throbber
Communication Engineering
`
`W. L. EVERITT, Ph.D.
`
`Dean, College of Engineering
`University of Illinois
`
`G. E. ANNER, M.S. in Eng.
`
`Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering
`University of Illinois
`
`Tnmn Enrnon
`
`MCGRAW-HILL BOOK COMPANY, iNC.
`
`New York
`
`Toronto
`
`London
`
`1956
`
`Exhii 1 HH
`
`AMX
`Exhibit 1032-00001
`
`

`
`COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
`
`Copyright © 1956 by tho Moflnw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
`
`Copyright, men, 1937, by the Mofluw-Hill Book Company, Inc.‘ Printed in
`t.heUnitod8tnzuofAmm-ion. Allrighunnarvod.
`'l'hisbook,ox-park
`thereof, mny not be reproduced in anyform without punnhinn oi the publhhon.
`
`Libmry ojccmgnu Catalog Can! Numbcr 55-12099
`n
`.
`
`‘III HAP!-I PIE! COKPANY. YORK, PA.
`
`~ I
`
`1.3,-vw
`"4"-ta.g.ains...._-....:';—,
`
`.
`
`AMX
`
`Exhii 1 III!
`
`AMX
`Exhibit 1032-00002
`
`

`
`1.
`
`cornivurcamox nnarxaarunc
`V
`i
`"A
`5-313. Phantom Circuits. =Any means by which the number
`
`tends to reduce the relative cost of outside plant, a major ch
`longudistance transmission. An extremely simple method by
`can be done is the use of “phantom” circuits. A phantom circuit gives
`an additional telephone channel for each four wires, thereby increasing
`the carrying capacity 50, per cent.
`It works on a balancing principle
`similar to that of a bridge circuit. The terminal equipment required is
`very simple, consisting only of a pair of repeating coils (or transformers)
`at each end of the phantom. The connection is shown in Fig. 5-11.
`
`1
`
`9
`
`’_',’
`
`q_._.j
`
`' Fro. 5-ll. Phantom telephone circuits.
`
`The standard two-wire circuits are usually called “physical,” or “side,”
`circuits. The terminals of both physicals and phantoms are brought in
`to:-Jackson"-t_ke.long-distance board, so that the operator does not need to
`met It -‘phantom circuit any diflerently from a physical.
`By the principle‘ of' superposition the signals may be considered one at
`a time. T A-voltage impressed on the phantom circuit at the west end of
`Fig. 6-11 will cause a current to enter at the mid-tap of the secondary
`winding of each repeating coil.
`If the impedances of the two line wires
`of the physicals are equal to each other, the current will divide equally
`and so produce mmfs which cancel each other in each repeating coil.
`The currents due to the signal impressed on the phantom terminals will
`flow in the same direction in the two wires of physical 1 and in the oppo-
`site direction in the two wires of physical 2. At the far end the two
`currents will again produce equal and opposing mmfs in the repeating _
`coils, so that no flux will be produced. This absence of flux, due to the .
`-
`currents resulting from the phantom signal, prevents this signal from
`being transferred to the substations connected to the physicals.
`It also
`means that the effective inductance of the repeating coils is negligible
`for ‘phantom currents. Three conversations, one on each physical and
`one on the phantom, can therefore be carried on simultaneously without
`interference.
`The directions of the currents at some instant due to the several sig-
`0
`nalsare shown by the arrows in Fig. 5-11.
`
`AMX
`Exhibit 1032-00003
`
`

`
`names NETWORKS
`
`205
`
`In order to make sure that the mrnfs completely cancel each other, the
`leakage flux must be made negligible. This is accomplished by winding
`the two halves of the secondary winding with wires which are adjacent
`to each other, as illustrated in Fig. 5-12. Toroidal cores are also used to
`reduce leakage flux.
`It is extremely important that the impedances of the two sides of each
`physical line be made as nearly identical as possible.
`If this is not done,
`the phantom currents in the two sides will not be identical and so a mmf
`will be set up in the repeating coils. This
`will result in “cross talk,” or interference
`between the unbalanced physical and the
`phantom.
`If both physicals should be un-
`balanced, the phantom would provide a path
`so that cross talk could also occur between
`
`the
`in
`
`F[(]_ 5.12_ Windingg of
`the two physicals, as well as between each
`"°P°“inS P0“!
`‘W “B9
`physical and the phantom.
`phmmm wcum‘
`The transmission on the phantom is actu-
`ally better than on the physicals. Since the phantom uses two wires in
`parallel for each conductor, the line impedance is cut in half.
`In order to prevent the currents flowing in one pair of wires in a cable
`from inducing a voltage in another pair, the pairs are twisted contin-
`\ uously along their length. On open-wire lines the two wires are trans-
`posed at regular intervals for the same purpose.
`When two pairs are phantomed, each
`’‘ pair individually must also be treated as
`‘
`Z
`a single conductor and the two pairs
`twisted with each other in a cable or trans-
`posed with each other on an open-wire line.
`Cables in which this is done are called
`“quadded ” cables. Owing to the greater
`effective separation of the sides of a phantom circuit, its susceptibility to
`inductive interference is greater.
`5-14. Telephone Repeaters. One of the most important applications
`of a bridge balance is in the two-way repeater on telephone lines. As
`the length of a telephone circuit is increased, the line losses will reach a
`limit at which the transmission will no longer be commercially feasible.
`Beyond this point it is necessary to introduce amplification to make up
`" for the line losses. The transmission of a telephone circuit should be the
`~ same in both directions. Therefore the amplifier must operate in both
`‘ directions. The first idea which would occur to the experimenter is to
`connect two amplifiers side by side as shown in Fig. 5-13, one to operate
`in one direction and the second to amplify in the opposite direction. The
`circuit of Fig. 5-13 would not work, because it would oscillate, or “sing.’f
`up
`
`FIG- 5-13» TWO-Way telephone
`repeater which will not operate
`because of ,,singing_,,
`
`v
`
`’
`
`AMX
`Exhibit 1032-00004
`
`

`
`THE mrmrra LINE
`
`297
`
`Inasmuch as the outer conductor of the flexible coaxial cable is not a
`'; solid, continuous conducting sheet, the electric and magnetic fields may
`i not be confined to the region surrounded by the outer braid and leakage
`‘jfields may be present outside the cable, particularly at uhf and above.
`— }'This condition results from the incomplete shielding by the outer conduc-
`tor and may be minimized by adding a second grounded shield braid
`outside the cable. This results in a so-called “shielded coaxial cable.”
`’ The common telephone cable consists of a number of wire pairs,
`insulated -with paper and twisted together. The several pairs are also
`twisted over the entire cable length to minimisecross talk that results
`3 from magnetic and capacitive coupling between adjacent pairs. The -
`., whole group of pairs is surrounded by a protective outer coating of lead
`‘or of corrugated aluminum covered with plastic. The telephone cable
`9' and other common transmission-line types are illustrated in Fig. 8-3.
`8-8. Calculation of Line Parameters. While the concepts of the per
`‘ ‘unit length line parameters R, L, G, and C’, were developed for the parallel-
`-; wire line, they are by no means peculiar to that configuration. All trans-
`érnission lines exhibit all four of the line parameters to some extent, though
`in certain cases one or two of them may be of negligible magnitude.
`. This is notably demonstrated by the common telephone cable. Since each
`gwire pair is twisted and currents flow in opposite directions in the two
`,conductors comprising the pair, the flux linkages are so small that the
`"inductance per unit length, L, may be neglected in a number of calcula-
`Ktions. Furthermore, the paper serves as an excellent insulator so that
`G, the shunt conductance, is of neglible magnitude. The effect of neg-
`V_ lecting L and G in calculations for’ the telephone cable will be illustrated
`1 later in the chapter.
`‘I Cable and transmission-line manufacturers publish tables giving the
`Jour line parameters of their products. Typical values are listed in
`able 8-1. For simple line configurations, such as those of the parallel-
`e or coaxial type, R, L, and C may be calculated from a knowledge of
`the line geometry and the properties of the materials from which they are
`-n - e. The necessary equations may be derived by direct application
`field theory. They will not be derived‘ here but are summarized in
`~._ able 8-2.
`V 8-4. The Infinite Line, Z.. Since the equivalent circuit of a length
`As: of a transmission line and the means of evaluating its components
`' ‘, L, G, and C have been covered in previous sections, it is now possible
`; I predict the behavior of a line when electrical signals are applied to it.
`9Using the equivalent~circuit idea, let the line be considered as being made
`‘-up of a large number of incremental lengths, A1. Each such length of
`"line then exhibits series loop inductance L Ax, series loop resistance R Ax,
`V
`‘ See, for example, E. C. Jordan, " Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems];
`an
`{Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York, 1950.
`
`'
`
`AMX
`Exhibit 1032-00005
`
`

