throbber
Paper 80
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY, LLC
`and
`BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, LLC,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`PACKERS PLUS ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`______________
`
`Case IPR2016-005961
`Patent 7,134,505
`______________
`
`
`JOINT LIST OF DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT OBJECTIONS2
`
`
`
`1 This paper addresses RC’s demonstratives for IPR2016-00596 and -01496.
`2 Filed pursuant to Paper 76.
`
`36883429.1
`
`

`

`
`
`The Parties file this listing of Petitioners’ unresolved objections:
`
`Rapid Completions’ Slides 4-6, 9, 11-14, 40-45, 54-56, 58, 73, 75, 86, 92,
`
`97, 100, 103, 108-109, 112, 114-116, 118, and 120
`
`Petitioners’ short statement: The images of witnesses are not in evidence, are
`
`irrelevant, and run the risk of eliciting unconscious or implicit biases3 that should
`
`not be permitted to influence the evaluation or weighting of testimony.
`
`RC’s short statement: Respondent’s counsel has been involved in various trials,
`
`hearings, and IPR proceedings where pictures are used in this way without this
`
`being a problem or even objectionable in the first place.
`
`Rapid Completions’ Slide 13
`
`Petitioners’ short statement: The quoted snippets misleadingly omit the highly-
`
`relevant intervening testimony at 124:1-16 in Ex. 2085 (IPR2016-01506).
`
`RC’s short statement: Respondent is not attempting to be misleading; Petitioners
`
`are free to present clarifying testimony in their rebuttal presentation. Fed. R. Evid.
`
`106.
`
`
`3 Petitioners in no way suggest the Board is improperly or uniquely biased; rather,
`studies show that humans by nature have involuntary emotional responses when
`viewing images of faces with different expressions and/or skin tones. See, e.g.,
`o https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/new-study-exposes-
`racial-preferences-americans-n413371;
`o https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158748/;
`o https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-00502-3;
`o https://www.nature.com/articles/srep08478.
`36883429.1
`
`1
`
`

`

`October 31, 2017
`
`
`
`/Mark T. Garrett/
`Mark T. Garrett
`Lead Counsel for Petitioners
`
`/Justin T. Nemunaitis/
`Justin T. Nemunaitis
`Backup Counsel for Rapid Completions LLC
`
`36883429.1
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on October 31,
`
`2017, a complete copy of JOINT LIST OF DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT
`
`OBJECTIONS was served on Patent Owner’s Exclusive Licensee via email (by
`
`consent), as follows:
`
`hhamad@caldwellcc.com
`bcaldwell@caldwellcc.com
`jnemunaitis@caldwellcc.com
`gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com
`rapid@caldwellcc.com
`
`
`
`/Mark T. Garrett/
`Mark T. Garrett (Reg. No. 44,699)
`
`36883429.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket