throbber
Chapter 4
`
`Detailed accounts of thermoplastic resins
`
`BOREALIS EXHIBIT 1064
`
`Page 1 of 498
`
`

`
`Thermoplastics and Thermoplastic Composites
`
`For easier reading, certain elements of earlier chapters are repeated in the opening remarks
`on each material family and in the sections on ‘Applications’. However, for the latter, the
`reader should refer to Chapter 2 for the most complete and up-to-date information.
`Unless otherwise specified, the units used in the property tables at the end of each account are:
`
`Specific mass or density
`Shrinkage
`Absorption of water
`Tensile strength
`Elongation at break
`Tensile modulus
`Flexural strength
`Flexural modulus
`Compression strength
`Notched impact strength ASTM D256
`HDT B (0.46 MPa)
`HDT A (1.8 MPa)
`Continuous use temperature (unstressed)
`Glass transition temperature
`Brittle point
`Thermal conductivity
`Specific heat
`Coefficient of thermal expansion
`Volume resistivity
`Loss factor
`Dielectric strength
`Arc resistance
`
`g/cm3
`%
`% after 24 h of immersion
`MPa
`%
`GPa
`MPa
`GPa
`MPa
`J/m
`°C
`°C
`°C
`°C
`°C
`W/m.K
`cal/g/°C [1 cal ⫽ 4.19 J]
`10⫺5/°C
`ohm.cm
`10⫺4
`kV/mm
`s
`
`The data are examples that cannot be generalized and cannot be used for design purposes.
`
`4.1 Polyethylene or polythene (PE)
`Albeit having a simple chemical formula, —(CH2—CH2)n—, polyethylene is a broad family
`with versatile properties that depend on which of the three main polymerization processes
`is used:
`• Free radical vinyl polymerization, the oldest process, leads to branched low density
`polyethylene (LDPE). Macromolecules have numerous short branches, which reduce
`the melting point, tensile strength and crystallinity. Polymers are relatively flexible
`because of the high volume of the branched molecule and the low crystallinity.
`• Ziegler-Natta polymerization leads to linear unbranched polyethylene, the so-called
`high density polyethylene (HDPE), which is denser, tougher and more crystalline. By
`copolymerization with other alkenes it is possible to obtain linear low density polyethyl-
`ene (LLDPE) with better mechanical properties than LDPE. Blends of LLDPE and
`LDPE are used to combine the good final mechanical properties of LLDPE and the
`strength of LDPE in the molten state.
`• Metallocene catalysis polymerization is the most recent technique, growing fast to pro-
`duce a consistent, uniform distribution of molecular weight resulting in enhanced tough-
`ness, impact and puncture strengths, better cold behaviour and optical properties.
`These advantages allow the downgauging or enhancement of performances for the
`same weight of polymer. Metallocene catalysis allows the production of all densities,
`from ultra-low density to ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenes (UHMWPE).
`
`218
`
`Page 2 of 498
`
`

`
`Detailed accounts of thermoplastic resins
`
`In addition to their structural diversity, polyethylenes can be crosslinked.
`Polyethylenes can be classified versus density and molecular weight:
`• ultra-low and very low density, ULDPE and VLDPE
`• low density, LDPE and LLDPE
`• medium density, MDPE
`• high density, HDPE
`• high molecular weight, HMWPE
`• ultra-high molecular weight, UHMWPE.
`Regardless of molecular weight, polyethylene can be classified into five density categories:
`• 0.890 to 0.909 or 0.915
`• 0.910 to 0.925
`• 0.926 to 0.940
`• 0.941 to 0.959
`• 0.960 and higher.
`Regardless of density, polyethylenes have molecular weights of the order of:
`• LDPE & HDPE: from a few thousands to 300 000 depending on the end use
`• high molecular weight, HMWPE: approximately 200 000 to 500 000
`• ultra-high molecular weight, UHMWPE: approximately 3 000 000 and higher.
`Considering the versatility of polyethylenes, each polyethylene subfamily has, of course,
`its favoured application sectors:
`• HDPE is used for 86% of all polyethylene goods having applications that are struc-
`tural to a greater or lesser degree
`• LDPE and LLDPE are used for 86% of all polyethylene films.
`Expressed in another way:
`• 75% of HDPE is converted into parts having a structural function to a greater or lesser
`degree
`• 75% to 80% of LDPE and LLDPE are converted into films.
`For films, Table 4.1 proposes an arbitrary classification of the polyethylene subfamilies
`(where m indicates metallocene catalysis).
`
`Table 4.1 Films: arbitrary classification of the polyethylene subfamilies
`
`Function
`
`Mechanical
`
`Optical
`
`Organo-leptic
`
`Vapour barrier
`
`Sealability
`
`Processability
`
`mVLDPE
`mLLDPE
`LLDPE
`LDPE
`HDPE
`
`1
`1
`2
`3
`3
`
`1
`2
`2
`2
`3
`
`1
`1
`2
`1
`2
`
`1 – generally the best adapted to the function
`2 – intermediate behaviour
`3 – generally less adapted to the function
`
`2
`2
`2
`2
`1
`
`1
`2
`2
`2
`3
`
`3
`3
`3
`1
`2
`
`The same basic monomer generates a lot of common properties and, unless otherwise speci-
`fied, we will not make a distinction between the various subfamilies. Only the foams will be
`given special attention as they present particular properties due to their morphology:
`• decreased mechanical properties due to the low quantity of polymer and the high pro-
`portion of gas
`• weaker chemical resistance due to the highly divided state of the polymer.The thin cell
`walls immediately absorb liquids and gases.
`
`219
`
`Page 3 of 498
`
`

`
`Thermoplastics and Thermoplastic Composites
`
`4.1.1 General properties
`Advantages
`General advantages are low price, attractive price/property ratios, easy transformation,
`chemical inertness, impact resistance, low absorption of water, low density (HDPE included),
`good electrical insulator, low coefficient of friction, suitability for food contact, ease of
`welding, good machinability for rigid grades; good resistance against high-energy radiation,
`physiological inertness, versatility of processing methods except for UHMWPE.
`• LDPE: good mechanical properties, flexibility, impact resistance at ambient tempera-
`ture; good insulating material even in a wet medium; chemically inert.
`• HDPE: same properties as LDPE but more rigid; better thermal and creep behaviour;
`lower coefficient of friction and higher pressure strength, allowing antifriction applica-
`tions with higher PV (pressure*velocity) factor; more transparent.
`• UHMWPE: better mechanical properties, lower coefficient of friction and higher pres-
`sure strength allowing antifriction applications with higher PV factor.
`• Linear PE: same properties as the equivalent branched PE with an improvement in the
`mechanical properties, thermal and creep behaviour, and resistance to stress cracking.
`• Metallocene: enhanced toughness, impact and puncture strengths, better cold behav-
`iour and optical properties.
`• Crosslinked PE: more resistant to temperature, creep and cracking.
`
`Drawbacks
`General drawbacks are the innate sensitivity to heat, UV, light and weathering (but stabil-
`ized grades are marketed), stress cracking, and creep; low rigidity, significant shrinkage, lim-
`ited transparency. Due to the surface tension, gluing, painting and printing are difficult
`without surface treatments. Composed only of carbon and hydrogen, polyethylenes are nat-
`urally flammable but FR grades are marketed.
`Processing is difficult for UHMWPE due to the high molecular weight.
`Polyethylene is sensitive to pro-oxidant metals such as copper, manganese or cobalt,
`which must be avoided as inserts.
`
`Special grades
`They can be classified according to the type of processing, specific properties, targeted
`applications:
`• Extrusion, injection, compression, blown film, blow moulding, rotational moulding,
`foam, coating, powdering, co-extrusion, for thin or thick parts, for crosslinking, electro-
`welding . . .
`• Stabilized against heat, UV, light or weathering; antistatic, conductive, reinforced, food
`contact, physiologically inert, fireproofed, transparent, resistant to stress cracking, low
`warpage, high fluidity . . .
`• For films, sheets, tubes, wire and cable coatings, fibres, mass production of household
`requisites, bottle racks, bins, containers, pallets, tubes, prostheses, antifriction parts . . .
`
`Costs
`The costs, as for all plastics, fluctuate greatly with the crude oil price, and are only given to
`provide a rough idea. They are generally of the order of €1 per kilogram.
`
`220
`
`Page 4 of 498
`
`

`
`Detailed accounts of thermoplastic resins
`
`Processing
`All molten-state processing methods are usable: extrusion, injection, compression, blown
`film, blow moulding, rotational moulding, thermoforming, foam, coating, powdering,
`co-extrusion, fluidized bed, machining for high hardness grades, welding. Special grades can
`be crosslinked after shaping.
`
`Applications
`(See Chapter 2 for further information.)
`Although varying according to country, consumption is approximately divided into:
`• 40–45% HDPE
`• 30–35% LLDPE
`• 20–25% LDPE.
`Applications vary according to the polyethylene type.
`LDPE and LLDPE are mainly used for:
`• films for packaging: food, non-food, shrink, stretch . . .
`• films for other applications
`• sheets
`• extrusion coating
`• injection moulding
`• blow moulding
`• pipes and conduits.
`HDPE is mainly used for:
`• blow moulding of:
`䊊 household chemical bottles
`industrial drums
`liquid food bottles
`䊊 drugs, cosmetics and toiletries
`• injection moulding of:
`crates and totes
`food and beverage containers
`䊊 housewares
`industrial and shipping pails
`• films for food packaging and retail bags
`• sheets
`• pipes and conduits
`• rotomoulding.
`Among other applications, let us quote, for example:
`• films for agricultural, industrial or general-purpose uses
`• fuel tanks for the automotive industry
`• moulded basins, bottles, stoppers, toys, hollow parts, small electric equipment, pallets,
`street furniture, seats
`• large-sized objects: cisterns, tanks, septic tanks, hulls of boats, canoes, buoys, sailboards,
`barrels, drums . . .
`• gas, water or sewer pipes, sheaths
`• crosslinked foams, extruded and moulded parts
`• UHMWPE: gears, bearings, antifriction parts for light loads, prostheses
`
`䊊
`
`221
`
`䊊
`
`䊊
`
`䊊
`
`䊊
`
`Page 5 of 498
`
`

`
`Thermoplastics and Thermoplastic Composites
`
`• foams: densities from 25 kg/m3 up to 330 kg/m3, semi-rigid to flexible, with insulating
`and damping properties for packaging, building insulation, panels and sandwich struc-
`tures, multi-layer composites for damping (helmets, for example).
`
`4.1.2 Thermal behaviour
`The continuous use temperatures in an unstressed state are generally estimated from 90°C
`for LDPE up to 110–120°C for HDPE and 130°C for crosslinked polyethylenes if the soft-
`ening or melting temperatures are higher. For example, the sealing temperature of a given
`grade of VLDPE is 83°C.
`Service temperatures are lower under loading because of modulus decay, strain, creep,
`relaxation . . . They can be of the order of:
`• 50–90°C for LDPE
`• 50–120°C for HDPE.
`As examples:
`• for a given grade of LDPE, the short-term modulus retention at 80°C is 40% of the
`value at 20°C. For two grades of HDPE (see Figure 4.1), the short-term retention of
`stress at yield is in the range of 35% to 42% at 80°C
`• HDTs under 1.8 MPa are:
`from 30–40°C for LDPE
`to 45–60°C for HDPE.
`
`䊊
`
`䊊
`
`%
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`100
`
`120
`
`140
`
`°C
`Figure 4.1. HDPE examples of stress at yield retention (%) versus temperature (°C)
`
`For long-term heat ageing, property retention depends on the property and grades con-
`sidered, notably the heat stabilizers used. For a heat-sensitive characteristic such as elonga-
`tion at break, the values for a given polyethylene after ageing at 120°C are roughly:
`• 60% after 10 days and 40% after 17 days for a grade without a stabilizer
`• 80–100% after 10 days and 60–90% after 17 days for several grades with various sta-
`bilizers, versus 120–160% initial elongation at break with or without a stabilizer.
`The UL temperature indices of specific grades can be 50°C for electrical and mechanical
`properties including impact.
`At low temperatures, the behaviour can be acceptable down to ⫺60°C or even less, down
`to ⫺110°C according to grades and the mechanical constraints experienced. Figure 4.2 dis-
`plays examples of stress at yield retention for polyethylenes at subzero temperatures.
`Despite a high increase in rigidity UHMWPE can be used down to ⫺269°C.
`
`222
`
`Page 6 of 498
`
`

`
`Detailed accounts of thermoplastic resins
`
`HDPE
`UHMWPE
`
`350
`
`300
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`%
`
`0
`⫺120 ⫺100
`
`⫺80
`
`⫺60
`
`⫺40
`°C
`Figure 4.2. HDPE & UHMWPE examples of stress at yield retention (%) versus sub-zero temperatures (°C)
`
`⫺20
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`The brittle points are generally of the order of ⫺70°C.
`The glass transition temperature of PE by DSC measurements is ⫺110°C. The glass tran-
`sition temperatures by DMTA measurements can be higher, depending on the frequency.
`These results relate to some grades only and cannot be generalized.
`
`4.1.3 Optical properties
`Polyethylenes are whitish and translucent to opaque according to the density and grade.
`The refractive index varies with the density and type of polyethylene, for example:
`• 1.51 for an LDPE
`• 1.52 for an MDPE
`• 1.54 for an HDPE.
`For films, haze can be 5–6% for specific grades.
`These results relate to some grades only and cannot be generalized.
`
`4.1.4 Mechanical properties
`The mechanical properties are generally fair with high elongations at break but much more
`limited strains at yield. Moduli and hardnesses are rather weak and impact strength is high
`to excellent. The abrasion resistance of polyethylene depends on the roughness, type and
`morphology of the antagonist sliding surface. Wear resistance is sufficient for antifriction
`applications under moderate pressure and low PV.
`Some grades can have weaker characteristics.
`Crystallinity and molecular orientation improve the mechanical properties but are harm-
`ful to notched impact resistance.
`
`Friction
`High density and UHMW polyethylenes are used to make antifriction parts. The coeffi-
`cients of friction are low but the moduli, hardnesses and softening temperatures are weak,
`which limits the loads and PV factors.
`
`223
`
`Page 7 of 498
`
`

`
`Thermoplastics and Thermoplastic Composites
`
`Table 4.2 gives some PV examples ranging from 0.04 up to 0.07 MPa.m/s. All these values
`are weak but certain sources quote very different data.
`These results relate to a few grades only and cannot be generalized.
`
`Table 4.2 UHMWPE: examples of tribological properties
`
`PV (MPa.m/s)
`
`Pressure, P (MPa)
`
`Velocity, V (m/s)
`
`Coefficient of friction
`
`0.07
`0.07
`0.07
`0.07
`0.06
`0.05
`0.04
`
`0.9
`0.7
`0.23
`0.14
`0.08
`0.05
`0.025
`
`0.08
`0.1
`0.3
`0.5
`0.8
`1
`1.7
`
`0.1–0.2
`0.1–0.2
`0.1–0.2
`0.2–0.3
`0.2–0.3
`0.2–0.3
`⬎0.2
`
`Dimensional stability
`Shrinkage, coefficient of thermal expansion, crystallinity and creep are rather high, but
`alterations through moisture exposure are slight.
`
`Poisson’s ratio
`Poisson’s ratio depends on numerous parameters concerning the grade used and its pro-
`cessing, the temperature, the possible reinforcements, the direction of testing with regard to
`the molecular or reinforcement orientation. For a given HDPE sample it is evaluated at
`0.46, but this is an example only that cannot be generalized.
`
`Creep
`Neat thermoplastic polyethylenes have low moduli that involve high strains for moderate
`loading. Consequently, creep moduli are also low, the more so as the temperature rises, as
`we can see in Figures 4.3 ((a) and (b)) where creep moduli are displayed as a function of
`time, load and temperature.
`In Figure 4.3(a) we can see a broad difference between two grades tested under a light
`load (2–3 MPa). The third grade tested under 8.75 MPa is probably more creep resistant.
`Figure 4.3(b) displays the fast decrease of creep moduli when the temperature rises mod-
`erately. Designers must be vigilant when computing the wall thickness of a part to be used
`at ambient temperatures (40°C) during warm weather.
`Finally, Figure 4.3(c) shows that glass fibre reinforcement is an efficient means to attain
`more suitable creep moduli.
`These results relate to a few grades only and cannot be generalized.
`
`Relaxation
`Figure 4.4 ((a) and (b)) displays the same relaxation data, first against a linear time scale,
`showing the fast drop in stress at the start of test, and second against a logarithmic time
`scale showing a regular decrease of stress.
`These results relate to a few grades only and cannot be generalized.
`
`224
`
`Page 8 of 498
`
`

`
`Detailed accounts of thermoplastic resins
`
`100
`
`h
`
`100
`
`h
`
`2 to 3 MPa
`2 to 3 MPa
`8.75 MPa
`
`23°C
`40°C
`60°C
`80°C
`
`30% GF
`20% GF
`Neat
`
`1
`
`GPa
`
`0
`
`(a)
`
`1
`
`1
`
`GPa
`
`0
`
`(b)
`
`1
`
`012345
`
`GPa
`
`(c)
`
`1
`
`100
`
`h
`(a) HDPE & UHMWPE examples of creep modulus (GPa) versus time (h) for various loading (MPa);
`Figure 4.3.
`(b) HDPE & UHMWPE examples of creep modulus (GPa) versus time (h) for various temperatures (°C); (c) HDPE
`examples of creep modulus (GPa) versus time (h) for various reinforcements
`
`225
`
`Page 9 of 498
`
`

`
`Thermoplastics and Thermoplastic Composites
`
`100
`
`%
`
`50
`
`0
`
`0
`
`(a)
`
`100
`
`%
`
`50
`
`0
`
`1
`
`(b)
`
`500
`h
`
`1000
`
`10
`
`100
`
`1000
`
`h
`
`Figure 4.4. Stress relaxation of HDPE, examples of stress retention (%) versus time (h) under 2% strain at 20°C
`
`4.1.5 Ageing
`Dynamic fatigue
`The dynamic fatigue can be fair or good for certain grades if care is taken to limit the strains
`by restricting the stresses to values in keeping with the low modulus.
`For a given grade of HDPE, Figure 4.5 displays an example of an SN or Wöhler’s curve
`concerning flexural tests with maximum stress of ⫾σ and average stress of 0.
`
`Weathering
`Polyethylene resists hydrolysis well but is naturally sensitive to light and UV. It must be pro-
`tected by addition of anti-UV and other protective agents or by 2–3% of an adequate car-
`bon black. In such cases, after weathering of test bars for several years in various climates,
`the retention of tensile strength is generally good but the elongation at break retention can
`be as low as 10%. These results are examples only and they cannot be generalized.
`
`High-energy radiation
`In the absence of oxygen, polyethylene is crosslinked by exposure to high-energy ionizing
`radiation. The degree of reticulation depends only on the radiation dose. The reticulation
`brings in particular a better resistance to stress cracking but too high a dose involves a
`
`226
`
`Page 10 of 498
`
`

`
`Detailed accounts of thermoplastic resins
`
`50
`
`25
`
`MPa
`
`0
`1.0E⫹05
`
`1.0E⫹06
`N
`Figure 4.5. SN curve of HDPE, examples of maximum stress (MPa) versus number of cycles at rupture (N)
`
`1.0E⫹07
`
`reduction in elongation at break and impact resistance. For a dose greater than 100 kJ/kg
`(10 Mrad), the variations become measurable; 1 MJ/kg reduces elongation at break to a few
`percent of its initial value, but the stress at yield remains practically unchanged.
`In the presence of oxygen, for example in air, there are simultaneous crosslinking and
`degradation reactions.The action of the high-energy radiation depends in a complex way on
`the power, dose and wall thickness of the polyethylene. A short-duration irradiation to a
`strong dose on a broad wall thickness has the same effect as an irradiation in the absence of
`oxygen that does not have sufficient time to diffuse in depth. On the other hand, a long-
`duration irradiation (months or years) to a low dose involves a considerable reduction in
`the impact resistance because oxygen has a long enough time to diffuse in depth. Thus, a
`dose of 10–20 kJ/kg (1–2 mRad) per mm thickness reduces elongation at break to 10% of its
`initial value. These results are examples only and cannot be generalized.
`
`Behaviour at high frequencies
`Polyethylenes have very weak loss factors, about 1–10 ⫻ 10⫺4 and do not heat up under
`high-frequency current. They cannot be welded by this technique.
`
`Chemicals
`Polyethylenes absorb little water and are not very sensitive to it but have some propensity
`to stress cracking in the presence of soaps, alcohols, detergents . . .
`Suitable grades are usable in contact with food and are used for food packaging, milk bottles
`for example.
`Chemical resistance is generally good up to 60°C but polyethylenes are attacked by oxi-
`dizing acids, chlorinated solvents, certain oxidants, aromatic hydrocarbons.
`Copper, manganese and cobalt are oxidation catalysts and must be avoided, in particular
`for inserts.
`Crystallinity increases the impermeability and, consequently, chemical resistance.
`Generally, HDPE is slightly more resistant than LDPE.
`
`227
`
`Page 11 of 498
`
`

`
`Thermoplastics and Thermoplastic Composites
`
`Table 4.3 displays some results concerning general assessments of behaviour after pro-
`longed immersion in a range of chemicals at ambient temperature for given grades, which
`are not necessarily representative of all the polyethylenes. These general indications should
`be verified by consultation with the producer of the selected grades and by tests under
`operating conditions.
`
`Table 4.3 Polyethylene: examples of chemical behaviour at room temperature
`
`Chemical
`
`Concentration Estimated
`(%)
`behaviour
`
`Chemical
`
`Concentration Estimated
`(%)
`behaviour
`
`HDPE LDPE
`
`HDPE LDPE
`
`Acetic acid
`Acetic acid
`Acetic aldehyde
`Acetic anhydride
`Acetone
`Acetonitrile
`Acetophenone
`Acetyl chloride
`Adipic acid
`Allylic alcohol
`Alum
`Aluminium chloride
`Aluminium fluoride
`Aluminium sulfate
`Ammonia gas
`Ammonia liquid
`Ammonium chloride
`Ammonium fluoride
`Ammonium hydroxide
`Ammonium hydroxide
`Ammonium nitrate
`Ammonium sulfate
`Ammonium sulfide
`Amyl acetate
`Amyl alcohol
`Aniline
`Antimony chloride
`Aqua regia
`Aromatic hydrocarbons
`Arsenic acid
`ASTM1 oil
`ASTM2 oil
`ASTM3 oil
`Barium carbonate
`Barium chloride
`Barium hydroxide
`Barium sulfate
`Beer
`Benzaldehyde
`Benzene
`Benzoic acid
`Benzyl chloride
`Benzyl alcohol
`Borax
`
`228
`
`10–60
`⬎96
`100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`Saturated
`96
`Solution
`Solution
`Saturated
`Unknown
`100
`100
`Solution
`Solution
`30
`Dilute
`Unknown
`50
`Solution
`100
`100
`100
`10–90
`Unknown
`100
`Unknown
`100
`100
`100
`Saturated
`Saturated
`Saturated
`Saturated
`Unknown
`100
`100
`Saturated
`100
`100
`Saturated
`
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`l
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`n
`n
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`l
`S
`S
`
`S
`l
`l
`l
`l
`l
`l
`l
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`n
`l
`n
`S
`n
`n
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`n
`S
`l
`S
`S
`
`Boric acid
`Bromine (dry gas)
`Bromine (liquid)
`Bromine water
`Butanol
`Butanone
`Butyl acetate
`Butylamine
`Butylchloride
`Butyric acid
`Butyric acid
`Calcium chloride
`Calcium hydroxide
`Calcium hypochlorite
`Carbon sulfide
`Carbon tetrachloride
`Castor oil
`Cellosolve
`Cellosolve acetate
`Chlorinated hydrocarbons
`Chlorinated solvents
`Chlorine (dry gas)
`Chlorine dioxide
`Chlorine water
`Chloroacetic acid
`Chlorobenzene
`Chlorobenzene mono
`Chloroform
`Chlorosulfonic acid
`Chromic acid
`Citric acid
`Copper sulfate
`Cresol
`Cyclohexane
`Cyclohexanol
`Cyclohexanone
`Decaline
`Dextrin
`Dichloroethane
`Dichloroethylene
`Diethylamine
`Diethyleneglycol
`Diethylether
`Dimethylamine
`
`S
`Unknown
`n
`100
`n
`100
`n
`Solution
`S
`100
`S
`100
`S
`100
`n
`Unknown
`n
`100
`S
`100
`S
`Unknown
`S
`Unknown
`S
`Saturated
`S
`Solution
`l
`100
`l
`100
`S
`100
`n
`100
`n
`100
`n
`100
`n
`100
`l
`100
`l
`Unknown
`l
`Unknown
`l
`Unknown
`l
`100
`l
`100
`n
`100
`n
`Unknown
`S
`Unknown
`10 to saturated S
`Unknown
`S
`100
`S
`100
`S
`100
`S
`100
`S
`100
`S
`Solution
`S
`100
`l
`100
`l to n
`100
`l
`100
`S
`100
`l
`100
`l
`
`S
`n
`n
`n
`S
`l
`l
`l
`n
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`n
`n
`S
`l
`l
`n
`n
`n
`l
`n
`n
`l
`n
`n
`n
`S
`S
`S
`l
`l
`l
`l
`l
`S
`n
`l
`l
`S
`n
`n
`
`Page 12 of 498
`
`

`
`Table 4.3 (Continued)
`
`Chemical
`
`Dimethylformamide
`Dimethylhydrazine
`Dioctylphthalate
`Dioxan
`Ethanol
`Ethanol
`Ethanol
`Ethylacetate
`Ethylchloride
`Ethylene glycol
`Ethylenebromide
`Ethylhexanol
`Fluorine
`Fluosilicic acid
`Formaldehyde
`Formic acid
`Freon 113
`Freon 13b1
`Freon 22
`Freon 32
`Furfural
`Furfuryl alcohol
`Glucose
`Glycerol
`Glycollic acid
`Heptane
`Hexane
`Hydrazine
`Hydrobromic acid
`Hydrochloric acid
`Hydrofluoric acid
`Hydrogen
`Hydrogen peroxide
`Hydrogen sulfide
`Hydrogen sulfide gas
`Iron(III) chloride
`Iron sulfate
`Isobutanol
`Isooctane (Fuel A)
`Isopropanol
`Kerosene
`Lactic acid
`Lead acetate
`Linseed oil
`Liquid paraffin
`Magnesium carbonate
`Magnesium chloride
`Magnesium hydroxide
`Maleic acid
`Manganese sulfate
`Mercury
`
`Detailed accounts of thermoplastic resins
`
`Concentration Estimated
`(%)
`behaviour
`
`Chemical
`
`Concentration Estimated
`(%)
`behaviour
`
`HDPE LDPE
`
`HDPE LDPE
`
`100
`100
`100
`100
`40
`96
`Unknown
`100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`Unknown
`35
`10–100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`Dilute
`100
`33
`100
`100
`100
`48–100
`10–36
`4–60
`100
`30–90
`Unknown
`Unknown
`Unknown
`Saturated
`100
`100
`100
`100
`90
`10
`100
`100
`Saturated
`Unknown
`Unknown
`Saturated
`Unknown
`100
`
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`n
`S
`n
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l to S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`
`l
`S
`l
`l
`S
`l
`S
`l
`l
`S
`l
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`n
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`
`Mercury chloride
`Mercury(II) nitrate
`Methane chloride
`Methanol
`Methylbromide
`Methylchloride
`Methylene chloride
`Methylethylketone
`Methylglycol
`Milk
`Mineral oil
`Molasses
`Monoethanolamine
`Monoethyleneglycol
`Naphtha
`Nickel chloride
`Nickel nitrate
`Nitric acid
`Nitric acid
`Nitric acid
`Nitric acid
`Nitrobenzene
`Nonanol
`Oleic acid
`Oleic acid
`Olive oil
`Oxalic acid
`Ozone
`Pentanol
`Pentylacetate
`Perchloroethylene
`Petrol aliphatic
`Petroleum
`Phenol
`Phenol
`Phosphoric acid
`Picric acid
`Potassium bromate
`Potassium carbonate
`Potassium chlorate
`Potassium chromate
`Potassium cyanide
`Potassium dichromate
`Potassium ferrocyanide
`Potassium fluoride
`Potassium hydroxide
`Potassium hypochlorite
`Potassium nitrate
`Potassium perchlorate
`Potassium permanganate
`Potassium persulfate
`
`Unknown
`Solution
`100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`Unknown
`100
`100
`Unknown
`Unknown
`100
`Unknown
`Unknown
`Saturated
`10–25
`50
`75
`100
`100
`100
`100
`Unknown
`100
`Saturated
`Unknown
`100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`Unknown
`Solution
`50–95
`Solution
`Unknown
`Saturated
`Saturated
`Saturated
`Unknown
`Saturated
`Saturated
`Unknown
`10–45
`Solution
`Saturated
`10
`20
`10
`
`S
`S
`l
`S
`l
`l
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`n
`n
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`
`S
`S
`l
`S
`n
`l
`n
`l
`S
`S
`l
`S
`l
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`l
`l
`n
`l
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`n
`l
`n
`n
`l
`l
`S
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`
`(Continued)
`
`229
`
`Page 13 of 498
`
`

`
`Thermoplastics and Thermoplastic Composites
`
`Table 4.3 (Continued)
`
`Chemical
`
`Concentration Estimated
`(%)
`behaviour
`
`Chemical
`
`Concentration Estimated
`(%)
`behaviour
`
`HDPE LDPE
`
`HDPE LDPE
`
`Solution
`Potassium sulfide
`Unknown
`Potassium sulfate
`100
`Propanol
`100
`Propionic acid
`100
`Propylene oxide
`Unknown
`Pyridine
`Saturated
`Salicylic acid
`100
`Sea water
`100
`Silicone oil
`Saturated
`Silver acetate
`Saturated
`Silver cyanide
`Saturated
`Silver nitrate
`Unknown
`Sodium borate
`10–50
`Sodium carbonate
`Saturated
`Sodium chlorate
`25
`Sodium chloride
`Unknown
`Sodium cyanide
`Saturated
`Sodium fluoride
`10–55
`Sodium hydroxide
`20
`Sodium hypochlorite
`Solution
`Sodium nitrate
`100
`Sulfuric anhydride
`Solution
`Sulfurous acid
`Sulfurous anhydride (gas) Unknown
`Sulfur dioxide (dry)
`100
`Sulfur dioxide (gas)
`Unknown
`Sulfuric acid
`2–70
`Sulfuric acid
`96
`Sulfuric acid
`Fuming
`
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`n
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`n
`
`S: satisfactory; l: limited; n: not satisfactory
`
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`n
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S
`S to l
`n
`
`Tannic acid
`Tartaric acid
`Tetrachloroethane
`Tetrachloroethylene
`Tetrahydrofuran
`Thionyl chloride
`Tin chloride
`Titanium tetrachloride
`Toluene
`Transformer oil
`Trichloroacetic acid
`Trichloroethane
`Trichloroethylene
`Tricresylphosphate
`Triethanolamine
`Triethylamine
`Turpentine oil
`Urea
`Urine
`Vegetable oil
`Vinegar
`Vinyl chloride
`Vinyl acetate
`Water
`White spirit
`Wine
`Xylene
`Yeast
`Zinc chloride
`
`Solution
`Solution
`100
`100
`100
`100
`Unknown
`Unknown
`100
`100
`Unknown
`100
`100
`Unknown
`Unknown
`Unknown
`100
`Solution
`Unknown
`100
`Unknown
`Unknown
`100
`100
`100
`Unknown
`100
`Solution
`Unknown
`
`S
`S
`l
`l
`l
`n
`S
`S
`l
`S
`S
`n
`l
`S
`S
`l
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`n
`S
`S
`l
`S
`l
`S
`S
`
`S
`S
`l
`n
`l
`n
`S
`S
`n
`S
`S
`n
`l
`S
`S
`l
`l
`S
`S
`S
`S
`n
`l
`S
`l
`S
`n
`S
`S
`
`Permeability
`For films, in several series of experiments concerning various thicknesses of various poly-
`mers, permeability coefficients have been calculated for a reference thickness of 40 µm.
`Units differ for the various gases but are comparable for the different polymers tested with
`the same gas. The following data (without units) are only given to provide a general idea
`and cannot be used for designing any parts or goods.
`• Water vapour: polyethylene has a low permeability, evaluated from 0.9 up to 2.5 com-
`pared to the full range of 0.05 up to 400 for all tested plastics.
`• Gases: polyethylene has a rather high permeability, evaluated at:
`air: 750 to 2750 versus a full range of 3 up to 2750 for all tested plastics
`carbon dioxide: 7000 to 25 000 versus a full range of 30 up to 59 000 for all tested
`plastics
`䊊 nitrogen: 500 to 1700 versus a full range of 1 up to 3500 for all tested plastics
`䊊 oxygen: 1900 to 5000 versus a full range of ⬍1 up to 11 000 for all tested plastics
`䊊 hydrogen: 6000 to 20 000 versus a full range of 400 up to 20 000 for all tested plastics.
`
`䊊
`
`䊊
`
`230
`
`Page 14 of 498
`
`

`
`Detailed accounts of thermoplastic resins
`
`Fire resistance
`Fire resistance is naturally weak. Standard grades burn easily generating flames, even after
`the ignition source is removed. Moreover, polyethylene drips while burning.
`Oxygen indices are roughly 17 with a poor UL94 rating.
`Special formulations make it possible to improve this behaviour, sometimes to the detri-
`ment of other properties. UL94 V0 rating can be reached for some FR grades.
`
`4.1.6 Electrical properties
`Polyethylenes are good insulators even in wet environments, with high dielectric resistivities
`and rigidities, and low loss factors. Special grades are marketed for electrical applications
`such as the insulation of wires and cables.
`
`4.1.7 Joining, decoration
`Welding is easy using thermal processes, possible with ultrasound methods but impossible
`with the high-frequency technique.
`Gluing is difficult, needing pre-treatments such as, for example, chemical etching (sulfo-
`chromic acid etching), flame oxidation or hot-air (500°C) treatment, corona discharge,
`plasma or UV treatments. The exposure must be brief and superficial and the original and
`aged properties must be tested.
`All precautions must be taken concerning health and safety according to local laws and
`regulations.
`Polyethylene can generally be decorated after the same pre-treatments by painting, print-
`ing, metallization. Service conditions must be light.
`
`4.1.8 Crosslinked polyethylene
`Specific grades of polyethylene can be cured before use to improve some performances.The
`main processing methods involve:
`• heating to promote chemical reaction of curing agents such as silanes or peroxides
`leading to crosslinking.
`• irradiation to promote direct crosslinking.
`Heating can be achieved by discontinuous processes, such as heated moulds, ovens, or by
`continuous processes such as hot tubes for wire curing or hot tunnels.
`Irradiation can be achieved by discontinuous processes such as the cobalt bomb, which is
`more convenient for thick parts, but slow or continuous processes such as the electron beam
`are more suitable and speedier for thinner parts.
`Crosslinking improves resistance to heat, stress cracking and abrasion, and also reduces
`permanent set after loading, residual monomers and/or oligomers and VOCs (volatile
`organic compounds). Irradiation is a ‘cold’ sterilization process.
`Of course, there are also some drawbacks, notably the overspend for an additional
`processing step and the corresponding investments or subcontracting. Irradiation can also
`damage polyethylene.
`Crosslinking creates an irreversible 3D network and makes polyethylene more difficult to
`recycle.
`
`231
`
`Page 15 of 498
`
`

`
`Thermoplastics and Thermoplastic Composites
`
`4.1.9 Foams
`Unlike industrial solid polymers, which are processed as carefully as possible to avoid the
`formation of bubbles, vacuoles etc., alveolar materials result from the desire to introduce, in
`a controlled way, a certain proportion of voids with the aim of:
`• increasing flexibility: very soft seals
`• improving the thermal or phonic insulating character: foams for building, automotive . . .
`• making damping parts: foams for packaging, automotive and transport safety parts.
`The alveolar materials consist of a polymer skeleton surrounding the cells, which may be
`closed or partially or completely open to neighbouring cells or the outside.
`The intrinsic properties come from those of the polyethylene with:
`• a reduction in the mechanical properties due to the small quantity of material and the
`high proportion of gas.
`• a reduction in the chemical behaviour due to the highly divided nature of the material.
`The thin cell walls immediately absorb liquids and gases and are rapidly damaged.
`Generally, the properties of polyethylene foams are:
`• densities from 25 kg/m3 up to 330 kg/m3.
`• semi-rigid to flexible
`• closed cells
`• crosslinked or linear. Often, crosslinking improves the mechanical properties and
`chemical resistance.
`Polyethylene foams (see Table 4.4) have:
`• insulating properties
`• damping properties
`• fair mechanical characteristics according to their density: Figure 4.6 displays an example
`of tensile strength versus density
`• a low absorption and permeability to water or moisture and excellent hydrolysis
`behaviour
`• a naturally low fire resistance that can be improved by a suitable formulation.
`
`Table 4.4 Example

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket