horizontal in the
`Lower Glen Rose Formation, Maverick County, Texas .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.l.R. Ammet; TH. Mroz, A.M. Zammerilli, andA.B. Yost ll, US. DOE; G. Muncey, Consultant; and
`RS. Hegeman, Schlumberger Well Services
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 665
`
`. 683
`
`. 693
`
`. 709
`
`. 729
`
`A New Environmentally Safe Crosslinked Polymer for Fluid Loss Control
`R. C. Cole, Halliburton Energy Services, and S.A. Ali, Chevron USA Production Co.
`Measuring Skin While Drilling .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`TWI Englen S. 0. Osisanya, and D. Tial), U. ofOklahoma
`Causes and Solutions to Surface Facilities Upsets Following Acid Stimulation in the
`Gulf of Mexico .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`D. K. Durham, Baker Performance Chemicals lnc.,' S.A. Ali, Chevron USA Production Co.; and
`PJ. Stone, Chevron USA Production Co.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 743
`
`. 755
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`769
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 781
`
`
`
`SPE 29530
`
`SPE 29531
`
`SPE 29532
`
`SPE 29533
`
`SPE 29534
`
`SPE 29535
`
`SPE 29536
`
`SPE 29537
`
`SPE 29538
`
`SPE 29539
`
`Improved Prediction of Foam Diversion in Matrix Acidization .
`S. C. Zeilinget; M. Wang. KR. Kibodeaux, and WR. Rossen, U. of Texas
`Laboratory and Field Evaluation of Organosilane as 3 Formation Fines Stabilizer .
`P20. Stanley, BJ Services Co. USA; SA. Ali, Chevron USA Production Co. .‘ and .l. L. Boles,
`BJ Services Co. USA
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 795
`
`A Comprehensive Approach to Formation Damage Diagnosis and Corresponding
`Stimulation Type and Fluid Selection
`H. Xiong and SA. Holditch, S.A. Holditclt & Assocs. lnc.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`A New Long Stroke Pumping Unit With High Speed .
`D. Wang and X. Cui, Daqing Petroleum Inst; G. Gao, Daqing Petroleum Administrative Bureau;
`2. Huang, Daqing Petroleum lnst.; and B. Hu, Daqing Petroleum Administrative Bureau
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Beam Pump Balancing Based on Motor Power Utilization .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`JEN. McCoy, Ecnometer 00.; RE. Ott, Mobil E&P US. lnc.; A.L. Podio, U. of Texas; F.‘ Collier;
`Mobil Ed’cP U.S. lnc.; and D. Becket; Echotneter Co.
`Using Automation for Optimizing Production Fields .
`M. Vdsquez Outomuro, Corpoven SA.
`An Approach to the Optimum Design of Sucker-Rod Pumping Systems .
`D. Han, ML. Wiggins, and DE. Menzie, U. of Oklahoma
`Production Optimization of Sucker-Rod Pumping Wells Producing Viscous Oil in
`Boscan Field, Venezuela .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`CD. Guirados, J.L. Sandoval, and O. Rivas. lntevep S.A., and H. Troconis, Maraven S.A.
`.
`.
`Decentralized Continuous-Flow Gas Anchor .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`A.L. Podio, U. of Texas; JEN. McCoy, Ecnometer C0,; and MD. Woods, Mobil E&P US. Inc.
`Hydraulic Gas Pump: A Discussion on its Power Usage .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`M. Amani, Texas A&M U.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`8]]
`
`.
`
`. 821
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 835
`
`. 845
`
`. 855
`
`. 867
`
`. 881
`
`. 899
`
`Single-Trip Completion Concept Replaces Multiple Packers and Sliding Sleeves in
`Selective MultiuZone Production and Stimulation Operations .
`.' .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. 911
`Page 1 1 Of 20
`RJ. Coon andDJ. Murray, Baker Oil Tools
`Page 11 of 20
`
`1'
`
`

`

`
`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIXA
`
`SPE 29540
`
`Use of Staged Mill and Mechanical Whipstock Saves Sidetrack Time and Cost
`by up to 50% .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`KS. Kirkwood and MD. Pritchard, Cal Resources
`
`.
`
`. .. 917
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. 927
`
`. 933
`
`. 943
`
`.
`
`. 955
`
`.
`
`. 981
`
`SPE 29541
`
`SPE 29543
`
`SPE 29544
`
`SPE 29545
`
`SPE 29588
`
`SPE 29549
`
`Transient Aspects of Unloading Oil and Gas Wells With Coiled Tubing .
`H. Gu, Schlumberger Dowell
`Drilling Mud Rheology and the API Recommended Measurements .
`RE. Clark, U. ofAlabama
`Characterizing Flow Through a Perforation Using Ultrasonic D0ppler .
`M. Razi, S.L. Morriss. and AL. Podio, U. of Texas
`A New PolymerlGlycol Water-Based System for Stabilizing Troublesome
`Water-Sensitive Shales .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`MA. Jarrett, Baker Hughes lNTEQ
`Intrepretation of Fracture Height From Temperature Logs—The Effect of
`WellboreiFracture Separation .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`ER. Davis, Conoco Inca; D. Zhu, U. of Texas; and A.D. Hill, U. of Texas
`Development of a Completion Design to Control Screenouts Caused by Multiple
`Near-Wellbore Fractures .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. .
`.
`.
`.
`. .
`.
`.
`.
`.l.M. Stadulis, Cross Timbers Oil Co.
`
`. .
`
`. 965
`
`No manuscript received for the following:
`
`SPE 29443
`
`SPE 29444
`
`SPE 29463
`
`SPE 29483
`
`SPE 29492
`
`SPE 29507
`
`A Case History of Completing and Fracture Stimulating a Horizontal Well
`P. Hagist, Pennzoil; H.H. Abass, Halliburlon Energy Services: J. Harry, Pennzoil; .l.L. Hunt.
`Halliburton Energy Services; M. Shumway, Pennzoil; and M. Besler; Halliburron Energy Services
`Step-Rate, Calibration Injection, and Treating Pressure Annmalies in Soft High Perm
`Formations: An Explanation Based on BHP and Production Results
`B.R. Stewart and M.E. Mullen, Pennzoil E&P; and .l. E. Brown and WD. Norman, Schlumberger Dowell
`
`Development of a New Theoretical Model for Three-Layered Reservoirs
`A. Aly, Texas A&M UJSchlumberger; and WJ. Lee, Texas A&M U.
`
`Managing Corporate Environmental Costs and Liabilities
`.l.D. Plait, CJ. Herlugson, .l. McDonagh. and S. Tayon BP Exploration (Alaska) lnc.
`Analysis of Reverse-Circulation Air Drilling of Horizontal Wells
`MA. Adewumi and S. Tian, Pennsylvania State U.
`
`The Use of Downhole Electric Submersible Pumps in a High Temperature
`Steamflood
`
`M. C. Wood and B. Laughlin, Union Pacific Recources Co., and D. Fuller and B. Fickes, fidelands
`Oil Production
`
`SPE 29509
`
`Important Production Systems Considerations in Stimulation Evaluation of
`Oil Wells
`
`SPE 29510
`
`SPE 29522
`
`J.E Lem Amoco Production Co., and H. Mukhetjee, Schlumberger Dowell
`
`Decision Tree for Selection of Artificial Lift Method
`LR. Heinze, Texas Tech U.; 1E Lea, Amoco Production Co.,“ and H.W. Winkle; Texas Tech U.
`
`Integrated Sequence Stratigraphic and Reservoir Engineering Approach to Field
`Management Process: East Fault Block, Hawkins Field
`V.D. Rahmanian, Exxon Co. USA; M.R. Chlebana, Imperial Oil Ltd. ; and L.0. Fernandez and
`RH. Davidson, Exxon Co. USA
`
`Page 12 of 20
`a
`Page 12 of 20
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIXA
`
`
`
`Society of Petrolauni Enghaers
`
`SINGLE-TRIP COMPLETION CONCEPT REPLACES MULTIPLE PACKERS
`AND SLIDING SLEEVES IN SELECTIVE MULTI-ZONE PRODUCTION AND
`STIMULATION OPERATIONS
`
`_. Robert Coon, SPE, Baker Oil Tools; Doug Murray, Baker Oil Tools
`
`Copyright 1995. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Inc.
`
`This paper was prepared Ior presentation at the Production Operations Symposium hold in Oklahoma City, OK. U.S.A., 2—4 April 1995.
`
`I AesraAcr
`
`In conventional multi-zone completion operations, selective
`production andfor stimulation requirements are accomplished
`by opening and closing sliding sleeves in each producing
`' zone. This completion method requires at least one trip per
`zone as well as substantial amounts of equipment in the well.
`' An alternative method that is being field tested will move the
`internal control of the well from the tubing string to the cas-
`ing. This eliminates equipment from inside the well and re-
`duces the number of trips required from one per zone to a
`Single trip for the entire well. This paper describes the single-
`trip completion concept, primarily for horizontal wells, as well
`as the new technology that has been developed to support
`it.
`
`CURRENT HORIZONTAL COMPLETION OPTIONS
`
`For horizontal wells, completion technology has historically
`lagged behind drilling innovations.
`In the past couple of years,
`hOWever. completion options for horizontal wells have in-
`creased and new range from the simplest open-hole method
`'mam
`References at end of paper
`
`to cemented and perforated casing completions. The more
`complicated completions put heavy emphasis on zonal iso-
`lation, and attempt to reduce cost at the same time. Current
`options are outlined below. Each has its own set of merits
`and limitations.
`
`OPEN HOLE
`
`Open hole is the simplest form of horizontal completion. As
`its name implies, the horizontal section of the well is left open.
`This technique is very inexpensive and is well suited for stable
`formations where very little if any zonal isolation is needed.
`The most common application for open—hole completions is
`in fractured limestone or chalk formations. One major ad
`vantage, other than the cost itself, is that the formation has
`little damage from the completion because of the absence
`of cement. On the other hand, the absence of casing se-
`verely limits the operator’s remedial options and all but elimi-
`nates the ability to perform zonal isolation. The only option
`available for these operations is to use inflatable packers to
`shut off part of the well for remediation and limited zonal
`isolation.
`
`Page 13 of 20
`Page 13 of 20
`
`
`911
`
`

`

`
`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIXA
`
`
`
`2
`
`SINGLE-TRIP COMPLETION CONCEPTS HEPLACES MULTIPLE PACKERS AND SLIDING SLEEVES
`
`SPE 29539
`
`SP!
`
`SIDNEI SIEEVE
`
`
`
`
`
`the
`vidt
`frac
`of
`
`tan
`bac
`
`Fig.1
`
`SLQTI'ED LINER
`
`The only difference between open-hole and slotted liner
`completions is the addition of a slotted liner in the horizontal
`section of the well. The slotted liner provides the well with
`the added stability necessary for some formations without
`adding substantial cost or complexity over the open-hole
`completion. The added stability maintains the integrity of
`the well and helps prevent cave~ins from stopping or severely
`restricting production. This becomes increasingly important
`as the formation pressure decreases from production.
`
`A slotted liner is not very effective for sand exclusion, and is
`susceptible to plugging. Therefore, a sand screen is some-
`times used in place of the slotted liner to centrol the sand
`infiltration. The chief drawback of the slotted liner comple-
`tion is that it removes any possibility of remedial or zonal
`isolation. The need to isolate zones becomes more appar-
`ent as the well matures and begins to water cone or be-
`comes depleted from existing fractures.
`
`in this type of completion, sliding sleeves can be opened
`and closed using coiled tubing shifting tools. These tools
`are normally hydraulically activated so the shifting of the
`sleeves is very easy and selective. The use of the sliding
`sleeves also gives the operator the option of acid or low.
`volume sand fracturing. The fracturing effectively increases
`the life of the well by increasing the payout.
`
`The ECP sliding sleeve completion has some drawbacks,
`For example, the formation, if not stable, can collapse on the
`tubing and shut off access to the sliding sleeve.
`If the forma.
`tion collapses then it could possibly choke off production from -
`that zone. Additionally, effective isolation between fon'na~
`tions is limited by ECP length (up to 40 ft), so extremely po-
`rous formations (i.e. sandstone) can fiow around the ECP
`and cancel any zonal isolation the operator engineered into
`the completion. On the other hand. ECPs set in imperme—
`able shale work well as a barrier. The hole size is also an
`important consideration. Setting ECPs in a washout can
`result in failures. These wellbores also increase with