`
`AMX
`Exhibit 1032-00006
`
`

`
`-
`
`-rnn mrmrrn: mm
`
`299
`
`matter of convenience these elements may be arrangedin a sym-
`ncal T configuration so -that the entire line may be considered as the
`ting case as A9: —+ 0 of a" number of symmetrical T aectiomin cascade,
`T having the elements defined by Eqs. (8-3) and (8-4). On this
`. the results of Chap. 6 may be used to calculate the variation of
`Tau: 8-1‘
`
`_
`Gauze. Spacing.
`in.
`mils
`
`Loop constantblmile .
`'
`‘
`am ‘G,pmhos
`
`12,o1um‘L,mh|
`Open-wire lines
`
`. ..
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. .
`T n-wire .
`n-wire phantom . .
`-wire .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`-wire . . . .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`-wire phantom. .
`n-wire . . .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. .
`
`104
`104
`104
`165
`165
`165
`
`12
`12
`18
`12
`12
`18
`
`I-1‘I-I3“.‘°!".°.°'.°5833585
`
`Paper.-insulated
`
`ii
`
`191’
`161
`. . .
`191’
`.\_.l
`161
`or coaxial cable, dz - 0.375 in., d; - 0.1004 in.
`From Amer. Tel. and Tel. Co.
`A.W.G.
`
`.‘~’.3.,I‘~‘~..3'*O0!-‘G
`
`y-state current and voltage along a uniform line, provided that it is
`an inated in Z.,. Expressions will first be derived for 7 and Z. in terms
`.—'the line constants. Then equations will be derived for voltage and
`' ent as a function of distance along the line.
`.
`'
`v-5. Characteristic Impedance. Corresponding to Z; of
`the sym-
`cal lumped iterative structure, one has Z An: for the line and, corre-
`
`fz
`
`ZY(A:c)"Ai
`
`Z_ R+jwL
`" Tic-:5‘
`
`AMX
`Exhibit 1032-00007
`
`

`
`Tun 8-2. Lnu Pixuiirne Ion Pn.n.x.Ix.-wnl Lnn um.
`CoA:nu.,Cnu
`‘
`
`Pnnllel-wire line:
`
`'

`
`‘
`
`L -
`
`‘
`
`V
`
`'
`
`é,—o'
`-
`$°ui:°i
`’ conductor:
`
`+
`
`?In;
`henrye/In
`sauaé
`ux
`n duolinknguh
`outside
`conductor:
`
`-
`
`,'
`i
`
`0 - % {nude/m
`smooch;
`{undo/m
`
`for 0 > 57
`
`where u - dielectric permittivity
`-I up
`a. - 10"‘/36: mks
`p. - conductor permeability
`' (II:-)dIo
`yu - dielectric permeability
`- (Mano
`no - 4»: X lo" mks
`0 - conductivity of conductor:
`
`8-0. Complex Propagation Constant. The complex propagation ~.--‘
`stent 1., for the equivalent section of length As may be obtained V
`similar manner. Applying Eq. (6-6) to the element of line of l" '
`As; one has
`-
`
`'
`
`_z./2+z.+z._ 5
`A)
`""' “'“——z.
`“"2z.'* z. “w.
`
`AMX
`
`Exhii1HH:
`
`AMX
`Exhibit 1032-00008

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket