throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED
`WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL,
`and BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD
`LLC; WEATHERFORD/LAMB, INC.;
`OPERATIONS LLC
`WEATHERFORD US, LP; and
`Petitioners
`WEATHERFORD ARTIFICIAL LIFT
`
`SYSTEMS, LLC
`
`Petitioners
`
`
`v.
`v.
`
`
`PACKERS PLUS ENERGY
`PACKERS PLUS ENERGY
`SERVICES INC.,
`SERVICES INC.,
`Patent Owner
`Patent Owner
`
`___________________
`
`Case IPR2016-00596 (Patent 7,134,505)
`Case IPR2016-00597 (Patent 7,543,634)
`Case IPR2016-00598 (Patent 7,861,774)
`Case IPR2016-01380 (Patent 9,303,501)
`Case IPR2016-01496 (Patent 7,134,505)
`Case IPR2016-01505 (Patent 7,543,634)
`Case IPR2016-01506 (Patent 7,861,774)
`Case IPR2016-01509 (Patent 7,861,774)
`Case IPR2016-01514 (Patent 7,543,634)
`Case IPR2016-01517 (Patent 7,134,505)
`___________________
`
`
`
`
`
`EXCLUSIVE LICENSEE RAPID COMPLETIONS LLC’S REQUEST FOR
`ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Exclusive Licensee, Rapid Completions LLC, by and through its attorneys,
`
`respectfully requests oral argument, currently scheduled for November 2, 2017.
`
`If the Board determines that live testimony from the parties’ declarants will
`
`assist the Board, Rapid Completions requests that the oral argument be structured
`
`as follows:
`
`• Each side (Weatherford and Baker Hughes are considered a single
`
`“side”) is permitted ten minutes to make an opening statement.
`
`• Each side is permitted 2-3 hours to divide up as it sees fit between
`
`direct, cross, and redirect, etc. of the experts concerning the issues
`
`raised in their respective declarations.
`
`• Each side is permitted one hour of oral argument time to address the
`
`issues raised in IPR2016-00596, IPR2016-00597, IPR2016-00598,
`
`IPR2016-01380, IPR2016-01496, IPR2016-01505 and IPR2016-
`
`01506, IPR2016-01509, IPR2016-01514 and IPR2016-01517.
`
`If the Board determines that live testimony from the parties’ declarants is not
`
`necessary, Rapid Completions requests that the oral argument be structured as
`
`follows:
`
`• Each side (Weatherford and Baker Hughes are considered a single
`
`“side”) is permitted twenty-five minutes to address issues, evidence,
`
`and testimony relevant to the proceedings as a whole in an opening
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`statement.
`
`
`
`• Each side is permitted one hour and fifteen minutes of oral argument
`
`time to address the issues raised in IPR2016-00596, IPR2016-00597,
`
`IPR2016-00598, IPR2016-01380, IPR2016-01496, IPR2016-01505
`
`and IPR2016-01506, IPR2016-01509, IPR2016-01514 and IPR2016-
`
`01517.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, and without intending to waive any issue not
`
`specifically identified, Rapid Completions specifies the following issues to be
`
`argued:
`
`1.
`
`Petitioners failed to meet their burden of proving that the instituted
`
`claims are unpatentable under any grounds in the Petition;
`
`Any issues identified in Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument;
`
`Any other issues the Board deems necessary for issuing a final written
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`decision.
`
`Rapid Completions requests that the Board provide audio-visual equipment
`
`to display demonstrative exhibits, including a projector to be connected to a laptop
`
`and a screen for displaying documents.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 28, 2017
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Rapid Completions LLC
`
`
`By /Justin T. Nemunaitis/
`Hamad M. Hamad, Reg. No. 64,641
`Bradley W. Caldwell (pro hac vice)
`Justin T. Nemunaitis (pro hac vice)
`CALDWELL CASSADY CURRY, P.C.
`2101 Cedar Springs Road, Suite 1000
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: 214.888.4848
`Facsimile: 214.888.4849
`hhamad@caldwellcc.com
`bcaldwell@caldwellcc.com
`jnemunaitis@caldwellcc.com
`rapid@caldwellcc.com
`
`Dr. Gregory Gonsalves, Reg. No. 43,639
`GONSALVES LAW FIRM
`2216 Beacon Lane
`Falls Church, Virginia 22043
`Telephone: 571.419.7252
`gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6 (e)(4)
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was
`
`served electronically via e-mail in its entirety on the following counsel of record for
`
`Petitioner:
`
`
`
`Mark T. Garrett (Lead Counsel)
`Eagle H. Robinson (Back-up Counsel)
`NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
`mark.garrett@nortonrosefulbright.com
`eagle.robinson@nortonrosefulbright.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Jason Shapiro (Lead Counsel)
`Patrick Finnan (Back-up Counsel)
`EDELL,SHAPIRO & FINNAN, LLC
`js@usiplaw.com
`pjf@usiplaw.com
`epatent@usiplaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 28, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Hamad M. Hamad/
`
`Hamad M. Hamad, Reg. No. 64,641
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket